Tetanic Stimulation of the Peripheral Nerve before Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Can Enlarge Amplitudes of Myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials during General Anesthesia with Neuromuscular Blockade

Background: Neuromuscular blockade can suppress myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The authors hypothesized that tetanic stimulation (TS) of the peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation may enhance myogenic MEPs during neuromuscular blockade. In the current study, the authors evaluated MEP augmentations by TS at different levels of duration, posttetanic interval, neuromuscular blockade, and stimulus intensity.

Methods: Thirty-two patients undergoing propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia were examined. Train-of-five stimulation was delivered to C3-C4, and MEPs were recorded from the abductor hallucis muscle. In study 1, TS with a duration of 1, 3, or 5 s was delivered at 50 Hz to the tibial nerve 1, 3, or 5 s (interval) before transcranial stimulation, and the effects of TS on MEP amplitude were evaluated. In study 2, TS-induced MEP augmentations were evaluated at the neuromuscular blockade level (%T1) of 50% or 5%. In study 3, MEP augmentations by TS at stimulus intensities of 0, 5, 25, and 50 mA were evaluated.

Results: The application of TS significantly enlarged the amplitudes of MEPs at the combinations of duration (3, 5 s) and interval (1, 3, 5 s) compared with those without TS. TS-induced MEP augmentations were similarly observed at %T1 of both 50% and 5%. TS-induced MEP augmentations were observed at stimulus intensities of 25 and 50 mA.     

外周神经强直刺激对脑功能区肿瘤切除术患者颅内直接电刺激运动诱发电位的影响

目的 探讨外周神经强直刺激对脑功能区肿瘤切除术患者颅内直接电刺激运动诱发电位(MEP)的影响.方法 择期拟行神经外科脑功能区肿瘤切除术患者8例,异丙酚复合芬太尼麻醉,在肌松监测下单次静脉注射维库溴铵,维持部分肌松.给予颅内运动区皮质及皮质下锥体束5个成串刺激,分别记录两组数据.第一组在一侧拇短展肌记录常规MEP(C-MEP),同侧胫神经给予持续时间5 s、频率50 Hz、强度50 mA的强直刺激,刺激后1 s以同样方法记录强直刺激后MEP(P-MEP).第二组在一侧胫骨前肌记录C-MEP,对侧胫神经给予持续时间5 s、频率50 Hz、强度50 mA的强直刺激,刺激后1 s以同样方法记录P-MEP.每一组C-MEP的记录和P-MEP的记录采用随机交叉的方法,间隔时间为120 s,观察不良反应的发生情况.结果 在拇短展肌和胫骨前肌记录的MEP波幅,P-MEP明显高于C-MEP,3例患者术中皮质刺激时出现体动.无术中知晓及其他与电刺激有关的并发症发生.结论 外周强直刺激可以增大脑功能区肿瘤切除术患者拇短展肌与胫骨前肌颅内直接电刺激MEP的波幅.     

Monitoring of motor evoked potentials during insertion of iliosacral screws for reconstruction of pelvic fracture in two patients

Monitoring of myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial electrical stimulation has become a promising tool for intraoperative monitoring. We described 2 patients who had developed significant decrease in MEP during the insertion of iliosacral screws for reconstruction of pelvic fractures. In both patients, MEPs were successfully obtained prior to the insertion under general anesthesia and partial neuromuscular blockade (propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide in oxygen: vecuronium), but reduced in association with the insertion. In one patient, they were restored by the re-insertion of screw and no new neurological deficits were observed postoperatively. However, in another patient, the decrease was not normalized and he suffered from paresis of the lower extremities after the surgery. We consider that intraoperative changes in MEPs could precisely predict postoperative motor function.     

Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery

The feasibility and reliability of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery were evaluated. Forty-eight patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms underwent craniotomy and neck clipping accompanied by muscle MEP monitoring. MEPs were elicited successfully by transcranial electrical stimulation in all patients. Direct cortical stimulation elicited MEPs in 44 patients. Reduction in MEP amplitude to less than 50% of baseline was considered significant. No postoperative motor paresis occurred in 39 patients in whom transcranial and direct MEPs remained unchanged. Four patients in whom direct MEPs could not be recorded had no intraoperative abnormality in transcranial MEPs and no postoperative motor dysfunction. Four of the other 5 patients manifested significant transient direct MEP changes without transcranial MEP changes. The transient MEP changes were observed in 3 patients during temporary clipping of the parent artery and in one patient with inadequate clipping of an middle cerebral artery aneurysm, and were considered due to insufficiency of blood flow. Decrease or disappearance of direct MEP waves recovered immediately after re-application of the clip and release of the temporary clip. Direct MEP waves disappeared and did not recover until the end of microsurgical procedures in one patient, although transcranial MEP amplitude remained at less than 50% of baseline. She developed hemiparesis postoperatively, which recovered within 6 hours. The duration of temporary occlusion in patients with direct MEP changes was significantly longer than that in patients without (p < 0.05). Direct MEP was sensitive in detecting ischemic stress to descending motor pathways during aneurysm surgery. Transcranial MEPs could be elicited in patients in whom direct MEPs could not be obtained, and during periods such as craniotomy or after dural closure, in which direct MEPs could not be recorded. These findings suggest that combined transcranial and direct cortical MEP recording may improve the feasibility and reliability of MEP monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery.     

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: Postoperative paraplegia is one of the most dreaded complications after descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. In this study, intraoperative monitoring was applied during resection of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms to detect spinal cord ischemia and help prevent paraplegia. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (descending thoracic, 25; thoracoabdominal, 31) were monitored intraoperatively with both motor- (MEP) and somatosensory- (SSEP) evoked potentials. MEPs were elicited with transcranial electrical stimulation and recorded from the spinal epidural space (D wave) or peripheral muscles (myogenic MEP). SSEPs were obtained with median and tibial nerve stimulation. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients (28.6%) showed MEP evidence of spinal cord ischemia, only 4 of whom had delayed congruent SSEP changes. In 13 patients (23.2%), ischemic changes in MEPs were reversed by reimplanting segmental arteries or increasing blood flow or blood pressure. None of these 13 patients suffered acute paraplegia regardless of the status of SSEP at the end of the procedure, but 1 of them developed delayed postoperative paraplegia after multisystem failure. Three patients (5.4%) who had persistent loss of MEPs despite of recovery of SSEPs awoke paraplegic. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that compared with SSEP, MEP, especially myogenic MEP, is more sensitive and specific in detection of spinal cord ischemia, and that intraoperative monitoring can indeed help prevent paraplegia.     

The influence of nitrous oxide to supplement fentanyl/low-dose propofol anesthesia on transcranial myogenic motor-evoked potentials during thoracic aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation (tc MEPs) is a new method to assess the integrity of the motor pathways. The authors studied the effects of 50% nitrous oxide (N2O) and a low-dose propofol infusion on tc MEPs paired electrical stimulation during fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade. DESIGN: Cross-over study. SETTING: St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients scheduled to undergo surgery on the thoracoabdominal aorta were studied; 6 women aged 54 to 69 years and 4 men aged 68 to 77 years. INTERVENTIONS: After achieving a stable anesthetic state and before surgery, tc MEPs were recorded during four 15-minute periods: (I) air/oxygen (O2; F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 0.5 microg/mL; (II) N2O/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 0.5 microg/mL; (III) N2O/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%; propofol target blood concentration, 1.0 microg/mL; and (IV) air/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 1.0 microg/mL. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tc MEPs were recorded from the right extensor digitorum communis muscle and the right tibialis anterior muscle. The right thenar muscle was used for recording the level of relaxation; the T1 response was maintained at 40% to 70% of the control compound muscle action potential. There was no significant difference in onset latency among the four phases. The addition of N2O and doubling the target propofol infusion to 1.0 microg/mL resulted in a 40% to 50% reduction of tc MEP amplitude recorded in the extensor digitorum communis muscle and tibialis anterior muscle (p < 0.01). During each phase, tc MEPs could be elicited and interpreted, except in one patient, in whom no tc MEPs could be elicited in the leg because of technical problems. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that tc MEP monitoring is feasible during low-dose propofol, fentanyl/50% N2O in 02 anesthesia and partial neuromuscular blockade.     

