Specific adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs — A true-to-life monotherapy study

BackgroundIn patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy, adverse effects (AEs) often lead to unfavorable quality of life, impaired adherence, and, eventually, discontinuation of pharmacological treatment. In a true-to-life sample of subjects from our academic epilepsy outpatient clinic, we aimed to identify predictors for overall high AE burden and for specific AEs focusing on patients on monotherapy.MethodsAll patients ≥ 16 years of age with epilepsy for ≥ 12 months were routinely asked to complete the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (LAEP) just before their appointment. Demographic, epilepsy, and treatment variables were derived from our comprehensive outpatient database.ResultsOut of 841 patients, 438 (61% female, mean age: 44.7 ± 17.1 years) on monotherapy were included in this study. Levetiracetam (n = 151), lamotrigine (n = 167), valproic acid (n = 73), or controlled-release carbamazepine (n = 47) were the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Independent predictors for general high AE burden (LAEP score ≥ 45) were duration of epilepsy, lack of 12-month seizure freedom, and partial epilepsy, but none of the four individual AEDs. The most frequent LAEP-defined specific AEs were sleepiness, difficulty concentrating, tiredness, and memory problems. The three most frequent independent predictors for each of the 19 AEs were lack of 12-month seizure freedom (13/19 AEs), individual AED (7/19 AEs), and partial epilepsy (6/19 AEs). Levetiracetam was independently associated with anger/aggression, nervousness/agitation, upset stomach, depression, and sleep disturbance; lamotrigine with nervousness/agitation, upset stomach, and difficulty concentrating; and valproic acid with upset stomach and shaky hands.ConclusionIndividual AEDs independently predicted some specific AEs, but not overall high AE burden. Our findings may help to characterize patients with epilepsy who are at high risk for specific AEs. Dose reduction or change to another AED may reduce LAEP score and potential nonadherence.     

Cross-reactivity of skin rashes with current antiepileptic drugs in Chinese population

ObjectiveDue to less experience with the cross-reactivity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in Chinese population, we surveyed the rates of cross- reactivity of rash among commonly used AEDs in Chinese patients with epilepsy, particularly between the traditional and the new compounds.MethodsWe have retrospectively reviewed the medical records concerning all antiepileptic drug treatment in consecutive Chinese patients with epilepsy in our center. The incidence of AED-related rash was determined in 3793 outpatients, taking at least one of the AEDs-carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), clonazepam (CZP), oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), topiramate (TPM), levetiracetam (LEV) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). We have performed telephone interviews among all patients with AEDs-related rash. We described the clinical characteristics of the 18 patients with cross-reactivity involving the AEDs, and the cross- reactivity pattern for CBZ, PHT, OXC, and LTG.ResultsA total of 3.61% (137/3793) of patients experienced a skin rash to at least one AEDs, of these patients, 73 (53.28%) were female and 64 were males (46.72%). While 18 patients had a rash to two or more AEDs. Of patients who had a rash to CBZ and were also prescribed PHT (n = 17), 52.9% had a rash to PHT (abbreviated as CBZ → PHT: 52.9%); of patients who had a rash to PHT and were also prescribed CBZ (n = 13), rate of rash was 69.2% (i.e., PHT → CBZ: 69.2%). Other results: CBZ → LTG: 25% (n = 16); LTG  → CBZ: 44.4% (n = 9); CBZ → OXC: 40% (n = 10); OXC → CBZ: 66.7% (n = 6); LTG → PHT: 20% (n = 5); PHT → LTG: 16.7% (n = 6); OXC → LTG: 25% (n = 4); LTG → OXC: 33.3% (n = 3); OXC → PHT: 25% (n = 4); PHT → OXC: 16.7% (n = 6). There was a highly significant mutual risk for cross- reactivity for CBZ and PHT, and OXC, and LTG (p < 0.001), mutual risk reached statistical significance for LTG and CBZ (p = 0.01).ConclusionCross-reactivity rates between certain AEDs are high, especially when involving carbamazepine and phenytoin. There were also too few patients with rash to reach definitely conclusions about possible cross-reactivity. Larger numbers of patients would be needed to assess this and the mechanism. Caution should be exercised when prescribing certain AEDs (especially CBZ and PHT, but also OXC, and LTG).     

