Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) as a biomarker for resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathway is known to play a role in the acquisition of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its exact role in TKI resistance has so far remained unclear. Here, we interrogated the hypothesis that the IGF-1R may serve as a biomarker for, and may play a role in, intrinsic resistance to the EGFR-specific TKI gefitinib in NSCLC.

Methods

Total-IGF-1R and phosphorylated (p)-IGF-1R expression levels were related to gefitinib sensitivity in 23 NSCLC cell lines. This sensitivity was re-evaluated after knocking down IGF-1R expression and after IGF-1R up‐regulation through exogenous IGF-1 expression. The utility of IGF-1R expression as a predictive biomarker was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 98 primary NSCLC samples from patients treated with gefitinib.

Results

Seventeen of the cell lines tested were resistant to gefitinib, whereas 3 cell lines were sensitive. The three remaining cell lines showed intermediate values. Thirteen resistant cell lines were found to be positive for total-IGF-1R expression, while all the sensitive cell lines were negative, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81 % for total-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Seven resistant cell lines exhibited high p-IGF-1R levels, whereas all 3 sensitive cell lines were negative for p-IGF-1R, resulting in a PPV of 100 % for p-IGF-1R to predict resistance. Neither a knock-down of IGF-1R expression nor an activation of the IGF1-R pathway through exogenous IGF-1 expression affected gefitinib sensitivity. In primary NSCLC tissues, IGF-1R expression was found to be significantly higher in patients with progressive disease, i.e., showing gefitinib resistance, as compared to those with a complete or partial response.

Conclusions

IGF-1R acts as a predictor for resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines and NSCLC patients, but does not seem to play a role in the intrinsic resistance to this drug. High total-IGF-1R and p-IGR-1R levels may predict such a resistance. Since the underlying mechanism does not appear to be related to proliferation induction, alternative pathways should be explored.     

In vitro sequence-dependent synergism between paclitaxel and gefitinib in human lung cancer cell lines

Purpose

In clinical trials, the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) administered concomitantly with first-line cytotoxicity chemotherapy failed to confer a survival benefit to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to test whether paclitaxel followed by gefitinib is superior to other treatment schedules of NSCLC cell lines and to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Human lung cancer cell lines with wild-type and mutant-type EGFR genes were used as in vitro models to define the differential effects of various schedules of paclitaxel with gefitinib treatment on cell growth, signaling pathway, and cell cycle distribution.

Results

Sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects differed between EGFR-TKI-resistant and EGFR-TKI-sensitive lung cancer cell lines. Exposure to paclitaxel resulted in an increased pEGFR level. This increase in phosphorylation was inhibited by subsequent exposure to gefitinib, whereas during the reverse sequence, the inhibition effect was reduced. After paclitaxel exposure, a higher level of pEGFR was observed in mitotic than in interphase cells. The sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib resulted in greater anti-VEGF activity than did the reverse sequence. We confirmed that gefitinib arrested cells in G1, and paclitaxel arrested them in S phase. The sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib arrested cells in G1, whereas the reverse sequence arrested cells in S and G2 phases.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the sequence of paclitaxel followed by gefitinib may be superior to other sequences in treating NSCLC cell lines. Our results also provide molecular evidence to support clinical treatment strategies for patients with lung cancer.     

Inhibiting proliferation of gefitinib-resistant, non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Sensitivity to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is correlated with the presence of somatic mutations that affect the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Development of resistance to TKI is a major therapeutic problem in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Aim of this study is to identify agents that can overcome TKI resistance in NSCLC.

Methods

We used a carefully selected panel of 12 NSCLC cell lines to address this clinical problem. Initially, the cell lines were treated with a variety of 10 compounds. Cellular proliferation was measured via MTT assay. We then focused on the gefitinib-resistant, EGFR mutant cell lines [H1650: exon 19 and PTEN mutations; and H1975: exons 20 (T790M) and 21 (L858R)] to identify agents that could overcome TKI resistance.

