解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并粗隆下骨折的体会

目的 探讨解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并粗隆下骨折的疗效.方法 采用解剖型锁定钢板治疗18例股骨粗隆间骨折合并粗隆下骨折.结果 本组随访12～24个月,所有骨折均愈合,愈合时间为2～8个月.根据黄公怡临床评定标准:优12例,良5例,差1例.结论 应用解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并粗隆下骨折具有简单实用,安全有效,创伤小,内固定牢固,能早期活动和负重的优点,是一种较好的方法.     

解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折的效果观察

目的探讨解剖型锁定钢板内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折的临床效果。方法对44例股骨粗隆间伴粗隆下骨折患者行近端解剖型锁定钢板内固定术治疗,对患者进行12~36个月随访,观察治疗效果和并发症发生情况。结果本组骨折愈合优:28例,良:14例,差:2例,优良率95.5%。未发生感染、股骨头坏死及断钉和断板等并发症。结论早期采用解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折,远期疗效良好。     

股骨近端解剖型钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨股骨近端解剖型钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法自2000年1月至2005年1月，采用切开复位，股骨近端解剖型钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折36例，根据术前、术后X线片及术后髋关节功能恢复情况评价内固定效果。结果术后随访6个月～3年，平均18个月，所有病例均在术后3～5．5个月获得骨性愈合，髋关节功能根据Harris评分标准进行评定，优32例，良4例。结论股骨近端解剖型钢板适用于治疗大多数类型的股骨粗隆间骨折，能达到良好的骨折复位和坚强的固定，促进关节早期功能锻炼，骨折愈合率高，是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的理想选择。     

解剖锁定钢板结合MIPPO技术治疗粉碎性低位股骨粗隆下骨折

[目的]探讨解剖锁定钢板结合MIPPO技术治疗粉碎性低位股骨粗隆下骨折(LSFF)的手术方法及临床疗效.[方法]2006年5月～2011年8月,采用股骨近端解剖锁定钢板结合MIPPO技术治疗粉碎性LSFF 40例.其中男23例,女17例;年龄20 ～ 75岁,平均44.8岁.按Seinsheimer标准分型并根据改良Harris标准进行疗效评定.[结果]随访时间为12 ～ 35个月(平均22.5个月),均获骨性愈合.改良Harris髋关节功能评分平均93.2分(83 ～ 100分),其中优31例,良9例.[结论]解剖锁定钢板结合MIPPO技术治疗粉碎性LSFF具有微创、固定可靠、骨折愈合率高等优点,允许早期髋关节不负重条件下功能锻炼从而获得理想治疗效果.     

股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗Russell—TaylorIIB型股骨粗隆下骨折的临床疗效

目的探讨股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗Russell—TaylorⅡB型股骨粗隆下骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2009—11—2012—12采用股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗的15例Russell—TaylorIIB型股骨粗隆下骨折。结果15例术后平均随访12（5—16）个月。术后3个月随访无内固定失败的患者,术后6个月采用髋关节功能Harris评分标准评价疗效：优10例,良4例,可1例,优良率93．3％。结论股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗Russell-TaylorIIB型股骨粗隆下骨折具有初始稳定性好,创伤相对小的优点。     

股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折42例

目的:探讨股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:对42例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,采用股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗。结果:随访6~24个月,骨折全部愈合,平均愈合时间为4~6个月。疗效按Harris髋关节功能评分,优20例,良19例,优良率93%。结论:股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板适合于各种类型的股骨粗隆间骨折,临床效果满意。     

股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折42例

目的:探讨股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效.方法:对42例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,采用股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗.结果:随访6~24个月,骨折全部愈合,平均愈合时间为4~6个月.疗效按Harris髋关节功能评分,优20例,良19例,优良率93%.结论:股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板适合于各种类型的股骨粗隆间骨折,临床效果满意.     

股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗高能量伤股骨粗隆下骨折

目的探讨股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗高能量伤股骨粗隆下骨折的临床疗效。方法采用股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗18例股骨粗隆下骨折。结果 18例均获随访11-30个月,平均(21±5.4)个月。骨折均骨性愈合,愈合时间4-9个月,平均(6±2.4)个月。髋关节功能按Sanders评分:优14例,良4例。结论股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗高能量伤股骨粗隆下骨折能取得良好疗效,骨折愈合率高,并发症少。     

股骨近端解剖钢板内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折

目的探讨老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的手术方法及治疗原则。方法采用闭合复位、股骨近端解剖钢板内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折26例。结果26例均手术成功,所有26例患者均获4～18个月的随访,平均为12.4个月。所有患者均在术后3个月内达到骨性愈合,关节功能评定:优13例,良11例,可2例,优良率92.3%。结论股骨近端解剖钢板内固定是治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的较好方法。     

DHS治疗股骨粗隆下骨折

目的观察DHS治疗股骨粗隆下骨折的疗效。方法对18例股骨粗隆下骨折患者采用DHS治疗。结果经6~18个月随访,平均12个月,所有骨折均获得骨性愈合,无一例髋内翻的发生,疗效满意。结论DHS是治疗股骨粗隆下骨折的理想方法之一,具有操作简单、手术损伤小、固定牢固、早期功能锻炼等优点。     

The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures

Introduction

PFNA design compacts the cancellous bone to provide increased stability and has been bio-mechanically proven to retard rotation and varus collapse.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2007, 62 consecutive patients with unstable proximal femoral fractures were treated with the PFNA.