Impact of planning of pregnancy in women with epilepsy on seizure control during pregnancy and on maternal and neonatal outcomes

PurposeTo investigate whether planning of pregnancy in women with epilepsy affects seizure control during pregnancy and to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in planned and unplanned pregnancies.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 153 pregnant women with epilepsy who were treated at the University of Tsukuba Hospital and Hokkaido University Hospital between 2003 and 2011. Twenty-one pregnancies were excluded due to insufficient data. Data of patients followed by neurologists during their planned pregnancies (planned-pregnancy group, n = 51) were compared to those of patients referred to neurologists after conception for managing epilepsy during pregnancy (unplanned-pregnancy group, n = 81). The treatment profile for epilepsy, seizure control, and maternal and neonatal outcomes in both groups were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsCompared to the unplanned-pregnancy group, the planned-pregnancy group showed a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (80% vs. 61%: planned vs. unplanned, P = 0.049) and those not requiring valproic acid (77% vs. 56%, P = 0.031). Furthermore, the frequency of epileptic seizures (16% vs. 35%, P = 0.018) and changes in antiepileptic drugs (24% vs. 41%, P = 0.042) were significantly lower in the planned-pregnancy group than in the unplanned-pregnancy group. No significant intergroup differences were noted in the obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes, including congenital malformations.ConclusionFor women with epilepsy, planning of pregnancy is associated with good seizure control during pregnancy and less fetal exposure to antiepileptic drugs.     

Fracture risk with use of liver enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs in people with active epilepsy: Cohort study using the General Practice Research Database

PurposeLiver enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (LEI AEDs) have adverse effects on bone metabolism but it is unclear whether this translates into increased fracture risk. This population based cohort study aimed to evaluate whether treatment with LEI AEDs is associated with increased risk of fracture in people with active epilepsy.MethodsThe cohort included patients diagnosed with epilepsy and prescribed AEDs while registered at a GPRD general practice during 1993–2008. The hazard ratio with current use of LEI AEDs for fracture at any site and hip fracture was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThere were 7356 fractures (788 hip fractures) in 63 259 participants. In women, the adjusted hazard ratio with use of LEI AEDs was 1.22 for fracture (95% CI 1.12–1.34; p < 0.001) and 1.49 for hip fracture (1.15–1.94; p = 0.002). In men, the hazard ratio for fracture was 1.09 (0.98–1.20; p = 0.123) and for hip fracture 1.53 (1.10–2.12; p = 0.011). For every 10 000 women treated with LEI AEDs for one year, there could be 48 additional fractures, including 10 additional hip fractures. For every 10 000 men treated with LEI AEDs for one year, there could be 4 additional hip fractures.ConclusionsLEI AEDs may increase the risk of fracture in people with epilepsy. In patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture alternative AED therapy may be appropriate. Further information is urgently needed on the safety of valproate and newer AEDs and on strategies to maintain bone health in people who need to be treated with LEI.     

Evaluation of antiepileptic effect of S-adenosyl methionine and its role in memory impairment in pentylenetetrazole-induced kindling model in rats

