Cost and effectiveness of treatments for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in haemophilia patients with inhibitors in Korea

Summary.  First-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea is currently activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) as second-line therapy or as a last resort. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost and effectiveness of aPCC vs. rFVIIa for treating mild-to-moderate bleeds in inhibitor patients from the Korean reimbursement authorities' perspective. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization data (number of doses, average dose, number of outpatient visits, inpatient stays, ambulance transport and concomitant medications) were collected from an observational study involving four Korean paediatric haemophilia centres. Cost-effectiveness was modelled using a decision analysis approach and sensitivity analyses undertaken. rFVIIa was a more effective haemostatic therapy (87.1% efficacy in bleed resolution) than aPCC (64.0%). rFVIIa effected more rapid haemostasis, resolving bleeding in a mean of 6.6 h vs. 25.2 h for aPCC. Fewer rFVIIa doses were required per bleed vs. aPCC (means 1.7 and 2.3). Mean total direct medical costs from bleed initiation to cessation were estimated at Korean Won (KRW)12 460 thousand (US$12 311) for rFVIIa given as first-line therapy and KRW18 304 thousand (US$18 085) for aPCC given as first-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa vs. aPCC given as first-line therapy. In Korea, use of rFVIIa as first-line therapy for treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients is both clinically effective and cost-effective compared with initial aPCC treatment. rFVIIa should be considered as the first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea.     

Patient/caregiver-reported recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) dosing: home treatment of acute bleeds in the Dosing Observational Study in Hemophilia (DOSE)

Patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors experience acute bleeds managed with bypassing agents, such as recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa). Home-based treatment and dosing patterns in the US remain poorly described. This study aimed to assess the prescribed and actual rFVIIa dosing in frequently bleeding inhibitor patients (≥4 bleeds in 3 months) prescribed first-line therapy with rFVIIa. Patients or caregivers recorded daily diaries, including the details of all bypassing agent infusions for 3-6 months. Median (range) initial rFVIIa dose prescribed for joint, muscle and other bleeds was 167.5 (61.0-289.0) mcg kg(-1). Additional rFVIIa doses prescribed were 90 (61-270) mcg kg(-1) at an interval of 2.5-3 (1-24) h. The actual initial rFVIIa dose reported by patients/caregivers for 158 bleeds was 212 (59-400) mcg kg(-1), with total dose per episode of 695 (74-21257) mcg kg(-1). Patient/caregiver-reported average dose per bleed was 146 (40-400) mcg kg(-1) across 5 (1-106) infusions. The initial rFVIIa dose was higher for haemarthrosis (223 [59-400] mcg kg(-1)) than muscle bleeds (148 [74-300] mcg kg(-1); P = 0.07). Initial and mean dose per day changed as treatment progressed. The DOSE study indicates that frequently bleeding inhibitor patients are prescribed and use higher rFVIIa dosing for all bleed types than recommended in the package insert (90 mcg kg(-1)). The rFVIIa dosing was highly variable within and across bleed types, with higher initial doses used for joint bleeds than muscle and other bleed types, particularly in the first days of treatment. This suggests that patients/caregivers have adopted home treatment strategies based on physician discretion and individual responses and experience.     

A cost evaluation of treatment alternatives for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Brazil

Summary.  The first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Brazil is currently activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) used as second-line therapy or as a last resort. The aim of this study was to determine the cost and effectiveness of these treatments from the perspective of the Brazilian National Health Service. A decision analysis model was constructed to assess total direct medical costs (including drug costs, costs of outpatient or inpatient care, ambulance transportation and cost of concomitant medications) of first-line treatment with aPCC or rFVIIa. Clinical outcome and resource utilization data were obtained both retrospectively and prospectively and validated by the consensus of an expert panel of Brazilian haematologists. A total of 103 bleeds in 25 patients were included in the analysis. rFVIIa resolved bleeds more quickly (4.4 h) than aPCC (62.6 h) and was more effective (100% vs. 56.7% respectively). Mean total direct medical costs (from initiation to cessation of bleed) were estimated to be US$13 500 (aPCC) and US$7590 (rFVIIa). Extensive sensitivity analyses confirmed the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa. Compared with aPCC, rFVIIa was more effective and less expensive when used as first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Brazil. rFVIIa should be considered a first-line treatment for the management of these patients.     