经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位在脊柱脊髓术中监测的应用研究

目的 探索应用经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位(TMS-MEP)在脊柱脊髓手术中进行神经监测的可行性和有效性.方法 2001年2月至2004年6月间在我科接受脊柱脊髓手术共37例患者,术中分别使用常规方法和依托咪酯+芬太尼技术进行麻醉,应用双频指数(BIS)和四个成串刺激(TOF)监测麻醉深度与肌松状态,使用TMS-MEP进行术中监测.比较不同麻醉方法和麻醉深度对TMS-MEP的影响,并分析TMS-MEP监测操作的可行性及其对手术操作的影响.结果 以安氟醚或异氟醚维持麻醉的11例患者无法记录到TMS-MEP;使用依托咪酯+芬太尼技术麻醉的26例患者,MEP均记录良好.与麻醉前相比,术中的MEP波形一般都能够保持,但其波幅显著下降、潜伏期亦明显延长(P<0.05).随着麻醉和肌松的加深,MEP的波幅会进一步降低,而潜伏期的变化相对较小.在麻醉相对平稳的情况下,MEP波幅能保持相当的平稳.MEP操作对手术没有明显的不良影响.成功记录MEP的患者中有6例(23%)因为术中MEP波幅下降超过50%而向术者发出报警,其中仅1例患者术后肌力较术前下降.结论 应用TMS-MEP进行脊柱脊髓手术的术中监测是一项有效而切实可行的技术,依托咪酯+芬太尼麻醉技术适用于使用TMS-MEP进行术中监测的手术,BIS、TOF等麻醉、肌松监测指标的应用有助于维持术中麻醉的平稳和对TMS-MEP监测结果的判断.     

The effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials to electrical stimulation with a single pulse and a train of pulses under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia in rabbits

In the present study, we investigated the effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in rabbits. The influence of stimulation paradigms to induce MEPs was evaluated. Twelve rabbits anesthetized with ketamine, fentanyl, and propofol were used for the study. Myogenic MEPs in response to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex with a single pulse and a train of three and five pulses were recorded from the soleus muscle. After the control recording of MEPs at 38 degrees C of esophageal temperature, the rabbits were cooled by surface cooling. Esophageal temperature was maintained at 35 degrees C, 32 degrees C, 30 degrees C, and 28 degrees C, and MEPs were recorded at each point. MEP amplitude to single- pulse stimulation was significantly reduced with a re-duction of core temperature to 28 degrees C compared with the control value at 38 degrees C (0.8 +/- 0.4 mV versus 2.3 +/- 0.3 mV; P < 0.05), whereas MEP amplitude to train-pulse stimulation did not change significantly during the cooling. MEP latency was increased linearly with a reduction of core temperature regardless of stimulation paradigms. In conclusion, these results indicate that a reduction of core temperature to 28 degrees C did not influence MEP amplitudes as long as a train of pulses, but not a single pulse, was used for stimulation in rabbits under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) may be required under hypothermic conditions because of its neuroprotective efficacy. However, data on the influence of hypothermia on myogenic MEPs are limited. The results indicate that multipulse stimulation may be better than single-pulse stimulation when monitoring MEPs during hypothermia.     

Noxious stimuli do not modify myogenic motor evoked potentials by electrical stimulation during anesthesia with propofol-based anesthesia

PURPOSE: To investigate whether motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial electrical stimulation under constant blood propofol concentration are affected by the arousing effect of surgical noxious stimuli. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent elective spinal surgery were studied. Patients were anesthetized with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, fentanyl, and propofol to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) score around 50. MEP in response to a multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation at stimulus sites of C3-C4 were recorded over the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle. Changes of peak-to-peak amplitude and onset latency of MEP, BIS score before and after surgical stimuli were evaluated. Propofol plasma concentration was measured at the same time points. RESULTS: Both MEP amplitude and latency did not change significantly after surgical stimuli although BIS increased significantly (48 +/- 6 to 58 +/- 5; P < 0.05). Plasma propofol concentration was maintained at the same level between the two measurement points (3.3 +/- 0.7 to 3.3 +/- 0.7 micro g*mL(-1)). There was no relation between BIS change and changes of MEP amplitude and latency, and propofol plasma concentration. CONCLUSION: MEP to the transcranial electrical stimulation under a constant and clinically appropriate blood propofol concentration are not affected by surgical noxious stimuli.     

