Centromere protein-A, an essential centromere protein, is a prognostic marker for relapse in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Introduction

Centromere protein A (CENP-A), an essential centromere protein, has been associated with high grade cancers. This study was undertaken to determine if CENP-A is a prognostic factor for breast cancer patients not receiving systemic therapy or predictive of response to tamoxifen or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

mRNA levels of CENP-A and CENP-B, a centromere protein that binds independently of CENP-A, were measured in breast cancer specimens from 484 patients receiving no systemic therapy, 276 patients receiving tamoxifen, and 233 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between CENP-A, CENP-B, Ki-67, relapse, and chemotherapy response were determined.

Results

CENP-A but not CENP-B was higher in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors than ER-positive tumors and positively correlated with Ki-67 expression. Among patients with ER-positive disease who received no systemic therapy or tamoxifen, higher levels of CENP-A were associated with lower rates of 5-year distant relapse free survival (DRFS). On multivariate analyses including Ki-67, high CENP-A expression had a hazard ratio of 10.9 for relapse in patients with ER-positive disease not receiving systemic therapy (95% CI, 2.86 to 41.78; P = 0.00047) and 1.64 for patients with ER-positive disease receiving tamoxifen (95% CI, 0.99 to 2.71; P = 0.054). CENP-A was not an independent prognostic marker in ER-negative tumors. For both ER-positive and ER-negative tumors, CENP-A was not a significant independent predictor of chemotherapy response.

Conclusions

CENP-A was a significant independent prognostic marker for patients with ER-positive breast cancer not treated with systemic therapy but had limited predictive value in tamoxifen treated patients and was not predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

乳腺癌药物治疗的现状与展望

术后辅助治疗能够提高乳腺癌病人的总生存率和无病生存率，含蒽环类药方案优于非蒽环类药方案，阿霉素为主方案中加入紫杉醇能进一步提高淋巴结阳性病人的生存率，化疗加用他莫昔芬（TAM）能进一步提高疗效，辅助化疗疗效与一定剂量强度相关，但强烈化疗联合造血干细胞 不能改善病人生存，新辅助化疗对Ⅲ期乳腺癌有效，合理应用内分泌治疗和化疗能改善晚期病人的生活质量，延长高质量的生存期。     

Endocrine sensitivity of estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer is negatively correlated with aspartate‐β‐hydroxylase expression

Although prognostic markers for early estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancer have been extensively developed, predictive markers for adjuvant endocrine therapy are still lacking. Focusing on the mechanisms underlying endocrine resistance, we investigated whether the endocrine sensitivity of ER‐positive breast cancer cells was correlated with the expression of aspartate‐β‐hydroxylase (ASPH), which is involved in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. ASPH expression in ER‐positive and tamoxifen‐resistant breast cancer cells was upregulated by the MAPK and phosphoinositide‐3 kinase (PI3K) pathways, which both play pivotal roles in endocrine resistance. In the clinical setting, ASPH expression was negatively correlated with recurrence‐free survival of luminal B breast cancer patients that received adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not in patients that did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. Luminal B breast cancer is one of the intrinsic molecular subtypes identified by the Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 (PAM50) multiple gene classifier, and because of its poor response to endocrine therapy, chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy is generally required after surgical resection. Our results suggest that the endocrine sensitivity of luminal B breast cancer can be assessed by examining ASPH expression, which promotes the consideration of a prospective study on the association between ASPH expression at the mRNA and protein levels in luminal B breast cancer and subsequent response to endocrine therapy.     

Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in patients with metastaticbreast cancer who have been previously treated with or exposed to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. In this prospective randomized trial, the role of paclitaxel was evaluated in an adjuvant setting to determine its impact on reducing the risk of recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Five hundred twenty-four patients were randomized to be treated either with 4 cycles of paclitaxel followed by 4 cycles of combination therapy with 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (Pac/FAC) or with 8 cycles of FAC alone. Patients with intact primary breast cancer received the initial 4 cycles of paclitaxel or 4 cycles of FAC in a neoadjuvant setting. Planned duration of therapy was the same in all patients. After completion of 8 cycles of chemotherapy, those patients who were > or =50 years and whose tumors were positive for estrogen receptors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients have had a recurrence after a median follow-up of 60 months with a range of 5-89 months. Estimated disease-free survival at 48 months was 0.83 for FAC and 0.86 for Pac/FAC group. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). The overall estimated hazard ratio for Pac/FAC compared with FAC derived by fitting the Cox regression model and incorporating terms for prognostic factors was 0.66. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to a FAC regimen of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy may further reduce the risk of disease recurrence; however, differences were not statistically significant. At the time of this analysis, there have been 47 deaths. The survival data are too preliminary to permit meaningful evaluation of the impact of paclitaxel on mortality.     

Downregulation of SIAH2, an ubiquitin E3 ligase, is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer

Purpose In our microarray analysis we observed that Seven-in-Absentia Homolog 2 (SIAH2) levels were low in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors of patients resistant to first-line tamoxifen therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate SIAH2 for its (a) predictive/prognostic value, and (b) functional role in endocrine therapy resistance. Patients and methods SIAH2 expression was measured with quantitative Real-Time-PCR (qRT-PCR) in 1205 primary breast tumor specimens and related to disease outcome. The functional role of SIAH2 was determined in human breast cancer cell lines ZR-75-1, ZR/HERc, and MCF7. Cell lines were treated with estrogen (E2), anti-estrogen ICI164.384 or epidermal growth factor (EGF). Moreover, MCF7 was treated with ICI164.384 after silencing SIAH2 expression. Results SIAH2 was not prognostic in 603 lymph node negative patients who had not received adjuvant systemic therapy. In multivariate analysis of ER-positive tumors of 235 patients with recurrent disease, SIAH2 as continuous variable, significantly predicted first-line tamoxifen treatment failure (OR = 1.48; P = 0.05) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.79; P = 0.007). Furthermore, in primary breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, SIAH2 predicted metastasis-free survival (MFS) (HR = 0.73; P = 0.005). In vitro experiments showed that SIAH2 silencing in MCF7 cells resulted in resistance to ICI164.384-treatment when compared with mock silenced cells (P = 0.008). Interestingly, in ZR cells transfected with EGFR (ZR/HERc), SIAH2 expression was induced by E2 but downregulated by EGF. Conclusion In primary breast tumor specimens as well as in vitro low SIAH2 levels associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. Moreover, SIAH2 expression showed an opposite regulation by E2 and EGF.     

miR-181a表达水平与ER阳性乳腺癌对内分泌治疗敏感性的关系

目的:研究miR-181a表达水平与雌激素受体（estrogen receptor,ER）阳性乳腺癌对内分泌治疗敏感性之间的关系。方法:采用梯度递增法诱导乳腺癌他莫昔芬耐药细胞株,利用集落形成实验检测细胞对他莫昔芬的敏感性。利用RT-PCR法检测miR-181a表达的情况,利用KM-plotter分析miR-181表达与乳腺癌患者预后之间的关系。结果:我们成功的诱导了MCF-7他莫昔芬继发耐药细胞株TAM-R。RT-PCR分析结果显示:他莫昔芬继发耐药的TAM-R细胞株及原发他莫昔芬耐药BT474细胞株中miR-181a的表达水平均显著高于对他莫昔芬敏感的MCF-7细胞株。生存分析结果显示:miR-181a的表达水平与ER阴性乳腺癌患者的总生存无关,但在ER阳性乳腺癌中miR-181a表达高的患者总生存明显差于miR-181a低表达者。进一步分析结果显示:在ER阳性但未接受内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者中miR-181a表达与总生存无关,但在ER阳性且接受过内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者中miR-181a高表达者总生存显著差于miR-181a低表达者。结论:miR-181a高表达ER阳性乳腺癌患者对内分泌治疗敏感性差,miR-181a可能是预测ER 阳性乳腺癌对内分泌治疗敏感性的指标。     

Loss of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein makes human breast cancer cells more sensitive to antimetabolite exposure.

