Retrospective evaluation of the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation after transplantation

Abstract: Numerous case reports describe patients with previously documented immunity developing active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after transplantation. However, the risk of reactivation of HBV under long‐term immunosuppression in hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)‐positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative transplant recipients has not been clearly described. Herein, we present a long‐term follow‐up for 49 HBcAb‐positive, HBsAg‐negative recipients (27 liver, 18 kidney, 4 pancreas) transplanted between June 1996 and April 2001. Among these, 37 recipients (76%) were HBsAb positive at transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of various antibody induction regimens in 20 (41%) of the recipients with either tacrolimus (33 [67%])‐ or cyclosporine (16 [33%])‐based maintenance immunosuppression. The incidence and duration of HBV prophylaxis was not significant. No patient received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) before or after transplantation. Additionally, only two patients received lamivudine, which was started post transplant without clinical indication. The mean length of follow‐up was 3.1±1.4 years. At the last follow‐up, overall patient and graft survival were 98% and 96%, respectively. Patient survival was 96% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 100% in pancreas transplant recipients. The graft survival for each organ type was 93% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 75% in pancreas transplant recipients at the end of follow‐up. There was no incidence of HBV reactivation defined as recurrence of HBsAg and/or HBV DNA positivity. These data suggest that the risk of reactivation of HBV in HBcAb‐positive, HBsAg‐negative transplant recipients under immunosuppression is negligible, regardless of immunosuppressive regimen, lamivudine prophylaxis, or HBsAb status. These patients should have access to transplantation as they enjoy excellent patient and graft survival rates.     

Acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus (HBV): the impact of underlying active HBV replication on persistence of HCV infection and antibody responses to HCV

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver donors with serological evidence of resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, anti-HBV core (HBc) positive) can transmit HBV infection to recipients. In the context of organ shortage, we investigated the efficacy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) to prevent HBV infection, and assessed the infectious risk by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for HBV DNA on serum and liver tissue of anti-HBc positive donors. PATIENTS: Between 1997 and 2000, 22 of 315 patients were transplanted with liver allografts from anti-HBc positive donors. Long term HBIG therapy was administered to 16 recipients. Four naive and two vaccinated patients received no prophylaxis. RESULTS: Hepatitis B developed in the four HBV naive recipients without prophylaxis and in none of the vaccinated subjects. Among the 16 recipients receiving HBIG, one patient with residual anti-HBs titres below 50 UI/ml became HBsAg positive. The remaining 15 remained HBsAg negative and HBV DNA negative by PCR testing throughout a 20 month (range 4-39) follow up period. HBV DNA was detected by PCR in 1/22 donor serum, and in 11/21 liver grafts with normal histology. A mean of 12 months post-transplantation (range 1-23) HBV DNA was no longer detectable in graft biopsies from patients remaining HBsAg negative. CONCLUSION: Anti-HBs antibodies may control HBV replication in liver grafts from anti-HBc positive donors, without additional antiviral drugs. These grafts are thus suitable either to effectively vaccinated recipients or to those who are given HBIG to prevent HBV recurrence.     

Course of a HBsAg positive liver transplantation in a hepatitis B and D virus coinfected recipient

The increasing demand for transplantation has led to consideration of liver grafts from donors exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV). Six transplantations of liver grafts from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive donors have been reported; two recipients suffered from HBV/HDV (hepatitis Delta virus) coinfection and were followed up for 10-12 months. Here, we report a 56 months follow-up of a HBV/HDV-coinfected recipient of a HBsAg positive liver graft. Posttransplant combination prophylaxis consisted of hepatitis immunoglobulin, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. HBsAg remained positive during stable posttransplant follow-up and subclinical HDV reinfection with low replication rate was detected at 1 month. Pegylated interferon therapy was introduced after documentation of histological evidence of mild chronic hepatitis, but without virological response after 48 weeks. Finally, antiviral treatment was switched to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. More than 50 months posttransplant the recipient revealed clinical symptoms of decompensated liver cirrhosis and has been relisted for liver transplantation. In conclusion HBsAg positive liver grafts in HBsAg positive recipients with HDV coinfection may result in virological recurrence and rapid development of liver cirrhosis.     

