Concentration-dependent synergy and antagonism within a triple antifungal drug combination against Aspergillus species: analysis by a new response surface model

Triple antifungal combinations are used against refractory invasive aspergillosis without an adequate understanding of their pharmacodynamic interactions. We initially studied the in vitro triple combination of voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin against Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. terreus by a spectrophotometric microdilution broth method after 48 h of incubation. We then analyzed these results with a recently described nonlinear mixture response surface E(max)-based model modified to assess pharmacodynamic interactions at various growth levels. The new model allows flexibility in all four parameters of the E(max) model and is able to describe complex pharmacodynamic interactions. Concentration-dependent pharmacodynamic interactions were found within the triple antifungal combination. At the 50% growth level, synergy (median interaction indices of 0.43 to 0.82) was observed at low concentrations of voriconazole (<0.03 mg/liter) and amphotericin B (相似文献   

Antifungal interactions within the triple combination of amphotericin B, caspofungin and voriconazole against Aspergillus species

OBJECTIVES: The in vitro effects of caspofungin combined with voriconazole and amphotericin B were tested in triplicate experiments against nine clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus terreus. METHODS: The isolates were tested against a range of concentrations of voriconazole (0.015-1.0 mg/L), caspofungin (0.125-256 mg/L) and five concentrations of amphotericin B (0.1-0.5 mg/L) with a microdilution chequerboard method based on the CLSI M38-A reference method and the results were analysed with the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The effect of individual drugs on the FIC index of each of the double combinations was also evaluated. RESULTS: The triple combination of voriconazole, caspofungin and amphotericin B against all Aspergillus spp. was synergistic (FIC index 0.49-0.57) at low median concentrations of amphotericin B (0.10-0.22 mg/L) and voriconazole (0.07-0.15 mg/L) over a wide range of caspofungin concentrations (4.32-17.28 mg/L). Antagonistic interactions (FIC index 1.65-2.15) were found at higher median concentrations of amphotericin B (0.3-0.5 mg/L) and voriconazole (0.23-0.68 mg/L) over a similarly wide range of caspofungin concentrations (1.47-32 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: These concentration-dependent interactions may have important clinical implications, which require further evaluation in animal models of invasive aspergillosis.     

In Vitro Interactions between Target of Rapamycin Kinase Inhibitor and Antifungal Agents against Aspergillus Species

In vitro interactions of INK128, a target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase inhibitor, and antifungals, including itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin, against Aspergillus spp. were assessed with the broth microdilution checkerboard technique. Our results suggested synergistic effects between INK128 and all azoles tested, against multiple Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus isolates. However, no synergistic effects were observed when INK128 was combined with amphotericin B or caspofungin. No antagonism was observed for any combination.     

In vitro activity of a new triazole BAL4815, the active component of BAL8557 (the water-soluble prodrug), against Aspergillus spp

OBJECTIVES: BAL4815 is the active component of the antifungal triazole agent BAL8557 (the water-soluble prodrug). We compared the in vitro activity of BAL4815 with that of itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin and amphotericin B against 118 isolates of Aspergillus comprising four different species (fumigatus, terreus, flavus and niger); the isolates were pre-selected to include 16 isolates demonstrating in vitro resistance to other agents. METHODS: Susceptibilities were determined for BAL4815, amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole using the microdilution plate modification of the NCCLS M38-A method with RPMI 1640 buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS; for caspofungin the method was modified using incubation in a gas mixture of 1% O2/5% CO2/94% N2 to aid reading. MFCs (> or =99% kill) were also determined for all drugs other than caspofungin. RESULTS: For all isolates, geometric mean (GM) MIC values and ranges (in mg/L) were: BAL4815, 0.620 and 0.125-2.0; itraconazole, 0.399 and 0.063->8.0; voriconazole, 0.347 and 0.125-8.0; caspofungin, 0.341 and 0.125-4.0; amphotericin B, 0.452 and 0.06-4.0. No significant differences in susceptibility to BAL4815 were seen between species and in contrast to itraconazole no isolates demonstrated MICs >2.0 mg/L. For all isolates, GM MFC values and ranges (in mg/L) were: BAL4815, 1.68 and 0.25->8.0; itraconazole, 1.78 and 0.06->8.0; voriconazole, 1.09 and 0.25->8.0; amphotericin B, 0.98 and 0.25->4.0. CONCLUSIONS: BAL4815 demonstrated promising antifungal activity against all four Aspergillus species in vitro including strains resistant to itraconazole, caspofungin or amphotericin B.     

