Enhanced ethanol-, but not cocaine-induced, conditioned place preference in Apoe(-/-) mice

Apolipoprotein (apo) E is a glycoprotein that is most commonly associated with cardiovascular and Alzheimer's disease risk. Recent data showing that apoE mRNA expression is reduced in the frontal cortex of alcoholics raise the possibility that apoE may also be related to the rewarding properties of ethanol. In this study, we examined whether Apoe deletion affects the rewarding properties of ethanol in mice. Male and female wild-type (WT; C57BL/6J) and apoE knockout (Apoe(-/-); C57BL/6J-Apoe(tm1Unc)) mice underwent an unbiased place conditioning procedure with ethanol (2 g/kg) or cocaine (5 mg/kg). Female mice were also tested for ethanol intake in a two-bottle choice procedure. Apoe(-/-) mice showed greater ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). In contrast, cocaine-induced CPP and ethanol intake were similar between the genotypes. These findings suggest that apoE normally reduces the conditioned rewarding properties of ethanol but not of cocaine. While the exact mechanisms underlying these effects of apoE are unknown, these data support a possible role for apoE in modulating the conditioned rewarding properties of ethanol.     

Histamine and H3 receptor-dependent mechanisms regulate ethanol stimulation and conditioned place preference in mice

Rationale

Neuronal histamine has a prominent role in sleep–wake control and body homeostasis, but a number of studies suggest that histamine has also a role in higher brain functions including drug reward.

Objective

The present experiments characterized the involvement of histamine and its H3 receptor in ethanol-related behaviors in mice.

Materials and methods

Male histidine decarboxylase knockout (HDC KO) and control mice were used to study the role of histamine in ethanol-induced stimulation of locomotor activity, impairment of motor coordination, and conditioned place preference (CPP). Male C57BL/6Sca mice were used to study the effects of H3 receptor antagonist in the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity.

Results

The HDC KO mice displayed a weaker stimulatory response to acute ethanol than the wild-type (WT) mice. No differences between genotypes were found after ethanol administration on accelerating rotarod. The HDC KO mice showed stronger ethanol-induced CPP than the WT mice. Binding of the GABA_A receptor ligand [³H]Ro15-4513 was not markedly changed in HDC KO mouse brain and thus could not explain altered responses in KO mice. Ethanol increased the activity of C57BL/6Sca mice, and H3 receptor antagonist ciproxifan inhibited this stimulation. In CPP paradigm ciproxifan, an H3 receptor inverse agonist potentiated ethanol reward.

Conclusions

Histaminergic neurotransmission seems to be necessary for the stimulatory effect of ethanol to occur, whereas lack of histamine leads to changes that enhance the conditioned reward by ethanol. Our findings also suggest a role for histamine H3 receptor in modulation of the ethanol stimulation and reward.     

Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol

The influence of genotype on the rewarding and locomotor activating effects of morphine and ethanol was examined in the place conditioning paradigm. Two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) were exposed to a differential conditioning procedure in which each mouse received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus with IP injection of morphine (0, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or ethanol (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 g/kg). A different floor stimulus was paired with saline. Conditioning trials lasted 30 min and each experiment concluded with a floor preference test in the absence of drug. In accord with previous studies, morphine evoked a dose-dependent increase in activity during conditioning that was greater in C57BL/6J mice than in DBA/2J mice. In contrast, ethanol produced a dose-dependent increase in activity that was greater in DBA/2J than in C57BL/6J mice. Both strains showed conditioned place preference with morphine, but only the DBA/2J strain showed conditioned place preference with ethanol. No conditioned place aversion was seen. With both drugs, stronger place preference conditioning was obtained in DBA/2J mice, supporting the general conclusion that sensitivity to drug reward is influenced by genotype. The fact that the same genotype is more sensitive to the rewarding effects of two different drugs supports theories postulating commonality in the biological mechanisms of drug reward. Although the outcome of the ethanol study supports predictions of the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction concerning the relationship between drug-induced activation and reward, the outcome of the morphine study does not. The direction of the strain difference in conditioned place preference is opposite to what might be predicted on the basis of strain differences previously reported in drug consumption and preference studies, suggesting that genetic differences in drug consumption may not accurately reflect postabsorptive motivational effects of drug.     

