Transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into adult or pediatric recipients

In Japan, nationwide cadaveric organ sharing for kidney transplantation by the Japan Organ Transplant Network (JOTN) has operated since April 1995. This study retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of single pediatric donor kidneys transplanted into adult or pediatric recipients at a single center. From March 1983 to December 2002, 281 cadaveric renal allografts were transplanted at our center, including, 17 recipients of cadaveric kidneys from donors aged less than 16 years. We divided these 17 recipients into two groups: 10 adult recipients (group 1; G1) and seven pediatric recipients (group 2; G2). HLA-AB, -DR mismatches were 1.3 +/- 1.3, 0.7 +/- 0.5 in G1 and 2.6 +/- 1.3, 1.4 +/- 0.8 in G2, respectively (P < .05 for both). The end of the observation of this study was March 2003. Among G1, two recipients died with functioning grafts and one died after graft loss. Among G2, no recipients died. Patient survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 100% and 100% in G2, respectively. At the end of the observation in this study, five recipients among G1 and six recipients among G2 had functioning grafts. Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 85.7% and 85.7% in G2, respectively. Our results demonstrate that transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into pediatric recipients was excellent compared to adult recipients in terms of survival. Priority to pediatric patients should be given especially in cases of pediatric donors.     

Cadaveric kidney transplantation: five years experience at a single center

BACKGROUND: In the past, the majority of renal transplantations in Iran were from living donors, but recently cadaveric donation of organs is increasing. We reviewed our experience on kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors for the past 5 years in our center. METHODS: Between July 1998 and September 2004, 122 kidneys were removed from 61 cases of brain-dead patients and transplanted in 114 patients with end-stage renal disease in our center. Two kidneys had tumoral involvement and were discarded. Three kidneys were transplanted in other centers and three patients received en bloc kidney transplantations. In addition, we performed nine cases of heart, one case of liver, and one case of lung transplantations. All the recipients were followed for at least 1 year and posttreatment renal function and graft survival were determined. RESULTS: All cadaveric donors were brain dead due to car (30%) and motocycle (70%) accidents, with ages ranging from 5 to 56 years (mean, 24/4 years). The mean warm and total cold ischemia times were 7 minutes and 8.1 hours, respectively. The mean distance between harvesting center and our hospital was 65 km. The 1-year graft survival was 92.3%, with mean serum creatinine of 1.76 +/- 0.79 at 1 year. Of other transplanted organs, the liver and lung recipients died 24 hours and 45 days after operation. Among heart recipients, four are still alive. CONCLUSION: Cadaveric donors in developing countries including Iran can be excellent sources of organ donation.     

Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors

BACKGROUND: Availability of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation is far below the growing need, leading to longer waiting time and more deaths while waiting. METHODS: Using national data from 1995 to 2000, we evaluated graft survival by donor characteristics and the rate of discard of retrieved organs, with the goal of increasing use of kidneys that are associated with increased risk of graft failure, that is, expanded donor kidneys. RESULTS: Cox models identified four donor factors that independently predicted significantly higher relative risk of graft loss compared with a low-risk group. These factors included donor age, cerebrovascular accident as the cause of death, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL), and history of hypertension. Expanded donor kidneys were defined as those with relative risk of graft loss greater than 1.70 and included all donors aged 60 years and older and those aged 50 to 59 years with at least two of the other three conditions (cerebrovascular cause of death, renal insufficiency, hypertension). The expanded donor group accounted for 14.8% of transplanted kidneys. Among organs procured from expanded donors, 38% were discarded versus 9% for all other kidneys. The risk of graft loss of expanded donor kidneys was increased in both older and younger recipients but to a greater extent in those recipients older than 50 years. CONCLUSION: By identifying donor factors associated with graft failure, these analyses may help to expand the number of transplanted kidneys by increasing the utilization of retrieved cadaveric kidneys.     

