Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily oral telithromycin compared with clarithromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults

BACKGROUND: Telithromycin is a new antibacterial agent of the ketolide class designed to provide optimal treatment against common bacterial respiratory tract pathogens. Telithromycin was derived by structural modification of the basic macrolide molecule to allow tight binding to the bacterial ribosome that enhances potency and minimizes the risk for the development of resistant strains. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of telithromycin 800 mg once daily with those of high-dose clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily), each for 10 days, in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted at 54 centers in the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Chile. Patients aged >or=18 years with acute CAP were randomized to receive 10-day treatment with oral telithromycin 800 mg once daily (administered as two 400-mg encapsulated tablets in the morning) and placebo (administered as 2 encapsulated tablets identical to the telithromycin in the evening) or high-dose clarithromycin (500 mg administered as two 250-mg identical encapsulated tablets twice daily). The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome at the posttherapy, test-of-cure visit (days 17-24 after the completion of therapy) in the clinically assessable per-protocol population. Secondary efficacy variables included bacteriologic outcome at the posttherapy, test-of-cure visit, and clinical and bacteriologic outcomes at the late posttherapy visit (day 31-45). Tolerability was assessed using investigator observation, patient self-reporting, clinical laboratory data, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, and physical examination (including vital signs). RESULTS: A total of 493 patients were enrolled and 448 patients received >or=1 dose of study medication (224 patients/group). A diagnosis of CAP was confirmed in 416 patients (205 men, 211 women; median age, 43 years; telithromycin, n = 204; clarithromycin, n = 212). Clinical cure rates were 88.3% (143/162) in the telithromycin group and 88.5% ( 138/56) in the clarithromycin group. Bacterial eradication rates were comparable between treatment groups (telithromycin, (28/32) [87.5%]; clarithromycin, (29/30) [96.7%]. Both treatment were fairly well tolerated; adverse events were experienced in 57.0% of the patients treated with telithromycin and 49.1% of those treated with clarithromycin; most of these were assessed as mild. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of adult patients with CAP, telithromycin 800 mg once daily was an effective and fairly well-tolerated regimen for initial empiric treatment, with clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and tolerability equivalent to therapy with high-dose clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily).     

Efficacy and tolerability of 5-day,once-daily telithromycin compared with 10-day,twice-daily clarithromycin for the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillitis/pharyngitis: a multicenter,randomized, double-blind,parallel-group study

BACKGROUND: Telithromycin, a ketolide antibacterial, has been developed for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of 5-day, once-daily telithromycin with 10-day, twice-daily clarithromycin in adolescents and adults with acute tonsillitis/pharyngitis caused by group A beta-hemolytic streptococci ([GABHS] Streptococcus pyogenes). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, adolescent (aged > or = 13 years) and adult patients with a diagnosis of GABHS tonsillitis/pharyngitis received once-daily telithromycin 800 mg for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days) or twice-daily clarithromycin 250 mg for 10 days. Bacteriologic and clinical outcomes were assessed at a test-of-cure visit (days 16 to 23) and a late posttherapy visit (days 31 to 45). RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 463 (288 females, 175 males) were randomized to receive treatment (telithromycin, n = 232; clarithromycin, n = 231). The mean age of the telithromycin group was 30.9 years; in the clarithromycin group, it was 30.0 years. Bacterial eradication was achieved in 91.3% of telithromycin-treated patients and 88.1% of clarithromycin recipients (difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, -4.5 to 11.0). Clinical cure was achieved in 92.7% of telithromycin recipients and 91.1% of clarithromycin-treated patients (difference, 1.6%; 95% CI, -5.5 to 8.6). Bacteriologic and clinical cures for the 2 treatment groups also were similar at the late posttherapy visit. Treatment-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the telithromycin group than the clarithromycin group (67.2% vs 57.5%, respectively); diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were significantly more common with telithromycin than with clarithromycin (P = 0.004, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively). Adverse events were generally mild. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 days was an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for tonsillitis/pharyngitis caused by GABHS, providing similar bacteriologic and clinical efficacy to clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily for 10 days in the per-protocol population.     

