Mechanisms of action of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists

Recent studies of the pathophysiology of migraine provide evidence that the headache phase is associated with multiple physiologic actions. These actions include the release of vasoactive neuropeptides by the trigeminovascular system, vasodilation of intracranial extracerebral vessels, and increased nociceptive neurotransmission within the central trigeminocervical complex. The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists, collectively known as triptans, are a major advance in the treatment of migraine. The beneficial effects of the triptans in patients with migraine are related to their multiple mechanisms of action at sites implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine. These mechanisms are mediated by 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors and include vasoconstriction of painfully dilated cerebral blood vessels, inhibition of the release of vasoactive neuropeptides by trigeminal nerves, and inhibition of nociceptive neurotransmission. The high affinity of the triptans for 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors and their favorable pharmacologic properties contribute to the beneficial effects of these drugs, including rapid onset of action, effective relief of headache and associated symptoms, and low incidence of adverse effects.     

Intracranial nociception

Understanding intracranial nociceptive innervation is essential to understand the pathophysiology of headaches. Our knowledge about human intracranial nociception comes from sparse observations during neurosurgical procedures performed in awake patients, from human anatomical studies and from experimental studies in animals. In this article we review the anatomical and functional organization underlying nociceptive innervation. Intracranial nociception is mainly mediated by the trigeminal system, except in the posterior cranial fossa that is innervated by the first cervical roots. For decades, the dura mater, its vessels and major cerebral blood vessels were considered as the only intracranial pain-sensitive structures. Recent animal and human studies have suggested that smaller brain arteries and potentially pia mater might also be pain sensitive. Nociceptive neurons innervating intracranial blood vessels project via the ophthalmic division (V1) to the trigeminal ganglion and store several neurotransmitters including glutamate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The trigeminal ganglion, root and brainstem nuclei have a specific topographic and functional somatotopy. Progressive transition between the trigeminal spinal nucleus and the dorsal horn of the cervical spinal cord, and convergence of nociceptive inputs from the face, intracranial structures and the occipital area on the so-called “trigemino-cervical complex” may explain some headache features, relations between facial and occipital pain, and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation in headache. The specific anatomic organization of the trigeminal system, from the primary-order neuron in the trigeminal ganglion, to the second-order neuron is the trigeminal nuclei, may explain a part of the various characteristics of headaches.     

Sensitization and pain

Migraine is often accompanied with signs of increased intracranial and extracranial mechanical sensitivities. The prevailing view today is that migraine headache is a neurovascular disorder with intracranial origin and involvement of meningeal blood vessels and their pain nerve fibers. Allodynia, defined as perception of pain following not painful stimulation, is a common clinical feature in various pain syndromes, and as part of migraine pain, it can be considered an indicator of trigeminal neural network sensitization. The cutaneous allodynia that accompanies the migraine headache in a large percentage of patients may be considered the clinical expression of central nervous system sensitization and is characterized by pain provoked by stimulation of the skin that would ordinarily not produce pain. An altered codification process of sensory impulses in the brainstem, in particular by the nucleus caudalis trigeminalis, may justify the temporal aspects and symptoms in the course of migraine attack.     

CGRP-receptor antagonism in migraine treatment

Primary headaches are among the most prevalent neurological disorders, afflicting up to 16% of the adult population. Associated pain originates from intracranial blood vessels that are innervated by sensory nerves storing several neurotransmitters. In primary headaches, there is a clear association between the headache and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) but not with other neuronal messengers. The specific purpose of this review is to describe CGRP in the human cranial circulation and to elucidate a possible role for a specific antagonist in the treatment of primary headaches. Acute treatment by administration of a triptan (5-HT(1B/1D) agonist) results in alleviation of the headache and normalization of the elevated CGRP level. The mechanism of action of triptans involves vasoconstriction of intracranial vessels and a presynaptic inhibitory effect of the trigeminal sensory nerves. The central role of CGRP in migraine and cluster headache pathophysiology has led to the search for small molecule CGRP antagonists, which would predictably have less cardiovascular side effects as compared to the triptans. The initial pharmacological profile of such a group of compounds has recently been disclosed. These compounds have high selectivity for human CGRP receptors and are reported to be efficacious in the relief of acute attacks of migraine.     

