Acute changes in somatosensory evoked potentials following graded experimental spinal cord compression

Amplitude and latency of cortical somatosensory potentials evoked in cats by peripheral nerve stimulation were measured before, during, and for 5 hours after injury of spinal cord segment L-7 by a predetermined degree and duration of compression. An amplitude decrease, slight and transitory, was first observed after compression reduced the segmental cross section by 60%. After an 80% compression, amplitude reduction was initially larger and lasted longer, but recovered 2.5 hours after injury to a level that did not differ statistically from control values. After total (100%) compression, evoked responses disappeared abruptly and did not recover significantly. Latency was unaltered at all degrees of compression. Structural damage increased with the degree of compression. In this model, evoked potential changes neither reflect nor predict the magnitude of acute incomplete spinal cord injury.     

Monitoring of spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery

Repair of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm involves a significant risk of ischemic injury to the spinal cord. Standard monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials, which relies upon peripheral nerve stimulation, becomes nonspecific and insensitive during this surgery when aortic cross-clamping produces lower extremity ischemia causing a peripheral conduction block. Techniques for the insertion of percutaneous epidural electrodes, developed originally for pain management, have been adapted to this setting to permit direct stimulation of the spinal cord for intraoperative monitoring of evoked potentials. The clinical outcome in patients monitored by this technique has been consistent with evoked potential findings.     

Successful monitoring of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials elicited by anterior spinal cord stimulation through thoracoscopy during spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Neurogenic mixed evoked potentials were recorded after thoracoscopic spinal cord stimulation in patients undergoing video-assisted spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility and value of thoracoscopic spinal cord monitoring. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Video-assisted thoracic surgery recently has been proposed as a new technique for thoracic spine surgery. It can be used for anterior spinal release of patients with severe spinal deformities and for thoracic hernia removal. METHODS: Five patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery for spinal fusion were studied. Neurogenic mixed evoked potentials were elicited by electrodes seated into intervertebral discs through thoracoscopy and recorded from peripheral nerves of the lower limbs. Moreover, the study included the case of a patient with a thoracic hernia who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery with combined thoracoscopic neurogenic mixed evoked potential and standard somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. RESULTS: Neurogenic mixed evoked potentials were recorded consistently after spinal cord stimulation in all patients. For the patient with a thoracic hernia, neurogenic mixed evoked potentials suddenly disappeared, whereas somatosensory evoked potentials were not significantly modified, leading to surgery interruption. Neurogenic mixed evoked potentials progressively reappeared after a 30-minute delay. Postoperation examination revealed a Brown-Sequard's syndrome with incomplete right motor deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Neurogenic mixed evoked potentials evoked by anterior stimulation through thoracoscopy are of interest for spinal cord monitoring when posterior electrical stimulation is impossible, and they provide reliable information regarding spinal motor pathways.     

Spinal cord evoked injury potentials in patients with acute spinal cord injury

Six patients were examined in the acute stage of spinal cord injury, between 11 h and 12 days posttrauma. Quadripolar epidural electrodes were positioned either percutaneously using a Tuohy needle or directly into the epidural space during surgical intervention. These electrodes were combined with a common reference to obtain monopolar recordings of spinal cord evoked potentials resulting from either median nerve stimulation at the wrist or tibial nerve stimulation at the popliteal fossa. Spinal cord evoked injury potentials (SCEIPs), stationary potentials with positive polarity on the distal aspect of the lesion and negative polarity on the proximal aspect, were recorded in all cases. The average amplitude (n = 3) of the SCEIP resulting from tibial nerve stimulation as measured across the lesion was 13.5 microV with an average duration of 12.7 msec. For median nerve stimulation, the average amplitude (n = 3) of the SCEIP was 16.3 microV with an average duration of 6.7 msec. There was a change in polarity in all cases over a distance of less than 6 mm, the distance between the electrode contacts on the epidural electrode. In one case, recordings were performed initially at 11 h and repeated at 21 days posttrauma. In the latter recording, the SCEIP was still present but was five times smaller in amplitude. Coincidentally, the patient also showed clinical signs of improvement in sensory and motor spinal cord function. This study demonstrates the feasibility of recording the SCEIP in patients with acute spinal cord injury, describes the features of these SCEIPs, discusses their origins, and explores the utility of recording the SCEIP as an aid in determining the severity of the injury as well as a means of monitoring changes in spinal cord function.     

