Restless legs syndrome augmentation and pramipexole treatment

Objective: To evaluate in an open-label clinical series the occurrence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) augmentation in 60 consecutive RLS patients treated with pramipexole (PPX) for at least 6 months.Background: In patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS), augmentation is most commonly seen with long-term use of levodopa and pergolide.Method: Open-label clinical series in 60 consecutive RLS patients treated with PPX for at least 6 months.Results: Augmentation was observed in five patients (8.3%) after 4–15 weeks of treatment. Augmentation occurred more frequently in patients with secondary RLS (4/21) than in those with idiopathic RLS (1/39).Conclusions: Augmentation is unrelated to either severity of RLS or doses of PPX. There is a very low optimal therapeutic dose of PPX (0.25 mg/day) in most RLS patients (66%).     

Validation of the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale (ASRS): a multicentric, prospective study with levodopa on restless legs syndrome

BACKGROUND: Augmentation is the main complication during long-term dopaminergic treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) and reflects an overall increase in RLS severity. Its severity varies considerably from a minor problem to a devastating exacerbation of disease. Despite its clinical relevance, systematic evaluations have rarely been undertaken and there has been no development of methods to assess the severity of augmentation. To fill this gap, the European RLS Study Group (EURLSSG) has developed the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale (ASRS), using three items that assess the degree of change in three specific dimensions of augmentation. The changes in each dimension are summed to give an ASRS total score. METHODS: The ASRS was developed to cover the basic dimensions defining RLS augmentation. The items were developed by an interactive process involving professional and patient input. The ASRS that was evaluated included four major items and two alternative forms of one item. The validation was conducted using 63 (85%) mostly untreated RLS patients from six centers, who were treated for six months with levodopa (L-Dopa) (up to 500 mg/day, as clinically needed). Two consecutive assessments before and at baseline measured test-retest reliability. Consecutive ASRS ratings by two independent raters on a subsample of patients evaluated inter-rater reliability. Comparison with clinical severity ratings of two independent experts provided external validation of the ASRS. Comparison of patients with and without augmentation with regard to the items and the total score of the ASRS added discriminant validity. RESULTS: Sixty patients (63% females, mean age: 53 years, baseline International RLS Severity Rating (IRLS) score 24.7+/-5.2) were treated with a median daily dose of 300 mg L-Dopa (range: 50-500 mg). Thirty-six patients (60%) experienced augmentation. Item analyses indicated that one item could be removed as it did not contribute significantly to the test score and only one form of the duplicated item needed to be used. The final ASRS then included three items. Test-retest reliability for the total score was rho=0.72, and inter-rater reliability was rcc=0.94. Cronbach's alpha was 0.62. Validity as assessed by the correlation between the worst ASRS total score during the trial and the expert rating was rho=0.72. ASRS total score differed between patients without versus with augmentation (mean: 7.4 (standard deviation (SD)=4.0) vs. 2.0 (2.7) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The ASRS is a reliable and valid scale to measure the severity of augmentation. Due to the need to systematically quantify augmentation for both long-term efficacy and tolerability, the ASRS may become a useful tool to monitor augmentation in future clinical trials.     

Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial.

We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline.     

Low-dose pramipexole in the management of restless legs syndrome. An open label trial

Dopaminergic agents are considered the treatment of choice for restless legs syndrome (RLS); levodopa is the only substance licensed for this disorder in some European countries. However, in a substantial proportion of patients symptoms are not adequately controlled for a whole night due to the short half-life of levodopa or because symptom augmentation may develop. To further investigate the impact of pramipexole on the management of RLS we performed a short-term open label trial with pramipexole in 17 patients who were being insufficiently treated with levodopa or for whom pramipexole was primarily being considered because of the severity of the RLS symptoms. A single dose of 0.125-0.75 mg pramipexole (mean 0.3 +/- 0.2 mg) in the evening resulted in a significant improvement of subjective RLS symptoms as rated by the International RLS Study Group Severity Scale (IRLS scores: 29.8 +/- 4.7 baseline vs. 7.3 +/- 5.9 endpoint; p = 0.0001). Polysomnographic recordings showed a significant improvement of the periodic leg movements (PLM) index, PLM sleep arousal index, sleep-onset latency, total sleep time and sleep efficiency. All patients who had developed a worsening of RLS symptoms under levodopa recovered from daytime symptoms after their medication was switched to pramipexole. Since pramipexole was well tolerated, an ideal dosage to control RLS symptoms could be reached rapidly. Pramipexole has proven a suitable alternative in patients with moderate to severe RLS, particularly when their therapy has to be switched to a dopamine agonist.     

