T Cell‐mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplants: A Personal Viewpoint

In kidney allografts, T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) is characterized by infiltration of the interstitium by T cells and macrophages, intense IFNG and TGFB effects, and epithelial deterioration. Recent experimental and clinical studies provide the basis for a provisional model for TCMR. The model proposes that the major unit of cognate recognition in TCMR is effector T cells engaging donor antigen on macrophages. This event creates the inflammatory compartment that recruits effector and effector memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, both cognate and noncognate, and macrophage precursors. Cognate T cells cross the donor microcirculation to enter the interstitium but spare the microcirculation. Local inflammation triggers dedifferentiation of the adjacent epithelium (e.g. loss of transporters and expression of embryonic genes) rather than cell death, via mechanisms that do not require known T‐cell cytotoxic mechanisms or direct contact of T cells with the epithelium. Local epithelial changes trigger a response of the entire nephron and a second wave of dedifferentiation. The dedifferentiated epithelium is unable to exclude T cells, which enter to produce tubulitis lesions. Thus TCMR is a cognate recognition‐based process that creates local inflammation and epithelial dedifferentiation, stereotyped nephron responses, and tubulitis, and if untreated causes irreversible nephron loss.     

IFN-γ Prevents Early Perforin-Granzyme-Mediated Destruction of Kidney Allografts by Inducing Donor Class I Products in the Kidney

Interferon-γ (Ifng) protects organ allografts: mouse kidney allografts lacking Ifng receptors rapidly fail with massive ischemic necrosis around days 5 to 7, reflecting microcirculation failure. We hypothesized that Ifng protects the graft by preventing perforin-granzyme-mediated cytotoxic damage to the microcirculation by inducing class Ia and/or Ib products. We transplanted kidney allografts lacking Ifng receptors into various knockout hosts. The necrosis/congestion phenotype did not require host B cells or IL-4 and IL-13 receptors, but required the T-cell alloresponse: it did not occur if the hosts were syngeneic or T-cell deficient. However, host perforin-granzyme mechanisms were required: no necrosis developed if hosts lacked either perforin or granzymes A and B. The ability of Ifng to protect the allograft required donor class I products: allografts lacking class I products due to Tap1 or β2 microglobulin deficiency developed a similar necrosis-congestion phenotype at day 7 despite Ifng receptors being present. Thus when host cytotoxic T cells infiltrate organ allografts, Ifng prevents their perforin-granzyme mechanism from compromising the microcirculation by a mechanism requiring donor class Ia or Ib products. We propose that donor class Ia or Ib products are needed to trigger inhibitory receptors on effector T cells.     

Acute Humoral Rejection in an ABO Compatible Combined Liver–Kidney Transplant—The Kidney Is Not Always Protected

Combined liver–kidney transplantation has become a common practice for the treatment of patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease and end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation in the setting of multiorgan transplantation is thought to have a protective effect against humoral rejection even when a positive crossmatch is obtained prior to surgery. In most centers, a pre liver–kidney transplant crossmatch is rarely performed because of the known immunoprotective effect of the liver allograft. In this report, a case of acute humoral rejection in the kidney allograft after a combined liver–kidney transplant is described. Although humoral rejection was treated using plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, the kidney required 3 months to recover function and finally progressed to chronic allograft nephropathy. A heightened index of suspicion for acute humoral rejection of the renal allograft is necessary when performing combined liver–kidney transplants to highly sensitized patients due to previous organ transplants.     

Chronic Humoral Rejection of Human Kidney Allografts Is Associated with MMP‐2 Accumulation in Podocytes and its Release in the Urine

Chronic humoral rejection (CHR) is an important cause of late graft failures following kidney transplantation. Overall, the pathophysiology of CHR is poorly understood. Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2), a type IV collagenase, has been implicated in chronic kidney disease and allograft rejection in previous studies. We examined the presence of MMP‐2 in allograft biopsies and in the urine of kidney transplant recipients with CHR. MMP‐2 staining was detected by immunohistochemistry in podocytes for all CHR patients but less frequently in patients with other renal complications. Urinary MMP‐2 levels were also significantly higher in CHR patients (median 4942 pg/mL, N = 27) compared to non‐CHR patients (median 598 pg/mL, N = 65; p < 0.001). Elevated urinary MMP‐2 correlated with higher levels of proteinuria in both CHR and non‐CHR patients. Longitudinal analysis indicated that increase in urine MMP‐2 coincided with initial diagnosis of CHR as documented by the biopsies. Using an enzymatic assay, we demonstrated that MMP‐2 was present in its active form in the urine of patients with CHR. Overall, our findings associate MMP‐2 with glomerular injury as well as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy observed in patients with CHR.     