Favorable outcome of de novo hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation with lamivudine and adefovir therapy

Abstract: De novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) always progresses to chronic hepatitis because of the patients' immunocompromised status, and only a few then acquire hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion even with efficient antiviral therapy. Here we reported the case of a liver transplant recipient with de novo HBV infection who had a favorable outcome after lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) antiviral therapy. The patient received OLT because of end‐stage primary biliary cirrhosis and was found to have de novo HBV infection 3 months later. She was treated with LAM, and her serum HBV DNA turned undetectable 2 weeks later. However, serum HBV DNA turned detectable again after 9 months of LAM therapy and a YMDD mutation was detected. The addition of ADV was efficient to treat LAM‐resistant HBV. After 3 months of combination therapy, LAM was stopped and ADV monotherapy was continued. HBsAg seroconversion was achieved after an additional 12 months. The prevention and treatment of de novo HBV infection after OLT is discussed.     

Viral activity and outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive grafts in deceased liver transplantation

Indications of liver transplantation are extensive, but deceased donation does not meet the demand. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive grafts used to be discarded in the past. The aim of this study was to examine viral activity and outcome of HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts transplanted to HBsAg‐positive recipients. Eleven HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts were transplanted to HBsAg‐positive patients with acute liver failure (3 patients), hepatocellular carcinoma (6 patients) and repeatedly bleeding varices (2 patients). Postoperatively, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was treated by a combination of antiviral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues. HBV DNA and HBsAg were measured periodically. The median (interquartile) model of end‐stage liver disease score for the recipients was 19 (16‐32) with a range from 11 to 40. HBV DNA was detected in 6 patients with a range from 61 to 1083 IU/mL before transplantation. After transplantation, HBV DNA was detected in 4 patients in the first month and 2 patients in the 6th month and became undetectable for all patients at end of the first year. The quantitative HBsAg ranged from 0.86 to 241.1 IU/mL at 6 months and 0.34 to 238.5 IU/mL at 24 months (P = .135). Three of the patients died in the early phase, and the other patients were followed up for 40.0 ± 19.2 months with normal liver function. In conclusion, HBsAg‐positive deceased liver grafts function well with minimal viral activity under treatment of combined antiviral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues. Use of HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts is feasible and increases the donor pool to rescue dying patients.     

Indications for liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were not accepted for liver transplantation in Asia in the past because the hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) used to prevent post‐transplantation recurrence was very expensive and it was generally believed that Asians with hepatitis B fared worse than Caucasians after liver transplantation. The availability of lamivudine has altered the indication of liver transplantation for these patients. Twenty‐five Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection were given lamivudine as primary prophylaxis against HBV re‐infection before transplantation. Five patients died within 40 days of transplantation. After a median follow‐up period of 14 months (range, 5–39), 17 patients had lost serum HBsAg from 4 days to 27 months post transplantation, but it reappeared in three patients 4–12 months later. Antibody to HBsAg was detected periodically in the serum of 11 patients who had lost HBsAg. At the last follow‐up, six patients were HBsAg‐positive and HBV DNA was detected in only one of them. The indication for liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not as strict as for patients with chronic HBV infection because the long‐term survival is similar to that of non‐hepatitis C patients, even though re‐infection by HCV in the recipients is nearly universal. The main issue in the selection of patients with HCV for liver transplantation is therefore identification of criteria that can predict re‐infection and development of cirrhosis. These include factors such as multiple episodes of rejection, use of OKT3, pre‐transplant viral load and genotype, but reports are not consistent and so there are no well‐defined selection criteria. The selection criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are now well defined. Many studies have confirmed that a tumour > 5 cm, and showing vascular invasion, and poor differentiation adversely affects survival. In practice, only patients with a tumour < 5 cm and Child’s C cirrhosis are accepted for liver transplantation. Transarterial oily chemoembolization and intralesional alcohol injection are used to control or down‐stage the tumour while patients wait for a cadaveric liver graft.     

唐山地区乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系研究

目的:研究唐山地区乙型肝炎(乙肝)患者乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)滴度、乙肝病毒基因(HBV DNA)水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系。方法:选择2018年1月—2020年12月唐山地区150例乙肝患者作为研究对象,测定HBsAg滴度和血清HBV DNA水平,通过基因测序分析突变情况,并据此分为突变组与未突变组,比较不同基因突变位点患者的HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平,使用线性回归分析唐山地区乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平与乙肝基因突变位点的关系。结果:本研究150例乙肝患者中,有62例患者发生了基因突变,基因突变发生率为41.33%(62/150)。其中,rtM204I/V位点基因突变占比最高,为27.42%(17/62),rtL180M次之,为22.58%(14/62);rtL180M+rtM204I/V、rtA181T+rtN236T基因突变患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平高于rtM204I/V、rtL180M、rtN236T基因突变患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经Pearson相关性分析结果显示,基因突变乙肝患者HBsAg滴度、HBV DNA水平...     

