Cytokeratin staining for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Frozen section and intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC(N)) are 2 methods used for intraoperative pathologic assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The SLN evaluation of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) results in a relatively high number of false-negative results using either of these methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added benefits that intraoperative immunohistochemical-cytokeratin staining (I(CK-IHC)) can bring to IIC(N) in the evaluation of SLN in patients with ILC. METHODS: A total of 59 breast cancer patients with ILC underwent an SLN biopsy evaluated by our standard IIC(N) assessment in addition to I(CK-IHC). The results of IIC(N) with I(CK-IHC) were compared with the final histopathologic assessment consisting of standard hematoxylin and eosin staining and additional cytokeratin staining of nodes. RESULTS: Intraoperative evaluation of SLN using IIC(N) and I(CK-IHC) correctly diagnosed the nodal status in 45 of 59 (76.3%) patients. On final histopathologic assessment, 31 of 59 (52.5%) patients were found to have positive nodes. Using I(CK-IHC), 17 of these 31 positive cases (54.8%) were detected.Using IIC(N) alone, without the benefit of I(CK-IHC), only 13 of 31 (41.9%) positive cases were detected intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ILC, I(CK-IHC) staining in addition to IIC(N) improves accuracy over using IIC(N) alone. In this study, I(CK-IHC) staining demonstrated a 12.9% improvement in the detection of SLN metastases in patients with ILC. Cytopathologists should consider employing I(CK-IHC) staining to evaluate the touch-imprint slides of SLN in ILC patients.     

Tumor characteristics predictive of sentinel node metastases in 105 consecutive patients with invasive lobular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Identification of nodal metastases in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is difficult. Sentinel node (SN) biopsy offers a potential advantage. This study reports the feasibility of SN identification and predictors of SN metastases for ILC. METHODS: All cases of ILC undergoing sentinel lymphadenectomy between October 1991 and May 2001 were evaluated. Patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z0010/Z0011 were excluded. Presentation, surgical treatment, tumor characteristics, and prognostic factors were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: SN mapping was performed in 105 patients with 106 cases of ILC. SN identification was 97%, accuracy 100%, and positivity 50% with 45% macrometastases, 16% micrometastases, and 39% immunometastases. There are no axillary recurrences at 43.73 months. Palpable tumor, increasing tumor size, and angiolymphatic invasion are statistically significant for SN-positive status. CONCLUSIONS: SN staging for ILC is feasible and accurate. Receptor status and proliferative indices are not useful markers for metastases. However, large tumor size and presence of angiolymphatic invasion are positive predictors.     

Sentinel lymph node dissection provides axillary control equal to complete axillary node dissection in breast cancer patients with lobular histology and a negative sentinel node

OBJECTIVE: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) presents special challenges to treating physicians because of the diffuse infiltrative growth pattern. As sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is rapidly replacing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer, we sought to evaluate the safety of SLND in providing axillary control in breast cancer patients with lobular histology and a negative sentinel node. METHODS: We identified 239 patients with T1-2,N0,M0 lobular breast cancer from the prospective databases of 2 institutions; all were treated between March 1994 and December 2003. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients had SLND and 37 had SLND followed by ALND. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2/neu status, type of breast surgery, margin status, or nuclear grade. Use of chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy was not significantly different between groups. At a median follow-up of 48 months in the ALND group and 26 months in the SLND group (range 6 to 80 months), none of the 202 patients in the SLND group had experienced an axillary recurrence, while 2 (5.4%) of the 37 patients who underwent ALND had experienced an axillary recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: SLND provided axillary control equivalent to that of ALND for patients with lobular breast cancer. SLND alone appears to be adequate axillary management of patients with lobular breast cancer and a negative sentinel node.     

The Utility of Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Background In breast cancer treatment, intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation is used to identify patients who may potentially benefit from immediate completion of axillary lymph node dissection. Methods Prospectively collected breast cancer registry data identified 516 SLN biopsies between January 2003 and December 2005. Intraoperative evaluation (IE) of the SLNs was performed in 479 axillae. Final pathology by hematoxylin and eosin and, for negative nodes, by immunohistochemical stains was compared with the IE result. The effect of IE and final pathology on surgical treatment was examined. Results The sensitivities for IE of N0(i+) (n = 39), N1mi (n = 41), and N1a–3a (n = 89) metastases were 0%, 5%, and 63%, respectively. The specificity was 99.7%. IE identified 57 (44%) of SLN-positive (N1mi and N1a–3a) axillae, thus resulting in synchronous axillary lymph node dissection for those patients. Reoperation for false-negative IEs (N1mi or N1a–3a with negative IE) occurred in only 27 axillae (39%). Conclusions IE of SLNs has adequate sensitivity and excellent specificity. In addition to allowing patients to benefit from synchronous surgery, IE helped patients to receive care in concordance with recommended practice guidelines. The false-negative IE of SLNs highlights uncertainty with the clinical significance of axillary nodal staging when only small amounts of metastatic disease are identified in the axilla.     