Analysis of spinal cord evoked potential and locomotor function during acute spinal cord compression in cats.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not conductive spinal cord evoked potentials and spinal cord function change correspondingly with each other. The relationship between conductive spinal cord evoked potentials and locomotor function during acute spinal cord compression in animals was investigated. In decerebrate cats, controlled locomotion can be induced by electrical stimuli in the mesencephalic locomotor region. Conductive spinal cord evoked potentials were recorded at the L3 level of the spinal cord and stimuli were given at the T4 segment. The locomotor function was evaluated through electromyograms of the hind limbs. By compressing the spinal cord at L1, both the conductive spinal cord evoked potentials and the locomotor function gradually decreased. When the first negative potential amplitude of conductive spinal cord evoked potentials was decreased to half the level found in normal cats, locomotor function was injured irreversibly. These results showed that changes in the conductive spinal cord evoked potentials were related to changes in locomotor function. The 50% level of the first negative potential amplitude was considered to be the critical level at which irreversible spinal cord paralysis occurred in the cats.     

Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring during surgery for scoliosis using somatosensory evoked potentials

The method of intra-operative monitoring of spinal cord function by spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), as used at the Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children during surgery for scoliosis is described. Using a non-polarisable platinum spinal epidural electrode, SEP elicited by tibial and peroneal nerve stimulation in the popliteal fossa are recorded proximal to the level of spinal correction. The large amplitude and discrete waveform of the SEP enable rapid signal acquisition and easy interpretation. The spinal SEP is stable under both therapeutic hypotension and general anaesthesia. Electrophysiological monitoring has now superceded the 'wake-up' test as an index of spinal cord function during corrective surgery for scoliosis.     

Comparison of evoked spinal potentials by stimulation of the sciatic nerve and the spinal cord

Spinal cord monitoring during surgery using evoked spinal potentials (ESP) is now popular. In cats, ESPs due to both sciatic nerve (SN-ESP) and spinal cord stimulation (SC-AESP and SC-DESP) were recorded from the epidural space. Both SN-ESP and SC-AESP were compared by parameter studies. Stimulus frequencies up to 100 Hz did not significantly alter the SC-AESP, whereas the later components of the SN-ESP decreased greatly in amplitude. The SN-ESP was more sensitive to asphyxia than the SC-AESP. Augmentation of the ESP occurred approximately 5 minutes after the asphyxia was introduced, which was interpreted as an impending sign of anoxia of the spinal cord. The SN-ESP had more potentials arising from synaptic and postsynaptic activities, while the SC-AESP was mainly derived from the spinal tracts. To monitor the function of the spinal cord, both methods should be used.     

Spinal cord monitoring using evoked potentials recorded from feline vertebral bone

A new recording method for continuous spinal cord monitoring has been developed at Rancho Los Amigo Hospital. Using peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal evoked potentials (SEPs) are recorded from cancellous bone of spinous processes. This neurologically noninvasive technique provides a highly reproducible and consistent signal, unaffected by biologic noise and surgical handling of the spinal column. Moreover, the evoked response is extremely sensitive to changes in functional integrity of the spinal cord. In experimental spinal cord injuries, produced by localized distraction of the spine, changes of the evoked responses were well correlated with the change in spinal cord function.     

Spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Although monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials elicited from stimulation of lower extremity peripheral nerves has been suggested as a method for assessing neural function during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, this technique has been reported to yield a large number of false positives. It was believed that direct stimulation of the spinal cord would eliminate some of the problems associated with peripheral evoked potentials. The present study compared in 18 patients the use of scalp recorded evoked potential following stimulation of either the posterior tibial nerve via percutaneous needles or the spinal cord via an epidural electrode previously placed fluoroscopically. In 10 patients in whom distal bypass or shunt was not used, peripheral evoked potentials totally disappeared within 5-30 min of aortic clamping. Spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials disappeared permanently in 2 patients shortly after aortic cross-clamping; 1 died shortly after the procedure, and the other awoke densely paraplegic and died the next day. When distal perfusion was maintained by shunt or bypass, the disappearance of both peripheral and spinal evoked potentials accurately predicted the neurologic outcome of 1 paralyzed patient. Loss of spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials was found to be correlated with adverse neurologic outcome. Over the period of aortic clamping a gradual decrease in mean amplitude (50% at 45 min [P less than 0.05]) and a 20% increase in mean latency time were observed. Maintenance of adequate distal perfusion may permit the use of peripheral evoked potentials in the assessment of spinal cord ischemia during aortic cross-clamping.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Level diagnosis of cervical myelopathy using evoked spinal cord potentials

The ESCPs (evoked spinal cord potentials) resulting from both median nerve and spinal cord stimulation were recorded from the interlaminar yellow ligaments posteriorly or intervertebral discs anteriorly on patients with cervical myelopathy in order to determine the most significant lesion in the spinal cord electrophysiologically. The normal median-nerve-evoked spinal cord potential (MN-ESCP) consisted of P1N1 and N2(P2) deflections, while normal spinal cord-ascending evoked spinal cord potential (SC-AESCP) consisted of N1 and N2 deflections. The abnormal ESCPs obtained from 65 patients were classified into three grades. The spinal level recording the highest grade of ESCP, which was mostly positive wave, generally corresponded to the level that was clearly diagnosed as the main lesion by neurologic and radiologic examinations, such as a case of single level disc hernia. With these techniques, the level diagnostic rates of primary lesions were 94.7% in posterior recordings and 74.1% in anterior recordings.     

Effect of hemorrhagic shock upon spinal cord blood flow and evoked potentials

Although somatosensory evoked potentials are being used in the evaluation of spinal cord injury and the monitoring of cord function during surgical procedures, their limitations in the face of fluctuations in blood pressure await further clarification. To study the effect of hypotension upon spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) and spinal evoked potentials (SEPs), we subjected five anesthetized lambs to graded hypotension to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 80, 60, 40, and less than or equal to 30 mm Hg. Five animals served as controls. Maximal hypotension was associated with a significant decrease in renal and sciatic nerve blood flow of 83% and 77%, respectively. SCBF, on the other hand, showed no decrease with hypotension down to a MAP of 40 mm Hg. As hypotension progressed, a gradual but significant slowing in nerve conduction velocity was noted without alteration in the cord conduction velocity from L7 to L1. Control animals demonstrated a decline in sciatic nerve blood flow of 48%, without any change in latency or amplitude of nerve action potentials. These findings suggest that, in hypotension, the peripheral nerve (lacking autoregulation) becomes ischemic, resulting in slowing of nerve conduction velocity with an increase in latency and decrease in amplitude of SEPs. Cord conduction velocity, on the other hand, remains unchanged. Caution is advised in relying upon SEPs generated by peripheral nerve stimulation to monitor cord function in situations where profound hypotension is anticipated. Variations in SEPs may reflect alterations in the peripheral nerve and not the spinal cord.     

Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials

Summary We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.     

Changes in the evoked spinal cord potentials associated with chronic experimental cord compression.