Outcome of transplantation using kidneys from controlled (Maastricht category 3) non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: Many renal transplant centres are reluctant to use kidneys from non-heart-beating (NHB) donors because of the high incidence of primary non-function and delayed graft function reported in the literature. Here, we report our favourable experience of using kidneys from Maastricht category 3 donors (controlled NHB donors). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to June 2002, 42 renal transplants using kidneys from 25 controlled NHB donors were undertaken at our centre. The rates of primary non-function, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection and long-term graft and patient survival were compared with those of 84 recipients of grafts from heart-beating (HB donors) transplanted contemporaneously. RESULTS: Primary non-function did not occur in recipients of grafts from NHB donors but was seen in two grafts from HB donors. DGF occurred in 21 of 42 (50%) kidneys from NHB donors and 14 of 84 (17%) kidneys from HBD donars (p < 0.001). The acute rejection rates in the two groups were similar (33% for grafts from NHB donors vs. 40% from HB donors). By 1 month after transplantation, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine concentration between the two groups. Over a median follow-up period of 32 months (range 2-75 months), the actuarial graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 yr after transplantation were 84, 80 and 74% for recipients of kidneys from NHB donors, compared with 89, 85 and 80% for kidneys from HB donors. CONCLUSION: Controlled NHB donors are a valuable and under-used source of kidneys for renal transplantation. The outcome for recipients of kidney allografts from category 3 NHB donors is similar to that seen in recipients of grafts from conventional HB cadaveric donors.     

Horseshoe kidney transplantation within the eurotransplant region: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The horseshoe kidney is the most common anatomic renal variation, with an incidence of 1 in 600 to 800. It represents a fusion anomaly, usually of the lower poles. Horseshoe kidneys can be transplanted en bloc or after division of the renal isthmus. However, the great variation in origin, number, and size of renal arteries and veins leads to some reluctance to use horseshoe kidneys for transplantation. The aim of this study is to assess the results of horseshoe kidney transplantation. METHODS: All data concerning horseshoe kidney transplantations within the Eurotransplant region were collected and were divided into en bloc and split transplantations. A matched control group was defined, and the three groups were analyzed with respect to the occurrence of primary nonfunction, graft survival, patient survival, and finally posttransplant serum creatinine values. RESULTS: From 1983 to 2000, 8 horseshoe kidneys were transplanted en bloc and 26 were split and transplanted into 47 recipients. The results of these transplantations were compared with 110 transplantations in the control group. No significant differences among the three groups could be found, either in the short- or long-term posttransplant results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of horseshoe kidney transplantation, either en bloc or split, are equal to the posttransplant results of kidneys with a normal anatomy. Bearing in mind the shortage of donors, horseshoe kidneys should certainly be used for transplantation.     

Doppler ultrasonography before and 6 to 12 months after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound examination of the kidney is relatively inexpensive and provides a way to assess renal location, contour, and size. Doppler ultrasonography is a noninvasive tool for screening renal artery stenosis. It not only provides kidney morphology data, but also describes hemodynamic changes associated with renal artery stenosis, such as increased peak systolic velocity and decreased resistance index (RI). The aim of this study was to compare the Doppler ultrasonographic changes between the donor's kidney before transplantation and the recipient's kidney at 6 to 12 months after transplantation. METHODS: We compared the results of Doppler ultrasonography in 20 kidney donors and recipients before and 6 to 12 months after transplantation. For this purpose the size, cortical thickness, echogenicity, anastomosis, mean pulsatility index (MPI), and RI of the kidney were recorded in potential donors before transplantation and in recipients at 6 to 12 months after transplantation for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was more than a 10-mm increase in transplanted kidney length 6 to 12 months after transplantation in 75% of recipients. There was also more than a 10-mm increase in the width of the transplanted kidney in 80% of recipients. There was no significant change in cortical thickness between the donor and the recipient of the kidney. MPI and RI increased slightly after transplantation. There was more than 50% anastomotic stenosis in only 10% of transplanted kidneys. CONCLUSION: There was significant enlargement of the kidney size with a nonsignificant increase in MPI and RI of the transplanted kidney. Anastomotic stenosis was also less significant in our study.     

Non-heart-beating Donors: Renewed Source of Organs for Renal Transplantation during the Twenty-first Century