Quantitative assessment of myelopathy patients using motor evoked potentials produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) study using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may give a functional assessment of corticospinal conduction. But there are no large studies on MEPs using TMS in myelopathy patients. The purpose of this study is to confirm the usefulness of MEPs for the assessment of the myelopathy and to investigate the use of MEPs using TMS as a screening tool for myelopathy. We measured the MEPs of 831 patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of myelopathy using TMS. The MEPs from the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles were evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the MEP latency. Later, 349 patients had surgery for myelopathy (operative group) and 482 patients were treated conservatively (nonoperative group). CMCTs in the operative group and nonoperative group were assessed. MEPs were prolonged in 711 patients (86%) and CMCTs were prolonged in 493 patients (59%) compared with the control patients. CMCTs from the ADM and AH in the operative group were significantly more prolonged than that in the nonoperative group. All patients in the operative group showed prolongation of MEPs or CMCTs or multiphase of the MEP wave. MEP abnormalities are useful for an electrophysiological evaluation of myelopathy patients. Moreover, MEPs may be effective parameters in spinal pathology for deciding the operative treatment.     

The modifying effects of stimulation pattern and propofol plasma concentration on motor-evoked potentials

The quality of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) largely depends on the stimulation pattern and anesthetic technique. Further improvement in intraoperative MEP recording requires exact knowledge of the modifying effects of each of these factors. Accordingly, we designed this study to characterize the modifying effect of different stimulation patterns during different propofol target plasma concentrations (PTPCs) on intraoperatively recorded transcranial electrical MEPs. In 12 patients undergoing craniotomy, stimulation patterns (300-500 V; 100-1000 Hz; 1-5 stimuli) were varied randomly at different PTPCs (2, 4, and 6 microg/mL). Remifentanil was administered unchanged at 0.2 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1). MEPs were recorded from the thenar and hypothenar muscles. Analysis of MEPs was blinded to the PTPC. Three-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects of increasing stimulation intensity, frequency, and number of stimuli on MEP amplitude (P < 0.05). Maximum MEP amplitudes and recording success rates were observed with three or more stimuli delivered at 1000 Hz and > or =150 V. A significant main effect of PTPC (2 vs 4 and 6 microg/mL) on MEP amplitude was observed at the thenar recording site only (P < 0.05). An amplitude ratio calculated from corresponding MEPs evoked by double and quadruple stimulation proved to be insensitive to changes in PTPC. In conclusion, MEP characteristics varied significantly in response to changes in stimulation pattern and less to changes in PTPC.     

The effects of xenon on myogenic motor evoked potentials in rabbits: a comparison with propofol and isoflurane

We compared the effects of xenon on myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with those of propofol and isoflurane in rabbits under ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia. Thirty animals were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups (n = 10 in each group). In the propofol group, propofol was administered at a rate of 0.4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (small) and 0.8 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (large). In the isoflurane group, isoflurane was administered at 0.8% (small) and 1.6% (large). In the xenon group, xenon was administered at 35% (small) and 70% (large). Myogenic MEPs in response to stimulation with single pulse and a train of 5 pulses were recorded from the soleus muscle before, during (at small and large doses), and after the administration of each anesthetic. With single-pulse stimulation, MEPs were recorded in 90% and 50% of animals at small and large doses of xenon, respectively, and MEP amplitudes in the xenon and isoflurane groups were significantly lower compared with those in the propofol group. With train pulse stimulation, MEPs were recorded in 100% and 90% of animals at small and large doses of xenon, respectively, and a reduction in MEP amplitudes by xenon was more prominent than by propofol but less than isoflurane at large doses. These results suggest that MEP recording may be feasible under xenon anesthesia if multipulse stimulation is used, although xenon has suppressive effects on myogenic MEPs.     