Cost‐effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII vs. plasma‐derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate bleeding episodes in patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors in Spain

Several analyses have shown that recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is a cost‐effective intervention compared with plasma‐derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate (pd‐aPCC) for the on‐demand treatment of mild‐to‐moderate bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The aim of the study was to assess the cost‐effectiveness of rFVIIa vs. pd‐aPCC in the treatment of bleeding episodes in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors in Spain. A decision analytic model was designed to evaluate the costs and clinical outcomes of using rFVIIa or pd‐aPCC to treat mild‐to‐moderate joint bleeds in children (≤14 years old) and adults with inhibitors. Data were obtained from a published meta‐analysis and a panel of haemophilia experts. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System. One‐way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of model assumptions on study results. In the Treur meta‐analysis, rFVIIa resulted in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 88% and 95% after 24 and 36 h, respectively, compared with 62% and 76%, respectively, with pd‐aPCC (Treur et al. Haemophilia 2009; 15 : 420–36). Here, the mean cost per bleed was estimated at €8473 and €15 579 in children and adults treated with rFVIIa, vs. €8627 and €15 677 in children and adults treated with pd‐aPCC. rFVIIa treatment was found to be the dominating option (cheaper and more effective). The one‐way sensitivity analysis also confirmed that rFVIIa was less costly than pd‐aPCC. The model suggests that rFVIIa is a cost‐effective option compared with pd‐aPCC for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate bleeding episodes in a Spanish setting.     

Prophylactic recombinant factor VIIa in haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Prevention of bleeding, especially into joints, with prophylactic factor infusions is the most effective treatment for severe haemophilia patients. Approximately 15-30% of patients with factor VIII deficiency and 3-5% of patients with factor IX deficiency develop neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to factor precluding their use. Such patients often have significant bleeding complications including life- and limb-threatening bleeds and severe joint disease. Prophylaxis for such patients is not generally considered because of the fact that the standard (bypassing) agents for such patients are not as effective as natural factor replacement, because of concerns for thrombotic complications and also because of the very high cost of bypassing agents. We treated two patients with high titre inhibitors with prophylactic recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). The first patient was treated as a result of development of a target joint and to reduce the use of agents that can lead to anamnesis of his inhibitor. The second patient had multiple severe bleeds and was hospitalized 20% of the time over a 2-year period. He had a very poor quality of life. Both patients had shown good responses previously to rFVIIa for treatment of bleeds. Both patients had an outstanding response to prophylaxis albeit at a very high cost. Prophylaxis with rFVIIa can be an effective approach in select inhibitor patients with severe complications related to bleeding.     

Tranexamic acid as adjunct therapy to bypassing agents in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

Haemophilia patients with inhibitors require bypassing agents (BPA) like activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to control bleeds. Adjunct tranexamic acid (TXA) may improve haemostasis. The objective of this study was to investigate safety and haemostatic effect of TXA given in combination with BPA. Healthy volunteers (N = 5) and haemophilia inhibitor patients (N = 6) were enrolled in a prospective case crossover design. Controls were treated with TXA 20 mg kg^?1 orally (O.R.) Patients were treated with aPCC 75 IU kg^?1 intravenous (I.V.) on day 1 followed by TXA 20 mg kg^?1 O.R. combined with aPCC 75 IU kg^?1 I.V. on day 2. A 14‐day washout occurred before crossover to rFVIIa 90 μg kg^?1 I.V. ±TXA. Safety evaluation and blood sampling processes were performed at baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min post treatment. Primary outcome was maximum clot firmness (MCF) evaluated by whole blood thromboelastometry using a TF + tissue plasminogen activator‐based assay. Healthy controls showed a 20‐fold increase in MCF following TXA. Adjunct TXA to aPCC or rFVIIa induced a significant increase in MCF (P < 0.0001) reaching levels indistinguishable from healthy controls treated with TXA (P > 0.05). Infusion of aPCC or rFVIIa alone induced only 3–10 fold increase in MCF from baseline, with a decline in MCF starting after 60–120 min. TXA did not increase the endogenous thrombin potential. No clinical or laboratory signs of thromboembolic events, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or hypercoagulability were observed. Combination of aPCC or rFVIIa with TXA normalizes clot stability in haemophilia patients with inhibitor as compared to healthy controls. No clinical or laboratory adverse events were observed.     

