带锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定治疗肱骨干骨折的随机对比研究

目的前瞻性对比研究带锁髓内钉和带锁加压钢板(LCP)治疗肱骨干骨折的临床效果。方法随机将49例分成两组(髓内钉28例;LCP组21例)。患者全部为新鲜肱骨干骨折,骨折部位距肱骨外科颈至少3cm,距尺骨鹰嘴大于5cm。临床疗效评价包括手术时间、出血量、骨折愈合情况、桡神经恢复、感染和肘关节、肩关节不适症状,影像学评价包括骨折力线、愈合时间、延长愈合和不愈合的发生率。结果平均随访1.5年。LCP组19例(90.5)骨折在16周后愈合,髓内钉组24例(85.7)在16周后愈合(P=0.70)。肩关节疼痛和肩关节活动受限在髓内钉组发生明显(P<0.05),而LCP组未发现这种情况。LCP组肘关节的活动范围明显减少(P<0.05),尤其是肱骨干远端1/3骨折患者。两组总并发症发生率比较无明显差异。结论对于需要手术治疗的肱骨干骨折,髓内钉和LCP都能使骨折稳定以达到最终愈合。     

Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing

Plate and screw fixation (PSF) has always been the more common surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures. However, intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the humerus has gained in popularity over the last two decades. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of midshaft humeral fractures. The study included 91 patients treated at the department of Trauma Surgery of the University hospital of Leuven; 42 fractures had been treated by plate fixation and 49 by IM nailing. Union, functional outcome, possible complications and the need for additional surgery were compared between the IMN and PSF group. No significant difference in terms of fracture union and functional recovery was noted between the two groups. There were four cases of postoperative radial nerve palsy in the PSF group, versus two in the IMN group (non significant difference). A significantly larger number of patients with restrictive pain and/or functional hindrance in the shoulder or elbow was noted in the IMN group (p = 0.0053). Problems with osteosynthesis material occurred as often in the PSF group as in the IMN group. One patient developed wound infection at the shoulder after antegrade nailing. A significantly larger number of complications was seen in the IMN group than in the PSF group (p = 0.05). A reoperation was necessary in 143% of the PSF patients and 163% of the IMN patients (non significant difference). In this retrospective study, IMN did not achieve better results than PSF of humeral midshaft fractures and was associated with more postoperative complications. Based on these findings, we suggest that plating of humeral shaft fractures should be considered as the primary treatment for all surgical indications, except for some open fractures requiring temporary external fixation, pathological fractures, humeral shaft fractures in morbidly obese and osteopenic patients, and large segmental fractures of the humerus.     

肱骨干骨折顺行与逆行髓内针固定的病例 对照研究

目的：比较肱骨干骨折顺行与逆行髓内针固定的疗效。方法：入选1999年3月至2006年10月间有完整随访资料的肱骨干骨折105例,分为顺行髓内针组（A组）82例,逆行髓内针组（B组）23例。对两组的手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant—Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等指标进行比较。结果：随访时间平均（31．2±20．9）个月。两组的手术时间、骨折愈合时间、愈合率及并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。B组术中出血量大于A组（P=0．002）。A组有4例（4．9％）不愈合,8例（9．8％）发生肩痛伴肩关节活动度减小,B组3例（13．0％）术中发生医源性骨折。A组肩关节功能评分低于B组（P=0．04）,肘关节功能评分两组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：顺行与逆行髓内针固定均是治疗肱骨干骨折的有效方法,但逆行髓内针固定医源性骨折发生率较高,应正确选择和制备髓内针入点。顺行髓内针固定有较高的肩痛和肩关节活动度减小的并发症发生率,注意将髓内针尾埋于肩袖下方,细致保护和修复肩袖,术后进行合理的康复练习,有利于减少肩痛和改善肩关节功能。     

Functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: comparison between retrograde Marchetti-Vicenzi and unreamed AO antegrade nailing.

BACKGROUND: We compared anesthesia time, complications, fracture healing, as well as shoulder and elbow function after retrograde and antegrade nailing of humeral shaft fractures or impending fractures. METHODS: Thirty retrograde Marchetti-Vicenzi nails (MVN) and 22 antegrade locked AO unreamed humeral nails (AO-UHN) were inserted in 52 patients. Forty-three fractures were followed up until healing, and three required reoperation for nonunion (two MVN, one AO-UHN). Nineteen MVN and 17 AO-UHN patients were evaluated according to Constant's shoulder score and HSS elbow score after an average of 2 years (0.5-3.4 years). RESULTS: Anesthesia time did not differ significantly in both groups. Differences in Constant's shoulder score between healthy and affected side were more important in the AO-UHN group due to limitation in ROM and loss of abduction power. Differences in HSS elbow score were similar in both groups, although four supracondylar fractures occurred in the MVN group. CONCLUSION: The retrograde approach to the humeral medullary cavity using a MVN resulted in better shoulder function and similar elbow function compared with the antegrade approach using an AO-UHN.     

Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: a comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixation.

Introduction Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing of humeral shaft fractures is reported to cause shoulder joint impairment. This retrospective study compared shoulder joint symptoms, range of motion (ROM), and isometric strength after antegrade IM nailing and dynamic compression (DC) plating of humeral shaft fractures.Materials and methods We compared 29 patients with DC plating and 44 with antegrade IM nailing of their humeral shaft fractures. Shoulder pain, LInsalata and Constant scores, shoulder joint ROM and isometric shoulder strengths were measured after mean follow-up of 6.2 (1–15) years (DC plating) and 5.5 (2–10) years (IM nailing).Results Patients had nonsignificantly more shoulder pain after IM nailing than after DC plating. Shoulder scores and isometric strength measurements showed no difference between the groups. Flexion was significantly better after DC plating, but none of the other ROM parameters differed between the groups. The shoulder scores and all ROM and strength parameters of the injured side were significantly lower than on the uninjured side in both groups.Conclusions Shoulder joint ROM and strength does not recover to normal after humeral shaft fracture. Antegrade IM nailing if performed properly is not responsible for shoulder joint impairment.     

Modified tibial nails for treating distal tibia fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical consequences of cutting one centimeter off the tip of a tibial nail when treating distal tibia fractures with intramedullary nails. DESIGN: Randomized laboratory investigation using matched pairs of cadaveric tibias with osteotomies made to resemble distal tibia fractures extending to four and five centimeters from the tibiotalar joints. INTERVENTION: The smaller (four-centimeter) distal tibias were stabilized using ten-millimeter diameter tibial nails that had been modified by removing the distal one centimeter of the nail. The five-centimeter distal tibias were stabilized with standard ten-millimeter diameter tibial nails. Each tibia was tested in elastic compression, rotation, and compression-bending on a servohydraulic materials testing machine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Stiffness was calculated for each type of loading to compare stability of the modified nail construct to that of the standard nail construct. RESULTS: Four-centimeter distal tibia fragments stabilized with modified nails have comparable stiffness in compression and in torsion to five-centimeter distal tibia fragments stabilized with standard tibial nails. The stiffness in compression-bending was surprisingly low in both groups and differed by only 3.7 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of one centimeter from the tip of a tibial nail allows placement of two distal interlocking screws in tibial fractures located four centimeters from the tibiotalar joint. The fixation strength achieved is comparable to that of standard intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures located five centimeters from the tibiotalar joint using two distal interlocking screws. Fixation strength with these distal fractures, however, is not strong enough to resist moderate compression-bending loads. Thus, patients with distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing must follow weight-bearing restrictions until significant fracture healing occurs to prevent coronal plane malalignment of the fracture.     

Clinical performance of a new medullary humeral nail: antegrade versus retrograde insertion.

OBJECTIVE: A new intramedullary nail system for humeral shaft fractures is evaluated to determine whether retrograde nailing is as reliable as antegrade nailing. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter nonrandomized clinical study. PATIENTS: Eighty-four patients with acute humeral shaft fractures were nailed with the new unreamed humeral nail (UHN) system. Fifty-seven nails were introduced retrogradely, and twenty-seven antegradely. Bone healing and functional outcome were the follow-up parameters. RESULTS: The ratio of perioperative complications was equivalent for both groups, but one shaft fracture and three fractures or fissures at the entry point occurred in the group with retrograde nail insertion. Five fractures, all with retrograde nail insertion, needed secondary surgery to achieve bony healing. There was no difference in functional outcome after healing in either group. CONCLUSION: Retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures is technically more demanding than antegrade nailing. Fractures or fissures at the insertion point must be avoided by adequate preparation of the entry hole and careful nail insertion. Bone healing problems seem more surgeon-related than approach-related. As in every other procedure, an optimal fracture configuration and high fracture stability must be achieved.     