Results

Both 17-DMAG (Hsp90 inhibitor) and belinostat (histone deacetylase inhibitor, HDACi) effectively decreased the growth of almost all NSCLC lines. Also, belinostat markedly decreased the expression of EGFR and phospho-Akt in the cells. Combination of 17-DMAG and belinostat synergistically inhibited in vitro proliferation of these cells. Furthermore, both agents and their combination almost completely prevented TKI-resistant tumor formation (EGFR T790M mutation) in a xenograft model.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the combination of 17-DMAG and belinostat should be examined in a clinical trial for TKI-resistant NSCLC cell.     

Combined epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: Chemo-refractoriness of cells harboring sensitizing-EGFR mutations in the presence of gefitinib

Background

Combined epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with chemotherapy is believed to be more effective in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitizing-EGFR mutation (SEM). This hypothesis failed to be realized clinically and needs to be examined in vitro.

Materials and methods

Using the tetrazolium colorimetric assay and classical isobole method, we investigated the combination effects of 6 gefitinib-chemotherapeutic doublets (gefitinib/cisplatin, gemcitabine, pemetrexed, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinorelbine) in a panel of 15 NSCLC cell lines.

Results

Upon treatment with the 6 gefitinib-chemotherapeutic doublets, the 12 cell lines that did not harbor SEM displayed a broad spectrum of group results, from obvious synergism to robust antagonism. The values of group mean combination index (mCIs) ranged from 0.769 to 1.201. In contrast, the 3 cell lines with SEM showed a tendency toward consistent antagonism to the tested doublets, impressively, with a narrow range of higher group mCIs (0.993–1.141). In the presence of gefitinib, the SEM or gefitinib-sensitive group was more chemo-refractory than the non-SEM (index of chemo-refractoriness (RI): 69.33 versus 42.67; P = 0.036) or gefitinib-resistant group (68.25 versus 40.64, P = 0.0108), respectively. The results of using the gefitinib/drug combinations with the gefitinib-sensitive non-SEM cell line H322 and the gefitinib-resistant EGFR mutant H820 shared patterns similar to those with the SEM and non-SEM cell lines, respectively.

Conclusion

Gefitinib-treated EGFR-TKI-sensitive NSCLC cells showed a wide spectrum of chemo-refractoriness, suggesting that concomitantly combined EGFR-TKI-chemotherapy might not be a good treatment strategy for NSCLC harboring SEM.     

Aberrant activation of the mTOR pathway and anti-tumour effect of everolimus on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background:

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein is important for cellular growth and homeostasis. The presence and prognostic significance of inappropriate mTOR activation have been reported for several cancers. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, such as everolimus (RAD001), are in development and show promise as anti-cancer drugs; however, the therapeutic effect of everolimus on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains unknown.

Methods:

Phosphorylation of mTOR (p-mTOR) was evaluated in 167 resected OSCC tumours and 5 OSCC cell lines. The effects of everolimus on the OSCC cell lines TE4 and TE11 in vitro and alone or in combination with cisplatin on tumour growth in vivo were evaluated.

Results:

Mammalian target of rapamycin phosphorylation was detected in 116 tumours (69.5%) and all the 5 OSCC cell lines. Everolimus suppressed p-mTOR downstream pathways, inhibited proliferation and invasion, and induced apoptosis in both TE4 and TE11 cells. In a mouse xenograft model established with TE4 and TE11 cells, everolimus alone or in combination with cisplatin inhibited tumour growth.

Conclusion:

The mTOR pathway was aberrantly activated in most OSCC tumours. Everolimus had a therapeutic effect both as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin. Everolimus could be a useful anti-cancer drug for patients with OSCC.     

Phase 1 trial of everolimus and gefitinib in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway restores gefitinib sensitivity in resistant cancer cell lines. A phase 1 study was conducted of the combination of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and gefitinib to determine a daily dose of everolimus with gefitinib in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Oral everolimus and gefitinib were both administered daily to patients with progressive NSCLC. Patients were enrolled in 3-patient cohorts at everolimus dose levels of 5 and 10 mg daily. All patients received gefitinib 250 mg daily. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose of everolimus was 5 mg when administered daily with gefitinib 250 mg. Two patients who were treated at the 10 mg dose level of everolimus experienced dose-limiting toxicity, including grade 5 hypotension and grade 3 stomatitis. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated no consistent, significant interaction on the t(max), C(max), and AUC(0-8h) of either agent. Two partial radiographic responses were identified among the 8 response-evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: For further study, everolimus at a dose of 5 mg daily in combination with daily gefitinib 250 mg is recommended. The 2 radiographic responses identified are encouraging. A phase 2 trial in patients with NSCLC is under way.     