Ropinirole as a treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients on chronic hemodialysis: an open randomized crossover trial versus levodopa sustained release

OBJECTIVE: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurologic condition characterized by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs, occurring primarily at rest, which are usually worse in the evening and are alleviated by movement. RLS is present in 20-40% of patients with renal failure. This study was a 14-week open, randomized, crossover trial of ropinirole vs. levodopa sustained release (SR) in 11 patients with RLS on chronic hemodialysis. METHODS: Eleven patients (7 men, 4 women) were enrolled in the study. They received either levodopa SR or ropinirole for 6 weeks, followed by a washout week, then the alternate treatment for 6 weeks. Patients rated the severity of RLS by means of a 6-item questionnaire developed by the International Restless Legs Study Group (6-item IRLS), by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and by sleep diaries. RESULTS: Under treatment with levodopa SR, 1 patient presented severe vomiting, leading to study discontinuation. The 10 patients who completed the study reported a 33.5% improvement (from 16.7 +/- 3.2 to 11.1 +/- 4; P < 0.001) of the 6-item IRLS scores during levodopa SR treatment and a 73.5% improvement (from 16.6 +/- 2.8 to 4.4 +/- 3.8; P < 0.001) during ropinirole treatment. By the end of the study the mean levodopa SR dosage was 190 mg/d and the mean ropinirole dosage was 1.45 mg/d. Ropinirole was superior to levodopa SR in reducing 6-item IRLS scores (P < 0.001) and in increasing sleep time (P < 0.001). The patient CGI scale showed a significant difference favoring ropinirole (P < 0.01). There was no significant carryover or period effect for any outcome measure. Four patients reported a complete reversion of RLS symptoms during ropinirole treatment at doses ranging from 0.25-2 mg/d. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ropinirole is more effective than levodopa SR in the treatment of RLS in patients on chronic hemodialysis.     

Rate of augmentation and risk factors with long-term follow-up in Japanese patients with restless legs syndrome

Objectives

Preventing augmentation is the critical clinical issue for RLS treatment. As for augmentation in Asian RLS patients, there have been only four studies and the follow-up durations of these studies were not long. We investigated Japanese RLS patients with longer duration of treatment in a clinical setting.

Methods

This study is a retrospective assessment of 42 RLS patients with follow-up durations of longer than 18 months (78.4?±?29.2, range 19–139) at two urban sleep centers in Osaka, Japan from May 2004 to April 2014.

Results

The mean age of first visit was 63.5?±?14.1 years old and the estimated age of RLS onset was 47.9?±?16.5 years old. Twenty-eight out of 42 patients were female. At initial evaluation, the mean International Restless Legs Scale score (IRLS score) was 22.0?±?5.9. Thirty-one of 42 had already visited other clinics before coming to our sleep centers, and the number of clinics visited was 1.3?±?0.6. Augmentation developed in two patients (4.8%), and the dosage of dopamine equivalent in patients with and without augmentation was 12.5 and 18.8 mg vs. 15.8?±?17.7 mg. In the two RLS patients with augmentation, ferritin was 113.1 and 114.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the number of clinics before coming to our sleep centers was both three.

Conclusions

The augmentation rate of Japanese RLS patients from our study is low compared with previous Western and Asian studies. It might be attributable to racial difference, lower dosage of dopaminergic treatment, and the level of ferritin.

