INTERACTION OF THYROTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AND THE ENKEPHALIN ANALOGUE DAMME ON PITUITARY HORMONE SECRETION

Because TRH counteracts the inhibitory effect of opiate peptides on LH secretion in cultured cells from normal pituitaries, six normal postmenopausal women were studied to determine whether TRH interacts in vivo with opioid peptides in the regulation of pituitary hormone secretion. At two different times a constant 3 h infusion of either saline or TRH (5 micrograms/min) was initiated. At 60 min a 250 micrograms bolus of the opiate agonist peptide D-Ala2-MePhe4-met-enkephalin-0-ol (DAMME) was injected in one of the two saline and TRH infusion tests. The four treatments, i.e. saline infusion alone, saline infusion with a DAMME bolus, TRH infusion alone; and TRH infusion with DAMME bolus were given at random with an interval of at least 7 d. Blood samples were taken every 15 min during the 3 h study. DAMME induced a significant fall (P less than 0.05) in serum LH (from 35 +/- 8.5 to 18.3 +/- 5.1 mIU/ml) (mean +/- SEM) without significantly affecting FSH levels (from 29 +/- 11.2 to 26.9 +/- 12.4 mIU/ml). These changes were not antagonized by the continuous infusion of TRH. PRL had a monophasic response pattern to continuous isolated TRH infusion; the basal levels increased from 4.2 +/- 1.2 to 24.5 +/- 6.8 ng/ml at 30 min and then slowly decreased with a plateau from 90 min until the end of the study. DAMME administration at 60 min induced a significant second peak of PRL secretion (44 +/- 6.5 ng/ml) 30 min later (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, TRH, and dopamine on prolactin secretion in estrogen-primed postmenopausal women

Prolactin secretion is influenced by at least three important hypothalamic neurotransmitters: TRH, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and dopamine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether, in estradiol-primed postmenopausal women, the PRL response to TRH, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, and dopamine differed. Ten postmenopausal women were studied during treatment with estradiol benzoate at a dose of 0.625 mg per day during 15 days. TRH (200 micrograms iv), saline infusion, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (75 micrograms infused iv during 15 min), coadministration of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and TRH, and dopamine (4 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 iv for 3 h) were administered for 5 consecutive days before and during the last 5 days of estradiol benzoate treatment. Before estradiol benzoate administration, the PRL, response to TRH was significantly greater than that of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Estradiol benzoate treatment increased significantly the PRL release induced by TRH (p less than 0.01), but did not modify the response to vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. At the end of estradiol benzoate treatment, the maximal increase in PRL after the combined (vasoactive intestinal polypeptide + TRH) test was greater than that obtained with TRH alone and occurred earlier (p less than 0.04). Dopamine suppressed PRL secretion to a similar extent after estradiol benzoate treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

MATERNAL SERUM PROLACTIN AND ITS RESPONSE TO TRH IN NORMAL AND COMPLICATED EARLY PREGNANCY

Maternal serum prolactin levels (PRL) were measured by radioimmunoassay in thirty-four women with either normal or complicated early pregnancy. The basal PRL level (mean +/- S.D.) of 33.4 +/- 16.4 ng/ml in normal pregnancy (n = 15) was similar to the level of 32.7 +/- 18.8 ng/ml in threatened abortion (n = 11) and 32.8 +/- 16.9 ng/ml in hyperemesis gravidarum (n = 8). Two patients, one with blighted ovum and the other with subsequent spontaneous abortion, demonstrated PRL levels lower than the range of 20-63 ng/ml in the control group. The PRL response to 200 microgram of synthetic thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) administered intravenously was similar throughout the patient groups. The basal level of PRL in the whole series was more closely related to the level of serum oestradiol (r = 0.778, P less than 0.001) than to that of serum progesterone (r = 0.442, P less than 0.05). However the increments of PRL following TRH administration did not correlate with either oestradiol or progesterone.     

Does bromocriptine block thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced prolactin release during pregnancy?

