The persistent effects of unilateral pallidal and subthalamic deep brain stimulation on force control in advanced Parkinson's patients

The persistent effects of unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) on specific movement parameters produced by Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of unilateral GPi and STN DBS on the force-producing capabilities of PD patients during maximal efforts and functional bimanual dexterity. Clinical and biomechanical data were collected from 14 unilaterally implanted patients (GPi=7; STN=7), at least 13 months post-DBS surgery, during On and Off stimulation in the absence of medication. Unilateral DBS of either location produced a 33% improvement in UPDRS motor scores. Significant gains in maximum force production were present in both limbs during unimanual efforts. The greatest increase in maximum force, for both limbs, was under bimanual conditions. Force in the contralateral limb increased more than 30% during bimanual efforts while ipsilateral force increased by 25%. Unilateral DBS improved grasping force control and consistency of digit placement during the performance of a bimanual dexterity task. The clinical and biomechanical data indicate that unilateral DBS of GPi or STN results in persistent improvements in the control and coordination of grasping forces during maximal efforts and functional dexterous actions. Unilateral DBS implantation of either site should be considered an option for those patients in which bilateral procedures are contraindicated.     

Thalamic deep brain stimulation: comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement

BACKGROUND: Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is accepted as an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET) and the tremor of Parkinson disease (PD). There are, however, relatively little data concerning bilateral thalamic DBS and no thorough comparisons between the 2 methods. METHODS: To assess the relative benefit of a staged second contralateral DBS placement in patients with PD and ET, we compared preoperative baseline assessments with those at 3 months after the initial implantation, and again at 3 months after the second contralateral implantation. The assessments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for patients with PD (n = 8) and a modified Unified Tremor Rating Assessment for patients with ET (n = 13). The design included open and blinded (unknown activation status) assessments. RESULTS: Overall, after the second implantation, all specific measures assessing tremor contralateral to that side improved in patients with PD and ET, generally without sacrificing those contralateral to the first side implantation. Midline tremors (face and head) improved only after the second side implantation. In patients with ET, functional and subjective scores tended to further improve after the second placement; however, patients with PD had less subjective improvement. Hand tremor scores in patients with ET randomized to "on" stimulation improved from 6.7 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 1.2 (P<.005). The scores of patients with PD randomized to on stimulation improved from 9.3 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 0.5. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) Tremor scores did not change from baseline in those patients randomized to "off" stimulation in either group. Adverse events related to stimulation increased after the second implantation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic DBS is more effective than unilateral DBS at controlling bilateral appendicular and midline tremors of ET and PD. Despite this, overall functional disability only improved in patients with ET, possibly secondary to more problematic adverse events in patients with PD, especially balance problems. Bilateral DBS should be considered when unilateral DBS does not offer satisfactory benefit, especially in patients with ET.     

双侧丘脑底核脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病

目的 应用双侧丘脑底核脑深部电刺激（DBS）治疗难治性帕金森病（PD），并对其疗效作出评价。方法 对7例帕金森病患者采用磁共振导向立体定向及术中电生理验证方法，将刺激电极分别植入丘脑底核，采用同期或分期植入刺激发生器。术后1周用程控计算机在体外调速刺激参数，以达到最佳疗效。结果 6例患者术后均获得了显著的疗效。震颤完全消失，肌强直、步态、姿障碍以及药物所致的并发症明显,面时多巴胺类药物用量明显减少，1例曾接爱双侧丘脑腹中间核及一侧苍白球毁损后的患者只得到了轻度改善。结论 DBS法治疗中晚期PD，具有安全，副作用可逆转的优点，且可根据患者的不同状况及病情发展调节刺激参数达到最佳症状控制，完全控制震颤，明显改善肌张力障碍、步态、资势等运动障碍及药物所致的并发症，另外多巴胺类药物的用量也明显减少。     