Results

Twenty males and 42 females with a mean age of 78 years (44-94) were reviewed. In 48 patients, the fracture resulted from a low energy injury. The majority of the fractures belonged to AO/ASIF types 31A2.3 (22) and 31A3.2 (29). Twelve patients required open reduction. The PFNA blade position was central in 52 patients with a mean tip-apex distance (TAD) of 12 mm (range 4-34 mm). Post-operatively, five patients died within 3 months and two patients were lost to follow-up. Forty-nine fractures united between 3 and 4 months. Four patients had delayed union. The PFNA blade cut out rate was 3.6%.

Conclusions

Unstable proximal femoral fractures were treated successfully with the PFNA. The PFNA blade appears to provide additional anchoring in osteoporotic bone. No results have been published on this new design.     

解剖钢板内固定治疗儿童股骨转子间骨折

[目的] 探讨解剖钢板治疗儿童股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。[方法] 采用解剖钢板对15例儿童股骨转子间骨折进行手术固定治疗。平均随访时间20个月（8～36个月）。[结果]　本组骨折均在14周内愈合。1例出现髋内翻。无1例发生股骨头缺血性坏死、骨不连、骺板早闭和肢体短缩。参照刘尚礼疗效评定标准，14例疗效优良，优良率93．3％。[结论]　解剖钢板治疗儿童股骨转子间骨折符合生物力学观点，具有创伤小、手术操作简便、固定牢固、患髋能够早期功能锻炼等优点，是目前较好的固定方法。     

肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗成人肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析

目的 探讨肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效. 方法 采用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗53例肱骨近端骨折.测量术后前后位平片患肢肱骨颈干角,内翻复位、即颈干角＜125°为A组,颈干角≥125°为B组.随访时评估记录患者肩关节功能-Constant评分、疼痛评分、并发症以及测量患侧肱骨颈干角的变化. 结果 本组患者获得6～36个月随访（平均16.2个月）.末次随访时,Constant评分均分76分、优良率71.7％,VAS疼痛评分均分2.2.A组10例患者、B组43例患者,Constant评分B组优于A组（78±14.6分vs 67±11.7分,P＜0.05）,术后肱骨头内翻角度前者明显大于后者（P＜0.05）. 结论 采用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗成人肱骨近端骨折取得满意疗效.术中解剖复位、恢复良好的肱骨颈干角,是内固定稳定、预防术后肱骨头内翻及术后取得良好临床疗效的关键.     

股骨转子周围骨折手术治疗体会

2007年1月～2011年2月,我院对股骨转子周围骨折患者53例根据骨折类型采用3种不同方式进行手术治疗,报道如下。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组53例,男26例,女27例,年龄40～71岁(60岁以上32例)。按Evans分类:Ⅰ型6例,Ⅱ型8     

Contralateral reversed distal femoral locking plate for fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Purpose: Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur are being managed successfully with various intramedullary and extramedulary implants with reasonable success. However, these implants require precise placement under image intensifier guidance, which exposes the surgeon to substantial amount of radiation. It also restricts the management of these fractures at peripheral centers where facility of image intensifiers is not available. Keeping this in mind we designed this study to identify if contralateral reversed distal femoral locking plate can be used successfully without the use of image intensifier. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients (18 men and 6 women) with a mean age of 28 years (range 19e47 years) suffering subtrochanteric fractures of the femur underwent open reduction and internal fixation with reversed contralateral distal femoral locking plate. The outcome was assessed at the mean follow-up period of 3.2 years (range 2e4.6 years) using the Harris hip score. Results: Twenty-one fractures united with the primary procedure, with a mean time of consolidation being 11 weeks (range, 9e16 weeks). One patient developed superficial suture line infection, which resolved with oral antibiotics. Another patient had a fall 3 weeks after surgery and broke the plate. Repeat surgery with reversed distal femoral locking compression plate was performed along with bone grafting and the fracture united. Two cases had nonunion, which went in for union after bone grafting. The mean Harris hip score at the time of final follow-up was 90.63 (range 82-97). Conclusion: The reversed contralateral distal femoral plate is a biomechanically sound implant, which when used for fixation of the subtrochanteric fractures with minimal soft tissue stripping shows results comparable to those achieved by using other extramedullary implants as well as intramedullary devices. The added advantage of this implant is its usability in the absence of an image intensifier.     