Morphine conditioned reward is inhibited by MPEP,the mGluR5 antagonist

In the present study we examined the effect of MPEP [2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine] a potent, selective and systemically active metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) type I (subtype mGluR5) antagonist on conditioned morphine reward in mice. In an unbiased version of conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm, single conditioning with 10 mg/kg of morphine produced reliable place preference. MPEP at 30, but not 10 mg/kg significantly inhibited the acquisition as well as expression of morphine-induced CPP, but it neither produced place preference or aversion, nor affected locomotor activity of mice. Effects of MPEP on learning and memory were studied in the elevated plus maze model of spatial learning. In contrast to 0.1 mg/kg of MK-801, which inhibited the acquisition of this task, 30 mg/kg of MPEP affected neither learning nor memory retrieval. These data suggest that mGluR5 may be involved in conditioned morphine reward.     

GABAA receptors modulate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and taste aversion in mice

  Rationale: GABA_A receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce ethanol self-administration and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in rats, suggesting a role for the GABA_A receptor in modulating ethanol’s motivational effects. Objectives: The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA_A receptor antagonists, bicuculline and picrotoxin, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and CTA in male DBA/2J mice. Methods: Mice in the CPP experiments received four pairings of ethanol (2 g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). During CS+ sessions, mice also received bicuculline (0, 1.0, 3.0, or 5.0 mg/kg) or picrotoxin (2.0 mg/kg) before an injection of ethanol. On intervening days (CS– sessions), the pretreatment injection was always vehicle followed by saline injections that were paired with a different floor type. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections and were placed on a half grid and half hole floor for a 60-min session. For the CTA experiments, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of vehicle, bicuculline (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg), or picrotoxin (0.75 and 2.5 mg/kg) before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Results: Both picrotoxin and the lowest dose of bicuculline (1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the magnitude of CPP relative to vehicle-treated controls. Picrotoxin alone did not produce place conditioning. Ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity was significantly reduced during conditioning trials with picrotoxin and the higher doses of bicuculline (3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg). Bicuculline did not alter ethanol-induced CTA; however, picrotoxin dose-dependently increased the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA. Bicuculline and picrotoxin did not produce CTA when administered alone. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that blockade of GABA_A receptors with bicuculline and picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CPP paradigm; however, only picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CTA paradigm. Received: 12 September 1998 / Final version: 21 December 1998     

Injection timing determines whether intragastric ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice

Previous studies have shown that mice develop conditioned place preference (CPP) when ethanol is administered by intraperitoneal (ip) or intravenous (iv) injection. The present studies examined CPP in mice using the intragastric (ig) route of administration. Inbred mice were surgically implanted with chronic intragastric cannulae and exposed to an unbiased place conditioning procedure in which infusion of ethanol (2 or 4 g/kg) was paired with a conditioned stimulus (CS+). A different CS was paired with water. In Experiments 1-2, ethanol was infused just before exposure to CS+. Contrary to previous studies involving intraperitoneal injection, infusion of 4 g/kg ig ethanol produced a significant conditioned place aversion (CPA). However, when a 5-min delay was inserted between infusion and CS exposure (Experiments 3-4), the same dose produced CPP. These outcomes are not consistent with expectations derived from a recent study in selectively bred rats, suggesting that sensitivity to ethanol reward is enhanced by intragastric administration. However, the finding that intragastric ethanol can produce either CPP or CPA depending on dose and injection timing is consistent with previous intraperitoneal ethanol studies in mice. Although the parameters differ for each route of administration, it appears that the same underlying processes can be invoked to explain how manipulation of injection timing affects the direction of ethanol-induced place conditioning. More specifically, in both cases, CPA can be attributed to an initial, short-lived aversive effect, whereas CPP can be attributed to a delayed rewarding effect of ethanol.     

Involvement of the sigma 1 receptor in the motivational effects of ethanol in mice

In the present study, we examined the involvement of the sigma(1) (sigma(1)) receptor in several behavioral manifestations of ethanol addiction. Administration of ethanol (0.5, 1, and 2 g/kg) in Swiss mice dose-dependently induced locomotor stimulation, conditioned place preference, and conditioned taste aversion, which are considered as behavioral index of drug-induced reward. Pretreatment with the selective sigma(1) receptor antagonist N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(dimethylamino)ethylamine (BD1047, 3-30 mg/kg) dose-dependently blocked ethanol (1 g/kg)-induced hyperlocomotion and taste aversion and ethanol (2 g/kg)-induced place preference. Pretreatment with the selective sigma(1) receptor agonist 2-(4-morpholino)ethyl 1-phenylcyclohexane-1-carboxylate (PRE-084, 1-10 mg/kg) before ethanol (0.5 g/kg) failed to affect the resulting locomotor stimulation, but dose-dependently enhanced the conditioned place preference. Each sigma(1) receptor ligand was devoid of behavioral effect by itself. These observations show that activation of the sigma(1) receptor is a necessary component of ethanol-induced motivational effects and suggest a new pharmacological target for alleviating ethanol addiction.     

Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice

Rationale Reduced expression of a drug-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) may reflect a decrease in the drug’s conditioned rewarding effects. However, CPP is also open to disruption by processes unrelated to the underlying motivation. In unpublished studies, we previously observed that ethanol pretreatment before testing disrupted expression of ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. We hypothesized that this interference effect was due to large ethanol-induced increases in activity. Objective The present studies were designed to examine the relationship between test activity and expression of ethanol-induced CPP both in the presence and absence of ethanol. To assess the generality of this relationship, we examined these effects both in DBA/2J (which are highly activated by ethanol) and in NZB/B1NJ mice (which show similar CPP, but less ethanol-induced activation). Materials and methods In separate experiments, inbred mice from each strain underwent ethanol (2 g/kg) place conditioning. Saline or ethanol was then administered immediately before the test. Results Ethanol, given immediately before the test, blocked the expression of ethanol CPP in DBA/2J, but not in NZB/B1NJ mice. Moreover, ethanol significantly increased test activity levels in DBA/2J and to a much lesser degree in NZB/B1NJ mice. Correlation analyses showed an inverse phenotypic relationship between preference and test activity, reflecting stronger preferences in less active mice. Conclusions Disruption of ethanol-CPP observed in DBA/2J mice may be a consequence of high ethanol-induced activity levels. More generally, these studies suggest that competing behaviors can affect expression of a drug-induced CPP independent of affecting the conditioned rewarding effects of the drug.     

Dopamine D3 receptor knockout mice and the motivational effects of ethanol

Dopamine D3 receptors have been implicated in the behavioral effects of abused drugs including ethanol. The present experiments characterized the acquisition of ethanol-induced place conditioning and ethanol self-administration in D3 knockout (D3 KO) mice compared with C57BL/6J (C57) mice. For place conditioning, D3 KO and C57 mice received six pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (3 g/kg i.p.). D3 KO mice showed higher basal locomotor activity levels in comparison with the C57 mice during conditioning. Ethanol produced similar magnitudes of conditioned place preference in both genotypes. In a two-bottle drinking procedure, mice of each genotype received 24 h access to water and either 3% or 10% v/v ethanol. No difference was noted between D3 KO and C57 mice in either consumption or preference. In an operant self-administration procedure using 23 h sessions, D3 KO and C57 mice received access to 10% v/v ethanol on an FR4 schedule of reinforcement, food on an FR1 schedule of reinforcement and water from a sipper tube. D3 KO and C57 mice had similar response rates of ethanol and food as well as similar water intakes. Overall, these results indicate that elimination of D3 receptor function has little influence on ethanol reward or intake.     

Effects of E-2078, a stable dynorphin A(1–8) analog, on sedation and serum prolactin levels in rhesus monkeys

Rationale: In previous comparisons with C57BL/6J mice, DBA/2J mice have been characterized as ”hyporesponsive” to cocaine’s rewarding effect in the conditioned place-preference paradigm. This finding contrasts with other studies showing greater sensitivity of DBA/2J mice to the rewarding effects of ethanol and morphine in the place conditioning task. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to examine cocaine- induced place conditioning in both strains using apparatus and procedures similar to those used previously to assess ethanol and morphine preference conditioning. Methods: Mice from both strains were exposed to an unbiased place-conditioning procedure using 1, 10, or 30 mg/kg cocaine. Conditioning trial duration was 15, 30, or 60 min. Results: In general, C57BL/6J mice displayed a significant conditioned place preference that was relatively unaffected by cocaine dose or trial duration. In contrast, DBA/2J mice showed no place conditioning at the shortest trial duration, but an increasing level of preference as trial duration increased. At the longest trial duration, both strains showed similar levels of place preference. Conclusions: Genetic differences in sensitivity to cocaine’s rewarding effect depend critically on temporal parameters of the place-conditioning procedure. One possible interpretation of these findings is that short trial durations produce conditioned activity responses that interfere more with expression of conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice than in C57BL/6J mice. More generally, these findings underscore the need for caution when drawing conclusions about genetic differences in place conditioning, especially when using this paradigm to evaluate the effects of gene knockouts or insertions on drug reward. Received: 31 December 1998 / Final version: 15 April 1999     