     

A method to switch from oral dopamine agonists to rotigotine in patients with restless legs syndrome and mild augmentation

BackgroundWe examined the short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability of a cross-titration algorithm from oral dopamine agonists to the rotigotine transdermal patch in patients dissatisfied with their restless legs syndrome (RLS) treatment, predominantly with mild augmentation.MethodsPatients with RLS (n = 20) were recruited at a single site. The cross-titration consisted of decreasing oral dopaminergic agents (ropinirole by 1 mg or pramipexole by 0.25 mg) and increasing rotigotine by 1 mg every two days. Efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at one, three, six and 12 months after the switch.ResultsPatients had moderate–severe RLS symptoms at the baseline (mean international restless legs syndrome (IRLS) score 19.4 ± 5.5); 85% had augmentation and 45% reported afternoon RLS symptoms. The baseline mean pramipexole equivalent dose was 0.6 ± 0.3 mg. At Week 5, 85% (17/20) had successfully switched from their oral dopamine agonist to rotigotine (mean dose 2.5 ± 0.6 mg; change in IRLS score: −6.7 ± 8.4, p = 0.002); 14 patients were CGI-I responders (much or very much improved). Three patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. Twelve months after cross-titration, 10 patients continued on rotigotine, of whom four required either higher doses of rotigotine or supplemental RLS medication compared with their optimal Week 5 dose; five patients withdrew due to AEs and two due to lack of efficacy.ConclusionA cross-titration to rotigotine was efficacious after five weeks in 70% of patients dissatisfied with RLS treatment, most of whom had mild augmentation. At one year following the medication switch, 50% had discontinued rotigotine due to lack of continued efficacy or side effects.     

Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis‐Ekbom Disease): Results from a prospective,multicenter study over 66 weeks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of augmentation over 66 weeks of treatment with ropinirole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). Augmentation is the main complication of long‐term dopaminergic treatment of RLS. Despite widespread use of ropinirole in RLS, no studies have prospectively and systematically assessed the incidence of augmentation with its use. The study consisted of 26 weeks of double‐blind flexible‐dose treatment with ropinirole or placebo, followed by 40 weeks of open‐label ropinirole treatment.. Patients had no previous history of augmentation. Potential cases of augmentation were identified with the Structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Augmentation and the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale and through reporting of adverse events. Cases were blindly evaluated by an expert panel using the NIH diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Four hundred and four patients participated in the double‐blind study and 269 in the open‐label phase, with a discontinuation rate of 42%. IRLS baseline scores improved at the end of the double‐blind (DB) phase (mean ± SE) by ?15.9 ± 0.76 for ropinirole, by ?13.4 ± 0.77 for placebo (P < .05) and by ?20.4 ± 0.55 during the open‐label phase. The incidence rates of augmentation were 3.5% for ropinirole and <1% for placebo during the DB phase and 3% during the open‐label phase. Clinically significant augmentation occurred in 3%, <1%, and 2%, respectively. Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 50% of all patients (7 of 14) with augmentation. The incidence of augmentation was 3.1% higher with ropinirole than with placebo. New patients with first episodes of augmentation continued to cumulate at a stable rate over the duration of this study. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society     

Polysomnographic findings in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients with severe augmentation

Background and objectivesAugmentation can occur frequently in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients treated with dopaminergic agents. Video-polysomnographic (PSG) data from augmented RLS patients are scant. The aim of this study was to evaluate PSG findings in augmented RLS patients and compare them with those of non-augmented RLS patients.Patients and methodsValid PSG data were analyzed from 99 augmented and 84 non-augmented RLS inpatients who underwent one night PSG.ResultsBoth patient groups showed a high subjective burden of RLS symptoms. The mean scores on the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) were significantly higher in the group with augmentation than in the group without. The periodic leg movement index (PLMI) was increased in both groups, mostly on account of the PLM in wakefulness (PLMW). Both groups presented a reduced sleep efficiency and an increased sleep latency. The levodopa equivalent dose (LED) was significantly higher in the augmented group.ConclusionsOur study confirms that RLS patients with augmentation have disturbed sleep due to high amount of leg movements and fragmented sleep. Overall, however, polysomnographic characteristics were not different between insufficiently treated RLS and severely augmented RLS patients, implying that augmentation could represent a severe form of RLS and not a different phenomenon.     

