The International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I-IV: 15 years follow-up

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant systemic therapy prolongs disease-free and overallsurvival in both pre- and postmenopausal patients. Availabledata shown benefit from multi-agent chemotherapy, prolongedtamoxifen treatment, and ovarian ablation, and that the combinationof chemo- and endocrine therapy might be advantageous. In 1978the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)initiated four complementary randomized controlled clinicaltrials to evaluate the roles of chemo-endocrine combinationsor endocrine therapy alone in specific populations defined byrisk (for pre- and perimenopausal patients) or by age (for postmenopausalpatients). The results at 10 and 13 years' median follow-upfor these trials are summarized in this report and are comparedto those of the Overview meta-anal-ysis with regard to chemo-endocrineor endocrine therapy combinations. Furthermore, types of firstrelapses by sites and second malignant diseases are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1601 evaluable patients with node positive disease were includedinto the studies I–IV. In Trial I (491 premenopausal patientswith 1–3 positive axillary nodes) we studied the additionof low-dose continuous prednisone (p) to a cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil(CMF) combination. In Trial n 327 premenopausal patients withfour or more positive axillary nodes were randomized to oneyear CMFp or to a surgical oophorectomy followed by CMFp. InTrial III (463 postmenopausal patients 65 years old or younger),combined chemoendocrine therapy (one year of CMFp plus tamoxifen(T)) was compared to endocrine therapy (1 year of p + T) orto surgery alone. In Trial IV 320 postmenopausal patients 66to 80 years old were treated either by surgery alone or by surgeryfollowed by 1 year prednisone and tamoxifen. RESULTS: In Trial I the addition of prednisone allowed a higher doseof cytotoxics to be administered compared with CMF alone. Despitethis increased dose intensity, 13-year disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for the two treatmentgroups (49% vs. 52% DFS, 59% vs. 65% OS for CMFp vs. CMF). InTrial II the addition of surgical oophorectomy to CMFp yieldedan improved outcome which approached statistical significancefor the subset of 107 patients known to have estrogen receptor-positivetumors (DFS, 23% vs. 15%, p     

The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND:: The addition of low-dose prednisone (p) to the adjuvant regimenof cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) allowedpatients to receive a larger dose of cytotoxics when comparedwith those on CMF alone. However, disease-free survival andoverall survival were similar for the two groups. To test thehypothesis that low-dose prednisone might influence the efficacyof the cytotoxic regimen used, the toxicity profiles of thetwo treatment regimens and the patterns of treatment failure(relapse, second malignancy, or death) were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: 491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with one to threepositive axillary lymph nodes included in International (Ludwig)Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial I from 1978 to 1981and randomized to receive CMFp or CMFp were analyzed for differencesin long-term outcome and toxic events. The 250 patients assignedto CMF and prednisone received on the average 12% more cytotoxicdrugs than those who received CMF alone. RESULTS:: The 13-year DFS for the CMFp group was 49% as compared to 52%for CMF alone, and the respective OS percents were 59% and 65%.Several toxic effects such as leukopenia, alopecia, mucositisand induced amenorrhea were reported at a similar incidencein the two treatment groups. Using cumulative incidence methodologyfor competing risks, we detected a statistically significantincrease in first relapse in the skeleton for the CMFp groupat 13 years follow-up with a relative risk (RR) of 2.06 [confidenceinterval (CI), 1.23 to 3.46; P = 0.004]. Patients with largertumors in the CMFp regimen were especially subject to this increasewith a RR for failure in the skeleton of 3.32 (95% CI, 1.57to 7.02; P = 0.0005). CMFp-treated patients also had a largerproportion of second malignancies (not breast cancer), withRR of 3.34(95% CI, 0.91 to 12.31; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS:: Low-dose continuous prednisone added to adjuvant CMF chemotherapyenabled the use of higher doses of cytotoxics. This increaseddose had no beneficial effect on treatment outcome, but wasassociated with an increased risk for bone relapses and a small,not statistically significant increased incidence of secondmalignancies. The effects of steroids, which are widely usedas antiemetics (oral or pulse injection) together with cytotoxics,should be investigated to identify their influence upon treatmentoutcome. adjuvant therapy, breast cancer, CMF, patterns of relapse, prednisone, secondary neoplasm     