Different roles of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors in ethanol-associated place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress

The present study was designed to investigate the role of the endogenous opioid system in the development of ethanol-induced place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress (exposure to an environment paired previously with electric foot shock), using the conditioned place preference paradigm. The administration of ethanol (300 mg/kg, i.p.) with conditioned fear stress induced significant place preference. Naloxone (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.), a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated this ethanol-induced place preference. Moreover, the selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (3 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and the selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly attenuated ethanol-induced place preference. In contrast, the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced ethanol-induced place preference. Furthermore, 75 mg/kg ethanol (which tended to produce place preference) combined with the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) or the selective delta-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4aalpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12aalpha- octahydroquinolino [2,3,3,-g] isoquinoline (TAN-67; 20 mg/kg, s.c.), at doses which alone did not produce place preference, produced significant place preference. However, co-administration of the selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist trans-3,4-dichloro-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl)benzenacetamide methanesulfonate (U50,488H; 0.3 and 1 mg/kg, s.c.) with ethanol (300 mg/kg, i.p.) dose dependently attenuated ethanol-induced place preference. Moreover, conditioned fear stress shifted the response curve for the aversive effect of U50,488H to the left. These results suggest that mu- and delta-opioid receptors may play critical roles in the rewarding mechanism of ethanol, and that kappa-opioid receptors may modulate the development of the rewarding effect of ethanol under psychological stress.     

Baclofen alters ethanol-stimulated activity but not conditioned place preference or taste aversion in mice.

The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in male DBA/2J mice. Mice in the CPP experiment received four pairings of ethanol (2g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). On intervening days (CS- sessions), mice received saline injections paired with a different floor type. On CS+ days, mice also received one of four doses of baclofen (0.0. 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/kg) 15 min before an injection of ethanol. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections, and were placed on a half-grid and half-hole floor for a 60-min session. Baclofen dose dependently reduced ethanol-stimulated activity, but did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CPP at any dose. For the CTA experiment, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of saline or baclofen (2.0 and 6.0 mg/kg) 15 min before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Baclofen did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA at any dose. In addition, baclofen alone did not produce a CTA. Overall, these studies show that activation of GABA(B) receptors with baclofen reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activation, but does not alter ethanol's rewarding or aversive effects in the CPP and CTA paradigms in DBA/2J mice.     

Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Rationale

Studies support differential roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the rewarding and reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, the roles these receptor subfamilies play in ethanol reward are not fully delineated.

Objective

To examine the roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), we pretreated animals systemically with antagonist drugs selective for dopamine D1-like (SCH-23390) and D2-like (raclopride) receptors prior to ethanol conditioning trials.

Methods

Effects of raclopride (0–1.2 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (0–0.3 mg/kg) on the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP were examined in DBA/2J mice (experiments 1 and 2). Based on significant effects of SCH-23390, we then determined if SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) produced a place preference on its own (experiment 3). To evaluate whether SCH-23390 impaired learning, we used a conditioned place aversion (CPA) paradigm and pretreated animals with SCH-23390 (0–0.3 mg/kg) before conditioning sessions with LiCl (experiment 4).

Results

Whereas raclopride (0–1.2 mg/kg) did not affect acquisition, SCH-23390 (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) impaired the development of ethanol-induced CPP. SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) did not produce place preference when tested alone and SCH-23390 (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) did not perturb the acquisition of LiCl-induced CPA.

Conclusions

Our results support a role for dopamine D1-like but not D2-like receptors in ethanol’s unconditioned rewarding effect as indexed by CPP. Blockade of D1-like receptors did not affect aversive learning in this procedure.     

CB1 receptor knockout mice display reduced ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and increased striatal dopamine D2 receptors.