PRL responses to 200 microgram of iv TRH were measured in 16 healthy women with normal early pregnancy before and at the endo of bromocriptine treatment of 5.0--7.5 mg daily for 1--2 weeks. Before the start of bromocriptine, TRH caused a PRL elevation from 19.1 +/- 2.2 to 95.2 +/- 12.6 ng/ml (mean +/- SE) after 20 min, with a mean maximal PRL increment of 71.7 +/- 11.6 ng/ml. Bromocriptine suppressed basal plasma PRL level to 3.6 +/- 0.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.001). TRH then caused a PRL rise to 18.8 +/- 1.8 ng/ml at 20 min, with a mean maximal PRL increment of 15.7 +/- 1.8 ng/ml. The absolute PRL response was significantly smaller (P less than 0.001) during bromocriptine intake than before, whereas the mean percent increments in PRL levels after TRH administration were similar in the presence and absence of bromocriptine. Fifteen of these women were restudied with TRH stimulation 4--6 weeks after legal abortion, and the PRL responses to TRH were normal. When 7 of these women were once again treated with bromocriptine and retested with TRH, no absolute or relative PRL response to TRH emerged. These results release differs between the pregnant and nonpregnant states.     

Age-related differences in the spontaneous and thyrotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated release of prolactin and thyrotropin in ovariectomized rats

Effect of estradiol on the spontaneous and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated release of prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) in young and aged ovariectomized (Ovx) rats was investigated. Old (22-26 months) and young (3 months) female rats were Ovx 3 weeks before use. They were injected subcutaneously with estradiol benzoate (EB, 25 micrograms/kg) or sesame oil for 3 days and were catheterized via the right jugular vein. Twenty hours after the last administration of EB, rats were injected with TRH (10 micrograms/kg) through the catheter. Blood samples were collected before and 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 min after TRH injection. On the day following blood sampling, all rats were decapitated. The anterior pituitary glands (APs) were excised, and incubated with or without TRH (10 ng/ml) at 37 degrees C for 30 min. The basal level of PRL concentration in plasma samples was 5-fold higher in old Ovx rats than in young Ovx rats. Five min after TRH injection, the increase in plasma PRL was greater in old animals than in young animals. Plasma PRL remained higher in old animals than in young animals at 10, 20, 40 and 60 min following TRH challenge. Administration of EB to old and to young Ovx rats produced increases in both basal and TRH-stimulated secretions of PRL, but did not affect the difference in plasma PRL patterns between old and young animals. The release of PRL from APs was increased significantly in all rats after a 30-min incubation with TRH. In Ovx rats injected with oil, the basal release of PRL in vitro was increased with age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Regulation of prolactin secretion in patients with Cushing's disease. A comparative study on the effects of dexamethasone, lysine vasopressin and ACTH on prolactin secretion by the rat pituitary gland in vitro

In 15 untreated patients with Cushing's disease the regulation of prolactin (PRL) was evaluated. Plasma PRL was 11.5 +/- 4.8 vs. 5.3 +/- 3.6 ng/ml (patients with Cushing's disease vs. control; mean +/- S.D.; p less than 0.001). The maximal increment of plasma PRL in response to TRH was 32.3 +/- 17.3 vs. 27.9 +/- 17.2 ng/ml (NS); the maximal increment of plasma PRL in response to an insulin-induced hypoglycemia was 3.8 +/- 4.6 vs. 22.7 +/- 12.4 ng/ml (p less than 0.001). Additionally the effect of dexamethasone, lysine vasopressin and ACTH on the secretion of PRL by rat pituitary glands in vitro was studied. Dexamethasone (1.25--10 microM) inhibited the secretion of PRL. However, in the presence of dexamethasone modulation of PRL release by TRH and dopamine remained unaltered. Lysine vasopressin (5 nM - 5 microM) and ACTH (0.5--12.5 microM) did not have a direct effect on PRL release by normal rat pituitary glands in vitro and these substances also did not interfere with dopamine-mediated inhibition of PRL release. Conclusions: In Cushing's disease the PRL responses to TRH (normal) and to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (blunted) are differentially affected. Therefore, hypercortisolism probably selectively interferes with the regulation of PRL secretion at a suprahypophyseal level. It is concluded that TRH and dopamine regulate PRL release at sites which are not under corticosteroid regulation, while corticosteroids modulate PRL secretion in response to stress.     

Effects of CNS dopamine augmentation on stimulated prolactin secretion.