Clinical importance of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes

Introduction

We evaluated the incidence of micrometastasis and nonsentinel lymph node metastasis as well as local and axillary recurrence rates after level I-II axillary lymph node dissection.

Materials and methods

Patients (n = 760) with early-stage breast cancer underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 45 patients (6.0%) with micrometastasis (0.2-2.0 mm) were included in this study. Data concerning tumor, patients’ characteristics and adjuvant treatments were recorded.

Results

The median age was 46 (26-67) years, median breast tumor size was 20 (1-50) mm, and median number of excised sentinel lymph nodes were 2 (1-5). All patients with micrometastasis underwent further level I-II axillary lymph node dissection. Eleven of 45 (24.4%) patients with micrometastasis in their sentinel lymph node biopsy had nonsentinel lymph node metastasis after an axillary lymph node dissection. There was no factor related to nonsentinel lymph node metastasis. Stage migration occurred in 4 of 45 patients (8.8%) due to the detection of micrometastases or macrometastases in nonsentinel lymph nodes.

Discussion

The classical treatment after detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes is further axillary dissection. However, nonrandomized, nonprospective studies with 4-5 years follow up showed 0.6% axillary recurrence without further axillary lymph node dissection, although we still need the results of randomized controlled studies.     

Impact of sentinel lymph node mapping on relative charges in patients with early-stage breast cancer

Background: The introduction of SLNB has allowed accurate staging in early-stage breast carcinomas and has minimized the number of unnecessary ALNDs. Intraoperative frozen-section analysis is a fundamental component of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure. Some patients have positive nodes on frozen-section analysis and thus undergo a conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of the SLNB. A few patients have negative nodes on frozen-section analysis but have subsequent evidence of metastases on final pathologic examination. The purpose of our study was 2-fold: to compare the hospital-related charges of patients undergoing staging by SLNB with those of patients undergoing conventional ALND and to assess whether the different outcomes associated with SLNB adversely affect the charges incurred with this procedure. Methods: Our study group consisted of 100 patients with T1 breast cancer and breast conservation therapy who underwent either SLNB or ALND from July 1, 1997, to June 30, 1998. We identified the first 50 consecutive patients to undergo SLNB during this period. We chose a similar cohort of 50 patients for ALND. Mean hospital-related charges for the SLNB patients were categorized and compared with those for the ALND patients. Results: Results for the two groups were analyzed using a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Charges for the OR and hospital stay were less for the SLNB group (P<.05). Frozen-section analysis in the SLNB group contributed to the significant difference in charges for pathologic evaluation. Overall, the two groups showed no significant difference in total hospital-related charges. Conclusions: When SLNB is used for T1 tumors, a small percentage of patients (10% in our study) will return to the operating room for an ALND. This small percentage does not increase the charges related to SLNB, however, as the reduced stay for most patients offsets this subgroup’s contribution to the total hospital-related charges. Thus, in patients with clinical stage I breast cancer, SLNB does not cause significantly higher hospital-related charges compared with conventional ALND.     

男性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检11例分析

目的 以亚甲蓝注射液为示踪剂检测男性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结,并根据活检及腋窝淋巴结清扫结果评价前哨淋巴结活检在男性乳腺癌治疗中的应用价值.方法 将郑州大学第一附属医院乳腺外科2010年3月-2014年12月收治的男性乳腺癌患者11例入组,临床分期为cT1 ～ T2N0M0.使用亚甲蓝注射液为示踪剂,给予11例患者前哨淋巴结活检,同时给予腋窝淋巴结清扫.结果 11例男性乳腺癌患者,10例检出前哨淋巴结,检出率为90.9％(10/11).前哨淋巴结1～3枚,平均1.8枚.非前哨淋巴结8～14枚,平均10.5枚.1例未检出患者排除分析.10例前哨淋巴结活检成功的患者中6例转移(6/10);前哨淋巴结未转移而非前哨淋巴结转移的患者1例(1/10).本组研究中前哨淋巴结对腋窝淋巴结状况的符合率(准确性)为90％(9/10);灵敏度为100％(6/6)％;准确率为60％(6/10).结论 使用亚甲蓝注射液行前哨淋巴结活检能够准确预测男性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结的转移情况,可作为早期男性乳腺癌评估腋窝分期的可靠手段.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检测的临床研究