Cannabinoids and ethanol activate the same reward pathways, and recent advances in the understanding of the neurobiological basis of alcoholism suggest that the CB1 receptor system may play a key role in the reinforcing effects of ethanol and in modulating ethanol intake. In the present study, male CB1 receptors knockout mice generated on a CD1 background displayed decreased ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) compared to wild-type (CB1(+/+)) mice. Ethanol (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/kg) induced significant CPP in CB1(+/+) mice at all doses tested, whereas it induced significant CPP only at the highest dose of ethanol (2.0 g/kg) in CB1(-/-) mice. However, there was no genotypic difference in cocaine (20 mg/kg)-induced CPP. There was also no genotypic difference, neither in cocaine (10-50 mg/kg) nor in D-amphetamine (1.2-5 mg/kg)-induced locomotor effects. In addition, mutant and wild-type mice did not differ in sensitivity to the anxiolytic effects of ethanol (1.5 g/kg) when tested using the elevated plus maze. Interestingly, this decrease in ethanol efficacy to induce CPP in CB1(-/-) mice was correlated with an increase in D2/D3 receptors, as determined by [3H]raclopride binding, whereas there was no difference in D1-like receptors, as determined by [3H]SCH23390 binding, measured in the striatum from drug-naive mice. This increase in D2/D3 binding sites observed in CB1 knockout mice was associated with an altered locomotor response to the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (low doses 0.02-0.1 mg/kg) but not to an alteration of quinpirole (0.1-1.0 mg/kg)-induced CPP compared to wild-type mice. Altogether, the present results indicate that lifelong deletion of CB1 receptors reduced ethanol-induced CPP and that these reduced rewarding effects of ethanol are correlated to an overexpression of striatal dopamine D2 receptors.     

The selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 allosteric agonist AMN082 prevents reinstatement of extinguished ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Alcohol dependence is considered a major public health problem in modern societies. The role for glutamatergic neurotransmission in the reinforcing effects of ethanol is becoming increasingly evident. Our previous findings have shown that in rats, the mGluR7 positive allosteric agonist AMN082, but not its allosteric antagonist MMPIP, prevented ethanol consumption and preference in the two-bottle choice paradigm. This study was conducted to determine the effects of AMN082 and MMPIP on the extinction and reinstatement of ethanol-elicited place preference (CPP) in C57BL/6 mice. AMN082 and MMPIP were administered during extinction of ethanol CPP to determine whether mGluR7 signaling is required. Furthermore, the effects of AMN082 and MMPIP on reinstatement of CPP were also evaluated. Finally, spontaneous locomotor activity and ethanol pharmacokinetics were assessed following systemic administration of AMN082 and MMPIP. Our results indicate that mGluR7 pharmacological modulation had no effect on ethanol-elicited CPP extinction. In contrast, mGluR7 activation using AMN082 reduced ethanol-induced CPP reinstatement, an effect reversed by co-administration of MMPIP. Collectively, these results indicate, for the first time, that activation of the mGluR7 receptor is effective in reducing the reinstatement of conditioned rewarding effects of ethanol. Taken together, the efficacy of AMN082 on the various phases of alcohol-CPP could represent an interesting pharmacological approach and could open a new line of research for the development of therapies to reduce ethanol intake in patients.     

Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1–12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2–8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8–2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.     

Genetic differences in naloxone enhancement of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

The influence of the opioid system on acquisition of an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion was examined in alcohol-preferring and avoiding inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J). Fluid-deprived mice from each strain received either ethanol alone, naloxone alone, or both ethanol and naloxone immediately after access to a novel tasting fluid. Naloxone alone (1 or 3 mg/kg) did not induce a conditioned taste aversion in either strain of mice. Administration of ethanol (1.5 g/kg) to DBA/2J mice produced a moderate taste aversion that was not affected by co-administration of naloxone. Although ethanol administered alone (3 g/kg) did not cause a taste aversion in C57BL/6J mice, the combination of ethanol and the higher dose of naloxone produced a significant taste aversion that increased across trials. A second experiment addressed the possibility that naloxone failed to enhance the ethanol-induced condition taste aversion in DBA/2J mice due to a floor effect on consumption. A lower ethanol dose (1 g/kg) was given alone or in combination with naloxone (1 or 3 mg/kg). Again, ethanol produced a moderate conditioned taste aversion that was not potentiated by naloxone. Subsequent conditioning with a high ethanol dose produced further suppression of intake, confirming that naloxone's failure to enhance aversion on earlier trials was not due to a floor effect. These data demonstrate a strain specific interaction between the aversive effect of ethanol and naloxone. More specifically, the results indicate that blockade of opioid receptors enhances the aversive effect of ethanol in C57BL/6J but not DBA/2J mice, suggesting that genetically determined differences in the endogenous opioid system of alcohol-preferring mice may mitigate ethanol's aversive effect.     

