Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates in children with high-risk conditions—A systematic review

BackgroundInfluenza is a common cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among the elderly and those with certain chronic diseases. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for individuals in at-risk groups, but rates of vaccination are particularly low in children with high-risk conditions (HRCs).ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of studies that have examined interventions aimed at improving influenza vaccination in children with HRCs.MethodsTwo databases – PubMed and SCOPUS – were searched (with no time or language restrictions) using a combination of keywords – Influenza AND vaccination OR immunization OR children AND asthma OR malignancy OR high-risk AND reminder. Duplicates were removed, and abstracts of relevant articles were screened using specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirteen articles were selected, and five additional studies were identified following a review of the reference lists of the initial thirteen articles, bringing the total number to eighteen.ResultsMost studies were conducted in the United States. Among the 18 studies, there was one systematic review of a specific intervention in asthmatic children, seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs), six before-and-after studies, one non-randomized controlled trial, one retrospective cohort study, one quasi-experimental post-test study, and one letter to editors. Interventions reported include multi-component strategies, letter reminders, telephone recall, letters plus telephone calls, an asthma education tool and year-round scheduling for influenza vaccination, amongst others.ConclusionThere is good evidence that reminder letters will improve influenza vaccination uptake in children with HRCs, but the evidence that telephone recall or a combination of letter reminder and telephone recall will improve uptake is weak. It is not known if multiple reminder letters are more effective than single letters or if multi-component strategies are more effective than single or dual component strategies. There is a need for further research of these interventions, possibly outside the United States.     

The relationship of health beliefs and a postcard reminder to influenza vaccination.

The relationship of certain health beliefs to influenza vaccination and the effect of a postcard reminder on vaccination rates was studied among 232 high-risk patients. In agreement with the Health Belief Model tested, the patients vaccinated believed influenza to be more serious, believed they were more susceptible to influenza, and believed the vaccine to be more efficacious than did patients not vaccinated. Those not vaccinated were less satisfied with their medical care and felt the vaccine was more expensive than those vaccinated. A postcard reminding patients of influenza vaccination was an effective way to increase the vaccination rate. Patients receiving the card had a 59.7 percent vaccination rate compared to a 30.0 percent rate among those not receiving the postcard. This study suggests that a reminder postcard is an effective means to promote influenza vaccination and that these beliefs are important determinants of vaccination behavior.     

Influenza immunization: the impact of notifying patients of high-risk status

BACKGROUND. The influenza immunization rate in the high-risk military and retired military population has not been reported. To determine this rate, and to test whether the rate could be improved by notifying patients of their high-risk status, a clinical trial was conducted using a postcard reminder as an intervention. METHODS. All 1068 high-risk patients enrolled in a large, residency-affiliated, military family practice department were identified. Of these, 519 patients were randomly selected to receive a reminder postcard; the remainder (549) were not sent a card. The immunization rates of each group were compared. RESULTS. A significantly higher percentage of those to whom postcards were sent received an influenza immunization (25.2% vs 9.1%, P less than .001). This difference was significant in all demographic groups except in those less than 21 years of age and those 21 to 40 years of age, in which very few patients presented for immunization. In those in the study group aged 65 years and over, 46.7% were immunized vs 20% of controls (P less than .001). Those aged 65 years and older and those in the higher income group had higher immunization rates, while those aged 40 years and under had very low immunization rates. CONCLUSIONS. The influenza immunization rate among military beneficiaries in high-risk groups is low, but can be significantly improved with a reminder postcard. This intervention may be more effective in the older and higher-income segments of the high-risk population. The low immunization rates of the lower-income group and the younger age groups have significant public health implications and should be studied further.     

Improving influenza vaccination performance in an HMO setting: the use of computer-generated reminders and peer comparison feedback.

We evaluated a program for improving influenza immunization performance in a health maintenance organization (HMO). The HMO implemented several interventions successively from 1984-87: a postcard reminder to members at high risk for complications of influenza, a computer-generated reminder to the physician at the time of any primary care visit by high-risk patients, performance feedback to chiefs of service, and, finally, retrospective feedback to each physician comparing his/her performance with that of the other physicians. We examined immunization rates for a group of members older than age 65, a high-risk group under age 65, and a group of diabetic members who had not been subject to the reminders (vs a group who had been covered by the program). Vaccination rates were increased in those diabetic members who received reminders. Nevertheless, among members younger and older than age 65 whose experience was observed over three flu seasons, a significant increase in vaccination rates was not achieved until physician feedback was added to the program. We conclude that each element of the reminder and feedback program has contributed to the overall increase in vaccination rates at the HMO and that effective ongoing influenza immunization programs can be implemented in practice settings with appropriate systems support.     

