Experience with selective operative and nonoperative treatment of splenic injuries in 193 patients.

During the past decade splenic salvage procedures rather than splenectomy have been considered the preferred treatment for traumatic splenic injuries. Splenic preservation has been most often accomplished by splenorrhaphy and more recently by a controversial nonoperative approach. This report delineates indications, contraindications, and results with splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, and nonoperative treatment based on an 11-year experience (1978 to 1989) in which 193 consecutive adult patients with splenic injuries were treated. One hundred sixty-seven patients (86.5%) underwent urgent operation. Of these, 111 (66%) were treated by splenorrhaphy or partial splenectomy and 56 (34%) were treated by splenectomy. During the last 4 years, 26 additional patients (13.5%) were managed without operation. Patients considered for nonoperative treatment were alert, hemodynamically stable with computed tomographic evidence of isolated grades I to III splenic injuries. Overall 24% of the injuries resulted from penetrating trauma, whereas 76% of the patients sustained blunt injuries. Complications were rare, with two patients in the splenorrhaphy group experiencing re-bleeding (1.8%) and one patient (4%) failing nonoperative treatment. The mortality rate for the entire group was 4%. This report documents that splenorrhaphy can safely be performed in 65% to 75% of splenic injuries. Splenectomy is indicated for more extensive injuries or when patients are hemodynamically unstable in the presence of life-threatening injuries. Nonoperative therapy can be accomplished safely in a small select group (15% to 20%), with a success rate of nearly 90% if strict criteria for selection are met.     

Prospective study of the early postoperative course of splenic rupture: spleen preservation versus splenectomy]

The haematological and immunological changes after splenectomy have been the subject of intensive research in recent years. As a consequence there has been a clear trend towards splenic salvage. Due to the availability of improved diagnostic investigations (sonography, CT) nonoperative treatment with close observation has become increasingly important in adults. 75 patients with documented splenic injury were prospectively evaluated over a 45-month period with an emphasis upon splenic preservation. Unstable patients had operative exploration with attempt at splenorrhaphy or partial splenic resection. Stable patients were managed nonoperatively, regardless of the degree of splenic injury as determined by sonography and/or computed tomography. In 38 patients the spleen was preserved by operative preservation in 20 and nonoperative treatment in 18 patients. 37 patients required splenectomy. Four patients were managed initially by nonoperative treatment, but required exploration for secondary rupture at 7, 7, 10 and 13 days. Delayed splenectomy was performed in three patients and one patient was treated by splenorrhaphy 7 days after admission. Bleeding complications occurred in one patient after splenorrhaphy (bleeding from the pancreatic tail) and the bleeding vessel could be transfixed during the same anaesthetic. Four patients required reexploration after splenectomy for hemorrhage (2) and evacuation of infected haematomas. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) of the splenectomy and splenic preservation group was determined. Splenectomised patients showed in the postoperative follow-up a significantly increased infection rate (40%, p less than 0.02) when compared to patients with splenic preservation (10%) or nonoperative treatment (11%), even when they were matched in respect of multiple trauma using the Injury Severity Score (ISS).     

Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management.

OBJECTIVE: The recognition that splenectomy renders patients susceptible to lifelong risks of septic complications has led to routine attempts at splenic conservation after trauma. In 1990, the authors reported that over an 11-year study period involving 193 patients, splenorrhaphy was the most common splenic salvage method (66% overall) noted, with nonoperative management employed in only 13% of blunt splenic injuries. This report describes changing patterns of therapy in 190 consecutive patients with splenic injuries seen during a subsequent 6-year period (1990 to 1996). An algorithmic approach for patient management and pitfalls to be avoided to ensure safe nonoperative management are detailed. METHODS: Nonoperative management criteria included hemodynamic stability and computed tomographic examination without shattered spleen or other injuries requiring celiotomy. RESULTS: Of 190 consecutive patients, 102 (54%) were managed nonoperatively: 96 (65%) of 147 patients with blunt splenic injuries, which included 15 patients with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wounds (24% of all splenic stab wounds). Fifty-six patients underwent splenectomy (29%) and 32 splenorrhaphy (17%). The mean transfusion requirement was 6 units for splenectomy survivors and 0.8 units for nonoperative therapy (85% received no transfusions). Fifteen of the 16 major infectious complications that occurred followed splenectomy. Two patients failed nonoperative therapy (2%) and underwent splenectomy, and one patient required splenectomy after partial splenic resection. There no missed enteric injuries in patients managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality rate was 5.2%, with no deaths following nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries has replaced splenorrhaphy as the most common method of splenic conservation. The criteria have been extended to include patients previously excluded from this form of therapy. As a result, 65% of all blunt splenic injuries and select stab wounds can be managed with minimal transfusions, morbidity, or mortality, with a success rate of 98%. Splenectomy, when necessary, continues to be associated with excessive transfusion and an inordinately high postoperative sepsis rate.     