Natural course of restless legs syndrome/Willis–Ekbom disease: long-term observation of a large clinical cohort

ObjectiveAlthough restless legs syndrome (RLS)/Willis–Ekbom disease (WED) is a common neurological disorder, data on the long-term course and management of the disease are scarce. The aim of the current study was to extend the knowledge on the long-term clinical course and treatment outcome of RLS/WED.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, we performed a chart review of consecutive visits of 160 patients with definite RLS/WED from the RLS/WED database of the Innsbruck Medical University.ResultsA total of 160 patients (58.8% female, aged 58.9 years, range 21.5–86.8 years) met inclusion criteria of two or more visits during a follow-up of at least five years. The duration of the observational period was 8.1 ± 2.9 years. During the observational period, the percentage of treated patients increased (first vs last visit: 67.5% vs 77.5%). Of the patients, 59.4% had one or more switches of medication. Overall the RLS/WED severity, evaluated using a combined severity score (CSS) ranging from 1 to 5, decreased between the first and last visits (median [range], first visit: 3 [1–5] vs last visit 2.5 [1–5]; p <0.001). Symptoms improved in 55.0% of patients, worsened in 10.6%, and remained unchanged in 34.4% during the observational period. Augmentation of RLS/WED occurred in 42 patients (13/42 as the presenting cause; 29/42 occurring during treatment after 4.1 years). The annual rate of augmentation for subjects on dopaminergic medication was 8.1%.ConclusionsOur data suggest that, with the possibility of regular treatment adjustments, RLS/WED remains treatable in the majority of patients over years. Nevertheless, in this study, despite the overall decreased severity, RLS symptoms remained unchanged or worsened in 45% of the patients during the observational period.     

Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease): results from a prospective, multicenter study over 66 weeks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of augmentation over 66 weeks of treatment with ropinirole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). Augmentation is the main complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of RLS. Despite widespread use of ropinirole in RLS, no studies have prospectively and systematically assessed the incidence of augmentation with its use. The study consisted of 26 weeks of double-blind flexible-dose treatment with ropinirole or placebo, followed by 40 weeks of open-label ropinirole treatment.. Patients had no previous history of augmentation. Potential cases of augmentation were identified with the Structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Augmentation and the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale and through reporting of adverse events. Cases were blindly evaluated by an expert panel using the NIH diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Four hundred and four patients participated in the double-blind study and 269 in the open-label phase, with a discontinuation rate of 42%. IRLS baseline scores improved at the end of the double-blind (DB) phase (mean ± SE) by -15.9 ± 0.76 for ropinirole, by -13.4 ± 0.77 for placebo (P < .05) and by -20.4 ± 0.55 during the open-label phase. The incidence rates of augmentation were 3.5% for ropinirole and <1% for placebo during the DB phase and 3% during the open-label phase. Clinically significant augmentation occurred in 3%, <1%, and 2%, respectively. Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 50% of all patients (7 of 14) with augmentation. The incidence of augmentation was 3.1% higher with ropinirole than with placebo. New patients with first episodes of augmentation continued to cumulate at a stable rate over the duration of this study.     

Relationship of periodic leg movements and severity of restless legs syndrome: a study in unmedicated and medicated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of the severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) as assessed by a subjective, patient-rated scale (International RLS Study Group Rating Scale, IRLS), and of periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) as an objective parameter, in two different patient populations. METHODS: Data of 200 unmedicated patients with idiopathic RLS were evaluated. Group 1 (n=100) consisted of selected patients participating in the Pergolide European Australian RLS (PEARLS) study. Group 2 (n=100) represented an outpatient RLS population investigated in a Sleep Disorders Center. Additionally, Group 1 was also evaluated after a 6 week double-blind treatment period, where 47 patients received pergolide and 53 patients placebo. RESULTS: In unmedicated patients, IRLS scores correlated with the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.22, p=0.033) but not with the PLMS index in Group 1 while no correlation was found in Group 2. The change of the IRLS score under treatment in Group 1 correlated significantly both with the change of the PLMS index (r=0.42, p<0.001) and the change of the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.38, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IRLS adequately reflects treatment changes of PLMS indices. In unmedicated patients, the IRLS correlates with PLMS indices probably only in selected RLS populations with predefined PSG criteria and high PLM activity. SIGNIFICANCE: The IRLS is an appropriate subjective rating scale for measuring treatment effects in RLS.     