BackgroundEpilepsy is the third most common cause of neurological disability worldwide. Despite the introduction of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the past 20 years, the seizures of around 30% of patients with epilepsy remain refractory to available treatment. Also, available AEDs and the disease itself have the potential to exert detrimental effects on cognitive function and therefore compromise patient wellbeing. S-adenosyl methionine has potential antiepileptic and memory-enhancing properties because of its involvement in the transmethylation reaction.ObjectivesThe present study was designed to evaluate the antiepileptic effect of S-adenosyl methionine and its role in memory impairment in the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced kindling model in rats.Materials and methodsThe antiepileptic effect of 2 doses of SAM (50 and 100 mg/kg) was tested by evaluating seizure severity score and seizure latency in the pentylenetetrazole-induced kindling model in rats. At the end of the study, spatial memory was evaluated in an elevated plus maze (EPM) test, and animals were sacrificed for estimation of oxidative stress markers in brain tissue homogenate.ResultsA higher dose of SAM (100 mg/kg) exhibited an increase in seizure latency and a decrease in seizure severity score, suggesting its antiepileptic activity in the PTZ-induced kindling model. Also, the administration of SAM (50 and 100 mg/kg) showed a decrease in transfer latency in the EPM test compared to the disease control group (p < 0.0001). Biochemical analysis of rat brain tissue revealed significantly decreased malondialdehyde (p < 0.0001) and increased glutathione (GSH) (p < 0.0001) in the SAM 100-mg/kg group compared with that in the disease control group.ConclusionThe results demonstrated that S-adenosyl methionine exerts antiepileptic, memory-enhancing, and antioxidant properties in a pentylenetetrazole-induced kindling model of epilepsy.     

Comparison between febrile and afebrile seizures associated with mild rotavirus gastroenteritis

PurposeWe aimed on identifying the differences of febrile and afebrile seizures associated with mild rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in the pediatric population.MethodMedical charts of pediatric patients who had been admitted between July 1999 and June 2011 due to RVGE were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were ultimately divided into three groups; ‘no seizure’ (NS: patients without seizure), ‘febrile seizure’ (FS: patients with fever during seizure), ‘afebrile seizure’ (AFS: patients without fever during seizure). Comparisons between groups were carried out on demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, electroencephalogram findings, brain magnetic resonance imaging findings, antiepileptic treatment, and prognosis.ResultsAmong the 755 subjects who had been admitted due to mild rotavirus enteritis, 696 (90.3%) did not have any seizures, 17 (2.2%) had febrile seizures, 42 (5.5%) had afebrile seizures. The duration of gastrointestinal symptoms before the onset of seizures were significantly shorter in the FS group compared to the AFS group (1.3 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0 days; p < 0.0001). A single seizure attack was significantly higher in the AFS group (3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.0 episodes; p = 0.0003), and the frequency of seizures that were of focal type with or without secondary generalization were significantly higher in the AFS group (33.3% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.0139). All patients among the FS and AFS group had not received further antiepileptic treatment after discharge, and none developed epilepsy during follow up period.ConclusionDespite some differences in seizure characteristics, both febrile and afebrile seizures associated with mild RVGE were mostly benign with a favorable prognosis.     

Epilepsy may be the major risk factor of mental retardation in children with tuberous sclerosis: A retrospective cohort study

Mental retardation (MR) is one of the most common cognitive comorbidities in children with tuberous sclerosis, and there are enormous studies about its risk factors. The genetic difference and the severity of epilepsy are the two main factors, but their weight in the occurrence of MR is still unclear. Two hundred twenty-three patients with tuberous sclerosis who received intelligence assessment, genetic mutation analysis, and the epilepsy severity assessment were included in our study. Genotype–neurocognitive phenotype correlations and epilepsy–neurocognitive phenotype correlations were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis. No statistical significant result was found on genotype–neurocognitive phenotype correlations, which contrasted the previous report. The prevalence of MR was 50.0% for the patients with tuberous sclerosis complex-1 (TSC1) mutation, 54.5% for TSC2 (p = 0.561), 54.7% for patients with protein-truncating (PT) and 50.0% for patients with nontruncating (NT) (p = 0.791), and 54.3% for patients with family history and 53.7% for patients without family history (p = 0.748). Statistical significant results were found on epilepsy–neurocognitive phenotype correlations, both on E-chess score (p = 0.01) and the occurrence of infantile spasms (p = 0.014), which was consistent to the previous study. For children with tuberous sclerosis, instead of genetic factors, epilepsy may play the main role for the presence of mental retardation. Patients with mental retardation tend to have earlier seizure attack, take more AEDs, have more seizure types, and have higher seizure frequency. Among the four cognitive functions in Denver II, social ability and language ability are more vulnerable to be influenced than fine and gross motor ability.     