Oral pharmacokinetically enhanced co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg, twice daily, compared with co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg, three times daily, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in European adults

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacokinetically enhanced co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg was designed to achieve high serum concentrations of amoxicillin over the 12 h dosing interval to eradicate Streptococcus pneumoniae with amoxicillin MICs of at least 4 mg/L. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of oral co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg twice daily versus co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg three times daily, for 7 or 10 days, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). RESULTS: The per-protocol (PP) population at follow-up (Days 18-39) comprised 114 patients receiving co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg and 116 receiving co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg. Clinical success at follow-up (primary efficacy endpoint) in the clinical PP population was 94.7% (108/114) for co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg versus 88.8% (103/116) for co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg [treatment difference (TD) = 5.9%, 95% CI: 1.1, 13.0]. Bacteriological success in the bacteriology PP population at follow-up was 85.0% (17/20) for co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg versus 77.3% (17/22) for co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg (TD = 7.7%, 95% CI: 15.8, 31.2). Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) were isolated in three patients (including two with bacteraemia) in the co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg group (amoxicillin MICs 8 mg/L, penicillin MICs 4 mg/L) and one in the comparator group; all were clinical and bacteriological successes. Co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg and co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg were associated with adverse events leading to withdrawal in 6.3% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg twice daily was at least as effective clinically as co-amoxiclav 875/125 mg three times daily in the treatment of CAP. Although few patients in this study had PRSP infection, 3/3 were successfully treated with co-amoxiclav 2000/125 mg.     

Efficacy of telithromycin in community-acquired pneumonia caused by pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to penicillin and/or erythromycin

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of oral telithromycin was assessed in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to penicillin and/or erythromycin. METHODS: Patients with CAP who had received telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 or 7-10 days (n = 2,289) in eight phase III clinical trials, or telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 7 days (n = 50) in a phase II study were included in this pooled analysis. Patients with S. pneumoniae as the cause of infection were identified, with particular focus on those infected with strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin (intermediate, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 0.12-1.0 mg/l; resistant, MIC >or=2.0 mg/l) and/or resistance to erythromycin (MIC >or=1.0 mg/l). Per-protocol clinical and bacteriological outcomes were assessed 7-14 days post-therapy in the phase III studies, and at 7-21 days post-therapy or at the end of therapy in the phase II study. RESULTS: Of the 327 telithromycin-treated patients with S. pneumoniae infection, 61 (19%) were infected with strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin and/or erythromycin. Clinical cure and bacterial eradication rates in these patients were 91.8% (56/61) and 93.4% (57/61), respectively. Corresponding clinical cure and bacterial eradication rates overall for all isolates of pneumococci were 94.5% (309/327) and 96.0% (314/327), respectively. All isolates with reduced susceptibility to penicillin and/or erythromycin were susceptible to telithromycin (MIC 相似文献   

Telithromycin for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Pooled data from three randomized, double-blind, multi- centre studies evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 days vs. standard comparators (10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily, clarithromycin 500 mg or cefuroxime axetil 500 mg twice daily) in the outpatient treatment for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Per-protocol clinical cure rates at post-therapy/test of cure (days 17-24) were 86.0 and 85.8% for telithromycin and comparators, respectively, and 79.1 and 78.7%, respectively, at late post-therapy (days 31-36). Clinical cure rates were comparable for patients at increased risk, including those of > or =65 years and those with severe infection or significant airway obstruction (telithromycin, > or =77.1%; comparators, > or =75.0%). Telithromycin was well tolerated. Most adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were gastrointestinal and of mild intensity. In conclusion, 5-day telithromycin therapy is as effective and well tolerated as 10-day treatment with standard comparators.     

Oral telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 days versus cefuroxime axetil 500 mg twice daily for 10 days in adults with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

The efficacy and safety of a 5-day regimen of 800 mg telithromycin once daily was compared with a standard 10-day regimen of 500 mg cefuroxime axetil twice daily in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving 376 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In clinically evaluable patients (n = 282), post-therapy clinical cure rates were 86.4% with telithromycin and 83.1% with cefuroxime axetil. In bacteriologically evaluable patients (n = 53), eradication or presumed eradication of the pathogen was achieved in 76.0% and 78.6% of telithromycin and cefuroxime axetil patients, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild; the most common were diarrhoea (12.8% versus 11.8%) and nausea (8.9% versus 3.2%) in telithromycin and cefuroxime axetil patients, respectively. The 5-day regimen of 800 mg telithromycin once daily was similar in efficacy and equally well tolerated as a 10-day regimen of 500 mg cefuroxime axetil twice daily in adults with AECB.     

Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily therapy with telithromycin for 5 or 10 days for the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of oral telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 vs. 10 days were assessed in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS). METHODS: Adults (n = 341) with confirmed AMS diagnosed on clinical signs and symptoms and sinus X-ray showing total opacity or air-fluid level were randomized to receive oral telithromycin for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days; n = 170) or 10 days (n = 171). Causative pathogens were isolated by pretreatment sinus puncture (day 1). Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes, and safety and tolerability endpoints were assessed. RESULTS: Clinical cure rates post-therapy (per-protocol; days 17-21) were comparable (91.1% in the 5-day group, n = 123; 91.0% in the 10-day group, n = 133). Bacteriologic eradication rates (per-protocol) were also similar (90.7 vs. 91.3%). Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A 5-day course of telithromycin 800 mg once daily is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for adults with AMS, comparable to a 10-day regimen.     

Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily oral therapy with telithromycin compared with trovafloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults

A randomised, double-blind study of adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) resulted in clinical cure rates of 90.0% for telithromycin and 94.2% for trovafloxacin. Bacteriological eradication rates were also comparable for both treatments. All high-risk patients (i.e. > or = 65 years old [n=25], Pneumonia Severity Index score > or = 111 [n=16], pneumococcal bacteraemia [n=4]) were clinically cured. In infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae, clinical cure rates were 93.3% (14/15) for telithromycin and 100% (16/16) for trovafloxacin. Possibly drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered mild and occurred in 47.2% of telithromycin and 33.0% of trovafloxacin patients. The most frequently reported, possibly drug-related, TEAEs were diarrhoea and nausea for telithromycin and diarrhoea and headache for trovafloxacin. Serious TEAEs occurred in 1.9% of telithromycin and 1.8% of trovafloxacin subjects and were considered not drug related. No deaths occurred during the study. Telithromycin and trovafloxacin were safe and comparable in efficacy in these patients with CAP.     

Levofloxacin in the empirical treatment of patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis: comparison with imipenem/cilastatin in an open, randomized trial

An open, randomized, multinational, multicentre study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily with imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with clinically suspected bacteraemia/ sepsis. Levofloxacin patients could change from iv to oral administration after a minimum of 48 h iv treatment if clinical signs and symptoms of sepsis had improved. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the clinical and bacteriological response at clinical endpoint. A total of 503 patients were randomized and 499 included in the intent-to-treat population. The per-protocol population comprised 287 patients with bacteriologically proven infection. Clinical cure rates at clinical endpoint in the intent-to-treat population and per-protocol population were 77% (184/239) and 89% (125/140), respectively, for levofloxacin and 68% (178/260) and 85% (125/147), respectively, for imipenem/cilastatin. At follow-up, the cure rates in the per-protocol population were 84% for levofloxacin and 69% for imipenem/cilastatin. The 95% confidence interval for both populations showed that levofloxacin was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin. A satisfactory bacteriological response was obtained in 87% (96/110) of levofloxacin patients and 84% (97/116) of imipenem/cilastatin patients at clinical endpoint. Adverse events possibly related to the study drug were reported in 74 (31%) levofloxacin patients and 79 (30%) imipenem/cilastatin patients. There were no clinically appreciable differences between the treatment groups. Levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, either iv or as sequential iv/oral therapy, was as effective and well tolerated as imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis.     