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen,hepatitis B e‐antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon‐α‐2b therapy in hepatitis B e‐antigen‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy. Methods: Thirty HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α‐2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis. Results: VR at 48 weeks post‐treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non‐responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log₁₀ HBsAg and log₁₀ HBeAg correlated well with those of log₁₀ cccDNA and log₁₀ total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log₁₀ sample to cut‐off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.     

Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor graft using hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic grafts from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and anti-core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors have been shown to transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Recently, it has been reported that combined hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine therapy is effective in the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In this report, we assessed the efficacy of combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy in preventing HBV transmission by graft with HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: We studied 22 patients who had undergone LDLT with allografts from HBcAb-positive living donors at Gunma University Hospital and Kyushu University Hospital. Long-term combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy were administrated to all recipients. Serum samples from the donor and recipient were tested for HBcAb, HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antibody. Liver biopsies from grafts were tested for HBV DNA. RESULTS: All recipients were HBcAb negative before LDLT. All of the donor livers were HBV DNA positive at the time of LDLT. All of the recipients had HBsAb titers greater than 300 mIU/ml 4 weeks after LDLT, and remained 100 mIU/ml thereafter. None of the recipients have become infected with HBV with a follow-up of 25-86 months. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy can prevent HBV infection in recipients who receive liver grafts from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only

T. Karlas, J. Hartmann, A. Weimann, M. Maier, M. Bartels, S. Jonas, J. Mössner, T. Berg, H.L. Tillmann, J. Wiegand. Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only.
Transpl Infect Dis 2011: 13: 299–302. All rights reserved Abstract: Combination therapy with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has become the standard treatment for prevention of post‐liver transplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, HBIg therapy is inconvenient and expensive. Alternative therapeutic approaches with modern nucleos(t)ide analogues are limited so far. The present case report describes prevention of HBV recurrence with entecavir and tenofovir. A 48‐year‐old male patient with hepatitis B‐induced decompensated liver cirrhosis initially improved on lamivudine (LAM) until LAM resistance (rtL180M and rtM204V) emerged followed by renewed decompensation. Therefore, tenofovir was added to LAM leading to undetectable HBV DNA (<200 copies/mL). Six months later, low‐level viremia (479 copies/mL) was detected. Treatment was escalated to tenofovir plus entecavir. HBV DNA became negative again, and the patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. HBIg was administered during transplantation (10,000 IU) and on the second and third postoperative days (total dose 26,000 IU). Subsequently, the anti‐hepatitis B surface (HBs) titer rose to 1477 IU/L at day 4 post transplantation. Although HBIg should have been continued, the patient remained on combination therapy with tenofovir plus entecavir only. The anti‐HBs titer decreased and became negative 4 months later. However, under continued combination therapy with oral antivirals, HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen remained negative during the entire follow‐up of 21 months after liver transplantation. Combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir may prevent post‐liver transplant hepatitis B recurrence even without HBIg maintenance therapy. This case illustrates that combination oral antiviral therapy might substitute for HBIg as indefinite prophylactic regimen due to profound antiviral efficacy and low risk of viral resistance. Efficacy and safety must be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with autoimmune liver diseases

Background: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is characterized by undetectable serum HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) but detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or liver. Aims: To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of occult HBV in autoimmune liver diseases as similar data are missing. Methods: One hundred and ninety‐six sera samples from HBsAg‐negative patients, including 66 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), 93 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 37 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), were investigated for HBV‐DNA using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before treatment initiation. One hundred and three serial samples from 38 AIH patients under immunosuppression and 282 selected blood donors (HBsAg negative; antibodies to HBV‐core antigen positive) were also investigated. Fourteen available paraffin‐embedded AIH liver samples were also investigated for HBV‐DNA by nested‐PCR. Results: Hepatitis B virus DNA was detected in the serum of 24/196 patients (12.2%) and 0/282 donors (P=0.0000). Nine patients had AIH (13.6%), eight had PBC (8.6%) and seven had PSC (18.9%) (P=0.0000 vs healthy). HBV‐DNA detection in AIH livers was higher than in serum. HBV‐DNA was associated neither with HBV markers nor with epidemiological, laboratory and clinical data. Serial testing of AIH patients revealed two HBV‐DNA‐negative patients before treatment becoming positive during treatment, while all HBV‐DNA‐positive patients before immunosuppression became negative. Conclusion: Based mainly on serum HBV‐DNA, we found a significant proportion of autoimmune liver disease patients with occult HBV compared with donors. However, taking into account our results in a small number of liver tissues, it should be emphasized that occult HBV could be even higher when both serum and liver specimens are investigated. Occult HBV does not seem to affect the clinical and laboratory features of the diseases, while AIH patients with occult HBV under immunosuppression do not deteriorate during follow‐up.     

