Prevention in practice: results of a 2-year follow-up of routine health promotion interventions in general practice

BACKGROUND.: The effectiveness of health promotion activity in general practiceon risk factor reduction for coronary heart disease remainsthe subject of active debate. OBJECTIVE.: The study aimed to assess the impact of practice-based healthcheck-ups on health behaviours over a 2-year period. METHOD.: A general practice cohort of 7123 patients from 18 practiceswas surveyed. Eight hundred and forty (12%) patients had beenoffered a heafth check within a 12-month period from September1992 and 621 (9%) received one. Two hundred and fifty patients(40%) were asked back for follow-up after their health check. RESULTS.: Over a 2-year period there was no difference in smoking cessation,alcohol consumption, weight loss nor the amount of exercisetaken between those who attended for a health check and thosewho did not. The food score chosen to assess dietary change(Oxcheck) showed a statistically significant 1.16-point risefor the whole sample over the survey period. There was a significantdifference in mean food score change between heafth check attendersand non-attenders (Mann-Whitney U test: P << 0.002). Maintenanceof dietary improvement over a 2-year period was not affectedby health check attendance. CONCLUSIONS.: This study confirms the low impact of health checks on the selfreported modification of cardiovascular risk factors and showsthat maintenance of appropriate health behaviour change is nomore likely in those who have received a health check. Keywords. Health promotion, general practice.     

Time,risk and routine in general practice1

The paper is based on interviews with a sample of 50 general practitioners. It explores their concepts of time’ and ‘task’ in relation to their attempts to create satisfying work roles. There is a contrast between practitioners in urban and rural settings. For urban practitioners the economy of time as a scarce resource generates an element of risk from brief, ‘routine’ diagnosis. For rural practitioners time is not seen as a scarce resource, but they face the risk of working without additional specialist services. For most practitioners the problem is dealt with pragmatically by varying the mix of risky and routine work.     

Privacy in occupational health practice: promoting and impeding factors

AIM: This article describes the views of occupational health professionals, employees, and employers on factors that are thought to promote and impede privacy in occupational health practice. METHODS: The data were collected through theme interviews with 44 subjects and were analysed by content analysis. RESULTS: Both promoting and impeding factors organized around two content areas: "caregiving" (patient-caregiver relationship) and "tripartite cooperation" (cooperation between occupational health professionals, employees, and employer). The content areas illustrated the two different roles Finnish occupational health professionals have toward their two groups of clients: employees and employers. "Adequate behaviour" (respect, good communication, presence) and "Adequate knowledge base" (instinct, work experience, ethical thinking, knowledge of legislation) promoted privacy in caring relationship, whereas "Inadequate behaviour" (untrustworthy, busy, distant, "friend") impeded its realization. In tripartite cooperation, the promoting factors had to do with "Common good" (impartiality, regular contacts, community spirit, fair play) and "Individual good" (informed consent, advocacy). The main category, "Confusions in loyalties", emerged from three subcategories (confusions in confidentiality, confusions in duties, and confusions in roles) illustrating the impeding factors in tripartite cooperation. CONCLUSIONS: Questions of privacy are crystallized in occupational health professionals' diverse duties and roles towards employees and employers. In occupational health practice, privacy cannot be seen only as a privilege of employees, but must also be viewed as an instrumental value serving the interests of employers and whole work community. Confusions in loyalties need more discussion and research before privacy can be optimally realized. Lapses in confidentiality should never happen.     

Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice

The practice of routinely following-up breast cancer in hospitalclinics is of widespread concern: studies have shown that itis not an effective way of detecting recurrent disease and itplaces great strain on cancer services which are already overstretched.A general practice centred system of routine follow-up may bea solution to this problem in those countries which have a strongprimary care base. Such a system would have other benefits suchas continuity of care for the patient. The objective of thisstudy was to determine the views of general practitioners andspecialists on follow-up of patients with breast cancer in remission,with special emphasis on their views on the transfer of routinefollow-up from the hospital to general practice. A postal questionnairesurvey of British breast cancer specialists (response rate 77.0%)and a personal interview survey of British general practitioners(response rate 81.8%) were conducted. The results show thatBritish general practitioners are willing to take on greaterresponsibility for the routine follow-up care of their patientswith breast cancer. However, there was frequently a mis-matchbetween specialists' and general practitioners' views on thissubject.     

