Mutations in core nucleotide sequence of hepatitis B virus correlate with fulminant and severe hepatitis.

Infection with hepatitis B virus leads to a wide spectrum of liver injury, including self-limited acute hepatitis, fulminant hepatitis, and chronic hepatitis with progression to cirrhosis or acute exacerbation to liver failure, as well as an asymptomatic chronic carrier state. Several studies have suggested that the hepatitis B core antigen could be an immunological target of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. To investigate the reason why the extreme immunological attack occurred in fulminant hepatitis and severe exacerbation patients, the entire precore and core region of hepatitis B virus DNA was sequenced in 24 subjects (5 fulminant, 10 severe fatal exacerbation, and 9 self-limited acute hepatitis patients). No significant change in the nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid residue was noted in the nine self-limited acute hepatitis patients. In contrast, clustering changes in a small segment of 16 amino acids (codon 84-99 from the start of the core gene) in all seven adr subtype infected fulminant and severe exacerbation patients was found. A different segment with clustering substitutions (codon 48-60) was also found in seven of eight adw subtype infected fulminant and severe exacerbation patients. Of the 15 patients, 2 lacked precore stop mutation which was previously reported to be associated with fulminant hepatitis. These data suggest that these core regions with mutations may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hepatitis B viral disease, and such mutations are related to severe liver damage.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

It is estimated that there are millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within human genome and there are likely to explain much of the genetic diversity of individuals. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is etiologically associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 80% of cases, and is the dominant cause of death among HBV carriers. Among patients with chronic HBV infection, family history is a known risk factor for the development of HCC; therefore, genetic factors are likely to modify the risk of HCC. However, the genetic factors that determine progression to HCC remain mostly to be investigated. In this review, we discussed that the natural history of HBV infection and host genetic factors related to HCC, study design and target gene selection for the detection of SNPs related to the occurrence of HCC. Also, we reviewed that several SNPs or haplotypes, which were reportedly associated with increased or reduced risk of HCC occurrence in patients with chronic HBV infection. Screening of these polymorphisms might be useful in clinical practice to stratify the lower or higher risk group for HCC and might modify the design of HCC surveillance programs in patients with chronic HBV infection, if further genetic susceptibilities are identified.     

Detection of pre-C and core region mutants of hepatitis B virus in chronic hepatitis B virus carriers.

We analyzed the pre-C and core region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by a polymerase chain reaction in 22 chronic carriers. In 9 hepatitis B e antigen-positive asymptomatic carriers, a single DNA band was detected at the expected size, whereas additional shorter DNA bands were observed in 7 out of 11 patients with chronic hepatitis. The smaller-sized DNAs from one chronic hepatitis patient had various lengths of deletions spanning from 105 to 183 bp in the middle of the core gene, and all deletions included common nucleotide sequences. All of the smaller-sized DNAs from the other patients proved to be variant core genes. They were deleted in similar regions by Southern analysis using oligonucleotide probes. A follow-up study revealed that four out of seven chronic hepatitis patients with a short core gene seroconverted to antibody to hepatitis B e antigen, but those with only a "wild type" did not. In another set of sequence studies, clones isolated from two chronic carriers displayed heterogeneity of the pre-C and core gene which was more often present in sera with normal alanine aminotransferase levels than with abnormal levels. These results suggest that mutant HBV alters the host immune response, and may modulate the clinical course of HBV infection. An alternative possibility is that chronic hepatitis selects for mutant forms.     

Case-control study of hepatitis B virus infection in chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma

Summary The prevalence of serum hepatitis B virus markers was studied in three groups of age- and sex-matched patients:a. 31 patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (c-HCC);b. 31 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) andc. 62 hospitalized control subjects. The overall exposure rate to the hepatitis B virus was 90% in c-HCC, 80% in CLD and 58% in control subjects. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was 29%, 13% and 1.6% in the three groups, respectively. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antibody was significantly lower in c-HCC (9.6%) than CLD (42%) and control subjects (40%). The serological evidence of continuous viral replication (HBsAg positivity or isolated high titre hepatitis B core antibody positivity) was more common in c-HCC (39%) than CLD (12%) and control subjects (1.6%). The prevalence and patterns of aggregation of serum hepatitis B virus markers were similar in the 31 patients with c-HCC and in 11 patients with HCC without concomitant liver cirrhosis (n-HCC). In conclusion, the overall exposure rate to the hepatitis B virus is similar in c-HCC and CLD. However, serological evidence of continuous viral replication is more common in the former group. A defective clearance of the hepatitis B virus in hepatocellular carcinoma is a possible explanation of the phenomenon. The strength of the association between hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be similar in c-HCC and n-HCC.     