Pattern of intracranial and extracranial projections of trigeminal ganglion cells

The trigeminal sensory innervation of the major cerebral vessels is thought to carry the nociceptive information during a migraine headache, and this pain is usually referred to the forehead area. Using retrograde tracing techniques, we have described the distribution of sensory trigeminal cells that innervate the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the forehead. Nearest-neighbor analysis of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal ganglion revealed that cells innervating the forehead tend to be clumped around individual cells that innervate the MCA. An average of less than 1 cell per animal was found to project divergent collaterals to both areas. The close association of ganglion cell bodies innervating the cerebral vasculature and those innervating forehead areas may underlie the convergence of their central processes onto common brain-stem trigeminal nucleus cells, and thus the referral of headache pain. In contrast to the lack of ganglion cells with axonal collaterals to the cerebral vasculature and forehead, a significant population of cells that innervate the MCA also have collateral projections to other cerebral arterial branches (branches of the middle meningeal artery), as well as the surrounding dura. Thus, the innervation targets of individual trigeminal cells are very widespread intracranially (including arteries and dura), but separate cells in the ophthalmic division innervate extracranial targets.     

Migraine-update--current concepts of migraine pathogenesis]

The pathophysiology of migraine still remains unclear. However, abundant evidence in support of the view that migraine as an illness of the central nervous system has been accumulated. First, the hyperexitability in the brain is recognized even in the stage between attacks in migraineurs according to findings of transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques, MRI-BOLD studies or 31P SPECT examinations. Second, cortical spreading depression originating in the occipital cortex is more likely to be related to the aura. Third, sensitization of the trigeminal nerve system is substantially involved in process of headache pain in migraine. Fourth, clonic dysfunction of the priaqueductal gray matter in the brain stem may underlie the migraine pathogenesis. Thus, current concept of susceptibility of migraine is attributed to certain dysfunction of the deep brain structures such as the brain stem rather than the blood vessels in the brain or dura mater.     

The biology of serotonin receptors: focus on migraine pathophysiology and treatment

Serotonin receptors are highly heterogeneous and they have been regrouped within seven different families (5-HT1-5-HT7). With the exception of the 5-HT3 which is a ligand-gated ion channel, all others are G-protein coupled receptors with each family sharing structural, pharmacological and transductional characteristics. 5-HT receptors have been implicated in the regulation of several psychiatric and neurological disorders related to serotonergic neurotransmission, and specific receptor subtypes have recently been associated with either the pathogenesis or the treatment of migraine headache. In this respect, activation of vascular 5-HT2B and/or 5-HT7 receptors, possibly as a consequence of the sudden rise in 5-HT levels reported at the onset of a migraine attack, would hypothetically result in dilation of cerebral blood vessels and concomitant activation of sensory trigeminovascular afferents, hence initiating the manifestation of head pain. At this stage in the migraine process, activation of specific subtypes of 5-HT1 receptors has proven clinically effective in relieving migraine pain. Neural 5-HT1D and/or 5-HT1F receptors localized pre-junctionally on trigeminovascular afferents appear to mediate the triptan-induced inhibition of the neurogenic inflammatory response, with possible additional sites of action for brain penetrant 5-HT1 receptor agonists in inhibiting the transmission of pain centrally. In contrast, activation of vascular 5-HT1B receptors would constrict meningeal vessels hence recovering their pre-migraine diameter. The recent availability of subtype selective 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor agonists should allow a further test of the neural/vascular hypothesis and could possibly lead to antimigraine drugs with a safer cardiovascular profile.     

Localization of nerve growth factor receptor immunoreactivity in the trigeminal nucleus of kittens.