Adjuvant hormone treatment and chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Two hundred consecutive postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer and metastatic axillary nodes were treated during the period January - December 1981 with adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF) or hormonal treatment (tamoxifen). The distribution of receptor status (estrogen or progesterone), number of axillary metastatic nodes (less than = 3 or greater than 3), surgical treatment and size of the primary tumor were homogeneous in both groups. Receptor status and number of axillary lymph nodes were correlated with adjuvant treatment efficacy. Ten-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in the TAM-treated (72%) than in the CMF-treated group (52%) (p less than 0.01). In patients with less than = 3 axillary metastatic nodes, those treated with TAM had a higher DFS rate than those treated with CMF (75% vs 59%, p less than 0.01). There was no difference in DFS between CMF-and TAM-treated groups within the greater than 3 metastatic lymph node patients. In ER + primary tumors, DFS was higher in the subset treated with TAM (62%) than with CMF (51%) (p less than 0.05), whereas no difference in DFS was observed in ER- patients between the two treatment groups. Considering the TAM group, DFS was better (p less than 0.01) for ER+ cases than for ER- cases only at 5 years of observation. In the CMF group, DFS was not influenced by ER status. PgR content did not affect DFS in either adjuvant treatment group.     

Adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in the elderly: competing causes of mortality. International Breast Cancer Study Group

Between 1978 and 1981 we conducted a trial in which adjuvant endocrine therapy consisting of tamoxifen (T = 20 mg/d) and low-dose prednisone (p = 7.5 mg/d) for the duration of one year (p + T), was compared with no adjuvant therapy (observation) in 320 women with operable breast cancer aged 66 to 80 years (median age, 70 years). All patients had axillary lymph node metastases after at least a total mastectomy and axillary clearance. At 96 months median follow-up, 9.1% of the patients died without apparent relapse from cancer. An additional 1.9% had a second malignant neoplastic disease (not breast cancer). The 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) percentages (+/- SE) for the p + T and the observation groups were 36% (+/- 4%), and 22% (+/- 3%), (P = .004). The 8-year overall survival percentages were 49% (+/- 4%) and 42% (+/- 4%), respectively (P = .43). We conclude that despite a large proportion of deaths without relapse of breast cancer, a significant advantage for the p + T group in terms of DFS was demonstrated. We hypothesize that an endocrine therapy of longer duration might have an overall survival benefit in a population of elderly patients.     

Long-term results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII: adjuvant chemotherapy plus goserelin compared with either therapy alone for premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer

BackgroundThe International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII compared long-term efficacy of endocrine therapy (goserelin), chemotherapy [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF)], and chemoendocrine therapy (CMF followed by goserelin) for pre/perimenopausal women with lymph-node-negative breast cancer.Patients and methodsFrom 1990 to 1999, 1063 patients were randomized to receive (i) goserelin for 24 months (n = 346), (ii) six courses of ‘classical’ CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy (n = 360), or (iii) six courses of CMF plus 18 months goserelin (CMF→ goserelin; n = 357). Tumors were classified as estrogen receptor (ER) negative (19%), ER positive (80%), or ER unknown (1%); 19% of patients were younger than 40. Median follow-up was 12.1 years.ResultsFor the ER-positive cohort, sequential therapy provided a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) (12-year DFS = 77%) compared with CMF alone (69%) and goserelin alone (68%) (P = 0.04 for each comparison), due largely to the effect in younger patients. Patients with ER-negative tumors whose treatment included CMF had similar DFS (12-year DFS CMF = 67%; 12-year DFS CMF→ goserelin = 69%) compared with goserelin alone (12-year DFS = 61%, P= NS).ConclusionsFor pre/perimenopausal women with lymph-node-negative ER-positive breast cancer, CMF followed by goserelin improved DFS in comparison with either modality alone. The improvement was the most pronounced in those aged below 40, suggesting an endocrine effect of prolonged CMF-induced amenorrhea.     