Effect of Isoflurane on Motor-evoked Potentials Induced by Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Exposed Motor Cortex with Single, Double, and Triple Stimuli in Rats

Background: The clinical application of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) has been hampered by their sensitivity to anesthetics. Recently, to overcome anesthetic-induced depression of myogenic MEPs, multiple stimulus setups with a paired or a train of pulses for stimulation of the motor cortex were reported. However, the effects of anesthetics on MEPs induced by these stimulation techniques are unknown.

Methods: Bipolar electrical stimulation of the left motor cortex was carried out in 15 rats anesthetized with thiopental while the compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the contralateral hind limb. After recording of the MEP in response to the single-shock stimulation of the motor cortex, paired pulses (double pulses) or a train of three pulses (triple pulses) with an interstimulus interval of each pulse at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ms were applied. After control MEP recording, isoflurane was administered at a concentration of 0.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC), 0.5 MAC, 0.75 MAC, and 1.0 MAC, and the effects of isoflurane on the MEPs induced by single, double, and triple pulses were evaluated.

Results: In all animals, distinct baseline MEPs were recorded. During the administration of 0.25 MAC and 0.5 MAC isoflurane, MEPs induced by stimulation with a single pulse could be recorded in 87% and 33% of animals, respectively, and MEP amplitude was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner. During the administration of 0.75 MAC isoflurane, MEPs after single-pulse stimulation could not be recorded in any animals. By stimulating with paired or triple pulses, the success rate of MEP recording and MEP amplitude significantly increased compared with those after single pulse before and during the administration of isoflurane. Both the success rate of MEP recording and MEP amplitude after double- and triple-pulse stimulation decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner during the administration of isoflurane.     

The effects of stimulation pattern and sevoflurane concentration on intraoperative motor-evoked potentials

The usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during inhaled anesthesia is limited by the suppressive effects of volatile anesthetics on MEP signals. We investigated the effects of different stimulation patterns and end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane on intraoperative transcranial electrical MEPs. In 12 patients undergoing craniotomy, stimulation patterns (300-500 V, 100-1000 Hz, 1-5 stimuli) and multiples (0.5, 0.75, and 1.0) of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane were varied randomly while remifentanil was administered at a constant rate of 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). MEPs were recorded from thenar and hypothenar muscles and analyzed without knowledge of the respective MAC. Three-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for increasing stimulation intensity, frequency, and number of stimuli on MEP amplitude (P < 0.05). Maximum MEP amplitudes and recording success rates were observed during 4 stimuli delivered at 1000 Hz and 300 V. A significant main effect of sevoflurane concentration (0.5 versus 0.75 and 1 MAC multiple) on MEP amplitude was observed at the thenar recording site only (P < 0.05). In conclusion, MEP characteristics varied significantly with changes in stimulation pattern and less so with changes in sevoflurane concentration. The results suggest that high frequency repetitive stimulation allows intraoperative use of MEP monitoring during up to 1 MAC multiple of sevoflurane and constant infusion of remifentanil up to 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1).     

Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgery

Dysfunction of spinal motor conduction during surgical procedures may not be reflected by changes in somatosensory evoked potential waveforms. A method of monitoring that allows direct and continuous assessment of motor function within the central nervous system during surgery would be useful. This paper describes one such method utilizing noninvasive electric cortical stimulation to evoke muscle activity (the motor evoked potential, or MEP) during surgery. The effect of isoflurane (superimposed on a baseline of N2O/narcotic anesthesia) on MEP's in response to cortical stimulation is specifically examined. Eight patients undergoing elective neurosurgical operations were included in the study. All patients received a background of general anesthesia and partial nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. The motor cortex was stimulated electrically via self-adhesive scalp electrodes. Electromyographic responses from multiple muscles were measured with subdermal electroencephalograph-type needle electrodes. Motor responses to stimulation were continually recorded on magnetic tape for off-line analysis. Once closing of the surgical incision was begun, a series of four to five stimuli of constant magnitude were applied to obtain "baseline" MEP responses. Patients were then ventilated with isoflurane for up to 8 minutes, during which time stimuli were continued every 15 to 20 seconds. Comparison was made of MEP responses for trials before, 1 minute after, and 5 minutes after the addition of isoflurane. All patients demonstrated reproducible motor responses to cortical stimulation during surgery. Addition of isoflurane [isoflurane)exp, less than or equal to 0.5%) to pre-existing anesthesia caused marked attenuation of MEP amplitudes in all patients within 5 minutes of its application, without affecting neuromuscular transmission as judged by direct peripheral nerve stimulation. It is concluded that: 1) monitoring motor system integrity and function with electric transcranial cortical stimulation during surgery is feasible when utilizing an N2O/narcotic anesthetic protocol; and 2) the quality of data obtained will likely suffer with the addition of isoflurane.     