A monoclonal antibody raised against the human nerve growth factor receptor (NGFr) was used to map the distribution of NGFr-immunoreactivity (IR) in the trigeminal nuclear complex of 8- to 10-week-old, immature felines. Somata and fibers show NGFr-IR within the trigeminal ganglion and the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. NGFr-IR is also found in fibers within the trigeminal root entry zone, the spinal trigeminal tract, and in fibers and terminals within all the central trigeminal sensory nuclei. The NGFr-IR found within the trigeminal sensory nuclei typically occurs in circumscribed zones that vary in position for the different subnuclei. NGFr-IR is found in the dorsomedial and ventrolateral subdivisions of the main sensory nucleus, in the dorsomedial and occasionally in ventral positions within pars oralis, in dorsal and ventral regions within pars interpolaris, and primarily in outer lamina II with fibers that project to lamina V within pars caudalis/medullary dorsal horn. These results show some overlap with the central distribution of trigeminal primary afferent nociceptive fibers such as those found from the tooth pulp and overlap with the central distribution of such peptides as calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, but NGFr-IR is more restricted. Thus, it appears that NGFr-IR is associated with the endings of primary afferent fibers in the brain stem, and that these fibers may represent a certain subclass of primary afferent nociceptors. It is speculated that fibers showing NGFr-IR may have the ability to alter their response to peripheral deafferentation when compared to fibers lacking NGFr-IR.     

Magnetic resonance angiography in facial and other pain: neurovascular mechanisms of trigeminal sensation.

For much of the twentieth century migraine and cluster headache have been considered as vascular headaches whose pathophysiology was determined by changes in cranial vascular diameter. To examine nociceptive neural influences on the cranial circulation, the authors studied healthy volunteers' responses to injection of the pain-producing compound capsaicin in terms of the caliber of the internal carotid artery. The study was conducted using magnetic resonance angiographic techniques. Injection of capsaicin into the skin innervated by the ophthalmic (first) division of the trigeminal nerve elicited 40% +/- 27% (mean +/- SD) increase in vascular cross-sectional area in the right (ipsilateral) internal carotid artery when compared with the mean baseline ( P < 0.001). Injection of capsaicin into the skin of the chin to stimulate the mandibular (third) division of the trigeminal nerve and into the leg led to a similar pain perception and failed to produce any significant change in vessel caliber. The data suggest that there is a highly functionally organized, somatotopically congruent trigeminal innervation of the cranial vessels, with a potent vasodilator effect of the ophthalmic division on the large intracranial vessels. The data are consistent with the notion that pain drives changes in vessel caliber in migraine and cluster headache, not vice versa. These conditions therefore should be regarded as primary neurovascular headaches not as vascular headaches.     

5-Hydroxytryptamine and its role in migraine

Platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is diminished during migraine headache and the injection of reserpine, which releases 5-HT from body stores, induces a typical headache in migrainous subjects. The intravenous injection of 5-HT relieves established migraine headache, but causes side-effects of nausea, faintness, paraesthesia and dyspnoea. The 5-HT1-like agonist sumatriptan exerts the beneficial effects of 5-HT with minimal side-effects. Receptors for 5-HT are present in cranial arteries and are also widely distributed in the central nervous system, where they play a role in the neural control of the cranial circulation and endogenous pain control system. The pathophysiology of migraine involves interaction between these central pathways and cranial blood vessels. It is probable that many prophylactic agents exert their action by central 5-HT2 antagonism, whereas termination of an established attack of migraine depends upon constriction of cranial vessels mediated by 5-HT1 receptors.     

Sensitization of the Trigeminovascular Pathway: Perspective and Implications to Migraine Pathophysiology

Migraine headache is commonly associated with signs of exaggerated intracranial and extracranial mechanical sensitivities. Patients exhibiting signs of intracranial hypersensitivity testify that their headache throbs and that mundane physical activities that increase intracranial pressure (such as bending over or coughing) intensify the pain. Patients exhibiting signs of extracranial hypersensitivity testify that during migraine their facial skin hurts in response to otherwise innocuous activities such as combing, shaving, letting water run over their face in the shower, or wearing glasses or earrings (termed here cephalic cutaneous allodynia). Such patients often testify that during migraine their bodily skin is hypersensitive and that wearing tight cloth, bracelets, rings, necklaces and socks or using a heavy blanket can be uncomfortable and/or painful (termed her extracephalic cutaneous allodynia). This review summarizes the evidence that support the view that activation of the trigeminovascular pathway contribute to the headache phase of a migraine attack, that the development of throbbing in the initial phase of migraine is mediated by sensitization of peripheral trigeminovascular neurons that innervate the meninges, that the development of cephalic allodynia is propelled by sensitization of second-order trigeminovascular neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus which receive converging sensory input from the meninges as well as from the scalp and facial skin, and that the development of extracephalic allodynia is mediated by sensitization of third-order trigeminovascular neurons in the posterior thalamic nuclei which receive converging sensory input from the meninges, facial and body skin.     