脑深部电刺激对帕金森病二次手术的临床应用价值

目的探讨帕金森病(Parkinson'sdisease,PD)毁损术后再行脑深部电刺激术(deepbrainstimulation,DBS)的可行性、靶点选择、术中电生理学特点和治疗结果。方法应用MRI和微电极记录技术进行靶点定位,对13例毁损术后的PD患者行DBS手术,其中7例曾行单侧苍白球毁损术(posteroventralpallidotomy,PVP),5例曾行单侧丘脑毁损术,1例曾行双侧丘脑及左侧苍白球毁损术。DBS的靶点包括单侧丘脑底核(subthalamicnucleus,STN)6例,单侧丘脑腹中间核(ventralintermediatnucleus,Vim)1例,双侧STN4例,一侧STN及对侧苍白球(globuspallidusinternus,Gpi)2例。结果DBS对毁损术后的PD患者症状有不同程度的改善,其中单侧毁损术后行双侧DBS效果最明显。术后3个月的UPDRS运动及ADL评分较术前明显减少(P<0.05或0.01),美多巴的用量明显减少(P<0.05),无新的手术合并症。结论曾行毁损术的PD患者如面临二次手术,可以选择DBS手术,以双侧STN的DBS效果最好,并可减少药物用量,不加重原有的术后并发症。     

Unilateral vs. bilateral STN DBS effects on working memory and motor function in Parkinson disease

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) can reduce working memory while improving motor function in Parkinson disease (PD), but findings are variable. One possible explanation for this variability is that the effects of bilateral STN DBS on working memory function depend in part on functional or disease asymmetry. The goal of this study was to determine the relative contributions of unilateral DBS to the effects seen with bilateral DBS. Motor (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III, UPDRS) and working memory function (Spatial Delayed Response, SDR) were measured in 49 PD patients with bilateral STN DBS while stimulators were Both-off, Left-on, Right-on and Both-on in a randomized, double-blind manner. Patients were off PD medications overnight. Effects of unilateral DBS were compared to effects of bilateral STN DBS. Mean UPDRS and SDR responses to Left-on vs. Right-on conditions did not differ (p>.20). However, improvement in contralateral UPDRS was greater and SDR performance was more impaired by unilateral DBS in the more affected side of the brain than in the less affected side of the brain (p=.008). The effect of unilateral DBS on the more affected side on contralateral UPDRS and SDR responses was equivalent to that of bilateral DBS. These results suggest that motor and working memory function respond to unilateral STN DBS differentially depending on the asymmetry of motor symptoms.     

刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的比较

目的比较脑深部刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的优缺点。方法69例帕金森病病人进行了双侧手术治疗,其中同期双侧丘脑底核(STN)脑深部刺激术(DBS)11例,同期一侧苍白球腹后部毁损术(PVP),另一侧STNDBS3例,分期一侧PVP或腹中间核(Vim)毁损术、另一侧STN或VimDBS9例;分期双侧PVP或Vim毁损术41例,同期双侧PVP5例。平均随访9.3个月。结果UPDRS评分显示刺激术和毁损术均能显著改善对侧肢体震颤、僵硬和运动迟缓症状,双侧刺激术还能改善步态和姿势症状,但双侧毁损术可加重语言、吞咽及流涎等症状,并发症较高。结论双侧DBS是具有双侧症状的帕金森病病人手术治疗的最佳术式,双侧毁损术并发症较高,应严格慎重采用。     

Two‐year follow‐up on the effect of unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in highly asymmetric Parkinson's disease

Although bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) provides greater relief from the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) than unilateral STN DBS, it has been suggested that unilateral STN DBS may be a reasonable treatment option in selected patients, especially those with highly asymmetric PD. In previous studies on the effect of unilateral STN DBS, the asymmetry of PD symptoms was not prominent and the mean follow‐up durations were only 3 to 12 months. In this study, we report our findings in a series of 8 patients with highly asymmetric PD who were treated with unilateral STN DBS and were followed for 24 months. Serial changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score and subscores in the ipsilateral, contralateral, and axial body parts were analyzed. Unilateral STN DBS improved the UPDRS motor score and the contralateral subscore in the on‐medication state for 5 nonfluctuating patients and in the off‐medication state for 3 fluctuating patients. However, the ipsilateral subscore progressively worsened and reversed asymmetry became difficult to manage, which led to compromised medication and stimulator adjustment. At 24 months, all the patients were considering the second‐side surgery. Our results suggest that bilateral STN DBS should be considered even in highly asymmetric PD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Bilateral effects of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: A case report

