Phase II study of biweekly S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and pharmacogenetic analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in a biweekly schedule as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer and the association between genetic polymorphisms and treatment outcomes.

Methods

Eligibility included age 18?C75?years, at least one measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy except adjuvant chemotherapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS) 0?C2. S-1 40?mg/m² b.i.d. on days 1?C7 with 85?mg/m² of oxaliplatin on day 1 was repeated every 2?weeks. Genomic DNA from whole blood was analyzed for 15 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 8 genes.

Results

Fifty-two patients (median age 63?years, range 37?C74) were enrolled: 37 men and 15 women; 44 with a PS of 0 and 8 with a PS of 1; and 41 with initially metastatic cancer and 11 with relapsed disease. Among 51 evaluable patients, objective response rate was 47.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.9?C61.2]. Median follow-up duration was 17.1?months (range 3.9?C28.2?months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4?months (95% CI 4.8?C8.1), and median overall survival had not been reached yet. Reported grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (7.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.8%), sensory neuropathy (7.7%) and diarrhea (1.9%). There was no grade 4 toxicity or neutropenic fever. Patients with A/G or G/G genotype in GSTP1 Ile105Val SNP had longer PFS than patients with A/A (median 8.3 vs. 6.1?months, P?=?0.04).

Conclusions

Biweekly S-1 with oxaliplatin is effective and has improved tolerability and convenience compared to other fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin combinations. GSTP1 Ile105Val SNP is associated with treatment outcomes.     

Phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase expression associated with prognosis for patients with gastric cancer treated with cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy

Purpose

The present study analyzed the expression of phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK), Fyn kinase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1 (PDK-1) and their impact on the survival of patients with resected gastric cancer who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Korean patients with stage II–IV (M0) gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent a gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection and received a combination regimen of cisplatin and S-1 were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry was carried out to determine the expression of pAMPK, Fyn kinase, and PDK-1 in operative specimens of gastric cancer. The expression was divided into two groups according to the intensity score (negative: 0 or 1+ and positive: 2+ or 3+).

Results

From January 2006 to July 2010, 73 tumor samples obtained from 74 patients were analyzed. Forty patients were included in the pAMPK-positive group, while 33 patients were included in the pAMPK-negative group. Meanwhile, positive Fyn kinase expression was observed in only 10 patients (13.7?%), and there was no or very weak PDK-1 staining. The clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between the two groups according to the expression of pAMPK. With a median follow-up duration of 26.5?months (2.6–73.2), the estimated 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival rates were 55.0 and 78.4?%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, Lauren classification, and stage, the pAMPK-negative group was significantly associated with improved RFS (Hazard ratio?=?0.459, 95?% CI 0.109–0.711, P?=?0.043).

Conclusion

A low expression of pAMPK was found to be correlated with better RFS in patients with resected gastric cancer treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.     

Phase II study of FOLFIRI regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin.

Methods

The FOLFIRI regimen consisted of intravenous infusion of irinotecan 180?mg/m² on day 1 plus leucovorin (LV) 400?mg/m² on day 1 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400?mg/m² bolus on day 1 plus 46-hour intravenous infusion of 5-FU 2,400?mg/m², every 2?weeks as one cycle. The main selection criterion for this study was the advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin.

Results

Of the 57 evaluable patients for efficacy, 4 (7.5%) had a partial response, 36 (67.9%) had stable disease, and 13 (24.5%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 4.8?months (95% CI 3.9?C5.7?months), and median overall survival was 7.8?months (95% CI 13.1?C16.5?months). Safety analysis was based on the data of 57 evaluable patients. The most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia 16 (27.8%), nausea/vomiting 7 (12.3%), and diarrhea 1 (1.8%).

Conclusion

FOLFIRI regimen is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin in Chinese population.     