Loss of HBsAg antigen during treatment with entecavir or lamivudine in nucleoside‐naïve HBeAg‐positive patients with chronic hepatitis B*

Summary. This retrospective analysis was conducted to describe the characteristics of nucleoside‐naïve hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive patients with chronic hepatitis B, who achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss during entecavir or lamivudine therapy. HBeAg‐positive adults with chronic hepatitis B, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase, and compensated liver disease were randomized to double‐blind treatment for up to 96 weeks with entecavir 0.5 mg/day or lamivudine 100 mg/day. HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were measured at regular intervals during and off‐treatment follow‐up. Through a maximum duration of 96 weeks on‐treatment and 24 weeks off‐treatment, HBsAg loss was confirmed in 18/354 (5.1%) patients treated with entecavir and 10/355 (2.8%) patients treated with lamivudine. Among the 28 patients with confirmed HBsAg loss, 27 (96%) achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/mL, and 27 (96%) achieved confirmed HBeAg loss. All entecavir recipients with HBsAg loss had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL. Caucasian patients, and those infected with HBV genotype A or D, were significantly more likely to lose HBsAg. This retrospective analysis of data from a randomized, global phase three trial shows that confirmed loss of HBsAg occurred in 5% of nucleoside‐naïve HBeAg‐positive patients treated with entecavir, and that HBsAg loss is associated with sustained off‐treatment suppression of HBV DNA.     

乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性供肝在肝移植中的应用

目的 探讨HBsAg阳性供肝在成人肝移植中应用的安全性及其对患者预后的影响.方法 回顾性分析本中心2007年1月至2010年2月23例接受HBsAg阳性供肝的成人肝移植患者临床资料,患者全部为男性,中位年龄42.5岁(29 ～ 61岁),原发病均为乙型肝炎相关终末期肝病,其中13例术前HBsAg、HBeAg和抗-HBc为阳性,10例术前HBsAg、抗-HBe和抗-HBc为阳性.供体HBsAg均为阳性,术后口服恩替卡韦0.5mg,1次/d,静脉滴注乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG),术后1周每天滴注2000 IU.术中及术后采用无激素的免疫抑制方案,术后第1、7、14、21、30天检测患者血清HBsAg、抗-HBs、HBeAg、抗-HBe、抗-HBc、HBV DNA水平,并行肝脏彩色多普勒超声检查.1个月后每月检测及检查1次,并记录患者术后肝功能、肾功能、急性排斥反应、感染、血管并发症、胆道并发症、乙型肝炎复发、肿瘤复发及患者生存等数据.结果 围手术期2例患者死于严重肺部感染,其余21例患者随访至2010年12月(10 ～ 38个月),所有患者术后乙型肝炎未转阴,其中1例患者于术后5个月因胆道缺血再次行肝移植,3例肿瘤患者分别于术后9、14、18个月死于肿瘤复发,18例患者生存,肝功能良好,彩色多普勒超声监测显示肝脏形态、质地良好,HBV DNA监测显示其均为阴性.随访期内,23例患者的生存率为78.3％(18/23),移植肝生存率为73.9％(17/23),未出现乙型肝炎复发所致的肝功能异常、移植肝丢失和病死患者.结论 HBsAg阳性供肝可以安全地应用于乙型肝炎相关终末期肝病的患者.     