Patient views on reminder letters for influenza vaccinations in an older primary care patient population: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives of older adults on the acceptability of reminder letters for influenza vaccinations. METHODS: We randomly selected 23 family physicians from each Family Health and Primary Care network participating in a demonstration project designed to increase the delivery of preventive services in Ontario. From the roster of each physician, we surveyed 35 randomly selected patients over 65 years of age who recently received a reminder letter regarding influenza vaccinations from their physician. The questionnaires sought patient perspectives on the acceptability and usefulness of the letter. We also conducted follow-up telephone interviews with a subgroup of respondents to explore some of the survey findings in greater depth. RESULTS: 85.3% (663/767) of patients completed the questionnaire. Sixty-five percent of respondents recalled receiving the reminder (n=431), and of those, 77.3% found it helpful. Of the respondents who recalled the letter and received a flu shot (n=348), 11.2% indicated they might not have done so without the letter. The majority of respondents reported that they would like to continue receiving reminder letters for influenza vaccinations (63.0%) and other preventive services (77.1%) from their family physician. The interview participants endorsed the use of reminder letters for improving vaccination coverage in older adults, but did not feel that the strategy was required for them personally. CONCLUSIONS: The general attitude of older adults towards reminder letters was favourable, and the reminders appear to have contributed to a modest increase in influenza vaccination rates.     

The effect of microcomputer-generated reminders on influenza vaccination rates in a university-based family practice center

Less than 20 percent of elderly and other high-risk persons targeted for annual influenza vaccination are immunized each year. In most busy practice settings, it is difficult for primary care physicians to identify every patient in need of preventive health interventions. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of microcomputer-generated reminders on influenza vaccination rates in a university-based family practice center. The practice uses an interactive encounter form system from which updated clinical information is routinely entered into a cumulative database. During a 2-month period, 686 patients were identified in the database as eligible to receive influenza vaccine according to accepted criteria. Practice physicians (n = 32) were stratified by level of training and randomized to one of three groups, thereby receiving printed reminders on the encounter forms of all, none, or half of their eligible patients. Patients of physicians who always received reminders were more likely to receive influenza vaccine during the study period than patients of the never-reminded physicians (51 percent versus 30 percent, P less than 0.001). Patients whose physicians received reminders for only half their patients had an intermediate likelihood of receiving a vaccination if a reminder was printed (38 percent) but were less likely than the patients of never-reminded physicians to receive the vaccine if no reminder was printed (20 percent, P less than 0.001). This study suggests that physicians learn to depend on reminders for preventive health activities and that reminders are most effective when they are provided at every patient encounter.     

Public health in managed care: a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of postcard reminders.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an annual public health intervention in a managed care setting. METHODS: Managed care organization members 65 years and older who received influenza immunization in 1996 were randomized to an intervention group (mailed a postcard reminder to receive an influenza vaccination in 1997) or a control group (no postcard). Vaccination rates for both groups were assessed monthly. RESULTS: Members receiving the intervention were no more likely to be immunized (78.6%) than members of the control group (77.2%, P = .222). Members were vaccinated at the same pace regardless of vaccination history and postcard intervention status. CONCLUSIONS: Postcard reminders were not an effective intervention among seniors who had been vaccinated the previous year.     

Improving preventive care at a medical clinic: how can the patient help?

We developed a comprehensive individualized preventive care reminder system and then tested the hypothesis that directly involving patients in the reminder process would lead to greater use of preventive services than involving physicians only. There were three experimental groups of 350 patients each: in group 1 physicians and patients received the reminder; in group 2 physicians only received the reminder; in group 3 neither physicians nor patients received the reminder. Nine preventive care services were studied: blood pressure measurement; dental exam; ocular pressure measurement; stool exam for occult blood; influenza, pneumococcal, and tetanus vaccinations; mammography; and Papanicolaou smears. Need for these services was determined by telephone interview and chart review. To determine whether services were obtained, charts were reviewed after four to eight months of follow-up. For overall compliance with preventive recommendations and for several individual services (stool exam for occult blood, tetanus vaccination, mammography), group 1 patients received significantly more preventive care than group 2. Likewise, group 2 patients received more preventive care than group 3. These data show that involving patients in reminder efforts is an effective means of raising the level of preventive services.     