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for metastatic pathologic humeral fractures

Because patients with metastatic bone disease may survive only 3 to 12 months, the goal of surgery for pathologic fractures is to attain rigid and durable internal fixation and immediate postoperative use of the upper extremity. Surgical options such as intramedullary nailing, plating, and insertion of prosthesis usually reinforced with bone cement have been proposed for pathological humeral fractures. We describe a 42-year-old man with a pathologic distal humeral fracture. The fracture location and lack of distal bone stock precluded the use of intramedullary nails. We performed minimally invasive plating by using a locking plate for bridging and stabilization of fracture. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the humeral shaft was developed to allow anterior plate and screw stabilization involving less soft tissue disruption and to theoretically improve healing rates and reduce complications, such as infection and iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Plain radiographs showed stable consolidation of the fracture without screw loosening at the 7-month follow-up. Elbow range of motion was 120°, and the arm was stable without pain. Minimally invasive plate using a locking plate can provide stable fixation and allow early arm mobilization without protection and decrease the risk of operation-related complications, making it a useful surgical alternative in the treatment of pathologic humeral fractures.     

Locked intramedullary nailing for difficult nonunions of the humeral diaphysis

Antegrade intramedullary nailing and bone grafting was carried out for 27 patients with resistant atrophic nonunion of the humeral diaphysis. The initial fracture was open in 12 cases and closed in 15. There were ten proximal humeral fractures, 13 mid-shaft fractures and four distal humeral shaft fractures. Most had previous attempts at internal fixation with bone grafting. Fifteen cases united, but 12 remained ununited necessitating further surgical treatment. The failures were all in the more complex cases. Lack of rigidity and compression may be the problem.     

Treatment of humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions with humeral locked nails

OBJECTIVE: To report experience with use of humeral locked nails in treating humeral delayed unions and nonunions. The following techniques yielded encouragingly good results: static locking, short-to-long segment nailing, bone grafting, fracture compression, and minimal surgical trauma. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 41 consecutive patients with 13 delayed unions and 28 nonunions were treated with humeral locked nails. Delay from trauma to surgery averaged 4.2 months for delayed union and 15.5 months for nonunion. The average age of patients was 50.2 years; average follow-up time was 23.2 months. There were 7 proximal-third fractures, 21 middle-third fractures, and 13 distal-third fractures. The antegrade approach was used for 13 fractures and retrograde for 28. Open nailing was performed in 39 fractures and closed nailing in 2. If the fracture motion was still present after nail insertion, axial compression of the fracture site was specially applied. Bone grafting was performed in the fractures with open nailing. Thirty-four fractures were nailed with 8-mm nails, and 7 fractures were nailed with 7-mm nails. RESULTS: With a single operation, all but two patients achieved osseous union in, on average, 5.6 months. One of these two patients eventually gained union after another surgery with fracture compression along the original nail and concurrent bone grafting. The second patient, undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal failure, had persistent nonunion. At follow-up, for patients with antegrade nailing, all but four patients had less than 20 degrees limitation of shoulder abduction. For patients with retrograde nailing, all but two had less than 10 degrees limitation of elbow motion. Only the patient with persistent nonunion had continual pain and significant impairment of arm function. CONCLUSIONS: Humeral locked nailing seems to be effective for humeral delayed unions or nonunions. It may be an acceptable alternative for fractures unsuited for plate fixation, such as those with comminution, osteoporosis, or a severely adhered radial nerve.     

The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures

Fractures of the humeral shaft comprise 1% to 3% of all fractures. Incidence rates reveal a bimodal distribution in which there is one small peak during adolescence, followed by a larger spike during the fifth and sixth decades of life. Most humeral diaphysis fractures are simple patterns of the mid-diaphysis. This article emphasizes surgical approaches to humeral fractures, providing a review of the surgical spectrum of treatment inclusive of intramedullary nailing and plating, but also includes a brief discussion of the conservative approach.     

交锁髓内钉手术治疗肱骨干骨折

目的介绍采用交锁髓内钉手术治疗肱骨干骨折。方法自1999年1月～2003年1月采用交锁髓内钉(远端不交锁)治疗肱骨干骨折36例。男28例，女8例；年龄19～59岁，平均38岁。AO分型，A型24例，B型11例，C型1例，均采用闭合复位、顺行插钉技术，远端不交锁，术后第2天肩肘带保护下开始功能锻炼，不采用其它外固定。结果随访26例，随访时间3～38个月，平均20个月，所有病例伤口Ⅰ／甲愈合，骨折无延迟愈合及不愈合。平均愈合时间9周，术后肩肘关节功能恢复良好。结论交锁髓内钉是治疗肱骨干骨折较好方法，远端可不交锁。     

Prospective randomized study of reamed versus unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing: an assessment of procedures