Expression of an activated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Aims

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rare, and the current WHO classification divides this tumor entity into well-differentiated (neuro)endocrine tumors, well-differentiated (neuro)endocrine carcinomas, and poorly differentiated (neuro)endocrine carcinomas. Poorly differentiated (neuro)endocrine carcinoma is extremely aggressive, and no appropriate therapeutic approach has been established. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), an important regulator of cell proliferation and protein translation, is activated in various malignancies. Recent phase II trial has revealed the efficacy of mTOR inhibitor (RAD001; everolimus) against low-to-intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumors. However, the beneficial role of mTOR inhibitor against poorly neuroendocrine carcinoma remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to determine the activation of mTOR in gastropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Methods

Expression of p-mTOR(Ser2448) was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 20 gastropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (seven well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, four well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and nine poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas). Double immunohistochemistry was performed with p-Akt for patients with high p-mTOR expression.

Results

Expression of mTOR was seen in 9 (45%) of 20 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. High expression of p-mTOR was seen in 6 (67%) of 9 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas which was higher than the expression rate of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas, 3 (27%) of 11. All large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas showed high p-mTOR expression. Some tumor cells showed positive staining for p-mTOR co-expressed p-Akt.

Conclusions

High expression rate of p-mTOR in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (large-cell type) may suggest the potential role of mTOR inhibitors as effective therapeutic agents for this highly malignant disease.     

Erlotinib as salvage treatment after failure to first-line gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor—tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been recently shown to be effective as a first-line treatment in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC, especially for those with favourable clinical features such as female, non-smoker and adenocarcinoma. However, resistance to gefitinib ensues invariably and there is little evidence as for the effectiveness of subsequent salvage treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, another EGFR-TKI, after failed first-line use of gefitinib.

Method

Retrospective review of NSCLC patients with favourable clinical features who received gefitinib as first-line treatment and subsequent salvage treatment with erlotinib.

Results

A total of 21 patients with NSCLC were included in the study. Among them, 18 (85.7%) patients had disease control with gefitinib and 12 (57.1%) patients with salvage erlotinib. There was an association between the disease control with gefitinib and erlotinib (p = 0.031). The disease control rate of erlotinib was independent of the chemotherapy use between the two EGFR-TKIs.

Conclusion

For NSCLC patients with favourable clinical features, erlotinib was effective in those who had prior disease control with first-line gefitinib.     

Synergistic interactions between sorafenib and everolimus in pancreatic cancer xenografts in mice

Purpose

Molecular targeting of cellular signaling pathways is a promising approach in cancer therapy, but often fails to achieve sustained benefit because of the activation of collateral cancer cell survival and proliferation pathways. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of targeted agents that inhibit compensatory pathways would be more effective than single agents in controlling pancreatic cancer cell growth. We investigated whether everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, would together inhibit growth of low-passage, patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts in mice more efficaciously than either agent alone.

Methods

Tumor volume progression was measured following treatment with both drugs as single agents, in combination, and at multiple doses. Pharmacokinetics in tumors and other tissues was also assessed. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated quantitatively.

Results

A 5-week regimen of daily oral doses of 10 mg/kg sorafenib and 0.5 mg/kg everolimus, alone and in combination, did not achieve significant tumor growth inhibition. Higher doses (20 mg/kg of sorafenib and 1 mg/kg of everolimus) inhibited tumor growth significantly when given alone and caused complete inhibition of growth when given in combination. Tumor volume progression was described by a linear growth model, and drug effects were described by Hill-type inhibition. Using population modeling approaches, dual-interaction parameter estimates indicated a highly synergistic pharmacodynamic interaction between the two drugs.

Conclusions

The results indicate that combinations of mTOR and multi-kinase inhibitors may offer greater efficacy in pancreatic cancer than either drug alone. Drug effects upon tumor stromal elements may contribute to the enhanced anti-tumor efficacy.     

