烧伤治愈患者持续烧伤相关性疼痛的特点

目的探讨烧伤治愈患者持续烧伤相关性疼痛(persistent burn-related pain,PBRP)的特点。方法方便性抽样选择温州医学院附属第一医院烧伤科1 018例成人烧伤治愈患者为研究对象,调查其是否存在PBRP、PBRP的强度及其对日常生活的影响,并比较PBRP者和未发生PBRP者的临床特点。结果最终有390例患者纳入分析,其中94例(24.1%)存在PBRP,PBRP者与未发生PBRP者相比,烧伤面积和住院时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PBRP者在调查前1周的最重疼痛、平均疼痛和目前疼痛的评分均处于中等程度;PBRP对日常生活有影响的7个评估指标中,影响程度最大的是"睡眠"和"工作"。结论部分烧伤患者治愈后会存在PBRP,其发生原因可能与烧伤面积与住院时间有关;疼痛强度通常为中等程度,对日常生活有明显不良影响;护理人员要加强对PBRP的认识,重视烧伤治愈患者的社区护理工作。     

烧伤并发抑郁患者对不同情绪图片注意的空间偏向研究

目的:研究烧伤并发抑郁情绪患者注意的空间偏向。方法:40例烧伤患者按有无抑郁情绪分为抑郁组和无抑郁组各20例,另设正常对照组26例,均采用Posner点探测实验范式及国际情绪刺激图片系统进行检测,分析烧伤并发抑郁患者对不同情绪图片注意的空间偏向。结果:与无抑郁组及对照组比较,抑郁组患者对负性图片的注意反应时短,正确率高,对阈下负性图片的注意偏向明显,在注意任务过程中倾向于选择负性情绪刺激(P0.05、0.01)。结论:烧伤并发抑郁患者认知过程中注意的负性选择偏向可能是其负性情绪的重要认知中介。     

Acute pain in an emergency clinic: Latency of onset and descriptor patterns related to different injuries

Features of acute pain were examined in patients at an emergency clinic. Patients who had severe, life-threatening injuries or who were agitated, drunk, or ‘in shock’ were excluded from the study. Of 138 patients who were alert, rational and coherent, 51 (37%) stated that they did not feel pain at the time of injury. The majority of these patients reported onset of pain within an hour of injury, although the delays were as long as 9 h or more in some patients. The predominant emotions of the patients were embarrassment at appearing careless or worry about loss of wages. None expressed any pleasure or indicated any prospect of gain as a result of the injury.The occurrence of delays in pain onset was related to the nature of the injury. Of 46 patients whose injuries were limited to skin (lacerations, cuts, abrasions, burns), 53% had a pain-free period. Of 86 patients with deep-tissue injuries (fractures, sprains, bruises, amputation of a finger, stabs and crushes), only 28% had a pain-free period. The McGill Pain Questionnaire was administered to patients who felt pain immediately after injury or after a delay, and revealed a normal distribution of sensory scores but very low affective scores compared to patients with chronic pain. The results indicate that the relationship between injury and pain is highly variable and complex.     

A half-century of burn epidemiology and burn care in a rural state

The aim of this study is to quantify the changes in incidence, severity, and mortality in burn injuries in the state of Maine over the past 50 years from both prevention and treatment perspectives. The authors analyzed the data from multiple sources, including the U.S. Census, death certificates, hospital discharge abstracts, and institutional burn registries in Maine and Boston. The average annual number of burn-related deaths decreased from 53 in 1960-1964 to 14 in 2004-2008. The Maine age-adjusted rate of burn deaths was 8.6% above the national rate in 1960 and 1.4% below it in 2006. The annual number of burn patients admitted to Maine hospitals declined by 65% from 1978 to 2009. Since 1999, 12% of hospitalized patients in Maine were treated in an American Burn Association-certified burn center in Boston. Mortality for Maine burn patients, including those treated at Boston hospitals, is directly related to age and burn severity and similar to stratified mortality in the National Burn Repository. Incidence, severity, and mortality of burn injuries in Maine have decreased dramatically over the past 5 decades. Prevention programs, legislation, and a regionalized system of burn care have all likely contributed to bringing Maine's morbidity and mortality rate below the national average.     

Catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype predicts pain severity in hospitalized burn patients

Increasing evidence suggests that stress system activation after burn injury may contribute to burn-related pain. If this is the case, then genetic variations influencing the function of important stress system components, such as the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), may predict pain severity after thermal burn injury. The authors evaluated the association between COMT genotype and pain intensity in 57 individuals hospitalized after thermal burn injury. Consenting participants at four burn centers were genotyped and completed daily 0 to 10 numeric rating scale pain assessments on 2 consecutive days including evaluation of waking, least, and worst pain. The association between COMT genotype and individual pain outcomes was calculated using a linear mixed model adjusting for sociodemographic and burn injury characteristics. Overall pain (combination of least, worst, and waking pain scores) was significantly higher in patients with a COMT pain vulnerable genotype (6.3 [0.4] vs 5.4 [0.4], P = .037). Individuals with a COMT pain vulnerable genotype also had significantly higher "least pain" scores (3.8 [0.5] vs 2.6 [0.4], P = .017) and significantly higher pain on awakening (6.8 [0.5] vs 5.3 [0.4], P = .004). Differences in worst pain according to genotype group were not significant. COMT pain vulnerable genotype was a stronger predictor of overall pain severity than burn size, burn depth, or time from admission to pain interview assessment. These findings suggest that genetic factors influencing stress system function may have an important influence on pain severity after burn injury. Further studies of genetic predictors of pain after burn injury are needed.     

Hypnotherapy in management of pain and reexperiencing of trauma in burn patients

This study examined the effects of hypnosis on both pain and reexperiencing of trauma in burn patients. Forty-four patients hospitalized for burn care were randomly assigned to either hypnotherapy or a control group. Direct and indirect hypnotic suggestions were used to reduce pain and reexperiencing of trauma. All patients received routine burn care. Pain reports were quantified by using a self-report numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 5. The number of recalled vivid, troubling events of the trauma in 24-hour intervals was used for rating the reexperiencing of trauma. The hypnotherapy group showed significantly lower pain ratings than the control group and reported a significant reduction in pain from baseline. There was a significant reduction in trauma reexperience scores in the hypnotherapy group but not the control group. The findings support the efficacy of hypnotherapy in the management of both pain and reexperiencing of trauma in burn patients.     

Hypnotherapy in Management of Pain and Reexperiencing of Trauma in Burn Patients

This study examined the effects of hypnosis on both pain and reexperiencing of trauma in burn patients. Forty-four patients hospitalized for burn care were randomly assigned to either hypnotherapy or a control group. Direct and indirect hypnotic suggestions were used to reduce pain and reexperiencing of trauma. All patients received routine burn care. Pain reports were quantified by using a self-report numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 5. The number of recalled vivid, troubling events of the trauma in 24-hour intervals was used for rating the reexperiencing of trauma. The hypnotherapy group showed significantly lower pain ratings than the control group and reported a significant reduction in pain from baseline. There was a significant reduction in trauma reexperience scores in the hypnotherapy group but not the control group. The findings support the efficacy of hypnotherapy in the management of both pain and reexperiencing of trauma in burn patients.     

Burn injury pain: the continuing challenge.

The development of more effective methods of relieving pain associated with burn injury is a major unmet medical need. Not only is acute burn injury pain a source of immense suffering, but it has been linked to debilitating chronic pain and stress-related disorders. Although pain management guidelines and protocols have been developed and implemented, unrelieved moderate-to-severe pain continues to be reported after burn injury. One reason for this is that the intensity of pain associated with wound care and rehabilitation therapy, the major source of severe pain in this patient population, varies widely over the 3 phases of burn recovery, making it difficult to estimate analgesic requirements. The effects of opioids, the most commonly administered analgesics for burn injury procedural pain, are difficult to gauge over the course of burn recovery because the need for an opioid may change rapidly, resulting in the overmedication or undermedication of burn-injured patients. Understanding the mechanisms that contribute to the intensity and variability of burn injury pain over time is crucial to its proper management. We provide an overview of the types of pain associated with a burn injury, describe how these different types of pain interfere with the phases of burn recovery, and summarize pharmacologic pain management strategies across the continuum of burn care. We conclude with a discussion and suggestions for improvement. Rational management, based on the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the intensity and variability of burn injury pain, is in its infancy. The paucity of information highlights the need for research that explores and advances the identification of mechanisms of acute and chronic burn injury pain. PERSPECTIVE: Researchers continue to report that burn pain is undertreated. This review examines burn injury pain management across the phases of burn recovery, emphasizing 3 types of pain that require separate assessment and management. It provides insights and suggestions for future research directions to address this significant clinical problem.     