Paediatric haemophilia with inhibitors: existing management options, treatment gaps and unmet needs

Summary.  Development of inhibitors is a severe complication of haemophilia posing many management challenges. While a long-term goal in inhibitor patients is eradication of inhibitors through immune tolerance induction, bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) are essential for control of bleeding episodes. Paediatric patients with haemophilia and inhibitors are at particular risk of recurrent haemarthroses, and management of these patients should seek to avoid joint damage and support the child's full social and physical development. Current options for management of bleeding complications include on-demand treatment of acute bleeding episodes, secondary prophylaxis to avoid recurrent bleeds and surgery to treat affected joints. There is also a rationale for adopting prophylactic approaches to prevent bleeding in inhibitor patients, allowing this group similar opportunities for protection against arthropathy development as are given to non-inhibitor patients. This paper, based on a roundtable meeting of haematology experts at the first Zürich Haemophilia Forum in May 2008, reviews the current evidence supporting more intense and prophylactic approaches to manage bleeding risk in paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors, and highlights the need for investigations of primary prophylaxis in this vulnerable patient group, to support best long-term outcome.     

A cost minimization model for the treatment of minor bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors

Treatment of acute bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) most often involves the use of bypassing haemostatic agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We constructed a cost minimization model to compare the costs of initial treatment with aPCC vs. rFVIIa in the home treatment of minor bleeding episodes. We developed a clinical scenario describing such a case and presented it to a panel of US haemophilia specialists. For each product class, we asked panellists to provide dosing regimens required to achieve complete resolution of a minor haemarthrosis in a child with high-titre inhibitors, and for the probabilities of success at two time points (8-12 and 24 h). Consensus among the panellists was refined by a second round of the process, and the median values resulting were used as inputs to a decision analysis model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine threshold values for key variables. The base case model found that initial treatment with aPCC would result in a mean cost per episode of 21 000 dollars, compared with 33 400 dollars for initial treatment with rFVIIa. Sensitivity analyses over a range of clinically plausible values for cost, dosing, and efficacy did not change the selection of aPCC as the dominant strategy.     

Efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII vs. activated prothrombin complex concentrate for patients suffering from haemophilia complicated with inhibitors: a Bayesian meta-regression

Summary.  The optimal on-demand treatment of joint bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors is a source of debate, with studies reporting various efficacy levels for different drugs and dosage regimens. To analyse, in a unified Bayesian meta-regression model, the published efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and/or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) as on-demand treatments for joint bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A systematic search was carried out to identify studies reporting on dosage and efficacy of rFVIIa and aPCC in the treatment of joint bleeds in the target patient population. Data were abstracted and included in the model and adjusted for potential sources of heterogeneity. Pooled efficacy levels for typical rFVIIa and aPCC regimens were estimated. Seventeen studies, collectively reporting on >2000 joint bleeds, were included. Medication type combined with dosage was the only significant explanatory parameter. The model predicts that a typical regimen of 90 μg kg⁻¹ rFVII repeated every 3 h if needed results in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 66%, 88% and 95% after 12, 24 and 36 h, respectively. In comparison, a typical regimen of 75 IU kg⁻¹ aPCC repeated every 12 h if needed results in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 39%, 62% and 76%, respectively. These differences were statistically significant and were also robust in sensitivity analyses. This analysis suggests that a typical rFVIIa regimen will resolve joint bleeds more effectively than a typical aPCC regimen after 12, 24 and 36 h.     

