An estimate of risk of malignancy for a benign diagnosis in thyroid fine‐needle aspirates

BACKGROUND:

The risk of malignancy for a benign diagnosis in a thyroid fine‐needle aspiration is controversial because of lack of histologic follow‐up.

METHODS:

The author reviewed the results of all thyroid aspirations with surgical resection performed during the past 13 years at Baptist Hospital of Miami and Homestead Hospital, Homestead, Florida, combined these procedures with those in the literature, and correlated risk of malignancy with percentage of biopsies performed.

RESULTS:

A total of 7089 aspirations and 1331 resections were performed. In the literature, the percentage of all benign cases that underwent resection ranged from 3% to 41%. Risk of malignancy decreased with an increased percentage of resections. The risk of malignancy for series with <8% of all benign aspirates resected was significantly higher than the risk for series with ≥8% of cases biopsied (15.1% vs 5.9%, P = .02). Logarithmic and linear estimates of risk of malignancy if 100% of cases were biopsied were 3% and 2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The best estimate of the risk of malignancy for a benign diagnosis in a thyroid fine‐needle aspiration is 2.5%‐3%. This level of risk is affected by the percentage of benign cases that are resected. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

The impact of implementation of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology on the quality of reporting, "risk" of malignancy, surgical rate, and rate of frozen sections requested for thyroid lesions

BACKGROUND:

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has been anticipated to improve communication between pathologists and clinicians and thereby patient outcomes. In the current study, the impact of TBSRTC on various quality and outcome measures was assessed.

METHODS:

The current study included all patients who underwent fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) of the thyroid between April 2006 and April 2009. Before implementation, the authors used generic diagnostic categories; after implementation, TBSRTC was used. Quality of reporting, diagnostic categories, rate of surgery, rates of frozen section, the “risk” of malignancy after a cytologic diagnosis, and errors before and after implementation of TBSRTC were compared using the chi‐square and Fisher exact tests. Multilevel likelihood ratios and the receiver operating characteristic were used to compare the accuracy of FNA before and after implementation.

RESULTS:

A total of 1671 FNAs (957 obtained before and 714 obtained after implementation of TBSRTC) were obtained from 1339 patients. Of these, 301 patients (191 before and 110 after implementation) underwent subsequent surgical resection. Before implementation, the reports were more ambiguous (3.7% vs 0.5%; P < .05) and implicit (5.1% vs 2.7%; P < .05) than after implementation. The overall rate of surgery decreased after implementation of TBSRTC (24.5% vs 19.6%; P < .05). The overall risk of malignancy did not appear to be affected by implementation of TBSRTC, but it decreased significantly after a benign FNA diagnosis compared with a diagnosis of an atypical lesion or follicular neoplasm. The rate of frozen section remained unchanged. The diagnostic accuracy was not found to be significantly different before compared with after implementation of TBSRTC.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of TBSRTC appears to improve the quality of reporting by lowering the number of ambiguous and implicit diagnoses and decreases the overall surgery rates, particularly for benign lesions, but it does not appear to have any effect on the accuracy of FNA of the thyroid, false‐positive rates, or the frequency of intraoperative consultations. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Anatomical vs nonanatomical liver resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDThe long-term survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following anatomical resection (AR) vs non-anatomical resection (NAR) is still controversial. It is necessary to investigate which approach is better for patients with solitary HCC.AIMTo compare perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of AR and NAR for solitary HCC.METHODSWe performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Participants of any age and sex, who underwent liver resection, were considered following the following criteria: (1) Studies reporting AR vs NAR liver resection; (2) Studies focused on primary HCC with a solitary tumor; (3) Studies reporting the long-term survival outcomes (> 5 years); and (4) Studies including patients without history of preoperative treatment. The main results were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Perioperative outcomes were also compared.RESULTSA total of 14 studies, published between 2001 and 2020, were included in our meta-analysis, including 9444 patients who were mainly from China, Japan, and Korea. AR was performed on 4260 (44.8%) patients. The synthetic results showed that the 5-year OS [odds ratio (OR): 1.19; P < 0.001] and DFS (OR: 1.26; P < 0.001) were significantly better in the AR group than in the NAR group. AR was associated with longer operating time [mean difference (MD): 47.08; P < 0.001], more blood loss (MD: 169.29; P = 0.001), and wider surgical margin (MD = 1.35; P = 0.04) compared to NAR. There was no obvious difference in blood transfusion ratio (OR: 1.16; P = 0.65) or postoperative complications (OR: 1.24, P = 0.18).CONCLUSIONAR is superior to NAR in terms of long-term outcomes. Thus, AR can be recommended as a reasonable surgical option in patients with solitary HCC.     