Selective management of blunt splenic trauma

During a recent 8-year period, 235 patients with documented blunt splenic trauma were treated. After exclusion of 39 patients with early deaths (19 dead on arrival, nine died in emergency room, and 11 died in operating room), the 196 remaining patients were treated in accordance with an evolving selective management program. Definitive management included splenectomy in 117 patients (59.7%), repair in 32 (16.3%), and nonoperative treatment in 47 (24%). A spectrum of blunt splenic trauma, as manifested by the degree of associated injuries (Injury Severity Scores), hemodynamic status, and blood transfusion requirements, was identified and permitted application of a rational selective management program that proved safe and effective for all age groups. Comparative analysis of the three methods of treatment demonstrated differences that were more a reflection of the overall magnitude of total bodily injury sustained rather than the specific manner in which any injured spleen was managed. Retrospective analysis of 19 nonoperative management failures enabled establishment of the following selection criteria for nonoperative management: absolute hemodynamic stability; minimal or lack of peritoneal findings; and maximal transfusion requirement of 2 units for the splenic injury. With operative management, splenorrhaphy is preferred, but it was often precluded by associated life-threatening injuries or by technical limitations. Of 42 attempted splenic repairs, ten (24%) were abandoned intraoperatively. There were no late failures of repair. In many cases of blunt splenic trauma, splenectomy still remains the most appropriate course of action.     

Management outcomes in splenic injury: a statewide trauma center review.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways now highlight both observation and operation as acceptable initial therapeutic options for the management of patients with splenic injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment trends for splenic injury in all North Carolina trauma centers over a 6-year period. METHODS: Splenic injuries in adults over a 6-year period (January 1988-December 1993) were identified in the North Carolina Trauma Registry using ICD-9-CM codes. Patients were divided into four groups by method of management: 1) no spleen operation, 2) splenectomy, 3) definitive splenorrhaphy, and 4) splenorrhaphy failure followed by splenectomy. The authors examined age, mechanism of injury, admitting blood pressure, and severity of injury by trauma score and injury severity score. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Comparisons were made between adult (17-64 years of age) and geriatric (older than 65 years of age) patients and between patients with blunt and penetrating injury. Resource utilization (length of stay, hospital charges) and outcome (mortality) were compared. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-five patients were identified with splenic injury. Rate of splenic preservation increased over time and was achieved in more than 50% of patients through nonoperative management (40%) and splenorrhaphy (12%). Splenorrhaphy was not used commonly in either blunt or penetrating injury. Overall mortality was 13%. Geriatric patients had a higher mortality and resource utilization regardless of their mechanism of injury or method of management.CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management represents the prevailing method of splenic preservation in both the adult and geriatric population in North Carolina trauma center hospitals. Satisfactory outcomes and economic advantages accompany nonoperative management in this adult population.     

Risk factors for splenectomy in children with blunt splenic trauma

Background/Purpose: Nonoperative management and splenic preservation have become standards of care for management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma. However, review of the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study (PTOS) registry found that 15% of children with blunt splenic injury still underwent splenectomy. The authors sought to determine the factors that predisposed to splenectomy in this population. Methods: Between 1993 and 1997, 754 children, ages 0 to 16 years, who sustained blunt splenic trauma were entered in the PTOS database. These patients were stratified into groups according to the mode of management: nonoperative, splenorrhaphy, or splenectomy. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with splenectomy. Results: Overall, 15.1% of patients underwent splenectomy, 7.4% underwent splenorrhaphy, and 77.5% were treated nonoperatively. Spleen injury grade, nonspleen abdominal injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale 3 to 8, and age 15 to 16 years were significant determinants of splenectomy by multivariate analysis. Children treated at pediatric trauma centers (PTC) underwent significantly fewer splenectomies. Conclusions: Injury grade, but not hemodynamic instability, was a significant independent determinant of splenectomy in children with blunt splenic trauma. Children treated at PTC are less likely to undergo splenectomy. Ongoing analysis of the management of blunt pediatric splenic injury and reduction of unnecessary splenectomies are needed to optimize care for injured children.     