Combination chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1: multi-institutional retrospective analysis

Background

It is unclear whether S-1 plus cisplatin is effective for patients with recurrent gastric cancer after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients whose gastric cancer recurred after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

Results

In the 52 patients evaluated, the median duration of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy was 8.1?months, and the median recurrence-free interval (RFI) since the last administration of adjuvant S-1 was 6.4?months. Among the 36 patients with measurable lesions, 7 achieved a complete or partial response, and 13 were evaluated as having stable disease, for an overall response rate of 19.4% and a disease control rate of 55.6%. For all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8?months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.2?months. Compared with patients with an RFI of <6?months (n?=?25), patients with an RFI of ≥6?months (n?=?27) had a significantly higher response rate (5.0 vs. 37.5%, respectively), longer PFS (2.3 vs. 6.2?months, respectively), and longer overall survival (7.3 vs. 16.6?months, respectively). According to a multivariate Cox model including performance status (PS) and reason for discontinuation of adjuvant S-1, an RFI of 6?months was still significantly associated with PFS and OS.

Conclusions

S-1 plus cisplatin is effective for patients with gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy, especially for those with an RFI of ≥6?months.     

Cetuximab in the first-line treatment of K-ras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the choice and schedule of fluoropyrimidine matters

Background

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, inconsistently improves response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients with K-ras wild-type (WT) tumors.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of four trials where K-ras WT Pts received a fluoropyrimidine (infusional vs. bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs. capecitabine) and oxaliplatin or irinotecan with and without cetuximab (CRYSTAL, OPUS, COIN and NORDIC VII trials) and two trials, where K-ras WT and mutant patients received cetuximab and a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine in a German AIO study and infusional 5-FU in the CECOG study) with oxaliplatin versus irinotecan. We sought to determine whether the choice of fluoropyrimidine or of oxaliplatin versus irinotecan affects the response to cetuximab. Meta-analysis was performed in the context of a mixed effects model with a random effect for each study.

Results

Only patients treated with infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy derived benefit from cetuximab. Relative to infusional 5-FU, patients treated with capecitabine/bolus 5-FU-based doublet chemotherapy had a 42?% (95?% CI 21?C58?%; p?p?p?=?0.012) increase, respectively, in risk of progression and death. The choice of oxaliplatin or irinotecan did not affect benefit from cetuximab.

Conclusion

The lack of benefit for cetuximab with capecitabine/bolus 5-FU regimens is unexpected. Cetuximab should only be used with infusional 5-FU regimens in the first-line treatment of K-ras WT colorectal cancer patients. Further study is urgently needed to elucidate the basis of this observation.     

ERCC1 predicts outcome in patients with gastric cancer treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy is gaining an increasing role in resectable gastric cancer. Customizing chemotherapy on the basis of chemosensitivity may improve outcome, and putative predictive molecular markers have been mostly evaluated in Asian patients. We profiled key DNA and damage signaling factors and correlated them with outcome, in a European cohort.

Methods

Formalin-fixed tumor samples obtained from surgical specimens of patients treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for gastric cancer were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to analyze excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression, and p53 mutations were detected with direct sequencing.

Results

Among the 68 patient recruited, the median age was 69 (range 30–74), and UICC stage was III in 44 patients (65 %). With a median follow-up of 40.5 months, disease-free and overall survival were 18.0 (95 % CI 13.4–22.76) and 56 months (95 % CI 44.87–67.13), respectively. ERCC1 score was 0 in 14 out 67 (21 %) cases, 1 in 19 (28 %), 2 in 20 (30 %) and 3 in 14 cases (21 %). Longer overall survival (p = 0.04) was found in patients categorized as ERCC1 negative by IHC according to median score. TS score was 0 in 16 out 67 (24 %) cases, 1 in 27 (40 %), 2 in 16 (24 %) and 3 in 8 cases (12 %). Mutations of p53 were found in 21 out 66 (32 %) cases. Neither TS nor p53 were found to correlate with outcome.

Conclusion

Excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 by IHC might predict patients more likely to benefit from adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in curatively resected gastric cancer. In patients exhibiting ERCC1 positive tumors, alternative regimens should be evaluated.     