Vagus nerve stimulation: Outcome and predictors of seizure freedom in long-term follow-up

ObjectivesTo present long-term outcome and to identify predictors of seizure freedom after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).MethodsAll patients who had undergone VNS implantation in the Epilepsy Centre Bethel were retrospectively reviewed. There were 144 patients who had undergone complete presurgical evaluation, including detailed clinical history, magnetic resonance imaging, and long-term video-EEG with ictal and interictal recordings. After implantation, all patients were examined at regular intervals of 4 weeks for 6–9 months. During this period the antiepileptic medication remained constant. All patients included in this study were followed up for a minimum of 2 years.ResultTen patients remained seizure-free for more than 1 year after VNS implantation (6.9%). Seizures improved in 89 patients (61.8%) but no changes were observed in 45 patients (31.3%). The following factors were significant in the univariate analysis: age at implantation, multifocal interictal epileptiform discharges, unilateral interictal epileptiform discharge, cortical dysgenesis, and psychomotor seizure. Stepwise multivariate analysis showed that unilateral interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), P = 0.014, HR = 0.112 (95% CIs, 0.019–0.642), cortical dysgenesis P = 0.007, HR = 0.065 (95% CIs, 0.009–0.481) and younger age at implantation P = 0.026, HR = 7.533 (95% CIs 1.28–44.50) were independent predictors of seizure freedom in the long-term follow-up.ConclusionVNS implantation may render patients with some forms of cortical dysgenesis (parietooccipital polymicrogyria, macrogyria) seizure-free. Patients with unilateral IEDs and earlier implantation achieved the most benefit from VNS.     

What do epileptologists recommend about discontinuing antiepileptic drugs for a second time in children?

ObjectiveThere is a broad consensus that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be withdrawn after two years of seizure freedom for most children with epilepsy. If seizures recur and are, again, completely controlled with AEDs, little is known about discontinuing a second time. We surveyed American and Canadian pediatric epileptologists to understand their current practice.MethodsIn 2014, a survey was sent via e-mail to 193 pediatric epileptologists to learn about AED discontinuation practices in children. The survey asked direct questions about practice and posed five “real-life” cases where the decision to discontinue might be difficult. Participants were identified through membership lists of several US and Canadian epilepsy organizations.ResultsThere were 94 (49%) completed surveys. Sixty-three participants had ≥ 10 years in practice (“more experienced”: mean 23 ± 9 years), and 31 had < 10 years (“less experienced”: mean 6 ± 2). Overall, 62% recommended AED discontinuation for the first time after 2–3 years of seizure freedom, and 61% recommended discontinuation for the second time after 2–3 years. Fifty-six percent of “more experienced” clinicians required a longer seizure-free period prior to a second discontinuation (p < 0.001) compared with 26% of “less experienced” clinicians (p = ns). Overall, most participants suggested an AED taper duration of 2–6 months for the first and second attempts, 52% and 68%, respectively. Both groups wean AEDs more slowly during the second attempt (p < 0.001). There was only 40–60% agreement among participants to discontinue AEDs in four of the cases.ConclusionNearly half (46%) of pediatric epileptologists require a longer seizure-free period the second time they attempt to discontinue AEDs compared with the first attempt and wean down AEDs somewhat more slowly. Although a variety of factors influence decision-making, there was a high level of disagreement to discontinue AEDs a second time in “real-life” cases.     

Duration of focal complex,secondarily generalized tonic–clonic,and primarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures — A video-EEG analysis