Exploring spatial patterns in general practice expenditure

The determinants for per capita general practitioner (GP) public expenditure across Danish municipalities are analysed using data from the period 1997–2004. Heterogeneity and dependency across years are controlled for. Spatial spillover effects across municipalities are investigated in order to disclose the spatial dynamics of public GP expenditure. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity and dependency across time, as well as the presence of a significant spatial spillover effect. The effects of determinants are seriously over-estimated if such features are ignored. The spatial coefficient is strongly significant and suggests that there is an indirect effect on expenditure of non-observable variables that are geographically concentrated.      

Variations in activity and practice patterns: a French study for GPs

OBJECTIVES: To identify the different practice profiles of general practitioners (GPs) in order to test the hypothesis of heterogeneity in physician behaviour. DATA: For the year 2000, 4,660 GPs from two regions in France. Variables: volume and structure of the physicians' medical activity, income level, personal characteristics, socioeconomic and geographical environment, characteristics of their patients. METHODS: A cluster analysis to identify different practice profiles and a regression analysis to display the determinants of the physicians' activity. RESULTS: Four different homogeneous groups can be identified, each one associating a physician's level of activity to his socioeconomic status. The level and the intensity of medical activity depend on individual factors, patients' characteristics as well as the socioeconomic context. CONCLUSIONS: There is no uniformity in the way GPs practice medicine. An immediate consequence is that any cost-containment measure that is applied uniformly to all GPs inevitably results in different outcomes according to the physicians' category type.     

Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe

BACKGROUND: Disease prevention and health promotion are important tasks in the daily practice of all general practitioners (GPs). The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge and attitudes of European GPs in implementing evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention recommendations in primary care, to describe GPs' perceived barriers to implementing these recommendations and to assess how GPs' own health behaviors affect their work with their patients. METHODS: A postal multinational survey was carried out from June to December 2000 in a random sample of GPs listed from national colleges of each country. RESULTS: Eleven European countries participated in the study, giving a total of 2082 GPs. Although GPs believe they should advise preventive and health promotion activities, in practice, they are less likely to do so. About 56.02% of the GPs answered that carrying-out prevention and health promotion activities are difficult. The two most important barriers reported were heavy workload/lack of time and no reimbursement. Associations between personal health behaviour and attitudes to health promotion or activities in prevention were found. GPs who smoked felt less effective in helping patients to reduce tobacco consumption than non-smoking GPs (39.34% versus 48.18%, P < 0.01). GPs who exercised felt that they were more effective in helping patients to practice regular physical exercise than sedentary GPs (59.14% versus 49.70%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant gaps between GP's knowledge and practices persist in the use of evidence-based recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in primary care.     

Dyspepsia in general practice: incidence, risk factors, comorbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND: Many individuals consulting their GP with upper abdominal symptoms are initially classified as having dyspepsia. Few studies have described the incidence of dyspepsia or the comorbidities, risk factors or prognosis associated with this diagnosis. METHODS: We used the UK General Practice Research Database to find patients with a new diagnosis of dyspepsia in 1996 (n = 6,913) and a control cohort (n = 11,036). We determined the incidence of dyspepsia, potential risk factors and comorbidity, and the risk of new onset morbidity in the year following the index date. RESULTS: The incidence of dyspepsia was 15.3 per 1,000 person-years. An increased probability of a dyspepsia diagnosis was associated with chest pain [odds ratio (OR): 2.4], general pain (OR: 1.8), sleep disorders (OR: 1.5), angina (OR: 1.5), osteoarthritis/rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.4) and smoking (OR: 1.2). There was only a borderline association with obesity (OR: 1.1). Patients with dyspepsia had an increased likelihood of a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (OR: 264), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (OR: 62.8) or peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (OR: 27.2) during the following year. CONCLUSIONS: The commonest diagnosis to emerge after an initial consultation for dyspepsia was IBS, followed by GERD and PUD.     