Palliative oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy after exposure to oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting for colon cancer

Background

Little is known regarding the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer patients who have already received adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 22 consecutive patients who developed recurrence after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and received another course of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. The main endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 635 patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer at the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 2006 to 2011. A total of 176 patients recurred, 22 (12.5%) of whom were re-exposed to oxaliplatin in the metastatic scenario. Oxaliplatin in combination with fluoropyrimidine was given as first, second and third line in in 3 (13.6%), 14 (63.6%), and 5 (22.7%) patients respectively. Median time from the last cycle of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy to the first cycle of palliative oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was 44.3 months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.4-5.1) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 5.3-14.6), respectively. There was no difference in PFS for patients re-exposed to oxaliplatin less than 36 months compared to longer (3.6 versus 3.1 months, P=0.793, HR =0.88).

Conclusions

In this population-based study, only a small proportion of pts who recurred after oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy received oxaliplatin in the metastatic setting. Re-exposure of oxaliplatin in combination with fluoropyrimidine is associated with only modest PFS benefit. Larger studies evaluating the role of oxaliplatin re-exposure are needed.     

Phase II study of short-course capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) followed by maintenance capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: XelQuali study

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and quality of life of a short course of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) followed by single-agent capecitabine in patients with previously untreated, inoperable, metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130?mg/m² on d1 plus oral capecitabine 1,000?mg/m² twice daily (bid) on d1?C14 every 21?days for four cycles. Patients achieving stable disease (SD) or better than received capecitabine 1,250?mg/m² bid on d1?C14 every 21?days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Overall, 21/45 (47%) of patients responded to the initial XELOX chemotherapy whilst SD or better was documented in 76%. Median PFS was 6.7 (95% CI 5.7?C9.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.5 (95% CI 13.1?C28.1) months. In the 34 patients who then received capecitabine maintenance therapy, the median PFS was 8.1 (95% CI 6.2?C11.8) months and median OS was 23.1 (95% CI 17.8?C28.5) months. A marked reduction in the vast majority of all grades of adverse event occurred on switching from initial XELOX to maintenance capecitabine chemotherapy including grades 1?C2 (77 vs. 47%) and grade 3 (7 vs. 3%) neuropathy, diarrhoea and lethargy.

Conclusions

Short-course XELOX followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy provides an active and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. A median OS of more than 20?months is promising and by limiting the number of oxaliplatin infusions, this approach minimises the risk of unwanted cumulative neurotoxicity, is cheaper and more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers.     

Therapie des fortgeschrittenen Magenkarzinoms

Context

In the metastatic setting treatment goals are palliative. Chemotherapy can prolong survival, improve symptoms and can help to maintain a better quality of life.

Objective

The aim of this study was to discuss the new treatment options and the existing results in advanced gastric cancer.

Material and methods

Treatment recommendations are given in consideration of updated literature (Pubmed, MEDLINE and manual search).

Results

Combination chemotherapy including a platinum compound and a fluoropyrimidine are regarded as the gold standard of care. Oxaliplatin can substitute for cisplatin while capecitabine or S1 can substitute for infusional 5-FU. In elderly patients oxaliplatin has advantages compared with cisplatin. Triplet combinations containing a platinum salt, a fluoropyrimidine and a taxane or (with less evidence) an anthracycline are more efficacious but also expose patients to more side effects. Second line chemotherapy is indicated for patients who progress during or after first line chemotherapy. The monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has been shown to prolong survival when combined with cisplatin and 5-FU or capecitabine in gastric cancer patients with overexpression of the growth factor HER2.

Conclusion

The therapeutic options for advanced gastric cancer have significantly increased. Presently, there are several effective treatment regimens available.     

A phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) for patients with advanced gastric cancer with early relapse after S-1 adjuvant therapy: XParTS-I trial

Backgrounds

In Japan, standard regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) include S-1 chemotherapy. The standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine alone is platinum-based chemotherapy, while the standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum is second-line chemotherapy. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) treatment for AGC patients who relapse within 6 months after S-1-based therapy, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial (NCT01412294).

Methods

HER2-negative gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy including S-1 for more than 12 weeks and relapsed within 6 months were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m² bid for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, time to treatment failure, overall response rate (ORR) and safety.