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the procedure of unreamed femoral nailing is simpler, faster, and safer than reamed femoral intramedullary nailing. DESIGN: Prospective randomized. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred femoral shaft fractures without significant concomitant injuries admitted to an academic Level 1 urban trauma center. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture using a reamed or unreamed technique. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The surgical time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: One hundred patients with 100 femoral shaft fractures were correctly prospectively randomized to the study. Thirty-seven patients received reamed and sixty-three patients received unreamed nails. All nails were interlocked proximally and distally. The average surgical time for the reamed nail group was 138 minutes and for unreamed nail group was 108 minutes (p = 0.012). The estimated blood loss for the reamed nail group was 278 milliliters and for the unreamed nail group 186 milliliters (p = 0.034). Reamed intramedullary nailing required an average of 4.72 minutes, whereas unreamed nailing required 4.29 minutes of fluoroscopy time. Seven perioperative complications occurred in the reamed nail group and eighteen in the unreamed nail group. Two patients in the unreamed group required an early secondary procedure. Iatrogenic comminution of the fracture site occurred during three reamed and six unreamed intramedullary nailings. Reaming of the canal was required before the successful placement of three nails in the unreamed group because of canal/nail diameter mismatch. CONCLUSIONS: Unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing involves fewer steps and is significantly faster with less intraoperative blood loss than reamed intramedullary nailing. The unreamed technique, however, was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5).     

逆行穿带锁髓内针治疗新鲜肱骨干骨折

目的 总结使用逆行穿带锁髓内针治疗肱骨干骨折的临床经验以提高肱骨干骨折的治疗水平。方法 1999年2月－2000年6月使用逆行穿带锁髓内针的方法治疗肱骨干新鲜骨折32例,骨折均为闭合型,手术采用从鹰嘴窝上向近端逆行穿针法。结果 32例3个月时全部骨性愈合,肩肘关节活动恢复95％以上。1例出现术后桡神经麻痹。结论 逆行穿针避免了对肩袖的干扰,髓内针能有效地稳定骨折,软组织进一步破坏小,肩肘关节功能恢复快。     

Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children: are elastic stable intramedullary nails an improvement over external fixation?

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children requires implants that do not violate open physes while maintaining tibial length and alignment. Both elastic stable intramedullary nails and external fixation can be utilized. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with these two techniques to determine if one is superior to the other. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the operative records and trauma registries of three institutions within our hospital system and identified thirty-five consecutive patients with open physes who had undergone operative treatment of a tibial fracture between April 1997 and June 2004. Four patients were excluded because they had been managed with locked intramedullary nails or with pins and plaster. Of the thirty-one remaining patients, sixteen had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nails and fifteen had been managed with unilateral external fixation. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. The functional outcomes were compared with use of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Complications related to treatment, such as malunion, delayed union, nonunion, infection, and the need for subsequent surgical treatment also were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with thirty-one operatively treated tibial fractures were available for evaluation. Fifteen patients had been managed with external fixation. Seven of these patients had a closed fracture, and eight had an open fracture. There were seven healing complications in this group, including two delayed unions, three nonunions, and two malunions. Sixteen patients had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Eleven patients had a closed fracture, and five had an open fracture. The mean time to union for the intramedullary nailing group (seven weeks) was significantly shorter than that for the external fixation group (eighteen weeks) (p < 0.01). The functional outcomes for the intramedullary nailing group were significantly better than those for the external fixation group in the categories of pain, happiness, sports, and global function (the mean of the mean scores of the first four categories) (p < 0.01 for these comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: When surgical stabilization of tibial fractures in children is indicated, we believe that the preferred method of fixation is with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.     

Komprimierte Marknagelung bei Oberarmschaftfrakturen

Since there is low fragment impaction in the case of transverse and short oblique fractures of the humerus, these involve an especially high risk of nonunion. The body weight exerts hardly any axial load on the human humerus, which in daily life is exposed much more to tension and rotational forces, requiring a high stabilization potency. This can be achieved by intramedullary nailing; interfragmentary compression, if appropriate, can augment its effects. A special compression device shifts the dynamic bolt at the nail base together with its bone fragment in the direction of the fracture gap, bringing about fragment adaptation followed by fragment compression and locking of the bolt. The result is then consolidated by means of an additional, static, bolt. Biomechanical studies have shown significantly higher stiffness values for compressed intramedullary nailing than for conventional nailing in cadaver humeri. Clinical results in 21 cases of compression nailing of the humeral shaft show complete bone healing in a median of 3.4 months with no necessity for revision surgery. There were no complications in these patients. In transverse fractures of the humeral shaft the use of interlocking nails with interfragmentary compression yields greater stability and thus a higher probability of undisturbed and fast bony healing.     