Follow-up abdominal CT is not necessary in low-grade splenic injury

Nonoperative management of splenic injury has become the standard of care in the hemodynamically stable patient. The time period of observation and the utility of follow-up scanning remain an area of debate. This study examined the utility of follow-up abdominal CT for detection of delayed vascular injury in patients with low-grade splenic injury. A retrospective review of all patients with low-grade splenic injuries undergoing nonoperative management from June 2000 to June 2004 was performed. Patients underwent follow-up abdominal CT 48 to 72 hours after admission to rule out delayed vascular injury and were discharged if the results were negative. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, abdominal CT results, and splenic salvage. A total of 472 patients underwent nonoperative management for splenic injury, with 140 patients treated with simple observation during this protocol. All patients were successfully managed with simple observation with no nonoperative failures; there were two instances of delayed vascular injury on follow-up CT. Both patients with progression of injury had decreasing hematocrit levels during admission prior to follow-up abdominal CT scan. Overall, the injury severity score was 22 points and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury severity score was 1.8 points. Length of hospital stay was 2.8 days for patients with predominately splenic injury and 10 days for the overall cohort. Follow-up abdominal CT confers no benefit in patients with low-grade splenic injury, and a stable hematocrit level and abdominal exam.     

Pediatric splenic injuries with a contrast blush: successful nonoperative management without angiography and embolization

Background

The presence of a contrast blush on computed tomography (CT) in adult splenic trauma is a risk factor for failure of nonoperative management. Arterial embolization is believed to reduce this failure rate. The significance of a blush in pediatric trauma is unknown. The authors evaluated the outcome of children with blunt splenic trauma and contrast extravasation.

Methods

The trauma registry was queried for all pediatric patients with blunt splenic injuries. Admission CT was reviewed for injury grade and presence of an arterial blush by a radiologist blinded to patient outcome. Hospital and office charts were reviewed for success of nonoperative management, late splenic rupture, and other complications.

Results

One hundred seven children with blunt splenic trauma were identified over a 6-year period. Mean injury grade was 2.9. Six patients required emergency splenectomy. An additional 7 patients met hemodynamic criteria for surgical intervention (3 splenectomies, 4 splenorrhaphies). Admission CT was available in 63 patients. An arterial blush was identified in 5 (9.7%). Four remained stable and were treated conservatively. One underwent splenectomy for hemodynamic instability. There were no cases of delayed splenic rupture, failed nonoperative treatment, or long-term complications.

Conclusions

Contrast blush in children with blunt splenic trauma is rare, and its presence alone does not appear to predict delayed rupture or failure of nonoperative treatment. Based on this limited series, splenic artery embolization does not have a place in the management of splenic injuries in children.     

Changing trends in the management of splenic injury

: A gradual change in the management of splenic injuries has occurred at our institution. This study was therefore undertaken to determine whether changes in management of splenic injury influenced outcomes during the past 30 years. : A retrospective study of patients admitted with splenic trauma between 1965 and 1994 was performed. Two hundred seven patients were identified and demographic and outcome data were recorded. Patients were then grouped based upon the period in which they received treatment (ie, Period I [1965 to 1974], Period II [1975 to 1984], and Period III [1985 to 1994]) and the type of treatment received (ie, splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or observation). : More patients were treated in Period III than in the other two periods, and Period III patients had shorter hospital stays. Splenectomy was solely used during Period I; splenorrhaphy and observation were occasionally performed during Period II; and splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, and observation were performed in near-equal numbers during Period III. Mortality was similar for each period, though Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were higher during later years. When compared by treatment modality, patients receiving splenectomy had higher ISS and splenic injury classifications. : Patients treated by splenorrhaphy and observation for splenic injury have markedly increased over the past 30 years without adverse outcome.     