Abstract The growing demand of organs for renal transplantation makes it necessary to explore alternative routes for kidney donation. Non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) are a valuable source of cadaveric organs and have been the subject of renewed interest in recent years. In addition to difficulties with legal and ethical acceptability, there are concerns regarding medical safety. The current NHBD program at St. George’s Hospital in London was started in March 1995. A total of 41 kidneys from category I to III donors (according to the Maastricht classification) were retrieved from the Accident and Emergency Department and several intensive care units and were subsequently transplanted. Cold in situ perfusion was commenced via femoral access or rapid aortic cannulation in most donors. Of these transplanted kidneys, 35 started functioning within 4 weeks. The permanent nonfunction (PNF) rate was 14.6% (6/41) and the estimated 1-year graft survival 82.9% (34/41). The delayed graft function (DGF) rate (defined as recipients requiring posttransplant dialysis for 3 days or longer) was 80.0% (28/35). The median serum creatinine concentration in patients with a functioning graft at 1 year was 165 μmol/L. NHBD kidneys have contributed about 15% to the regional transplant activity over the last 6 years, even though not all potential NHBDs were used. It was possible to lower the PNF rate with strict donor selection criteria and more recently with pulsatile machine perfusion. NHBDs represent a valuable source for kidneys and can extend the donor pool. More experience is currently needed to continue to lower PNF rates reliably before promoting more widespread use of NHBDs for renal transplantation.     

Clinical analysis on 48 cases of kidney transplantation from brain and cardiac death donors

Objective To observe the short-term clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from brain and cardiac death donors (DBCD) and assess its feasibility to expand organ donor pool. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 cases of kidney transplantation from DBCD.The transplant recipients had finished 12-month follow-up in the First People's Hospital of Foshan from September 2011 to February 2015, with their renal function, rejection reaction and complications at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after renal transplantation being collected. Survival rates of transplant recipients and transplant kidneys, incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and its influence for recipients and graft survival were analyzed by statistics. Results In the 48 cases, the survival rates of recipients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation were 100.0%, 100.0%, 97.9%, 95.8%, and the survival rates of transplanted kidneys were 95.8%, 95.8%, 93.8%, 91.7%, respectively. DGF occurred in 8 of 48 (17.0%), but the occurrence of DGF did not adversely influence patient's survival (P=0.524) or graft survival (P=0.362). Conclusions The short-term clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from DBCD are ideal. As the legislation of donation after brain death (DBD) has not been ratified in China, the kidney transplantation from DBCD could be an important way to solve the shortage of organs, and increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation.     

Kidney Transplantation From a Donor With Sickle Cell Disease

In the United States, >100 000 patients are waiting for a kidney transplant. Given the paucity of organs available for transplant, expansion of eligibility criteria for deceased donation is of substantial interest. Sickle cell disease (SCD) is viewed as a contraindication to kidney donation, perhaps because SCD substantially alters renal structure and function and thus has the potential to adversely affect multiple physiological processes of the kidney. To our knowledge, transplantation from a donor with SCD has never been described in the literature. In this paper, we report the successful transplantation of two kidneys from a 37‐year‐old woman with SCD who died from an intracranial hemorrhage. Nearly 4 mo after transplant, both recipients are doing well and are off dialysis. The extent to which kidneys from donors with SCD can be safely transplanted with acceptable outcomes is unknown; however, this report should provide support for the careful expansion of kidneys from donors with SCD without evidence of renal dysfunction and with normal tissue architecture on preimplantation biopsies.     

Kidneys from Deceased Donors: Maximizing the Value of a Scarce Resource

Donor age is a significant risk factor for graft loss after kidney transplantation. We investigated the question whether significant graft years were being lost through transplantation of younger donor kidneys into older recipients with potentially shorter lifespans than the organs they receive. We examined patient and graft survival for deceased donor kidney transplants performed in the United States between the years 1990 and 2002 by Kaplan-Meier plots. We categorized the distribution of deceased donor kidneys by donor and recipient age. Subsequently, we calculated the actual and projected graft survival of transplanted kidneys from younger donors with the patient survival of transplant recipients of varying ages. Over the study period, 16.4% (9250) transplants from donors aged 15-50 were transplanted to recipients over the age of 60. At the same time, 73.6% of donors above the age of 50 were allocated to recipients under the age of 60. The graft survival of grafts from younger donors significantly exceeded the patient survival of recipients over the age of 60. The overall projected improvement in graft survival, by excluding transplantation of younger kidneys to older recipients, was approximately 3 years per transplant. Avoiding the allocation of young donor kidneys to elderly recipients, could have significantly increased the overall graft life, by a total 27,500 graft years, between 1990 and 2002, with projected cost savings of about 1.5 billion dollars.     

Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database comparing renal allografts and patient survival in combined liver-kidney transplantation with the contralateral allografts in kidney alone or kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: Combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is the accepted treatment for patients with liver failure and irreversible renal insufficiency. Controversy exists as to whether simultaneous LKT with organs from the same donor confers immunologic and graft survival benefit to the kidney allograft. This study compares the outcomes of simultaneous LKT with the contralateral kidneys used for kidney alone transplantation (KAT) or combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) to understand the factors that account for the differences in survival. METHODS: From October 1987 to October 2001, LKTs with organs from 899 cadaver donors were reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing; 800 contralateral kidneys from these donors were used in 628 KAT and 172 PKT recipients. These 800 paired control patients were the basis of this analysis. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival rates were lower among LKT recipients compared with KAT (P<0.001) and PKT recipients (P<0.001), because of a higher patient mortality rate during the first 3 months posttransplant. Among human leukocyte antigen-mismatched transplants, LKT recipients demonstrated the highest 1-year rejection-free survival rate (LKT 70%, KAT 61%, and PKT 57% ) (P=0.005 vs. KAT, P=0.005 vs. PKT). There was a lower incidence of renal graft loss resulting from chronic rejection among LKT recipients (LKT 2% vs. KAT 8% vs. PKT 6%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LKT exhibit a higher rate of mortality during the first year posttransplant compared with patients undergoing KAT and KPT. Analysis of the data indicates an allograft-enhancing effect of liver transplantation on the renal allograft.     

Inferior Early Posttransplant Outcomes for Recipients of Right Versus Left Deceased Donor Kidneys: An ANZDATA Registry Analysis

Anatomical differences between right and left kidneys could influence transplant outcome. We compared graft function and survival for left and right kidney recipients transplanted from the same deceased organ donor. Adult recipients of 4900 single kidneys procured from 2450 heart beating deceased donors in Australia and New Zealand from 1995 to 2009 were included in a paired analysis. Right kidneys were associated with more delayed graft function (DGF) (25 vs. 21% for left kidneys, p < 0.001) and, if not affected by DGF, a slower fall in serum creatinine. One‐year graft survival was lower for right kidneys (89.1 vs. 91.1% for left kidneys, p = 0.001), primarily attributed to surgical complications (66 versus 35 failures for left kidneys). Beyond the first posttransplant year, kidney side was not associated with eGFR, graft or patient survival. Receipt of a right kidney is a risk factor for inferior outcomes in the first year after transplantation. A higher incidence of surgical complications suggests the shorter right renal vein may be contributory. The higher susceptibility of right kidneys to injury should be considered in organ allocation.     

Long-term results of kidney transplantation from HCV-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Due to the shortage of organs for transplantation, procurement of kidneys from marginal donors is inevitable. Not infrequently, these donors are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). AIM: We sought to determine the effect of transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV-positive donors to anti-HCV-positive recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 765 procedures between 1994 and 2006, 259 kidney recipients were anti-HCV-positive, including 60 who received kidneys from anti-HCV-positive donors (HCV(+)/HCV(+) group) and the others, from seronegative donors (HCV(-)/HCV(+) group). The control group of 506 seronegative recipients received kidneys from seronegative donors (HCV(-)/HCV(-) group). All kidneys from anti-HCV-positive donors were preserved with machine perfusion. We investigated recipient liver function tests (LFTs; alanine aminotrasferase, aspartate aminotransferase; alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin), graft survival, and patient survival. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the groups among the biochemistry results (LFTs, creatinine at 5 years). No significant differences, were observed in patient survival, graft survival, or number of patients returning to dialysis. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors to HCV-positive recipients did not influence long-term liver function, or long-term renal allograft function. This strategy enhances the availability of transplantation as means of end-stage renal disease treatment.     

