The persistence of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization after mupirocin and topical chlorhexidine: implications for patients requiring multiple or delayed procedures

Preoperative screening and decolonization of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) are advocated to reduce surgical site infections. We determined the rate and duration of decolonization in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery were seen in our preoperative testing program (PAT) and had their anterior nares cultured for MRSA and MSSA. All patients were treated with intranasal mupirocin and a topical chlorhexidine solution. A cohort of patients returned to PAT before a subsequent elective procedure and were recultured. All culture results and time between PAT visits were recorded, and the rates of successful initial and persistent decolonization were determined. Six hundred ten patients visited PAT 1290 times. Overall, 94 (70.1%) of 134 patients with initially MRSA- or MSSA-positive cultures remained decolonized at a mean time of 156 days (SD=140), whereas 40 patients (29.9%) were not decolonized by the time of repeat testing at a mean time of 213 days (SD=187). At repeat testing, there were 2 newly MRSA-positive and 35 newly MSSA-positive patients. Staphylococcus aureus decolonization with intranasal mupirocin and topical chlorhexidine was effective but not persistent in a significant proportion of patients. A small number of previously uncolonized patients became colonized. Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization protocols must be repeated before any readmission, regardless of prior colonization status.     

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis

A systematic evaluation was conducted to assess the efficacy of two disinfectants, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine, as primary components in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). A comprehensive computerised search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine disinfection for the prevention of SSI from inception until July 2023. Two independent researchers completed literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Ultimately, 20 RCTs were included, which included 13 133 patients, with 6460 patients in the chlorhexidine group and 6673 patients in the povidone-iodine group. The meta-analysis results revealed that the incidence rate of surgical site wound infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58–0.78, p < 0.001)], superficial SSI rate (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46–0.75, p < 0.001) and deep SSI rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31–0.79, p = 0.003) were all lower in patients subjected to chlorhexidine disinfection compared to those patients receiving povidone-iodine disinfection. Existing evidence suggests that chlorhexidine is more effective than povidone-iodine at preventing SSI. However, owing to the potential quality limitations of the included studies, further validation through high-quality large-scale RCTs is warranted.     

Risk Factors for Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in Joint Arthroplasty Patients

Background

Several studies have shown that Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) nasal colonization is associated with surgical site infection and that preoperative decolonization can reduce infection rates. Up to 30% of joint arthroplasty patients have positive S aureus nasal swabs. Patient risk factors for colonization remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a specific patient population at increased risk of S aureus nasal colonization.

Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection after intertrochanteric fracture surgery: A prospective cohort study

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a challenging complication after intertrochanteric fracture surgery but without a large‐sample size study to investigate the incidence and risk factors of it. The present study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of SSI after intertrochanteric fracture surgery. A total of 1941 patients underwent intertrochanteric fracture surgery between October 2014 and December 2018 were included. Demographic data, surgical variables, and preoperative laboratory indexes were obtained from a prospective database and reviewed by hospital records. The optimum cut‐off value for quantitative data was detected by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The univariate analysis and multivariable analysis were conducted to analyse the risk factors. In total, 25 patients (1.3%) developed SSI, including 22(1.1%) superficial infection and 3(0.2%) deep infection. After adjustment of multiple variables, gender (odds ratio[OR] 2.64, P = .024), time to surgery>4 days (OR 2.41, P = .046), implant (intramedullary or extramedullary devices) (OR 2.96, P = .036), ALB<35 g/L (OR 2.88, P = .031) remained significant factors. In conclusion, the incidence of SSI after intertrochanteric fractures surgery was 1.3%, with 1.1% for superficial and 0.2% for deep infection. Gender, time to surgery>4 days, the implant (intramedullary or extramedullary devices), and ALB<35 g/L were independent risk factors for the rate of SSI.     