Primary tumor resection in stage IV breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The impact of primary tumor resection (PTR) on survival is still controversial in stage IV breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of PTR on overall survival (OS) in stage IV breast cancer.

Combined portal vein resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To analyse the efficacy and safety of portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

Methods

A thorough search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM), and the Chinese Medical Current Contents (CMCC) databases was performed to identify comparative studies concerning combined portal vein resection (PVR) versus surgery without portal vein resection (Without PVR) and no surgical tumour resection (NR) in the treatment of HCCA.

Results

Thirteen studies with a total of 1921 HCCA cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that PVR was associated with a poorer overall survival than Without PVR (HR = 1.90; 95%CI 1.59–2.28; P < 0.00001) but was significantly better than NR (HR = 0.33; 95%CI 0.26–0.41; P < 0.00001). The PVR group exhibited significantly higher rates of advanced disease and a higher proportion of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.50; 95%CI 1.06–2.13; P = 0.02) and perineural invasion (OR = 2.95; 95%CI 1.80–4.84; P < 0.0001), and the PVR group exhibited a lower curative resection rate (OR = 0.65; 95%CI 0.46–0.91; P = 0.01). No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Conclusions

Combined PVR is safe and feasible in the treatment of HCCA when the portal vein is grossly involved. For advanced HCCA when the portal vein is grossly involved, surgical resection including PVR can benefit the overall survival in certain patients. However, further randomised controlled trials are necessary to determine the prognostic effects of the addition of PVR to the surgical procedure.     

Safety of radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers.

Materials and methods: Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Library of Cochrane databases were searched up to 12 July 2016 for studies on the safety of RFA for treating benign thyroid nodules or recurrent thyroid cancers. Pooled proportions of overall and major complications were assessed using random-effects modelling. Heterogeneity among studies was determined using the χ² statistic for the pooled estimates and the inconsistency index I².

Results: A total of 24 eligible studies were included, giving a sample size of 2421 patients and 2786 thyroid nodules. 41 major complications and 48 minor complications of RFA were reported, giving a pooled proportion of 2.38% for overall RFA complications [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42%–3.34%] and 1.35% for major RFA complications (95% CI: 0.89%–1.81%). There were no heterogeneities in either overall or major complications (I²?=?1.24%–21.79%). On subgroup analysis, the overall and major complication rates were significantly higher for malignant thyroid nodules than for benign thyroid nodules (p?=?0.0011 and 0.0038, respectively).

Conclusions: RFA was found to be safe for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers.     

Hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background & Aims

According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) should be recommended in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within and beyond the BCLC stage A, respectively. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the overall survival between HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection and TACE.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched. All relevant studies were considered, if they reported the survival data in HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection and TACE. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the comparison of cumulative overall survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95%CIs were calculated for the comparison of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the BCLC stages and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Sensitivity analyses were performed in moderate- and high-quality studies and in studies published after 2005.

Results

Fifty of 2029 retrieved papers were included. One, 15, and 34 studies were of high-, moderate-, and low-quality, respectively. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly higher overall survival in hepatic resection group than in TACE group (HR=0.60, 95%CI=0.55-0.66). Additionally, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were statistically significantly higher in hepatic resection group than in TACE group (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.56-2.14; OR=3.09, 95%CI=2.60-3.67; OR=3.48, 95%CI=2.83-4.27). The subgroup meta-analyses confirmed the statistical significance in HCC within the BCLC stage A (HR=0.72, 95%CI=0.64-0.80), in HCC beyond the BCLC stage A (HR=0.60, 95%CI=0.51-0.69), in HCC within the BCLC stage B alone (HR=0.48, 95%CI=0.25-0.90), and in HCC with PVTT (HR=0.78, 95%CI=0.68-0.91). The statistical significance was also confirmed by sensitivity analyses in moderate- and high-quality studies (HR=0.62, 95%CI=0.53-0.71) and in studies published after 2005 (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.53-0.66).

Conclusions

Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, hepatic resection may be considered in HCC beyond the BCLC stage A. However, given the limitations of study quality, more well-designed randomized controlled trials should be warranted to confirm these findings.     

