Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the incidence of papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at imaging-guided core needle biopsy and the need for surgical excision after a benign diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1374 patients with consecutive suspicious breast lesions that underwent either mammography or sonographically guided large-core needle breast biopsy. Fifty-seven lesions (4%) were classified as papillary lesions. Eleven of the 57 cases were lost to follow-up (n = 6) or had not yet shown 2 years of stability (n = 5) and were excluded from this study. The remaining 46 papillary lesions constitute our study population. RESULTS: Surgical excision was performed in 17 (37%) of 46 papillary lesions. In the group of patients whose lesions were recommended for excision because carcinoma was identified at core biopsy, surgical excision revealed one false-positive and two true-positive diagnoses. In four cases, histologic diagnoses of the excisional biopsy and the core needle biopsy were discordant. One false-positive finding at core needle biopsy initially was interpreted as invasive ductal carcinoma on the basis of core needle biopsy specimens. In three false-negative findings, the initial diagnosis at core needle biopsy was upgraded after surgical excision. Two cases of papilloma with adjacent atypical ductal hyperplasia and one of atypical papilloma were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ after surgical excision. Imaging follow-up was performed in the remaining 29 patients. All lesions were stable or had decreased in size during the 2-year follow-up period. The negative predictive value of core needle biopsy for excluding malignancy among the papillary lesions diagnosed in our study was 93%. CONCLUSION: When the histologic diagnosis is benign, our data suggest that papillary lesions may be safely managed with imaging follow-up rather than with surgical excision. However, atypical papillary lesions or those associated with atypia require surgical excision because histologic underestimation occurs at a frequency similar to that in other atypical lesions undergoing core needle biopsy.     

Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the accuracy of an add-on stereotactic unit for core needle biopsy of mammographic lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between September 1994 and February 2001, 506 stereotactic core needle biopsies of mammographic lesions in 492 patients were performed in our center on a mammography unit with add-on stereotactic equipment. Of the initial 92 patients, 80 underwent stereotactic core needle biopsy and surgical excision simultaneously. In subsequent cases, surgical biopsy was performed after core biopsy in patients who had malignant or atypical histologic results or discordance between mammographic and pathologic findings. Follow-up mammography was advised for all patients whose core biopsy results were diagnosed as benign lesions. RESULTS: Histologic results for 506 lesions undergoing stereotactic core needle biopsy were as follows: 113 (22.3%) were malignant; 369 (72.9%), benign; and 24 (4.7%), atypical. Of 113 malignant lesions identified at stereotactic core needle biopsy, 111 were confirmed as malignant, whereas two showed no evidence of malignancy at surgical excision. Of 369 lesions diagnosed as benign at stereotactic core needle biopsy, 172 (46.6%) showed no change on follow-up mammography, 114 (30.9%) were lost to follow-up, and 83 (22%) underwent surgical excision. Of 24 lesions with atypical histology, 23 had surgical follow-up, six were malignant, nine were benign, and eight were confirmed as showing atypical histology. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of the 506 lesions was complicated by five (1.0%) cases of vasovagal attack and four (0.8%) cases of bleeding. The resulting sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 98.3%, 93.0%, 86.0%, and 99.2% respectively. CONCLUSION: Biopsy with an add-on unit is safe, reliable, accurate, and cost-effective with results comparable to those reported for dedicated prone biopsy devices.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.     

