Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Ankylosing Spondylitis

We compared the results of the metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with the ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 2 groups. The preoperative and postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) were recorded. At the latest follow-up, both of the groups make satisfactory clinical and radiographic results. There was no significant difference in Harris hip score of the 2 groups, but the ROM of the hips in hip resurfacing group was significantly wider than THA group (P < .01). Hip resurfacing has better ROM improvement than THA, with the same pain relief. Its high stability and low dislocation rate allow patients to do early function exercises, which is important for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients to avoid reankylosis. Hip resurfacing may be a reasonable option for young AS population.     

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Acetabulum and Proximal Femur After Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Our aim was to investigate the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A comparative study was carried out on 51 hips in 48 patients. Group A consisted of 25 patients (26 hips) who had undergone total hip resurfacing and group B consisted of 23 patients (25 hips) who had had large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). BMDs around the acetabulum and proximal femur were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter during the 3 years after surgery. At final follow-up, the acetabular net mean BMD decreased by 11% in group A and 10% in group B with no differences between two groups (P = .35). For the femoral side, in Gruen zone 1, the mean BMD increased by 4% in group A, whereas it decreased by 11% in group B (P = .029). In Gruen zone 7, the mean BMD increased by 8% at the final follow-up in group A, whereas it decreased by 13% in group B (P = .02). In both groups the mean BMD increased by 3% in Gruen zones 3, 4, 5, and 6. Stress-related bone loss of the acetabulum was comparable for MOM THA and resurfacing devices, but proximal femoral bone density increased in the resurfacing group and decreased in the THA group.     

Stair Ascending and Descending in Hip Resurfacing and Large Head Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Large head total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are alternatives to standard THA that generally have head sizes larger than 36 mm. This study examined 20 patients (10 large head THA and 10 HRA), at an average of 18 months postoperatively, and 15 healthy control subjects during stair negotiation. Hip kinetic and kinematic variables and ground reaction forces were measured. The THA and HRA groups ascended the stairs with increased peak hip flexion angles and decreased hip extension angles as compared with controls. The operative groups also descended the stairs with decreased hip flexion moments. No differences between the operative groups were observed. Eighteen months postoperatively, patients with large head THA or HRA display abnormal flexion and extension during a physically-demanding task.     

An Initial Experience with Hip Resurfacing Versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty.

Questions/Purpose

We aimed to compare an experienced hip surgeon’s initial clinical results of hip resurfacing with a new cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

The first 55 consecutive hip resurfacing arthroplasties were compared to 100 consecutive cementless THAs using a cylindrical tapered femoral stem. The learning curve between the two procedures was compared utilizing the incidence of reoperation, complications, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and implant survivorship.

Results

The reoperation rate was significantly higher (p = 0.019) for hip resurfacing (14.5%) versus THA (4%). The overall complication rate between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.398). Preoperative HHS were similar between the two groups (p = 0.2). The final mean HHS was similar in both the resurfacing and THA groups (96 vs. 98.3, respectively, p < 0.65). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with an endpoint of reoperation suggests complications occurred earlier in the resurfacing group versus the THA group (log-rank test, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

In comparison to our initial experience with a cementless THA stem, operative complications occur earlier and more often after hip resurfacing during the learning period. The clinical outcomes in both groups however are similar at 5 year follow-up.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9333-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

髋关节骨性关节炎及髋臼发育不良对髋关节表面置换术中髋臼安装角度的影响

[目的]研究全髋关节表面置换术中,单纯骨性关节炎及髋关节发育不良对髋臼安装角度的影响及两组病例疗效比较。[方法]自2006～2009年,本科共实施全髋表面关节置换术20例23髋,病因包括单纯骨性关节炎10髋及髋关节发育不良13髋。手术假体均采用金属对金属大直径表面置换假体,股骨侧骨水泥固定,髋臼侧生物型固定。[结果]所有患者均获得近期随访(6个月～3年),随访包括临床评估和放射学评估。两组患者术前术后Harris评分均无明显统计学差异。无一发生术后脱位、股骨颈骨折等并发症。其中单纯骨性关节炎患者术后臼杯外展角25.6°～56.0°(平均43.9°±9.9°),平均髋臼覆盖率达95.8%。髋臼发育不良患者术后臼杯外展角22.4°～69.3°(平均46.8°±12.9°),髋臼覆盖率达84.3%。[结论]金属对金属大直径表面置换假体在治疗单纯骨性关节炎及髋关节发育不良早期临床疗效并无明显统计学差异。但是髋关节发育不良患者行髋关节表面置换术中,髋臼假体外展角离散度要明显高于单纯骨性关节炎组,其髋臼杯假体外展角度控制要难于单纯骨性关节炎。     