Liver-specific autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Anti-liver-specific protein (LSP) antibody and liver membrane autoantibody (LMA) have been evaluated in 88 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced chronic liver disease by means of radioimmunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. Among our patients, 38 presented circulating HBe antigen while 43 had HBe antibody and seven were negative for both. Anti-LSP was mainly found in HBeAg positive chronic active hepatitis (CAH), anti-HBe in positive CAH and in anti-HBe positive chronic persistent hepatitis (CPH). Similar prevalences of LMA (range 13-33%) were detected in the various groups studied. Taking into account the histological diagnosis of disease activity (periportal inflammation and piecemeal necrosis) no significant differences were found between active and inactive patients. Taking into account the HBeAg/anti-HBe status, no significant differences were found between the patients positive for 'e' antigen or 'e' antibody. Humoral autoimmune reactions may also play a role in HBV-induced chronic (active) liver disease irrespective of HBeAg/anti-HBe status and hence of the viral replication activity of the patients.     

Radioimmunoassay for detecting hepatitis B core antigen in serum from patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

The core antigen component of hepatitis B virus (HBV), HBcAg, may be used as a marker of viral replication. We describe a radioimmunoassay for HBcAg in serum, and compare results with those by other similar methods. Samples are centrifuged over a sucrose gradient containing 2-mercaptoethanol, and the resulting pellets are resuspended in a nonionic detergent solution. After a bead coated with anti-HBcAg is incubated with this suspension, 125I-labeled anti-HBcAg is added, and is also bound by the antigen. The specificity of the method was verified by blocking with purified IgG antibodies to HBcAg. When we tested by this method for HBcAg in sera from 60 patients with chronic HBV infection, all those with circulating HBV-DNA polymerase tested positive for HBcAg. All sera from HBV-negative controls showed no detectable HBcAg. The correlation between the presence of HBcAg and HBV-DNA polymerase was significant (r = 0.715, p less than 0.001). Samples can be tested more quickly and easily with this method, and its sensitivity compares well with that of other similar methods.     

Role of lamivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence regarding the therapeutic effectiveness of lamivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in immunocompetent patients. DATA SOURCES: Using chronic hepatitis B and lamivudine as MeSH headings, MEDLINE was searched from 1966 to September 1998 for all published randomized controlled trials evaluating lamivudine in chronic HBV infection. Relevant articles from selected bibliographies were also retrieved. STUDY SELECTION: Only randomized, single- and double-blind trials in human HBV carriers published in the English language were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence from the controlled trials suggests that lamivudine has a therapeutic effect in suppressing HBV replication in immunocompetent patients. Lamivudine 100 mg/d appears to suppress HBV replication in as many as 97% of patients within two weeks after the initiation of therapy and is capable of suppressing histologic damages. However, viral suppression is effective only during the therapy; on discontinuation of lamivudine therapy, most patients return to the pretreatment condition. Viral resistance to lamivudine has been observed. Most patients with chronic HBV infection appear to tolerate 100 mg/d of lamivudine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence has shown that oral lamivudine 100 mg/d will produce rapid and significant suppression of viral replication in immunocompetent patients with chronic HBV infections. Treatment periods up to one year have been effective and well tolerated. The suppression of viral replication may not be sustained after cessation of lamivudine therapy, and very few patients have complete elimination of HBV during therapy. Therefore, long treatment periods may be necessary. Efficacy and tolerability of treatment beyond one year need to be investigated. Resistance to lamivudine has been reported in patients receiving therapy. A combination anti-HBV regimen using lamivudine and other agents with different mechanisms of action should be investigated to maximize the elimination of the viral infection while minimizing or preventing damage to the liver cells and tissues and the development of viral resistance.     

Adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera^®, Gilead Sciences) is a prodrug of adefovir, with potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Adefovir dipivoxil therapy, 10 mg daily for 48 weeks, is effective in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B. In hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil was recently found to maintain its efficacy even after 3 years of therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective in patients with compensated or decompensated chronic viral B liver disease, and in pre- and post-transplant hepatitis B virus patients who develop resistance to lamivudine (Epivir^®, GlaxoSmithKline). It is well-tolerated and safe even after the third year of long-term therapy, and is associated with low rates of viral resistance. All these characteristics make adefovir dipivoxil an important drug for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection and an excellent candidate for long-term maintenance therapy in chronic viral B liver disease.     

Telbivudine for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND: Telbivudine (LdT) is an L-nucleoside that is structurally related to lamivudine. It is highly selective for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and inhibits viral DNA synthesis. LdT was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 25, 2006, for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults who have active viral replication and either elevations in liver transaminases or signs of active liver disease on histologic examination. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic efficacy of LdT. Potential drug interactions and adverse events associated with the use of LdT are also reviewed. METHODS: Relevant publications were identified from searches of MEDLINE (1996-June 2007), the Cochrane Library, and BIOSIS (1993-June 2007). Search terms included, but were not limited to, telbivudine, beta-L-thymidine, LdT, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse events, resistance, drug interactions, hepatitis B, and therapeutic use. Additional publications were identified from the reference lists of the identified papers, meeting abstracts, and correspondence with the manufacturer of LdT. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of therapy in the Phase III GLOBE study, HBV resistance (breakthrough and resistance mutations) to LdT occurred in 3% of patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive and 2% of patients who were HBeAg negative. After 104 weeks of therapy, 17.8% to 21.6% of HBeAg-positive and 7.3% to 8.6% of HBeAg-negative LdT-treated patients had a rebound in HBV DNA associated with breakthrough and resistance mutations. After 24 weeks of treatment, the risk of resistance was greater in patients with HBV DNA titers >3 log(10) copies/mL than in those with lower numbers of copies. LdT is not active against lamivudine-resistant HBV. The proportion of HBeAg-positive patients with undetectable HBV DNA (by polymerase chain reaction assay) after 104 weeks of therapy in the GLOBE study was significantly greater with LdT compared with lamivudine (56% vs 39%, respectively; P < 0.05). After 104 weeks of therapy, the corresponding proportions of HBeAg-negative patients with undetectable HBV DNA were 82% and 57% (P < 0.05). Patients who failed lamivudine therapy in the GLOBE study showed cross-resistance to LdT. The most common adverse events associated with LdT are upper respiratory tract infection (14%-17%), fatigue and malaise (12%-14%), nasopharyngitis (11%-15%), headache (11%-12%), and abdominal pain (6%-12%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included elevations in serum creatine kinase, which were more common in patients receiving LdT than in those receiving lamivudine (9% vs 3%, respectively). Elevations in creatine kinase are typically asymptomatic; however, myopathy has been reported in 3 of 680 patients receiving LdT. CONCLUSIONS: LdT joins the increasing number of antiviral agents for the management of chronic HBV infection. Questions concerning the optimal length of therapy and long-term efficacy await the results of on-going clinical trials. Concerns about increasing resistance over time may relegate LdT to second-line status in the management of chronic HBV infection. The role of LdT in combination therapy is under investigation.     

Adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences) is a prodrug of adefovir, with potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Adefovir dipivoxil therapy, 10 mg daily for 48 weeks, is effective in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B. In hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil was recently found to maintain its efficacy even after 3 years of therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective in patients with compensated or decompensated chronic viral B liver disease, and in pre- and post-transplant hepatitis B virus patients who develop resistance to lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline). It is well-tolerated and safe even after the third year of long-term therapy, and is associated with low rates of viral resistance. All these characteristics make adefovir dipivoxil an important drug for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection and an excellent candidate for long-term maintenance therapy in chronic viral B liver disease.     

Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the pharmacology/pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of entecavir, which was approved on March 29, 2005, for the management of adult patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who have active viral replication and/or elevations in liver transaminases or signs of active liver disease on histologic examination. Potential drug interactions and adverse events associated with the use of entecavir are also reviewed. METHODS: Relevant literature was identified through searches of MEDLINE (1996-July 2005) and BIOSIS (1993-July 2005). Search terms included, but were not limited to, entecavir, BMS-200475, hepatitis B, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse events, and therapeutic use. Further publications were identified from the reference lists of the identified articles and through correspondence with the manufacturer of entecavir. RESULTS: Entecavir is highly selective for the HBV and inhibits all 3 steps of viral replication. Results of early studies indicated a 6% resistance potential after 48 weeks of therapy, although the potential may be higher in patients who harbor lamivudine-resistant mutants. The approved dosage in treatment-naive patients is 0.5 mg/d p.o., administered on an empty stomach; in patients who have failed lamivudine therapy or are known to harbor lamivudine-resistant mutants, the approved dosage is 1.0 mg/d p.o.. The oral tablet and solution can be used interchangeably. Entecavir is well absorbed orally, achieving a dose-related Cmax between 0.6 and 1.5 hours after administration. It is metabolized to a small extent and is not a substrate for the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. The mean elimination t(1/2) ranges from 77 to 149 hours in patients with normal kidney function. Entecavir is eliminated primarily in the urine via glomerular filtration and tubular secretion (62%-73%). No dose adjustment appears to be necessary in patients with moderate to severe liver disease alone. The potential for drug interactions with entecavir appears to be minimal, although medications that inhibit tubular secretion of drugs (eg, probenecid) may be expected to prolong serum concentrations of entecavir. One of the Phase III studies of entecavir found statistically significant benefits compared with lamivudine in terms of improvements in liver histology after 48 weeks of therapy (72% vs 62%, respectively; P<0.009), the proportions of patients with undetectable HBV DNA titers on branched DNA signal amplification assay after 48 weeks of therapy (91% vs 65%; P<0.001), and the proportion with undetectable HBV DNA on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay after 48 weeks of therapy (69% vs 38%; P<0.001). In another Phase III study, patients who had failed to respond to lamivudine therapy responded to entecavir: after 48 weeks of therapy, significant differences between entecavir and lamivudine were seen in histologic improvement (55% vs 28%; P<0.001) and the proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA on PCR assay (21% vs 1%; P<0.001). Adverse events associated with entecavir therapy were similar in character, severity, and incidence to those associated with placebo or lamivudine therapy. The most common adverse events in clinical trials of entecavir were headache (17%-23% of patients), upper respiratory tract infection (18%-20%), cough (12%-15%), nasopharyngitis (9%-14%), fatigue (10%-13%), dizziness (9%), upper abdominal pain (9%-10%), and nausea (6%-8%). CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir is a new antiviral agent for the management of chronic HBV infection. Questions concerning the ideal length of therapy, long-term efficacy, and resistance rates over time await the results of ongoing clinical trials.     

Phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis GB virus type C/hepatitis G virus in Spanish patients with chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection.

The nucleotide sequence of hepatitis GB virus type C (HGBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) NS3/helicase and 5'-untranslated regions from 23 Spanish patients were analyzed to assign the HGV isolates one of the proposed HGBV-C/HGV genotypes. The analysis of the evolutionary distance frequency showed that the distances among all sequences in NS3/helicase region were distributed around a single peak of 0.20, suggesting that all included sequences belonged to the same HGBV-C/HGV genotype. By contrast, in the 5'-untranslated region, all the distances corresponding to our sequences and those of the HGBV-C/HGV types 2 and 3 were distributed around a major peak of 0.03. The remaining distances corresponding to the HGBV-C/HGV type 1 sequences were distributed around a minor peak of 0.11. The phylogenetic tree and pairwise comparison of evolutionary distances among the 5'-untranslated region of the infected patients and each HGBV-C/HGV genotype demonstrated that our HGBV-C/HGV isolates belonged to subtype 2a (17/23; 78%) and 2b (5/23; 22%). No relation was found between HGBV-C/HGV subtype and hepatitis B or C virus infection.     