PURPOSE: The RB tumor-suppressor activity may influence the therapeutic response in human breast cancers. The effect of adjuvant therapy on clinical outcome of breast cancer patients was analyzed, and the sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate was investigated in MCF-7 and HCT-116 human cancer cells, according to their RB status. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RB protein (pRB) expression was prospectively evaluated by immunocytochemistry in 518 consecutive patients and its predictive value was determined according to the adjuvant therapeutic treatments. MCF-7 and HCT-116 human cancer cells silenced for RB1 expression were treated with 5-FU and methotrexate, at the same concentrations and time exposures as determined in the interstitium of breast cancers of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of disease-free survival, including all the established clinical and histopathologic prognostic variables, indicated that the absence of pRB expression was the only predictive factor of good clinical outcome in patients treated with standard systemic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU) but not in patients treated with endocrine therapy alone. 5-FU and methotrexate significantly reduced the growth rate of RB1-silenced but not of control MCF-7 and HCT-116 cells. This was likely due to the absence of a DNA damage checkpoint with accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks in RB1-silenced but not in control cells. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of pRB expression renders human breast cancer cells more sensitive to 5-FU and methotrexate and predicts a good clinical outcome for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We suggest that patients with RB-negative breast cancers should be treated with systemic chemotherapy.     

What is the role of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive,advanced breast cancer?

Most breast tumors depend on female sex hormones for development and growth, thus being amenable to endocrine therapies. In the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, advanced breast cancer, conventional wisdom dictates the use of endocrine therapy for patients with good prognostic features, whereas chemotherapy is recommended for the treatment of visceral crisis. There is, however, considerable uncertainty regarding the best initial strategy for patients with poor prognostic features other than visceral crisis, such as small-volume visceral involvement and a short disease-free interval after adjuvant therapy. In this article, we examine the role of chemotherapy in ER-positive, advanced breast cancer. Our review of the literature suggests that, in the absence of visceral crisis, endocrine agents should always be considered a major option for the initial treatment of ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer due to their proven efficacy and favorable toxicity profile. Although certain chemotherapy agents can induce higher response rates and more rapid responses, which are desirable effects in particular situations, the up-front use of chemotherapy does not seem to influence the overall outcome of the disease. In the subset of patients with epidermal growth factor type 2-positive disease, on the other hand, current data still do not support the use of endocrine agents alone.     

Long-term follow-up of the randomized Stockholm trial on adjuvant tamoxifen among postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer

The Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group conducted a randomized trial during 1976 through 1990 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen versus control. A total of 2,738 postmenopausal women with invasive, early stage disease were randomised between tamoxifen for 2 or 5 years, or no adjuvant endocrine therapy. Among high-risk patients the treatment was given against a background of either postoperative, locoregional radiation or CMF-type chemotherapy. The median follow up was 18 years (range 11-25 years). There was a statistically significant (p =0.001) interaction between ER status and tamoxifen with no treatment benefit among receptor negatives. PgR-status had little additional predictive value. Among ER-positive patients tamoxifen reduced locoregional recurrences by 48%, contralateral breast cancers by 54%, distant metastases by 28%, and all events by 24% (p <0.001). On the other hand, there was a substantial increase of endometrial cancer associated with tamoxifen. There was no effect of tamoxifen on intercurrent mortality whereas breast cancer deaths were reduced by 31% (p <0.001) and overall mortality by 15% (p =0.01). Tamoxifen produced long-term benefits among estrogen receptor positive patients in terms of breast cancer-related events, but also an increased incidence of endometrial cancer. Despite long-term follow-up we observed no benefit with tamoxifen in terms of cardiovascular mortality.     

Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories. RESULTS: In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P <.0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P <.0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.     