Role of cortical spreading depression in the pathophysiology of migraine

A migraine is a recurring neurological disorder characterized by unilateral, intense, and pulsatile headaches. In one-third of migraine patients, the attacks are preceded by a visual aura, such as a slowly-propagating scintillating scotoma. Migraine aura is thought to be a result of the neurovascular phenomenon of cortical spreading depression (SD), a self-propagating wave of depolarization that spreads across the cerebral cortex. Several animal experiments have demonstrated that cortical SD causes intracranial neurogenic inflammation around the meningeal blood vessels, such as plasma protein extravasation and pro-inflammatory peptide release. Cortical SD has also been reported to activate both peripheral and central trigeminal nociceptive pathways. Although several issues remain to be resolved, recent evidence suggests that cortical SD could be the initial trigger of intracranial neurogenic inflammation, which then contributes to migraine headaches via subsequent activation of trigeminal afferents.     

Central connections of the trigeminal motor command system in the weakly electric Elephantnose fish (Gnathonemus petersii)

The highly mobile chin appendage of Gnathonemus petersii, the Schnauzenorgan, is used to actively probe the environment and is known to be a fovea of the electrosensory system. It receives an important innervation from both the trigeminal sensory and motor systems. However, little is known about the premotor control pathways that coordinate the movements of the Schnauzenorgan, or about central pathways originating from the trigeminal motor nucleus. The present study focuses on the central connections of the trigeminal motor system to elucidate premotor centers controlling Schnauzenorgan movements, with particular interest in the possible connections between the electrosensory and trigeminal systems. Neurotracer injections into the trigeminal motor nucleus revealed bilateral, reciprocal connections between the two trigeminal motor nuclei and between the trigeminal sensory and motor nuclei by bilateral labeling of cells and terminals. Prominent afferent input to the trigeminal motor nucleus originates from the nucleus lateralis valvulae, the nucleus dorsalis mesencephali, the cerebellar corpus C1, the reticular formation, and the Raphe nuclei. Retrogradely labeled cells were also observed in the central pretectal nucleus, the dorsal anterior pretectal nucleus, the tectum, the ventroposterior nucleus of the torus semicircularis, the gustatory sensory and motor nuclei, and in the hypothalamus. Labeled terminals, but not cell bodies, were observed in the nucleus lateralis valvulae and the reticular formation. No direct connections were found between the electrosensory system and the V motor nucleus but the central connections identified would provide several multisynaptic pathways linking these two systems, including possible efference copy and corollary discharge mechanisms.     

Cortical excitability in migraine: Contributions of magnetic resonance imaging

Migraine is characterized by symptoms related to cortical hyperexcitability such as photophobia, phonophobia, osmophobia and allodynia. One-third of migraineurs experience aura, whose neurophysiological substrate is thought to be cortical spreading depression (CSD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown the migraine aura to be characterized by cerebral hyperactivity/hyperperfusion followed by hypometabolism/hypoperfusion spreading along the occipital cortex with the same spatiotemporal organization as the experimentally triggered CSD. The link between migraine aura and headache remains undetermined. Neuroimaging studies have failed to show a leakage of the blood–brain barrier, which was suspected to occur during CSD and to cause the stimulation of trigeminal nociceptive receptors. However, recent studies have highlighted the involvement of neuroglial inflammation and other studies have suggested that a common central network plays a role in the link between CSD and migraine pain. Finally, MRI has made it possible to study the contribution of metabolites such as glutamic acid, γ-amino-butyric acid and sodium in the pathophysiology of hyperexcitability in migraine.     

The trigeminovascular system in humans: pathophysiologic implications for primary headache syndromes of the neural influences on the cerebral circulation.