Restless legs syndrome in Egyptian medical students using a validated Arabic version of the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale

ObjectiveRestless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common movement disorder that has a variable prevalence and impact reported from different countries and specific populations. The current study validated an Arabic version of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) rating scale (IRLS) and investigated the prevalence and impact of RLS in medical students at Ain Shams University in Cairo.MethodsTranslation of IRLS was done according to standard recognized guidelines provided by the publisher. A total of 389 medical students (217 female and 172 male) participated in the study and answered four questions to detect RLS as proposed by the IRLSSG. Subjects who answered positively the first three questions were recruited for face-to-face interview to exclude RLS mimics and to answer the IRLS.ResultsA total of 46 subjects (11.8%; 27 female and 19 male) met the four criteria for RLS. Of these, 39 subjects (10%) had idiopathic RLS. Five subjects (1.3%) and two subjects (0.5%) reported association with history of anemia and diabetes mellitus respectively. Their mean total IRLS score was 16.33 ± 5.3, with moderate severity (11.62 ± 3.9) and low impact (3.1 ± 1.8). The prevalence of individuals who had two or more episodes of RLS of at least moderate severity per week was 5.9%.ConclusionIn this specific population of Egyptian medical students, a within-average prevalence of RLS was found with low impact on quality of life similar to worldwide reported populations. RLS sufferers were of high prevalence among this cohort. The Arabic version of IRLS is reliable and valid for further research in Arabic countries.     

Relation of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale with the Clinical Global Impression severity scale,the restless legs syndrome 6-item questionnaire,and the restless legs syndrome-quality of life questionnaire

BackgroundThe SP790 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00136045) showed benefits of rotigotine over placebo in improving symptom severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS), also known as Willis-Ekbom disease, on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impression item 1 (CGI-1), RLS 6-item questionnaire (RLS-6), and the RLS-quality of life questionnaire (RLS-QoL) in patients with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS. To provide clinical context for the IRLS and to guide the choice of assessment scales for RLS studies, our post hoc analysis of SP790 data evaluated associations between the IRLS and the CGI-1, IRLS and RLS-6, and the IRLS and RLS-QoL.MethodsScale associations were analyzed at baseline and at the end of maintenance (EoM) using data from the safety set (rotigotine and placebo groups combined [n = 458]). Changes from baseline to EoM in IRLS score vs comparator scale scores also were analyzed.ResultsThere was a trend towards increasing IRLS severity category with increasing CGI-1, RLS-6, and RLS-QoL score. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients showed correlations between IRLS and comparator scale scores at baseline and EoM as well as correlations for change from baseline to EoM.ConclusionCorrelations between the IRLS and comparator scales were substantial. These data indicate that the IRLS is clinically meaningful. The IRLS and CGI-1 are generally sufficient to evaluate the overall severity and impact of RLS symptoms in clinical trials.     

The severity range of restless legs syndrome (RLS) and augmentation in a prospective patient cohort: Association with ferritin levels