A recent study has proved that unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus has bilateral effects. However, it is still unclear whether unilateral ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) DBS exerts exclusively contralateral or bilateral effects on tremor. Previous studies demonstrated a clinically irrelevant improvement on the nontarget side after thalamic stimulator implantation, which was considered to be solely the result of mechanical effects. We report here the case of a 55‐year‐old woman in whom unilateral thalamic DBS can stop the disabling postural‐kinetic tremor in both hands. Simultaneous surface electromyography (sEMG), accelerometry, and video recordings were obtained to evaluate the underlying mechanism. After the right Vim DBS was turned off, moderate rest tremor appeared in both hands accompanied by bilateral bursts on sEMG. Because right hand tremor cannot simply reflect the mechanical overflow of the left side, the bilateral improvement caused by right Vim DBS is probably due to an active tremor reduction in this particular case. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. This surgical technique is applied to three brain targets: the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), the globus pallidus internus (Gpi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Vim DBS improves contralateral parkinsonian tremor. STN and GPi DBS improve contralateral bradykinesia, rigidity, parkinsonian tremor and also levodopa-induced dyskinesia. There is little comparative data between bilateral STN and bilateral GPi procedures but the improvement with bilateral STN DBS seems more pronounced than with bilateral GPi DBS. Moreover, only STN BDS allows a significant decrease of antiparkinsonian medication. The other advantage of STN over GPi DBS is the lower consumption of current. The DBS procedure contrary to ablative surgery has the unique advantage of reversibility and adjustability over time. Patients with no behavioral, mood and cognitive impairments benefit the most from bilateral STN DBS. The stimulation-induced adverse effects related to DBS are reversible and adjustable. More specific adverse effects related do hardware are: disconnection, lead breaking, erosion or infection. The disadvantage of DBS is a relatively high cost. The setting of stimulation parameters to achieve the best clinical result may be very time-consuming. Most authors agree that DBS is a safer and more favorable procedure than ablative surgery.     

Unilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation contralateral to thalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease

The effects of unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation contralateral to thalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease (PD) have not been previously reported. We are reporting a patient who developed left arm tremor in 1994, at age 62, as her first PD symptom. She underwent right thalamic DBS surgery in 1999 that resulted in complete resolution of left arm tremor. Her PD symptoms progressed and she developed severe motor fluctuations and disabling dyskinesias. In 2003, she underwent left STN electrode implantation. Left STN stimulation improved contralateral motor scores in the medication OFF state, and allowed for reduced medication doses and less dyskinesia. However, there was no significant improvement in activities of daily living (ADL), motor scores in the medication ON state, gait, or postural stability.     

Unilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improves sleep quality in Parkinson's disease

BackgroundSleep disturbances are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is superior to best medical therapy in the treatment of motor symptoms in advanced PD, and observational studies suggest that bilateral STN DBS improves sleep in these patients as well. Unilateral STN DBS also improves motor function in PD, but its effects on sleep have not been extensively investigated.MethodsWe report the effects of unilateral STN DBS on subjective sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in 53 consecutive PD patients. These subjects completed the PSQI prior to surgery and at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome measure was the change in the global PSQI at 6 months post-operatively versus the pre-operative baseline, measured with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).ResultsPatients with PD who underwent unilateral STN DBS had a significant improvement in PSQI at 6 months post-operatively (baseline 9.30 ± 0.56 (mean ± SEM), 6 months: 7.93 ± 0.56, p = 0.013). Supplemental analyses showed that subjects selected for STN DBS placed on the right had worse baseline subjective sleep quality and more improvement in PSQI at 6 months compared to patients who received left STN DBS.ConclusionThis prospective case series study provides evidence that unilateral STN DBS improves subjective sleep quality in patients with PD at up to 6 months post-operatively as measured by the PSQI.     

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in a patient with Parkinson disease and essential tremor

BACKGROUND: The preferred surgical target for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) is either the internal globus pallidus or the subthalamic nucleus (STN); the target for treatment of essential tremor (ET) is the thalamic subnucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim). Some patients with PD have coexistent ET, and the identification of a single surgical target to treat both parkinsonian motor symptoms and ET would be of practical importance. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of the STN target in deep brain stimulator (DBS) surgery to treat PD motor symptoms and the action-postural tremor of ET. DESIGN: Case report. PATIENT: A 62-year-old man had a greater than 30-year history of action-postural tremor in both hands, well controlled with beta-blockers for more than 20 years. He developed resting tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity on his right side that progressed to his left side during the past 10 years. Dopaminergic medication improved his rigidity and bradykinesia, with only mild improvement of his resting tremor and no effect on his action-postural tremor. INTERVENTIONS: Left pallidotomy followed by placement of a left DBS in the Vim and subsequent placement of a right STN DBS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Control of symptoms of PD and ET. RESULTS: The left pallidotomy controlled the patient's parkinsonian motor symptoms on the right side of his body, but did not affect the action-postural component of his tremor. The symptoms on the left side of the body, including both an action-postural and a resting tremor (as well as the rigidity and bradykinesia), improved after placement of a single right STN DBS. CONCLUSION: Placement of an STN DBS should be considered as the procedure of choice for surgical treatment of patients with a combination of PD and ET.     