Nucleotide sequence of the precore/core gene and X gene of hepatitis B virus DNA in asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carriers who are negative for serum hepatitis B core antibody

A hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier who is positive for hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen but negative for hepatitis B core (HBc) antibody despite persistent HBV infection, is designated as having hepatitis B virus 2 (HBV2). HBV2 is reported to be induced by mild-grade hepatitis. Patients with HBV2 have been reported in Taiwan and Senegal. In the present study, we determined the nucleotide (nt) sequence of the precore/core gene coding region and X gene region of the HBV DNA sequence in 7 subjects who were positive for HBs antigen and negative for HBc antibody. HBV DNA was detected by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nested PCR was carried out to amplify the precore/core and X open reading frames (ORFs) of HBV DNA. The second PCR products were sequenced, followed by investigation of nt homology. There were no deletions nor insertions in the nt sequence of the precore/core and X ORFs in the HBV DNA of these 7 patients, and mutations were found only sporadically in the 7 patients. Also, there were no common amino acid substitutions in the examined regions of the amino acid sequence of HBV in the 7 patients, and we could not find a common mutation in the examined regions of HBV DNA that could potentially contribute to the development of negativity for HBc antibody. Thus, it is suggested that negativity for HBc antibody in patients with HBV2 is due to an immune response abnormality in the host.     

Markers of disease activity in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND: Assessment of disease activity is important in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Our objective was to study the correlation between serum HBV DNA levels and HBV e antigen (HBeAg) status, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, histologic activity, age and sex in patients who had chronic HBV, with emphasis on those who were HBeAg negative with high replication but had normal or below-normal liver enzyme levels and mild liver disease. METHOD: At our university-affiliated tertiary care medical centre in Turkey, we studied prospectively 179 consecutive patients who were long-term hepatitis B surface antigen carriers. These patients were first separated into 2 groups according to HBeAg positivity and then subdivided into 4 groups according to the presence of HBV DNA, HBeAg status and ALT levels. The clinical, virologic and histologic differences in these patients were evaluated with respect to the HBeAg status. RESULTS: Of the 179 patients, 120 (67%) were HBeAg positive and 59 (33%) were HBeAg negative. The mean (and standard deviation) age in the former group was 24.8 (7.60) and in the latter group was 32.2 (11.2) years (p < 0.001). HBeAg-negative patients had significantly more severe liver disease, more male predominance and lower serum HBV DNA levels than HBeAg-positive patients (p < 0.05). HBeAg status had a close correlation with age. There was a significant correlation between age and serum HBV DNA levels but not between HBV DNA levels and disease activity in study groups. We found that some of anti-HBe-positive patients had below-normal ALT levels with minimal or absent histologic changes despite high viral replication. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of ALT is of value in assessing hepatocellular damage in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. HBeAg-negative patients with elevated ALT levels and some with normal ALT levels should be considered highly infectious in the course of chronic HBV infection.     

Donor screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and hepatitis B virus infection in transfusion recipients

BACKGROUND: Testing for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a surrogate for hepatitis C viremia is no longer needed for blood donor screening. Currently, the important question is how much its use supplements hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) donor screening in preventing transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a study conducted in the 1970s, 64 blood donors were associated with 15 cases of HBV (1.0%) in 1533 transfusion recipients. Sera from 61 donors at donation and 29 follow-up visits were available for present-day assays for HBsAg, HBV DNA, anti-HBc, and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). RESULTS: HBsAg was found in four previously negative blood donors; HBV DNA was limited to three of these four. Anti-HBc was detected in six HBsAg-negative donors. Two other donors were negative in all assays at donation, but positive for anti- HBc and anti-HBs 2 to 4 months later. The remaining donors were negative for all HBV markers, which left five recipient cases unexplained. No HBV transmission was observed when anti-HBs sample-to- negative control values were > or = 10. CONCLUSION: Some 33 to 50 percent of cases of hepatitis B that could be transmitted by transfusion of blood from HBsAg-negative donors are prevented by anti- HBc screening. Anti-HBc-positive donors unequivocally positive for anti- HBs should be considered noninfectious for HBV and should be allowed to donate. Anti-HBc screening of paid plasmapheresis donors, supplemented by anti-HBs testing, would reduce the amount of HBV to be processed by virus inactivation and increase the content of anti-HBs in plasma pools.