IntroductionIdentifying seizures with prolonged duration during video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring is of importance to inform clinicians when to start emergency treatment of seizures to prevent status epilepticus. The aims of this study were to assess the clinical and EEG seizure duration (SD) in consecutive patients with epilepsy who underwent prolonged video-EEG monitoring and to identify a seizure type-dependent time point to start emergency treatment based on the likelihood that seizures will not stop spontaneously. Furthermore, we sought to determine predictors of SD and explored the relationship between antiepileptic drug (AED) serum levels and SD.Material and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1796 seizures in 200 patients undergoing video-EEG monitoring between January 2006 and March 2008.ResultsFocal simple seizures lasted significantly shorter (clinical SD: 28 s, EEG SD: 42 s) compared with focal complex seizures (clinical SD: 64 s, EEG SD: 62 s), and both seizure types lasted significantly shorter compared with secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs; clinical SD: 90 s, EEG SD: 96 s). There was no difference between the duration of the convulsive phase of primary GTCSs (defined as nonfocal) and that of secondarily GTCSs (each 65 s). Cumulative clinical SD (99%) was 7 min in focal complex seizures and 11 min in focal simple seizures. Mixed linear regression model demonstrated that history of status epilepticus (P = 0.034), temporal lobe seizure onset (P = 0.040), and MRI lesions (P = 0.013) were significantly associated with logarithmic EEG SD in focal epilepsies recorded with scalp electrodes. We found significant negative correlations between the AED serum level and the EEG SD in patients treated with monotherapy: carbamazepine (P < 0.001), levetiracetam (P = 0.001), oxcarbazepine (P = 0.001), and valproic acid (P = 0.038) but not with lamotrigine monotherapy and EEG SD.DiscussionBased on the results of this study, we propose 2 min of convulsive seizure activity (irrespective of focal or generalized onset) as a prolonged seizure, which could serve as a time point to consider treatment to prevent status epilepticus. In focal complex seizures, we suggest an upper limit of 7 min, and in focal simple seizures 11 min, as definition of prolonged seizures. History of status epilepticus, temporal seizure onset, and lesional MRI findings are factors associated with significantly longer SD. Negative correlations of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and valproic acid serum levels and SD suggest a prolonging effect on seizures during withdrawal of these AEDs during video-EEG monitoring sessions.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “Status Epilepticus”.     

Comparison of risk factors for pediatric convulsive status epilepticus when defined as seizures ≥5 min versus seizures ≥30 min

PurposeTo identify risk factors (RF) of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (SE) and to determine whether defining SE as seizures ≥5 min (SE₅) or seizures ≥30 min (SE₃₀) would modify the risk factors identified.MethodsRetrospective case–control study. We included patients 1 month to 21 years of age at the time of convulsive SE. We compared the characteristics of patients with SE (cases) versus those without SE (controls) using two different seizure duration thresholds: 5 min and 30 min.Results1062 patients (54% males) were enrolled. The median (p₂₅–p₇₅) age at the episode was 6.4 (2.8–11.8) years. 444 (41.8%) patients had SE₅ and 149 (14%) patients had SE₃₀. On univariate analysis, risk factors for SE were not markedly different when considering a 5 or 30 min threshold. Compared to their respective controls patients with both SE₅ and SE₃₀ were younger at the age of seizure onset and at the age of SE, were on more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at baseline, had a higher rate of changes in AEDs in the three months prior to the episode, were more likely to have developmental delay at baseline, and a higher mortality rate. A higher baseline seizure frequency, and a higher increase in seizure frequency prior to the index episode were seen only in SE₅.ConclusionThis series identifies RF which predict convulsive SE in pediatric patients. These RF are similar when considering a 5 min or a 30 min threshold for the definition of SE.     

Prospective audits with newer antiepileptic drugs in focal epilepsy: Insights into population responses?

