Effects of biofeedback on obstructive defecation--reconditioning of the defecation reflex?

Twenty two patients with obstructive defecation were recruited for relaxation training by domiciliary self regulatory biofeedback. Each patient served as his or her own control for anorectal and proctographic assessments. Biofeedback training improved the obstructive symptoms of the patients and showed significant change in various parameters related to the obstructive defecation syndrome. As examined by isotope dynamic proctography: the defecation rate (% of evacuation/defecation time) was significantly increased (p < 0.05), the anorectal angles at rest and during attempted defecation were made more obtuse (p < 0.05), and the pelvic floor movements were made more dynamic on voluntary contraction of the anal sphincter (p < 0.03). The external anal sphincter electromyographic voltage recorded during defecation was significantly reduced (p < 0.0005) as was the surface anal plug electromyographic electrode voltage (p < 0.0001), which was associated with a greatly reduced anismus index (p < 0.0001). The rectal sensation was improved (p < 0.05), concomitantly. Biofeedback thus improves the defecation act in patients suffering from inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor and sphincter musculature. Furthermore, this study has shown that biofeedback objectively influences the defecation reflex leading to an improved quality of higher control of bowel function.     

Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback.

Fifteen subjects presenting with intractable constipation due to obstructive defecation, mean (SEM) duration 8.8 (1.8) years, had the inappropriate contraction and electromyographic changes in the pelvic floor muscles and external and sphincter typical of this condition. An electromyographically derived index was used to grade its severity. A self applied biofeedback device was used to allow electromyographic recording of the abnormal external anal sphincter. The subjects were encouraged to reduce the abnormal electromyographic activity on straining after instruction and training. The procedure was intended as a relearning process in which the non-relaxing activity of the pelvic floor was gradually suppressed. Biofeedback training was maintained on a domiciliary basis for a mean time of 3.1 weeks and resulted in a significant reduction in the anismus index (mean (SEM) 69.9 (7.8)% before biofeedback, mean 14 (3.9)% after biofeedback, p less than 0.01). There was an associated reduction in the time spent straining at stool and in the difficulty of defecation and an increased frequency of defecation. Defecatory video proctograms in six subjects showed improvements in the anorectal angle during straining and evacuation. The clinical benefit to the patients persisted after a mean follow up of 6.2 months.     

Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructed defecation if it is not associated with anismus

PURPOSE: Rectocele is often associated with anorectal symptoms. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair the rectocele. The surgical results are variable. This study evaluated the results of transanal repair of rectocele, with particular emphasis on the impact of concomitant anismus on postoperative functional outcome. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive females who underwent transanal repair of rectocele for obstructed defecation were prospectively reviewed. All 59 patients were parous with a median parity of 2 (range, 1–6) and a median age of 58 (range, 46–68) years. The median length of follow-up was 19 (range, 6–40) months. Anismus was detected by anorectal physiology and defecography. The functional outcome was assessed by a standard questionnaire, physical examination, anorectal manometry, neurophysiology, and defecography. The quality-of-life index was obtained using a visual analog scale (from 1–10, with 10 being the best). RESULTS: The functional outcome of transanal repair of rectocele was superior in patients without anismus. Forty (93 percent) of the 43 patients without anismus showed improved evacuation after repair compared with 6 (38 percent) of the 16 patients with anismus (P<0.05). The quality-of-life index improved (9vs. 4) if anismus was not present (P<0.05). There were minimal complications. Hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (2 units) occurred in one patient and urinary retention in another. CONCLUSION: Transanal repair of rectocele is safe and, in the absence of anismus, effectively corrects obstructed defecation.Supported in part by the Stewardson Charitable Trusts.Presented at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress, Sydney, Australia, May 3 to 8, 1998.     

Anismus: Fact or fiction?

