Asthma Programme in Finland: high consensus between general practitioners and pulmonologists on the contents of an asthma referral letter.

AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to define quality criteria for an asthma referral letter using a national co-operative effort between general practitioners and pulmonologists. METHODS: A consensus-seeking expert panel representing primary and secondary health care merged evidence from the literature and existing national and local asthma programmes to produce 19 provisional criteria to be included in an asthma referral letter. These criteria were contained within a national questionnaire review which was sent out to groups of Finnish physicians. The target groups for the review were all chief pulmonologists in specialist care (n = 32), and representatives of all Finnish health centres (n = 283) - either the chief physician (n = 143) or the local asthma co-ordinating physician (n = 140). RESULTS: The overall response rate to the national questionnaire study was 75%. The three groups of responding physicians had very similar gradings on the necessity of the 19 provisional criteria, most of which were considered very necessary. 14 final disease-specific criteria for an asthma referral letter were derived as a result of this study. CONCLUSION: The main result of this study is an agreed data set of essential information that needs to be included in an asthma referral letter. Importantly these criteria were developed by general practitioners and pulmonologists together.     

Asthma management and control in the United States: results of the 2009 Asthma Insight and Management survey

Past asthma surveys have shown suboptimal management and control of asthma in the United States. No major survey of asthma management has been conducted since the Third Expert Panel Report for the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of asthma (August 2007). This study was designed to report asthma management and control results from the Asthma Insight and Management survey of U.S. patients and physicians. A telephone-based survey was conducted during 2009 in 2500 patients with asthma, aged ≥12 years, and 309 physicians (104 allergists, 54 pulmonologists, 101 family practitioners, and 50 internists). Patients' asthma control perceptions (71% "completely controlled" or "well controlled") were inconsistent with their NAEPP control level as determined by self-reported symptoms (29% well controlled). Patients and physicians had low expectations for effective asthma management; patients considered asthma well managed if rescue medication was used three times per week (46%), urgent care visits occurred twice per year (67%), or emergency department visits occurred once per year (60%). Asthma-related syncope, seizure, intensive care unit admission, and intubation were associated with uncontrolled asthma based on NAEPP guidelines. Respiratory specialists (allergists/pulmonologists) implemented asthma management recommendations more than other physicians surveyed. However, only 22% of patients visited a specialist for usual asthma care and 48% had never visited a specialist. Despite detailed NAEPP guidance, asthma management and control in U.S. patients is unsatisfactory. Improved asthma control assessment (impairment and risk) and implementation of NAEPP management recommendations are needed to improve asthma control and outcomes.     

Patient and physician asthma deterioration terminology: results from the 2009 Asthma Insight and Management survey

Long-term achievement of asthma control is dependent in part on the use of mutually understandable asthma terminology in all verbal and written patient-physician communications. Using data from the Asthma Insight and Management (AIM) survey, the objective of this analysis is to provide a contemporary depiction of asthma deterioration terminology as used by current asthma patients and physicians in the United States. As part of the 2009 AIM survey, current asthma patients (≥12 years of age; weighted n = 2499) and physicians (n = 309) were queried about their recognition, understanding, and/or use of the terms "asthma attack," "asthma flare-up," and "asthma exacerbation" in telephone interviews. Nearly all patients had heard the term "asthma attack" (97%), but relatively few had heard the term "asthma exacerbation" (24%); 71% had heard "asthma flare-up." In contrast, physicians reported using the term "asthma attack" least (65%) and the term "asthma exacerbation" most (77%) when discussing asthma with their patients; 70% reported using "asthma flare-up." Among patients familiar with "asthma flare-up" and "asthma exacerbation" (n = 502), only 38% said that the terms mean the same thing; nearly all physicians (94%) said that the terms mean the same thing. Collectively, data from the AIM survey suggest that patients and physicians use different asthma deterioration terminology and, more importantly, that they do not necessarily understand each other's terms. Standardizing asthma deterioration terminology may help optimize asthma patient-physician communication to improve patient understanding of written asthma action plans and therefore, enhance patient outcomes.     