Effect of mobile phone text messaging for improving the uptake of influenza vaccination in patients with rare diseases

ObjectivesInfluenza vaccine is recommended in some chronic medical conditions, including several rare diseases. The objectives of the study were to assess the effect of text message reminders on influenza vaccination uptake of patients with selected rare diseases and delayed vaccination, and to describe their characteristics.MethodsQuasi-experimental pre-post intervention study performed along the 2016 influenza vaccination campaign in the Autonomous Community of Madrid. Unvaccinated patients diagnosed with a selected rare disease were targeted for intervention. SMS were sent to them at least one month after the beginning of the campaign, in four consecutive weeks. Those with no mobile phones available or no certainty of message reception, were assigned as controls. The association between the reception of the SMS and vaccination uptake was assessed using multiple poisson regression models.ResultsOf 69.040 patients with delayed vaccination, 87.2% received an SMS reminder in the asigned contact mobile telephone. Global influenza vaccine coverage reached 41.3%. The uptake of influenza vaccine was significantly higher among those receiving the reminder (9.3% vs. 7.1% in the control group, p < 0.001). Those who received a SMS reminder were 30% more likely to uptake seasonal influenza vaccine. By sex and age, the reception of the reminder was associated with a significantly higher probability of vaccination in men ≥65 years with at least a concurrent chronic condition (IRR: 1.58, CI95%: 1.25–2.00). Among women, this higher probability was detected in those between 14 and 64 years of age (IRR: 1.41, CI95%: 1.22–1.63), and ≥65 years without concurrent chronic conditions (IRR: 1.40, CI95%: 1.05–1.89).ConclusionAlthough the intervention was modestly effective, it proved beneficial in some cases. It can be an additional strategy to improve vaccine uptake, since it is simple, feasible, affordable and easily scalable, particularly when immunization and target population data are available in population registries.     

Practice and Physician Characteristics Associated with Influenza Vaccination Delivery Rates Following a Patient Reminder Letter Intervention

As part of the “Provider and Patient Reminders in Ontario: Multi-strategy Prevention Tools” demonstration project, the purpose of this study was to explore the practice and physician characteristics associated with influenza vaccination rates following a reminder letter intervention for patients 65 years of age and older. Using a sample of 179 physicians, we estimated a multiple linear regression model to examine variables predictive of vaccination delivery rates. Several provider characteristics, including certification with the College of Family Physicians of Canada and practicing in an urban area, were predictive of the success of the reminder letter campaign. Examining other physician and practice factors associated with vaccination delivery following a reminder letter campaign may help improve such prevention efforts.     

The effect of a combined influenza/pneumococcal immunization reminder letter

BACKGROUND: The effect of a combined influenza and pneumococcal immunization reminder letter on increasing influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates, and the timeliness of receiving immunizations after receipt of a reminder letter, have not been examined. This study addresses these issues using a sample of new Medicare beneficiaries residing in Hawaii. METHODS: Newly enrolled Medicare beneficiaries in Hawaii from 25 September 1995 through 31 August 1996 were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1, no letter (n=2144); Group 2, influenza immunization reminder letter only (n=2213); or Group 3, pneumococcal and influenza immunization reminder letter (n=2171). Health Care Financing Administration claims data were compared among groups. RESULTS: In Group 3, the influenza immunization rate increased 3.8 percentage points (n=87; p=0.017) compared with Group 1. The Group 3 pneumococcal immunization rate increased 3.5 percentage points (n=78; p<0.001) compared to Group 1 and 4.0 percentage points (n=86; p<0.001) compared to Group 2. Sixty-six beneficiaries in Group 3 received simultaneous pneumococcal and influenza immunizations, a significant difference compared to Group 1 or Group 2. Increases in immunizations were observed immediately following the reminder letters and the effect persisted for 5 to 7 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The combination letter increased both influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates and the simultaneous administration of immunizations without detrimental effect to influenza immunization rates. A combined reminder letter is inexpensive and recommended as part of a multicomponent campaign for adult immunization.     