Interactions among amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, ketoconazole, and miconazole against pathogenic fungi in vitro.

Interactions among amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, ketoconazole, and micoconazole were tested for all possible paired and triple drug combinations and all four drugs combined against three isolates of Candida albicans, three Candida spp., two isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans, and three isolates Aspergillus fumigatus. An assay for inhibitory activity was developed in which growth in the presence of an antifungal agent was expressed as a percentage of the growth in drug-free cultures. For nearly all of the antifungal combinations, the interaction was additive against most fungal isolates. Drug combinations that included amphotericin B and ketoconazole were most often synergistic, i.e., amphotericin plus ketoconazole, amphotericin plus 5-fluorocytosine plus ketoconazole, and amphotericin plus 5-fluorocytosine plus ketoconazole plus miconazole, whereas the combination of ketoconazole plus miconazole showed the strongest tendency towards antagonism. The data in this screening survey provide a basis for further studies of drug interactions in vivo and in vitro.     

Amphotericin B- and Voriconazole-Echinocandin Combinations against Aspergillus spp.: Effect of Serum on Inhibitory and Fungicidal Interactions

Antifungal combination therapy with voriconazole or amphotericin B and an echinocandin is often employed as primary or salvage therapy for management particularly of refractory aspergillosis. The pharmacodynamic interactions of amphotericin B- and voriconazole-based combinations with the three echinocandins caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin in the presence of serum were tested against 15 Aspergillus fumigatus complex, A. flavus complex, and A. terreus complex isolates to assess both their growth-inhibitory and fungicidal activities. The in vitro activity of each drug alone and in combination at a 1:1 fixed concentration ratio was tested with a broth microdilution colorimetric method, and interactions were assessed by isobolographic analysis. Synergy was found for all amphotericin B- and voriconazole-based combinations, with amphotericin B-based combinations showing strong inhibitory synergistic interactions (interaction indices of 0.20 to 0.52) and with voriconazole-based combinations demonstrating strong fungicidal synergistic interactions (interaction indices of 0.10 to 0.29) (P < 0.001). Drug- and species-specific differences were found, with caspofungin and the A. fumigatus complex exhibiting the weakest synergistic interactions. In the presence of serum, the synergistic interactions were reduced in the order (from largest to smallest decrease) micafungin > anidulafungin > caspofungin, and A. flavus complex > A. fumigatus complex > A. terreus complex, resulting in additive interactions, particularly for inhibitory activities of amphotericin B-echinocandin combinations and fungicidal activities of voriconazole-echinocandin combinations. Drug- and species-specific differences were found in the presence of serum for inhibitory activities of antifungal drugs, with the lowest interaction indices being observed for amphotericin B-caspofungin (median, 0.77) and for the A. terreus complex (median, 0.56). The present in vitro data showed that serum had a major impact on synergistic interactions of amphotericin B-echinocandin and voriconazole-echinocandin combinations, resulting in additive interactions and explaining the indifferent outcomes usually observed in vivo.     

In vitro interactions between antifungals and immunosuppressants against Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from transplant and nontransplant patients

We performed in vitro antifungal checkerboard testing on 12 Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates (6 transplant recipients and 6 nontransplant patients) with three antifungal agents (amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin) and three immunosuppressants (FK506, cyclosporine, and rapamycin). We were not able to detect a difference in calcineurin inhibitor antifungal activity against isolates from transplant recipients and nontransplant patients.     