Comparison of short-term treatment regimen of ciprofloxacin versus long-term treatment regimens of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or norfloxacin for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections: a randomized, multicentre, open-label, prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bacteriological and clinical efficacy of three treatments for uncomplicated cystitis in ambulatory pre-menopausal women: ciprofloxacin 250 mg orally twice daily for 3 days, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, and norfloxacin 400 mg orally twice daily for 7 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 455 women were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: 151 received ciprofloxacin, 150 received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 154 received norfloxacin. Bacteriological cure and clinical resolution were evaluated 5-9 days and 4-6 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the three treatment groups: overall efficacy ranged from 78.5% for the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole group, to 84.5% for the ciprofloxacin group. The highest overall incidence of drug-related adverse effects occurred in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that a 3 day treatment with ciprofloxacin is at least as clinically and bacteriologically effective as 7 day treatments with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and norfloxacin for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.     

Gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days versus 7 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study

OBJECTIVES: Short-course therapy has been advocated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared the efficacy and safety of 5 and 7 day courses of gemifloxacin for outpatient treatment of mild-moderate CAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study, patients were randomized to receive 320 mg of oral gemifloxacin once daily for 5 or 7 days. Over 95% of all patients in each cohort had a Fine score of 相似文献   

Five day moxifloxacin therapy compared with 7 day clarithromycin therapy for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In this multinational, randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy and safety of a 5 day course of moxifloxacin 400 mg orally od was compared with that of a 7 day course of clarithromycin 500 mg orally bd. in 750 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, characterized by at least two of the symptoms: sputum purulence, increased sputum volume or increased dyspnoea. Seven days after the end of therapy, clinical cure was achieved for 89% (287 of 322) of efficacy-evaluable patients in the moxifloxacin group and 88% (289 of 327) of patients in the clarithromycin group (95% CI, -3.9%, 5.8%). At follow-up (21-28 days post-treatment), the continued clinical cure rates were 89% (256 of 287) for moxifloxacin and 89% (257 of 289) for clarithromycin. A total of 342 pathogenic bacteria were isolated from the sputum of 287 patients. The most common pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (37%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (31%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (18%). Seven days post-treatment, a successful bacteriological response was obtained for 77% (89 of 115) of patients in the moxifloxacin group and 62% (71 of 114) of patients in the clarithromycin group, indicating superiority of moxifloxacin (95% CI, 3.6%, 26.9%). Both treatments were well tolerated with few adverse events. This study demonstrated that for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis a 5 day course of moxifloxacin 400 mg od was clinically equivalent and bacteriologically superior to a 7 day course of clarithromycin 500 mg bd.     

Double-blind, comparative study of rufloxacin once daily versus amoxicillin three times a day in treatment of outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of two dosage schedules of rufloxacin once daily were compared with those of amoxicillin three times a day in the treatment of 192 outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Rufloxacin was given as a single oral dose of 400 mg on day 1 and single daily doses of 200 mg on the subsequent 9 days (n = 64) or as 300 mg on day 1 and then 150 mg daily for 9 days (n = 63); amoxicillin was given as 500 mg orally three times a day for 10 days (n = 65). Clinical and bacteriological assessments were carried out before treatment, between study days 3 and 5, and at days 1 and 8 after treatment. Pretreatment cultures were positive for 139 patients, the most frequently isolated pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. Clinical success rates were comparable in the three groups (94, 95, and 98%, respectively), as were bacteriological success rates at the end of treatment (93, 95, and 91%, respectively) and at follow-up (88, 95, and 98%, respectively). The power to detect a significant 15% difference in cure rates was 74.9%. Follow-up bacteriological failures from pneumococcal infection were 18% in both rufloxacin groups combined and 5% in the amoxicillin group. The 200-mg dose regimen achieved average steady-state concentrations in plasma higher than did the 150-mg dose regimen (3.75 versus 2.72 micrograms/ml). Adverse events occurred in 11 and 13 patients, respectively, on rufloxacin and 8 on amoxicillin. This study shows that rufloxacin once daily ay be a possible option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 200-mg daily oral dose preceeded by a loading dose of 400 mg displays a better pharmacokinetic profile than the lower dose.     