Molecular Diagnosis of T Cell‐Mediated Rejection in Human Kidney Transplant Biopsies

Histologic diagnosis of T cell‐mediated rejection is flawed by subjective assessments, nonspecific lesions and arbitrary rules. This study developed a molecular test for T cell‐mediated rejection. We used microarray results from 403 kidney transplant biopsies to derive a classifier assigning T cell‐mediated rejection scores to all biopsies, and compared these with histologic assessments. The score correlated with histologic lesions of T cell‐mediated rejection (infiltrate, tubulitis). The accuracy of the classifier for the histology diagnoses was 89%. Very high and low molecular scores corresponded with unanimity among three pathologists on the presence or absence of T cell‐mediated rejection, respectively. The molecular score had low sensitivity (50%) and positive predictive value (62%) for the histology diagnoses. However, histology showed similar disagreement between pathologists—only 45–56% sensitivity of one pathologist with diagnoses of T cell‐mediated rejection by another. Discrepancies between molecular scores and histology were mostly when histology was ambiguous (“borderline”) or unreliable, e.g. in cases with scarring or inflammation induced by tissue injury. Vasculitis (isolated v‐lesion TCMR) was particularly discrepant, with most cases exhibiting low TCMR scores. We propose new rules to integrate molecular tests and histology into a precision diagnostic system that can reduce errors, ambiguity and interpathologist disagreement.     

Anti‐huCD20 Antibody Therapy for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts in a Mouse Model

We have reported that B6.CCR5^?/? mice reject renal allografts with high serum donor‐specific antibody (DSA) titers and marked C4d deposition in grafts, features consistent with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). B6.huCD20/CCR5^?/? mice, where human CD20 expression is restricted to B cells, rejected A/J renal allografts by day 26 posttransplant with DSA first detected in serum on day 5 posttransplant and increased thereafter. Recipient treatment with anti‐huCD20 mAb prior to the transplant and weekly up to 7 weeks posttransplant promoted long‐term allograft survival (>100 days) with low DSA titers. To investigate the effect of B cell depletion at the time serum DSA was first detected, recipients were treated with anti‐huCD20 mAb on days 5, 8, and 12 posttransplant. This regimen significantly reduced DSA titers and graft inflammation on day 15 posttransplant and prolonged allograft survival >60 days. However, DSA returned to the titers observed in control treated recipients by day 30 posttransplant and histological analyses on day 60 posttransplant indicated severe interstitial fibrosis. These results indicate that anti‐huCD20 mAb had the greatest effect as a prophylactic treatment and that the distinct kinetics of DSA responses accounts for acute renal allograft failure versus the development of fibrosis.

     

Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Single Class I MHC‐Disparate Cardiac Allografts

Murine CCR5^?/? recipients produce high titers of antibody to complete MHC‐mismatched heart and renal allografts. To study mechanisms of class I MHC antibody‐mediated allograft injury, we tested the rejection of heart allografts transgenically expressing a single class I MHC disparity in wild‐type C57BL/6 (H‐2^b) and B6.CCR5^?/? recipients. Donor‐specific antibody titers in CCR5^?/? recipients were 30‐fold higher than in wild‐type recipients. B6.K^d allografts survived longer than 60 days in wild‐type recipients whereas CCR5^?/? recipients rejected all allografts within 14 days. Rejection was accompanied by infiltration of CD8 T cells, neutrophils and macrophages, and C4d deposition in the graft capillaries. B6.K^d allografts were rejected by CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/?, but not μMT^?/?/CCR5^?/?, recipients indicating the need for antibody but not CD8 T cells. Grafts recovered at day 10 from CCR5^?/? and CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/? recipients and from RAG‐1^?/? allograft recipients injected with anti‐K^d antibodies expressed high levels of perforin, myeloperoxidase and CCL5 mRNA. These studies indicate that the continual production of antidonor class I MHC antibody can mediate allograft rejection, that donor‐reactive CD8 T cells synergize with the antibody to contribute to rejection, and that expression of three biomarkers during rejection can occur in the absence of this CD8 T cell activity.     