The site, hypothalamic and/or pituitary, for dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin (PRL) secretion is unknown. Consequently, the effect of central dopamine (DA) augmentation on stimulated PRL release was determined in 5 healthy men. Regular insulin (o.1 U/kg i.v.), a potent central stimulus for PRL secretion, and TRH, a direct hypophyseal stimulus, were given alone or one hour after the third and fourth doses, respectively, of L-dopa plus the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, carbidopa (Sinemet 20/200 or 25/250 every 6 hours). PRL increased from 26.6 +/- 5.8 to 48.8 +/- 5.2 ng/ml (p less than 0.01) 40 minutes after insulin administration. In contrast, during Sinemet therapy the hypoglycemia-mediated PRL release did not occur, and the PRL levels were significantly lower than after insulin alone from 40 through 180 minutes. Following TRH, neither the maximal PRL rise (69.3 +/- 3.2, TRH alone vs 48.7 +/- 19.8 ng/ml, TRH + Sinemet) nor the maximal increment (37.5 +/- 5.5 vs 29.9 +/- 20.3 ng/ml) was significantly affected by Sinemet. It is concluded that central DA augmentation abolishes central but not peripherally mediated PRL release.     

Effect of gestational mastectomy on postpartum gonadotropin releasing hormone and thyrotropin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone and prolactin response in first lactation Holstein cattle

First lactation Holstein cows were divided into two treatment groups to evaluate thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH, 0.25 microgram/kg body weight) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 200 micrograms) induced secretion of prolactin (PRL) and luteinizing hormone (LH) on days 7 and 16 postpartum. Disregarding treatment, LH response was greater (p less than 0.01) on day 16 than day 7 postpartum (7.5 +/- 0.3 ng/ml on day 7 vs 10.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml serum on day 16). Mastectomized cattle had similar time for initiation of LH increase, but peak concentrations were achieved later. Peak PRL concentrations were reached 12 to 15 min after injection and returned to baseline within 2.5 h in both groups. However, intact cows had higher (p less than 0.01) mean serum PRL than the mastectomized cows for 1 h following injection. Peak PRL concentration was 83.3 +/- 17.6 ng/ml for mastectomized cows vs 128.0 +/- 24.7 ng/ml for intact cows. It appears that udder removal allows for greater pituitary responsiveness to GnRH but diminishes PRL response to TRH suggesting the mammary gland differentially affects pituitary secretion of LH and PRL.     

EFFECT OF LOW-DOSE DOPAMINE INFUSION ON BASAL AND STIMULATED TSH AND PROLACTIN CONCENTRATIONS IN MAN

Dopamine (DA) infused at pharmacological doses in man inhibits thyrotrophin (TSH) secretion, although the physiological significance of this observation is unclear. The effect of low-dose DA infusion (0.1 microgram/kg/min) on TSH and prolactin (PRL) concentrations during stimulation with thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) in normal male subjects is reported. Six subjects were given intravenous DA or placebo infusions for 165 min on separate days. A bolus of TRH (7.5 micrograms) was given at + 90 min, followed by infusion of the tripeptide (750 ng/min) for 45 min during both DA and placebo studies. In all subjects TRH administration caused a small rise in TSH which was partially inhibited by DA (peak 5.73 +/- 0.85 mU/l vs 4.58 +/- 1.09, P less than 0.05). PRL response to TRH was almost totally inhibited by DA (620 +/- 164 mU/l vs 234 +/- 96, P less than 0.05); integrated TSH and PRL responses to TRH were similarly inhibited by DA. Circulating plasma DA concentration during infusion of the catecholamine was 3.46 +/- 1.00 ng/ml, which is within the range reported in pituitary stalk plasma of other species. These data support the hypothesis that DA is a physiological modulator of TSH secretion in normal man. Major differences in the time course of TSH and PRL responses to TRH, and in the suppressive effect of DA on these responses suggest that there are fundamental differences in stimulus-secretion coupling for TRH and the lactotroph and thyrotroph.     

Hyperprolactinemia induced by an estrogen-progesterone synergy: quantitative and temporal effects of estrogen priming in monkeys