Relapse of breast cancer after adjuvant treatment in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: patterns and prognoses

Eight hundred eighteen premenopausal or perimenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node metastases were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF) with or without endocrine treatment (prednisone, oophorectomy) in two concurrent prospective trials. Three hundred fifty-two (43%) had recurrent disease at a median follow-up time of 6 years. The 2-year survival percentages from time of first relapse were 16% for patients with initial metastases in visceral or multiple sites (including bone and soft tissue), 41% for those with regional metastases or skeletal relapse alone and 70% for patients with isolated local recurrence or contralateral breast cancer. The features that most influenced prognosis within the categories defined by site of first relapse were disease-free interval (less than 24 months v greater than or equal to 24 months), and estrogen receptor content in the primary tumor. These features had clinical importance (identifying patients with at least a 50% 2-year survival percentage) only in those patients with local, contralateral breast, regional, or bony disease alone. The treatment of individual patients after relapse must be directed toward optimized palliation. The results of this study are important for defining groups of patients who relapse after CMF for whom the subsequent therapeutic approach might be differentiated (eg, experimental treatments for dire prognosis, accent on minimal side effect treatment for intermediate prognosis, and investigation of adjuvant systemic therapy for isolated local recurrence).     

369例ER阳性乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗的前瞻性临床研究

目的 评价ER阳性乳癌根治术后辅助内分泌治疗的效果。方法 ER阳性的根治性术后乳腺癌患者分为内分泌治疗及化疗两组,进行全身辅助治疗。内分泌治疗组194例,服用三苯氧胺（TAM）5年,其中绝经前患者均先切除双侧卵巢后再服用TAM。化疗组175例,主要采用CMFVP或CMF方案。结果 绝经后患者的内分泌治疗组和化疗组5年无病生存率分别为78．4％和45．4％（P＜0．01）,5年总生存率分别为83．3％和52．9％（P＜0．05）;绝经前患者的内分泌治疗组和化疗组5年无病生存率分别为72．8％和35．7％（P＜0．01）。5年总生存率分别为80．7％和60．0％（P＜0．05）。但是Ⅰ期患者及腋淋巴结转移≥8个的患者,两者疗效差异无显著性（P＞0．05）。结论 ER阳性乳腺癌术后辅助内分泌治疗效果优于或等于化疗。     

118例小肿块多腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者的临床特征和预后分析

目的分析小肿块多腋窝淋巴结转移(肿块直径≤2 cm、腋窝淋巴结转移≥4个)乳腺癌患者的临床特征和预后。方法1993年1月至2003年12月我院共收治小肿块多腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者118例,对其临床病理特征、辅助治疗进行分析,以发现相关的预后因素。结果全组患者的5年总生存率为75.0%。腋窝淋巴结转移4～9个及≥10个者的5年生存率分别为89.5%和59.8%(P=0.009),术后化疗患者与未化疗患者的5年生存率分别为82.1%和53.3%(P=0.001),术后内分泌治疗者与未行内分泌治疗者的5年生存率分别为89.2%和61.9%(P=0.001)。单因素Kaplan-Merier生存分析显示,肿瘤分期、术后化疗和内分泌治疗是影响患者预后的重要因素。Cox多因素预后分析显示,肿瘤分期、术后化疗和内分泌治疗是影响患者预后的独立因素。结论小肿块多腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者具有易于转移的趋势,患者预后较差,尤其是腋窝淋巴结转移≥10个的患者;肿瘤分期、辅助化疗和内分泌治疗是影响患者预后的独立因素;合理的综合治疗有可能改善小肿块多腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者的预后。     