Virtual reality pain control during burn wound debridement in the hydrotank

OBJECTIVE: Most burn-injured patients rate their pain during burn wound debridement as severe to excruciating. We explored the adjunctive use of water-friendly, immersive virtual reality (VR) to distract patients from their pain during burn wound debridement in the hydrotherapy tank (hydrotank). SETTING: This study was conducted on inpatients at a major regional burn center. PATIENTS: Eleven hospitalized inpatients ages 9 to 40 years (mean age, 27 y) had their burn wounds debrided and dressed while partially submerged in the hydrotank. INTERVENTION: Although a nurse debrided the burn wound, each patient spent 3 minutes of wound care with no distraction and 3 minutes of wound care in VR during a single wound care session (within-subject condition order randomized). OUTCOME MEASURES: Three 0 to 10 graphic rating scale pain scores (worst pain, time spent thinking about pain, and pain unpleasantness) for each of the 2 treatment conditions served as the primary dependent variables. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly less pain when distracted with VR [eg, "worst pain" ratings during wound care dropped from "severe" (7.6) to "moderate" (5.1)]. The 6 patients who reported the strongest illusion of "going inside" the virtual world reported the greatest analgesic effect of VR on worst pain ratings, dropping from severe pain (7.2) in the no VR condition to mild pain (3.7) during VR. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide the first available evidence from a controlled study that immersive VR can be an effective nonpharmacologic pain reduction technique for burn patients experiencing severe to excruciating pain during wound care. The potential applications of VR analgesia to other painful procedures (eg, movement or exercise therapy) and other pain populations are discussed.     

Use of virtual reality for adjunctive treatment of adult burn pain during physical therapy: a controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The pain experienced by burn patients during physical therapy range of motion exercises can be extreme and can discourage patients from complying with their physical therapy. We explored the novel use of immersive virtual reality (VR) to distract patients from pain during physical therapy. SETTING: This study was conducted at the burn care unit of a regional trauma center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients aged 19 to 47 years (average of 21% total body surface area burned) performed range of motion exercises of their injured extremity under an occupational therapist's direction. INTERVENTION: Each patient spent 3 minutes of physical therapy with no distraction and 3 minutes of physical therapy in VR (condition order randomized and counter-balanced). OUTCOME MEASURES: Five visual analogue scale pain scores for each treatment condition served as the dependent variables. RESULTS: All patients reported less pain when distracted with VR, and the magnitude of pain reduction by VR was statistically significant (e.g., time spent thinking about pain during physical therapy dropped from 60 to 14 mm on a 100-mm scale). The results of this study may be examined in more detail at www.hitL.washington.edu/projects/burn/. CONCLUSIONS: Results provided preliminary evidence that VR can function as a strong nonpharmacologic pain reduction technique for adult burn patients during physical therapy and potentially for other painful procedures or pain populations.     

Differences in Pain Patterns for Infected and Noninfected Patients with Burn Injuries

The management of pain is a primary issue in burn care. Patients hospitalized for burn injuries experience severe pain on a daily basis, immediately after the injury and during the healing of the burn wound. Our clinical experience is that the intensity of pain is increased by wound infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate retrospectively whether patients experience increased pain intensity in conjunction with wound infection. A total of 165 patients with burn injuries were included, 60 of whom were diagnosed with infection. The results of this study showed a significant increase in pain intensity in association with infection. An increase in pain is one of the factors to be considered among the many assessments, tests, and treatments for patients with burn injuries.     