Results

Forty patients (median age 64) were enrolled; of those, 37 (92.5%) received adjuvant S-1 monotherapy. Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.6–5.1), which was longer than the 2-month protocol-specified threshold (p < 0.001). Median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.0–17.7) and ORR was 8/30 (26.7%) (95% CI 14.2–44.4). Most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (23%), anemia (18%), elevated serum creatinine (18%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (7.5%), and anorexia (7.5%).

Conclusions

XP was safe and effective in patients with early relapse after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancers. XP may be a good option for the treatment of patients after early failure after adjuvant S-1.

Trial registration

NCT01412294.

     

Predictive factors for the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy as salvage therapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients

Purpose

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients previously treated with chemotherapy and to investigate potential predictors of treatment efficacy in those patients.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with MGC were included in this study. Cetuximab was delivered, often combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Thirty patients were analyzed for K-ras mutations via direct sequencing of the tumor DNA.

Results

Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of three previous lines of palliative chemotherapy (56% of the patients were refractory to all of the following drugs: fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) and 53% of the patients displayed poor performance status. Of 28 response-assessable patients, the overall response rate to cetuximab plus chemotherapy was 3.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0–10.5%] and the disease control rate was 28.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.7 months (95% CI 1.3–2.1 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.4–5.0 months). Multivariate analyses revealed that skin rash and performance status were significantly associated with PFS and OS. The presence of a K-ras mutation (13.3%) was not associated with either PFS or OS.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that MGC patients with good performance status and skin rash benefit most from salvage cetuximab combined with chemotherapy, even in heavily pretreated status.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable biliary cancer including gall bladder cancer: a Korean Cancer Study Group phase II trial

Purpose

Chemotherapy represents a palliative treatment, with poor response rates and a median survival of less than 6 months in patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with BTCs including gall bladder cancer.

Methods

We carried out a nationwide multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GEMOX as first-line therapy in patients with advanced BTCs. Eligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic BTCs received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² (day 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² (day 1), every 3 weeks.

Results

Fifty-three patients were evaluated, 60% had cholangiocarcinoma and the remaining 40% gall bladder cancer; the objective response rate was 18.9% (10/53 patients including 1 Complete response) [14.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.4–25.7%] in the treated population. Stable disease were observed in 27/53 (50.9%) patients, disease control rate was achieved in 69.8% of all patients. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (3.1–6.5, 95% CI) and median overall survival was 8.3 months (5.8–10.8, 95% CI). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (33.9% of patients) and thrombocytopenia (7.6%).

Conclusions

The GEMOX regimen demonstrated a modest antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with advanced BTCs.     

A retrospective study of S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer (PC).

Methods

Consecutive patients with advanced PC refractory to gemcitabine who were treated with oral S-1 (80 mg/m²) on days 1–14 and intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m²) on day 1 every 3 weeks were studied retrospectively. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

Between March 2009 and October 2011, 30 patients were treated with SOX, with a median of two courses (range 1–8). The ORR and DCR were 10.0 and 50.0 %, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 3.4 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.3–5.3) and 5.0 months (95 % CI 3.4–7.4), respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.6 and 9.1 months in patients receiving S-1 and oxaliplatin as a second-line treatment. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (10.0 %), anemia (3.3 %), and diarrhea (6.7 %).

Conclusions

SOX was well tolerated and moderately effective in patients with refractory PC.     

Three-week combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study with 159 patients

Background

Doses and schedules of the combination of S-1 and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have not been standardized. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 3-week schedule of S-1 and cisplatin in patients with AGC, as well as assessing factors prognostic of patient outcomes.

Methods

A total of 159 patients with AGC were treated with S-1 (40?mg/m² bid on days?1–14) and cisplatin (60?mg/m² IV on day?1) between January 2004 and December 2008.

Results

Median follow-up duration was 20.0?months (range, 11.4–48.5?months), during which time 129 patients (81.1%) died. Patients received a median 6 cycles of chemotherapy (range, 1–19 cycles). Among the 59 patients with measurable disease, 1 achieved a complete response (1.7%) and 24 (40.7%) had partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 42.4% (95% CI, 23.0–61.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8?months (95% CI, 4.8–6.9?months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.3?months (95% CI, 9.6–13.0?months). Multivariate analysis showed that initial metastasis, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis were independent prognostic factors for reduced PFS, whereas poor performance status, initial metastasis, and bone metastasis were prognostic for reduced OS. Application of a previous prognostic model showed that observed PFS and OS survival curves for patients in various risk groups differed significantly (P?Conclusions A 3-week regimen of S-1 plus cisplatin was active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with AGC. Disease status and bone metastasis were the most important prognostic factors.     