Despite the availability of a wide range of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), there is little evidence that their introduction has substantially altered outcomes. This paper reviews data from 5 consecutive prospective audits with new AEDs using similar methodology. Prospective audits with topiramate (TPM; n = 135), levetiracetam (LEV; n = 136), zonisamide (ZNS; n = 141), pregabalin (PGB; n = 135), and lacosamide (LCM; n = 160) were undertaken in treated patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Follow-up continued until one of four endpoints was reached: seizure freedom for ≥ 6 months on unchanged dosing; ≥ 50% reduction (responder) in seizure frequency on the highest tolerated dose compared with baseline; < 50% seizure frequency reduction (marginal response) compared with baseline in patients wishing to continue treatment with the new AED; or withdrawal due to lack of efficacy, side effects, or both. A greater proportion of seizure-free patients occurred with LEV (23.5%), LCM (21.9%), and TPM (20.7%) than with ZNS (12.8%) and PGB (10.4%). A higher percentage discontinued treatment with ZNS (41.8%) and PGB (50.4%) than with LEV (32.4%), TPM (31.1%), and LCM (22.5%). Most seizure-free patients responded to the new agent as first or second add-on (TPM 96%; LEV 97%; ZNS 89%; PGB 86%; LCM 97%) often at modest or moderate dosing (TPM 68%, ≤ 200 mg/day; LEV 63%, ≤ 1000 mg/day; ZNS 61%, ≤ 100 mg/day; PGB 86%, ≤ 300 mg/day; LCM 74%, ≤ 200 mg/day). With < 10% of patients discontinuing all AEDs due to lack of efficacy, tolerability was the major factor influencing the number of patients remaining on treatment. Lacosamide was the best (77% patients continued treatment), while PGB was the worst (50% continued treatment) tolerated AED. Overall, seizure freedom was achieved in < 25% of patients in each audit, mainly as a first or second add-on, with best tolerated AEDs producing a higher number of good outcomes. Seizures in very few patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy task force, responded to any of the 5 newer AEDs. These data support the suggestion that the introduction of modern agents has not importantly impacted the outcomes in refractory epilepsy.     

Intracerebral hemorrhage in young from a tertiary neurology center in North India

ObjectiveThere is paucity of information on the etiology and predictors of outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in young which may have regional and ethnic differences. In this study, we report the etiology and predictors of outcome of ICH in young patients from North India.Methods404 patients with ICH in young (16–50 years) were retrospectively reviewed who were admitted in neurology service of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India. The data were retrieved from the computerized hospital information service. The information about the demography, risk factors, clinical status, laboratory findings, CT/MRI features and angiography (CT, MRI or digital substraction) were noted. The etiology of ICH was ascertained based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings. Outcome at 1 month was assessed using Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 41.6 years and 23.8% were females. Hypertension (57.2%), hypocholesterolemia (33.7%), alcohol (15.8%) and anticoagulant (3.5%) were the important risk factors. The etiology of ICH was hypertension in 320 (79.2%), vascular malformation in 17 (4.2%), coagulopathy in 16 (4%), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) in 9 (2.2%), thrombocytopenia in 3 (0.7%), vasculitis in 2 (0.5%) and cryptogenic in 37 (9.2%) patients. The patients with cryptogenic ICH were younger, had better Glasgow coma scale (GCS) on admission and good outcome compared those with known etiology. The most common location of ICH was basal ganglion and thalamus (71.3%). 102 (25%) patients died, 161 (39.9%) had poor and 141 (34.9%) had good outcome. Hypertensive ICH patients had frequent death or disability (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, low GCS score (P < 0.001), large ICH (P = 0.01) and high leukocyte count on admission (P = 0.03) were significantly related to the 1 month mortality.ConclusionHypertension is the commonest cause of ICH in young Indian adults and its outcome is related to volume of ICH, GCS score and admission leukocyte count.     

Epidemiology of uncontrolled epilepsy in the Al-Kharga District,New Valley,Egypt

BackgroundDespite advances in treating epilepsy, uncontrolled epilepsy continues to be a major clinical problem. Therefore, this work aimed to study the epidemiology of uncontrolled epilepsy in Al-Kharga District, New Valley.MethodsThis study was carried out in 3 stages via door-to-door screening of the total population (62,583 persons). All suspected cases of epilepsy were subjected to case ascertainment, conventional ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG), and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Patients who had been receiving suitable anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) over the previous 6 months and were having active seizures were considered uncontrolled, according to Ohtsuka et al.²³ The patients underwent serum AED level estimation, video EEG monitoring, and brain MRIs. Fifty age- and gender-matched patients with controlled epilepsy were chosen for statistical analysis and compared with true intractable patients.ResultsA total of 437 patients with epilepsy were identified, 30.7% of whom (n = 134/437) were uncontrolled, with a prevalence of 2.1/1000. A total of 52.2% of uncontrolled patients (n = 70/134) were inappropriately treated, while 47.8% (n = 64/134) were compliant with appropriate treatments. Video monitoring EEG of compliant uncontrolled patients demonstrated that 78.1% patients (n = 50/64) had definite epilepsy, while 21.9% (n = 14/64) had psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). A logistic regression analysis revealed that status epilepticus, focal seizures, and mixed seizure types were risk factors for intractability.     