Primary headache syndromes, such as cluster headache and migraine, are widely described as vascular headaches, although considerable clinical evidence suggests that both are primarily driven from the brain. The shared anatomical and physiologic substrate for both of these clinical problems is the neural innervation of the cranial circulation. Functional imaging with positron emission tomography has shed light on the genesis of both syndromes, documenting activation in the midbrain and pons in migraine and in the hypothalamic gray in cluster headache. These areas are involved in the pain process in a permissive or triggering manner rather than as a response to first-division nociceptive pain impulses. In a positron emission tomography study in cluster headache, however, activation in the region of the major basal arteries was observed. This is likely to result from vasodilation of these vessels during the acute pain attack as opposed to the rest state in cluster headache, and represents the first convincing activation of neural vasodilator mechanisms in humans. The observation of vasodilation was also made in an experimental trigeminal pain study, which concluded that the observed dilation of these vessels in trigeminal pain is not inherent to a specific headache syndrome, but rather is a feature of the trigeminal neural innervation of the cranial circulation. Clinical and animal data suggest that the observed vasodilation is, in part, an effect of a trigeminoparasympathetic reflex. The data presented here review these developments in the physiology of the trigeminovascular system, which demand renewed consideration of the neural influences at work in many primary headaches and, thus, further consideration of the physiology of the neural innervation of the cranial circulation. We take the view that the known physiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms of the systems involved dictate that these disorders should be collectively regarded as neurovascular headaches to emphasize the interaction between nerves and vessels, which is the underlying characteristic of these syndromes. Moreover, the syndromes can be understood only by a detailed study of the cerebrovascular physiologic mechanisms that underpin their expression.     

The PACAP receptor: A novel target for migraine treatment

The origin of migraine pain has not yet been clarified, but accumulating data point to neuropeptides present in the perivascular space of cranial vessels as important mediators of nociceptive input during migraine attacks. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is present in sensory trigeminal neurons and may modulate nociception at different levels of the nervous system. Human experimental studies have shown that PACAP-38 infusion induces marked dilatation of extracerebral vessels and delayed migraine-like attacks in migraine patients. PACAP selectively activates the PAC₁ receptor, which suggests a possible signaling pathway implicated in migraine pain. This review summarizes the current evidence supporting the involvement of PACAP in migraine pathophysiology and the PAC₁ receptor as a possible novel target for migraine treatment.     

Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by a serotonergic antimigraine drug.

We have investigated the regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release from trigeminal neurons by the serotonergic antimigraine drug sumatriptan. Serum levels of the neuropeptide CGRP are elevated during migraine. Treatment with the drug sumatriptan returns CGRP levels to normal coincident with the alleviation of headache. However, despite this clinical efficacy, the cellular target and mechanism of sumatriptan action are not well understood beyond the pharmacology of its recognition of the 5-HT1 class of serotonin receptors. We have used cultured trigeminal neurons to demonstrate that sumatriptan can directly repress CGRP secretion from sensory neurons. The stimulated secretion in response to depolarization or inflammatory agents was inhibited, but not the basal secretion rate. Unexpectedly, sumatriptan did not lower cAMP levels, in contrast to the classical role ascribed to the 5-HT1 receptors. Instead, activation of 5-HT1 receptors caused a slow and remarkably prolonged increase in intracellular calcium. The inhibition of CGRP secretion is attenuated by the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid, suggesting that sumatriptan action is mediated by calcium-recruited phosphatases. These results suggest that 5-HT1 agonists may block a deleterious feedback loop in migraine at the trigeminal neurons and provide a general mechanism by which this class of drugs can attenuate stimulated neuropeptide release.     

Understanding migraine: Potential role of neurogenic inflammation

Neurogenic inflammation, a well-defined pathophysiologial process is characterized by the release of potent vasoactive neuropeptides, predominantly calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and neurokinin A from activated peripheral nociceptive sensory nerve terminals (usually C and A delta-fibers). These peptides lead to a cascade of inflammatory tissue responses including arteriolar vasodilation, plasma protein extravasation, and degranulation of mast cells in their peripheral target tissue. Neurogenic inflammatory processes have long been implicated as a possible mechanism involved in the pathophysiology of various human diseases of the nervous system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, urogenital tract, and skin. The recent development of several innovative experimental migraine models has provided evidence suggestive of the involvement of neuropeptides (SP, neurokinin A, and CGRP) in migraine headache. Antidromic stimulation of nociceptive fibers of the trigeminal nerve resulted in a neurogenic inflammatory response with marked increase in plasma protein extravasation from dural blood vessels by the release of various sensory neuropeptides. Several clinically effective abortive antimigraine medications, such as ergots and triptans, have been shown to attenuate the release of neuropeptide and neurogenic plasma protein extravasation. These findings provide support for the validity of using animal models to investigate mechanisms of neurogenic inflammation in migraine. These also further strengthen the notion of migraine being a neuroinflammatory disease. In the clinical context, there is a paucity of knowledge and awareness among physicians regarding the role of neurogenic inflammation in migraine. Improved understanding of the molecular biology, pharmacology, and pathophysiology of neurogenic inflammation may provide the practitioner the context-specific feedback to identify the novel and most effective therapeutic approach to treatment. With this objective, the present review summarizes the evidence supporting the involvement of neurogenic inflammation and neuropeptides in the pathophysiology and pharmacology of migraine headache as well as its potential significance in better tailoring therapeutic interventions in migraine or other neurological disorders. In addition, we have briefly highlighted the pathophysiological role of neurogenic inflammation in various other neurological disorders.     