Inequalities in uptake of influenza vaccine by deprivation and risk group: time trends analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate influenza immunisation rates in the United Kingdom over a 6-year period and examine trends in uptake by deprivation, ethnicity, rurality and risk group. Influenza immunisation rates were determined from 1999/2000 to 2004/2005 using a large general practice database (QRESEARCH). There was a relative increase of 59.5% in the overall influenza vaccination rate over the study period. In 2004/2005, 70.2% of all patients aged 65 and over were vaccinated, compared with 29.3% of patients in a clinical risk group aged less than 65. Males, patients from deprived areas and from areas with a higher proportion of non-White residents had slightly lower vaccination rates overall. This general practice based study suggests that substantial increases in influenza vaccination rates have occurred across all risk groups, but that increased focus should be given to immunising high-risk patients below the age of 65.     

Increasing response rates of gynaecologists to a survey: a randomised trial of telephone prompts

Abstract: This study used a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone prompts to increase the response rate of gynaecologists to a survey. A nine-page questionnaire about management of women with abnormal Pap smears was mailed to Fellows of the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. A random sample was contacted in advance by telephone, and nonrespondents received a telephone reminder 14 days after the initial mail-out. The control group was mailed questionnaires and a reminder letter conventionally. On Day 25, nonresponders in both groups were mailed a second questionnaire. Of the intervention group, 84 per cent responded to the survey compared to 69 per cent of the control group (P = 0.005). A telephone call in anticipation of a mailed questionnaire is highly recommended.     

Premarital rubella screening program: from identification to vaccination of susceptible women in the state of Hawaii

Premarital rubella screening programs are effective in identifying women of childbearing age who are susceptible to rubella. There is concern, however, that once identified, susceptible women may not be subsequently vaccinated. Therefore, a study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a motivational letter mailed at the time of serologic testing. Rubella-susceptible women identified by a premarital screening program were randomly divided into two groups: one group of 134 received a motivational letter and one group of 143 did not. Three months later, 52 percent of the women in the motivational group had been vaccinated, compared with only 24 percent (P less than 0.05) of the women in the control group. In this study, a motivational letter was found to lead to a significant increase in rubella vaccination rates among susceptible women. With the increasing emphasis on rubella vaccination programs for adult women, active approaches are necessary to identify and vaccinate susceptible women.     

Enhancing influenza immunization. Postcard and telephone reminders and the challenge of immunization site shift

OBJECTIVE: To determine if postcard and telephone reminders increased the rate of influenza immunization of Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN: Before and after trial (postcard reminders) with systematically allocated control group (telephone reminder intervention). SETTING: A semirural family practice residency program. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS: All 475 noninstitutionalized persons older than 65 years who had received at least 1 office service in the previous 2 years. INTERVENTION: In September 1996, each of 475 patients received a postcard urging prompt influenza immunization. Those not responding within 1 month were systematically allocated either to a group receiving further telephone contact or to a control group. At the time of telephone contact, any offered information about influenza immunization received outside the Smoky Hill Family Practice Center, Salina, Kan, was recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the percentage of change in practice-administered influenza immunizations compared with the baseline rate of the preceding 2 years; the difference in immunization rates between the telephone intervention group and controls; and the number of patients contacted by telephone who reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients who received a postcard obtained office influenza immunizations within 1 month, but no additional immunizations could be attributed to the telephone intervention. Thirty-five percent of patients contacted by telephone reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center. CONCLUSIONS: The postcard intervention was associated with a significant increase in the office immunization rate. This increase may have been confounded by "site shift" in which individuals came to the office for an immunization that they might otherwise have received at other community sites.     