Is lamotrigine a significant human teratogen? Observations from the Australian Pregnancy Register

Lamotrigine (LTG) is increasingly being prescribed in pregnancy for women with epilepsy in place of valproate (VPA), because of the teratogenic risks associated with the latter. It is therefore important to know the teratogenic hazard associated with LTG, relative to VPA and to other commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Data from the Australian Register of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pregnancy was examined to determine the incidence of teratogenicity determined 1 year from completion of pregnancy in women who took AEDs in monotherapy during pregnancy. Compared with a 3.4% malformation incidence in women who took no AEDs (N = 118), the incidences for LTG (N = 243), carbamazepine (CBZ) (N = 302) and VPA (N = 224) were, respectively, 4.9%, 5.3% and 15.2%, the latter statistically significantly greater than the risk for no AED therapy in pregnant women with epilepsy. Logistic regression analysis showed no tendency for foetal hazard to increase with increasing LTG dose in pregnancy, unlike the situation for VPA. However, seizure control in pregnancy tended to be not as good in the women taking LTG compared with those taking VPA, though the data examined were not adequate to permit definite conclusions regarding this matter. We conclude that LTG monotherapy in pregnancy is safer than valproate monotherapy from the point of view of foetal malformations, and no more hazardous in this regard than therapy with other commonly used AEDs.     

Long-term effect of antiepileptic drug switch on serum lipids and C-reactive protein

BackgroundPrior studies have shown that switching patients from inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to lamotrigine, levetiracetam, or topiramate reduces serum lipids and C-reactive protein (CRP). These studies were all of short duration, and some drugs, such as zonisamide, have not been investigated.MethodsWe recruited 41 patients taking phenytoin or carbamazepine who were being switched to zonisamide, lamotrigine, or levetiracetam. We measured serum lipids and CRP before the switch, > 6 weeks after, and > 6 months after. An untreated control group (n = 14) underwent similar measurement. We combined these data with those of our previous investigation (n = 34 patients and 16 controls) of a very similar design.ResultsThere were no differences in outcome measures between the two inducing AEDs nor among the three noninducing AEDs. Total cholesterol (TC), atherogenic lipids, and CRP were higher under inducer treatment than in controls. All measures were elevated under inducer treatment relative to noninducer treatment, including TC (24 mg/dL higher, 95% CI: 17.5–29.9, p < 0.001) and CRP (72% higher, 95% CI: 41%–111%, p < 0.001). The difference between drug treatments was clinically meaningful for atherogenic lipids (16%, 95% CI: 11%–20%, p < 0.001) but small for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (5%, 95% CI: 1%–9%, p < 0.05). All measures were stable between 6 weeks and 6 months after drug switch.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that switching from inducing to noninducing AEDs produces an enduring reduction in serum lipids and CRP. These results provide further evidence that inducing AEDs may be associated with elevated vascular disease risk. These are the first vascular risk marker data in patients taking zonisamide, which shows a profile similar to that of other noninducing AEDs.     