Comparison of Bone Removed During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Resurfacing or Conventional Femoral Component : A Cadaveric Study

We sought to examine the amount of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing femoral component, compared to with a conventional, stemmed femoral component, by using 6 male and 4 female cadaveric pelves with attached bilateral proximal femora. Using randomized assignment and order, a total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing femoral implant was performed on one side, and total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, stemmed femoral implant was performed on the contralateral side. The relationship between native femoral head diameter and the implanted acetabular socket was on average within 2 mm for both procedures. No significant difference was observed in the amount of acetabular bone removed (9.8 g for hip resurfacing vs 8.8 g). However, a resurfacing component resulted in approximated 3 × less bone removal from the femur (25.8 g vs 75.1 g). This study shows that the preservation of femoral bone with a resurfacing femoral component does not result in an increased removal of acetabular bone when compared to the use of a conventional, stemmed femoral component.     

Conversion of Hip Arthrodesis to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Clinical Outcome

This study evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing conversion of a hip arthrodesis to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and compared them to 2 patient cohorts: primary THA and first-time revision THA. Patients completed 5 standardized outcome questionnaires. The study cohort was compared to matched groups of primary THA and first-time revision THA patients. Twenty-six patients were identified, 2 deceased and 7 revised, leaving 17 patients available for review. A 10-year survivorship of 74.2% and complication rate of 54% were noted. All outcome scores were lower for the study cohort: clinically significant difference vs revision THA group and statistically significant difference vs primary THA group. Takedown arthrodesis patients experience poor clinical outcomes and high complication rates compared to primary and even revision THA.     

Early Return to Function After Hip Resurfacing : Is It Better Than Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Our hypothesis was that return of function for young patients undergoing resurfacing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal-on-metal bearings or contemporary THA with ceramic bearings would be comparable. Results from 337 unilateral hip resurfacing patients were compared with results from 266 unilateral ceramic-on-ceramic THA patients. Early differences in Harris Hip Scores were observed, but all differences faded by 24 months. Hip resurfacing seems to be a viable alternative to THA for well-selected patients. However, the public perception of improved functional capabilities was not demonstrated in this patient population. Resurfacing patients may be more impaired (slightly higher pain scores/lower function scores) than their THA counterparts in the early postoperative period, but these differences disappear by 24 months when both groups report Harris Hip Scores in the excellent range.     

Metal Ion Levels in Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hip Resurfacing

Recent studies suggest that the tapered interface between stem and femoral head may be a substantial source of cobalt and chromium ion release after metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study compared patient ion levels after MOM hip resurfacing (HR) and MOM THA performed with identical acetabular components. 110 HRs were compared with 22 THAs. All had well-oriented components, unilateral implants, and serum ion studies beyond one year post-operatively. The HR group’s median cobalt value was 1.11 μg/L vs. 2.86 μg/L for the THA patients. The HR group’s median chromium value was 1.49 μg/L vs. 2.94 μg/L for THA. Significantly higher THA ion levels suggest a source of ions other than the MOM bearing itself.     

Higher Prevalence of Mixed or Solid Pseudotumors in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Pseudotumors are a common finding in metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA). However, information on pseudotumors in metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA is limited.