National screening policies in general practice: a case study of routine screening for partner abuse

Internationally-recognised criteria for screening for a particular disorder require the following: availability of a clear diagnosis; a suitable validated screening test; acceptability of routine screening by patients and health providers; benefits of earlier detection and application of appropriate interventions to prevent the progression of a disorder, and hence reduction in incidence of morbidity and mortality; identification of possible harm from screening (false positives, false negatives, adverse effects of labelling, early diagnosis or unnecessary treatment of persons with true-positive test results with inconsequential disease) and weighing this against potential benefits; identification of possible sub-populations with the possibility of targeted screening of high-risk populations; good quality evidence of interventions effective in preventing or managing the disorder; and a cost-effectiveness assay. The New Zealand Ministry of Health have launched a best-practice guideline recommending all female general practice patients sixteen years and over be routinely screened for physical and sexual abuse by their partners. Inter-partner violence, especially against women by male partners and expartners, is a serious public health problem. However, review of existing research indicates that this guideline meets none of the criteria listed above. Considerable funding is invested in training health providers to implement this screening protocol, but, in the absence of effectiveness studies, cost-effectiveness cannot be assessed. Under current conditions, routine screening of adult women for partner abuse cannot be justified. However, GPs should be encouraged to learn about partner abuse and consider this possibility in patients presenting with physical injuries, psychological disturbance or social dysfunction, especially in high-risk patients. Research should be supported for the development and validation of effective, acceptable screening tools and randomised controlled trials of appropriate interventions. The desire to intervene for the public good should not dictate the implementation of a screening programme that disregards accepted screening criteria.     

Prevention in primary care: variability in physician practice patterns in New York City

We conducted a telephone survey of 120 randomly selected primary care physicians in New York City. This survey, which was completed in October 1984, concerned physicians' recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention. The recommendations by these physicians were often at variance with the recommendations of nationally recognized organizations such as the American Cancer Society and the American College of Physicians. Multivariate analysis revealed that board-certified physicians, U.S. medical graduates, and younger physicians agreed more frequently with the recommendations of national organizations. The physicians surveyed agreed upon the need to include health promotion and disease prevention in their practices. Eighty-seven percent agreed with the statement, "Physicians should probably practice more preventive medicine than they presently do." Reasons given for the failure to practice more prevention included lack of time (70 percent), inadequate reimbursement (60 percent), and "unclear recommendations" (58 percent). Approximately four out of five of the physicians felt a task force was needed to "clarify recommendations" for preventive medicine. The findings of this survey suggest a need for increased physician training and education in disease prevention and health promotion.     

Brief intervention for male heavy drinkers in routine general practice: a three-year randomized controlled study

The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of long-term brief intervention in routine general practice. In five primary care out-patient clinics in a Finnish town, 296 male early-phase heavy drinkers consulting a general practitioner (GP) for various reasons were identified. Control group C (n = 88) was informed of the risks of drinking after the screening and were advised at the subsequent feedback about 2 weeks later to reduce their drinking. Groups A (n = 109) and B (n = 99) were offered in addition seven and three brief intervention sessions, respectively. All GPs took part, whether or not they indicated a special interest. The main outcome measures were differences between beginning and end-point at 3 years in self-reported alcohol consumption, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase. There were no statistically significant differences between study groups A, B and C in mean changes in outcome measures. Within all the groups, MCV decreased. Depending on the outcome measure used and the study group analysed, clinically significant reduction of drinking was found in 25-53% of the subjects. In routine general practice, giving additional sessions of brief intervention may not be as effective as in special research conditions. Factors reducing the effectiveness of brief intervention programmes should be investigated, so that primary health care staff can be better supported in their efforts.     

The role of general practice in promoting teenage health: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Teenagers are acknowledged to be at high risk of health-damaging behaviours including smoking, teenage pregnancy, and drug and alcohol use. Additionally, the recognition of high levels of psychological distress is cause for serious concern about teenage health. This paper reviews health promotion interventions for teenagers in general practice. Medline, BIDS, Psyclit and SIGLE databases for January 1990-February 1997 were systematically searched for English language studies on adolescent/teenage health and health promotion interventions in primary health care/general practice; reference sections of articles were checked for earlier work. CONCLUSIONS: The literature indicates that teenagers rarely receive health promotion advice from their physicians. The impact on behaviour change, of screening and health promotion for teenagers in general practice requires further evaluation to asssess the potential effectiveness in preventing the onset or continuation of health-damaging behaviours.