Enhanced efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a phase 3 randomized trial (AMC0101)

Purpose

To improve the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and fluoropyrimidine (Mf) in gastric cancer, we designed a new regimen (iceMFP) and investigated in a phase III study.

Methods

We randomly assigned 640 patients with resectable and macroscopically recognizable serosa-invading gastric cancer to Mf or iceMFP group during operation. The Mf consisted of intravenous mitomycin-C (20 mg/m²) at 3–6 weeks after surgery and oral doxifluridine (460–600 mg/m²/day) starting 4 weeks after the administration of mitomycin-C and continuing for 3 months. The iceMFP consisted of intraoperative intraperitoneal cisplatin (100 mg), intravenous mitomycin-C (15 mg/m²) on postoperative day 1, followed by oral doxifluridine for 12 months, and six monthly intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m²). The primary endpoint was 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

A total of 521 patients (258 in Mf, 263 in iceMFP) were eligible for analysis after excluding patients with stage I disease, distant metastasis, or R1 resection. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the iceMFP group had a higher RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54–0.90; p = 0.006; 3-year RFS 60 % vs. 50 %) and overall survival (HR 0.71; 95 % CI 0.53–0.95; p = 0.02; 3-year overall survival, 71 vs. 60 %) compared with the Mf group. This was confirmed at extension analysis after a median 6.6 years of follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated with no differences in surgical complications.

Conclusion

The efficacy of adjuvant Mf was significantly improved by the additional therapeutic strategies of iceMFP. Considering negative results of AMC0201, these suggest that early initiation of chemotherapy and/or intraperitoneal cisplatin played a distinct role in the improved efficacy.     

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy

Background

Only partial cross-resistance between docetaxel and paclitaxel has been demonstrated in breast and ovarian cancers. Whether weekly paclitaxel is effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy remains unclear, and we aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in such patients.

Methods

Patients who had received docetaxel-based regimens were assigned to the prior-docetaxel group, and those who had never received docetaxel were designated as the non-docetaxel group. Paclitaxel at 80?mg/m² was administered by intravenous infusion in all patients, and this was repeated weekly for 3?weeks out of 4.

Results

Between April 2006 and June 2011, 65 patients were studied: 26 in the prior-docetaxel group and 39 patients were non-docetaxel group. The median age, gender, performance status, histological type, history of gastrectomy, and the locations and numbers of metastatic sites did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the prior-docetaxel group, the response rate (RR) was 14.2% (3/21) among patients with measurable lesions, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 79?days [95% confidence interval (CI), 47–135?days], and overall survival (OS) was 123?days (95% CI, 90–215?days) from the initiation of paclitaxel treatment. In the non-docetaxel group, the RR was 11.5% (3/26) among patients with measurable lesions, PFS was 82?days (95% CI, 52–106?days), and OS was 143?days (95% CI, 121–178?days). The efficacy of weekly paclitaxel thus appeared to be similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

Weekly paclitaxel was modestly active in patients with gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy.     

Phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly S-1 and docetaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with histologically proven, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, a performance status (PS) of 0?C2 and no prior chemotherapy history were eligible for inclusion (n?=?45). Patients received a total of 215 treatment courses (median, 4; range, 2?C12) of S-1 oral administration twice daily for 1?week followed by a drug-free interval of 1?week. Docetaxel (40?mg/m²) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15.

Results

We observed 25 partial responses (55.6%) and one complete response (2.2%), resulting in an overall response rate of 57.8%. Twenty-four patients (53.3%) received second-line chemotherapy. Five patients (11.1%) underwent R0 gastrectomy during the course of the study. The median overall survival time was 15.3?months, the median time to progression was 6.9?months, and the median duration of response in 26 patients was 8.0?months. Neutropenia was the most frequently observed (40.4%) haematological toxicity at grades 3 and 4 and leucopenia was the second most common (29.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions

S-1 plus docetaxel combination therapy in an outpatient setting provided promising activity with acceptable adverse toxicities.     