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the success rate of nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in an institution using splenic embolization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center with blunt splenic injury. Data review included patient demographics, computed tomographic (CT) scan results, management technique, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 648 patients with blunt splenic injury were admitted, 280 of whom underwent immediate surgical management. Three hundred sixty-eight underwent planned nonoperative management, and 70 patients were treated with observation, serial abdominal examination, and follow-up abdominal CT scanning. All were hemodynamically stable, with a 100% salvage rate. One hundred sixty-six patients had a negative angiogram, with a nonoperative salvage rate of 94%, and 132 patients underwent embolization, with a nonoperative salvage rate of 90%. Overall salvage rates decreased with increasing injury grade; however, over 80% of grade 4 and 5 injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. The salvage rate was similar for main coil embolization versus selective or combined embolization techniques. Admission abdominal CT scan correlated with splenic salvage rates. Significant hemoperitoneum, extravasation, and pseudoaneurysm had acceptable salvage rates, whereas arteriovenous fistula had a high failure rate, even after embolization. CONCLUSION: Splenic embolization is a valuable adjunct to splenic salvage in our experience, allowing for the increased use of nonoperative management and higher salvage rates for American Association for the Surgery of Trauma splenic injury grades when compared with prior studies. Main coil embolization has a similar salvage rate when compared with other angiographic techniques. An arteriovenous fistula as a CT finding was predictive of a 40% nonoperative failure rate.     

Progressive splenomegaly following splenic artery embolization

Nonoperative management of splenic injury is standard in hemodynamically stable patients. Splenic artery embolization is a useful adjunct to nonoperative management for patients with ongoing hemorrhage. However, the complications of embolization are not well defined. We report a case of progressive splenomegaly requiring delayed splenectomy after embolization. A 57-year-old hemodynamically stable, blunt trauma patient had a Grade III splenic injury with associated subcapsular hematoma. Nonoperative management was initiated, but his hemoglobin levels progressively declined prompting proximal splenic artery embolization. His hemoglobin levels remained stable postembolization and he was discharged on postinjury day 5. The patient was readmitted 10 days later with increasing abdominal pain and shortness of breath. Repeat CT revealed an enlarged subcapsular fluid collection, but his hemoglobin level remained stable and he was discharged 5 days later. He returned again 2 days later with similar complaints, and CT demonstrated that his subcapsular fluid collection was further enlarged. Repeat hemoglobin level was again stable. The patient requested operative intervention due to intractable pain, and splenectomy was performed without complications. Operative findings included a sterile, contained subcapsular hematoma. Splenic embolization has emerged as an adjunct to nonoperative management of splenic injury; however, the indications for splenic embolization are yet to be defined, and the spectrum and frequency of potential complications are poorly documented. This case report highlights a potentially serious complication that can occur after splenic embolization.     

Early selective angioembolization improves success of nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury

The role of angioembolization in the management of patients with blunt spleen injury is still under debate. Our study examined the impact of splenic artery embolization (SAE) on the outcome of such patients. We reviewed 114 consecutive blunt abdominal trauma patients with isolated splenic injury over a period of 40 months, including 61 patients seen before (Group A) and 53 patients seen after (Group B) the adoption of SAE. Hemodynamically unstable patients underwent the abdominal exploration and stable patients were evaluated with CT scans of abdomen and pelvis. Patients underwent SAE based on the findings of CT scans, including contrast extravasation or large hemoperitoneum. For initially stable patients, there were no differences in nonoperative management success rate between Groups A and B in regards to injury severity score > or =16, age, or grades of splenic injury > or =3. In comparison, among patients with large hemoperitoneum found by abdominal CT, Group B had significantly better nonoperative management success rates (P < 0.05). SAE was successful to control bleeding in 80 per cent of patients. Partial splenic infarction was noted in all patients after the procedure but it resolved by six months. By using criteria developed based on abdominal CT scans for angioembolization, we are able to improve nonoperative splenic salvage rate.     

Contrast extravasation predicts the need for operative intervention in children with blunt splenic trauma