Pharmacokinetics and comparative effects of telithromycin (HMR 3647) and clarithromycin on the oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora

The pharmacokinetics in plasma and saliva of a new ketolide, telithromycin (HMR 3647), and the effect on the normal oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora were studied in healthy volunteers and compared with those of clarithromycin. Ten subjects received 800 mg telithromycin perorally once daily and 10 other subjects received 500 mg clarithromycin bid for 10 days. Blood, saliva and faecal specimens were collected at defined intervals before, during and after administration for pharmacokinetic and microbiological analyses. In subjects receiving telithromycin, the mean C:(max), AUC and C:(24) (24 h) in saliva exceeded the values obtained from plasma, while saliva and serum pharmacokinetic parameters were in the same range for the clarithromycin group. The quantitative ecological disturbances in the normal microflora during administration of telithromycin were moderate and comparable to those associated with clarithromycin administration. No overgrowth of yeasts or Clostridium difficile occurred. Emergence of resistant strains was seen in both treatment groups. Administration of both telithromycin and clarithromycin was associated with significant increases in MICs for intestinal Bacteroides isolates, which persisted 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. In addition, a significant emergence of highly clarithromycin-resistant alpha-haemolytic streptococci, intestinal enterococci and Enterobacteriaceae was detected at day 10 in the clarithromycin group. In conclusion, administration of telithromycin resulted in high drug levels in saliva, which indicates a good therapeutic profile for throat infections. Telithromycin seems to have a more favourable ecological profile compared with clarithromycin in terms of resistance development in the normal microflora.     

Five day clarithromycin modified release versus 10 day penicillin V for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized study

OBJECTIVE: A multicentre, comparative, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin modified release (MR) versus penicillin V for pharyngitis due to group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS). METHODS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients (12-40 years) with acute pharyngotonsillitis and a positive Streptococcus A antigen immunoassay test were randomized to receive clarithromycin MR 500 mg od for 5 days or penicillin 590 mg tds for 10 days. Patients were clinically evaluated and a throat swab for culture obtained before treatment, after treatment (day 8 or 13 depending on the treatment arm) and at the follow-up visit (day 30). The main criterion for efficacy was the bacteriological cure rate after treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients were considered for the intent-to-treat analysis. After treatment, clinical cure rates were 88.1% in the clarithromycin group and 92.4% in the penicillin group, and eradication rates were 82.8% and 83.6%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments. Three hundred and three (87%) patients had a positive culture before treatment, among which 29 (9.7%) were found to be clarithromycin resistant. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were clinically and bacteriologically evaluable for per protocol analysis. After treatment, clinical cure rates were 95.2% in the clarithromycin group and 97.3% in the penicillin group, and eradication rates were 94.4% and 92%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was shown. Adverse events occurred in 46 patients of the clarithromycin group and 31 of the penicillin group (with no statistical difference). Most of them were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin MR administered once daily for 5 days is as safe and effective as penicillin V administered three times a day for 10 days in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis.     

Efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 milligrams twice daily for 5 days versus amoxicillin-clavulanate at 875/125 milligrams twice daily for 7 days in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

This randomized, controlled trial was designed to show that a short, 5-day course of pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg (Augmentin XR) is as effective clinically as a longer, 7-day course of conventional amoxicillin-clavulanate at 875/125 mg (both given twice daily) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg was designed to extend the therapeutic levels of amoxicillin in serum over the 12-h dosing interval, compared with conventional formulations, to eradicate bacterial strains for which amoxicillin MICs were < or =4 microg/ml while retaining efficacy against beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. A total of 893 patients were randomized and received study medication (amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg for 443 patients and 875/125 mg for 450 patients). Overall, 141 patients receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg and 135 receiving the comparator formulation had at least one pathogen identified at screening. Amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg was as effective clinically in the per-protocol (PP) population at the test of cure (days 14 to 21, primary efficacy endpoint) as amoxicillin-clavulanate at 875/125 mg (clinical success rates of 93.0 and 91.2%, respectively; treatment difference, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.2, 5.7). Bacteriological success in the bacteriology PP population was high for both formulations (amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg, 76.7%; amoxicillin-clavulanate at 875/125 mg, 73.0%; treatment difference, 3.8; 95% CI, -7.5, 15.0). Both therapies were well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events. Fewer than 5% of patients in each group withdrew from the study due to adverse events. The shorter, 5-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2,000/125 mg was shown to be as effective clinically as a longer, 7-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanate at 875/125 mg, with high bacteriological efficacy and no difference in tolerability.     