A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy trial of TS-1 for gastric cancer study demonstrated that postoperative S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year improved overall survival of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. The goals of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

Methods

In this single-center, open-label, phase II study, patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were eligible. For neoadjuvant chemotherapy, docetaxel 50 mg/m² on day (D) 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² on D1, and S-1 40 mg/m² bid orally on D1–14 were administrated every 3 weeks for three cycles. After DOS chemotherapy, gastrectomy was performed, and then, adjuvant S-1 40 mg/m² bid was given on D1–28 every 6 weeks for 1 year. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who did not experience grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia) and R0 resection rates.

Results

A total of 41 patients were enrolled. All patients completed three planned cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without disease progression. Eighteen patients (43.9 %) did not experience any grade 3–4 toxicity (except grade 3 neutropenia) during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in 40 patients (97.6 %).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could be performed safely with a high R0 resection rate in LAGC patients. A phase III trial is currently underway.     

Long-term results with oral fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable rectal cancer. A single-institution experience

Introduction

Neoadjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer (RC) is a standard of treatment. The use of oral fluoropyrimidines and new agents such as oxaliplatin may improve efficacy and tolerance.

Material and methods

Between 1999 and 2009, 126 RC patients with T3?CT4 and/or N+ disease were given three successive protocols: UFT (32), UFT-oxaliplatin (75) and capecitabine-oxaliplatin (19), alongside 45 Gy of radiotherapy; with surgery 4?C6 weeks after. Adjuvant treatment was given in all patients. The primary objective was pathologic complete response (pCR).

Results

Preoperative therapy was well tolerated, with no toxic deaths and a 15% grade 3?C4 toxicity rate. Eighty-five percent of patients received the full chemotherapy dose, 56% had an abdominoperineal resection, 6% reinterventions and 57% received the full adjuvant chemotherapy planned. The pCR rate was 13%. The downstaging rate was 80%; 8% had progression of disease. The relapse rate was 20%, with local relapse in 6%. By 5 years of followup, 92% of relapses had occurred. Median follow-up was 73 months, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 75% and 50%, and 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 79% and 66% respectively. There was no benefit from the use of oxaliplatin regarding survival or pCR rates. Older patients had worse long-term outcomes.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin is feasible and well tolerated. The risk of early progression is low. However, there was no added benefit with the use of oxaliplatin. There were no relapses in patients with pCR. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.     

Time to Adjuvant Therapy and Other Variables in Localized Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer (IJGC-D-13-00162)

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation in patients with completely resected gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer has been associated with better outcomes. In practice, however, there are often delays in commencing adjuvant therapy. The study aims to determine the prognostic importance of timing of adjuvant therapy in such patients.

Methods

A cohort of patients with early stage (IB–IVM0) gastric and GE junction cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2007 in the province of Saskatchewan was assessed. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify various clinic-pathological factors that correlate with disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

One hundred seventy-four eligible patients with a median age of 71 years (range 36–93) and M/F ratio of 113:61 were identified. Of 174 patients, 60 (35 %) received adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up was 18 months (interquartile range 9–37). Twenty-eight percent received adjuvant therapy within 56 days. Median DFS of patients who received adjuvant therapy within 56 days was 37 months (95 % CI 6.6–67.3) versus 33 months (95 % CI 18.3–47.7) if adjuvant therapy was administered beyond 56 days (p?=?0.67). On multivariate analysis, state III–IVM0 disease, hazard ratio (HR) 2.4 (95%CI 1.6–3.5), and age ≥65 years, HR 2.2 (95 % CI 1.4–3.5), were significantly correlated with inferior disease-free survival.

Conclusions

Only about one third of patients who received adjuvant therapy were treated within 56 days of surgery. Although stages III and IVM0 and older age were associated with inferior outcome, delay in adjuvant therapy was not associated with inferior survival.