Combined deep brain stimulation and thalamotomy for tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson’s disease, the long-term suppression of tremor is still a challenging issue. We report two patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease (PD) treated with unilateral thalamotomy of the ventralis intermedius nucleus (Vim) combined with the subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA)-DBS. One year after the surgery, thalamotomy of the area from the Vim to the PSA showed improvement not only in tremor but also in rigidity and akinesia. PSA- or STN-DBS with low intensity stimulation eliminated residual PD symptoms. Combined DBS and thalamotomy may provide long-term improvement of the majority of PD symptoms using lower therapeutic stimulation voltages.     

Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: midline tremor control

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) for management of midline tremor (head, voice, tongue, trunk) in patients with essential tremor. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of tremor at baseline (presurgical), and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. METHODS: A clinical series of 22 individuals undergoing staged, bilateral DBS for treatment of essential tremor. The tremor rating scale was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Midline tremor showed significant improvement with stimulation "on" at nearly every postoperative interval when compared with stimulation "off" and with baseline tremor. Bilateral stimulation was associated with a significant incremental improvement in midline tremor control compared with unilateral stimulation: average "stimulation on" percentage change in midline tremor from the unilateral to bilateral period was 81%. Head and voice tremor showed the most consistent improvement. Among those requiring a change in stimulation parameters because of side effects, dysarthria, disequilibrium, motor disturbances, and paraesthesiae were the most common. Dysarthria was more common with bilateral (n = 6; 27%) than with unilateral (n = 0) stimulation. Stimulation parameters remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Nine of 44 leads placed (20%) required subsequent repositioning or replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral thalamic stimulation significantly improves midline tremor, and subsequent bilateral thalamic stimulation offers an additional incremental improvement in midline tremor control.     

Mood and motor effects of thalamic deep brain stimulation surgery for essential tremor

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of unilateral and bilateral ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on mood and motor function. Methods: Thirty‐one consecutive medication refractory patients with essential tremor who underwent unilateral or bilateral Vim DBS at University of Florida and returned for at least 6 ‐month follow‐up completed the Visual Analog Mood (VAMS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) before and after surgery. We excluded all patients who were implanted at other institutions. Results: The tense subscale of the VAMS improved significantly in both the unilateral and bilateral DBS groups (P < 0.001). On the VAMS afraid subscale, only the bilateral group trended toward improvement (P = 0.075). There were no significant changes for either group for the happy, confused, sad, angry, energetic or tired VAMS scores. TRS subscale scores all improved after unilateral and bilateral Vim DBS surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Feelings of tenseness, tremor severity and ADLs improved following unilateral or bilateral Vim DBS for ET.     

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease after successful pallidotomy: clinical and electrophysiological observations.

Unilateral pallidotomy is an effective treatment for contralateral parkinsonism and dyskinesia, yet symptoms progress in many patients. Little is known about whether such patients obtain a useful response to subsequent bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores, medication requirements, and dyskinesias were measured. Clinical outcomes were compared to patients with de novo STN DBS. Neuronal recordings were performed. STN DBS resulted in a significant reduction in UPDRS Motor scores (42.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9-57.4; P = 0.03), comparable with de novo STN DBS surgery (41%; 95% CI, 26-46%; P < 0.001). There was also less change in dyskinesia duration and disability scores (P = 0.017, 0.005). There were no side-to-side differences clinically or in the STN neuronal firing rates and patterns. Bilateral STN DBS is safe and efficacious in improving motor symptoms in patients with prior pallidotomy.     