PURPOSE: Although anismus has been considered to be the principal cause of anorectal outlet obstruction, it is doubtful whether contraction of the puborectalis muscle during straining is paradoxical. The present study was conducted to answer this question. METHODS: During the first part of the study, we retrospectively reviewed 121 patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation (male:female, 10/111; median age, 51 years). All of these patients underwent electromyography (EMG) of the pelvic floor and the balloon expulsion test (BET) in the left lateral position. Evacuation proctography was performed in all of these patients in the sitting position. Both the posterior anorectal angle and the central anorectal angle were measured. EMG and BET were also performed in ten controls (male:female, 4/6; median age, 47). In 147 patients with fecal incontinence (male:female, 24/123; median age, 58) only EMG activity was recorded. Criteria for anismus during straining were increase or insufficient (<20 percent) decrease of EMG activity, failure to expel an air-filled balloon on BET, and decrease or insufficient (<5 percent) increase of anorectal angle on evacuation proctography. Between June 1994 and March 1995, we conducted a second prospective study in a consecutive series of 49 patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation and 28 patients with fecal incontinence. Both groups were compared with 19 control subjects. In this study, all three tests were performed. EMG and BET were performed both in the left lateral position and in the sitting position. RESULTS: The retrospective study was undertaken by comparing the constipated patients with the incontinent patients and the controls, and the anismus detected by EMG was found in, respectively, 60, 46, and 60 percent. Failure to expel the air-filled balloon was observed in 80 constipated patients (66 percent) and in 9 control subjects (90 percent). Based on posterior anorectal angle and central anorectal angle measurements, anismus was diagnosed in, respectively, 21 and 35 percent of constipated patients. In the prospective study, none of the tests showed significant differences regarding the prevalence of anismus between the two subgroups of patients and the control subjects. The prevalence of anismus only differed between constipated and incontinent patients when the diagnosis was based on BET in the sitting position (67 vs.32 percent;P <0.005). Our study shows that contraction of the puborectalis muscle during straining is not exclusively found in patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation. The three tests most commonly used for the diagnosis of anismus showed an extremely poor agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we doubt the clinical significance of anismus.     

Lack of correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis

Chronic constipation is an extremely common problem in children. Many authors have advocated using anorectal manometric examination during evaluation of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis as a means of developing individualized modes of treatment. PURPOSE: This study was designed to prospectively examine frequency and severity of symptoms of childhood constipation and encopresis and associate these symptoms with anorectal manometric findings. METHODS: Forty-four children with chronic constipation participated in the study. Before performing anorectal manometry, bowel-related symptoms were collected for two consecutive weeks with a computerized voice mail system. Anorectal manometry was performed using a triple lumen catheter attached to a hydraulic manometry infusion system. RESULTS: Frequency of voluntary bowel movements did not correlate with any manometric parameters. Frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset of symptoms, and duration of symptoms were all highly correlated with degree of sphincter spasm during attempted defecation; however, none of these variables correlated with any other manometric parameter. Amount of pain associated with bowel movements correlated with frequency of soiling and was inversely correlated with maximum squeeze pressure but was not correlated with any other manometric parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In children with chronic constipation and encopresis, sphincter spasm demonstrated with anorectal manometry is highly correlated with frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset, and duration of symptoms; however, none of the other commonly measured manometric parameters appear to correlate with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis.Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 HD 28160.     

Functional anorectal disorders

This report defines criteria for diagnosing functional anorectal disorders (ie, fecal incontinence, anorectal pain, and disorders of defecation). Functional fecal incontinence is defined as the uncontrolled passage of fecal material recurring for > or =3 months in an individual with a developmental age of > or =4 years that is associated with: (1) abnormal functioning of normally innervated and structurally intact muscles, and/or (2) no or minor abnormalities of sphincter structure and/or innervation insufficient to explain fecal incontinence, and/or (3) normal or disordered bowel habits (ie, fecal retention or diarrhea), and/or (4) psychological causes. However, conditions wherein structural and/or neurogenic abnormalities explain the symptom, or are part of a generalized process (eg, diabetic neuropathy) are not included within functional fecal incontinence. Functional fecal incontinence is a common, but underrecognized symptom, which is equally prevalent in men and women, and can often cause considerable distress. The clinical features are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Functional anorectal pain syndromes include proctalgia fugax (fleeting pain) and chronic proctalgia; chronic proctalgia may be subdivided into levator ani syndrome and unspecified anorectal pain, which are defined by arbitrary clinical criteria. Functional defecation disorders are characterized by 2 or more symptoms of constipation, with > or =2 of the following features during defecation: impaired evacuation, inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, and inadequate propulsive forces. Functional disorders of defecation may be amenable to pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy (such as dyssynergic defecation).     