逆行置入交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折

目的　总结临床采用逆行置入交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折的经验。方法　采用 AO的专用钻头在鹰嘴窝上约 2 cm处钻孔 ,确定和准备进针入点 ,由肘向肩逆行置入 AO的非扩髓交锁髓内钉的方法治疗闭合性肱骨干骨折 15例。结果　 15例骨折在 3个月内全部骨性愈合 (8～ 12周 ) ,15例肩关节活动度于术后 3个月时已达正常对侧的 95 % ,肘关节活动度达正常的 85 %。有 2例病人肘关节活动度伸直较健侧相差 2 0°,拔钉后功能锻炼 1个月后恢复良好。结论　逆行置入交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折 ,避免了对肩袖的干扰 ,固定牢靠 ,肩肘关节功能恢复快 ,二期拆除内固定简便 ,是治疗肱骨干骨折的有效方法     

LCP钢板和带锁髓内钉治疗新鲜胫骨干骨折的对比研究

目的回顾性分析LCP钢板和带锁髓内钉两种方法治疗新鲜胫骨干骨折的效果。方法2003年10月～2006年4月,收治55例胫骨干新鲜骨折患者。其中男39例,女16例;年龄14～62岁,平均39岁。左侧27例,右侧31例,其中3例为双侧。34处骨折采用带锁髓内钉固定治疗(髓内钉组),24处骨折给予LCP钢板内固定治疗(LCP组)。髓内钉组和LCP组伤后至手术时间分别平均为3d和3.1d。评估两组患者手术时间、膝、踝关节活动度、骨折愈合时间以及术后并发症。结果术后获随访8～26个月,平均13个月。手术时间髓内钉组为84.0±9.2min,LCP组为69.0±8.4min;平均住院费髓内钉组为19297.78元,LCP组为14116.55元,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。髓内钉组膝关节屈曲为139.0±3.7°,LCP组为149.0±4.2°,伸直分别为4.0±0.7°和0±0.4°,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。髓内钉组、LCP组踝关节背屈分别为13.0±1.7°、10.0±1.4°,跖屈分别为41.0±2.6°、44.0±2.3°,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。骨折愈合时间LCP组略早,平均为3.1个月;髓内钉组平均为3.3个月。髓内钉组术后X线片示1例下肢短缩2.5cm,1例骨折延迟愈合,3例钉尾问题,1例旋转畸形(20°),6例膝前疼痛;LCP组1例开放骨折(AO分型为42B型)的患者术后1周发生感染,1例胫骨远端1/3骨折出现成角畸形。结论带锁髓内钉和LCP钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折均可取得理想效果。两种方法在膝关节和踝关节背屈度及跖屈度方面影响很小,都可保证骨折愈合。LCP钢板内固定并发症较少,且在手术时间和住院费用上更加有优势。     

Plating of femoral shaft fractures. A review of 15 cases

The objective of this study was to define the role, indications and outcome of plating in femur shaft fractures. All femoral shaft fractures admitted and treated by the authors during a 2-year period were analysed. The authors personally treated a total of 135 femur fractures. Of these 135 fractures, 15 (11%) were treated with primary plating. The femoral fractures were classified as grade I (n = 4), grade III (n = 3), grade IV (n = 4), grade V (n = 3), and grade VII (n = 1) (OTA classification). Three patients sustained open fractures (one grade I and two grade II, Gustilo and Anderson classification). Pelvic (6) or ipsilateral lower extremity injuries (4) occurred in 10 of the 15 patients. A total of 23 body areas were injured, most commonly the chest (n = 10), abdomen (n = 5), head (n = 6) and blood vessels (n = 3). There were no infections reported. Two implant failures were noted. Femur plating is a useful technique in polytrauma patients for specific indications where intramedullary nailing (IMN) may be contra-indicated or technically not feasible. Although the postoperative morbidity (ARDS, death) in our study seems to be lower after plating than after intramedullary nailing, the rate of complications of fracture healing (30%) is significantly greater with femur plating than with intramedullary nailing (12%).     

Comparison of compression plate and flexible intramedullary nail fixation in pediatric femoral shaft fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of compression plating and flexible intramedullary nailing for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Thirty-eight consecutive patients with 40 femoral shaft fractures were evaluated. Twenty-two femoral segments were treated with a compression plate and 18 femoral segments were treated with flexible intramedullary nailing. The time to healing, operation time and complications were evaluated. The average operation time was statistically significantly shorter in the nailing group (P=0.039). Four implant failures occurred in the compression plate group whereas one non-union was observed in the flexible nailing group. Flexible intramedullary nailing seems to provide a high union rate with a shorter operation time when compared with plate fixation.