Motor-evoked potential facilitation during progressive cortical suppression by propofol

We characterized the effects of various stimulation patterns on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by repetitive transcranial magnetoelectric stimulation at different levels of cortical suppression by propofol. In 20 patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery, propofol target plasma concentrations (PTPCs) were increased incrementally by target plasma-level controlled infusion during the induction of anesthesia. MEPs were recorded from the muscles of the upper extremities after single, double, and quadruple magnetoelectric stimulation at 500, 200, and 100 Hz. The mean PTPC during loss of responsiveness to verbal instructions (CP50) was 3 microg/mL (CP(95), 5 microg/mL). At PTPCs <3 microg/mL, maximal MEP amplitudes were elicited by quadruple stimulation at 100 Hz. At PTPCs > or =3 microg/mL, four pulses at 200 Hz yielded peak MEP amplitudes. Therefore, quadruple magnetoelectric stimulation at 100 Hz yields peak myogenic responses in awake patients. With progressive cortical suppression resulting from PTPCs beyond 3 microg/mL, the most effective stimulation frequency shifts to 200 Hz. This may be explained by a differential dose-dependent action of propofol on GABAergic cortical interneurons, corresponding to the clinically observed state of vigilance. Recording of spinal cord evoked potentials will aid in further elucidation of the modulatory effects of general anesthesia on intracortical facilitation. IMPLICATIONS: We investigated the effect of different transcranial magnetoelectric stimulation paradigms on motor-evoked potentials during different levels of cortical suppression by propofol. The most effective stimulation frequency seems to change from 100 to 200 Hz during progressive propofol dose escalation, possibly because of specific interaction with cortical interneurons.     

Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to examine whether transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is safe, feasible, and valuable for brain tumor surgery. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing brain tumor resection were studied, using nitrous oxide/propofol anesthesia. MEPs were continuously recorded throughout surgery, using a Sentinel 4 evoked potential system (Axon Systems, Inc., Hauppauge, NY). The MEPs were elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (train of 5; stimulation rate, 0.5-2 Hz; square wave pulse with a time constant of 0.5 ms; stimulation intensity, 40-160 mA) through spiral electrodes placed over the primary motor cortex and were recorded by needle electrodes inserted into the contralateral orbicularis oris, biceps, abductor pollicis brevis, and anterior tibialis muscles. When MEP amplitudes decreased by more than 50%, MEP stimulation was repeated, with increased stimulation intensity, and MEP changes were reported to the surgeon. The motor function of each patient was examined before and after surgery, using a reproducible scale. The relationship between MEP amplitude decreases and worsening motor status was analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS: Preoperative neurological examinations revealed mild to moderate motor deficits (2/5 to 4/5) for 38% of patients (19 of 50 patients). Most of the patients (96%) exhibited recordable baseline MEPs. Persistent MEP decreases of more than 50% were noted for eight patients (16%) (11 muscles). The MEPs were completely abolished in two patients (three muscles). The degree of postoperative worsening of motor status was correlated with the degree of intraoperative MEP amplitude reduction (r = -0.864; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Persistent intraoperative MEP reductions of more than 50% were associated with postoperative motor deficits. The degree of MEP amplitude reduction was correlated with postoperative worsening of motor status. Transcranial electrical MEP monitoring is feasible, safe, and valuable for brain tumor surgery.     