To determine the functional changes occurring in the early period after the development of chronic cord compression, an ossification of the ligamentum flavum model, which is a model of chronic cord compression, was created in domestic rabbits using bone morphogenetic protein, and monitored evoked spinal cord potentials. Sixty-seven rabbits were used for these experiments. Myelography, evoked spinal cord potential measurements, and histologic examinations were performed in 16 of the ossification of the ligamentum flavum rabbits and six of the healthy control rabbits. Our results show that 1) mild degrees of cord compression produce greater evoked spinal cord potential alterations in chronic than in acute compression, as reported in the literature; 2) chronic compression from the dorsal side produces injury in the superficial layer of the dorsal column and dorsolateral column; and 3) changes in evoked spinal cord potentials precede the development of paralysis and histologic changes.     

Spinal cord evoked potential

Spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) used as a technique for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring can be divided into several groups depending on the stimulation method. SCEP evoked by direct motor cortex stimulation enables the recording of the descending volley passing through the corticospinal tract. Such potentials are termed D (direct)- and I (indirect)-waves. D-wave reflects the function of the corticospinal tract directly and is regarded as an appropriate parameter for the intraoperative monitoring of motor function. On the other hand, the corticospinal tract may be activated by transcranial stimulation and a potential similar to D-wave can be recorded from the spinal epidural space. Previous studies, however, indicated that the site of transcranial stimulation is around the lower level of the brainstem and the response includes the potentials coming from other neural tracts. In addition, the responses of SCEPs evoked by spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulations are generally considered to reflect mainly the function of the deep sensory pathway. Therefore, SCEPs evoked by transcranial, spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulations cannot be used as a parameter to monitor motor function directly. It is particularly important to know the characteristics of each SCEP and apply each potential to the most appropriate situation.     

Assessment of spinal cord relative vulnerability in C4–C5 compressive cervical myelopathy using multi-modal spinal cord evoked potentials and neurological findings

Objective: The correlation between the progression of spinal cord lesions using spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and neurological findings are unclear. The purpose is to electrophysiologically evaluate relative vulnerability of spinal cord in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM) at C4–C5 intervertebral level using SCEPs and correlate the progression of spinal cord lesions with neurological findings.Design: Retrospective study.Setting: Yamaguchi University Hospital.Participants: 36 patients.Methods: SCEPs following median nerve stimulation (MN-SCEPs), ulnar nerve stimulation (UN-SCEPs), transcranial electric stimulation (TCE-SCEPs), and spinal cord stimulation (SC-SCEPs) were intraoperatively recorded. MN-SCEPs are mediated by posterior horns (4, 5 layers), UN-SCEPs by the Burdach tract, TCE-SCEPs by the lateral corticospinal tract, and SC-SCEPs by the Goll tract. We evaluated the neurological findings (numbness, tactile sense and pain sense in the C6 area, tactile sense in the lower extremities, and triceps tendon reflex [TTR]).Results: The incidence of electrophysiological and clinical abnormalities decreased in the order of UN-SCEPs (100%), TCE-SCEPs (94.4%), MN-SCEPs (77.8%), and SC-SCEPs (69.4%), and in the order of numbness (100%), pain sense (97.2%), TTR (91.7%), tactile sense in the C6 area (83.3%), and tactile sense in the lower extremities (70.0%), respectively.Conclusions: The relative vulnerability of spinal cord occurred in the order of the Burdach tract, the lateral corticospinal tract, posterior horns (4, 5 layers), and the Goll tract in most patients with CCM at the C4–C5 intervertebral level.     

Evaluation of motor- and sensory-evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of spinal cord monitorings for prediction of spinal cord ischemia, we investigated the role of both motor evoked potentials and sensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries. METHODS: We monitored two kinds of sensory evoked potentials; descending evoked spinal cord potentials from the lumbar enlargement after cervical spinal cord stimulation and segmental evoked spinal cord potentials at the lumbar enlargement elicited by peroneal nerve stimulation, and motor evoked potentials from the lumbar enlargement elicited by direct subcranial stimulation in 9 thoracoabdomonal aortic aneurysm surgeries. RESULTS: Postoperative paraplegia occurred in one case in which the patients died during the perioperative period. One case showed transient paraparesis, but recovered following rehabilitatation. These cases showed a decrease in the amplitude of descending evoked spinal cord potentials and motor evoked potentials. CONCLUSION: The recovery of the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and the descending evoked spinal cord potentials after declamping correlated with the neurologic outcome.     