A vascular multi-arm multi-stage trial to prevent groin wound surgical site infection: A feasibility survey

Surgical site infection (SSI) is common following arterial surgery involving a groin incision. There is a lack of evidence regarding interventions to prevent groin wound SSI, therefore, a survey of vascular clinicians was undertaken to assess current opinion and practice, equipoise and feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants at the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting were surveyed regarding three separate interventions designed to prevent SSI in the groin; impregnated incise drapes, diakylcarbomoyl chloride dressings and antibiotic impregnated collagen sponges. Results were collated via an online survey using the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. Seventy-five participants completed the questionnaire, most were consultant vascular surgeons (50/75, 66.7%). The majority agree that groin wound SSI is a major problem (73/75, 97.3%), and would be content using either of the three interventions (51/61, 83.6%) and had clinical equipoise to randomise patients to any of the three interventions versus standard of care (70/75, 93.3%). There was some reluctance to not use impregnated incise drapes as may be considered “standard of care”. Groin wound SSI is perceived as major problem in vascular surgery, and a multicentre RCT of three preventative interventions appears acceptable to vascular surgeons.     

Economic Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Cloths on Healthcare Costs due to Surgical Site Infections Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall annual healthcare cost savings of adding a pre-operative chlorhexidine cloth preparation protocol. We used reports from the National Healthcare Safety Network and previously published reports to determine a range of surgical site infection rates following total knee arthroplasty and the cost per revision procedure. The savings listed are potential, but may be less. The cost benefit of using chlorhexidine at our institution per 1,000 total knee arthroplasty patients was a net savings of approximately $2.1 million. The annual healthcare savings ranged from $0.78 to $3.18 billion. This epidemiologic evaluation of using chlorhexidine prior to undergoing total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated the potential to decrease healthcare costs primarily by decreasing the incidence of surgical site infections.     

Challenges in reporting surgical site infections to the national surgical site infection surveillance and suggestions for improvement

IntroductionMandatory orthopaedic surgical site infection (SSI) data in England are used as a benchmark to compare infection rates between participating hospitals. According to the national guidelines, trusts are required to submit their data for at least one quarter of the year but they are free to report for all quarters. Owing to this ambiguity, there is a concern about robust reporting across trusts and therefore the accuracy of these data. There is also concern about the accuracy of collection methods. The aim of this five-year retrospective study was to assess the accuracy of SSI reporting at two hospitals in South East England under the same trust.MethodsA retrospective review was carried out of five years of electronic medical records, microbiology data and readmission data of all patients who underwent hip and knee replacement surgery at these hospitals. These data were validated with the data submitted to Public Health England (PHE) and any discrepancy between the two was noted.ResultsA significant difference was found in the SSI rates reported by the surveillance staff and our retrospective method.ConclusionsOur study confirms the findings of a national survey, which raised concerns about the quality of SSI reporting and the usefulness of PHE SSI data for benchmarking purposes. To our knowledge, there are no previously published studies that have looked at the accuracy of the English orthopaedic SSI surveillance. In the light of our findings, there is an urgent need for external validation studies to identify the extent of the problem in the surveillance scheme. The governing bodies should also issue clear guidelines for reporting SSIs to maintain homogeneity and to present the true incidence of SSI. We suggest some measures that we have instituted to address these inadequacies that have led to significant improvements in reporting at our trust.     

Reliability and feasibility of registered nurses conducting web‐based surgical site infection surveillance in the community: A prospective cohort study

Surgical site infections increase health care costs, morbidity, and mortality in 2% to 5% of surgical patients. Standardised post‐surgical surveillance is rare in community settings, causing under‐reporting and under‐serving of the documented 60% of surgical site infections occurring following hospital discharge. This study evaluated feasibility and concordance (inter‐rater reliability) of paired registered nurses using a web‐based surveillance tool (how2trakSSI, based on validated guidelines) to detect surgical site infections for up to 30 days after surgery in a cohort of 101 patients referred to Calea Home Care Clinics in Toronto, Canada, March 2015 to July 2016. After paired registered nurse assessors used the tool‐less than 10 minutes apart to measure concordance 5 to 7 days postoperatively, they provided feedback on its usefulness at two teleconference discussion groups September 6 to 7, 2016. Overall concordance between assessors was 0.822, remaining consistently above 0.65 across assessor education level and experience, patient age and weight, and wound area. Assessors documented 39.6% surgical site infection prevalence 5 to 7 days after surgery, confirming clinical need, relevance, reliability, and feasibility of using this web‐based tool to standardise community surgical site infection surveillance, noting that it was user‐friendly, more efficient to use than traditional paper‐based tools and useful as a registry for tracking progress.     