Combined inhibition of IGFR enhances the effects of gefitinib in H1650: a lung cancer cell line with EGFR mutation and primary resistance to EGFR-TK inhibitors

Purpose

H1650 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells display primary resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) although they have a deletion mutation on exon 19 of the EGFR gene. We investigated the effect of inhibition of both insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) and EGFR signaling considering that IGFR signaling pathway has been implicated in the development and progression with therapeutic resistance of various cancers including lung cancer.

Methods

Three human NSCLC cell lines with an EGFR mutation of PC-9, HCC827 and H1650 were used for experiment. Cell viability and proliferative activity were assessed by MTT and three-dimensional culture assay. Combination index was obtained by CalcuSyn software. The change of EGFR- and IGFR-related signals was evaluated by western blots.

Results

H1650 cells were 1,000 times more resistant to gefitinib and erlotinib than HCC827 and PC-9 cells possessing the same EGFR mutation. Phosphatase and tensin homolog loss and sustained phosphorylation of Akt in spite of treatment with gefitinib were evident only in H1650 cells. Interestingly, IGFR phosphorylation was decreased by gefitinib in HCC827 and PC-9 cells while being maintained in H1650 cells. Combined treatment with the IGFR inhibitors α-IR3 and AG1024 enhanced gefitinib-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis, and down-regulated phosphorylation of Akt, EGFR and IGFR.

Conclusion

Combined inhibition of IGFR signaling enhances the growth inhibitory and apoptosis-inducing effects of gefitinib, suggesting that this approach could be useful to overcome the primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in lung cancer.     

Overcoming acquired resistance to anticancer therapy: focus on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

Background

Most targeted anticancer therapies, as well as cytotoxic and radiation therapies, are encumbered by the development of secondary resistance by cancer cells. Resistance is a complex phenomenon involving multiple mechanisms, including activation of signaling pathways such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Novel strategies to overcome resistance by targeting these signaling pathways are being evaluated.

Methods

PubMed and key cancer congress abstracts were searched until July 2012 for preclinical and clinical data relating to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and anticancer treatment resistance, and use of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in resistant cancer cell lines and patient populations.

Results

Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently implicated in resistance to anticancer therapies, including biologics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, radiation, and cytotoxics. As such, inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are being rapidly evaluated in preclinical models and in clinical studies to determine whether they can restore therapeutic sensitivity when given in combination. In breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and glioblastoma, we find compelling preclinical evidence to show that inhibitors of PI3K or mTOR can restore sensitivity in resistant cells. Although clinical evidence is less mature, a recent Phase III study with the mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibition and several Phase I/II studies with PI3K inhibitors demonstrate proof-of-concept, warranting future clinical evaluation.

Conclusion

Current preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway could have utility in combination with other anticancer therapies to circumvent resistance by cancer cells. Multiple clinical studies are ongoing.     

Effect of κ-opioid receptor agonist on the growth of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells

Background:

It is becoming increasingly recognised that opioids are responsible for tumour growth. However, the effects of opioids on tumour growth have been controversial.

Methods:

The effects of κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist on the growth of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells were assessed by a cell proliferation assay. Western blotting was performed to ascertain the mechanism by which treatment with KOR agonist suppresses tumour growth.

Results:

Addition of the selective KOR agonist U50,488H to gefitinib-sensitive (HCC827) and gefitinib-resistant (H1975) NSCLC cells produced a concentration-dependent decrease in their growth. These effects were abolished by co-treatment with the selective KOR antagonist nor-BNI. Furthermore, the growth-inhibitory effect of gefitinib in HCC827 cells was further enhanced by co-treatment with U50,488H. With regard to the inhibition of tumour growth, the addition of U50, 488H to H1975 cells produced a concentration-dependent decrease in phosphorylated-glycogen synthase kinase 3β (p-GSK3β).

Conclusion:

The present results showed that stimulation of KOR reduces the growth of gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells through the activation of GSK3β.     

Serum levels of surfactant protein D predict the anti-tumor activity of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that has dramatic effects in selective patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A simple non-invasive method for predicting the efficacy of gefitinib is preferable in clinical settings. In this study, we evaluated prospectively whether surfactant protein-A (SP-A) and -D (SP-D) may be new conventional predictors of the efficacy of gefitinib treatment.