Forebrain PENK and PDYN gene expression levels in three inbred strains of mice and their relationship to genotype-dependent morphine reward sensitivity

Rationale

Vulnerability to drug abuse disorders is determined not only by environmental but also by genetic factors. A body of evidence suggests that endogenous opioid peptide systems may influence rewarding effects of addictive substances, and thus, their individual expression levels may contribute to drug abuse liability.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to assess whether basal genotype-dependent brain expression of opioid propeptides genes can influence sensitivity to morphine reward.

Methods

Experiments were performed on inbred mouse strains C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, and SWR/J, which differ markedly in responses to morphine administration: DBA/2J and SWR/J show low and C57BL/6J high sensitivity to opioid reward. Proenkephalin (PENK) and prodynorphin (PDYN) gene expression was measured by in situ hybridization in brain regions implicated in addiction. The influence of the κ opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), which attenuates effects of endogenous PDYN-derived peptides, on rewarding actions of morphine was studied using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm.

Results

DBA/2J and SWR/J mice showed higher levels of PDYN and lower levels of PENK messenger RNA in the nucleus accumbens than the C57BL/6J strain. Pretreatment with nor-BNI enhanced morphine-induced CPP in the opioid-insensitive DBA/2J and SWR/J strains.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that inter-strain differences in PENK and PDYN genes expression in the nucleus accumbens parallel sensitivity of the selected mouse strains to rewarding effects of morphine. They suggest that high expression of PDYN may protect against drug abuse by limiting drug-produced reward, which may be due to dynorphin-mediated modulation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens.     

Different time schedules affect conditioned place preference after morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide administration

A number of studies have investigated the reward potential of morphine, using the Conditioned Place Preference (CPP) procedure. The morphine-metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is known to have analgesic activity comparable to morphine, but its reward properties are unclear. An unbiased two compartment counterbalanced procedure was used to investigate the induction of CPP by morphine or M6G in C57BL/6J-Bom mice using different conditioning schedules. The conditioning sessions took place either immediately after the injections and lasted either 20 or 40 min, or were delayed until 15 min after the injections and lasted for 20 min. Locomotor activity was recorded during the conditioning sessions. Morphine induced CPP when the 20-minute conditioning sessions were conducted directly after the injections, but not when they were delayed. M6G induced CPP when the 20-minute conditioning sessions were delayed, but not when the animals were conditioned directly after the injections. Neither morphine nor M6G induced CPP after 40-minute direct conditioning sessions. M6G had a biphasic effect on locomotor activity, with an initial decrease followed by excitation. This study indicates that M6G has rewarding effects, and might contribute to the development of addiction after heroin or morphine administration. However, in any attempts to explore the reward properties of M6G, the choice of time schedule should be carefully considered.     

The role of alpha-adrenoceptor mechanism(s) in morphine-induced conditioned place preference in female mice

It has been shown that the alpha-adrenergic system is involved in some effects of opioids, including analgesia and reward. Gender differences also exist between males and females in response to alpha-adrenergic agents. This study was designed to determine the effects of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on the acquisition or expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in female mice. The experiments showed that subcutaneous injections of morphine (0.5-8 mg/kg) induced CPP in a dose-dependent manner in mice. Intrapritoneal administration of the alpha-1-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), and alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine (0.0001, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/kg), as well as alpha-1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) or alpha-2 adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine (0.005, 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg) did not induce motivational effects and also did not alter locomotor activity in the animals. In the second set of experiments, the drugs were used before testing on Day 5, to test their effects on the expression of morphine-induced CPP. Intrapritoneal administration of phenylephrine and clonidine decreased the expression of morphine-induced CPP. In contrast, after application of prazosin or yohimbine, the expression of morphine-induced CPP was increased. Administration of lower (0.03 mg/kg) and higher doses of phenylephrine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) during acquisition of morphine CPP decreased and increased the morphine CPP, respectively. Similarly, the administration of prazosin and clonidine decreased while yohimbine increased the morphine CPP. It may be concluded that alpha-adrenoceptor mechanism(s) influence morphine-induced CPP in female mice.