金属对金属全髋关节表面置换治疗中青年中晚期股骨头缺血性坏死

目的评价金属对金属全髋关节表面置换治疗中青年中晚期股骨头缺血性坏死(osteonecrosis of the femoral head,ONFH)的早期疗效,并与同期治疗单纯骨性关节炎疗效比较。方法回顾分析2006年7月-2008年10月行金属对金属全髋关节表面置换的33例45髋ONFH患者(ONFH组)临床资料,并与同期行金属对金属全髋关节表面置换的39例45髋骨性关节炎患者(骨性关节炎组)进行疗效比较。ONFH组:男18例27髋,女15例18髋;年龄19～58岁,平均42.7岁。有创伤史4例,糖皮质激素治疗史25例,吸毒史2例,酗酒史1例,银屑病1例。左侧22髋,右侧23髋。按Steinberg分期:Ⅲ期10髋,Ⅳa期18髋,Ⅳb期13髋,Ⅳc期4髋。Harris评分为(52.0±4.6)分。病程为1～12年。骨性关节炎组:男26例30髋,女13例15髋;年龄42～65岁,平均47.1岁。左侧17髋,右侧28髋。退行性骨性关节炎23例,创伤后骨性关节炎11例,强直性脊柱炎继发骨性关节炎5例。Harris评分为(57.0±3.8)分。病程为3～17年。两组患者一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。结果术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无感染、下肢深静脉血栓等并发症发生。患者均获随访,ONFH组随访时间平均26个月,骨性关节炎组平均28个月。术后4个月骨性关节炎组1例发生股骨颈骨折,改行人工全髋关节置换。其余患者均无明显假体松动、脱位,切口感染,骨坏死、吸收等并发症发生。末次随访时ONFH组Harris评分为(93.0±5.5)分,骨性关节炎组为(94.0±2.4)分;两组术后组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);组内手术前后比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论金属对金属全髋关节表面置换治疗中青年中晚期ONFH近期临床效果满意,与治疗骨性关节炎效果相似,但仍需积累更多病例及长期临床随访验证中远期疗效。     

Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty

Patients with standard total hip arthroplasties may have reduced hip abduction and extension moments when compared with normal nonosteoarthritic hips. In comparison, patients after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty appear to have a near-normal gait. The authors evaluated temporal-spatial parameters, hip kinematics, and kinetics in hip resurfacing patients compared with patients with unilateral osteoarthritic hips and unilateral standard total hip arthroplasties. Patients with resurfacing walked faster (average 1.26 m/s) and were comparable with normals. There were no significant differences in hip abductor and extensor moments of patients with resurfacing compared with patients in the standard hip arthroplasty group. This study showed more normal hip kinematics and functionality in resurfacing hip arthroplasty, which may be due to the large femoral head.     

Computerized Range of Motion Analysis Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty,Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty,and Hip Resurfacing

Newer arthroplasty designs claim to provide superior range of motion (ROM) and greater stability than their predecessors. However, there is no way to compare ROM of implant systems in an equivalent anatomical environment in a clinical setting. This study used computer-aided design to compare ROM after hip resurfacing, 28 mm THA, 36 mm THA, and anatomic dual mobility (ADM) THA in 3D models of 5 cadaver pelvises. ROM to impingement was then tested in 10 different motions and a one-way ANOVA was used to compare results. The hip resurfacing resulted in restricted ROM compared to the other 3 models in all motions except adduction. The ADM, 36 mm, and 28 mm THA resulted in similar ROM. Dual mobility constructs provide comparable ROM in patients where large head THA is not appropriate.     

Hip resurfacing: For the right patient and surgeon

Hip resurfacing offers several advantages over traditional total hip replacement, such as femoral bone preservation, larger head size, higher activity level, and easier revision options. Now, that hip resurfacing has reached a mature state in its practice, there are substantial data that identifies patients who are most likely to benefit from these advantages. There are, however, risks that are inherent to the metal-on-metal articulation of a hip resurfacing implant. For example, there is a danger of edge loading with the hard-on-hard bearing, leading to excess production of wear debris (metallosis). Furthermore, there is the possibility of an immunologic reaction to the metal wear particles, leading to swelling, osteolysis, and potential tissue destruction. Several studies and national registries have found that male patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, good bone quality, large bone size, and normal anatomy are the cohort who has the highest success rate with hip resurfacing. These patients will also likely achieve a higher activity level, making it worthwhile for them to accept the potential risks of a metal-on-metal implant. Hip resurfacing is also generally accepted to be a more technically difficult procedure than traditional hip replacement due to the need to expose the acetabulum while retaining the native femoral head and neck. Therefore, surgeons need special training to be facile with the procedure and sufficient surgical volume to advance beyond the learning curve. The metal-on-metal bearing is less forgiving than other materials and thus the placement of the implant needs to be more precise. Thus, hip resurfacing will have the greatest chance of success in the right patient and when performed by the right surgeon.     