Asthma control,cost and race: results from a national survey

Abstract

Objective: Although interventions have been shown to alleviate symptoms in most patients suffering from asthma, only one-third of asthma patients have disease that is well-controlled. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether partly and uncontrolled asthmas are associated with increased costs for asthma-related healthcare utilization compared to well-controlled asthma and to determine whether these associations differed across racial groups. Methods: We classified respondents from the Asthma Insights and Management survey into those with well-, partly and uncontrolled asthma and compared utilization of healthcare services and costs among these groups, as well as between whites and non-whites. Results: Respondents categorized as having asthma that was not well-controlled reported lower income levels, higher rates of unemployment and more trouble paying for healthcare; similar results were found in analyses stratified by race. Patients whose asthma was partly or uncontrolled had greater use of asthma-related medications and medical services compared to patients whose asthma was well-controlled. Total unadjusted and adjusted costs were greater in patients whose asthma was classified as partly and uncontrolled. Similar results were found in analyses stratified on race. Across all levels of asthma control, non-whites had higher rates of utilization of emergency rooms and urgent care facilities and had greater rates of hospitalizations compared to whites. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that patients with asthma that is not well-controlled utilized more healthcare resources and had greater medical costs, despite lacking of health insurance which may suggest less access to care.     

Hyperlipidaemia management after primary coronary artery bypass surgery: a survey of patients and general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that, in patients with increased cholesterol concentrations and vascular disease, decreasing the cholesterol concentration significantly reduces the risk of coronary events. After coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), the risk of further coronary events is likely to be reduced if there is effective control of cholesterol concentrations. The aim of the survey was to review awareness among general practitioners and patients of the need for maintenance of serum cholesterol values, frequency of serum cholesterol checks, dietary advice and lipid-decreasing medication in patients after CABG. METHODS: Hospital notes of 200 patients who underwent primary, coronary artery bypass surgery from January 1994 to 1996 were examined and postal questionnaires sent to patients and their general practitioners inquiring whether they had had their serum cholesterol tested in the past 3 years; whether dietary advice had been given if cholesterol concentrations were increased to more than 5.2 mmol/l; whether a repeat serum cholesterol test was performed 3 months later if values were greater than 5.2 mmol/l; and (for those with serum cholesterol values greater than 5.2 mmol/l), whether they were on lipid-decreasing medication. RESULTS: We considered 146 (76%) replies to be complete. Hospital and general practitioner records of these patients showed, that in the previous 3 years, after CABG, only 63% (n=92) had their serum lipid profile checked and, of these, 74% (n=68) had increased serum cholesterol concentrations of more than 5.2 mmol/l. Only 46% (n=31) received dietary advice alone. After dietary advice had been given, serum cholesterol was rechecked in 26% (n=8) of patients and only 3% (n=1) had a decrease in serum cholesterol to less than 5.2 mmol/l. Among the patients with increased serum cholesterol, 50% (n=34) received lipid-decreasing medication, but serum cholesterol was rechecked in only 52% (n=17) of patients. In 9% (n=3) of these, serum cholesterol concentrations had decreased to less than 5.2 mmol/l. Among the 146 complete replies from patients, 95% (n=139) indicated that control of serum cholesterol was important, 82% (n=120) had received dietary advice and 39% (n=57) were on lipid-decreasing medication. CONCLUSION: General practitioners and patients were generally aware of cholesterol control after CABG. However, a relatively low proportion of patients underwent serum cholesterol checks and received documented dietary advice, lipid-decreasing medication, or both. Dietary advice alone may be inadequate in controlling lipid concentrations and, in many cases, needed to be supplemented with adequate lipid-decreasing therapy.     