Methods

We measured serum SP-A and SP-D levels on days 0 and 29 in 40 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with 250?mg gefitinib daily. Eligibility criteria included performance status ??3, age ??80?years, and stage IIIB?CIV disease. In addition, EGFR mutations were analyzed in 24 patients.

Results

Multivariate analysis showed that favorable progression-free survival (PFS) after gefitinib treatment was associated with adenocarcinoma and high serum SP-D levels before treatment. EGFR mutation analysis of 24 patients showed that 16 patients had exon 19 deletion and/or exon 21 point mutations. EGFR mutations were significantly correlated with response to gefitinib and serum SP-D levels before treatment was significantly high in patients with the EGFR mutations. Serum SP-A levels were not associated with PFS.

Conclusions

The present study showed that measurement of serum SP-D levels before treatment in patients with NSCLC may be a new surrogate marker for predicting the response to gefitinib.     

Enhanced cytotoxicity induced by gefitinib and specific inhibitors of the Ras or phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase pathways in non-small cell lung cancer cells

In this study, we have characterized a panel of NSCLC cell lines with differential sensitivity to gefitinib for activating mutations in egfr, pik3ca, and k-ras, and basal protein expression levels of PTEN. The egfr mutant NSCLC cell line H1650 as well as the egfr wild type cell lines H292 and A431 were highly sensitive to gefitinib treatment, indicating that other factors determine gefitinib-sensitivity in egfr wild type cells. Activating k-ras mutations were specifically detected in gefitinib-resistant cells, suggesting that the occurrence of k-ras mutations is correlated with resistance to EGFR antagonists. No pik3ca mutations were detected within the panel of cell lines, and PTEN protein expression levels did not correlate with gefitinib sensitivity. Gefitinib effectively blocked Akt and Erk phosphorylation in two gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cell lines, further supporting our previous findings that persistent activity of the PI3K/Akt and/or Ras/Erk pathways is associated with gefitinib-resistance of NSCLC cell lines. Gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines, showing EGFR-independent activity of the PI3K/Akt or Ras/Erk pathways, were treated with gefitinib in combination with specific inhibitors of mTOR, P13K, Ras, and MEK. Additive cytotoxicity was observed in A549 cells co-treated with gefitinib and the MEK inhibitor U0126 or the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336 and in H460 cells treated with gefitinib and the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, but not in H460 cells treated with gefitinib and rapamycin. These data suggest that combination treatment of NSCLC cells with gefitinib and specific inhibitors of the PI3K/Akt and Ras/Erk pathways may provide a successful strategy.     

A phase I trial of everolimus in combination with 5-FU/LV,mFOLFOX6 and mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab in patients with refractory solid tumors

Purpose

This phase I study investigated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, and efficacy in three cohorts all treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus that was delivered (1) in combination with 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin (5-FU/LV), (2) with mFOLFOX6 (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin), and (3) with mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Methods

Patients were accrued using a 3-patient cohort design consisting of two sub-trials in which the maximum tolerated combination (MTC) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of everolimus and 5-FU/LV was established in Sub-trial A and of everolimus in combination with mFOLFOX6 and mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab in Sub-trial B.

Results

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for toxicity, 21 on Sub-trial A and 15 on Sub-trial B. In Sub-trial A, DLT was observed in 1/6 patients enrolled on dose level 1A and 2/3 patients in level 6A. In Sub-trial B, 2/3 patients experienced DLT on level 1B and subsequent patients were enrolled on level 1B-1 without DLT. Three of six patients in cohort 2B-1 experienced grade 3 mucositis, and further study of the combination of everolimus, mFOLFOX6 and panitumumab was aborted. Among the 24 patients enrolled with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, the median time on treatment was 2.7 months with 45 % of patients remaining on treatment with stable disease for at least 3 months.

Conclusions

While a regimen of everolimus in addition to 5-FU/LV and mFOLFOX6 appears safe and tolerable, the further addition of panitumumab resulted in an unacceptable level of toxicity that cannot be recommended for further study. Further investigation is warranted to better elucidate the role which mTOR inhibitors play in patients with refractory solid tumors, with a specific focus on mCRC as a potential for the combination of this targeted and cytotoxic therapy in future studies.     