PEG 3350 (Transipeg) versus lactulose in the treatment of childhood functional constipation: a double blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND: Recently, polyethylene glycol (PEG 3350) has been suggested as a good alternative laxative to lactulose as a treatment option in paediatric constipation. However, no large randomised controlled trials exist evaluating the efficacy of either laxative. AIMS: To compare PEG 3350 (Transipeg: polyethylene glycol with electrolytes) with lactulose in paediatric constipation and evaluate clinical efficacy/side effects. PATIENTS: One hundred patients (aged 6 months-15 years) with paediatric constipation were included in an eight week double blinded, randomised, controlled trial. METHODS: After faecal disimpaction, patients <6 years of age received PEG 3350 (2.95 g/sachet) or lactulose (6 g/sachet) while children > or =6 years started with 2 sachets/day. Primary outcome measures were: defecation and encopresis frequency/week and successful treatment after eight weeks. Success was defined as a defecation frequency > or =3/week and encopresis < or =1 every two weeks. Secondary outcome measures were side effects after eight weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients (49 male) completed the study. A significant increase in defecation frequency (PEG 3350: 3 pre v 7 post treatment/week; lactulose: 3 pre v 6 post/week) and a significant decrease in encopresis frequency (PEG 3350: 10 pre v 3 post/week; lactulose: 8 pre v 3 post/week) was found in both groups (NS). However, success was significantly higher in the PEG group (56%) compared with the lactulose group (29%). PEG 3350 patients reported less abdominal pain, straining, and pain at defecation than children using lactulose. However, bad taste was reported significantly more often in the PEG group. CONCLUSIONS: PEG 3350 (0.26 (0.11) g/kg), compared with lactulose (0.66 (0.32) g/kg), provided a higher success rate with fewer side effects. PEG 3350 should be the laxative of first choice in childhood constipation.     

Anismus: a marker of multi-site functional disorders?

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical significance of anismus in patients who complain of constipation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty control subjects and 93 consecutive patients complaining of functional constipation took part in the study. Colonic transit time study and anorectal manometry were performed. Questions about depression and urinary and sexual diseases were added to a questionnaire based on the Rome II criteria, and visual analog scales about four items (constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal bloating and abdominal pain). RESULTS: Constipated patients have lower threshold sensation volume, lower constant sensation volume, and lower maximum tolerable volume than controls. Thirty-seven patients (40%) were found to have anismus, based on anorectal manometry. No significant difference was found between constipated patients with anismus and constipated patients without anismus, using anorectal manometry. Constipated patients had longer colorectal transit time than controls, but neither total nor segmental colonic transit time was correlated with the presence or absence of anismus. In patients with anismus, a higher frequency of oesophageal symptoms, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, aerophagia, functional bowel disorders, functional abdominal pain, soiling, and dyschezia was found. In addition, a higher frequency of urinary complaints, sexual complaints, and depression was found. Anismus was associated with increased awareness of constipation, abdominal bloating, and abdominal pain, but not with diarrhoea.     