In vitro biofilm characterization and activity of antifungal agents alone and in combination against sessile and planktonic clinical Candida albicans isolates

Thirty clinical isolates of Candida albicans were collected from blood or other sterile site infections. Biofilm dry weight and metabolic activity were measured for each isolate. Planktonic and sessile antifungal susceptibilities of each isolate were determined for amphotericin B deoxycholate, caspofungin, and voriconazole. Sessile susceptibilities were determined for the combination of caspofungin/voriconazole. No significant differences in biofilm dry weight or metabolic activity were found between bloodstream and other invasive isolates. Planktonic MIC90 values and sessile MIC90 (SMIC90) values were 0.25 and 2, 0.06 and >256, and 0.5 and 2 microg/mL for amphotericin, voriconazole, and caspofungin, respectively. The SMIC90 of the combination of caspofungin/voriconazole against sessile isolates was 0.5/2 microg/mL. Therefore, the source of invasive C. albicans clinical isolates did not affect in vitro biofilm formation. Susceptibility to antifungal agents decreased when C. albicans was associated with biofilm, and the combination of caspofungin/voriconazole did not appear to provide enhanced activity compared with caspofungin alone.     

Economic evaluation of targeted treatments of invasive aspergillosis in adult haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the Netherlands: a modelling approach

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a targeted treatment model of antifungal treatment strategies for adult haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients in the Netherlands from a hospital perspective, using a decision analytic modelling approach. METHODS: The economic evaluation of desoxycholate amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin was undertaken. These drugs could be used alone, in various combinations or sequentially. In our model, first-line therapy consisted of either voriconazole or liposomal amphotericin B. If necessary, treatment was switched to a second-line treatment, including combination antifungal therapy. The theoretical population in this model consisted of adult HSCT recipients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis (IA). Long-term survival was extrapolated from survival after 12 weeks of treatment and life expectancy. RESULTS: First-line antifungal treatment strategies with voriconazole were both more effective and less costly over first-line strategies employing liposomal amphotericin B at a dosage of 4 mg/kg/day. The strategy of voriconazole followed by caspofungin (voriconazole/caspofungin) was dominant over the strategies of voriconazole followed by liposomal amphotericin B (voriconazole/liposomal amphotericin B) or desoxycholate amphotericin B (voriconazole/desoxycholate amphotericin B). However, the voriconazole followed by the combination of liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin strategy (voriconazole/liposomal amphotericin B+caspofungin) was more effective though more expensive than the voriconazole/caspofungin strategy resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of about euro107,000 for a life-year saved. At a dosage of 1 mg/kg/day of liposomal amphotericin B, the voriconazole/caspofungin strategy was more effective but more costly than the voriconazole/desoxycholate amphotericin B strategy with an ICER of euro10,000 for each extra life-year saved. Between the voriconazole/liposomal amphotericin B+caspofungin and the voriconazole/caspofungin strategies, the ICER was euro40,000. CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic analyses on net monetary benefit showed that the voriconazole/caspofungin strategy had the highest probability of being the most cost-effective strategy.     

In Vitro Interactions of Antifungal Agents and Tacrolimus against Aspergillus Biofilms

Aspergillus biofilms were prepared from Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus terreus via a 96-well plate-based method, and the combined antifungal activity of tacrolimus with azoles or amphotericin B against Aspergillus biofilms was investigated via a broth microdilution checkerboard technique system. Our results suggest that combinations of tacrolimus with voriconazole or amphotericin B have synergistic inhibitory activity against Aspergillus biofilms. However, combinations of tacrolimus with itraconazole or posaconazole exhibit no synergistic or antagonistic effects.     

