Pooled analysis of 3 European case-control studies of epithelial ovarian cancer: III. Oral contraceptive use

The relationship between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and other contraceptive methods and the risk of ovarian cancer was examined in a combined analysis of 3 hospital-based case-control studies conducted in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Greece, for a total of 971 ovarian cancer cases and 2,258 controls under age 65. Compared with never-users, the combined multivariate relative risk (RR) for ever-users was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, CI = 0.4-0.8) and the estimates were consistent in the 3 datasets. The protection was also similar across strata of age and parity. Considering various measures of OC use, available in the Italian and British datasets only, the protection conveyed on ovarian cancer risk increased with the duration of use and persisted in the medium-long period: the RR in women reporting their last OC use greater than or equal to 15 years prior to diagnosis was 0.5 (95% CI = 0.2-1.0). The risks in ever-users were appreciably lower in those women who reported their first OC use before 25 years of age (RR = 0.3 for first use before age 25, 0.8 for first use at age 25-34 and 0.7 at 35 years or after). Such findings emerged similarly from Italian and British data. This combined analysis, besides offering further quantitative estimates of the protective effects of OCs on ovarian cancer risk in European populations, provides useful insights into the time pattern of the relationship between OC use and ovarian carcinogenesis, suggesting that the protection persists for 15 years or more after cessation of use and may be larger for use at younger age.     

Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968-2004

We examined cancer incidence in relation to oral contraceptive (OC) use in the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study. The study includes 17032 women, recruited at family planning clinics at ages 25-39 years between 1968 and 1974, who were using OCs, a diaphragm, or an intrauterine device. Follow-up data were available until 2004. OC use was not significantly related to nonreproductive cancer. Breast cancer findings (844 cases) likewise were very reassuring (rate ratio (RR) comparing women ever using OCs with those never doing so 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-1.1). There was a strong positive relationship between cervical cancer incidence (59 cases) and duration of OC use (RR comparing users for 97+ months with nonusers 6.1, 95%CI, 2.5-17.9). Uterine body cancer (77 cases) and ovarian cancer (106 cases) showed strong negative associations with duration of OC use: RRs for 97+ months of use were 0.1 (95%CI, 0.0-0.4) and 0.3 (95%CI, 0.1-0.5) respectively. This apparent protective effect for both cancers persisted more than 20 years after stopping OCs. Combining data for cancers of the cervix, uterine body and ovary, the age adjusted RR for women ever using OCs compared with those never doing so was 0.7 (95%CI, 0.5-0.8). Beneficial effects of OCs on the gynaecological cancers thus outweighed adverse effects.     

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurses' Health Study, United States)

Results of previous epidemiologic studies have provided reassurance that there is little, if any, increase in risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive (OC) use in general. However, in several studies, an increased risk of breast cancer has been observed in two subgroups, young women who used OCs for extended durations and in women who used OCs prior to a first-term pregnancy. We evaluated these relationships using data from the ongoing Nurses' Health Study cohort (United States). We documented 3,383 cases of breast cancer from 1976 to 1992 among 1.6 million person-years of follow-up. We observed no overall relationship between duration of OC use and breast cancer risk, even among women who reported using OCs for 10 or more years (multivariate relative risk [RR]=1.11, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.94-1.32). Among women less than 45 years of age, the multivariate RR for using OCs for 10 or more years was 1.07 (CI=0.70-1.65) compared with never-users. The risk associated with five or more years of OC use prior to a first full-term pregnancy compared with never-use was 0.96 (CI=0.65-1.43). Among women less than 45 years of age, we observed no evidence of an increased risk with OC use before a first full-term pregnancy (use for five or more years: RR=0.57, CI=0.24-1.31). Because of the age distribution of our cohort, we were unable to evaluate these relationships among women less than 40 years of age. Our study provides considerable evidence that long-term past OC use, either overall or prior to a first full-term pregnancy, does not result in any appreciable increase in breast cancer risk in women over 40 years of age.     

Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer in older women (New Zealand)

the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) use at older ages on the risk of breast cancer was examined in a national population-based case-control study conducted in New Zealand. A total of 891 women aged 25 to 54 years with a first diagnosis of breast cancer, and 1,864 control subjects, randomly selected from the electoral rolls, were interviewed. The relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for women aged 45 to 54 years at diagnosis who had ever used OCs was 1.0 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.77–1.3). There was no significant increase in risk of breast cancer among recent users of OCs of any age. Analyses according to age at first and last use among women aged 40 years and older at diagnosis showed no group with an elevated risk of breast cancer. Women who had used OCs for 10 years or longer after age 40 had an apparent increase in risk (RR=2.7, CI=0.97–7.5), but the trend in risk with duration of use was not significant. These findings suggest that OC use in older women does not affect their risk of breast cancer appreciably, but it is not possible to rule out a modest increase in risk with such use.This research was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of New Zealand and from the Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization.     

Oral contraceptive and IUD use and endometrial cancer: a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China

Oral contraceptive (OC) and intrauterine device (IUD) use have been shown to be protective factors for endometrial cancer in several epidemiological studies; however, few studies have been conducted in Chinese populations. We evaluated the association between OC and IUD use and endometrial cancer risk in a population-based case-control study among Chinese women in Shanghai, China. The study included 1,204 newly diagnosed endometrial cancer cases and 1,212 age frequency-matched healthy controls. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In our study population, 18.5% cases and 24.9% controls reported having ever used OCs with an OR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93), after adjusting for known risk or protective factors for endometrial cancer. The risk of endometrial cancer decreased with long-term use of OCs with the OR for more than 72 months of use being 0.50 (95% CI, 0.30-0.85). The effect of OC use remained 25 or more years after cessation of use; the associated OR was 0.57 (95% CI = 0.42-0.78) as compared to nonusers. Similarly, fewer cases than controls had ever used IUD, with the multivariable adjusted OR being 0.53 (95% CI = 0.43-0.65). A reduction in risk was observed regardless the duration of use or age at first and last use. These results suggest that OC and IUD use may confer long-term protection against endometrial cancer.     

Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer among premenopausal women: final report from a study in southern Sweden

In southern Sweden during the 1960s, women began to use oral contraceptives (OCs) extensively at a young age. This case-control study investigates the relationship between the use of OCs and breast cancer development in women in southern Sweden diagnosed in the early 1980s. The risk for breast cancer after OC use among premenopausal women was modeled, after adjustment was made for age, age at menarche, and age at first full-term pregnancy or parity. Both the duration of OC use before 25 years of age and commencement of OC use at a young age were associated with a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer as well as a significant trend. The duration of OC use before the first full-term pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, but it did not show a significant trend. The total duration of OC use was weakly, but not significantly, associated with breast cancer development. The odds ratio for women starting OC use before 20 years of age was 5.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-12.8]; for women using OCs for greater than 5 years before age 25, it was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.1-13.2); and for women using OCs for greater than or equal to 8 years before first full-term pregnancy, it was 2.0 (95% CI, 0.8-4.7). In multivariate analyses including the different measurements of OC use, only starting age of OC use was significantly associated with breast cancer. The exposure-response relationship between duration of OC use and risk of breast cancer depended on the age at first use of OCs. Given a fixed duration of OC use, the risk increased with younger starting age of OC use. The findings point to the importance of the early reproductive years as risk determinants for breast cancer after OC use.     

Long-term effects of oral contraceptives on ovarian cancer risk

Several epidemiologic studies have reported a protective effect of oral contraceptives (OCs) on ovarian cancer. However, there remain open issues, including better quantification of time-related factors such as time since last use, age at first use and time since first use. We performed a collaborative reanalysis of 6 case-control studies conducted between 1978 and 1999 in the United Kingdom, Greece and Italy, including a total of 2,768 incident, histologically confirmed cases of epithelial ovarian cancer and 6,274 hospital controls under age 70 years. A reduced risk of ovarian cancer was found for ever- compared to never-users [odds ratio (OR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.79], and a stronger reduction was observed for women who had used OCs for > or =5 years (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.76) compared to those who had used them for <5 years. The protective effect of OCs on ovarian cancer was consistent across strata of age, parity, menopausal status and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. After allowance for duration of use, no other time factor was related to ovarian cancer risk: the reduced risk was similar for women who stopped OC use > or =20 years before compared to <10 years; likewise, no significant modification of risk reduction was observed for age at first OC use and time since first OC use. The present analysis indicates that, after taking into account duration of OC use, the OC protection from ovarian cancer persists for a long time after stopping use.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer in northern Italy. Final report from a case-control study.