Efficacy and safety of twice-daily pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin/clavulanate (2000/125 mg) in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia in a country with a high prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES: This randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg twice daily versus amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg three times daily, both given orally for 7 or 10 days, in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia in Spain, a country with a high prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following 2:1 randomization, 566 patients (intent-to-treat population) received either amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg (n = 374) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg (n = 192). RESULTS: Among the patients who did not deviate from the protocol (clinical per-protocol population), clinical success at day 21-28 post-therapy (test of cure; primary efficacy endpoint) was 92.4% (266/288) for amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg and 91.2% (135/148) for amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg (treatment difference, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, -4.4, 6.6). Bacteriological success at test of cure in the bacteriology per-protocol population was 90.8% (79/87) with amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg and 86.0% (43/50) with amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg (treatment difference 4.8; 95% confidence interval, -6.6, 16.2). At test of cure, amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg was clinically and bacteriologically effective against 7/7 penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC > or = 2 mg/L) isolates (including three amoxicillin non-susceptible strains) and amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg against 5/5 isolates (including one amoxicillin non-susceptible strain). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Amoxicillin/clavulanate 2000/125 mg was at least as effective clinically and as safe as amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults in a country with a high prevalence of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and has a more convenient twice daily posology.     

Randomized, double-blind study of short-course (5 day) grepafloxacin versus 10 day clarithromycin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

The efficacy and safety of grepafloxacin were compared with clarithromycin in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial of 805 patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Patients were randomized to receive grepafloxacin 400 mg od for either 5 (n = 273) or 10 days (n = 268) or clarithromycin 250 mg bd for 10 days (n = 261). Patients were assessed pre-treatment, 3-5 days during treatment, 1-3 days post-treatment and at follow-up (21-28 days post-treatment). The clinical success rates for the evaluable patients were 91% in the 5 day grepafloxacin group, 95% in the 10 day grepafloxacin group and 86% in the clarithromycin group. At follow-up, respective rates were 72%, 81% and 73%. A total of 513 pathogens were isolated from the pre-treatment sputum specimens of 400 (49%) patients. The primary pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (36% of isolates), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (27%), Moraxella catarrhalis (12%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%) and Staphylococcus aureus (3%). Pathogens were eradicated or presumed eradicated at post-treatment in 85%, 91% and 58% of evaluable patients treated with grepafloxacin for 5 days, grepafloxacin 10 days and clarithromycin 10 days, respectively. The eradication rates in both grepafloxacin groups were significantly greater than the clarithromycin group (P<0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and incidence of drug-related adverse events in each group was comparable. This study demonstrates that both a 5 and a 10 day regimen of grepafloxacin 400 mg od are as clinically and bacteriologically effective as in the treatment of ABECB clarithromycin 250 mg bd. for 10 days.     

Comparison of the efficacy of 250 mg and 500 mg clarithromycin used with lansoprazole and amoxicillin in eradication regimens for<Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> infection

AIMS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 250 mg and 500 mg clarithromycin used with lansoprazole and amoxicillin in eradication of H. pylori infection. 235 patients with H. pylori infections and non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to one of the following regimens: lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg (LAC250) and lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg (LAC500). All drugs were given twice daily for 7 days. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori with the CLO test. Gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomization and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy were used for histology and culture. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin and amoxicillin was determined with the E-test. RESULTS: 101 patients in the LAC250 mg group and 102 in the LAC500 group completed the study. On intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rates were 81% with LAC250 and 82% with LAC500 (p=0.88). On per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 92% with LAC250 and 96% with LAC500 (p=0.23). Among the 203 patients (86% of the entire study group) for whom H. pylori antibiotic-sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance to clarithromycin was found in 9% and to amoxicillin in 0%. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 94%/38% for LAC250 (p < 0.001) and 93%/40% for LAC500 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The cure rates for the two regimens were similar, although adverse effects were more frequent with the LAC500 regimen, suggesting that 250 mg of clarithromycin b.d. may be sufficient in our patient population.