Identifying good prognosis group of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes for adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prognosis factors for survival in breast cancer patients with 1-3 axillary lymph node metastases and tried to identify a subset of patients with good prognosis suitable for cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A cohort of 446 breast cancer patients received definite surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 1990 to 1998. They were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time was 69 months. Prognostic factors including age, tumor size, number of involved nodes, steroid receptor status, tumor ploidy, synthetic-phase fraction, histologic grade and administration of tamoxifen were analysed for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox regression model. RESULTS: The estimated 5 year OS and DFS for all patients were 85.4 and 71.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size, age and estrogen receptor (ER) status were independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor size, age, ER status and number of involved nodes were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5 year OS rates of the low-risk group (age >40, tumor < or =3 cm and positive ER) and average-risk group (either age < or =40, tumor >3 cm or negative ER) were 98.8 and 82.4%, respectively (P = 0.0001). The 5 year DFS of the low-risk and high-risk group were 88.2 and 67.7%, respectively (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Among breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes excellent survival rate was found in those who had favorable prognostic factors, including age >40, tumor size < or =3 cm and positive ER. Adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF regimen is optimal for these low-risk patients.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy compared with no systemic therapy for elderly women with early breast cancer: 21-year results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial IV.

PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of older women are affected by early breast cancer, because of prolonged life expectancy and the increasing incidence of breast cancer with age. The role of adjuvant therapy for this population is still a matter of debate. We reviewed the long-term outcome of a mature trial comparing endocrine treatment versus no adjuvant therapy in older women with node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1978 to 1981, 349 women 66 to 80 years of age with pathologically involved lymph nodes after total mastectomy and axillary clearance were randomly assigned to receive 12 months of adjuvant tamoxifen plus low-dose prednisone (p+T) or no adjuvant therapy. Three hundred twenty patients were eligible. RESULTS: At 21 years' median follow-up, 1 year of p+T significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; P =.003) and overall survival (P =.05; 15-year DFS, 10% +/- 3% v 19% +/- 3%; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86). When comparing competing causes of failure (breast cancer recurrence and deaths before breast cancer recurrence), p+T was far superior in controlling breast cancer recurrence (P =.0003), but the improvement was seen mainly in soft tissue sites. Conversely, patients in the p+T group were more likely to die before a breast cancer recurrence (P =.03). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates that significant treatment benefits continue to be observed in older patients treated for 1 year with p+T. Despite issues relating to competing causes of failure, older breast cancer patients can benefit from treatment and should be considered for trials of adjuvant systemic therapy.     

Size of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes: clinical relevance of minimal lymph node involvement.

BACKGROUND: Overt ipsilateral axillary lymph node metastases of breast cancer are the most significant prognostic indicators for women who have undergone surgery, yet the clinical relevance of minimal involvement (isolated tumor cells and micrometastases) of these nodes is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated biologic features, adjuvant treatment recommendations, and prognosis for 1,959 consecutive patients with pT1-3, pN0, minimal lymph node involvement (pN1mi or pN0i+), or pN1a (single positive node) and M0, who were operated on and counseled for medical therapy from April 1997 to December 2000. RESULTS: Patients with pN1a and pN1mi/pN0i+, when compared with patients with pN0 disease, were more often prescribed anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (39.1% v 33.2% v 6.1%, respectively; P < .0001) and were less likely to receive endocrine therapy alone (9.8% v 19.4% v 41.9%, respectively; P < .0001). At the multivariate analysis, a statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) and in the risk of distant metastases was observed for patients with pN1a versus pN0 disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.46 to 2.86; P < .0001 for DFS; HR = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.80; P = .0007 for distant metastases) and for patients with pN1mi/pN0i+ versus pN0 disease (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.47; P = .047 for DFS; HR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.64; P = .037 for distant metastases). CONCLUSION: Even minimal involvement of a single axillary node in breast cancer significantly correlates with worse prognosis compared with no axillary node involvement. Further studies are required before widespread modification of clinical practice.     