To assess the relation between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer, we analysed data from a case-control study conducted in Northern Italy between 1983 and 1991 on 2,309 cases below age 60 and 1,928 controls admitted to hospital for acute diseases unrelated to OC use and to any of the known or potential risk factors for breast cancer. OC use was reported by 16% of cases and 14% of controls. The multivariate relative risk (RR) for ever vs never use of combination OC was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.4). However, there was no trend in risk with duration. The RR was elevated for very short use, but declined to 0.8 (95% CI = 0.5-1.0) for five or more years'' use. No noteworthy relationship was found for other major measures of OC use, although RR estimates were above unity for women who had stopped use less than 5 years before (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), started use less than 10 years before (RR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.9), started when 25 or more years old (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.7), or after first birth (RR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0-1.5). No interaction was observed between OC use and family history of breast cancer, parity and age at first birth. A separate analysis of 373 cases and 456 control below age 40 showed no association with ever use (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.6-1.2).     

Oral contraceptives and risk of familial breast cancer

The risk of breast cancer of oral contraceptive (OC) use in 1423 women from families with hereditary/familial breast cancer recruited through a cancer family clinic was analyzed in a matched case-control study. Ninety-eight women tested positive for a BRCA1 mutation. Hazard ratio for ever use of OCs adjusted for other risk factors was 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.18) in the total data set and 2.00 (0.36-10.9) in BRCA1 mutation carriers. We did not find evidence for interaction between BRCA1 mutation status and OC use on breast cancer risk. Recent users had a statistically significant increase in risk with hazard ratios of 1.99, 2.05, and 1.69 for up to 5, 10, and 15 years since last OC use, while users with more than 15 years since last use had a reduction of risk to 0.69 compared to never users. We conclude that the effects of OC use on breast cancer risk in familial breast cancer may be similar to the effects in the general population. For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the point estimate is a doubling of risk, but CI is wide and no conclusion may be drawn from this study alone.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer in former users of oral contraceptives--The Norwegian Women and Cancer study

Combined estrogen-progestin menopausal therapy (HRT) and combined estrogen-progestin contraceptives (OC) both increase breast cancer risk during current use and a few years after. We investigated risk of breast cancer in women who were users of HRT dependant on former history of OC use in a large, national population-based cohort study, the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC). Exposure information was collected through postal questionnaires. Based on follow-up of 30,118 postmenopausal women by linkage to national registers of cancer, deaths, and emigration we revealed 540 incident breast cancer cases between 1996 and 2004. Compared to never users of either drugs current use of HRT gave a significant (p = 0.002) higher risk of breast cancer in former OC users, RR = 2.45 (95% CI 1.92-3.12), than among never users of OCs, RR = 1.67 (1.32-2.12). Relative risk of current use of HRT was similar for estrogen only and combinations with progestin added in ever users of OCs. The increased risk of breast cancer in current HRT users with a history of former OC use could have potential great impact on postmenopausal breast cancer risk as the proportion of postmenopausal women with former OC use will continue to increase.     

Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among African-American women

Recent epidemiologic studies, most of them in predominantly White populations, have suggested that long duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use may increase the risk of breast cancer at young ages. We assessed the relationship of OC use to the risk of breast cancer in African-American women aged 25 to 59 years, using interview data from a multipurpose hospital-based case-control study. Five hundred and twenty-four cases hospitalized for invasive breast cancer were compared with 1,021 controls with nonmalignant conditions unrelated to OC use. Relative risks (RR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) were estimated relative to a reference category of use for less than 12 months; potential confounders were controlled by multiple logistic regression analysis. Among women under age 45, three or more years of OC use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer: the RR estimate was 2.8 (CI=1.5–5.0) for three to four years of use, and declined to 1.5 (CI=0.8.3.0) for 10 or more years of use. Recency and timing of use did not explain the observed association. Among women aged 45 to 59, OC use was associated with little or no increase in risk: the RR estimate for three or more years of use was 1.3 (CI=0.7–2.4). The findings add to the evidence from studies of White women and a recent study of Black women which have suggested an increased risk of breast cancer at young ages for moderate or long duration use of OCs.This research was supported by the US National Cancer Institute (grants R01 CA55766 and R01 CA45762). Additional support was provided by the US Food and Drug Administration (FD-U-000082); the views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Drug Administration. The Slone Epidemiology Unit also receives support from Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., and Marion Merrell Dow Inc.     

Oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer: An Italian case-control study

The association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of ovarian cancer was analysed in a case-control study, conducted between 1985 and 1989 on 505 epithelial ovarian cancer cases under 60 years of age, and 1375 controls in hospitals for a spectrum of acute conditions, not gynaecological, hormonal or neoplastic, apparently unrelated to OC use. 41 (8.1%) women with epithelial ovarian cancer and 192 (14.0%) controls reported OC use. The multivariate relative risk (RR) for ever use was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5–1.0). The risk decreased with duration of use: compared with never users the multivariate RRs were 0.9 and 0.5 respectively for less than 2 years and 2 years or more users (X²₁ trend = 6.17, P = 0.01). The risk of ovarian cancer decreased with recency and latency of use: the estimated RR were 0.5 and 0.9 in women reporting last OC use less than 10 or 10 years or more from the diagnosis of the disease, and 0.6 and 0.8 in those reporting first OC use less than 10 or 15 or more years before. The protective effect of OC was consistent in separate strata of selected covariates, including parity and other major known or suspected risk factors for ovarian cancer. There was some indication that the protection declines with advancing age, but the risk estimates were similar in premenopause and postmenopause.     

Oral contraceptives, menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the California Teachers Study

We examined oral contraceptive (OC) and menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) use in relation to risk of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Women under age 85 years participating in the California Teachers Study with no history of hematopoietic cancer were followed from 1995 through 2007. A total of 516 of 114,131 women eligible for OC use analysis and 402 of 54,758 postmenopausal women eligible for MHT use analysis developed B-cell NHL. Multivariable adjusted and age stratified Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Ever versus never OC use was marginally associated with lower B-cell NHL risk, particularly among women first using OCs before age 25 years (RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.51-0.99); yet, no duration-response effect was observed. No association was observed for ever versus never MHT use among postmenopausal women (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.83-1.33) overall or by formulation (estrogen alone, ET, or estrogen plus progestin, EPT). Among women with no MHT use, having bilateral oophorectomy plus hysterectomy was associated with greater B-cell NHL risk than having natural menopause (RR=3.15, 95% CI=1.62-6.13). Bilateral oophorectomy plus hysterectomy was not associated with risk among women who used ET or EPT. These results indicate that exogenous hormone use does not strongly influence B-cell NHL risk.     

Exogenous hormone use and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study