A Multimodal Pain Management Strategy for Burn Patients

BackgroundAcute burn pain is difficult to manage, and poorly managed pain can lead to deleterious consequences such as post-traumatic stress disorder, prolonged recovery, chronic pain and long-term dependence on opioids. Understanding the role of nursing in promoting self-efficacy and minimizing opioid use is valuable. It is unknown whether strategic efforts aimed at enhancing patient self-efficacy will improve pain managment and lessen opioid requirements in the adult burn population.AimThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of a multi-modal, interdisciplinary pain management strategy on coping self-efficacy, pain scores, and opioid use in adult burn patients in the acute care setting.MethodA quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design was employed in an American Burn Association (ABA) verified burn center in the Pacific Northwestern United States. Data were collected prospectively for a 6-month period on 44 burn patients. The comparison group received usual care (n = 28), and the intervention received a pain management protocol (n = 16). Coping self-efficacy was measured on admission and at discharge in both groups using the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale. Numeric pain scores and opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents were averaged for each participant. Burn nurse perceptions were gathered via an anonymous electronic survey post data collection in February 2021.ResultsThere were no significant differences in measured coping self-efficacy, pain scores, or opioid use between the intervention and comparison groups. A significant positive correlation was found between length of stay, size of burn, and coping self-efficacy and problem focused self-efficacy. Burn nurses reported increased use of nonpharmacologic adjuncts since protocol implementation.ConclusionNonpharmacologic adjuncts are more likely to be used consistently when protocolized. There is also evidence to support that certain aspects of self-efficacy may be enhanced during acute phase of burn care.     

Pain and paresthesia in patients with healed burns: an exploratory study

The present study was designed to examine the prevalence and characteristics of painful and paresthetic sensations in a group of patients with healed burns. Adult patients who had been hospitalized for burn injuries during a 7-yr period were contacted and given a structured interview that included a series of questions about their present condition. Patients' medical charts were reviewed to obtain relevant demographic and medical information. The results show that abnormal sensations in healed burns are frequently reported as long as several years after the injury. Of 104 patients interviewed 1 yr or more after a burn injury, 82% reported paresthetic sensations such as tingling, stiffness, cold sensations, and numbness; and 35% complained of pain in the scarred tissue. The prevalence of these sensations was not related to age, sex, or etiology of the burns, but was associated with burn size and skin grafting. The theoretical and clinical implications of these results are discussed with particular emphasis on the need to pursue research on the long-term adverse effects of burn injuries.     

Community integration after burn injuries

Evaluation of community integration is a meaningful outcome criterion after major burn injury. The Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) was administered to 463 individuals with major burn injuries. The CIQ results in Total, Home Integration, Social Integration, and Productivity scores. The purposes of this study were to determine change in CIQ scores over time and what burn injury and demographic factors predict CIQ scores. The CIQ scores did not change significantly from 6 to 12 to 24 months postburn injury. Home integration scores were best predicted by sex and living situation; Social Integration scores by marital status; and Productivity scores by functional outcome, burn severity, age, and preburn work factors. The data demonstrate that individuals with burn injuries have significant difficulties with community integration due to burn and nonburn related factors. CIQ scores did not improve over time but improvement may have occurred before the initial 6-month postburn injury follow-up in this study.     

Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients

For daily burn wound care procedures, opioid analgesics alone are often inadequate. Since most burn patients experience severe to excruciating pain during wound care, analgesics that can be used in addition to opioids are needed. This case report provides the first evidence that entering an immersive virtual environment can serve as a powerful adjunctive, nonpharmacologic analgesic. Two patients received virtual reality (VR) to distract them from high levels of pain during wound care. The first was a 16-year-old male with a deep flash burn on his right leg requiring surgery and staple placement. On two occasions, the patient spent some of his wound care in VR, and some playing a video game. On a 100 mm scale, he provided sensory and affective pain ratings, anxiety and subjective estimates of time spent thinking about his pain during the procedure. For the first session of wound care, these scores decreased 80 mm, 80 mm, 58 mm, and 93 mm, respectively, during VR treatment compared with the video game control condition. For the second session involving staple removal, scores also decreased. The second patient was a 17-year-old male with 33.5% total body surface area deep flash burns on his face, neck, back, arms, hands and legs. He had difficulty tolerating wound care pain with traditional opioids alone and showed dramatic drops in pain ratings during VR compared to the video game (e.g. a 47 mm drop in pain intensity during wound care). We contend that VR is a uniquely attention-capturing medium capable of maximizing the amount of attention drawn away from the 'real world', allowing patients to tolerate painful procedures. These preliminary results suggest that immersive VR merits more attention as a potentially viable form of treatment for acute pain.     