Results With the Cementless Spotorno Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Increasingly young and active patients are undergoing total hip arthroplasty, making hip prosthesis survival rates an important issue. Cementless total hip arthroplasty provides better prosthesis longevity than does cemented hip arthroplasty, especially in younger patients. Because there is growing support in the literature for tapered geometry in cementless femoral components, we evaluated short-term results for total hip arthroplasty using Cementless Spotorno (CLS) titanium stems. We performed 100 consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties in 87 patients during a 9-year period using CLS stems. Outcome was assessed in terms of survival rate and Harris Hip Score. The stem survival rate was 99%, and the average Harris Hip Score improved from 41 before surgery to 92 at a mean point of 5 years after surgery. Only 1 hip underwent stem revision for a periprosthetic shaft femur fracture caused by high-velocity trauma from a vehicle accident that occurred 6 months after the original surgery. The CLS stems have an excellent survival rate in the short term, especially in younger patients, but long-term studies are required to provide a fuller picture.     

Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty After Failed Hip Arthroscopy: A Case-Control Study

Background

Hip arthroscopy is increasingly being used in joint preservation surgery with clear benefits in the treatment of prearthritic conditions. A number of patients, however, will still go on to require subsequent hip arthroplasty, and at present, little evidence exists determining the impact that prior hip arthroscopy may have on the outcomes of a subsequent arthroplasty.

Wear Analysis of 39 Conserve Plus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Retrievals

There have been increasing concerns regarding adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) following metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasties. This study examined wear rates in retrievals of one design of MOM resurfacing arthroplasty, and assessed the differences in wear between those with and without ALTR. Wear measurements were made on 39 MOM resurfacing components (30 femoral, 9 acetabular) which were at least 2 years in vivo. Seven hips (6 patients; 4 acetabular components, 7 femoral components) were identified to have ALTR. Acetabular component abduction and anteversion angles were determined using EBRA, and the contact-patch-to-rim (CPR) distance was calculated. The ALTR group had higher linear femoral and acetabular wear rates, acetabular anteversion and abduction angles, lower CPR, and longer time to revision. Given the increased risk for ALTR associated with acetabular component malpositioning, patients with malpositioned acetabular components may require closer clinical follow-up and monitoring.     

The Result of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Metallosis Following a Catastrophic Failure of a Polyethylene Liner

BackgroundWear cannot be completely prevented after total hip arthroplasty. If severe polyethylene (PE) liner wear develops, the so-called catastrophic failure occurs and metallosis develops. We postulated that longevity of the new implant may be affected after revision surgery for metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner due to the substantial amount of PE wear particles and infiltration of the metal particles in this catastrophic condition.MethodsTwenty-three hips of 23 patients were identified because they showed metallosis during revision total hip arthroplasties performed in Seoul National University Hospital between January 1996 and August 2004. They were followed for at least 6.5 years after the index revision total hip arthroplasty. The clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasties in these patients were evaluated.ResultsThe median Harris hip score increased from 60 points before revision total hip arthroplasties to 90 points at the final follow-up. Osteolysis was detected at an average of 9.3 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 13 hips and acetabular cup loosening at average 9.8 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 9 hips. With radiographic evidence of osteolysis and loosening as the end points, the 15-year survival rates were 28.2% and 56.0%, respectively.ConclusionsThe survival rate of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner was low.     

The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Lavage in Preventing Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundDilute povidone-iodine (PI) lavage, a simple disinfection method, could reduce postoperative infection risk. However, there is no clinical consensus regarding its efficacy in total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PI lavage’s efficacy in preventing infection after TJA.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before November 22, 2019, that compared postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent TJA with or without PI lavage before wound closure. Subgroup analyses were designed to identify the differences in infection site (overall or deep), type of surgery (total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty), time until diagnosis of infection (3 or 12 months postoperatively), and primary/aseptic revision arthroplasties.ResultsWe included 7 studies with 31,213 TJA cases, comprising 8861 patients who received PI lavage and 22,352 who did not. Pooled odds ratio for overall infection rate for the PI and non-PI lavage groups was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.19, P = .17) and for the deep infection rate was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.98, P = .86). Subgroup analyses revealed no differences in postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups in terms of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, diagnosis of infection at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, or primary and aseptic revision arthroplasties.ConclusionWe detected no differences in the overall postoperative infection rates between the PI and non-PI lavage groups before wound closure in TJA including all studies in the subgroup analyses.