Total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data

OBJECT: Monitoring of descending corticospinal pathways by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) has proven to be useful in preventing permanent neurological deficits during cranial and spinal procedures. Difficulties in interpretation of intraoperative changes in potentials may largely be attributed to the effects of anesthesia. Development of suitable intravenous anesthesia protocols specifically tailored for MEP monitoring, including plasma level target-controlled infusion (TCI), requires precise knowledge of the specific neurophysiological properties of the various agents. METHODS: The effects of alfentanil, sufentanil, fentanyl, remifentanil, thiopental, midazolam, etomidate, ketamine, and propofol on neurogenic and myogenic MEPs were evaluated in an integral study combining clinical data obtained in 40 patients and experimental investigations conducted in 140 animals. The dose-dependent modulation of MEPs after electrical and magnetoelectrical stimulation of the motor cortex was recorded from peripheral muscles and the spinal cord. The results were as follows: opioids, propofol, and thiopental suppressed myogenic, but not neurogenic MEPs in a dose-dependent fashion; remifentanil exerted the least suppressive effects. Etomidate and midazolam did not suppress myogenic MEP, even at plasma concentrations sufficient for anesthesia. Ketamine induced moderate reduction of compound muscle action potential amplitudes only at high doses. Remifentanil and propofol administered via TCI systems allowed recording of myogenic potentials within a defined target plasma concentration range. CONCLUSIONS: Development of standardized total intravenous anesthesia/TCI protocols by using anesthetic agents such as propofol, remifentanil, ketamine, and midazolam, which have favorable pharmacokinetic and neurophysiological properties, will enhance the quality of intraoperative MEPs and promote the use of MEP monitoring as a useful tool to reduce surgery-related morbidity.     

Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgery

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Regional Trauma Center, Torino, Italy. OBJECTIVES: Complex spinal surgery carries a significant risk of neurological damage. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and applicability of multimodality motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgery in our institute. METHODS: Recordings of MEPs to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and cortical SEPs were made on 52 patients during spine and spinal cord surgery under propofol/fentanyl anaesthesia, without neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: Combined MEPs and SEPs monitoring was successful in 38/52 patients (73.1%), whereas only MEPs from at least one of the target muscles were obtained in 12 patients (23.1%); both MEPs and SEPs were absent in two (3.8%). Significant intraoperative-evoked potential changes occurred in one or both modalities in five (10%) patients. Transitory changes were noted in two patients, whereas three had persistent changes, associated with new deficits or a worsening of the pre-existing neurological disabilities. When no postoperative changes in MEP or MEP/SEP modalities occurred, it was predictive of the absence of new motor deficits in all cases. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative combined SEP and MEP monitoring is a safe, reliable and sensitive method to detect and reduce intraoperative injury to the spinal cord. Therefore, the authors suggest that a combination of SEP/MEP techniques could be used routinely during complex spine and/or spinal cord surgery.     

Response to double-burst appears before response to train-of-four stimulation during recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade

Background: Double-burst stimulation (DBS) it a relatively new nerve stimulation mode introduced for improved manual detection of residual neuromuscular blockade. Previous studies have shown that DBS_{3,3 50/50} (3 stimuli at 50 Hz followed 0.75 seconds later by 3 stimuli at 50 Hz) can detect deeper degrees of neuromuscular blockade than train-of-four (TOF) stimulation.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to examine if DBS_{3,3 80/40} (3 stimuli at 80 Hz followed 0.750 s later by 3 stimuli at 40 Hz) can detect even deeper degrees of neuromuscular blockade than DBS_{3,3 50/50} and to determine the time lapse from reappearance of response to each of the two DBS modes until reappearance of response to the TOF mode of nerve stimulation.
Methods: The study comprised 20 women undergoing gynaecological surgery and anaesthetised with fentanyl, thiopentone, halothane, and nitrous oxide. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored by using mechanomyography and stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Atracurium was used for neuromuscular blockade.
Results: Elapsed time from reappearance of response to DBS_{3,3 80/40} and DBS_{3,3 50/50} to reappearance of response to TOF stimulation was 459±196 (mean±SD) and 360±150 seconds, respectively, ( P <0.05).
Conclusions: DBS_{3,3 80/40} is capable of detecting deeper degrees of blockade than DBS_{3,3 50/50} which again is capable of detecting deeper degrees of blockade than TOF.