Outcome in emotionally related living kidney donor transplantation

Background. The growing shortage of cadaver kidneys, the limited possibilities to expand the living related donor pool and the good results obtained in our centre with poorly matched cadaver kidneys, led us in 1991 to begin accepting highly motivated, unrelated, living kidney donors who had a strong emotional bond with the recipients. Methods. Between 1 January 1991 and 1 January 1996, 46 potential living kidney donors and their emotionally related recipients were evaluated. Twenty-three cases were accepted for renal transplantation after thorough somatic and psychological evaluation. The mean post-transplant follow-up until 1 April 1996 was of 28±3 months. Compatible blood groups and a negative cross-match were mandatory, but no minimal HLA matching was required. Results. There was a 50% drop-out rate following the initial screening. The main reasons for not performing transplantation were immunological contraindications in 39% of the cases, somatic in 30.5%, psychological in 26% and socioeconomic in 4.5%. In the accepted group of recipients, 48% (11/23) received transplants without chronic dialysis. Donor survival was 91%; two deaths unrelated to nephrectomy occurred 1 year after donation. The 2-year actuarial recipient and graft survivals were 100% and 91% respectively, compared to 99% (recipients) and 93% (grafts) in the non-HLA-identical living related kidney transplant group, and to 93% (recipients) and 83% (grafts) in the cadaver kidney transplant group. Recipient rehabilitation was completed after 4±1 months. Emotionally related donors returned to work 5±2 weeks after nephrectomy, and no donor regretted his decision, even in the case of failure. Conclusions. Kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option, allowing more patients with end-stage renal disease to avoid chronic dialysis. Recipient and graft outcome were superior to cadaver kidney transplantation. Motivated and emotionally related donors should be allowed to donate one of their kidneys provided that they are carefully selected and thoroughly informed.     

Spousal renal donor transplantation in Chinese subjects: a 10 year experience from a single centre.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric kidneys for renal transplantation is a particularly problematic situation in the locality of Hong Kong. Kidneys from spousal donors are therefore increasingly being used for transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of spousal donor transplant recipients in comparison with that of genetically related living donor (LRD) allograft recipients. METHODS: From 1988, we have transplanted 22 spousal kidney recipients (group 1). All donors must demonstrate a genuine spousal relationship. Their outcome was compared with that of 24 LRD allograft recipients (group 2) transplanted in the same period with similar demographics, pre-transplant dialysis duration, immunosuppressive protocol and length of post-transplant follow-up. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) age was 36.5 +/- 8 and 32.5 +/- 6 years for groups 1 and 2, who were followed for 56.6 +/- 35 and 59.1 +/- 38 months, respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of delayed graft function, acute rejection and serum creatinine level at 5 years. Graft survival rates were 86.4 and 79.2% (P = 0.56), while patient survival rates were 100 and 91.7% (P = 0.171) at 5 years for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Spousal kidney transplantation shares comparable results with LRD transplantation and should be encouraged in places where cadaveric organs remain scarce. Stringent measures must be implemented to prevent the possible emergence of kidney bartering and to protect the interests of living donors. The ethical and social issues regarding the spousal donor in Hong Kong and other countries are discussed.     

Organ allocation in pediatric transplantation in France

In France, ministerial decrees in 1995 and 1996 gave children under 16 who are awaiting transplantation national priority for kidneys and livers from donors under 16, and regional priority for kidneys and livers from donors under 30. We analyzed the effects of these changes on waiting time, death on the waiting list, and balance between demand and supply. The percentage of children who received a transplant during the year of registration increased from 40% in 1993 to 67% in 1998 for kidney transplantation, but only from 50% to 67% for liver transplantation. The number of new children registered on the renal transplant waiting list (84 in 1998) and the number transplanted (85 in 1998) are balanced. But, because of the number of children still on the waiting list at the end of each year, there remains an imbalance of about 70 for kidney transplantation. For liver transplantation, there remains an imbalance of about 35. Death on the renal transplant waiting list has been below 2% since 1993. Death on the liver transplant waiting list decreased from 10–20% in 1993–1995 to 3% in 1998. The number of children who died on the thoracic organ waiting list in 1998 was the same as the number transplanted. In conclusion, the new rules governing organ allocation to children in France have shortened waiting time for renal transplantation, but not for liver transplantation. Many children still die on the waiting list for thoracic organ transplantation. Received: 4 July 2001 / Revised: 4 October 2001 / Accepted: 4 October 2001     