骨科清洁切口手术部位感染的危险因素分析

目的 分析骨科清洁切口手术部位感染（SSI）的危险因素,总结降低骨科清洁切口SSI发病率的经验。方法 对某医院2015年6月-2016年12月实施骨科清洁手术的患者进行SSI监测,结合国内外文献中常见骨科术后SSI高危因素：患者高龄、ASA评分高、传统备皮方法、手术时间长、手术类型复杂、不合理使用抗菌药物、留置引流管等进行统计并行单因素卡方检验,筛选出阳性危险因素,对阳性危险因素进行多因素Logistic回归分析。结果 共监测患者792例,发生SSI 17例,SSI发病率为2.15%。单因素分析结果显示,患者高龄、ASA评分Ⅱ级及以上、传统备皮方法、手术时间长、手术类型复杂、不合理使用抗菌药物是骨科清洁切口SSI相关阳性危险因素（均P<0.05）。患者性别、手术医生（主刀）的级别和操作技巧、留置引流管与术后SSI无相关性。多因素logistic分析结果显示：患者ASA评分Ⅱ级及以上、传统备皮法、手术时间＞3h会增加骨科清洁手术后SSI的风险,其中手术时间＞3h导致的SSI风险最高（OR: 4.08, 95%CI: 1.36-12.35）,其次是患者ASA评分Ⅱ级及以上（OR: 3.46,95%CI：1.98-21.12）,而传统备皮法在所有阳性危险因素中风险最小（OR:2.97,95%CI：1.08-14.71）。结论 患者ASA评分Ⅱ级及以上、传统备皮法、手术时间＞3h会增加骨科清洁手术后SSI的风险,医务人员应充分认识和了解这些危险因素,在围手术期最大可能地优化各项可调控因素,最大限度地降低骨科清洁切口SSI的发生率。     

MRSA鼻腔筛查可排除MRSA手术部位感染：一项诊断实验meta分析

目的评价耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌（MRSA）鼻腔筛查对于MRSA手术部位感染的诊断价值。 方法检索PubMed、EMBASE、中国知网和万方数据库中,有关MRSA鼻腔筛查与MRSA手术部位感染的文献。纳入文献时间从数据库建立到2019年3月。使用诊断实验质量评价表（QUADAS-2）进行质量评价。采用STATA软件进行分析,结局指标为灵敏度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。 结果最终纳入10篇文献,共39 831名患者。MRSA鼻腔筛查对于诊断及预测MRSA手术部位感染的灵敏度为37%（95% CI：27%,48%）、特异度为95%（95% CI：94%,96%）。阳性似然比为7.98（95% CI：6.37,10.0）,阴性似然比为0.66（95% CI：0.57,0.77）,阳性预测值为9.6%,阴性预测值为99.3%,DOR为12.0（95% CI：8.62,16.8）。异质性来源于MRSA筛查时使用的鉴定方法（PCR法/细菌培养法）。Deeks漏斗图显示,纳入研究不存在发表偏倚。 结论MRSA鼻腔筛查对于筛查MRSA手术部位感染具有较高的特异度和阴性预测值,可用于排除MRSA肺炎,患者鼻腔未定植MRSA,则发展为MRSA手术部位感染的可能性较小。所以,MRSA鼻腔筛查可作为规范抗菌药物经验性用药的一种有效管理工具,尤其可用于减少无鼻腔定植者的经验性治疗。     

Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants to prevent surgical site infection

This report is based on a Hygienist Panel Meeting held at St Anne''s Manor, Wokingham on 24–25 June 2009. The panel agreed that greater use should be made of antiseptics to reduce reliance on antibiotics with their associated risk of antibiotic resistance. When choosing an antiseptic for clinical use, the Biocompatibility Index, which considers both the microbiocidal activity and any cytotoxic effects of an antiseptic agent, was considered to be a useful tool. The need for longer and more proactive post-discharge surveillance of surgical patients was also agreed to be a priority, especially given the current growth of day-case surgery. The introduction of surgical safety checklists, such as the World Health Organization''s Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative, is a useful contribution to improving safety and prevention of SSIs and should be used universally. Considering sutures as ‘implants’, with a hard or non-shedding surface to which micro-organisms can form biofilm and cause surgical site infections, was felt to be a useful concept.     