Interaction of the Echinocandin Caspofungin with Amphotericin B or Voriconazole against Aspergillus Biofilms In Vitro

Aspergillus biofilms were prepared from 22 strains of Aspergillus spp. via a 96-well plate-based method. Using a broth microdilution checkerboard technique with the XTT [2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] colorimetric assay, we demonstrated a synergistic antifungal activity against 18 of 22 Aspergillus biofilm strains with a combination of caspofungin and amphotericin B and against 13 of 22 strains with a combination of caspofungin and voriconazole. We did not observe antagonism.     

In vitro interaction of flucytosine with conventional and new antifungals against Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates

Combinations of flucytosine with conventional and new antifungals were evaluated in vitro against 30 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Synergy determined by checkerboard analysis was observed with combinations of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin with flucytosine against 77, 60, 80, 77, and 67% of the isolates, respectively. Antagonism was never observed. Killing curves showed indifferent interactions between triazoles and flucytosine and synergy between amphotericin B and flucytosine.     

In Vitro Activities of Nine Antifungal Drugs and Their Combinations against Phialophora verrucosa

The in vitro activities of nine antifungal drugs and their combinations against 31 clinical and 15 environmental Phialophora verrucosa strains were tested. The MIC₉₀/90% minimum effective concentration (MIC/MEC₉₀) values (μg/ml) across all strains were as follows: for terbinafine, 0.25; for posaconazole, 0.5; for voriconazole, 1; for itraconazole, 2; for amphotericin B, 4; for caspofungin and micafungin, 16; and for fluconazole and flucytosine, 64. The highest synergy was shown by the combination of itraconazole plus caspofungin (with synergy against 100% of the 31 clinical strains), followed by amphotericin B plus flucytosine (45.2%) and itraconazole plus terbinafine or micafungin (25.8% or 12.9%, respectively).     

Combined activity in vitro of caspofungin, amphotericin B, and azole agents against itraconazole-resistant clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus

Interactions in vitro between amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin against itraconazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical strains were determined. Differential results were obtained depending on the criteria (MIC or minimal effective concentration) used. Caspofungin and voriconazole exhibited the most potent interactions, with synergy against at least 50% of isolates, and the average fractional concentration index was 0.38. Antagonism was not found for any combination.     

In vitro antifungal combination effects of micafungin with fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine against clinical isolates of Candida species

Micafungin (MCFG) is an echinocandin antifungal agent that exhibits potent activity against most species of Candida and Aspergillus. We investigated the in vitro antifungal combination effects of MCFG with four other antifungal agents — fluconazole (FLCZ), voriconazole (VRCZ), amphotericin B, and flucytosine — against clinical isolates of 54 Candida spp. by checkerboard analysis. The synergistic antifungal effects of MCFG-FLCZ and MCFG-VRCZ were 11% and 15%, respectively, and the latter displayed a synergistic activity of 63% against Candida glabrata. Antagonism was not observed in any of the combinations tested.     

Activity of antifungal combinations against Aspergillus species evaluated by isothermal microcalorimetry

We evaluated the activity of antifungals alone or in combination against Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus terreus by real-time measurement of fungal growth-related heat production. Amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin, and anidulafungin were tested alone or in combination. Heat production was measured in Sabouraud dextrose broth containing 10⁵Aspergillus conidia/mL for 48 h at 37 °C. Antifungal activity was evaluated by measuring the heat detection time relative to the growth control. Against A. fumigatus, the voriconazole-echinocandin combination demonstrated longer heat detection time than each antifungal alone. Against A. terreus, the combination amphotericin B–echinocandin prolonged the heat detection time, compared to each antifungal alone. In contrast, the echinocandin-voriconazole combination did not increase the heat detection time, compared to voriconazole alone. None of the antifungal combinations decreased the heat detection time compared to the antifungals alone (e.g. antagonism was not observed). Microcalorimetry has the potential for real-time evaluation of antifungal combinations against Aspergillus spp.     