We evaluated the quantitative and temporal characteristics of the estrogen component of an estrogen-progesterone synergy, which can induce hyperprolactinemia in macaques. In Exp I, six groups of monkeys were treated for 2 weeks with various doses of estradiol benzoate (EB), which resulted in peripheral estradiol concentrations of 250-1500 pg/ml, followed by 2 weeks of combined estrogen and progesterone treatment. In each of the groups, regardless of the dosages of estradiol benzoate alone, PRL concentrations remained within normal limits (approximately 18 ng/ml). In contrast, during the subsequent period of combined EB and progesterone therapy, hyperprolactinemia developed. The resultant PRL concentrations were not dependent on the dose of EB administered. In Exp II, three groups of monkeys were treated with EB (25 micrograms/kg) alone for various intervals and subsequently with both EB and progesterone for 14 days. When initiation of progesterone therapy was preceded by a 9- or 6-day period of estrogen priming, PRL concentrations were significantly (P less than 0.05) elevated within 3-4 days; in contrast, when the EB and progesterone treatments were initiated simultaneously, 8 days elapsed before the PRL elevations were significant. In a third experiment, to determine whether decidualized endometrium accounted for the increased PRL levels following estrogen and progesterone treatment, a hysterectomized monkey was treated with EB followed by combined EB and progesterone treatment. The PRL response was not different from that of intact monkeys similarly treated. From these findings we conclude 1) that the estrogen-progesterone synergy promoting PRL secretion is not of endometrial origin; 2) that approximately 1 week of estrogen priming is required for progesterone to induce PRL secretion; 3) and that the mode of action of estrogen is not dose dependent, but, rather, is a threshold effect.     

Decreased growth hormone (GH) response to oral clonidine in endemic cretinism: effect of L-T3 therapy

As GH secretion is dependent upon thyroid hormone availability, the GH responses to clonidine (150 micrograms/m2) and the TSH and PRL response to TRH were studied in eight endemic (EC) cretins (3 hypothyroid, 5 with a low thyroid reserve) before and after 4 days of 100 micrograms of L-T3. Five normal controls (N) were also treated in similar conditions. Both groups presented a marked increase in serum T3 after therapy (N = 515 +/- 89 ng/dl; EC = 647 +/- 149 ng/dl) followed by a decrease in basal and peak TSH response to TRH. However, in the EC patients an increase in serum T4 levels and in basal PRL and peak PRL response to TRH after L-T3 therapy was observed. One hypothyroid EC had a markedly elevated PRL peak response to TRH (330 ng/dl). There were no significant changes in basal or peak GH values to treatment with L-T3 in normal subjects. In the EC group the mean basal plasma GH (2.3 +/- 1.9 ng/ml) significantly rose to 8.8 +/- 3.2 ng/ml and the mean peak response to clonidine (12.7 +/- 7.7 ng/ml) increased to 36.9 +/- 3.1 ng/ml after L-T3. Plasma SM-C levels significantly increased in N from 1.79 +/- 0.50 U/ml to 2.42 +/- 0.40 U/ml after L-T3 (p less than 0.01) and this latter value was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than mean Sm-C levels attained after L-T3 in the EC group (respectively: 1.14 +/- 0.59 and 1.78 +/- 0.68 U/ml). These data indicate that in EC the impaired GH response to a central nervous system mediated stimulus, the relatively low plasma Sm-C concentrations, and the presence of clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism may contribute to the severity of growth retardation present in this syndrome.     

PERIFUSION STUDIES OF BROMOCRIPTINE-TREATED AND UNTREATED MACROPROLACTINOMAS: EFFECTS OF DOPAMINE, BROMOCRIPTINE AND TRH

There have been no detailed in-vitro studies of PRL secretion by human macroprolactinoma cells exposed to bromocriptine (BC) to within a few days of surgical removal. We have studied cells from four such tumours (serum PRL 7.05-247 U/l) and six untreated tumours (serum PRL 4-80.35 U/l) using a perifusion technique. The BC-treated tumours had shown tumour shrinkage and were treated until 40-96 h before surgery, but in one patient serum PRL had not suppressed below 15 U/l despite chronic treatment. Pretreatment serum PRL responses to TRH were blunted in all 10 patients. During perifusion with dopamine (DA, 5 mumol/l) untreated prolactinomas had a higher PRL secretion rate (19.3 +/- 2.7 microU/mg tissue/min, mean +/- SEM) than BC-treated (3.9 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). When DA was removed, PRL secretion from untreated tumours increased to 129.7 +/- 18.7 microU/mg/min, but in three of the BC-treated, little increase occurred. In the fourth (from the patient whose serum PRL had not fully suppressed) PRL secretion increased from 4.4 to 25.6 microU/mg/min after DA withdrawal, and DA and BC dose-related inhibition of PRL was similar to that observed in untreated tumours. TRH (10 ng/ml), without DA, provoked increased PRL release from both untreated (266% basal secretion, n = 3) and BC-treated (298%, n = 3) tumours; this effect was completely inhibited by DA (5 mumol/l). The absence of hormones other than PRL following potassium (55 mmol/l) excluded contaminating normal pituitary. We conclude: (1) The effects of BC on prolactinoma PRL secretion may persist for at least 4 days; (2) partial in-vivo BC resistance can be due to factors other than DA receptor malfunction; (3) the apparent discrepancy between in-vivo and in-vitro TRH responses was consistent with the presence of increased hypothalamic DA tone in vivo; and (4) BC may have differential effects on TRH and DA-controlled PRL pools in the tumourous lactotroph.     