Intraoperative monitoring of spinal interventions with evoked potentials

Monitoring the spinal cord can improve the safety margin during spinal surgery. This technique requires a stimulus source, transmitted through filters and amplifiers, and resulting in an enhanced signal that is recorded. Several techniques are now available, both non-invasive and invasive. We have carried out intraoperative monitoring during 178 spinal operations to correct deformities. Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) were obtained with Fz-Cz' recording sites, following bilateral posterior tibial nerve stimulation. In addition, unilateral median nerve stimulation was performed as a control. Six cases with an intraoperative alteration in waveform are described.     

Evaluation of cervical cord function using spinal evoked potentials from surface electrode.

Spinal evoked potentials from cervical skin surface (surface spinal evoked potentials) were measured to evaluate spinal cord function as a convenient method that precludes inserting electrodes into the epidural space, and results were compared with those of the former epidural recording method. Surface spinal evoked potentials were obtained from cervical skin surface over the C3, C5, and C7 spinous processes after median nerve stimulation in 18 normal subjects and 37 patients with a cervical lesion. In normal subjects, surface spinal evoked potentials consisted of three negative waves (N1, N2, N3). Abnormal N2 (80%) and abnormal N3 (100%) were observed in cervical myelopathy, and abnormal N2 was observed only in radiculopathy; this allows for differentiation between myelopathy and radiculopathy. Comparing preoperative and postoperative surface spinal evoked potentials, it was seen that improvement of clinical symptoms was proportional to that of surface spinal evoked potentials.     

Spinal cord monitoring. Electrophysiological measures of sensory and motor function during spinal surgery

Various recording methods were tested in 60 patients who underwent scoliosis surgery to find the most suitable technique for the spinal cord monitoring and to elucidate the neuroanatomic relationship of the evoked potentials recorded by these methods. Responses were recorded from the scalp and spine after stimulation of the tibial nerve or the spinal cord. The potentials from electrodes placed over the muscles and the tibial nerve after stimulation of the spinal cord were also recorded. Epidurally recorded spinal evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve generally consisted of two major negative peaks, NI and NII, and subsequent multiple waves. NI may be mediated through the spinocerebellar tract, and NII is most likely mediated through the dorsal column. The polyphasic waves are probably conducted through the slower sensory ascending pathways. The potentials recorded from the muscle after spinal cord stimulation may be mediated through the motor tract. Various recording techniques described in this study were mutually complimentary in confirming the results of tests recorded in the technically difficult environment of the operating room. In general, spinal cord stimulation recorded from the scalp or the spine was superior to peripheral nerve stimulation in yielding better defined responses. If the potential recorded from the muscle after stimulation of the spinal cord is indeed mediated through the motor pathway, this would be useful to assess motor function during surgery.     

Intraoperative evoked potentials recorded in man directly from dorsal roots and spinal cord

Direct spinal cord surface recordings of evoked spinal cord potentials have been made in 26 patients during neurosurgical procedures for intractable pain. Monopolar recordings at the dorsal root entry zone after peripheral nerve stimulation have been made at multiple levels for segmental localization and to monitor the state of the afferent path and dorsal horn. Dorsal root and dorsal column conduction has been tested on diseased and intact sides. Normal afferent conduction velocity was found to have an overall mean of 61.33 m/sec for cervicothoracic and lumbosacral peripheral nerves, and 50 m/sec for the dorsal columns. The normal mean amplitude for the slow negative wave (N1) recorded at the root entry was 52.54 muV, while that for the dorsal column conducted response recorded within 4 cm of the stimulus point on the dorsal columns was 347.5 muV. Several different placements of stimulating and recording electrodes are described, as well as their application. An interpretation of the resulting data is proposed.