Asthma control in Canada remains suboptimal: The Reality of Asthma Control (TRAC) study

BACKGROUND:

Two Canadian studies showed that 55% of patients with asthma had daily symptoms (in 1996) and that 57% of patients suffered from poorly controlled asthma (in 1999).

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the state of asthma control of adult Canadians, and asthma knowledge and practices of Canadian physicians actively involved in the care of patients with asthma.

METHODS:

Telephone interviews were conducted with adults 18 to 54 years of age who had been diagnosed with asthma at least six months before the survey, who did not have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and who had a smoking history of fewer than 20 pack-years. Physicians were surveyed by telephone and mail. The surveys took place between April and August 2004.

RESULTS:

Almost all (97%) of the 893 patients believed that they had controlled asthma; however, only 47% had controlled disease according to symptom-based guideline criteria. Just 39% of 463 physicians based their treatment recommendations on the Canadian asthma guidelines most or all of the time, despite having a high awareness of them. Only 11% of patients had written action plans, and one-half of patients with action plans did not use them regularly. Almost three-quarters of patients expressed concerns about taking inhaled corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS:

Since the last major national survey, guideline implementation has not resulted in significant changes in asthma-related morbidity. Effective means of knowledge transfer should be developed and implemented to improve the translation of guideline recommendations into care.     

Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire: factorial validity,reliability and correspondence in assessing status and change in asthma control

Objective: This study examined the factor structures and reliabilities of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7; ACQ-6) and the correspondence between them in assessing both level and change in asthma control. Methods: Lung function and questionnaire data for ACT and ACQ were assessed in 113 asthma patients at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of inpatient rehabilitation. Confirmatory factor analyses, composite reliability coefficients, Pearson correlations, Cohen’s Kappa and positive/negative agreements were computed. Results: Unidimensional factor structure was confirmed for ACT. For ACQ configural invariance (i.e. same factor structure) over time could not be established. Furthermore, in ACQ-7, FEV1 showed no relation to the latent factor. Reliability estimates were 0.86–0.88 (ACT), 0.88–0.92(ACQ-6) and 0.81–0.86 (ACQ-7). Pearson correlations between ACT and ACQ were between 0.75 and 0.90 and tended to be higher at T2. If the aim is to identify patients with either not well-controlled asthma or change in asthma control, concordance was at least moderate (Kappa?=?0.52–0.72). Correspondence tended to be lower in identifying patients with well-controlled asthma (Kappa?=?0.30–0.79). In some circumstances, ACQ-6 showed higher agreement with ACT than did ACQ-7. Conclusions: ACT is a unidimensional measure, but factor structure of ACQ remains unclear. Correspondence between ACT and ACQ depends on the aim of the assessment. Including FEV1 in the assessment of asthma control level even lowers reliability of ACQ and concordance with ACT. Our results support GINA (2014) in conceptualizing FEV1 as a risk factor for poor asthma outcome instead of an indicator of level of asthma control.     

Joint and soft tissue injections: a survey of general practitioners

OBJECTIVES: To determine the type of joint and soft tissue injections carried out by general practitioners (GPs) in the Bath area and factors affecting activity. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 360 GPs requesting information on injections carried out during the previous 12 months, referral pathways for injection, barriers to injecting and training. RESULTS: We received 251 replies. The commonest injections were for tennis elbow, glenohumeral joint, knee, supraspinatus tendonitis and carpal tunnel. The majority of GPs (66.4%) carry out most injections themselves, 26.3% refer to a colleague and 7.3% refer to secondary care. Over half (51%) of all the injections are carried out by 15.6% of the GPs. Factors associated with higher levels of injection activity were: male gender, partnership, more than 10 years' experience, a special interest in rheumatology or orthopaedics and working in a rural or mixed practice. The most important barriers to carrying out injections were lack of practical training, lack of confidence and inability to maintain skills. Most GPs have been trained on models. CONCLUSIONS: Most GPs carry out some joint and soft tissue injections, but limit themselves to knees, shoulders and elbows. A small highly active group receive referrals from colleagues. Gender and specialist training strongly influence activity. Many, especially female and part-time, GPs find it hard to maintain their skills and confidence. Training targeted at this group, based in practices and using models and other tools, is likely to increase the number of patients receiving timely injections in general practice.     