The association between the use of exogenous hormones as either oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer incidence was examined in the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS) among 62,573 women aged 55 to 69 years. Information on these types of exogenous hormone use and other risk factors was collected by mailed questionnaire. During 3.3 years of follow-up, 471 incident breast cancer cases were identified. After adjustment for traditional breast cancer risk factors, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer was 1.09 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.79–1.48) for women who ever used OCs cf women who never used OCs. The relative rates (with CIs) for women who used OCs for a period < 5 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15+ years were 0.97 (0.61–1.55), 1.20 (0.69–2.07), 1.03 (0.60–1.77), and 1.96 (0.99–3.89), respectively. The test for trend was not significant (P=0.13). There was no evidence of any association between the number of years between the first and the last use of OCs and breast cancer incidence. In the subgroup of women with first-degree relatives with breast cancer, the RR for breast cancer associated with ever use of OCs was 1.51 (CI=0.67–3.41), whereas in the remaining women, the RR was 0.97 (CI=0.73–1.27). Ever-use of HRT compared with never-use was not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk in the multivariate analysis (RR=0.99, CI=0.68–1.43). Also, the number of years of HRT use was not associated with an increased breast cancer risk (trend P=0.83), nor was the number of years between the first and the last use of HRT and breast cancer incidence. One subgroup of women in which the use of HRT seemed associated (but not significantly) with an increase in breast cancer risk was women with an induced menopause (RR=1.72, CI=0.95–3.12). The RR of breast cancer for women who had ever used both OCs and HRT, compared with women who never used these exogenous hormones was 1.00 (CI=0.51–1.94). From this study, it cannot be concluded that the use of exogenous hormones is a strong risk factor for the development of postmenopausal breast cancer.Since the acceptance of this paper, two other papers have been published on HRT and breast cancer. For HRT (estrogen alone), one supports our finding of no association (Stanford et al, JAMA 1995; 274: 137–42) and one did find a positive association for current use (Colditz et al, New Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1589–93), most pronounced in older women with longer durations of use. With regard to use of combined estrogen-progestin HRT, the results in both papers were comparable to those for estrogen alone. More research on (combinations of) types of hormones is needed.This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society.     

Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs), menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and the risk of colorectal cancer was investigated in a case-control study conducted in northern Italy between 1985 and 1992 on 709 women with incident colorectal cancer and 992 controls admitted to hospital for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic, non-digestive tract, non-hormone-related disorders. A reduced risk of colorectal cancer was observed in women who had ever used OCs [multivariate odds ratio (OR) = 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.92]. The OR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.27-1.02) for use over 2 years. For women ever using HRT, the multivariate OR was 0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.66). The risk was inversely related to duration of use, with ORs of 0.46 for 2 years or less and 0.25 for more than 2 years of use. No consistent pattern of trends was observed with time since first or last use. This study provides further evidence that OC and HRT do not increase, and possibly decrease, the risk of colorectal cancer. These results, if confirmed, would have important implications for the ultimate risk-benefit assessment of female hormone preparations.     

Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Current use of oral contraceptives (OCs) has been reported to increase breast cancer risk slightly. In 1991/1992, a prospective cohort study specifically designed to examine the role of hormonal contraceptives in relation to breast cancer was conducted in Norway and Sweden. This study was entitled Women's Lifestyle and Health. Of 196,000 invited women aged 30-49 years, 106,844 women answered a 4-page questionnaire. Altogether, 103,027 women providing information on contraceptive use were included in the analysis presented here, and 1,008 primary invasive breast cancers were diagnosed throughout 1999 (end of follow-up). Proportional hazard regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with adjustment for age and other possible confounders. An increased breast cancer risk was observed among women who were current/recent users of OCs of any type at the start of follow-up [RR, 1.6; 96% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-2.1]. Current/recent use (i.e., use in the year preceding cohort enrolment) of combined OCs (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0) and progestin-only pills (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4) entailed similar levels of increased risk. An increased risk of borderline significance was found among short-term (i.e., less than 13 months) users before age 20 years (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7) and before first full-term pregnancy (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Long-term users of OCs were at a higher risk of breast cancer than never users (test for trend, P = 0.005). Current/recent use of OCs is associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Use of combined OCs and progestin-only pills seem to increase the risk at the same level.     

Large bowel cancer in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors: a case-control study

A community-based case-control study of the effect of reproductive factors on risk of large bowel cancer in Australia is described. The study involved 155 cases (99 colon cancer, 56 rectal cancer) and 311 controls who were interviewed with regard to pregnancies and their outcomes, lactation, menstrual history, and oral contraceptive (OC) use. Increasing parity was associated with a decreasing risk of colon cancer; para 0, relative risk (RR)=1; para 1-2, RR=0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.4-1.8; para greater than or equal to 3, RR=0.4, 95% CI=0.2-0.8; later age at first live birth (AFLB) was associated with increasing risk (AFLB less than or equal to 21 yr, RR=1; 22-25 yr, RR=2.3, 95% CI=1.0-5.5; greater than or equal to 26 yr, RR=2.7, 95% CI=1.2-6.2). These effects were independent of each other. Parity appeared to exert its predominant effect on risk of cancer of the right colon. OC use was more common among controls than cases (RR=0.5; 95% CI=0.3-1.2 for ever vs. never users) and showed a dose-response effect in multiple logistic analysis. The pattern of point-estimate RR for rectal cancer was largely congruent with those for colon cancer but was not significantly different from 1.0.     