Scheduling of paclitaxel and gefitinib to inhibit repopulation for optimal treatment of human cancer cells and xenografts that overexpress the epidermal growth factor receptor

Purpose

In clinical studies, evaluating the combination of chemotherapy and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib, treatments were administered concurrently, despite it being counter-intuitive to give a cytostatic agent concurrent with cycle-active chemotherapy. One strategy to enhance efficacy might be to give the agents sequentially, thus allowing selective inhibition of repopulation of cancer cells between doses of chemotherapy. Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that sequential administration might allow inhibition of repopulation by gefitinib, with tumor cells re-entering cycle to allow sensitivity to subsequent chemotherapy.

Methods

Sequential and concurrent administration of paclitaxel and gefitinib were studied in vitro and in xenografts using EGFR over-expressing, EGFR-mutant, and EGFR wild-type human cancer cell lines. We evaluated cell cycle distribution and repopulation during treatment.

Results

The sequential use of gefitinib and paclitaxel to treat EGFR over-expressing A431 cells in vitro decreased repopulation compared to chemotherapy alone, and there was greater cell kill compared to concurrent treatment. In contrast, combined treatment led to greater growth delay than use of gefitinib alone for concurrent but not for sequential treatment of mice bearing A431 xenografts; concurrent treatment had greater effects to reduce functional vasculature in the tumors. Conversely, sequential treatment led to greater growth delay than concurrent treatment of EGFR-mutant HCC-827 xenografts that are sensitive to lower doses of gefitinib.

Conclusions

These studies highlight the importance of considering effects on the cell cycle, and on the solid tumor microenvironment, including tumor vasculature, when scheduling cytostatic and cytotoxic agents in combination.     

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for everolimus and sorafenib in mice

Purpose

Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved as an immunosuppressant and for second-line therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor used as first-line therapy in HCC and RCC. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus and sorafenib alone and in combination in plasma and tissues, developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in mice, and assessed the possibility of PK drug interactions.

Methods

Single and multiple oral doses of everolimus and sorafenib were administered alone and in combination in immunocompetent male mice and to severe combined immune-deficient (SCID) mice bearing low-passage, patient-derived pancreatic adenocarcinoma in seven different studies. Plasma and tissue samples including tumor were collected over a 24-h period and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Distribution of everolimus and sorafenib to the brain, muscle, adipose, lungs, kidneys, pancreas, spleen, liver, GI, and tumor was modeled as perfusion rate-limited, and all data from the diverse studies were fitted simultaneously using a population approach.

Results

PBPK models were developed for everolimus and sorafenib. PBPK analysis showed that the two drugs in combination had the same PK as each drug given alone. A twofold increase in sorafenib dose increased tumor exposure tenfold, thus suggesting involvement of transporters in tumor deposition of sorafenib.

Conclusions

The developed PBPK models suggested the absence of PK interaction between the two drugs in mice. These studies provide the basis for pharmacodynamic evaluation of these drugs in patient-derived primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas explants.     

Prognostic significance of NSE mRNA in advanced NSCLC treated with gefitinib

Purpose

Current knowledge of the prognostic biomarkers of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib is poor. NSE mRNA as a potential prognostic biomarker of the effectiveness of gefitinib treatment in NSCLC, especially in the Chinese population, needs to be further validated.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 168 advanced NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib between May 2006 and July 2010. NSE mRNA was measured using quantitative RT-PCR analysis for correlation with the clinical outcomes.

Results

We found that NSE mRNA expression was inversely correlated with sensitivity to gefitinib in NSCLC patients. Patients without elevated NSE mRNA had a more RR (CR + RR) 45.1 % than elevated 18.9 % (P = 0.0005). Moreover, the time to progression was 6.0 versus 4.2 months, respectively. Log-rank test was marginally significant (χ² = 12.11, P = 0.0007) and Cox multivariate analysis revealed that NSE mRNA (HR = 3.076; 95 % CI 1.943–4.870; P < 0.0001) was an independent prognostic factor of NSCLC patients in the Chinese population.