Shadowland: general practitioners and the treatment of opiate-abusing patients

A number of calls have recently been made for general practitioners to become more closely involved in the treatment of opiate abusing patients. At present, however, very little is known of the sorts of problems general practitioners will face in working within what is held to be a very difficult area. The research reported in this paper aimed to explore the experience of a group of general practitioners currently being consulted by such patients. A combination of enhanced records and semi-structured interviews were used to collect detailed information on 50 consultations with opiate abusers. It is revealed that these doctors were experiencing a good deal of difficulty in sustaining a therapeutic role for themselves in relation to these patients. The nature of these difficulties, and their basis, are examined and recommendations are made as to how these difficulties may be resolved in the future.     

Asthma burden in the United States: results of the 2009 Asthma Insight and Management survey

Updated guidelines and new treatments for asthma have become available since the last major survey of asthma management in the United States was completed ～11 years ago. The Asthma Insight and Management (AIM) survey was conducted to assess the current status of asthma burden in the United States. A geographically stratified screening of 60,682 households provided a national sample of 2500 patients with current asthma (2186 adults aged ≥18 years; 314 adolescents aged 12-17 years). A national sample of 1004 adults without current asthma was interviewed for comparison with the adult asthma population, and 309 asthma health care providers were surveyed for their opinions about the burden of asthma. Asthma prevalence in the United States was estimated at 8%. Twice as many adult asthma patients rated their health as "only fair," "poor," or "very poor," or experienced limitations in activity because of health problems, compared with the general population. Asthma also frequently caused negative emotional symptoms in patients. Most patients experienced asthma throughout the year (63%) and symptoms within the 4 weeks before the summer survey (68%). Overall, 41% of patients responded that asthma interfered with their/their child's life "some" or "a lot". During the year before the survey, 69% of patients experienced at least one severe asthma episode. Asthma burden in the United States remains high despite the availability of updated treatment guidelines and new therapies. Asthma care in the United States remains suboptimal, indicating the need for continued improvements in patient management.     

International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): prevalence of asthma and asthma-related symptoms among Brazilian schoolchildren.

We have studied the prevalence of asthma and its symptoms using a standard written questionnaire (WQ) designed for the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC). The WQ (questions 1 through 8 related to asthma) was applied to 13,604 children aged 6-7 years from six Brazilian cities: Porto Alegre (South, N = 2,976), Curitiba (South, N = 1,664), S?o Paulo (Southeast, N = 3,005), Uberlandia (Southeast, N = 3,002), Itabira (Southeast, N = 1,551) and Recife (Northeast, N = 1,406). At the age of 13-14 years the WQ was applied to 20,554 schoolchildren living in Porto Alegre (South, N = 3,198), Curitiba (South, N = 3,008), S?o Paulo (Southeast, N = 3,008), Uberlandia (Southeast, N = 3,001), Itabira (Southeast, N = 2,134), Salvador (Northeast, N = 3,119) and Recife (Northeast, N = 3,086). The parents of the younger children answered the WQ, whereas the adolescents answered the questionnaire themselves. The response rates were 72% and 93% for the 6-7-year-old children and for the 13-14-year-old children, respectively. There was a slight predominance of male children in the population studied. In the group of 6-7-year-olds, the prevalence of physician diagnosed asthma was 7.3% for boys and 4.9% for girls: in the group of 13-14-year-olds the rates were 9.8% and 10.2%, respectively. Asthma severity was similar for both age groups, and wheezing following exercise was more frequent among the adolescents. In keeping with studies from other parts of the world, comparison between reported symptoms and diagnosed asthma revealed a significantly lower frequency of diagnosed asthma, suggesting that in the study population, asthma is underdiagnosed.     