Abnormal rectoanal function in children recovered from chronic constipation and encopresis

It is unknown if abnormal anal sphincter function as assessed by anorectal manometry is still present years after resolution of chronic constipation and encopresis. Twenty healthy controls, 12 children with constipation but no encopresis, and 20 children with chronic constipation and encopresis underwent anorectal manometric testing, using intraluminal pressure transducers and a balloon for rectal distention. Anorectal measurements were repeated in the 20 constipated and encopretic children 2.5-4 yr after treatment began; 11 children had recovered for at least 1 yr. The mean values of anal resting tone and of anal pull-through pressure were lower in the constipated and encopretic children than in the 20 control children (p less than 0.003). Percent relaxation of the rectosphincteric reflex after rectal distention of 30 and 60 ml was lower in constipated children with and without encopresis than in controls (p less than 0.003), whereas the means of rectosphincteric reflex threshold were comparable in the three groups of children. Three years after initiation of treatment with milk of magnesia, high-fiber diet, and bowel training techniques, the mean values of anal resting tone, anal pull-through pressure, and percent relaxation of rectosphincteric reflex remained significantly lower in both recovered and nonrecovered constipated and encopretic patients compared with controls. It was suggested that the underlying cause of chronic constipation is the decreased ability of the internal anal sphincter to relax with rectal distention, and the hypotonia of the anal canal is responsible for the encopresis. Abnormal anorectal functions were still present years after cessation of treatment and recovery and put the recovered patient at risk for recurrence of chronic constipation and encopresis.     

Obstipation

Constipation is a common problem that is associated with many diseases and can be caused by structural or functional pathology of the colon and rectum. It affects quality of life and results in substantial costs. Depending on the patient’s symptoms and clinical presentation, secondary causes of constipation (e.g., anorectal cancer) must be ruled out. Imaging procedures and anorectal function tests are used to differentiate slow-transit constipation from dyssynergic defecation (anismus), structural outlet obstruction (e.g., intussusception), and irritable bowel syndrome. Patients with chronic functional constipation often respond to dietary and lifestyle modification, bulking agents, and laxatives. The effects of lactulose and polyethylene glycol have been established in randomized controlled trials. With regulatory approval of lubiprostone and methylnaltrexone in Europe, new medications for the treatment of slow-transit constipation will soon become available. Biofeedback therapy is the treatment of choice in patients with anismus and in selected patients with outlet obstruction or abnormal anorectal sensitivity. In refractory cases, surgery may be indicated.     

Persistence of chronic constipation in children after biofeedback treatment

We investigated the efficacy of biofeedback treatment and evaluated anorectal factors that might be responsible for persistence of chronic constipation with or without encopresis in a group of 38 children with abnormal contraction of the pelvic floor during straining and persistence of chronic constipation with encopresis after conventional treatment. Nine children were unsuccessful in learning to relax the pelvic floor during straining with biofeedback treatment, and one patient had contraction of the pelvic floor on follow-up despite successful biofeedback treatment; none recovered. Twenty-eight children were able to relax the pelvic floor on follow-up; 14 recovered and 14 did not recover from chronic constipation. Nonrecovered patients who learned to relax the pelvic floor had significantly decreased rectal and anal responsiveness to rectal distension as compared to recovered patients during the initial and follow-up anorectal manometric study. Psychological factors such as social competence and behavior problems did not appear to be responsible for recovery or nonrecovery from chronic constipation and encopresis.This work was supported by grant M01-RR-00069 from the General Clinical Research Center Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.Results of this study were published in part as an abstract inJournal of Gastrointestinal Motility 1:69, 1989; and presented at the 12th International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility, Gmunden, Austria, September 13, 1989.     

Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although obstructed defecation is generally attributed to pelvic floor dyssynergia, clinical observations suggest a wider spectrum of anorectal disturbances. Our aim was to characterize phenotypic variability in constipated patients by anorectal assessments. METHODS: Anal pressures, rectal balloon expulsion, rectal sensation, and pelvic floor structure (by endoanal magnetic resonance imaging) and motion (by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging) were assessed in 52 constipated women and 41 age-matched asymptomatic women. Phenotypes were characterized in patients by principal components analysis of these measurements. RESULTS: Among patients, 16 had a hypertensive anal sphincter, 41 had an abnormal rectal balloon expulsion test, and 20 had abnormal rectal sensation. Forty-nine patients (94%) had abnormal pelvic floor motion during evacuation and/or squeeze. After correcting for age and body mass index, 3 principal components explained 71% of variance between patients. These factors were weighted most strongly by perineal descent during evacuation (factor 1), anorectal location at rest (factor 2), and anal resting pressure (factor 3). Factors 1 and 3 discriminated between controls and patients. Compared with patients with normal (n = 23) or reduced (n = 18) perineal descent, patients with increased (n = 11) descent were more likely (P < or = .01) to be obese, have an anal resting pressure >90 mm Hg, and have a normal rectal balloon expulsion test result. CONCLUSIONS: These observations demonstrate that functional defecation disorders comprise a heterogeneous entity that can be subcharacterized by perineal descent during defecation, perineal location at rest, and anal resting pressure. Further studies are needed to ascertain if the phenotypes reflect differences in the natural history of these disorders.     

Gastrointestinal transit and anorectal manometry in children with colonic substance P deficiency

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Severe intractable constipation in children may be associated with a reduction of substance P (SP)- containing fibers in colonic circular muscle. The aim of this study was to characterize gastrointestinal transit (GIT), anorectal manometry (ARM) and electromyographic (EMG) changes in these children. METHODS: Seromuscular laparoscopic biopsies of the colon were obtained from 35 children with severe constipation. Immunofluorescent staining for SP and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) were then performed on these specimens. The cohort of patients studied included a SP-deficient group (SPD, n = 25) who had reduced numbers of SP-immunoreactive nerve fibers. The other group consisted of patients with normal staining for both SP and VIP (SPN, n = 10). Gastrointestinal transit studies (gastric emptying, orocecal and colonic transit) suitable for analysis were available for 17 patients (SPD, n = 9 and SPN, n = 8). The colon was divided into segments and radioactivity counts in each segment were expressed as a percentage of the total colonic count at each time point (6, 24, 32 and 48 h). The geometric center (GC), ARM, EMG, clinical and demographic data characteristics of both groups of patients were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data, gastric emptying, orocecal transit or geometric center of transit in the colon between the two patient groups. The ARM and EMG studies suggested that the SPN group have a higher mean threshold volume of balloon distension required to initiate a rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and a higher incidence of anismus; however, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a trend that the SPN patients have a greater problem with obstructive defecation and abnormal rectal sensation than those with SPD. We were unable to confirm any defect in colonic transit in the SPD patients compared with the SPN group.     

Combined vertical reduction rectoplasty and sacral nerve stimulation for rectal evacuatory dysfunction and faecal incontinence associated with previous anorectal malformation

Functional outcomes following surgery for anorectal malformation are variable, with many children experiencing persisting anorectal dysfunction. We describe a 34-year-old female with previous vestibular fistula who experienced lifelong rectal evacuatory dysfunction and faecal incontinence; she was treated in a two stage process producing efficient defecation and almost total continence.     

Defecation 1: Testing a hypothesis for pelvic striated muscle action to open the anorectum

Background

We conducted an observational study to assess the hypothesis that the pelvic muscles actively open the anorectal lumen during defecation.

Methods

Three groups of female patients were evaluated with video imaging studies of defecation using a grid or bony reference points. Eight patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence had video myogram defecography; eight with obstructive defecation had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defecating proctograms; and four normal patients had video X-ray or MRI defecating proctogram studies.

Results

In all three groups, the anorectum was stretched bidirectionally by three directional muscle force vectors acting on the walls of the rectum, effectively doubling the diameter of the rectum during defecation. The anterior rectal wall was pulled forwards, and the posterior wall backwards and downwards opening the anorectal angle, associated with angulation of the anterior tip of the levator plate (LP). These observations are consistent with a staged relaxation of some parts of the pelvic floor during defecation, and contraction of others. First, the puborectalis muscle relaxes. Puborectalis muscle relaxation frees the posterior rectal wall so that it can be stretched and opened by contraction of the LP and conjoint longitudinal muscle of the anus. Second, contraction of the pubococcygeus muscle pulls forward the anterior rectal wall, further increasing the diameter of the rectum. Third, when the bolus has entered the rectum, the external anal sphincter relaxes, and the rectum contracts to expel the fecal bolus.