Low levels of estrogen receptor beta protein predict resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is a hormone-dependent cancer, and the presence of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) in tumors is used clinically to predict the likelihood of response to hormonal therapies. The clinical value of the second recently identified ER isoform, called ER-beta, is less clear, and there is currently conflicting data concerning its potential role as a prognostic or predictive factor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To assess whether ER-beta expression is associated with clinical outcome, protein levels were measured by immunoblot analysis of a retrospective bank of tumor cell lysates from 305 axillary node-positive patients. A total of 119 received no adjuvant therapy, and 186 were treated with tamoxifen only. The median follow-up time was 65 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling was done to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of ER-beta expression. RESULTS: Expression of ER-beta protein did not correlate significantly with any other clinical variables, including ER and progesterone levels (as measured ligand binding assay), tumor size, age, or axillary nodal status. In the untreated population, those patients whose tumors who expressed both receptor isoforms exhibited the most favorable outcome as compared with those patients who had lost ER-alpha expression. However, there was no association between ER-beta levels alone and either disease-free or overall survival in the untreated patient population. In contrast, in both univariate and multivariate analyses, high levels of ER-beta predicted an improved disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that ER-beta may be an independent predictor of response to tamoxifen in breast cancer. Furthermore, these results suggest that ER-beta may influence tumor progression in ways different from those mediated by the ER-alpha isoform.     

Role of adjuvant endocrine therapy in early-stage breast cancer

The value of adjuvant endocrine therapy in saving lives of women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) early-stage breast cancer cannot be disputed. Tamoxifen has proven to be effective in improving relapse-free and overall survival in both pre- and postmenopausal women with ER(+) early-stage breast cancer. In the meta-analysis of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, the proportional reduction in recurrence and mortality for 5 years of tamoxifen therapy was 50% and 28% respectively for patients with ER(+) tumors. These reductions in recurrence and mortality were similar in both lymph node-negative (N(-)) and lymph node-positive (N(+)) patients and translate to an absolute improvement in 10-year survival of approximately 11% in N(+) patients and 6% in N(-) patients. Current data suggest that about 5 years of tamoxifen therapy is the optimal duration of treatment. For women with ER(-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR(-)) tumors, tamoxifen does not lower the risk of distant metastases or improve survival. In ER(+) patients, the addition of tamoxifen to chemotherapy further lowers the risk of recurrence by about 30% to 40% when compared to chemotherapy alone. In premenopausal women with ER(+) breast cancer, ovarian ablation has proven to be as effective as chemotherapy in improving both relapse-free and overall survival and the potential additive role of ovarian ablation to chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen is presently being explored in clinical trials. The combination of tamoxifen and ovarian ablation is currently being tested and may be superior to tamoxifen alone. In addition, newer, more effective, and less toxic aromatase inhibitors are also being evaluated in clinical trials in the adjuvant setting and have great promise. "Pure" antiestrogens or selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) will be studied in adjuvant clinical trials in the near future. Recent data also suggest that molecular markers such as HER-2/neu may predict the response to endocrine therapy, and other predictive factors are currently being evaluated. Lastly, there is renewed interest in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, a treatment option that may select those patients with early-stage breast cancer most likely to benefit from endocrine therapy.     

369例ER阳性乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗的前瞻性临床研究

目的 评价ER阳性乳癌根治术后辅助内分泌治疗的效果。方法 ER阳性的根治性术后乳腺癌患者分为内分泌治疗及化疗两组,进行全身辅助治疗。内分泌治疗组194例,服用三苯氧胺（TAM）5年,其中绝经前患者均先切除双侧卵巢后再服用TAM。化疗组175例,主要采用CMFVP或CMF方案。结果 绝经后患者的内分泌治疗组和化疗组5年无病生存率分别为78．4％和45．4％（P＜0．01）,5年总生存率分别为83．3％和52．9％（P＜0．05）;绝经前患者的内分泌治疗组和化疗组5年无病生存率分别为72．8％和35．7％（P＜0．01）。5年总生存率分别为80．7％和60．0％（P＜0．05）。但是Ⅰ期患者及腋淋巴结转移≥8个的患者,两者疗效差异无显著性（P＞0．05）。结论 ER阳性乳腺癌术后辅助内分泌治疗效果优于或等于化疗。     

C–X–C ligand 10 and C–X–C receptor 3 status can predict tamoxifen treatment response in breast cancer patients