International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) written questionnaire: validation of the asthma component among Brazilian children.

Written questionnaires have been widely used in epidemiological studies of asthma. However, when translated to another language, they must be validated. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) written questionnaire had been previously validated by a comprehensive study, but this had not been done in Brazil. Our objective was to validate the asthma component of the ISAAC self-applicable written questionnaire following its translation to Portuguese. A group of 10 pediatricians and 10 pediatric allergists graded the questions from 0 to 2, and established a maximum score for each question. The questionnaire was answered by parents or guardians of asthmatic children, aged 6 to 7 years old (n = 26) and of nonasthmatic control children of the same age (n = 26); and by asthmatic (n = 33) and nonasthmatic (n = 33) adolescents, aged 13 to 14 years. Half of these individuals responded to the same questionnaire after 2 to 4 weeks. This second response allowed the evaluation of the reproducibility of the ISAAC questionnaire. The maximum global score possible was 14, and cut-off levels of 5 and 6 were found for the groups of 6 to 7 and 13 to 14 year olds, respectively. There was significant agreement between the adolescents' responses to the questionnaire and those from their parents or guardians (74.3%); however, significant discordance was observed for individual questions including "wheezing with exercise." In both age periods the questionnaire was significantly reproducible (Kappa test) (6 to 7 year olds Kw = 1; 13 to 14 year olds Kw = 0.89). In conclusion, the asthma component of the ISAAC written questionnaire was proven to be reproducible, adequate and able to differentiate between asthmatics and controls. Adolescents answered the questionnaire appropriately, however the results suggest that adolescents' parents or guardians underestimate asthma symptoms which interfere little with the adolescent's daily activities.     

Prevalence of asthma symptoms in Latin America: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC)

The prevalence of respiratory symptoms indicative of asthma in children from Latin America has been largely ignored. As part of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), 17 centers in 9 different Latin American countries participated in the study, and data from 52,549 written questionnaires (WQ) in children aged 13-14 years and from 36,264 WQ in 6-7 year olds are described here. In children aged 13-14 years, the prevalence of asthma ever ranged from 5.5-28%, and the prevalence of wheezing in the last 12 months from 6.6-27%. In children aged 6-7 years, the prevalence of asthma ever ranged from 4.1-26.9%, and the prevalence of wheezing in the last 12 months ranged from 8.6-32.1%. The lower prevalence in centers with higher levels of atmospheric pollution suggests that chronic inhalation of polluted air in children does not contribute to asthma. Furthermore, the high figures for asthma in a region with a high level of gastrointestinal parasite infestation, and a high burden of acute respiratory infections occurring early in life, suggest that these factors, considered as protective in other regions, do not have the same effect in this region. The present study indicates that the prevalence of asthma and related symptoms in Latin America is as high and variable as described in industrialized or developed regions of the world.     

Identification of asthma risk factors in Mexico City in an International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood survey.

The International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood (ISAAC) has assessed the prevalence of asthma, as well as the factors related to the disease in different countries. The aim of this study was to identify asthma risks factors in Mexico City. Data were obtained from questionnaires of children participating in a phase 3b ISAAC survey. Two thousand ninety-eight boys and 2008 girls were recruited in the 6- to 7-year-old group and 3243 boy and 3333 girls were recruited in the 13- to 14-year-old group. Logistic regression was used to determine the asthma risks factors. In the logistic regression for cumulative and current asthma prevalence, the variables allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis were the most important risk factors with the highest odds ratios (OR > 1.5; p < 0.05). The use of antibiotics and paracetamol in the first 12 months of life were related to cumulative asthma in both genders in the 6- to 7-year-old group. Contact of pregnant mother with farm animals was positively related with cumulative asthma in boys in the 6- to 7-year-old group. The main factors associated with the cumulative and current prevalence of asthma in both age groups were atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis. Future interventions for the prevention and early diagnosis and treatment could be focused in the natural history of the atopic march.