Isothermal microcalorimetry: a novel method for real-time determination of antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus species

We evaluated microcalorimetry for real-time susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp. based on growth-related heat production. The minimal heat inhibitory concentration (MHIC) for A. fumigatus ATCC 204305 was 1 mg/L for amphotericin B, 0.25 mg/L for voriconazole, 0.06 mg/L for posaconazole, 0.125 mg/L for caspofungin and 0.03 mg/L for anidulafungin. Agreement within two 2-fold dilutions between MHIC (determined by microcalorimetry) and MIC or MEC (determined by CLSI M38A) was 90% for amphotericin B, 100% for voriconazole, 90% for posaconazole and 70% for caspofungin. This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the potential of isothermal microcalorimetry for growth evaluation of Aspergillus spp. and real-time antifungal susceptibility testing.     

Head-to-head comparison of the activities of currently available antifungal agents against 3,378 Spanish clinical isolates of yeasts and filamentous fungi

We have compared the activities of posaconazole and other currently available antifungal agents against a collection of 3,378 clinical isolates of yeasts and filamentous fungi. A total of 1,997 clinical isolates of Candida spp., 359 of other yeast species, 697 strains of Aspergillus spp., and 325 nondermatophyte non-Aspergillus spp. were included. The average geometric means of the MICs of agents that were tested against Candida spp. were 0.23 microg/ml for amphotericin B, 0.29 microg/ml for flucytosine, 0.97 microg/ml for fluconazole, 0.07 microg/ml for itraconazole, 0.04 microg/ml for voriconazole, 0.15 microg/ml for caspofungin, and 0.03 microg/ml for posaconazole. Voriconazole and posaconazole were active in vitro against the majority of isolates, with resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole, and against Cryptococcus neoformans and other Basidiomycota yeasts. Posaconazole was the most active of antifungal agents tested against Aspergillus spp., with an average geometric mean of 0.10 microg/ml. It was active against Paecilomyces spp., Penicillium spp., Scedosporium apiospermum, and some black fungi, such as Alternaria spp. Multiresistant filamentous fungi, such as Scedosporium prolificans, Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, and Fusarium solani, were also resistant to voriconazole, caspofungin, and posaconazole. Amphotericin B and posaconazole were found to be active against most of the Mucorales strains tested. Posaconazole and currently available antifungal agents exhibit a potent activity in vitro against the majority of pathogenic fungal species.     

Differential activity of triazoles in two-drug combinations with the echinocandin caspofungin against Aspergillus fumigatus

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the in vitro activity of various triazoles in two-drug combinations with the echinocandin caspofungin against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus.Method: Conidial suspensions were prepared from 20 clinical isolates of A. fumigatus highly susceptible to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole (MIC-0 range 0.125-1 mg/L), and caspofungin (MIC-0 range 32-64 mg/L). The in vitro susceptibility of A. fumigatus to two-drug combinations of itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole with caspofungin was evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) method. RESULTS: Two-drug combinations of caspofungin with itraconazole (FICI = 0.49 +/- 0.04) or posaconazole (FICI = 0.32 +/- 0.09) provided synergic interaction. On the other hand, ravuconazole (FICI = 0.61 +/- 0.31) and voriconazole (FICI = 1.61 +/- 0.42) in combination with caspofungin showed no interaction against A. fumigatus. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the in vitro antifungal efficacies of combinations of members from two different classes are not always similar and hence are not predictable.     

In Vitro Synergy of Caspofungin and Amphotericin B against Aspergillus and Fusarium spp.

We investigated the in vitro interaction of caspofungin and amphotericin B for clinical isolates of Aspergillus and FUSARIUM: Synergy tests were performed using the checkerboard method and following the NCCLS M38-P guidelines in Antibiotic Medium 3 broth supplemented to 2% glucose. Antagonism was not observed for any of the isolates tested. Caspofungin and amphotericin B were synergistic or synergistic to additive for at least half of the isolates.