Impact of negative pressure wound treatment on incidence of surgical site infection in varied orthopedic surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a popular treatment to heal infected wounds. This meta-analysis aimed to determine if NPWT was more effective than conventional wound dressings for surgical site infections (SSI) in varied orthopaedic surgeries. Literature was retrieved from seven electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and CNKI). Randomised control trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (RS) involving arthroplasty, fracture, and spinal surgery were extracted. SSI was our primary outcome, while total complications and length of hospital stay were secondary outcomes. We carried out the risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and Stata 17.0. Among the 798 studies retrieved, 18 of them met our inclusion criteria. We identified 13 RCTs and 5 RSs. The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of SSI in the NPWT group was significantly lower relative to the control group (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.77, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the incidences of SSI involving arthroplasty, fracture, and spinal surgery in the NPWT group accounted for 46%, 69%, and 37% relative to the control group, respectively. The incidence of SSI in RS (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56) was significantly lower than that in RCT (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90) (P = 0.02). Moreover, patients in the NPWT group had a lower total complication rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76) and shorter hospital stays (SMD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.83 to −0.02), although high heterogeneity existed. NPWT may be an efficient alternative to help prevent the incidence of SSI and total complications as well as achieved shorten hospital stay in varied orthopaedic surgeries. The rational use of NPWT should be based on the presence of patients' clinical conditions and relevant risk factors.     

围手术期不同抗生素使用时长对预防脊柱手术部位感染有效性的网状Meta分析

【摘要】 目的：对围手术期不同抗生素使用时长预防脊柱手术部位感染（surgical site infection,SSI）的有效性进行评价。方法：计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普、万方数据库,搜集围手术期预防性抗生素的使用时长对降低脊柱SSI发生率的临床研究。研究类型包括随机对照试验（randomized controlled trial,RCT）和队列研究（cohort study,CS）。检索时限为2000年1月1日～2020年5月4日。由2名研究者严格遵循纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、数据提取和文献质量评价。将抗生素使用时长分为单剂量组、术后24h组、术后48h组和术后超48h组。应用Stata 14软件进行网状Meta分析,比较不同抗生素使用时长对降低脊柱SSI发生率的有效性。结果：共纳入10篇文献,包括5篇RCT、2篇前瞻性队列研究和3篇回顾性队列研究,涉及4类抗生素使用时长（单剂量、术后24h、术后48h、术后超48h）。网状Meta分析结果显示：在降低脊柱SSI发生率方面,术后24h组[RR=0.48,95%CI （0.23,0.99）]和术后超48h组[RR=0.52,95%CI（0.32,0.84）]优于单剂量,其差异有统计学意义;排序结果显示术后24h组优于其他使用时长。结论：当前证据显示抗生素使用时长为术后24h时对预防脊柱SSI的效果最佳。     

Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Demonstrate a Temporal and Dose-Dependent Relationship with the Rate of Postoperative Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundCorticosteroid injections (CSI) are commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. There is concern, however, that these injections may increase the risk of postoperative infection if a subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed. The purpose of the present investigation is to determine the relationship between CSI and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and surgical site infections (SSIs) following THA.MethodsThe PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing THA from 2011 to 2018. Patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis who received an intra-articular hip CSI prior to ipsilateral THA were matched in a sequential 1:1 fashion based on age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index with THA patients who did not receive an injection in the preoperative period. PJI and SSI within 6 months of the surgical procedure were recorded. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression. Results were considered significant at P < .05.ResultsIn total, 29,058 patients underwent a hip CSI within 6 months prior to THA. CSI within 4 months of surgery was associated with a higher incidence of PJI at 6-month follow up (1.6% vs 1.1%, P = .040). An injection within 1 month of surgery corresponded to a higher odds of PJI (odds ratio [OR] 1.97) than an injection 4 months prior to surgery (OR 1.24). Furthermore, the quantity of CSI administered within the 3 months prior to THA demonstrated a dose-dependent relationship, with each subsequent injection increasing odds of PJI (OR 1.45-3.59). A similar relationship was observed for SSI.ConclusionThere appears to be both a time and dose-dependent association of hip CSI and PJI following THA. Surgeons should consider delaying elective THA if a CSI has been administered within the 4 months prior to the planned procedure.     

Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the common postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery. Previous studies have explored the risk factors (such as age, diabetes, anaemia and ASA score) for SSI in patients with gastric cancer. However, there are large differences in the research results, and the correlation coefficients of different research results are quite different. We aim to investigate the risk factors of surgical site infection in patients with gastric cancer. We queried four English databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biological Medicine Database, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP Database)) to identify published literature related to risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with gastric cancer. Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 15.0 were used in this meta-analysis. A total of 15 articles (n = 6206) were included in this analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection in gastric cancer: male (OR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.06, 1.55]), age >60 (OR = 2.75, 95% CI [1.65, 4.57]), smoking (OR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.46, 2.73]), diabetes (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.59, 2.61]), anaemia (OR = 4.72, 95% CI [1.66, 13.40]), preoperative obstruction (OR = 3.07, 95% CI [1.80, 5.23]), TNM ≥ III (OR = 2.05, 95% CI [1.56, 2.70]), hypoproteinemia (OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.08, 4.49]), operation time ≥3 h (OR = 8.33, 95% CI [3.81, 18.20]), laparotomy (OR = 2.18, 95% CI [1.61, 2.94]) and blood transfusion (OR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.01, 2.06]). This meta-analysis showed that male, age >60, smoking, diabetes, anaemia, preoperative obstruction, TNM ≥ III, hypoproteinemia, operation time ≥3 h, open surgery and blood transfusion were the risk factors for SSI in patients with gastric cancer.     

Knee and hip arthroplasty joint surgical site wound infection in end-stage renal disease subjects who underwent dialysis or a kidney transplant: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study to assess the knee and hip arthroplasty joint surgical site wound infection (SSWI) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) subjects who underwent dialysis or a kidney transplant (KT). A comprehensive literature examination till February 2023 was implemented and 1046 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 5 471 898 subjects with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at the baseline, 13 049 of them were haemodialysis or renal transplant, and 5 458 849 were control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of knee and hip arthroplasty SSWI in ESRD subjects who underwent dialysis or a KT by the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Haemodialysis or renal transplant had a significantly higher postoperative SSWI (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73–2.62, P < .001) compared with control in TJA subjects. However, no significant difference was observed between haemodialysis and renal transplant in postoperative SSWI (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.16–5.54, P = .94) and between haemodialysis or renal transplant and control in prosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.25–4.55, P = .93) in TJA subjects. Haemodialysis had a significantly higher prosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.21–3.03, P = .005) compared with renal transplant in TJA subjects. Haemodialysis or renal transplant had a significantly higher postoperative SSWI in TJA subjects. Also, haemodialysis had a significantly higher prosthetic joint infection compared with renal transplant in TJA subjects. Although precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences because a low number of selected studies was picked for certain comparisons in this meta-analysis.     

Effect of serologic malnutrition on postoperative wound infection problems after total joint arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of serologic malnutrition on postoperative wound infection problems after total joint arthroplasty. A systematic literature search up to April 2022, was performed and 446 501 subjects with total joint arthroplasty at the baseline of the studies; 200 433 of them were confirmed serologic malnutrition, and 246 068 were confirmed normal nutrition. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of serologic malnutrition on postoperative wound infection problems after total joint arthroplasty using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. The serologic malnutrition subjects had a significantly higher wound disruption (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.53–2.53, P < 0.001), higher superficial incisional surgical site infection (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.67–5.01, P < 0.001), higher deep incisional surgical site infection (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.36–3.96, P < 0.001), and higher organ space surgical site infection (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.34–4.24, P < 0.001) in subjects after total joint arthroplasty compared with normal nutrition. The serologic malnutrition subjects had a significantly higher wound disruption, superficial incisional surgical site infection, deep incisional surgical site infection, and organ space surgical site infection in subjects after total joint arthroplasty compared with normal nutrition. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low number of studies in certain comparisons.