Recombinant activated factor VII safety and efficacy in the treatment of cranial haemorrhage in patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors: an analysis of the Hemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society Registry (2004–2008)

Summary. Cranial haemorrhage (CH) is a potentially serious complication in patients with severe congenital haemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI). Treatment includes bypassing agents, such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). To examine the US experience in treating CH with rFVIIa, a retrospective review of the Hemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society 2004–2008 database was conducted. Among 29 patients with CHwI, 56 of the reported haemorrhages met the study criteria. Of these, 75% were traumatic and 80% were extracranial (ECH). The majority (8/11, 73%) of intracranial haemorrhages (ICHs) developed spontaneously. Conversely, most ECHs (39/45, 87%) followed trauma. ICHs were treated with a median/mean of 23/58 rFVIIa infusions over a median/mean of 7/9 days while ECHs were treated with a median/mean of 1/3 infusions (P = 0.011) over a median/mean of 1/1 day. The median/mean initial rFVIIa doses for all CHs were 106/137 μg kg⁻¹, and were similar for ICHs and ECHs. All ECHs were effectively controlled with rFVIIa; 44/45 bleeds were controlled within 24 h, one bleed was successfully treated perioperatively, and 27 ECHs required only a single dose. Nine out of 11 ICHs were effectively treated with rFVIIa; six ICHs were controlled within 24 h, one within 72 h and in two cases haemostasis was achieved during the perioperative period. No serious treatment‐associated adverse events were reported. One patient died as a result of ICH despite the reported control of bleeding. In conclusion, standard dosing of rFVIIa was found to be safe and effective in treating CH with an efficacy rate of 100% for ECH and 82% for ICH.     

Elective orthopaedic surgery for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: single centre experience of 40 procedures and review of the literature

Summary. With the introduction of safe and effective factor VIII/IX‐bypassing agents – recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and plasma‐derived activated prothrombin complex concentrates (pd‐APCC) – elective orthopaedic surgery (EOS) is a viable option for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. We report a series of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors undergoing EOS between 1997 and 2008 using bypassing agents to provide haemostatic cover. All inhibitor patients undergoing EOS and receiving rFVIIa, plasma‐derived prothrombin complex concentrates (pd‐PCC) or pd‐APCC as haemostatic cover were included. Patients were operated on by the same surgeon and were managed by the same haemophilia treatment centre. Forty procedures (25 minor and 15 major) were conducted in 18 patients. Twenty‐one minor cases were covered using rFVIIa, three with pd‐PCC, and one with pd‐APCC; all major cases were covered using rFVIIa. Bleeding was no greater than expected compared with a non‐haemophilic population in all 25 minor procedures. In the major procedure group, there was no excessive bleeding in 40% of cases (6/15) and bleeding completely stopped in response to rFVIIa. For the remaining nine cases, bleeding response to rFVIIa was described as ‘markedly decreased’ or ‘decreased’ in 4/15 cases and ‘unchanged’ in 5/15 cases. Overall, efficacy of rFVIIa, based on final patient outcome, was 85%. One death occurred as a result of sepsis secondary to necrotizing fasciitis. Good control of haemostasis can be achieved with bypassing agents in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing minor EOS; rFVIIa was used as an effective bypassing agent, enabling EOS in patients undergoing minor and major procedures.     

Acquired haemophilia: management of bleeds and immune therapy to eradicate autoantibodies

Acquired haemophilia is a rare, but often severe bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies against a coagulation factor, usually factor VIII (FVIII). Between 1997 and 2004 we observed 14 patients (mean age of 78 years) with acquired haemophilia. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) for bleeds and the response to corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide to eradicate the offending autoantibodies. The most common clinical presentations were severe profuse bruising (12) and haematuria (5). Ten patients were classified as idiopathic. At the time of diagnosis all patients had a very low FVIII level, and one patient also showed factor IX < 1%. High levels of antibodies to FVIII varying from 10 to 1340 Bethesda units (BU) and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time were disclosed in all patients. Eight severe bleeds were treated with aPCC (FEIBA) at a dosage of 70 IU kg(-1) every 8 h until haemostasis. Ten patients received corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide as immunomodulatory therapy. Effective haemostasis was achieved in all bleeds after aPCC. Ten of 11 patients responded either completely or partially to the immunomodulatory regime within 6 months. Five patients achieved complete response (CR) whereas partial responses were seen in five patients. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was given to two patients in conventional doses and a CR was seen in one patient. aPCC is effective in treating acute bleeds in patients with acquired haemophilia with high inhibitor levels. The combination of oral corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide seems to be effective to eradicate the inhibitor.     