股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间不稳定性骨折

目的评价股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)在老年股骨转子间不稳定性骨折治疗中的效果。方法采用PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间不稳定性骨折23例。按照Harris评分标准评价术后髋关节功能。结果 23例均获得随访,随访时间6.0~24.0个月,平均(7.9±2.1)个月。所有病例骨折均愈合,愈合时间6.0~12.0个月,平均(7.3±2.2)个月,其中21例患者已完全负重行走。参照Harris评分标准评定髋关节功能:优13例,良8例,可2例,优良率91.3%。结论 PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间不稳定性骨折操作简单,手术时间短,内固定可靠,是一种理想的治疗方法。     

股骨近端锁定钢板联合植骨治疗老年股骨转子下粉碎骨折

正2012年1月~2013年12月,我科采用股骨近端锁定钢板联合植骨治疗25例老年股骨转子下粉碎骨折患者,疗效满意,报道如下。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组25例,男17例,女8例,年龄61~75岁。骨折按Seinsheimer分型:Ⅲa型17例,Ⅳ型6例,Ⅴ型2例。伤后至手术时间5~11d。1.2治疗方法硬膜外麻醉下手术。在C臂机监视下牵引复位,从大转子至     

应用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折

目的观察、评价肱骨近端锁定钢板（LPHP）治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法通过分析自2008—01—2012—10收治并随访的52例肱骨近端二部分以上骨折。采用有限切开、透视复位、肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定的方法治疗,骨缺损患者采用自体髂骨及人工骨植骨。结果本组获得随访8—25个月（平均15个月）,肱骨近端骨折均得到了愈合,按Neer肩关节功能评分标准：优25例,良18例,可6例,差3例,优良率82．7％。未发生断板、断钉,无肱骨头缺血坏死及肩峰撞击综合征。结论应用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折,骨缺损者取髂骨、人工骨植骨,根据骨折类型及稳定性等指导功能锻炼,骨折愈合良好、并发症少、关节功能恢复好。     

Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

A review of the literature identified 15 different classification methods for subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Only eight of those classifications defined the area of bone, which constituted a subtrochanteric fracture. The actual length of femur defined as the subtrochanteric zone varied from 3 cm up to the level of the femoral isthmus. There was no agreement between the different classifications regarding the proximal and distal border or for those fractures, which traverse anatomical boundaries. In the various classifications, fractures were subdivided into 2-15 subgroups. The majority of the identified studies were unable to find the classifications useful in either determining treatment or predicting the outcome after treatment. We subdivided subtrochanteric fractures into three types based on the degree of fracture comminution. We examined the inter- and intra-observer agreement of our recommended classification. One orthopaedic consultant, one specialist hip fracture surgeon, two trainee registrar orthopaedic surgeons and one specialty trainee in orthopaedics, on two different occasions, 8 weeks apart, independently classified the radiographs of 20 patients with a subtrochanteric fracture. The mean kappa value for inter- and intra-observer variation was 0.71 and 0.79, respectively, with both showing substantial agreement and, therefore, this simpler classification is recommended. Based on the review of previous classification methods, we also recommend that the subtrochanteric zone be defined as the one in which the fracture line crossing the femur is predominantly within the area of bone extending 5 cm below the lower border of the lesser trochanter.     

解剖型锁定钢板固定治疗累及股骨干的转子间或转子下骨折

 目的 评价采用解剖型锁定钢板固定治疗累及股骨干的转子间或转子下骨折的临床疗效。方法 2009 年1 月至2011年6 月, 采用解剖型锁定钢板固定治疗累及股骨干的转子间或转子下骨折者72 例, 64 例患者获得随访。男50 例, 女14例;年龄21~79 岁, 平均42.8岁。所有患者均为股骨单侧闭合性骨折。受伤至手术时间间隔为2 h~16 d, 平均4.6 d。术后第l、3、6、9、12 个月门诊随访, 以后每年至少门诊复查一次。随访时所有患者均拍摄股骨正、侧位X 线片。临床疗效评价采用Harris髋关节功能评分标准。结果 64 例患者手术时间45~120 min, 平均65 min;术中出血量50~650 ml, 平均210 ml。所有患者均于术后3~15 d可下地扶拐行走。随访期间所有患者均未出现感染、下肢静脉血栓、螺钉切割股骨头及断钉现象, 2 例患者出现髋内翻短缩畸形, 无骨折不愈合患者。骨折愈合时间为3.6~10.5 个月, 平均5.2 个月。按Harris髋关节功能评分标准: 优45 例, 良14 例, 可5 例, 优良率为92.19豫(59/64)。结论 解剖型锁定钢板固定治疗方法具有微创、固定强度高、生物力学特性佳等特点, 在治疗累及股骨干的转子间或转子下骨折时具骨愈合率高、功能恢复快、并发症少等优点。