3-year results of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. In this pilot study, we explored the efficacy/feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1996 till March 1998, four consecutive groups of patients with stages II and III breast cancer, aged < or = 70 years, received one of the following regimens: a) sequential Doxorubicin (A) --> Docetaxel (T) --> CMF (Cyclophosphamide+Methotrexate+5-Fluorouracil): A 75 mg/m q 3 wks x 3, followed by T100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 3, followed by i.v. CMF Days 1+8 q 4 wks x 3; b) sequential accelerated A --> T --> CMF: A and T administered at the same doses q 2 wks with Lenograstin support; c) combination therapy: A 50 mg/m2 + T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4, followed by CMF x 4; d) sequential T --> A --> CMF: T and A, administered as in group a), with the reverse sequence. When indicated, radiotherapy was administered during or after CMF, and Tamoxifen after CMF. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were treated. The median age was 48 years (29-66) and the median number of positive axillary nodes was 6 (1-25). Tumors were operable in 94% and locally advanced in 6% of cases. Pathological tumor size was >2 cm in 72% of cases. There were 21 relapses, (18 systemic, 3 locoregional) and 11 patients (12%) have died from disease progression. At median follow-up of 39 months (6-57), overall survival (OS) was 87% (95% CI, 79-94%) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% (95% CI, 67%-85%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these docetaxel-based regimens, in terms of OS and DFS, appears to be at least as good as standard anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), in similar high-risk patient populations.     

Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF.

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the leucocyte nadir and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Three hundred and sixty-eight patients with node-positive breast cancer without distant metastases were treated with six cycles of adjuvant CMF. Some patients (n = 60) also received tamoxifen. All patients underwent surgery and received radiotherapy to the axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes and the chest wall. The effect of leucopenia caused by CMF on distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. A low leucocyte nadir during the chemotherapy was associated with a long DDFS in univariate analysis when tested as a continuous variable (the relative risk (RR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.06, P = 0.02). Similarly, when the leucocyte nadir count was divided into tertiles, the patients who had the highest nadir values during the six-cycle treatment had worst outcome (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.07-2.5, P = 0.02). However, in a multivariate analysis only the number of affected lymph nodes, tumour size, progesterone receptor status, surgical procedure, age and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy retained prognostic significance, whereas the leucocyte nadir count did not. A low leucocyte nadir during the adjuvant CMF chemotherapy is associated with favourable DDFS and it may be a useful biological marker for chemotherapy efficacy.     

Identification of a subgroup of patients with breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy

Risk factors for isolated local-regional (LR) recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed in a review of 627 women entered into Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant chemotherapy trials between 1978 and 1982. Premenopausal patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, and prednisone (CMFP), or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, prednisone, and tamoxifen (CMFPT). Postmenopausal patients were randomized to observation, CMFP, or CMFPT. Median follow-up time was 4.5 years. At 3 years, 225 patients relapsed and in 70 (31% of failures, 11% of all patients) the initial site was LR without distant metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of an isolated LR recurrence significantly correlated with the number of positive axillary nodes, the primary tumor size, the presence of tumor necrosis, and the number of axillary nodes examined. Factors that significantly discriminated between an isolated LR recurrence and distant metastasis were the number of positive nodes and primary tumor size. Patients with four to seven positive nodes or tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm had a chance of developing an isolated LR recurrence almost equal to the risk of distant metastases. These findings suggest a potential for improved survival in this subset of patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation to chemotherapy, and continue to emphasize the presence of a group of patients at high risk for isolated LR recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy.     