To investigate the expression levels of CXCL10 and CXCR3 in tumors from breast cancer patients randomized to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment or no endocrine treatment, in order to further study the connection to prognosis and prediction of tamoxifen treatment outcome. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays from 912 breast cancer patients randomized to tamoxifen or no endocrine treatment. CXCR3 status was found to be a prognostic tool in predicting distant recurrence, as well as reduced breast cancer-specific survival. In patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, tumors with strong CXCL10 levels had improved effect of tamoxifen treatment in terms of local recurrence-free survival [risk ratio (RR) 0.46 (95 % CI 0.25–0.85, P = 0.01)] compared with patients with tumors expressing weak CXCL10 expression. Further, patients with ER-positive tumors with strong CXCR3 expression had an improved effect of tamoxifen in terms of breast cancer-specific survival [RR 0.34 (95 % CI 0.19–0.62, P < 0.001)] compared with the group with weak CXCR3 levels [RR 1.33 (95 % CI 0.38–4.79, P = 0.65)]. We show here for the first time that CXCL10 and CXCR3 expression are both predictors of favorable outcome in patients treated with tamoxifen.     

Current status of endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is usually indicated prior to chemotherapy as the first line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients because of its milder toxicity. Patients who respond to a first-line endocrine therapy have a high chance of responding to a second-line endocrine therapy, and thus the responders to a first-line endocrine therapy would better be treated with second or third-line endocrine therapy. In the adjuvant setting, tamoxifen (antiestrogen) has been proven to improve the prognosis of both pre- and postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients, and goserelin (LH-RH agonist) has been proven to improve prognosis in premenopausal women comparable to chemotherapy (CMF). Very recently, preliminary results have indicated that anastrozole (aromatase inhibitor) is superior to tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for estrogen receptor positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients. In addition, the recent success of tamoxifen in a chemoprevention trial seems to have ushered in a new era wherein prevention of breast cancer is much more emphasized than treatment of established breast cancer.     

A phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma: final analysis with 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to assess whether sequential potentially noncross-resistant chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast carcinoma. METHODS: Seven hundred eighty-nine patients were registered and followed for a median of 10 years. They were treated in two groups. In Group 1, patients age < 50 years or age > 50 years but with either negative or unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status were randomized to receive 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) alone or followed by 4 cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine (MV). In Group 2, patients age > or = 50 years with ER-positive disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or combination chemotherapy (FAC + MV) for 10 cycles. Analysis was performed according to allocated treatment (intention to treat), with all randomized patients included. RESULTS: In Group 1 there were no significant differences with regard to DFS or OS between the two treatment arms. The DFS at 5 years was 0.70 and 0.76, respectively, for FAC compared with FAC+MV (P = 0.26). The OS was similar for both groups (0.84 vs. 0.83). It is interesting to note that there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for improved DFS in the FAC + MV arm for patients who were ER-positive. In Group 2, tamoxifen alone led to more prolonged DFS compared to FAC+MV (0.78 vs. 0.66, respectively) but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.28). OS also was associated with a trend (P = 0.86) toward prolonged survival for the tamoxifen arm compared with the FAC+MV arm (0.85 vs. 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current trial concerning sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma, which to our knowledge contains the longest follow-up presented to date, failed to demonstrate any additional benefit from the addition of 4 cycles of MV to 6 cycles of FAC chemotherapy.     

A randomized trial of endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and chemo-endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer

A randomized trial of endocrine therapy (adreno-oophorectomy, H), chemotherapy (FAC, C), chemoendocrine therapy (FAC + tamoxifen, H'C, or FAC + adreno-oophorectomy, HC) was performed in 114 advanced breast cancer patients from September, 1979 to December, 1983, and 106 were evaluable. The response to H, C, H'C, and HC was shown to be 33% (10/30), 54% (14/26), 59% (17/29), and 76% (16/21), respectively. There was a significantly higher response rate in HC group than H group. Higher but not significantly different response was obtained by H'C as compared with H. There were no significant differences in the overall survival among the treatment arms. However, patients treated with H survived longer (greater than 5 years). These results suggest that higher response obtained by chemotherapy, alone or in combination with endocrine therapy does not seem to contribute to the prolongation of survival of the patients.