Randomized trial of lamivudine versus hepatitis B immunoglobulin for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation requires further optimization. In a randomized trial we investigated a regimen where the initially given hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) is replaced by long-term lamivudine treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four liver transplant recipients (all HBsAg-positive/HBV DNA-negative before transplantation), who had received HBIg for at least 6 months without HBV recurrence, were randomized to receive lamivudine (n = 12) or HBIg (n = 12) for 52 weeks. The efficacy criteria involved seronegativity for HBsAg and undetectable HBsAg/ HBcAg in the liver. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 24 patients completed the study without hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence (11 on HBIg, ten on lamivudine), while three patients became HBsAg-positive. Amongst those without HBV recurrence HBV DNA was detectable only by polymerase chain reaction, intermittently in serum and lymphocytes, and in liver specimens from six of eight patients receiving HBIg and five of seven receiving lamivudine. YMDD variant was found in four cases with no viral antigen expression. Eight patients continued lamivudine after the study and during an additional 6-22 months remained HBsAg-negative with normal graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of HBIg with lamivudine is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence in low-risk liver transplant recipients and offers a convenient and cost-effective alternative for long-term HBV prophylaxis.     

Lamivudine therapy of chronic hepatitis B in three groups of patients: non transplanted patients, liver recipients, and kidney recipients

OBJECTIVE: As conflicting results have been observed by some authors in liver recipients, the aim of the study was to evaluate lamivudine therapy in 3 groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B: non-transplanted patients, liver and kidney recipients.METHODS: All patients were studied for clinical symptoms, hepatic enzymes, hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology, serum HBV DNA load, and HBV polymerase genotype (mutations associated with lamivudine resistance).RESULTS: During the 48-144 week-long follow-up (mean: 75 weeks), 23 non-transplanted patients, 5 liver and 6 kidney recipients were studied. A sustained biochemical and virological response was obtained in 19 out of the 23 non-transplanted patients and in 4 of 6 kidney recipients, while the 5 liver recipients did not respond. After the development of lamivudine resistance, mutations rtM204V and rtL180M were detected in all studied patients, mutation rtM207I in one, with similar results from traditional nucleotide sequencing and a commercial line probe assay.CONCLUSION: The poor response to lamivudine in liver recipients requires further studies.     

Donor derived hepatitis B virus infection: Analysis of the Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted from organ donor to recipient, but details of transmission events are not widely published. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) evaluated 105 cases of potential donor derived transmission events of HBV between 2009‐2017. Proven, probable or possible transmission of HBV occurred in 25 (23.8%) cases. Recipients of liver grafts were most commonly infected (20 of 21 exposed recipients) compared to 9 of 21 exposed non‐hepatic recipients. Eleven of 25 donors were HBV core antibody (HBcAb) positive/HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and infected 8/20 recipients. Of the 10 liver recipients and 1 liver‐kidney recipient who received organs from these donors: six were not given antiviral prophylaxis, two developed infection after antiviral prophylaxis was discontinued, two developed HBV while on lamivudine prophylaxis, one was on antiviral prophylaxis and did not develop HBV viremia or antigenemia. One recipient of a HBcAb positive/HBsAg negative kidney developed active HBV infection. Unexpected donor‐derived transmission of HBV was a rare event in reports to DTAC, but was often detected in the recipient late post‐transplant. Six of 11 recipients (54.5%) of a liver from a HBcAb positive donor did not receive prophylaxis; all of these were potentially preventable with the use of anti‐viral prophylaxis.     

Reverse seroconversion of hepatitis B virus infectious status after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from a carrier donor.

A 35-year-old man with acute promyelocytic leukemia received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) in second complete remission. The donor was his 18-year-old brother, a chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier with detectable serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA). Before BMT, the recipient was immune to HBV, with serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs), antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe) and normal liver function. Examination of the recipient serum drawn 2 months after BMT revealed reverse seroconversion from anti-HBs/anti-HBe to HBsAg/HBeAg, which remained positive thereafter. Upon reducing cyclosporin 6 months after BMT, acute hepatitis occurred with HBV DNA in serum as evidence of active HBV replication; the patient then developed chronic hepatitis which progressed to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation within 8 months. Transfusion of HBV DNA/HBeAg-positive bone marrow is thus harmful even when the recipient has anti-HBs prior to BMT.     