Conclusions

Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that pelvic striated muscle actively opens the rectal lumen, thereby reducing internal anorectal resistance to expulsion of feces. Controlled studies of electromyographic activity would be useful to further test this hypothesis.     

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in 102 patients: Do different phenotypes make sense?

BackgroundLittle is known about the pathophysiological mechanisms of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS).AimsWe aim to identify the different phenotypes, taking into account complaints, anatomy and anorectal physiology.MethodsComplaints, endoscopy results, and physiology data of patients with histologically proven SRUS were collected and analysed. The associated anorectal diseases were faecal incontinence and obstructed defecation. The clinical aspects of SRUS were compared, and factors associated with anorectal diseases were identified.ResultsOverall, 102 consecutive patients were included. The predominant lesion was a rectal ulcer (66%), and inflammation of the rectal wall was present in 42% of patients. Abnormal rectal capacities and/or rectal perception was observed in more than half. Nearly half (52%) of the patients met the criteria for obstructed defecation and they tended to more frequently have psychiatric disease (66.7% vs 33.3%; p=0.07). Patients with faecal incontinence (17%) reported more self-perception of anal procidentia (p=0.01) and were more likely to have inflammation of the rectal wall (p=0.02), high-grade internal rectal procidentia (p=0.06) and anal hypotonia (p=0.004); their maximum tolerable volume was lower (p=0.004).ConclusionThe characteristics of patients with SRUS suggest different phenotypes. This may be a way to develop a comprehensive treatment strategy.     

Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management

Constipation is a subjective symptom of various pathological conditions. Incidence of constipation fluctuates from 2 to 30% in the general population. Approximately 50% of constipated patients referred to tertiary care centers have obstructed defecation constipation. Constipation of obstructed defecation may be due to mechanical causes or functional disorders of the anorectal region. Mechanical causes are related to morphological abnormalities of the anorectum (megarectum, rectal prolapse, rectocele, enterocele, neoplasms, stenosis). Functional disorders are associated with neurological disorders and dysfunction of the pelvic floor muscles or anorectal muscles (anismus, descending perineum syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease). However, this type of constipation should be differentiated by colonic slow transit constipation which, if coexists, should be managed to a second time. Assessment of patients with severe constipation includes a good history, physical examination and specialized investigations (colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion test, defecography, electromyography), which contribute to the diagnosis and the differential diagnosis of the cause of the obstructed defecation. Thereby, constipated patients can be given appropriate treatment for their problem, which may be conservative (bulk agents, high-fiber diet or laxatives), biofeedback training or surgery.     

Anorectal manometric abnormalities and effect of cisapride in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation

OBJECTIVES : To investigate abnormalities in anorectal motility, changes in rectal visceral perception of balloon distention and the effect of cisapride on patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). METHODS : Anorectal manometry was carried out in 30 CIC patients using the Synectics Visceral Stimulator combined with PcPolygraf before and after treatment with cisapride (10 mg three times daily for 4 weeks). Twenty age‐matched controls were also studied before cisapride therapy. RESULTS : Patients with CIC had lower anorectal sphincter squeeze pressures (P < 0.05), larger minimum relaxation volumes necessary to elicit the anorectal inhibitory reflux (P < 0.05), higher rectal defecation volume thresholds and higher rectal maximum tolerable volume thresholds (P < 0.01) compared with the controls. All of the abnormalities significantly improved and defecation frequency greatly increased after 4 weeks of cisapride therapy (P < 0.01). Cisapride was effective in 46.67% of patients with CIC. CONCLUSIONS : Patients with CIC have abnormalities of both anorectal motility and rectal visceral perception of balloon distention. Cisapride can improve these abnormalities and is effective in approximately one‐half of CIC cases.     