Distinguishing between patients with pure psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and those with comorbid epilepsy by means of clinical data

Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) often have additional epileptic seizures (ESs). Distinguishing between those with ESs and those without ESs is difficult but mandatory. We hypothesize that these two patient groups differ in clinical data, which might be useful for establishing diagnosis. All patients with PNESs (n = 114) from the Bethel Epilepsy Centre treated between 1/11/2010 and 1/11/2011 were included. Thirty-six percent had additional epilepsy. In contrast, 84 of the 114 patients with PNESs took antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (AED treatment: patients with PNESs = 44/73, patients with PNESs + ESs = 40/41), most of them (65.5%) as polytherapy. Significant differences between both groups were as follows: patients with PNESs were older at disease onset, had a shorter duration from onset to inpatient visit, were less frequently on AEDs, were less frequently on antiepileptic polytherapy, and had a normal EEG compared with patients with PNESs + ESs. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression revealed age at seizure onset, number of AEDs, and difference between number of AEDs and psychiatric drugs as significant predictors of patients with ESs in PNESs (Nagelkerke's r² = 0.59). Therefore, clinical data proved to be useful in the diagnostic process.     

Antiepileptic drug prescribing patterns in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans with epilepsy

ObjectiveWe examined patterns of antiepileptic drug (AED) use in a cohort of Iraq/Afghanistan war veterans (IAVs) who were previously identified as having epilepsy. We hypothesized that clinicians would be more likely to prescribe newer AEDs and would select specific AEDs to treat seizures based on patient characteristics including gender and comorbidities.MethodsFrom the cohort of IAVs previously identified with epilepsy between fiscal years 2009 and 2010, we selected those who received AEDs from the Veterans Health Administration in FY2010. Regimens were classified as monotherapy or polytherapy, and specific AED use was examine overall and by gender. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations of age; gender; race/ethnicity; medical, psychiatric, and neurological comorbidities; and receipt of neurology specialty care associated with the six most commonly used AEDs.ResultsAmong 256,284 IAVs, 2123 met inclusion criteria (mean age: 33 years; 89% men). Seventy-two percent (n = 1526) received monotherapy, most commonly valproate (N = 425) and levetiracetam (n = 347). Sixty-one percent of those on monotherapy received a newer AED (levetiracetam, topiramate, lamotrigine, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine). Although fewer women than men received valproate, nearly 90% (N = 45) were of reproductive age (≤ 45 years). Antiepileptic drug prescribing patterns were associated with posttraumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, cerebrovascular disease, dementia/cognitive impairment, headache, and receipt of neurological specialty care (all p < 0.01).SignificanceIn this cohort of veterans with epilepsy, most received AED monotherapy and newer AEDs. Prescribing patterns were different for men and women. The patterns observed between AEDs and neurological/psychiatric comorbidities suggest that clinicians are practicing rational prescribing.     

Efficacy and tolerability of the first antiepileptic drug in children with newly diagnosed idiopathic epilepsy

PurposeLimited data are available for the effectiveness of the antiepileptic drugs in children in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the first prescribed old and new antiepileptic drugs in children with newly diagnosed idiopathic epilepsy during a 12-month period.MethodA total of 289 children (141 females and 148 males) who received phenobarbital (n = 33), valproate (n = 142), carbamazepine (n = 42), oxcarbazepine (n = 38), or levetiracetam (n = 34) as the first-line treatment, were enrolled in the study. Seizure control and the occurrence of adverse events were assessed during a treatment period of 12 months.ResultsOverall, 245 (84.8%) patients remained seizure-free during the study period. The rate of seizure control did not differ significantly between the drug groups (p = 0.099). Forty-four (15.2%) patients including 1 (3.0%) treated with phenobarbital, 22 (15.5%) with valproate, 7 (16.7%) with carbamazepine, 10 (26.3%) with oxcarbazepine, and 4 (11.8%) with levetiracetam had treatment failure. There was no significant difference between seizure-free and failure groups in terms of age, gender, seizure type, and drugs used. Overall, 80 (27.7%) patients had adverse events, of those the most common ones were behavioral problems, nausea and/or vomiting, weight gain, and learning difficulties. The reasons for treatment failures were lack of seizure control in 29 (10.0%) patients and intolerable adverse events in 15 (5.2%) patients.ConclusionIt appears that old (phenobarbital, valproate and carbamazepine) and new antiepileptic drugs (oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam) have similar efficacy and tolerability profiles.Institutional ethic number is 28.3.2013/14.