BACKGROUND: Although the presence of a contrast blush (CB) on computed tomographic (CT) scan is associated with an increased failure rate of nonoperative management in adults with blunt splenic injury, little information is available for the pediatric population, where nonoperative management is the standard of care. Our aim was to determine whether the finding of CB on CT scan could predict failure of nonoperative therapy in children with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 343 patients admitted with blunt splenic injury to our Level I pediatric trauma center over a 7-year period was performed. All CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist who was blinded to the patient outcome. We excluded 127 patients who either underwent immediate laparotomy without a CT scan or whose CT scans were unavailable at the time of this review. We divided the patients into two groups on the basis of the presence or absence of CB on the updated reading of the CT scan. Demographic variables analyzed included age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, initial hemoglobin and hematocrit, and emergency department pulse rate and systolic blood pressure. Outcome measures compared include length of stay, length of intensive care unit stay, the need for splenic intervention, and mortality. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test for skewed data. Categorical data were compared using chi2 analysis or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was assigned to values of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Among the study population (N = 216), 27 patients (12.5%) had CB on CT scan. Patients with CB had significantly lower hematocrit (p = 0.0004) and required operative intervention more frequently than those without CB (22% vs. 4%;p = 0.0008). Among patients with CB, mean pulse rate at presentation was higher in those that required splenic intervention (SI) (129 +/- 20.1) compared with those who underwent successful nonoperative therapy (100.4 +/- 23.1; p = 0.01). Only grade V injuries correlated with the need for laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Children with blunt splenic injury who have CB on CT scan are more likely to require SI than those without CB. However, because the majority of patients with CB did not require SI, in the absence of hemodynamic instability, this finding may be insufficient to determine the need for SI. CB is a specific marker of active bleeding that may predict the need for early splenic intervention in a specific subset of patients at presentation.     

Splenic artery embolization: Have we gone too far?

BACKGROUND: Splenic artery angioembolization (EMBO) has been promoted to increase the success rate of nonoperative management of splenic injuries. Our institutional clinical pathway calls for EMBO in the setting of ongoing splenic bleeding or contrast blush on computed tomography scan. We perceived a higher rate of failure than that reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with splenic EMBO to identify predictors of failure of nonoperative/EMBO management. METHODS: The trauma registry and interventional radiology database of a Level I trauma center were reviewed for patients with splenic injuries from January 2000 through June 2004. Charts and films of patients undergoing EMBO were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 221 patients admitted with blunt splenic injuries. Of these, 165 (75%) were selected for nonoperative management; 41 (25%) of them underwent splenic EMBO. Of the 41, 11 patients (27%) failed nonoperative/EMBO management. Of nine patients with low-grade injury (I, II) and small or no hemoperitoneum, none failed EMBO, whereas 10 of 23 (43%) with high-grade injury (III, IV, V) and moderate or large hemoperitoneum failed. EMBO was more likely to fail if extravasation was seen on angiography (59% vs. 4%). Coils (vs. particles) and main (vs. selective) artery EMBO were more often successful. Of EMBO patients who experienced transient hypotension, 57% required splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: EMBO may have salvaged many spleens, but splenectomy was required in 27% of EMBO patients. Patient selection is critical to successful management. Any hypotension in the face of a contrast blush probably warrants laparotomy. The combination of high grade injury and significant hemoperitoneum, or extravasation on angiogram, predict a high risk of failure and thus warrant a low threshold for splenectomy if bleeding persists. Technical EMBO considerations may impact success, but this requires further investigation.     

Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy for intraoperative splenic injuries

The preferred management option for intraoperative splenic injuries is organ repair and preservation rather than splenectomy given the important immunologic function of the spleen. Wrapping the injured spleen with a Dexon mesh has been shown to be an effective alternative to splenectomy for significant splenic bleeding. However, this technique uses a foreign body that carries a theoretical infectious risk particularly in cases in which the alimentary tract has been opened. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy when used for intraoperative splenic injuries was associated with significant infectious complications. The clinical courses of 23 patients who had Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy performed at a university teaching hospital for intraoperative splenic injury from 1991 to 1999 were reviewed. Eleven patients (48%) had their gastrointestinal tract opened during the surgery. No patients developed an intra-abdominal abscess or required reoperation for bleeding. The most common postoperative complications were left lower lobe atelectasis (18 patients, 78%), postoperative fever (13 patients, 56%), and left pleural effusion (12 patients, 52%). Dexon mesh splenorrhaphy effectively controls splenic bleeding due to intraoperative injury without significant infectious complications.     

The significance of contrast blush on computed tomography in children with splenic injuries

Purpose

Most children and adults with blunt splenic injuries are treated nonoperatively by well-established management protocols. The “blush sign” is an active pooling of contrast material within or around the spleen seen during intravenous enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. Adult treatment algorithms often include the “blush sign” as an indication for embolization or surgical intervention. This study was designed to evaluate the implications of the “blush sign” in children with blunt splenic injuries.

Methods

A review was performed of all children with blunt splenic injuries treated between January 1996 and December 2001 at a level I pediatric trauma center using an established solid organ injury protocol. The demographic, CT imaging, and outcome data were recorded. Treatment was categorized as operative or nonoperative. A single pediatric radiologist retrospectively reviewed all available CT scans to confirm injury grade and the presence or absence of a “blush sign.”