Identifying Subphenotypes of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplants

The key lesions in antibody‐mediated kidney transplant rejection (ABMR) are microcirculation inflammation (peritubular capillaritis and/or glomerulitis lesions, abbreviated “pg”) and glomerular double contours (cg lesions). We used these features to explore subphenotypes in 164 indication biopsies with ABMR‐related diagnoses: 137 ABMR (109 pure and 28 mixed with T cell–mediated rejection [TCMR]) and 27 transplant glomerulopathy (TG), identified from prospective multicenter studies. The lesions indicated three ABMR subphenotypes: pgABMR, cgABMR, and pgcgABMR. Principal component analysis confirmed these subphenotypes and showed that TG can be reclassified as pgcgABMR (n = 17) or cgABMR (n = 10). ABMR‐related biopsies included 45 pgABMR, 90 pgcgABMR, and 25 cgABMR, with four unclassifiable. Dominating all time intervals was the subphenotype pgcgABMR. The pgABMR subphenotype presented earliest (median <2 years), frequently mixed with TCMR, and was most associated with nonadherence. The cgABMR subphenotype presented late (median 9 years). Subphenotypes differed in their molecular changes, with pgABMR having the most histologic–molecular discrepancies (i.e. potential errors). Donor‐specific antibody (DSA) was not identified in 29% of pgcgABMR and 46% of cgABMR, but failure rates and molecular findings were similar to cases where DSA was known to be positive. Thus, ABMR presents distinct subphenotypes, early pg‐dominant, late cg‐dominant, and combined pgcg phenotype, differing in time, molecular features, accompanying TCMR, HLA antibody, and probability of nonadherence.     

Urinary miR‐210 as a Mediator of Acute T‐Cell Mediated Rejection in Renal Allograft Recipients

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ribonucleotides regulating gene expression. Circulating miRNAs are remarkably stable in the blood. We tested whether miRNAs are also detectable in urine and may serve as new predictors of outcome in renal transplant patients with acute rejection. We profiled urinary miRNAs of stable transplant patients and transplant patients with acute rejection. The miR‐10a, miR‐10b and miR‐210 were strongly deregulated in urine of the patients with acute rejection. We confirmed these data in urine of a validation cohort of 62 patients with acute rejection, 19 control transplant patients without rejection and 13 stable transplant patients with urinary tract infection by quantitative RT‐PCR. The miR‐10b and miR‐210 were downregulated and miR‐10a upregulated in patients with acute rejection compared to controls. Only miR‐210 differed between patients with acute rejection when compared to stable transplant patients with urinary tract infection or transplant patients before/after rejection. Low miR‐210 levels were associated with higher decline in GFR 1 year after transplantation. Selected miRNAs are strongly altered in urine of the patients with acute renal allograft rejection. The miR‐210 levels identify patients with acute rejection and predict long‐term kidney function. Urinary miR‐210 may thus serve as a novel biomarker of acute kidney rejection.     

Proliferation of CD8‐Positive T Cells in Blood Vessels of Rat Renal Allografts

It is still disputed in which anatomical compartments of allograft recipients T‐cells proliferate. After experimental renal transplantation, host monocytes and lymphocytes accumulate in the lumina of graft blood vessels. In this study, we test the hypothesis that T lymphocytes proliferate in the vascular bed of the graft. Kidneys were transplanted in the Dark Agouti to Lewis rat strain combination, an established experimental model for acute rejection. Isogeneic transplantation was performed as a control. Cells in the S‐phase of mitosis were detected in situ three days posttransplantation by pulse‐labeling with BrdU and by immunohistochemical detection of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). More than 20% of all T‐cells in the lumina of allograft blood vessels incorporated BrdU and approximately 30% of them expressed PCNA. In the blood vessels of isografts as well as in other organs of allograft recipients, only few BrdU⁺ cells were detected. A majority of the BrdU⁺ cells in graft blood vessels expressed CD8. In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD8⁺ T lymphocytes proliferate in the lumina of the blood vessels of renal allografts during the onset of acute rejection.     