Improving the rates of inpatient pneumococcal vaccination: impact of standing orders versus computerized reminders to physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of interventions using standing orders and computerized reminders to physicians on inpatient pneumococcal vaccination rates relative to a control group. DESIGN: Open trial of the following approaches, each on a different ward: (1) standing orders for vaccination of eligible consenting patients, (2) computerized reminders to physicians, and (3) usual practice. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Four hundred twenty-four patients were admitted to three 30-bed inpatient medical wards during a 4-month period in 1999 at one hospital. Unvaccinated patients 65 years or older and competent to give oral consent were included. INTERVENTION: A pharmacist activated a standing orders protocol for vaccination of all eligible consenting patients on one ward and computerized reminders to physicians on a second ward. A third ward served as a control group. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria and accepted vaccination in the standing orders arm versus 35 patients in the computerized reminder arm. Vaccination rates on the standing orders ward included 98% of those eligible and accepting vaccination, 73% of eligible patients, and 28% of all patients admitted. Rates on the computerized reminder ward were 23%, 15%, and 7%, respectively. All of the rates from the standing orders ward were significantly greater than those from the computerized reminder ward (P < .0001). Only 0.6% of all patients on the control arm were vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Although both interventions were effective in increasing inpatient pneumococcal vaccination rates relative to baseline practice, physician independent initiation of standing orders was clearly more effective.     

How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under‐screened women in NSW?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a direct mail-out campaign to increase Pap screening rates in women who have not had a test in 48 months. METHODS: Ninety thousand under-screened women were randomised to be mailed a 48-month reminder letter to have a Pap test (n=60,000), or not to be mailed a letter (n=30,000). Differences in Pap test rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, by chi2 tests of significance between Pap test rates in letter versus no-letter groups, and by proportional hazards regression modelling of predictors of a Pap test with letter versus no-letter as the main study variable. T-tests were conducted on mean time to Pap test to assess whether time to Pap test was significantly different between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: After 90 days following each mail-out, Pap test rates in the letter group were significantly higher than in the non-letter group, by approximately two percentage points. After controlling for potential confounders, the hazard ratio of a Pap test within 90 days of a mail-out in the letter group was 1.5 compared with 1.0 in the no-letter group. Hazard ratios of having a Pap test within 90 days decreased significantly with time since last Pap test (p<0.0001); were significantly higher than 1.0 for most non-metropolitan areas of NSW compared with metropolitan areas; and increased significantly with age (p<0.0001). Pap test hazard ratios were not associated with socio-economic status of area of residence, but the hazard ratio was significantly higher than 1.0 if the reminder letter was sent after the Christmas/New Year break. No significant differences in mean time to Pap test were found between the letter and no-letter groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Being sent a reminder letter is associated with higher Pap testing rates in under-screened women.     

Predictors of influenza vaccination in an urban community during a national shortage

Little is known about the impact of vaccine shortages on vaccination rates among disadvantaged populations in the United States. We compared factors associated with influenza vaccination rates during a vaccine shortage (2004-2005) and a non-shortage (2003-2004) year among adults in predominantly minority New York City neighborhoods. Thirty-one percent of participants received influenza vaccine during the non-shortage year compared with 18% during the shortage. While fewer people received the influenza vaccine during the shortage, a higher proportion of the vaccinated were in a high-risk group (68% vs. 52%, respectively). People were less likely to have been vaccinated during the shortage if they were Black. This study suggests that vaccination rates were lower during the shortage period among Blacks and those who are not explicitly a focus of national vaccination outreach campaigns. Such groups are less likely to be vaccinated when vaccines are scarce.     

Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening

BACKGROUND: Mammography is the primary method used for breast cancer screening. However, compliance with recommended screening practices is still below acceptable levels. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of five combinations of physician recommendation and telephone or in-person individualized counseling strategies for increasing compliance with mammography. METHODS: There were 808 participants who were randomly assigned to one of six groups. A logistic regression model with compliance as the dependent variable and group as the independent variable was used to test for significant differences and a ratio of cost to improvement in mammogram compliance evaluated the cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Three of the interventions (in-person, telephone plus letter, and in-person plus letter) had significantly better compliance rates compared with the control, physician letter, or telephone alone. However, when considering costs, only one emerged as the superior strategy. The cost-effectiveness ratios for the five interventions show that telephone-plus-letter is the most cost-effective strategy, achieving a 35.6% mammography compliance at a marginal cost of $0.78 per 1% increase in women screened. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored phone prompt and physician reminder is an effective and economical intervention to increase mammography. Future research should confirm this finding and address its applicability to practice.