Dynamic Graciloplasty in Patients Born With an Anorectal Malformation

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare long-term results for patients born with an anorectal malformation and fecal incontinence treated with a dynamic graciloplasty with those for the total group of patients undergoing dynamic graciloplasty.METHODS Consecutive patients with fecal incontinence after surgical treatment of anorectal malformation and treated with dynamic graciloplasty were included in this study. Preoperative assessment was performed. Postoperative follow-up consisted of anorectal manometry and registration of defecation frequency, continence scores, and postponement time of defecation.RESULTS Twenty-eight patients with a median age of 25.5 years were included in the study. The median follow-up was 4 years. A high anorectal malformation was present in 89.3 percent of patients. Conventional graciloplasty had been previously performed in 36 percent. All patients were incontinent for stools. Median frequency of defecation was four times/day. Median postponement time of defecation was 0 minutes. Rectoanal inhibition reflex was present in 17 percent of patients. Median preoperative sensory threshold during balloon distention was 30 ml and median maximum urge threshold was 165 ml. Satisfactory continence was reached in 35 percent of patients, however, 7.1 percent of patients gained this continence score by additional bowel irrigation. Twenty-nine percent of patients were incontinent for loose stool, 36 percent were incontinent for formed stool. Satisfactory continence was achieved in only 18 percent of patients with a high anorectal malformation, compared with 100 percent in patients with a low anorectal malformation. In the total group of patients with dynamic graciloplasty, satisfactory continence was obtained in 76 percent. The sensitivity threshold in patients with a successful dynamic graciloplasty was lower than that in patients with a failing dynamic graciloplasty (45 vs. 24 ml, P = 0,06). When we compare median preoperative rectal sensitivity threshold in our study group with that in the total patient group with dynamic graciloplasty, statistical difference was established (P = 0.008). Postponement time (0 to 20 minutes) and anal squeeze pressure (81 to 120 mmHg) increased significantly after surgery. Patients with an anorectal malformation had significantly lower resting and stimulation pressure than that of the total group of patients, but the difference between resting and stimulation pressure in both groups was not significantly different (P = 0.33). The difference between resting and stimulation pressure was not significantly different between anorectal malformation patients with a failing dynamic graciloplasty and patients with a successful dynamic graciloplasty. Complications were noted in 57 percent of patients. Explantation of the dynamic graciloplasty was necessary in 32 percent of patients, mainly because of infection of the implant.CONCLUSIONS Results of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence are reasonable for this specific group of patients with limited treatment options. Despite functional dynamic graciloplasty, the results are worse than those for the total group of patients with dynamic graciloplasty. Rectal sensitivity and type of malformation are prognostic factors for outcome and can be used to select patients for treatment with dynamic graciloplasty, thereby improving treatment outcome.Presented at the meeting of the Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Gastro-Enterologie, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, October 2 to 3, 2003.     

Is anorectal endosonography valuable in dyschesia?

AIMS: Dyschesia can be provoked by inappropriate defecation movements. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate dysfunction of the anal sphincter and/or the musculus (m.) puborectalis in patients with dyschesia using anorectal endosonography. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with a medical history of dyschesia and a control group of 20 healthy subjects underwent linear anorectal endosonography (Toshiba models IUV 5060 and PVL-625 RT). In both groups, the dimensions of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis were measured at rest, and during voluntary squeezing and straining. Statistical analysis was performed within and between the two groups. RESULTS: The anal sphincter became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining (versus the resting state) in 85% of patients but in only 35% of control subjects. Changes in sphincter length were statistically significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients compared with control subjects. The m. puborectalis became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining in 80% of patients but in only 30% of controls. Both the changes in length and thickness of the m. puborectalis were significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients versus control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Linear anorectal endosonography demonstrated incomplete or even absent relaxation of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis during a defecation movement in the majority of our patients with dyschesia. This study highlights the value of this elegant ultrasonographic technique in the diagnosis of "pelvic floor dyssynergia" or "anismus".