Management of non malignant papillary lesions diagnosed on percutaneous biopsy

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of percutaneous breast biopsies in diagnosing and managing non malignant papillary lesions and determine if subsequent excision must be systematic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review of 2233 breast biopsies over a 43 months period (September 2001 to March 2005): sonographically guided core biopsies (n = 836), ultrasound (n = 346) or stereotactic (n:1051) guided vacuum biopsies. 86 non malignant papillary tumors were diagnosed (core biopsy:28, US:38 and stereotactic guided vacuum biopsy:20). A larger sample was systematic after core biopsy: lumpectomy (n = 19) or vacuum biopsy (n = 9). Surgical excision followed vacuum biopsy (n = 18) in case of atypia or sampling excision. Alternatively, yearly follow-up was advised (n = 40). Correlation with surgical findings (n = 37) or mammographic follow-up (n = 49) is presented. The influence of various factors on the risk of underestimation was analysed. RESULTS: Surgical resection revealed an underestimation of 5/37 (13.5%): 4/19 with core- and 1/18 with vacuum-assisted biopsy corresponding to 4 low grade ductal carcinoma in situ and a microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ. It was higher for core biopsies and related to age and size: higher when women<50 years and when radiological image>1 cm. The influence of the other factors was not significant. Of the 9 non operated papillomas after core biopsy, vacuum biopsy revealed an additional underestimation (low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 49 papillary lesions that were not surgically biopsied, 40 were monitored at 2-42 months (average: 19 months). No carcinoma was detected during this follow-up. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous biopsy is an accurate technique in managing papillary tumors. A larger histologic specimen is necessary after core biopsy. Vacuum biopsy is an attractive alternative to surgery for smaller papillomas (<1 cm), but in spite of nonsignificant results we advise subsequent excision in case of multiple papillomas, atypia or residual tumor.     

Role of US-guided fine-needle aspiration with on-site cytopathologic evaluation in management of nonpalpable breast lesions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), with radiographic follow-up or surgical excision, in conjunction with on-site cytopathologic support in the management of nonpalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The findings of 266 consecutive mammographically or sonographically identified, nonpalpable lesions (228 patients) that underwent US-guided FNA were examined retrospectively. Clustered microcalcifications did not undergo biopsy with this method. Patients who underwent follow-up excisional biopsy or mammography with a duration of at least 24 months were included in the study. RESULTS: In all, 117 lesions met criteria for inclusion, of which 85 (73%) were diagnosed as benign at cytopathologic evaluation and underwent mammographic follow-up of at least 24 months (range, 24-67 months; mean, 36 months). Thirty-two lesions (27%) had either malignant or atypical cytopathologic findings, for which surgery was recommended. Eleven (9%) of the 32 had malignant cytopathologic findings from initial US-guided FNA, which were confirmed at surgical excision. The remaining 21 lesions (18%) were diagnosed as atypical on the basis of US-guided FNA results. Of these, 18 lesions underwent excisional biopsy: Two were diagnosed as carcinoma (not otherwise specified), and 16 were diagnosed with a variety of benign disorders. The remaining three patients with atypical lesions chose mammographic follow-up rather than surgical diagnosis, and their conditions have remained stable for more than 24 months. Of the 85 benign cases, one changed during follow-up (12 months) and underwent repeat biopsy, with malignancy noted. The sensitivity of US-guided FNA in identifying malignant lesions was 93% (13 of 14), and the specificity of a benign finding was 100% (102 of 102). The positive and negative predictive values of US-guided FNA supported by on-site cytopathologic evaluation were 100% (13 of 13) and 99% (102 of 103), respectively. CONCLUSION: Supported by appropriately trained on-site cytopathologists and in conjunction with follow-up mammography, US-guided FNA appears to be efficacious in the management of patients with abnormal radiographic findings. It is quick, relatively inexpensive, and minimally invasive, and, in the presence of competent cytopathologists, should be the modality of choice.     

Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography

PURPOSE: To review ultrasound (US) findings in patients who have suspicious microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A) on screening mammography and to evaluate helpful findings in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2006, 192 patients showed microcalcifications only, without mass or associated density, on screening mammography. Among them, we selected 82 patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (category 4A) that were pathologically confirmed by surgical excision after wire localization (n=23) or biopsy (n=59). Breast US was performed in 37/82 cases and we analyzed the US findings for the calcification areas in these patients, evaluating the findings with benign or malignant pathological results. We correlated US findings with mammographic calcifications using mammography-guided 2D-localization for the calcifications before US examination. RESULTS: There were 12 malignant lesions (32.4%) including 3 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), one microinvasive ductal carcinoma (MIDC), 8 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 benign lesions (67.6%) including 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH). IDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or calcifications within complex hypoechoic masses of taller-than-wide shape on US. One MIDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma and six DCIS showed negative findings, or calcifications with a small nodule, or only calcifications on US. The most common positive US finding in benign lesions was cysts with calcifications. In 24/37 cases (64.8%) with negative US findings, 18 (75%) were benign lesions and 6 (25%) were DCIS. CONCLUSION: In patients with category 4A microcalcifications without associated findings on screening mammography, negative US findings had a high rate of benign results (18/24, 75%). Visible calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or mass on US increased the probability of malignancy.     

Sonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast

Objective

We wanted to assess the need for surgical excising papillary lesions of the breast that were diagnosed upon sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-nine women (age range: 25-74 years, mean age: 51.7 years) with 69 papillary lesions (4.9%) were diagnosed and followed after performing sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsies. Surgical excision was performed for 44 (64%) of 69 papillary lesions, and 25 lesions were followed with imaging studies (range: 6-46 months, mean: 17.9 months). The histologic findings upon core biopsy were compared with the surgical, imaging and follow-up findings.

Results

Core needle biopsies of 69 lesions yielded tissue that was classified as benign for 43 lesions, atypical for 18 lesions and malignant for eight lesions. Of the 43 lesions that yielded benign papilloma upon core needle biopsy, one had intraductal papillary carcinoma found upon surgery. An immediate surgical biopsy was recommended for this lesion because of the imaging-histologic discordance. No additional carcinoma was found during the imaging follow-up. Surgical excision was performed for 17 atypical papillary lesions, and this revealed intraductal (n = 6) or invasive (n = 2) papillary carcinoma in 8 (47%) lesions. Of the seven intraductal papillary carcinomas, surgery revealed invasive papillary carcinoma in one (14%).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that papillary lesions of the breast that are diagnosed as benign upon sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy can be followed when the results are concordant with the imaging findings.     

乳腺高危病变的乳腺X线诊断及技术进展

乳腺高危病变包括良性病变及原位癌,具有发生乳腺癌的风险。高危病变首诊主要依赖于穿刺活检,但首诊后存在一定的病变升级率。对于不同的高危病变,如不典型导管增生（ADH）、乳头状瘤伴不典型增生、放射状瘢痕、小叶原位癌（LCIS）、不典型小叶增生（ALH）、黏液囊肿样病变、平坦上皮非典型增生等,乳腺X线检查的诊断及处理原则并不完全相同。就乳腺X线检查对高危病变的诊断、处理、预后评估的研究进展予以综述。     

Papillary lesions of the breast: evaluation with stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (SDVAB) in diagnosing and managing papillary lesions of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the mammographic and histopathologic findings of 26 cases in which papillary lesions were diagnosed at SDVAB. In all cases, subsequent surgical excision (n = 20) or long-term imaging follow-up (n = 6) was performed and correlated with findings at SDVAB. RESULTS: SDVAB of 26 lesions yielded tissue that was classified as benign in 12, atypical in six, and malignant in eight. Of the 12 lesions that were diagnosed as histologically benign at SDVAB, six were surgically excised. Of these six lesions, five yielded benign correlative results. The sixth lesion was thought to be discordant with the imaging findings, and was surgically excised and determined to be malignant. Of the six benign lesions that were not surgically sampled for biopsy, five decreased in size and one was not seen at radiographic follow-up. Of the six lesions diagnosed as atypical at SDVAB that were surgically excised, one was benign and five were atypical. None proved to be malignant. Of the eight lesions diagnosed as malignant at SDVAB, surgical excision demonstrated ductal carcinoma in situ in all eight; two also had foci of invasive carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast can be reliably diagnosed at SDVAB when the SDVAB results correlate with the imaging findings. However, the extent of malignant papillary disease may be underestimated at SDVAB; in our study, invasive carcinoma was later discovered in 25% of patients with this diagnosis.     

Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review the imaging and histologic findings in patients in whom a benign papillary lesion was diagnosed at core-needle breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at each institution; patient consent was not required. The study was HIPAA compliant. The authors reviewed the findings from 42 patients (age range, 26-76 years; mean age, 54.3 years) with 43 benign papillary lesions diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. Thirty-six (84%) of the 43 lesions were surgically excised, and seven (16%) were followed up with long-term imaging. The authors assessed the radiographic findings, the histologic findings at core-needle biopsy, and the findings at subsequent surgical excision or imaging follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-patient basis and included the Blyth-Still-Casella procedure to construct exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: At core-needle biopsy, lesions were diagnosed as papilloma (n = 29), sclerosing papilloma (n = 8), and benign papillary lesions not otherwise specified (n = 6). For the 36 lesions that were surgically excised, histologic follow-up showed no residual lesion in 10, intraductal papilloma in 14, intraductal papillomatosis in two, papilloma with adjacent foci of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in eight, and well-differentiated papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in two. Mammographic follow-up in the remaining seven lesions revealed stable calcifications in five (at 28-55 months) and no residual lesion in two (at 26-29 months). In nine of the 42 patients (21%), the diagnosis was upgraded to either ADH or DCIS (exact two-sided 95% CI = 11.4%, 36.4%). CONCLUSION: The results strongly suggest that papillary lesions diagnosed as benign at core-needle biopsy should be surgically excised because a substantial number of lesions were upgraded to ADH and DCIS at excision.     

Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications obtained using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the reliability of stereotaxic biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit. METHODS: In 121 cases of indeterminate microcalcifications, core biopsy was performed using a standard mammography table with an add-on stereotaxic unit. Microcalcifications were identified on radiography of core specimens. RESULTS: Microcalcifications and a definitive histologic diagnosis were obtained in 112 core biopsies (92.6%), with no significant complications. In 23 lesions frank malignancy was diagnosed, and all of these diagnoses were confirmed on surgery. Pathologic examination suggested carcinoma in 4 lesions, and open biopsy confirmed malignancy in 3 of these cases. Four lesions showed atypical ductal hyperplasia. Benign disease was diagnosed in 81 lesions, of which 78 remained stable on mammographic follow-up (mean 16 months later) and 3 were subjected to surgical biopsy (of which 1 was malignant and 2 were benign). Nine cases were technically unsatisfactory because microcalcifications were not sampled. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic core biopsy performed with an add-on unit is a safe and reliable technique for biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications. For successful biopsy, microcalcifications must be harvested. Pathologic results should be correlated with mammographic findings. The accuracy rate compares favourably with results reported using prone biopsy tables. In an era of cost containment, this alternative to prone biopsy tables could result in significant savings in terms of capital investment and use of hospital rooms. In this study, surgical biopsy could have been avoided in 64.5% of cases.     

Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary?

OBJECTIVE:. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of cases of radial scar diagnosed by percutaneous core needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 198 nonpalpable lesions diagnosed with radial scars found at core needle biopsy, 157 lesions constituting the study group had undergone surgical excision (n = 102) or mammographic surveillance after biopsy for at least 24 months (median, 38 months; n = 55). Mammographic lesion type, lesion size, biopsy guidance method, biopsy device, number of specimens per lesion, and presence of atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Results were compared with histologic findings at surgery or mammographic findings during surveillance. RESULTS:. Carcinoma was found at excision in 28% (8/29) of lesions with associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy and 4% (5/128) of lesions without associated atypia (p < 0.0001). In the latter group, carcinoma was found at excision in 3% (2/60) of masses, 8% (3/40) of architectural distortions, and 0% (0/28) of microcalcification lesions. Malignancy was missed in 9% (5/58) of lesions biopsied with a spring-loaded device and in 0% (0/70) of lesions biopsied with a directional vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.01); and in 8% (5/60) of lesions sampled with less than 12 specimens per lesion and 0% (0/68) sampled with 12 or more specimens (p = 0.015). Lesion type, maximal lesion diameter, and type of imaging guidance (stereotactic or sonographic) were not significant factors in determining the presence of malignancy. CONCLUSION:. Diagnosis of radial scar based on core needle biopsy is likely to be reliable when there is no associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy, when the biopsy includes at least 12 specimens, and when mammographic findings are reconciled with histologic findings. When the lesion diagnosed by core needle biopsy as radial scar does not meet these criteria, excisional biopsy is indicated.     

MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience

PURPOSE: To perform magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-compatible vacuum-assisted 9-gauge core-needle biopsy of suspicious enhancing breast lesions identified at MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board granted exempt status for this HIPAA-compliant study and waived the requirement for informed consent. The MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy findings of 85 lesions in 75 patients aged 31-89 years were retrospectively reviewed. The biopsies were performed as part of the patients' clinical care with a Food and Drug Administration-approved biopsy system and not within a research protocol. All included patients had received a diagnosis of malignant, benign, or high-risk (for cancer) breast tissue at core-needle biopsy and had undergone subsequent surgery or follow-up imaging. MR imaging-guided biopsy results were compared with final histopathologic or follow-up imaging findings. RESULTS: At MR imaging-guided core-needle biopsy, malignancy was identified in 52 (61%) lesions: 35 invasive cancers and 17 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. Four (24%) of the 17 DCIS lesions were upgraded to invasive cancer at excisional biopsy or mastectomy. A high-risk lesion (ie, atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or radial scar) was identified in 18 (21%) cases. Two (25%) of eight atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions were upgraded to DCIS at excision. No malignancy was found in the atypical lobular hyperplasia (n = 2), lobular carcinoma in situ (n = 5), or radial scar (n = 3) lesions. Fifteen (18%) lesions were found to be benign lesions of unknown type at excision or mastectomy. For 13 of these 15 lesions, the benign results were concordant with the imaging findings. Both (two of 86, 2%) discordant cases represented false-negative lesions. The remaining 13 benign lesions were validated at excisional biopsy (n = 9) or follow-up imaging (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Initial experience revealed MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy to be a reasonable alternative to MR imaging-guided wire localization of suspicious lesions identified at MR imaging only, on the basis of published information regarding the latter.     

Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the frequency and causes of failure to retrieve microcalcifications in nonpalpable lesions, as judged on a radiograph of the specimen, and to determine outcome in patients with those lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to biopsy. The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and granted a waiver of informed consent. Retrospective review was performed of 1701 consecutive nonpalpable microcalcification lesions in 1511 women aged 29-92 years (median age, 54 years) who underwent percutaneous stereotactic biopsy on a prone biopsy table. Biopsy was successively performed with 14-gauge core, 14-gauge vacuum, and 11-gauge vacuum devices, with mild selection bias, and for each lesion, biopsy was performed with one device. Radiographs of the specimen were obtained to see whether microcalcifications were retrieved. Patient, mammographic, and biopsy variables were correlated with negative radiographs of the specimen. At repeat biopsy or mammographic follow-up, outcome was evaluated in patients with benign histologic results and negative radiographs of the specimen by using Fisher exact test P values. RESULTS: Radiographs of the specimen were negative in 16% (30 of 182) of lesions at 14-gauge core biopsy, in 4% (four of 96) of lesions at 14-gauge vacuum biopsy, and in 1% (19 of 1423) of lesions at 11-gauge vacuum biopsy (P < .001). Substantial bleeding was a significant factor (P < .001) in failure to retrieve microcalcifications at only 11-gauge vacuum biopsy. Histologic results in 53 lesions with negative radiographs of the specimen were malignant (n = 6), indicated atypical hyperplasia (n = 6), or were benign (n = 41). Follow-up in patients with 40 benign lesions was performed with repeat biopsy (n = 17, with malignancy in three lesions) or mammography (n = 23) for 15-128 months (median, 70 months); one patient with one lesion was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Failure to retrieve microcalcifications was least common with 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy and occurred in 1% (19 of 1423) of lesions. Cancer was missed in 8% (three of 40) of benign lesions in patients who were followed up.     