Effect of histamine on basal and TRH/LH-RH-stimulated PRL and LH secretion during different phases of the menstrual cycle in normal women

The neurotransmitter histamine (HA) may participate in the regulation of some pituitary hormones. We, therefore, investigated the effect of HA (50 micrograms/kg body weight/h, infusion 0-240 min) on basal and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) stimulated prolactin (PRL) and LH secretion in 5 normal women during the early follicular and the luteal phases of the same menstrual cycle. HA had no effect on the basal secretion of the two hormones. However, the PRL response to 200 micrograms TRH during the HA infusion was significantly increased compared to the response to a saline control infusion during the early follicular phase (peak responses were 1,902 +/- 398 vs. 1,228 +/- 230 microIU/ml, p less than 0.025) and during the luteal phase (peak responses were 2,261 +/- 335 vs. 1,647 +/- 245 microIU/ml, p less than 0.05). HA potentiated the LH response to 100 micrograms LH-RH during the early follicular phase (peak responses were 37.1 +/- 4.9 vs. 26.9 +/- 4.5 mIU/ml, p less than 0.05) and during the luteal phase (peak responses were 79.3 +/- 22.5 vs. 50.7 +/- 11.4 mIU/ml, p less than 0.025). We, therefore, found HA to have a potentiating effect on TRH/LH-RH-stimulated PRL and LH secretion in women. The results are similar to our previous findings in men, although the potentiating effects of HA were higher in women.     

Effects of disodium EDTA and calcium infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in healthy man

To determine the impact of induced hypo- and hypercalcemia on TRH (400 micrograms)-stimulated TSH and PRL release, healthy subjects (n = 11) were infused with 5% glucose in water (n = 11), disodium EDTA (n = 11), or calcium gluconate (n = 7). TRH was given as an iv bolus 60 min (5% glucose and EDTA) and 120 min (calcium) after initiation of the respective infusion. Basal plasma concentrations of TSH remained unchanged during induced hypo- and hypercalcemia, whereas those of PRL fell during the latter (P less than 0.05). The mean sum of increments (0-90 min) in PRL and TSH was considerably greater during hypocalcemia than during hypercalcemia (PRL, P less than 0.002; TSH, P less than 0.005). The increments in the plasma hormone concentration above basal after iv TRH were increased compared to those in normocalcemia (PRL, 98.4 +/- 37.9 ng/ml; TSH, 38.9 +/- 11.8 microU/ml) during hypocalcemia [PRL, 128 +/- 47.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 46.7 +/- 12.8 microU/ml; (P less than 0.005)], but were impaired during hypercalcemia [PRL, 70.1 +/- 27 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 28.9 +/- 8.5 microU/ml (P less than 0.025)]. The mean sum of increments in PRL was related to concentrations of both serum calcium (r = -0.59; P less than 0.01) and PTH (r = 0.51; P less than 0.05). A relation was also seen between the incremental responses of TSH and serum calcium (r = -0.52; P less than 0.05), PTH (r = 0.55; P less than 0.01), and phosphorus (r = -0.55; P less than 0.01). We conclude that in healthy man, TRH-mediated release of both PRL and TSH are inversely related to serum calcium concentrations in such a manner that hormone secretion is enhanced by acute hypocalcemia, but blunted by hypercalcemia.     

Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of the circulating renin-angiotensin system on prolactin release in humans

We recently reported that renin, angiotensinogen, and angiotensin-converting enzyme were present in normal human pituitary lactotroph cells and PRL-secreting adenomas. Angiotensin-II and -III have also been shown to modulate PRL release in vitro. The present study was designed to determine whether angiotensin modulates PRL secretion in vivo. In 36 hypertensive patients with widely varying renin levels, active renin and basal PRL levels did not correlate. In 10 normal volunteers, both a sustained infusion of angiotensin-II and a graded infusion of angiotensin-III induced a 2- to 3-fold increase in aldosterone levels, but had no effect on PRL secretion. Administration of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril had no effect on PRL circadian rhythm in 10 normal subjects or on PRL concentrations in 11 patients with PRL-secreting adenomas. Cross-over administration of placebo and captopril did not affect the peak PRL level measured after TRH treatment in 10 hypertensive men (placebo, 43.1 +/- 5.4; captopril, 40.0 +/- 6.2 micrograms/L; P = NS) or the rise in PRL induced by doperidone in 6 normal women (placebo, 129.5 +/- 16.2; captopril, 150.0 +/- 35.7 micrograms/L; P = NS). Further, administration of enalapril for 30 days to 6 hypertensive patients did not alter basal PRL concentrations or the peak concentrations induced by TRH. These data indicate that in humans the circulating renin-angiotensin system does not interact with diurnal PRL release or with the response to TRH or domperidone.     

THE INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROLACTIN AND THYROTROPHIN SECRETION FOLLOWING DOPAMINERGIC BLOCKAGE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA WITHOUT ANY DEMONSTRABLE PITUITARY TUMOUR

PRL, TSH and gonadotrophin responses to the dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, were studied in mildly hyperprolactinaemic patients with normal sella radiology and CT scan. Eleven female patients with basal PRL levels ranging from 23 to 124 ng/ml were challenged with intravenous metoclopramide (10 mg) and on subsequent occasions with TRH (200 micrograms) and LHRH (100 micrograms). On the basis of the PRL secretory pattern following metoclopramide and TRH stimulation, the patients were divided into two groups. Group I comprised six subjects who were PRL non-responsive to TRH and metoclopramide. Group II (five subjects) demonstrated PRL responses to TRH and metoclopramide indistinguishable from female controls. Mean +/- SD basal PRL levels were 68.5 +/- 29.9 ng/ml in Group I and not different in Group II (40.6 +/- 12.0 ng/ml). Basal LH levels were increased in Group II, whereas FSH was increased in Group I. Basal TSH levels were lower in Group I than the controls. Following metoclopramide, Group I patients had an increase in TSH from a basal of 2.4 +/- 0.7 microU/ml to a peak of 5.9 +/- 2.7 microU/ml (P less than 0.005) which occurred at 30 min. TSH values were increased above basal at all time intervals following metoclopramide. In contrast, TSH levels did not change in Group II patients or the controls after metoclopramide administration. Both patient groups had TSH responses to TRH similar to the controls. Following LHRH, the LH increase was greater in Group II and the FSH in Group I. In neither group nor the controls did gonadotrophin levels change after metoclopramide. In Group II females, PRL responsiveness to metoclopramide was associated with TSH non-responsiveness. In Group I females, PRL levels failed to rise, whereas TSH increased. The PRL and TSH profile in Group I females is typical of a prolactinoma. It is concluded that PRL as well as TSH determinations following metoclopramide are useful indices in the assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and may be of value in differentiating the functional state from that of a pituitary tumour.     

Prolactin secretion in acromegalic patients before and after selective adenomectomy

PRL secretion before and after transsphenoidal adenomectomy was studied in 13 patients with acromegaly. Six patient had elevated basal serum PRL levels before surgery, while 7 patients had normal levels. In every patient, the basal serum GH level decreased to less than 5.0 ng/ml after surgery. In the group (group A) with high basal serum PRL levels (mean +/- SD, 41.3 +/- 5.8 ng/ml) before surgery, the PRL levels decreased significantly (P less than 0.0002) to less than 10.0 ng/ml (4.8 +/- 3.6 ng/ml) after the operation. However, in the group (group B) with normal levels (10.8 +/- 4.4 ng/ml) before surgery, PRL levels changed little (7.8 +/- 3.1 ng/ml) after the operation. In group A, the increment of PRL after TRH injection decreased or disappeared (P less than 0.02; 4.1 +/- 2.4 ng/ml) after surgery compared with that before surgery (39.2 +/- 25.9 ng/ml). On the other hand, in group B, the increment of PRL after TRH injection was nearly unchanged (17.1 +/- 7.0 ng/ml) after surgery compared with that before surgery (19.3 +/- 8.0 ng/ml). The results indicate that PRL is secreted from the pituitary adenoma in acromegalic patients with hyperprolactinemia, while PRL secretion from the normal part of the pituitary gland is decreased.     