Association between R1 resection and oncological outcome in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors without tumor rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe influence of positive microscopic margin (R1) resection on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is controversial. Tumor rupture is significantly associated with the occurrence of R1 resection and may be a confounder of R1 resection in GISTs. The present meta-analysis evaluated the real influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GISTs by excluding the confounding effect of tumor rupture.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Studies that compared R1 with negative microscopic margin (R0) resection in GIST patients and reported the time-to-event data of recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.ResultsOf the 4896 records screened, 23 retrospective studies with 6248 participants were selected. In the overall analysis, R1 resection resulted in a significantly shorter RFS/DFS than R0 resection for GISTs (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.54–2.10, P < 0.001, I² = 14%). However, the inferior RFS/DFS vanished when tumor rupture cases were excluded (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.98–1.83, P = 0.07, I² = 33%). Sensitivity analysis by high-quality studies brought about a more robust HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 0.88–1.50, P = 0.29), with low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The qualities of evidence for the outcomes were high.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that R1 resection did not influence the survival outcome of GISTs. Reresection may not be necessary when positive microscopic margins exist. This analysis could provide high-quality evidence for the development of guidelines.     

Laparoscopic synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: A systematic review

While colorectal and hepatic resections are commonly performed through a laparoscopic approach, the safety and feasibility of total laparoscopic synchronous resections (LSR) of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) have not been established. In this systematic review, short- and long-term outcomes were comparable for patients undergoing LSR and open synchronous resection. LSR was safe and feasible for patients with synchronous CRLM and should be considered in well-selected patients.     

Molecular cytopathology for thyroid nodules: A review of methodology and test performance

Advances in the molecular characterization of thyroid cancers have fueled the development of genetic and gene expression‐based tests for thyroid fine‐needle aspirations. Collectively, these tests are designed to improve the diagnostic certainty of thyroid cytology. This review summarizes the early published experience with the commercially available versions of these tests: the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier, ThyGenX (formerly miRInform)/ThyraMIR, and ThyroSeq. Key differences in testing approaches and issues regarding test performance and interpretation are also discussed. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2016;124:14–27. © 2015 American Cancer Society.     

The prognostic impacts of postoperative radiotherapy in the patients with resected anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundOptimal postoperative managements for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) have not yet been sufficiently clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focussing on the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the patients with resected ATC.Materials and methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed in the several databases. We included the studies that reported survival outcome in the patients with or without PORT following any type of surgical resection except biopsy only. Hazard ratio (HR) was extracted, and the random-effects model was used for the pooled analysis.ResultsSeventeen retrospective studies including 1147 analysable patients met all inclusion criteria. The overall research quality was relatively low with considerable methodological limitations. The pooled results showed that PORT significantly reduced the risk of death in all the patients with resected ATC compared with those with surgery alone (HR, 0.556; 95% confidence interval, 0.419–0.737; p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses demonstrated that patients with stage IVA (HR, 0.364; p = 0.012) and IVB (HR, 0.460; p = 0.059) may also have survival benefit from PORT, whereas stage IVC may not. No evidence of publication bias was found (p = 0.352).ConclusionsThis study is the first meta-analysis assessing PORT in patients with ATC and provides convincing evidence that adequate resection followed by PORT may offer the prolonged survival. However, without evidence based on prospective randomised trials, it is still not known which subset of patients can really benefit from PORT.     

Indeterminate nodules by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in Israel: Frequency,and risk of malignancy after reclassification of follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like features

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the frequency and risk of malignancy (ROM) for indeterminate thyroid nodules, categories III (B3) and IV (B4) of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC), at a large institution in Israel. Additionally, we investigated the impact of redefining follicular neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) as non-malignant on malignancy rates.MethodsIn this retrospective study of all thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) performed at Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center between January 2013 and December 2015, we assessed ROM for B3 and B4 nodules. Potential risk factors thought to affect a-priori ROM were assessed. Suspected NIFTP lesions were re-examined, and if proven, reclassified as benign.Results3701 nodules were sampled in 2919 FNAs performed on 2674 patients. B3 reports comprised 7.7% of all nodules (n = 284); B4 represented 3.6% (n = 132). In multivariate logistic regression, male gender, being of former Soviet Union origin, and smoking increased ROM for B3 nodules by a factor of 7.97 (P = 0.002; CI: 2.2–23.4), 9.15 (P = 0.021; CI:1.4–60.0), and 11.0 (P = 0.001; CI 2.8–44.8), respectively. Reclassifying NIFTP decreased ROM from 14% to 12.5% for B3, and from 26.7% to 25% for B4 nodules. NIFTP comprised 9.5% of previously diagnosed resected malignant tumors.ConclusionsThe relative frequencies of B3 and B4 nodules and their associated malignancy rates were consistent with previous series. Risk factors identified for malignancy may help characterize patients most likely to benefit from surgery. Reclassifying NIFTP had a substantial impact on the ROM in the resected tumors previously diagnosed as malignant.