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. RESULTS: Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. CONCLUSION: Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.     

MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate a handheld vacuum-assisted device for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided breast biopsy.

Materials and methods

In 47 patients, a total of 47 suspicious breast lesions (mean maximum diameter 9 mm) seen with MRI (no suspicious changes on breast ultrasound or mammography) were sampled using a 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) device under MRI guidance. Histology of biopsy specimens was compared with final histology after surgery or with follow-up in benign lesions.

Results

Technical success was achieved in all biopsies. Histological results from VAB revealed malignancy in 15 lesions (32%), atypical ductal hyperplasia in four lesions (8%) and benign findings in 28 lesions (60%). One of four lesions with atypical ductal hyperplasia was upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ after surgery. One of seven lesions showing ductal carcinoma was upgraded to invasive carcinoma after surgery. Two lesions diagnosed as infiltrating carcinoma by VAB were not validated at excisional biopsy due to complete removal of the lesion during the procedure. During the follow-up (mean 18 months) of histologically benign lesions, we observed no cases of breast cancer development. Because of morphological changes on follow-up MRI scans, two lesions underwent surgical excision, which confirmed their benign nature. Besides minor complications (massive bleeding, n=1) requiring no further therapeutic intervention, no complications occurred.

Conclusions

MRI-guided biopsy of breast lesions using a handheld vacuum-assisted device is a safe and effective method for the workup of suspicious lesions seen on breast MRI alone.     

Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and complications of vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with an 11-gauge device was performed in 71 lesions in 67 consecutive women (age range, 23-82 years; mean age, 52.9 years). Vacuum-assisted core biopsy findings were compared with excisional biopsy, mammographic follow-up, and clinical follow-up findings (follow-up, 1-19 months; mean, 9.2 months). Procedural complications and treatment were noted. RESULTS: Of 71 lesions, 18 (25%) were diagnosed as malignant at core biopsy; one (1%), as premalignant; 30 (42%), as specific benign; and 22 (31%), as nonspecific benign. Of 18 malignant diagnoses, one (6%) was benign at excision. The premalignant specimen was benign at excision. Of 52 benign findings, 51 (98%) were proved benign at excision, mammographic follow-up, or clinical follow-up. One benign finding was carcinoma at excision. In this case, the specimen did not include the carcinoma because of a technical problem recognized at the time of the percutaneous procedure. Five (7%) of 71 biopsies resulted in bleeding beyond 10 minutes. One (1%) patient experienced a vasovagal response. CONCLUSION: According to these data, US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy is accurate. There may be a slightly higher risk of bleeding, which may be related to the lack of breast compression during the procedure, when compared with biopsy performed with stereotactic guidance.     

Vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia and patient management

Purpose

This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by determining the rate of VAB underestimation compared with definitive histology. In addition, an attempt was made to identify parameters that could help determine the most appropriate patient management.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1,776 VAB procedures performed between November 1999 and January 2008 for suspicious subclinical breast lesions visible only at mammography. A total of 177 patients with a VAB diagnosis of pure ADH were studied. Patients with a diagnosis of ADH associated with other lesions (lobular intraepithelial neoplasia, papilloma), atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and any lesions with a microhistological diagnosis other than ADH were excluded. Mammographic appearance of lesions was as follows: 152 mostly clustered microcalcifications (86%); five opacities with microcalcifications (3%); 12 single opacities (3%); and eight parenchymal distortions (4%), of which five were without and three were with microcalcifications. In cases underestimated by VAB, we evaluated the extent of ADH within ducts and lobules. Based on results, patients were subdivided into two groups: ??2 ADH foci; >2 ADH foci. Patients were subdivided into two groups: one was referred for surgery and the other for follow-up care. The decision to either perform or not perform surgery was based on combined analysis of the following parameters: patient age; risk factors in the patient??s history; mammographic extent of microcalcifications; complete excision of microcalcifications at VAB; and final Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment.