Transplantation of single and paired pediatric kidneys into adult recipients

Background:The transplantation of kidneys from cadaveric donors ≤ 5 years of age into adult recipients is controversial. The large disparity between donor renal mass and recipient body mass is feared to be problematic. Controversy also exists whether to transplant kidneys from these young donors individually or as a pair into a single recipient.Study Design:We retrospectively reviewed our experience from January 1991 to January 1995 with 22 adulrenal transplantations using kidneys from cadaveric donors ≤ 5 years of age. Ten patients received single allografts. Twelve received organs paired en bloc. Fiftytwo adult recipients from cadaveric donors aged 18–55 years served as controls. All patients received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Recipient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups.Results:Actuarial patient and graft survival rates were similar for the two groups. The incidence of urinary complications was higher in the recipients of pediatric kidneys than in the adult-donor group (18.2% versus 3.8%, respectively, p = not significant). No grafts were lost from urinary complications. Renal function, as determined by the calculated creatinine clearance, was significantly greater in the pediatric group (76.1 ± 4.0 versus 61.4 ± 23.2 mL/min, p = 0.035) by 6 months after transplantation. Recipients of paired pediatric kidneys initially had better renal function (63.9 ± 21.4 mL/min) than those receiving single pediatric kidneys (38.2 ± 11.6 mL/min) (p = 0.004), but by 6 months, no significant difference existed. At 2 years, renal function in the pediatric-donor group remained significantly better than in the adult-donor group. Hematocrit levels as a measure of erythropoiesis were similar for single pediatric, paired pediatric, and adult-donor recipients.Conclusions:Kidneys from cadaveric donors ≤ 5 years of age are suitable for transplantation into adults. Pediatric kidneys provide excellent renal function despite an initially tremendous disparity between renal mass and recipient body mass. Rapid true renal growth probably occurs. No appreciable advantage is achieved by using two pediatric kidneys for a single recipient.     

10 Jahre „Eurotransplant Senior Program“

On 1 January 1999 Eurotransplant started the “Eurotransplant Senior Program” (ESP), the first program worldwide for age-matched kidney allocation and transplantation of expanded criteria donors (ECD). By now more than 4.300 kidneys from donors aged ≥65 were transplanted into recipients ≥65, with local or regional allocation according only to blood group compatibility and waiting time. Compared to ongoing dialysis, renal transplantation in the ESP offers longer patient survival and improved quality of life. The article evaluates the results of the ESP and of other studies dealing with renal transplantation of old donor kidneys into aged recipients. Specific aspects like the unexpectedly high acute rejection rate and ways to assess the residual renal function of aged donor kidneys are covered as well as the specific post-transplant risks of aged recipients.     

Transplantation of kidneys with renal artery aneurysm

Olakkengil SA, Mohan Rao M. Transplantation of kidneys with renal artery aneurysm.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E516–E519. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The use of kidneys from a select group of living and deceased donors with renal artery aneurysms (RAA) is a novel way to increase the number of organs available for transplantation. Published literature on the outcome of transplanted kidneys with correctable vascular pathology has been reviewed. Materials and methods: The outcome of six transplant recipients who received kidneys after the repair of RAA is presented. Results: Aneurysm was an incidental finding in two live donors, and two were noticed while preparing the deceased donor grafts for transplantation. Two kidneys were salvaged after nephrectomy as the choice of treatment for the aneurysm. All grafts functioned immediately with no post‐operative complications. Conclusions: While there is scarcity for donor kidneys, these repaired kidneys should not be overlooked. Live donor kidneys with aneurysms can be transplanted successfully after appropriate surgical corrections.     

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation with allografts from DCD donors: A review of UNOS data

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is recognized as an important source of allografts to bridge the growing disequilibrium between the number of donors and recipients. Current transplant experience with DCD organs has focused on the adult recipient population, however little is known about the pediatric recipient experience. While there is increasing acceptance of these grafts in adults, transplant centers appear reluctant to use these grafts in the pediatric population. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 1995-2005 to determine the national experience with pediatric recipients of DCD organs. RESULTS: Among 4026 renal transplants performed in children 18 years and younger, 26 (0.6%) received a renal allograft from a DCD donor. Ten (38.5%) received kidney allografts from pediatric donors (age < or = 18) and 16 (61.5%) from adult donors (age > 18 years). Graft survival at one and five years was 82.5%, 74.3% for kidneys from DCD donors compared to 89.6%, 64.8% from brain dead donors (DBD) (P = 0.7). Among 4991 liver transplants, 19 (0.4%) were from DCD donors. Sixteen patients (84.2%) received livers from pediatric donors and three (15.8%) from adult donors. Graft survival at one and five years was 89.2%, 79.3% for livers from DCD, compared to 75.6%, 65.8% for DBD (P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The use of DCD donors in the pediatric population is very limited; however graft survival is comparable to DBD grafts. Although pediatric centers may have been reluctant to utilize this donor source, this limited experience demonstrates that the select use of DCD organs can produce acceptable and durable graft survival in the pediatric population.