目的通过前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)活检,了解前哨淋巴结是否能反映乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移情况,从而决定是否行腋窝淋巴结清扫(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND). 方法 47例T1、T2、T3临床检查腋窝淋巴结无肿大的乳腺癌患者,术前30 min于乳腺肿块周围腺体注射蓝色染料,术中取蓝染的SLN病理检查,术后将病理检查结果与腋窝淋巴结转移情况进行比较分析. 结果 47例中5例未见淋巴结及淋巴管蓝染,其余42例找到腋窝淋巴结608个,阳性18例168个,阴性24例440个;SLN共78个,阳性16例29个,阴性26例49个.SLN的检出率89.4%,准确性95.2% ,特异性100%,敏感性88.9%,假阴性率11.1%,假阳性率0. 结论 SLN活检反应腋窝淋巴结的肿瘤转移状况,可以用于术中确定是否行ALND.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝清扫术前瞻性非随机对照临床研究

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（sentinel lymph node biopsy，SLNB）替代腋淋巴结切除术（axiHary lymph node dissection．ALND）的可行性。方法：联合应用亚甲蓝和^99mTc标记的硫胶体进行SLNB。2001年12月起山东省肿瘤医院乳腺病中心两个治疗组收治的临床T1.2N0M0乳腺癌病人进入本前瞻性非随机对照临床研究。A组病人SLNB后均行ALND。B组病人签署知情同意书，不同意SLNB替代ALND病人（B1组）治疗同A组；同意SLNB替代ALND病人（B2组）依据SLN状况，SLN阴性仅行SLNB，SLN阳性行ALND。结果：2001年12月-2005年6月共入组642例病人，其中A组114例（17．8％），B组528例（82.2％），B1组195例，B2组333例。B2组病人SLN阴性240例仅行SLNB；SLN阳性93例，其中87例接受ALND，另6例SLN镜下微小转移灶者中4例仅行SLNB，2例接受SLNB加区域淋巴结放疗。SLNB替代ALND者各项术后并发症显著低于ALND者（均P〈0．05）。B2组244例仅行SLNB病人中位随访26个月（7-48个月），2例病人发现区域淋巴结复发（0．82％），与ALND腋淋巴结阴性组病人（0％）相比差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。SLN术中冰冻快速病理诊断准确率98．5％，假阴性率5．4％。结论：SLNB可以缩小手术范围、减少病人术后并发症。SLN术中冰冻快速病理诊断具有较高的准确性，能够满足临床需要。     

Selective intraoperative consultation for the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Routine intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer suffers from lack of sensitivity and consumes both time and resources. Failure to perform immediate consultation requires node-positive patients to return for delayed dissection. METHODS: We sought to determine whether selective use of intraoperative pathology consultation (IOC), based on the surgeon's clinical suspicion for metastases, would be accurate, avoid unnecessary consultations, and have a similar rate of delayed axillary dissection. We performed a retrospective chart review of two cohorts of clinically node-negative patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Selective pathology evaluation was performed in the study group and mandatory evaluation in the control group. RESULTS: The axillary basins of 327 patients undergoing routine IOC were compared with those of 91 patients in whom selective IOCs were requested. Twenty-eight consultations (31%) were obtained in the selective group. Selective consultation changed intraoperative management in 11 of 28 patients (39%) compared to 46 of 327 (14%) in the routine group (P = 0.005). The mean SLN metastasis size was 9.6 mm compared to 1.5 mm in patients in whom consultation was deferred (P = 0.003). The need for delayed ALND (17% vs. 14%) was similar in both groups, and was determined by occult metastases that were not detected by either method. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of IOC detects the majority of SLN macrometastases, avoids consultation that does not alter intraoperative management, and is not associated with an increased need for delayed ALND.     

Trends in axillary surgery and clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis

BackgroundThere is a lack of studies examining the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis, especially for the patients with 3–5 node metastases.MethodsBreast cancer patients with 1–5 sentinel node metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2016. Our study presented the trend of axillary surgery and assessed the long-term survival of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for those patients.ResultsOf the 41,996 patients diagnosed with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation included, 34,940 had 1-2 sentinel node metastases and 7056 had 3-5 sentinel node metastases. The percentage of patients undergoing SLNB alone increased from 22.4% in 2000 to 81.0% in 2016 for patients with 1–2 sentinel node metastases, and quadrupled from 5.2% in 2009 to 20.6% in 2016 for those with 3–5 sentinel node metastases. Completion of ALND did not benefit the long-term survival of 1–2 sentinel node metastasis patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, P = 0.539), but improved the long-term survival of 3–5 node metastasis patients (HR = 0.73, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the inferiority of SLNB to ALND in all subgroups of 3–5 sentinel node metastases.ConclusionFor patients with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was an efficient and safe surgical choice for 1–2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3–5 sentinel node metastases. It is worth noting that for patients with 3–5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled after 2009.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结微转移的研究