Prediction of the haemostatic effects of bypassing therapy using comprehensive coagulation assays in emicizumab prophylaxis-treated haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

In emicizumab prophylaxis, the concomitant therapy using bypassing agents (BPAs) is required for breakthrough bleeding and invasive procedures with attention to thrombotic complications. To predict coagulant effects of BPAs in emicizumab-treated patients with haemophilia A (PwHA) with inhibitor (PwHAwI), blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI (n = 8) and PwHA without inhibitor (n = 2) in phase 1/2 and HAVEN 1 study, spiked with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) ex vivo, and blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI-receiving BPAs were analysed by Ca²⁺-triggered rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and ellagic acid/tissue factor-triggered clot waveform analysis (CWA). Spiked aPCC, corresponded to 10–100 U/kg, markedly shortened ROTEM parameters beyond the normal range, while spiked rFVIIa, corresponded to 90–270 μg/kg, shortened them within near-normal range. Each of the spiked BPA-improved adjusted maximum coagulation velocity of CWA to within or near the normal range. In blood samples at post-infusion of aPCC (44–73 U/kg) or rFVIIa (79–93 μg/kg), the parameters of both assays improved to approximately the normal range. Taken together, ex vivo results of spiking tests in ROTEM and CWA, except aPCC spiking test in ROTEM, were relatively consistent with in vivo ones, and could usefully predict the coagulant effects of concomitant bypassing therapy for emicizumab-treated PwHAwI.     

Management of bleeding in acquired hemophilia A: results from the European Acquired Haemophilia (EACH2) Registry

Acquired hemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies to coagulation FVIII. Bleeding episodes at presentation are spontaneous and severe in most cases. Optimal hemostatic therapy is controversial, and available data are from observational and retrospective studies only. The EACH2 registry, a multicenter, pan-European, Web-based database, reports current patient management. The aim was to assess the control of first bleeding episodes treated with a bypassing agent (rFVIIa or aPCC), FVIII, or DDAVP among 501 registered patients. Of 482 patients with one or more bleeding episodes, 144 (30%) received no treatment for bleeding; 31 were treated with symptomatic therapy only. Among 307 patients treated with a first-line hemostatic agent, 174 (56.7%) received rFVIIa, 63 (20.5%) aPCC, 56 (18.2%) FVIII, and 14 (4.6%) DDAVP. Bleeding was controlled in 269 of 338 (79.6%) patients treated with a first-line hemostatic agent or ancillary therapy alone. Propensity score matching was applied to allow unbiased comparison between treatment groups. Bleeding control was significantly higher in patients treated with bypassing agents versus FVIII/DDAVP (93.3% vs 68.3%; P = .003). Bleeding control was similar between rFVIIa and aPCC (93.0%; P = 1). Thrombotic events were reported in 3.6% of treated patients with a similar incidence between rFVIIa (2.9%) and aPCC (4.8%).     