早期乳腺癌患者根治术后的放射治疗

目的 探讨早期乳腺癌患者根治术后放射治疗的作用。方法 回顾分析605例T1－2N0－1M0乳腺癌患者接受乳腺癌根治性手术后的治疗情况,149例患者单纯手术,135例术后放疗,113例术后化疗或三苯氧胺治疗,208例术后化疗或三苯氧胺治疗加放疗。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier方法和Log rank检验。结果 单纯手术组与手术＋放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为18．7％和7．5％（P＝0．017）,总生存率分别为82．1％和81．1％（P＝0．618）,无瘤生存率分别为65．2％和71．6％（P＝0．457）。术后放射治疗能显著降低局部区域复发率,但对总生存率和无瘤生存率无明显影响。单纯术后全身治疗组和术后全身治疗＋放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为21．1％和9．5％（P＝0．001）,总生存率为75．5％和85．0％（P＝0．020）,无瘤生存率为59．3％和70．2％（P＝0．003）。术后放射治疗＋化疗不仅可显著降低局部区域复发率,还可提高无瘤生存率和总生存率。对窝淋巴结数≥4个接受全身治疗的患者,放射治疗有明显的疗效,能显著降低局部区域复发率,提高无瘤生存率和总生存率,这组患者未放射治疗组和放射治疗组的10年局部区域复发率分别为40．1％和15．1％（P＝0．001）,总生存率为54．4％和67．1％（P＝0．040）,无瘤生存率为30．5％和57．3％（P＝0．001）。结论 对早期乳腺癌窝淋巴结转移≥4个的患者,术后放疗能显著降低局部区域复发率,提高生存率。建议对这部分患者做常规术后放疗。     

Adjuvant chemo- and hormonal therapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized clinical study

Between 1977 and 1980, 118 breast cancer patients with locally advanced disease, T3B-4, any N, M0 or T1-3, tumor positive axillary apex biopsy, were randomized to one of three arms: I: radiotherapy (RT) to the breast and adjacent lymph node areas; II: RT followed by 12 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5 fluorouracil (CMF) and tamoxifen during the chemotherapy period; III: 2 cycles of adriamycin and vincristine (AV), alternated with 2 cycles of CMF, then RT, followed by another 4 cycles of AV, alternated with 4 CMF; tamoxifen during the entire treatment period. The median follow-up period was 5 1/2 years. The adjuvant chemo- and hormonal therapy did not improve the overall survival; the 5-year survival was 37% for all three treatment arms. There was no statistically significant difference in RFS between the three modalities, nor when arm I was compared to arm II and III together, p = 0.11. Local recurrence (LR) was observed in 24 of the 86 patients (28%) who had reached complete remission (CR). LR was not statistically different over the three treatment arms. In 18 of the 24 patients with LR, distant metastases appeared within a few months from the local recurrence. In arm III, the CR rate after 4 cycles AV plus CMF and RT hardly changed after another 8 cycles of chemotherapy. The menopausal status did not influence the treatment results. Dose reduction in more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy was accompanied by better results, p = 0.04. In conclusion: adjuvant chemo- and hormonal therapy did not improve RFS and overall survival. These findings do not support the routine use of adjuvant chemo- and endocrine therapy for inoperable breast cancer.     

Tamoxifen in high-risk premenopausal women with primary breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Report from the Danish Breast Cancer co-operative Group DBCG 82B Trial

Following modified radical mastectomy, pre- and perimenopausal (amenorrhoea for < 5 years) patients with stage II or III breast cancer received CMF (cyclophosphamide 600, methotrexate 40, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks, 9 cycles). The effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) to adjuvant chemotherapy was examined by randomisation either to no additional treatment (n = 314), or concurrently TAM 30 mg daily for 1 year (n = 320). 40% had positive, 12% negative and 48% unknown receptor status. One year after surgery 21% versus 35% (CMF + TAM versus CMF) were still menstruating (P < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 12.2 years there was no difference in RFS (10-year RFS 34% versus 35%, P = 0.81) or OS (45% versus 46%, P = 0.73). In a Cox proportional hazards model, tumour size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, frequency of metastatic nodes in relation to total number of nodes removed, degree of anaplasia, age, and menostasia within the first year after operation were significant independent prognostic factors for RFS, and the same factors except age for OS. No significant interactions with TAM were seen. Thus, in this group of pre- and perimenopausal high-risk early breast cancer patients with heterogeneous receptor status given CMF i.v., concurrent TAM for 1 year did not improve the outcome. These results do not exclude that receptor positive patients may benefit from adjuvant TAM for longer periods given sequentially to chemotherapy.     