Results

In the first group (n=98), comparison of microhistology with final histology revealed that 19 cases of ADH had been underestimated by VAB. In the second group (n=79), six cases of ADH showed progression of the mammographic abnormality, which was subsequently confirmed by surgical biopsy.

Conclusions

The most relevant parameters affecting the decision to proceed to surgical excision were lesion diameter >7 mm on mammography, >2 ADH foci, incomplete removal of the calcifications and a family and/or personal history of breast cancer. Although there are no definite mammographic predictors of malignancy, a radiological assessment of suspicious lesion in the presence of an additional equivocal parameter always warrants surgical management.     

Management of complex breast cysts.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the various strategies currently in use to manage complex cysts and specifically address the need for intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of 4562 breast sonograms obtained during an 18-month period revealed 308 complex cysts in 252 women. Data collected from review of patient records included the patient's age and risk factors for breast cancer, aspiration or biopsy results (or both), follow-up imaging studies, and management recommendations. RESULTS: Management recommendations for complex cysts were 1-year follow-up in 13 patients, 6-month follow-up in 148, sonographically guided aspiration in 82, aspiration with possible core biopsy in 62, and excisional biopsy in three. No malignancies were diagnosed in the group treated with follow-up imaging, sonographically guided aspiration, or excisional biopsy. One malignancy, a papilloma with a 3-mm focus of ductal carcinoma in situ, was diagnosed in one of the patients who underwent core biopsy. CONCLUSION: Of the lesions classified as complex cysts, the malignancy rate was 0.3% (1/308). This malignancy rate is lower than that for lesions classified as probably benign using mammographic criteria (i.e., for lesions classified as category 3 lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System). Because the accepted standard practice for management of probably benign lesions is follow-up studies, the low yield of malignancy in this series suggests that complex cysts can be managed with follow-up imaging studies instead of intervention.     

Breast masses: removal of all US evidence during biopsy by using a handheld vacuum-assisted device--initial experience

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of removal of all ultrasonographic (US) evidence of breast lesions by using a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four women with breast masses underwent US-guided biopsy with an 11-gauge VAB device, with which removal of all evidence of the lesion was attempted. Histologic findings were compared with results of surgery and follow-up imaging. Patient tolerance and perceptions of the procedure and the ability of the procedure to eliminate a palpable finding were evaluated with questionnaires and findings at follow-up physical examination. RESULTS: The biopsy protocol was completed in all cases. Twenty-six benign lesions (76%) and eight malignancies (24%) were diagnosed. After VAB, 10 patients (29%) underwent surgery on the basis of histologic findings of invasive carcinoma (n = 7), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 1), lobular neoplasia (n = 1), or atypical ductal hyperplasia (n = 1). VAB resulted in complete excision of four of 10 lesions: two of eight malignancies and two of two benign lesions. Among 21 patients with benign lesions who underwent 6-month follow-up imaging, eight (38%) had a definite residual mass. At 6-month follow-up examination, VAB was seen to have eliminated the palpable abnormality in seven (88%) of eight patients with initially palpable benign masses. Thirty-two patients (94%) described no or mild pain during biopsy, and 33 patients (97%) rated care as excellent. CONCLUSION: After removal of all US evidence of breast masses with a VAB device, there was a substantial probability that residual lesion that was not visualized during the procedure would later be found at surgery or follow-up imaging. A palpable mass (< or =1.2 cm in mean diameter) was eliminated in 88% of cases, and patient tolerance and perceptions of the procedure were favorable.