Mechanisms of unilateral STN-DBS in patients with Parkinson’s disease

Bilateral symptoms and signs of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are often improved by unilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). However, the mechanism for such bilateral effects is unknown. This study was intended to examine effects of unilateral STN-DBS using positron emission computed tomography (PET) and to elucidate mechanisms for bilateral improvement achieved by unilateral stimulation. We conducted ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG) and ¹⁸F-fluorodopa (¹⁸F-DOPA ) PET scans in PD patients whose bilateral limb symptoms and axial symptoms were improved by unilateral DBS. Two scans were performed in each PET study: when DBS was on and off. We compared those images using statistic parametric mapping (SPM) 99. The significant clinical improvement obtained by unilateral DBS was shown as improvements in bilateral motor limb, axial, and gait subscores of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS). Moreover, ¹⁸FDG PET revealed significant metabolic increases in the ipsilateral ventrolateral thalamic areas and metabolic decrease at the contralateral globus pallidus interna (GPi). In contrast, ¹⁸F-DOPA PET showed no significant differences between DBS on and off. Ipsilateral thalamic activation might induce ipsilateral motor cortical activation, which explains the improvement of contralateral limb symptoms. Furthermore, deactivation of the contralateral GPi might disinhibit the thalamus and contralateral motor cortex, which explains reduction of ipsilateral limb symptoms. These results suggest the mechanisms for bilateral improvement achieved by unilateral DBS.     

脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病和特发性震颤的近期和远期疗效

自1987年以后,脑深部电刺激(deep brain stimulation,DBS)成为治疗难治性帕金森病和特发性震颤的主要外科手段。刺激的靶点最先为丘脑腹侧中间核(nucleus ventero-intermedius,Vim)。由于Vim DBS只能缓解震颤,而对于帕金森病的其他核心症状以及多巴长期应用后的不良反应,如运动波动和异动症疗效不显著,1990年后治疗PD的靶点转移到丘脑底核(subthalamic nucleus,STN)和苍白球内侧部(interal globus pallidus,GPi),上述问题在这两个靶点得到显著改善。Vim DBS仍然为治疗特发性震颤的位点。本文就这3个靶点的持续电刺激在治疗帕金森病和特发性震颤的近期和远期疗效等进行评述。     

Thalamic deep brain stimulation in the treatment of essential tremor

Background and purposeQuality of life can be severely impaired by essential tremor (ET) being the main cause of the patient's disability. The authors present a group of ET patients treated with deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim DBS). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Vim DBS in the treatment of ET.Material and methodsBetween 2006 and 2009, 8 female and 10 male ET patients were treated with Vim DBS. Mean age at implantation was 63 ± 15 years. ET lasted from 4 to 30 years (mean 12 years). Clinical condition of the group was evaluated before surgery and 3 months after implantation with spirography (spiral drawings), the modified Fahn (Tremor Rating Scale, TRS) scale, and the modified ADL (Activity of Daily Living) scale. The Vim was localized with CT and MRI. The procedures of implantation were performed under local and general anaesthesia. A bilateral procedure was performed in 11 cases and a unilateral procedure was performed in 7 cases.ResultsThe therapeutic effect of DBS was maintained at the follow-up in the third month following surgery. Mean contralateral limb tremor reduction was 79%. Head tremor reduction was reported by 75% of patients in the bilateral Vim DBS subgroup and 50% of patients in the unilateral Vim DBS subgroup. Mean ADL score improved by 61%.ConclusionsVim DBS is a safe and effective method of ET treatment. Vim DBS improves activities of daily living of ET patients.     

Computerized posturography balance assessment of patients with bilateral ventralis intermedius nuclei deep brain stimulation.

Bilateral ventralis intermedius nuclei (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves tremor in patients with both essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD). In each condition, patients have individually noted both subjective improvement and worsening in balance. Computerized posturography (CP) is able to quantify some aspects of balance. Twenty-one patients (8 with PD and 13 with ET) with bilateral Vim DBS were recruited to undergo randomized-order identical CP testing (EquiTest system) while their DBS devices were both activated and deactivated. One PD patient could not complete any OFF assessment and is not included. Three PD patients could not tolerate portions of the OFF testing. Overall, sensory organization testing was improved by DBS activation in conditions that involved quiet standing with eyes open with no motion of the support surface, or with sway-referenced support surface motion, but worsened during quiet standing with eyes closed only in ET patients. Falls lessened with activation in ET patients. Motor control testing was not changed. Bilateral Vim DBS activation mostly improved balance, but may modestly worsen other specific features.