Less efficacy with alternating regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II node-positive breast cancer: results at 8 years (Pronacam 85).

A randomized trial to compare adjuvant treatment with an alternating regimen with conventional chemotherapy was performed. A total of 589 node-positive patients were included and stratified according to number of positive nodes (N1-3 and N > 4) and menopausal status. Premenopausal N1-3 patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) or CMF/4''-epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (EC), post-menopausal N1-3 patients to fluorouracil, 4 epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) or CMF/EC and pre- and post-menopausal patients with N > or = 4 to fluorouracil, 4'' epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, prednisone (FECMP) or CMF/EC. In premenopausal patients, CMF was superior to CMF/EC in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (65% vs 45%, P = 0.0149) and survival (72.3% vs 50.2%, P = 0.0220) whereas, for N > or = 4 patients, differences between FECMP and CMF/EC did not achieve statistical significance (DFS 35% vs 26.2%; survival 50% vs 38.1%, P = NS). For post-menopausal patients, FEC was superior to CMF/EC in DFS (58.6% vs 36.8%, P = 0.0215) and survival (66.2% vs 46%, P = 0.0155). In post-menopausal patients with N > 4, differences favouring CMF/EC were significant in DFS (40.4% vs 22%, P = 0.0371) but not in survival (47.4% vs 32.2%, P = 0.1185). Alternating regimens did not offer better results in premenopausal and post-menopausal N1-3 patients. Results regarding post-menopausal N > 4 women require further confirmation.     

Local-regional failure in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Risk factors for local-regional recurrence of breast cancer were analyzed in a retrospective review of 117 patients treated with adjuvant CMF (Cytoxan [Mead Johnson & Co, Evansville, Ind], methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) after radical or modified radical mastectomy at the Vincent T. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (Washington, DC). The median follow-up time was 50 months after mastectomy. The median time to recurrence was 23 months. The actuarial local-regional failure rate was 19% at five years. Risk of local failure correlated with size of primary (27% for T3 v 15% for T1) and axillary node status (36% for four or more positive nodes v 9% for three or fewer positive nodes). These findings suggest a rationale for the addition of postoperative radiation therapy in high-risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.     

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on cosmesis and complications in patients with breast cancer treated by definitive irradiation

From 1978 to 1981, 46 patients received primary radiotherapy following excisional biopsy and axillary staging procedure for Stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 27 patients who received radiation and completed 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or CMFP) and 19 patients who received radiation alone. All patients received radiation to the breast and regional nodes (4600-5000 rad) and a boost to the site of the primary tumor (1500-2000 rad). Median follow-up from completion of radiation was 26 months in the non-adjuvant and 24 months in the adjuvant group with a range of 12 to 49 months. Cosmesis was judged to be good to excellent in 89% (17/19) of the patients receiving radiation alone and 81% (22/27) of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Fair to poor cosmesis in the adjuvant group was attributed primarily to increased fibrosis and reduction of breast size. The single complication for which there was an increased incidence in the adjuvant group was arm edema (22 vs. 0%). The incidence of arm edema was unrelated to T stage, type of axillary surgical procedure, number of positive nodes, addition of prednisone or sequencing of chemotherapy. Further efforts should be directed towards minimizing complications and maximizing cosmesis without sacrificing relapse-free survival in patients receiving primary radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.