Preoperative serum levels of wild-type and hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) and graft infection after liver transplantation for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Allograft infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing liver transplant (OLT) is still significant, despite post-transplant prophylaxis with high doses of immunoglobulin to HBsAg. Baseline status and post-OLT levels of viraemia and wild-type and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) were correlated with the clinical course of 16 consecutive HBsAg carriers, positive for hepatitis B e antibody, with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent OLT and received permanent post-OLT prophylaxis with antibody to HBsAg (HBsAb). Fourteen patients had less than 10³ HBV genome equivalentsml^–1 (eqml^–1) at baseline and remained HBV free after a median of 36 months following OLT. Two patients with mean pre-OLT viraemia higher than 10⁵ genome eqml^–1 and prevalent HBeAg-negative HBV viraemia before OLT suffered a severe graft hepatitis. Interferon-α2b (3MUm^–2 per day) was able to reduce viraemia in both patients and to revert the clinical course of the infection in one, who remained infection-free 22 months after IFN treatment. Fourteen patients had less than 10³ HBV genomeeqml^–1 at baseline and remained HBV free, after a median of 36 months following OLT, with permanent HBsAb immunoprophylaxis. These observations suggest that the quantitative analysis of HBV pre-OLT viraemia levels may provide a very useful tool for predicting the ideal time of liver replacement. Clinical trials on the use of antiviral drugs capable of inhibiting HBV serum levels before liver transplantation should be pursued on this premise.     

Hepatitis B virus blood screening: impact of nucleic amplification technology testing implementation on identifying hepatitis B surface antigen non-reactive window period and chronic infections

Background Despite improvements in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test sensitivity, post‐transfusion hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection still occurs because HBsAg is undetectable during the early window phase (WP) of the infection, in the convalescence core window phase of the infection, or in serologically silent chronic hepatitis or in mutant forms of HBV. HBV‐DNA screening using high sensitivity nucleic amplification technology (NAT) assays has recently been introduced to reduce the residual risk of transmission of HBV by transfusion of blood components. Materials Over 1 year 75 063 donations were individually screened for HBV‐DNA by the Ultrio Procleix assay on the Tigris platform. The donations were collected in the Latium region, an area of the central Italy, and they accounted for the 40% of the total blood units collected in this area per year. The initial reactive samples were re‐tested and confirmed by the discriminatory HBV assay. Additional HBV serological markers were also performed. Suspected WP infections were followed‐up to monitor the development of the immune response. All HBV‐DNA‐positive donors were called back to check up their infectious status. Results The results of testing the 75 063 donations are: 33 donations HBsAg positive, 31 out of them HBV‐DNA‐positive and two HBV‐DNA negative; 22 donations HBsAg‐negative but HBV‐DNA positive with low viral load. Six of the 22 were found to be consistently HBV‐DNA reactive whereas the remaining 16 donations showed inconsistent results on multiple NAT retesting. One WP infection was confirmed by the follow‐up of the donor for 3 months following the index blood donation. Conclusions In the donor population of the Latium region, NAT screening has revealed a higher than expected number of donors who were HBsAg non‐reactive but HBV‐DNA‐positive with three donors showing HBV‐DNA as the only marker of infection. The adoption of genome screening has increased the safety of the blood supply and has also contributed to the protection of donor health by identifying either WP or clinically silent infections.     

Pitfall of hepatitis B surface antigen testing in a kidney transplant recipient presenting hepatitis B reactivation

Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) detection can be hampered in the setting of HBV reactivation in immunocompromized patients with prior serology indicating past cured infection, and can be associated with severe or fulminant and fatal hepatitis. We present a case of HBV reactivation in a renal transplant patient in whom HBsAg failed to be confirmed as a true positive result. One year after transplantation, systematic testing showed HBsAg positivity with a titer at 244 pg/mL, anti-hepatitis B core antibody and concurrent anti-hepatitis B surface antibody positivity. Confirmation of HBsAg detection by seroneutralization did not confirm HBsAg positivity, indicating that HBsAg detection was a false positive result. Notwithstanding, HBV DNA titer in serum was concurrently 8.6 Log IU/mL. HBV DNA sequencing showed a genotype D and several amino acid substitutions within HBsAg, including some previously involved in impaired diagnosis and altered immunogenicity. Although no perturbation of liver biochemical markers was observed, treatment with tenofovir was introduced. One month later, HBV DNA level had decreased by 2.6 Log IU/mL and no clinical and biochemical symptoms of hepatitis had occurred. The present case underlines that serologic diagnosis of HBV reactivation can be tricky in transplant recipients with a prior serology indicating past HBV infection. This prompts to perform HBV DNA testing in case of positive HBsAg testing, regardless of the result of neutralization by anti-HBs antibodies.