IL‐17 Expression by Tubular Epithelial Cells in Renal Transplant Recipients with Acute Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

Acute rejection is still a common complication of kidney transplantation. IL‐17 is known to be associated with allograft rejection but the cellular source and the role of this cytokine remains unclear. We investigated IL‐17 graft expression in renal transplant recipients with acute antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR), acute T‐cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and acute tubular damage due to calcineurin‐inhibitor toxicity (CNI). In acute ABMR, tubular IL‐17 protein expression was significantly increased compared to TCMR, where most of the IL‐17⁺cells were CD4⁺graft infiltrating lymphocytes, IFTA and CNI control groups. The tubular expression of IL‐17 in acute ABMR colocalized with JAK2 phosphorylation and peritubular capillaries C4d deposition. In addition, IL‐17 tubular expression was directly and significantly correlated with the extension of C4d deposits. In cultured proximal tubular cells, C3a induced IL‐17 gene and protein expression along with an increased in JAK2 phosphorylation. The inhibition of JAK2 abolished C3a‐induced IL‐17 expression. The use of steroids and monoclonal antibodies reduced IL‐17 expression, JAK2 phosphorylation and C4d deposition in acute ABMR patients. Our data suggest that tubular cells represent a significant source of IL‐17 in ABMR and this event might be mediated by the complement system activation featuring this condition.     

Posttransplant De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies Identify Pediatric Kidney Recipients at Risk for Late Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

The emerging role of humoral immunity in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft damage has prompted research aimed at assessing the role of anti‐HLA antibody (Ab) monitoring as a tool to predict allograft outcome. Data on the natural history of allografts in children developing de novo Ab after transplantation are limited. Utilizing sera collected pretransplant, and serially posttransplant, we retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients, without pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), for de novo Ab occurrence, and compared results with clinical–pathologic data. At 4.3‐year follow up, 19 patients (23%) developed de novo DSA whereas 24 had de novo non‐DSA (NDSA, 29%). DSA appeared at a median time of 24 months after transplantation and were mostly directed to HLA‐DQ antigens. Among the 82 patients, eight developed late/chronic active C4d+ antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), and four C4d‐negative AMR. Late AMR correlated with DSA (p < 0.01), whose development preceded AMR by 1‐year median time. Patients with DSA had a median serum creatinine of 1.44 mg/dL at follow up, significantly higher than NDSA and Ab‐negative patients (p < 0.005). In our pediatric cohort, DSA identify patients at risk of renal dysfunction, AMR and graft loss; treatment started at Ab emergence might prevent AMR occurrence and/or progression to graft failure.     

The possible critical role of T‐cell help in DSA‐mediated graft loss

In this review, we discuss a possible central role of T‐cell help in severe forms of graft damage mediated by donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA). Some kidney transplant recipients with pretransplant DSA show a high graft failure rate, whereas in other patients DSA do not harm the transplanted kidney and in most cases, disappear shortly after transplantation. Analyzing 80 desensitized highly immunized kidney transplant recipients and another multicenter cohort of 385 patients with pretransplant HLA antibodies, we reported recently that an ongoing T‐cell help from an activated immune system, as measured by an increased level of soluble CD30 in serum, might be necessary for the DSA to exert a deleterious effect. Patients positive for both pretransplant DSA and sCD30 appear to require special measures, such as the elimination of DSA from the circulation, potent immunosuppression, good HLA‐matching, and intense post‐transplant monitoring, whereas exclusion of DSA‐positive patients from transplantation in the absence of high sCD30 may not be justified in all cases, even if the pretransplant DSA are strong and complement‐activating.