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to prospectively examine all patients with a diagnosis of RLS consulting a sleep disorders clinic and to assess RLS severity and augmentation and their associations, including ferritin levels.MethodsPatients were stratified into patients with RLS as ancillary diagnosis, RLS sufferers without current augmentation and RLS sufferers with current augmentation. Work-up included RLS severity scales and blood biochemical variables including indices of iron metabolism.ResultsIn an 18-month period, 302 patients with RLS (183 women, 119 men; mean age, 59.1 ± 13.7 years) were recruited. RLS was considered idiopathic in 291 patients (96.4%). Most patients (240, 79.5%) were RLS sufferers, whereas the remaining 62 (20.5%) had RLS as ancillary diagnosis. Nineteen out of 162 patients treated with dopaminergic agents (11.7%) had current augmentation. Almost one-third of all patients (31.1%) had ferritin levels <50 μg/l. Patients with an ancillary diagnosis of RLS had higher ferritin levels than RLS sufferers without current augmentation. The lowest ferritin levels were present in RLS sufferers with current augmentation 132.8 ± 98.0 μg/l vs. 100.6 ± 84.5 μg/l vs. 55.8 ± 43.6 μg/l; p = 0.002). Patients with augmentation did not differ from non-augmented patients regarding age, gender, RLS etiology, presence of previous augmentation, or any other documented comorbidity (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe severity spectrum of RLS in this clinical cohort ranged from the ancillary diagnosis of RLS to augmented RLS. There was an inverse correlation between RLS severity and ferritin levels. Patients with current augmentation had the lowest ferritin levels. Our data further strengthen a putative role of low iron stores as a potential aggravator of idiopathic RLS. Moreover, low ferritin might represent a potential biomarker of RLS augmentation under dopaminergic therapy.     

Polysomnographic and pharmacokinetic findings in levodopa-induced augmentation of restless legs syndrome.

Augmentation, defined as a loss of circadian recurrence with progressively earlier daily onset and increase in the duration, intensity, and anatomy of symptoms, not compatible with the half-life of the drug, is associated with dopaminergic treatment in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients. The pathogenesis of augmentation is unclear. We describe a patient with idiopathic RLS who developed augmentation after 8 months of levodopa treatment. Videopolysomnographic and pharmacokinetic studies with monitoring of plasma levodopa levels demonstrated marked motor hyperactivity during augmentation, with anarchic discharges of motor unit potentials, tonic grouped discharges and flexor spasms, associated with painful dysesthesia. Symptoms and signs of augmentation were related to low plasma levodopa levels, abating 75 minutes after oral levodopa administration and reappearing after 3 hours, closely mirroring the rapid rise and fall of plasma levodopa concentration. This case is the first report in which RLS augmentation is shown to be characterized by motor hyperkinesias paralleling levodopa plasma pharmacokinetic profile.     

Management of augmentation of restless legs syndrome with rotigotine: a 1-year observational study

AimThe aim of this study is to assess the effect of switching to rotigotine transdermal patch on severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in patients who experienced acute augmentation with previous oral dopaminergics.MethodsIn this 13-month observational study, adults with moderate-to-severe RLS and augmentation were switched to rotigotine per the physician’s independent decision. Assessments included Clinical Global Impression severity score (CGI-1); (primary), treatment regimen for switching (secondary), RLS-6, International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS), and augmentation severity rating scale (ASRS).ResultsA total of 99 patients received rotigotine, of whom 46 completed observational period, and 43 were assessed for effectiveness. A total of 5 patients switched to rotigotine after a >1-day drug holiday, 23 switched overnight, 9 had an overlapping switch, and 6 received ongoing oral dopaminergics with rotigotine for ≥28 days. Of the 99 patients, 57 took concomitant RLS medications (excluding switching medications) on at least 1 day. At the final visit, median change in CGI-1 (Hodges–Lehman estimate [95% CI]) was −2.0 (–2.5, −1.50); 37 of the 43 patients improved by ≥1 CGI-1 category, and 16 of 43 were responders (≥50% improvement). RLS-6 and IRLS scores also improved. Patients had median ASRS of 0 at the final visit indicating “no worsening/occurrence of augmentation.” ASRS item 1 showed a shift in mean time of symptom onset (24-h clock) from 12:38 (baseline) to 18:25 (final visit). Most common reasons for withdrawal of rotigotine were adverse events (26 patients) and lack of efficacy (14 patients).ConclusionsSwitching from oral therapies to rotigotine was effective in improving RLS symptoms in 37 of the 43 patients (from the original population of 99 patients) who remained in the study over 13 months.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01386944.     