Results

There were 133 eligible children admitted with blunt splenic trauma, with a mean age of 9.1 years (range, 1 to 15), including 86 children with an abdominal CT available for review. A “blush sign” on initial CT scan was noted in 6 children, all with grade 3 or above splenic injuries, 5 of who were treated nonoperatively. In this series, the single child with a “blush sign” who did not respond to nonoperative treatment had a severe polytrauma requiring urgent splenectomy and left nephrectomy. None of the children died of their splenic injury.

Conclusions

Although associated with higher grades of injury, the blush sign did not mandate embolization or surgical intervention in children with blunt splenic trauma in this series. Severe splenic injuries with a blush sign on the initial CT scan may be successfully treated nonoperatively when using an established treatment protocol. Management should be based primarily on physiological response to injury rather than the radiologic features of the injury.     

Physiology after pediatric splenic injury

BACKGROUND: The splenic injury computed tomographic (CT) grade is used to guide nonoperative management. A study was conducted to determine whether this grade correlates with patient physiology. METHODS: Records of consecutive children with isolated spleen injuries were reviewed. Vital signs, fluids administered, urine output, and hematocrit values from the scene through 120 hours after admission were retrieved. A blinded radiologist reviewed CT scans. Statistical analyses were conducted to test for a linear relationship between injury grade and physiologic parameters. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with isolated splenic injuries and available CT scans were located. CT injury grade correlated directly with pulse, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure and inversely with hematocrit. No correlation was found with pulse pressure, urine output, or maximum temperature. CONCLUSION: The CT grade of splenic injury correlates directly with pulse, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure and inversely with hematocrit. CT injury grade correlates with physiologic impact and may guide management decisions.     

Subcapsular hematoma as a predictor of delayed splenic rupture.

Over the past 46 months at a level I trauma center, 966 computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for blunt abdominal trauma. Eighty-three (8.6%) demonstrated splenic injury, and 31 (3.2%) of these showed a subcapsular hematoma with or without associated parenchymal damage. Of the 31 patients, 23 were managed conservatively, based initially upon surgeons' preference (14 patients) and after March 1990 to conform to the authors' splenic trauma protocol (nine patients). The eight patients operated upon were hemodynamically stable and all underwent splenectomy. Subcapsular hematoma, as diagnosed by preoperative CT scan, was confirmed in each of the eight celiotomies. Parenchymal involvement, which had also been identified in these eight patients by CT, was evident at operation in all, and hilar involvement occurred in three. None of the 23 observed patients developed delayed splenic rupture. All were discharged home with outpatient follow-up in surgical clinic to at least 1 month without further complication. The authors came to the following conclusions: 1) Subcapsular hematoma is neither a predictor for delayed splenic rupture, nor by itself an indication for operative management of the injured spleen in the hemodynamically stable patient; 2) Degree of parenchymal injury based on CT morphology, specifically hilar involvement, signifies the need for laparotomy with splenectomy; 3) Splenorrhaphy has a reduced role in splenic trauma because most injuries now operated upon are severe.     

Nonoperative treatment of adult splenic trauma: development of a computed tomographic scoring system that detects appropriate candidates for expectant management

We reviewed the charts of 87 patients with documented splenic injuries resulting from blunt trauma admitted to a regional trauma referral center during the 32-month period beginning in January 1984. Delayed celiotomy was defined as surgical intervention for splenic injury after a trail of nonoperative management lasting at least 24 hours. Delayed celiotomy was not required in any of the 16 cases in the pediatric age group (age less than or equal to 17 years) who were initially managed nonoperatively. In contrast, of the 27 adults who were initially treated nonoperatively, ten (37%) ultimately required celiotomy. Although splenorrhaphy was successfully performed in 21 of 44 patients undergoing early operation, all ten of the patients requiring celiotomy after an unsuccessful trial of observation underwent splenectomy rather than a spleen-preserving procedure. Of the 27 adults who were initially managed nonoperatively, 24 had abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed during their initial diagnostic evaluation. Twenty-three of these scans were reviewed by one of the authors. A CT scoring system was developed, based on the degree of splenic parenchymal and capsular injury and the amount of fluid in the abdomen and the pelvis. Adult patients who were successfully treated without operation had a significantly (p = 0.011) lower total CT score than did patients who required delayed celiotomy. No adult with a total CT score less than 2.5 required delayed operative intervention. These data support