Assessment of individual dose utilization vs. physician prescribing recommendations for recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in paediatric and adult patients with congenital haemophilia and alloantibody inhibitors (CHwI): the Dosing Observational Study in Hemophilia (DOSE)

Recent data from the Dosing Observational Study in Hemophilia diary study has described home treatment with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in congenital haemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI). The current analysis compares prescribed and patient/caregiver‐reported rFVIIa administration in paediatric and adult CHwI patients in this study. Patients with ≥4 bleeding episodes within a 3‐month period prescribed rFVIIa as first‐line therapy for bleeding episodes were eligible. Patients/caregivers completed a diary for ≥90 days or until the patient experienced four bleeds. Initial, total and mean rFVIIa doses reported for each bleeding episode were calculated and compared with the physician‐prescribed doses. Of 52 enrolled patients (25 children; 27 adults), 39 (75%) completed the study. Children and adults had similar mean durations of bleeding episodes. Both patient groups were administered higher initial rFVIIa doses for joint bleeds than prescribed: median (range) 215.2 (74.1–400.0) mcg kg^?1 vs. 200.0 (61.0–270.0) mcg kg^?1 for children, and 231.3 (59.3–379.7) mcg kg^?1 vs. 123.0 (81.0–289.0) mcg kg^?1 for adults. The median infused dose for joint bleeds was higher in adults than children (175.2 vs. 148.0 mcg kg^?1), but children received significantly more doses per joint bleed than adults (median 6.5 vs. 3.0). The median total dose per joint bleed was higher in children than adults (1248.7 vs. 441.6). For children and adults, both initial and additional doses administered for bleeds were higher than prescribed. Children received higher total doses per bleed due to an increased number of infusions per bleed.     

On‐demand treatment of bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors: strategies for securing and maintaining predictable efficacy with recombinant activated factor VII

Summary. On‐demand therapy with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) can provide effective haemostasis for spontaneous bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. However, treatment approaches vary amongst physicians, positively or negatively affecting outcomes. A panel of physicians proposed recommendations for securing and maintaining predictable efficacy with rFVIIa, comparing these with ‘real‐life’ patient management, using a questionnaire circulated to other expert physicians from haemophilia care centres in Europe and the United States. For rFVIIa treatment of spontaneous bleeds in inhibitor patients, early intervention with the highest appropriate dose is recommended. Home‐based therapy can facilitate early intervention. If additional rFVIIa therapy is required after the initial dose, rFVIIa 90 μg kg^?1 may be administered at 2–3 h intervals. Treatment should be tailored to bleed site/severity, recognizing the advantages of appropriate adjunct therapy. Questionnaire results suggested that many respondents adopted strategies in line with the recommendations. Most (36/46) recommended initial therapy within 1 h of bleed onset. rFVIIa 270 μg kg^?1 was the most frequently prescribed/recommended initial dose for paediatric (aged ≤15 years; 22/44 respondents) and adult (aged >15 years; 23/44 respondents) patients. However, there may be opportunity for improved bleed management on occasion, with regard, for instance, to dosing and dose interval. To secure and maintain predictable efficacy with rFVIIa, judicious dose selection and treatment timing are important, together with adjunct therapy where necessary. As inhibitor patients present with different bleeding scenarios, a tailored treatment approach should be adopted.     

Bypass therapy assay testing as a strategy to reduce costs for treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Published studies suggest that bypass therapy assay testing can be used to predict treatment response and dosing requirements for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs of utilizing and not utilizing bypass therapy assay testing before treating mild‐to‐moderate bleeding episodes on‐demand in haemophilia patients with inhibitors from a US third‐party payer perspective. In our exploratory decision tree model, the average patient was assumed to be an adult weighing 75 kg. Based on existing head‐to‐head clinical trials, the efficacy of activated prothrombin complex (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was assumed to be equivalent and based on expert opinion of the haematologist in our study it was conservatively assumed that assay testing improves the efficacy of both the bypassing agents by 10%. Probabilistic and one‐way sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the results. Cost savings per bleeding episode were estimated at $6886 (95% CI = $4310–7978) for aPCC and $7647 (95% CI = $3134–10 388) for rFVIIa treatment. This translates in potential cost savings of 24.8% (95% CI = 15.5–28.8%) for aPCC use and 18.2% (95% CI = 8–24.7%) for rFVIIa use. Furthermore, if testing successfully predicts the optimum dose for concomitant therapy at the onset of bleeding, significant cost savings were observed compared with rFVIIa and aPCC therapies alone. Use of bypass therapy assay testing before treatment administration in haemophilia inhibitor patients can potentially reduce treatment costs significantly while optimizing dose and therapy response.     