Augmentation in restless legs syndrome is associated with low ferritin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Augmentation is a major problem with dopaminergic therapy for restless legs syndrome (RLS), and predictors of augmentation have not yet been identified. We aimed to analyze the relationship between baseline ferritin level and occurrence of augmentation in a retrospective analysis of a prospective double-blind trial of cabergoline versus levodopa on augmentation in RLS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who experienced augmentation were compared to patients who did not experience augmentation. RESULTS: Augmentation symptoms causing premature discontinuation from the study or which were tolerated (n=36, ferritin: 85+59 ng/ml) were associated with lower levels of serum ferritin compared to patients without augmentation (n=302, ferritin: 118+108 ng/ml, p=0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: Ferritin as a marker of iron storage may play an important role in the pathophysiology of RLS and may prove to be a biomarker for the development of augmentation under dopaminergic therapy.     

High false-positive rate of questionnaire-based restless legs syndrome diagnosis in multiple sclerosis

Background/ObjectivesRestless legs syndrome (RLS) is diagnosed by self-reported symptoms. Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have disease-related symptoms which could mimic RLS. This study assessed the: (1) false-positive rate for questionnaire-based RLS diagnosis in MS patients and (2) utility of periodic leg movements during wakefulness (PLMW) on overnight polysomnography (PSG) in identifying true-positive RLS patients.MethodsAmbulatory MS patients without known sleep disorders were recruited. Subjects completed the International RLS Study Group (IRLSG) diagnostic questionnaire (IRLDQ) and underwent full overnight PSG. IRLDQ-positive patients underwent clinical evaluation to confirm the diagnosis and completed the RLS severity scale (IRLS).ResultsSeventy-one MS patients (mean age 46.8 ± 10.4 years) were evaluated. Thirty-eight had a positive IRLDQ. RLS diagnosis was confirmed in 22, yielding a false-positive rate of 42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26–59%], predominantly attributable to paresthesiae (n = 7), and cramps and/or muscle spasms (n = 4). IRLS scores were not significantly different between subjects with confirmed and nonconfirmed RLS. The PLMW index was significantly higher in patients with confirmed RLS (55.4 ± 41.9 vs. 29.7 ± 18.8, p = 0.03). The sensitivity of a PLMW index >70/h for true-positive IRLDQ was 8/22 = 36%, 95% CI: 17.2–59.3, and the specificity was 16/16 = 100%, 95% CI: 79.4–100.ConclusionsMS patients have a high false-positive rate of RLS diagnosis using a standardized questionnaire largely attributable to MS-related sensorimotor symptoms. While detailed clinical evaluation is essential for confirming RLS diagnosis, the PLMW index may provide useful adjunctive information.     

Validation of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale for restless legs syndrome

BACKGROUND: There is a need for an easily administered instrument which can be applied to all patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) to measure disease severity for clinical assessment, research, or therapeutic trials. The pathophysiology of RLS is not clear and no objective measure so far devised can apply to all patients or accurately reflect severity. Moreover, RLS is primarily a subjective disorder. Therefore, a subjective scale is at present the optimal instrument to meet this need. METHODS: Twenty centers from six countries participated in an initial reliability and validation study of a rating scale for the severity of RLS designed by the International RLS study group (IRLSSG). A ten-question scale was developed on the basis of repeated expert evaluation of potential items. This scale, the IRLSSG rating scale (IRLS), was administered to 196 RLS patients, most on some medication, and 209 control subjects. RESULTS: The IRLS was found to have high levels of internal consistency, inter-examiner reliability, test-retest reliability over a 2-4 week period, and convergent validity. It also demonstrated criterion validity when tested against the current criterion of a clinical global impression and readily discriminated patient from control groups. The scale was dominated by a single severity factor that explained at least 59% of the pooled item variance. CONCLUSIONS: This scale meets performance criteria for a brief, patient completed instrument that can be used to assess RLS severity for purposes of clinical assessment, research, or therapeutic trials. It supports a finding that RLS is a relatively uniform disorder in which the severity of the basic symptoms is strongly related to their impact on the patient's life. In future studies, the IRLS should be tested against objective measures of RLS severity and its sensitivity should be studied as RLS severity is systematically manipulated by therapeutic interventions.