5-HT1 receptors in migraine pathophysiology and treatment

Migraine is a frequent paroxysmal headache disorder of unknown aetiology. Genetic factors may control attack frequency and possibly attack severity. Serotonin_1D (5-HT_1Dβ) receptors have a prominent position within the final common pathway of the mechanisms involved in the headache and associated symptoms. Stimulation of these receptors by selective 5-HT_1Dβ receptor agonists such as sumatriptan and newer compounds including MK-462 and 311C90, rapidly and fully blocks the symptoms of the headache phase. The efficacy depends on factors such as timing of administration during or before the headache, speed of initial rise of drug plasma levels, and possibly degree of brain penetration. All agonists at S-HT_1Dβ receptors share a short duration of action resulting in recurrence of the headache symptoms within 24 h in about one-third of attacks in clinical trials. The risk for headache recurrence seems patient dependent: about 10% of patients treating multiple attacks experience headache recurrence in every treated attack, whereas 40% never experience recurrence. These differences are not related to simple pharmacokinetic differences between patients or drugs. Increasing plasma half-life of the drug will most likely not reduce the risk of recurrence. “Breakthrough of peripheral suppressive effect” with an ongoing “central migraine generator”, rather than the occurrence of a new attack, seems to be the most likely underlying mechanism for headache recurrence. In a minority of, possibly predisposed, patients, use of sumatriptan may induce increase of attack frequency. Four mechanisms have been suggested for the antimigraine action of 5-HT_1Dβ receptor agonists: (1) vasoconstriction of cranial, most likely meningeal and dural blood vessels; (2) inhibition of release of vasoactive neuropeptides from perivascular trigeminal nerve terminals within dura mater and meninges; (3) blockade of trigeminal nerve terminal depolarization; and (4) central inhibition within the trigeminal nucleus caudatus in the brainstem. Which of these mechanisms is the most important, and whether or not vasoconstrictor action is necessary for antimigraine efficacy, is currently under extensive investigation. At this point all drugs with proven antimigraine efficacy share the ability to contract blood vessels and thus all feature also the potential risk of causing vasoconstriction of coronary vessels. In relation herewith, major efforts are put into the search for “the antimigraine receptor” and which receptor subtype mediates which action of sumatriptan-like drugs. At this point, the 5-HT_1Dβ receptor subtype is thought to mediate vasoconstriction. Some investigators feel that the 5-HT_1Dα receptor subtype mediates the neuronal effects of sumatriptan, while others are much less convinced about the physiological role of this subtype of receptor. Further research into receptor subtype specificity and affinity of compounds may promote the development of even better antimigraine drugs.     

Co-localization of 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) receptors and glutamate in trigeminal ganglia in rats.

Anti-migraine triptan drugs are 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists which are thought to block the neurotransmitter/neuropeptide release from sensory nerve terminals and directly constrict blood vessel smooth muscles. In the present study, we have investigated the anatomical basis for a possible modulation of glutamate release from trigeminal ganglion neurons by 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists and by 5-HT1F receptor agonists, using double immunohistochemical staining technique in the rat. The majority of 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D or 5-HT1F receptor positive neurons were also glutamate positive, but both 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D or 5-HT1F receptor single-labeled and glutamate single-labeled neurons were observed. These results suggest that 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) receptor agonists may modulate glutamate release, and that one mechanism of their anti-migraine action could be the blockade of glutamate release.