Treatment patterns and cost-of-illness of severe haemophilia in patients with inhibitors in Germany

To evaluate current treatment patterns and resource utilization as well as related cost in the management of severe haemophilia patients with inhibitors in Germany, a cost-of-illness study was conducted. Generally, data were generated by structured literature search. Missing data were collected by expert interviews. All data were validated by a panel of German experts in haemophilia care. In Germany, immune tolerance therapy (ITT) is first-line therapy in inhibitor management for children in the initial year after inhibitor development, particularly for high responders (HR). In adult HR patients ITT is applied but to a remarkably lower extent than in children. To treat bleeding episodes, factor VIII (FVIII) is first-line therapy in low responders (LR). For paediatric HR patients, bleeds are mainly treated with recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa). In adult HR patients, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and rFVIIa are more equally distributed as treatment options. Treatment costs were calculated for paediatric patients (15 kg) and adult patients (75 kg) from third party payers' perspective. Cost for ITT ranges from Euro 70,290 (2 months; LR) to Euro 3 812,400 (24 months; with aPCC; HR) in a paediatric patient. For an adult patient ITT cost ranges from Euro 287,500 (6 months; LR) to Euro 17,253,000 (36 months; HR). For on average 12.5 acute bleeds, average annual treatment costs amount to Euro 77,000 for a child and Euro 354,000 for an adult. Assessing the results it has been taken into consideration that ITT can last longer and annual number of bleeds can be extremely higher than on average 12.5 episodes. This indicates more health care resource consumption in some patients.     

How we use recombinant activated Factor VII in patients with haemophilia A or B complicated by inhibitors

The management of bleeds in patients with haemophilia A or B complicated by inhibitors is complex. Recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven RT) is an established therapy in these patients. To develop a consensus‐based guide on the practical usage of rFVIIa in haemophilia complicated by inhibitors, nine expert haemophilia specialists from Australia and New Zealand developed practice points on the usage of rFVIIa, based on their experience and supported by published data. Practice points were developed for 13 key topics: control of acute bleeding; prophylaxis; surgical prophylaxis; control of breakthrough bleeding during surgery or treatment of acute bleeds; paediatric use; use in elderly; intracranial haemorrhage; immune tolerance induction; difficult bleeds; clinical monitoring of therapy; laboratory monitoring of therapy; concomitant antifibrinolytic medication; practical dosing. Access to home therapy with rFVIIa is important in allowing patients to administer treatment early in bleed management. In adults, 90–120 μg/kg is the favoured starting dose in most settings. Initial dosing using 90–180 μg/kg is recommended for children due to the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of rFVIIa. In the management of acute bleeds, 2‐hourly dosing is appropriate until bleeding is controlled, with concomitant antifibrinolytic medication unless contraindicated. The practice points provide guidance on the usage of rFVIIa for all clinicians involved in the management of haemophilia complicated by inhibitors.     

A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor: the FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study

The development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII is a serious complication of hemophilia. FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor-bypassing activity), an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), and NovoSeven, recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), are used as hemostatic bypassing agents in treating patients with inhibitors. The FENOC study was designed to test equivalence of the products in the treatment of ankle, knee, and elbow joint bleeding. A prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, equivalency design was used. The parameters of interest were the percentage of patients who reported efficacy in response to FEIBA and the percentage that reported efficacy in response to NovoSeven. A difference in these percentages of no more than 15% was determined to be a clinically acceptable magnitude for equivalence of the 2 products. The primary outcome was evaluation 6 hours after treatment. Data for 96 bleeding episodes contributed by 48 participants were analyzed. The criterion for declaring the 2 products equivalent at 6 hours was not met; however, the confidence interval of the difference in percentages of efficacy reported for each product only slightly exceeded the 15% boundary (-11.4%-15.7%), P=.059. FEIBA and NovoSeven appear to exhibit a similar effect on joint bleeds, although the efficacy between products is rated differently by a substantial proportion of patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00166309.