Parity and other reproductive factors and risk of adenomatous polyps of the distal colorectum (United States)

Evidence for an effect of reproductive factors on colorectal carcinogenesis is inconsistent and little is known about their role in development of precursor adenomatous polyps. We evaluated the relation between reproductive factors and distal colorectal adenomas (n = 982) during14 years of follow up of 26,983 participants in the Nurses' Health Study(United States). The women were free of diagnosed cancer or polyps in 1980,underwent endoscopy 1980-94, and had reported on their parity, oral contraceptive (OC) use, and ages at menarche, first term-pregnancy, and menopause. We calculated relative risks (RR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) using multiple logistic regression. Women with higher parity had an increased risk of adenomas of the distal colorectum (P trend = 0.004;6+ cf 0 parity: RR = 1.3, CI = 0.9-1.8) or distal colon (P trend = 0.002, RR= 1.7, CI = 1.2-2.6). This association was significantly stronger among women with a family history of colorectal cancer ( P interaction = 0.03); comparing6+ term-pregnancies with nulliparity, among those with a family history, the RR for distal colon adenoma was 3.2 (CI = 1.4-7.2), while among those without a family history, the RR was 1.3 (CI = 0.8-2.2). We observed no association for distal colorectal adenoma and age at menarche, age at first term-pregnancy, ever use of OCs, or menopausal status. Further work is needed to clarify the relation of parity with colon adenoma risk. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Several studies have suggested an inverse association between use of combined oral contraceptives (OC) and the risk of colorectal cancer and here we present a meta-analysis of published studies. Articles considered were epidemiological studies published as full papers in English up to June 2000 that included quantitative information on OC use. The pooled relative risks (RR) of colorectal cancer for ever OC use from the 8 case-control studies was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.94), and the pooled estimate from the 4 cohort studies was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). The pooled estimate from all studies combined was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92), without apparent heterogeneity. Duration of use was not associated with a decrease in risk, but there was some indication that the apparent protection was stronger for women who had used OCs more recently (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.71). A better understanding of this potential relation may help informed choice of contraception.     

Impact of teenage oral contraceptive use in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer cases who have undergone BRCA mutation testing

Oral contraceptive (OC) use in young women has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. This matched case-control study aims to elucidate the combined effects of OC use and genetic factors in a population-based series of BRCA1/2 mutation-tested early-onset breast cancers. A first invasive breast cancer was diagnosed in 259 women aged 40 years between 1990 and 1995 in the South Swedish Health Care Region. A total of 245 women were included in this study. Information on family history of cancer, reproductive factors, smoking and OC use was obtained from questionnaires or patient charts. Three age-matched controls per case were chosen from a prospective South Swedish cohort. Ever OC use and current OC use were not associated with breast cancer. Cases were more likely to have used OCs before age 20 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.10 (95% CI 1.32-3.33)) and before their first child (adjusted OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.02-2.62)). When stratified by age, the effect of early OC use was limited to women diagnosed prior to age 36 years (OR 1.53 (1.17-1.99) per year of OC use prior to age 20 years). The risks were similar for low-dose and high-dose OCs. The probability of being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier was three times higher among cases who started OC use prior to age 20 years compared with cases who started at age 20 years or older or who had never used OCs. However, the duration of OC use was similar among cases with and without BRCA1/2 mutations. No association was seen with a first-degree family history of breast cancer. Each year of OC use prior to age 20 years conferred a significantly increased risk for early-onset breast cancer, while there was no risk associated with use after age 20 years.