Conclusion

For NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib, patients without elevated NSE mRNA had a better prognosis than those with elevated NSE mRNA. Pretreatment NSE mRNA holds great potential as a prognostic biomarker in advanced NSCLC. Therefore, it is proposed that NSE mRNA should be routinely detected to screen patients who are more likely to benefit from gefitinib-based treatment.     

Displayed correlation between gene expression profiles and submicroscopic alterations in response to cetuximab, gefitinib and EGF in human colon cancer cell lines

Background

EGFR is frequently overexpressed in colon cancer. We characterized HT-29 and Caco-2, human colon cancer cell lines, untreated and treated with cetuximab or gefitinib alone and in combination with EGF.

Methods

Cell growth was determined using a variation on the MTT assay. Cell-cycle analysis was conducted by flow cytometry. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate EGFR expression and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evidenced the ultrastructural morphology. Gene expression profiling was performed using hybridization of the microarray Ocimum Pan Human 40 K array A.

Results

Caco-2 and HT-29 were respectively 66.25 and 59.24 % in G0/G1. They maintained this level of cell cycle distribution after treatment, suggesting a predominantly differentiated state. Treatment of Caco-2 with EGF or the two EGFR inhibitors produced a significant reduction in their viability. SEM clearly showed morphological cellular transformations in the direction of cellular death in both cell lines treated with EGFR inhibitors. HT-29 and Caco-2 displayed an important reduction of the microvilli (which also lose their erect position in Caco-2), possibly invalidating microvilli absorption function. HT-29 treated with cetuximab lost their boundary contacts and showed filipodi; when treated with gefitinib, they showed some vesicles: generally membrane reshaping is evident. Both cell lines showed a similar behavior in terms of on/off switched genes upon treatment with cetuximab. The gefitinib global gene expression pattern was different for the 2 cell lines; gefitinib treatment induced more changes, but directly correlated with EGF treatment. In cetuximab or gefitinib plus EGF treatments there was possible summation of the morphological effects: cells seemed more weakly affected by the transformation towards apoptosis. The genes appeared to be less stimulated than for single drug cases.

Conclusion

This is the first study to have systematically investigated the effect of cetuximab or gefitinib, alone and in combination with EGF, on human colon cancer cell lines. The EGFR inhibitors have a weaker effect in the presence of EGF that binds EGFR. Cetuximab treatment showed an expression pattern that inversely correlates with EGF treatment. We found interesting cyto-morphological features closely relating to gene expression profile. Both drugs have an effect on differentiation towards cellular death.     

Antitumor activity of selective MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 in combination with PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models

Purpose

Although the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib have shown dramatic effects against EGFR mutant lung cancer, patients become resistant by various mechanisms, including gatekeeper EGFR-T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS mutation, thereafter relapsing. AZD6244 is a potent, selective, and orally available MEK1/2 inhibitor. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of AZD6244 alone or with BEZ235, an orally available potent inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) models.

Experimental design

NCI-H1975 with EGFR-T790M mutation, NCI-H1993 with MET amplification and NCI-H460 with KRAS/PIK3CA mutation human NSCLC cells were subcutaneous injected into the athymic nude mice respectively. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment with AZD6244, BEZ235, AZD6244 plus BEZ235, or control for 3 weeks, then all mice were sacrificed and tumor tissues were subjected to western blot analyses and immunohistochemical staining.

Results

AZD6244 could inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-H1993, but slightly inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-1975 and NCI-H460. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 markedly enhanced their antitumor effects and without any marked adverse events. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical staining revealed that AZD6244 alone reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, angiogenesis, and tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, MEK1/2 inhibition resulted in decreased AKT phosphorylation in NCI-H1993 tumor model. BEZ235 also inhibited AKT phosphorylation as well as their downstream molecules in all three tumor models. The antiangiogenic effects were substantially enhanced when the agents were combined, which may due to the reduced expression of matrix metallopeptidase-9 in tumor tissues (MMP-9).

Conclusions

In this study, we evaluated therapy directed against MEK and PI3K/mTOR in distinct gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 enhanced their antitumor and antiangiogenic effects. We concluded that the combination of a selective MEK inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was effective in suppressing the growth of gefitinib-resistant tumors caused by EGFR T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS/PIK3CA mutation. This new therapeutic strategy may be a practical approach in the treatment of these patients.