目的：提高乳腺癌前哨淋巴结（SLN）病理诊断的准确性，为手术彻底切除肿瘤提供依据。方法：应用亚甲蓝生物染色的方法确定60例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳腺癌SLN并活检，44（73．3％）例SLN取材成功。每一枚SLN均进行冰冻病理切片、石蜡病理和角蛋白Keratinl9（CK-19）逆转录聚合酶链反应（RT—PCR）检测。结果：44例SLN冰冻病理切片、石蜡病理切片和CK-19诊断的灵敏度和特异度分别是77．8％和100．0％、88．9％和100．0％、100．0％和82．9％，诊断符合率分别为95．5％、97．7％和86．4％，诊断指数分别为0．778、0．889和0．829。结论：CK-19检测可进一步提高乳腺癌SLN微转移的检出率，提高SLN活检的准确性。但CK-19检测与冰冻病理病理检查联合应用可提高诊断的准确率和临床的可操作性。     

Analysis of sentinel lymph node mapping with immediate pathologic review in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast carcinoma

Background Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are becoming established components of therapy for selected patients with breast carcinoma. However, neoadjuvant therapy has been considered a relative contraindication to SLNM. In an effort to learn whether patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy can undergo accurate SLNM, we evaluated our experience with this technique. Methods From January 1997 to June 2000, SLNM and axillary lymph node dissection were concurrently performed in 35 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Mapping was performed with^99mTc sulfur colloid only in one patient and Lymphazurin dye only in 15 patients, and the two methods were combined in the remainder. Results SLNM successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 30 (86%) patients. Metastatic disease was identified in the sentinel lymph nodes of four patients during surgery. The intraoperative pathologic diagnosis proved to be correct in 19 (79%) of 24 patients. The final pathologic diagnosis of the sentinel lymph node reflected the status of the axillary contents in all patients in whom it was identified. Conclusions These results demonstrate that SLNM can be consistently performed in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, suggesting the utility of this technique in this patient populations. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 15–18, 2001.     

Recurrence rates in breast cancer patients with false-negative intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes

Background

Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in breast cancer patients results in synchronous axillary lymph node dissection. We examined the effect of false-negative SLN biopsy on breast cancer treatments and recurrence rate.

Methods

Patient and tumor characteristics, intraoperative and final SLN biopsy results, and treatments of patients with and without recurrence were compared.

Results

Recurrence rates for patients with true-positive SLN biopsy (9%) were significantly higher than rates for false-negative SLN biopsy patients (2%). Recurrence rates were significantly higher for patients with primary tumors greater than 2 cm, positive lymph nodes greater than 2 mm, and tumors with negative hormone receptors, and varied with treatment extent.

Conclusions

Patients with greater amounts of disease in the breast and axilla required more treatment and had a higher recurrence rate. False-negative SLN evaluation occurred more commonly in patients with less lymph node metastasis and was not associated with an increased recurrence rate.     

Intraoperative identification of suspicious palpable lymph nodes as an integral part of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Purpose Despite the sensitivity and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the number of false negative (FN) results is still relatively high, which has prompted much investigation. We studied the effectiveness of the biopsy of suspicious palpable lymph nodes (LNs) in reducing the number of FN results. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 865 breast cancer patients who underwent successful SLNB at a single institution. After excising the blue-stained or radioactive nodes, all suspicious palpable LNs that were not either blue-stained or radioactive were also excised. Results Sampling of a suspicious palpable LN was done in 342 (39.5%) of the 865 patients. The average number of suspicious palpable nodes was 1.9. The suspicious nodes harbored metastasis in 19 of the 342 patients. Both blue-stained and radioactive metastatic SLNs were found in 8 patients, whereas the palpable nodes were the only ones involved in the other 11. LN involvement was identified solely by biopsy of a suspicious palpable LN in 11 (6.5%) of 170 patients with SLN metastasis (6.5%). Conclusion Biopsy of a suspicious palpable LN should be done as part of SLNB to reduce the number of FN results of SLNs in breast cancer patients.     