The influence of physical and psychosocial factors on accuracy of memory for pain in chronic pain patients

Pain patients' retrospective reports of pain are important to physicians and other health professionals in helping to decide on future treatment plans. Unfortunately patients' memory of pain can be inaccurate and subject to overestimation. This study examined variables which influenced accuracy of remembering pain in 93 chronic pain patients. The patients were initially evaluated by a physician and completed a comprehensive pain questionnaire and an SCL-90. All patients were asked to monitor their pain intensity every hour for 1 week. At the end of this period each patient was asked to estimate their average pain intensity ratings for 4 times during the day for the previous week. These estimations were compared with the actual mean pain ratings. Results showed that most patients tended to overestimate their pain intensity levels. Cervical and low back pain patients were found to be more accurate than headache and abdominal pain patients in remembering their pain. Patients who reported more emotional distress, who had conflicts at home, who were less active and who relied on medication tended to be the most inaccurate in remembering their pain.     

A descriptive summary of New Jersey's 1985 burn population

Data obtained from the New Jersey State Department of Health on the 1985 hospitalized patients with burns and data collected from the National Burn Victim Foundation's standard burn reporting form were analyzed to gather information about the epidemiology of burns. Children (0 to 4 years of age) continue to be the largest percentage of the 0- to 18-year-old age group who sustain burn injuries, and 67% of those injuries are sustained by children under the age of 5. Males accounted for 69% of the total burn population; 58% of admissions were white; 69% of patients were admitted for partial-thickness burns, and 31% were admitted for full-thickness burns; the largest primary payer was third-party payers; and 92% of patients with burns were discharged to home or self-care. Data were also analyzed by examination of selected age groups to determine individual needs of specific groups. An analysis of burn injuries reported to the National Burn Victim Foundation confirmed previous reports that the home is the most likely place for a burn injury to occur and that flame and scald injuries predominate; scald injuries comprise 50% of all sustained burns. Gasoline vapors accounted for 54% of burn injuries caused by flames. The data supported efforts to develop programs that address the needs of the urban child, the 17- to 19-year-old age groups, and the elderly. The information that was collected served to redefine objectives for burn prevention programs.     

Thermal injury in the elderly. The limited need for nursing home care

Although it appears that survival has been increased and hospital stays have been decreased in elderly patients with burn injuries, limited information is available on the functional status of these patients at the time of discharge from the hospital. Because this information is necessary to assess more fully the success or failure of current modes of therapy, we have reviewed the records of 99 surviving patients with burn injuries over the age of 55 years. These patients had a mean age 71.8 years and a mean +/- SD burn size of 8.9% +/- 8.6%, with 36 patients having burns over greater than 10% of body surface area and 14 patients having burns over greater than 20%. The mean hospital stay of these patients was 16.9 days, and 75% of the patients required surgery to heal the burn wounds. Since just five (5%) of the 99 patients required nursing home placement at discharge, it appears that the majority of elderly patients with burn injuries recover sufficiently from the injuries to resume their preinjury life-style.     

Extraterritorial temperature pain threshold abnormalities in subjects with healed thermal injury

Approximately 1.25 million individuals sustain burn injuries annually in the United States. Pain is frequent in patients with burn injuries and is often refractory to pharmacotherapy. We report quantitative sensory data from five subjects who sustained external thermal injuries to their limb(s) 8 weeks to 11 years previously, demonstrating reduced thermal pain thresholds in regions outside the burn injury zone, including contralateral limbs. Warm and cold detection thresholds were not significantly different from controls. These results complement data from animal models that demonstrate that allodynia can develop contralateral to a focal burn injury as a result of changes within the spinal cord and suggest that systemic or central mechanisms contribute to pain after burn injury.