Subnormal prolactin responsiveness to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in women with primary empty sella syndrome

Basal prolactin (PRL) levels and PRL responsiveness to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) were studied in 10 women with primary empty sella (PES) syndrome (mean age 38.2 yr). Hyperprolactinemia (34 to 72 ng/ml) was found in 5 patients (hyperprolactinemic PES, H-PES), whereas 5 patients showed normal (9.5 to 19 ng/ml) PRL levels (normoprolactinemic PES, N-PES). The results were compared with those obtained in 10 healthy women (mean age 32.8 yr, PRL = 7 to 15 ng/ml) and in 8 women with a PRL-secreting pituitary microadenoma (MA) (mean age 37.5 yr, PRL = 39 to 85 ng/ml). The mean basal levels of PRL were significantly higher in patients with H-PES (50.8 +/- 13.2 ng/ml) or MA (64.0 +/- 18.3 ng/ml) than in the control group (10.9 +/- 2.6 ng/ml, p less than 0.02) and in the patients with N-PES (13.9 +/- 3.7 ng/ml, p less than 0.02). In contrast, the relative maximum response (RMR) of PRL to TRH (peak PRL/basal PRL) was significantly lower in the patients with PES (both H-PES and N-PES) or MA (1.4 +/- 0.4, 2.3 +/- 0.7 and 1.2 +/- 0.2, respectively) than in the control subjects (3.6 +/- 1.1; p less than 0.02, less than 0.05 and less than 0.02, respectively). Our results show that the pituitary responsiveness to the acute stimulation with TRH is significantly decreased both in patients with a PRL-secreting pituitary MA and in those with PES. Therefore, the clinical value of the TRH test in distinguishing the PES syndromes from prolactinomas seems to be questionable.     

THE INTERACTION OF TRH AND DOPAMINERGIC MECHANISMS IN THE REGULATION OF STIMULATED PROLACTIN RELEASE IN MAN

The manner by which dopaminergic and TRH mechanisms interact to control PRL release is not known. Whilst dopamine receptor antagonists and TRH both release PRL, it is not known if the PRL released by these two mechanisms reflects similar aspects of physiological control, or if PRL responses to these mechanisms of release can be dissociated. We addressed this question by studying the PRL responses to maximal stimulatory dose of TRH and domperidone (a DA receptor antagonist), which were administered sequentially, simultaneously or separately on different occasions. Six normal volunteers undertook three sets of studies: (1) standard PRL stimulation tests to 400 micrograms TRH, 5 mg domperidone or simultaneous TRH/domperidone administration, (2) domperidone bolus-infusion study in which either 5 mg domperidone or 400 micrograms TRH was administered i.v. at 120 min during a 240 min infusion of domperidone (50 micrograms/min) which was preceded by a 5 mg i.v. bolus of the drug, and (3) TRH bolus-infusion study in which domperidone or TRH was administered i.v. at 120 min during a 240 min infusion of TRH (0.4 micrograms/min) which was preceded by a 400 micrograms i.v. bolus of the drug. In Study 1, simultaneous TRH/domperidone administration induced an incremental rise in PRL (5195 +/- 940 mIU/l) which was significantly greater (P less than 0.0005) than with either domperidone (3730 +/- 825 mIU/l) or TRH (1335 +/- 300 mIU/l) alone. In study 2, TRH administration at 120 min resulted in a significant rise (P less than 0.01) in PRL (delta PRL 960 +/- 232 mIU/l) whilst the second dose of domperidone did not, thus suggesting that the initial bolus and subsequent infusion had resulted in complete DA receptor blockade. In Study 3, domperidone administered at 120 min induced a marked rise in PRL (delta PRL 3609 +/- 963 mIU/l). In contrast, the corresponding TRH stimulus resulted in a small rise (delta PRL 142 +/- 32 mIU/l) suggesting that the PRL release induced by the initial bolus and subsequent infusion had been near maximal. Thus, TRH is able to induce significant PRL release in the presence of maximal DA receptor blockade, and domperidone, in the presence of maximal TRH stimulation, is also capable of inducing significant PRL release. These observations together with the ability of TRH/domperidone to induce a greater PRL response than either agent alone, suggest that each stimulus has a specific releasing action on a fraction of intracellular PRL which is not accessible to the other.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)