Level III axillary lymph nodes involvement in node positive breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy

ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence, associated factors and prognosis of level III node involvement for breast cancer with positive axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsA consecutive series of 521 node positive T_0–2 invasive breast cancer cases were included in this retrospective study. Axillary node metastases were proved by ultrasound guided needle biopsy (NB) if ultrasonographic abnormal node was detected or by sentinel node biopsy (SNB) if no abnormal node was detected. After 4 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT）, axillary lymph nodes dissection included level III lymph nodes were completed for each case.ResultsThe pathologic complete response rate of axillary nodes was 31.1% (90/289) in NB positive subgroup. The incidence of residual positive level III lymph nodes were 9.0% (47/521). Multivariate analysis showed that node NB positivity (OR = 2.212, 95% CI: 1.022–4.787, P = 0.044), clinical tumor size >2 cm before NCT (OR = 2.672, 95% CI: 1.170–6.098, P = 0.020), and primary tumor non-response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.718, 95% CI: 1.232–2.396, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of level III lymph nodes positivity. At median follow-up time of 30 months, the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) rate of level III node positive group was much lower than that of level III negative group (p = 0.011).ConclusionsAbout 9% of node positive T_0–2 breast cancer will have residual positive node in level III region after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Node positivity proved by NB, large tumor size, and primary tumor non-response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are independent predictors of level III lymph nodes positivity.     

Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes by near-infrared fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer

We present a novel method for sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification by fluorescence imaging that provides a high detection rate and a low false-negativity rate. Twenty-five breast cancer patients with tumors less than 3 cm in diameter were enrolled. A combination of indocyanine green and indigo carmine was injected subdermally in the areola. Subcutaneous lymphatic channels draining from the areola to the axilla were immediately showed by fluorescence imaging. After incising the axillary skin near the point of disappearance of the fluorescence, the SLN was dissected under fluorescence guidance. In all patients, the lymphatic channels and SLN were successfully visualized. The mean number of fluorescent SLN and blue-dyed SLN were 5.5 and 2.3. Eight patients were found to have lymph node metastases pathologically. All of them were recognized by fluorescence imaging. This method is feasible and safe for intraoperative detection of SLN allowing real-time observation without any need for training.     

Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during surgery for breast cancer patients. METHODS: From October 2001 to June 2004, SLN biopsy was attempted in 112 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 98 of the patients. A lymph node was considered an SLN when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, had increased radioactivity, or was abnormal by palpation. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of radioactive SLN identified intraoperatively in 47 patients. In 44 of the patients who did not have concordance, there were more SLN identified intraoperatively than were seen on lymphoscintigraphy. In the other 8 patients, there were fewer SLN identified intraoperatively than seen on lymphoscintigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of SLN identified intraoperatively in only 47% of the patients in this study. In a majority of the patients in whom the lymphoscintigraphy was not concordant, the number of SLN identified intraoperatively was underestimated. Thus, although lymphoscintigraphy is beneficial in showing that at least 1 radioactive SLN will be identified intraoperatively, it does not accurately predict the number.     

前哨淋巴结活检术替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术在乳腺癌中的临床应用

目的探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（SLNB）替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术（ALND）在早期乳腺癌患者中的应用价值和安全性。方法对2003年1月到2005年12月期间行前哨淋巴结活检术替代腋窝清扫术的125例患者作为研究组,对同一时期行腋窝清扫术且术后病理淋巴结阳性个数≤1的45例患者作为对照组;比较两组患者术后上肢并发症的发生情况及腋窝复发情况。结果SLNB替代ALND术后上肢麻木、肿胀、疼痛、僵硬、上肢活动受限及肌力减退方面的并发症均明显较ALND少,在随访36．5个月中,仅出现一例腋窝复发。结论前哨淋巴结活检术替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术术后并发症明显减少,腋窝复发率低,是早期乳腺癌患者的安全分期手术。     

亚甲蓝染色法乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术100例分析

目的 探讨分析前哨淋巴结活检术在乳腺癌手术中的应用价值及存在的问题.方法 回顾分析皖南医学院弋矶山医院甲乳外科2012年1月-2013年12月确诊为早期乳腺癌并使用亚甲蓝染色法行前哨淋巴结活检的100例女性患者的病例资料,对前哨淋巴结及腋窝淋巴结的病理结果进行对比分析.结果 100例患者中,92例可见SLN,成功率92％,共检出前哨淋巴结217个,每例1～6枚,平均2.4枚,92例均行ALND.其中,SLN阴性ALN阴性的58例,SLN阴性ALN阳性的4例,SLN阳性ALN阳性的30例,所有患者没有出现过敏反应.SLNB的假阳性率为0,假阴性率为11.8％,灵敏度88.3％,特异度100％,诊断符合率为95.7％.结论 SLNB在早期乳腺癌手术中较传统的ALND有明显的优势,对于SLN阴性的病例可不行ALND.