Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term problem associated with total hip arthroplasty with cement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the minimum thirteen-year results associated with cementless acetabular components that had been inserted by a single surgeon and to compare them with the results associated with cemented acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive, nonselected primary total hip replacements were performed in 108 patients with use of a Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component with a 28-mm head. The patients were evaluated clinically with use of a standard terminology questionnaire, and they were evaluated radiographically for loosening, component migration, wear, and osteolysis. The rates of revision for aseptic loosening and radiographic evidence of loosening for this cohort were compared with the rates for four previously reviewed consecutive series of hips in which the acetabular component had been inserted with cement. All patients were managed by the same surgeon, were followed for thirteen to fifteen years, and were evaluated with use of the same two criteria (revision and loosening) as the end points for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (seventy-two hips) were living and forty-two patients (forty-eight hips) had died after thirteen to fifteen years of follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and no acetabular component had migrated. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 81% +/- 8% at fifteen years. With revision of the acetabular component for clinical failure (osteolysis, wear, loosening, or dislocation) as the end point, the survival rate was 94% +/- 8% at fifteen years. Among the seventy hips with at least thirteen years of radiographic follow-up, five had pelvic osteolysis and three had had revision of a well-fixed acetabular component because of pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear. The mean linear wear rate was 0.15 mm/yr (0.12 mm/yr when one outlier was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of fixation, Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular components performed better than did cemented 22-mm-inner-diameter Charnley acetabular components as well as 28-mm-inner-diameter all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. However, the rate of wear was greater in association with the Harris-Galante-I cementless components than it was in association with the Charnley cemented all-polyethylene components.     

Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of cementless acetabular revision with deep frozen morsellised allografts. Sixty-one patients (65 hips) underwent acetabular revision using cementless components and deep frozen morsellised allografts. Fifty-seven hips (53 patients) were reviewed at a mean of 105.1 months (range 72–180 months) after revision. The study group included 29 males and 24 females with a mean age of 46.4 years. One cup underwent further revision for aseptic loosening and two were defined as radiographic failures. The mean time for allograft incorporation was 12.5 months (range 6–24 months) after index surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the patients improved from 61.1 points preoperatively to 91.6 points postoperatively. Linear and cavitary osteolysis was observed in two and 12 hips, respectively. The acetabular revision using cementless components with deep frozen morsellized allografts provides favourable clinical and radiographic results, although the initial disease and age may adversely affect the outcomes.     

Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Although cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery, few investigators have evaluated the retention and efficacy of these components in the long term. In the current study, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of arthroplasties performed by one surgeon with a cementless acetabular component were assessed at a minimum of ten years. METHODS: From 1986 through 1988, sixty-one consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in fifty-five patients because of aseptic failure of one or both components of a prosthesis in which both components had been cemented. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-two hips) were alive at a mean of 12.9 years (range, 11.5 to 14.3 years) after the operation. In all of the patients, the acetabular component was revised to a porous-coated Harris-Galante component inserted without cement, and the femoral component was revised to an Iowa component affixed with contemporary cementing techniques. The hips were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a minimum of ten years subsequent to the index revision. No hips were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: None of the acetabular components required revision because of aseptic loosening. Two hips (3%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The polyethylene liner was exchanged during the follow-up period in eight hips. CONCLUSION: After a minimum of ten years of follow-up, cementless acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty had produced durable results that were markedly better than those reported for acetabular fixation with cement.     

Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation cementless femoral components were designed to provide more reliable ingrowth and to limit distal osteolysis by incorporating circumferential proximal ingrowth surfaces. We examined the eight to eleven-year results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, anatomically designed femoral component and a cementless hemispheric acetabular component. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties with implantation of a femoral component with a circumferential proximal porous coating (Anatomic Hip) and a cementless hemispheric porous-coated acetabular component (Harris-Galante II) were performed in eighty-five patients. These patients were prospectively followed clinically and radiographically. Six patients (seven hips) died and five patients (seven hips) were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-four patients (seventy-eight hips) who had been followed for a mean of ten years (range, eight to eleven years). The mean age at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-two years. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 51 points improved to 94 points at the time of final follow-up; 86% of the hips had a good or excellent result. Thigh pain was reported as mild to severe after seven hip arthroplasties. No femoral component was revised for any reason, and none were loose radiographically at the time of the last follow-up. Two hips underwent acetabular revision (one because of dislocation and one because of loosening). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision or loosening of any component as the end point. The ten-year survival rate was 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the total hip prosthesis, 100% for the femoral component, and 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the acetabular component. Radiolucencies adjacent to the nonporous portion of the femoral component were seen in sixty-eight (93%) of the -seventy-three hips with complete radiographic follow-up. Femoral osteolysis proximal to the lesser trochanter was noted in four hips (5%). No osteolysis was identified distal to the lesser trochanter. Periacetabular osteolysis was identified in twelve hips (16%). Five patients underwent exchange of the acetabular liner because of polyethylene wear. CONCLUSIONS: This second-generation cementless, anatomically designed femoral component provided excellent clinical and radiographic results with a 100% survival rate at ten years. The circumferential porous coating of this implant improved ingrowth and prevented distal osteolysis at a mean of ten years after the arthroplasty.     

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis After Kidney Transplantation

This study was to determine the mid- to long-term survivorship of cementless metal-on-metal THA in 52 patients (74 hips) who underwent THA for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with a cementless THA. The mean follow-up was 10.2 years. The mean age at operation was 42.1 years (range, 25–62 years). The survivorship analysis with revision as the end point estimated a 96.6% chance of THA survival during 16.4 years. The average Harris hip score at last follow-up was 89.2 points (range, 74–100). Two patients (two hips) required revision surgery for extensive acetabular osteolysis at 9 years and acetabular liner dissociation at 2 years. The survival rates of cementless THA in these patients are encouraging. However, the possibility of metallic wear related complications are raising concern.     

The incorporation of morselized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions

The treatment of large osteolytic lesions is a challenge during acetabular revisions. Periprosthetic bone loss can compromise the stability of new implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5- to 10-year clinical and radiographic results of morselized bone grafting for acetabular osteolysis during cementless acetabular revisions. Ninety-nine patients (108 hips) who had an acetabular revision hip arthroplasty for osteolysis were retrospectively reviewed. There were 44 men and 55 women who had a mean age of 66 years. At the index revision, the acetabular defects were debrided of granulomatous tissue and packed tightly with morselized cancellous femoral head allograft. All the revision acetabular components were implanted using cementless fixation. At a mean followup of 85 months (range, 60-118 months), the results of 103 of 108 hips (95%) were clinically and radiographically successful. The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 37 points, which improved to a mean of 91 points at the last followup. All cavitary defects had complete radiographic incorporation of the bone grafts except for two lesions. The results of this study indicate that morselized bone graft incorporates into cementless acetabular revisions. This treatment method provided a stable reconstruction in 98% of patients at a mean of 7 years followup.     

应用非骨水泥髋臼或金属髋臼支架行髋关节翻修术的临床研究

目的 评估非骨水泥髋臼及金属髋臼支架加植骨修复髋臼骨缺损的效果.方法 我院自2001年9月至2008年9月应用髋臼翻修支架行髋关节翻修术22例(24髋).其中Lima非骨水泥人工翻修髋臼2例(2髋),Kerboull 支架2例(2髋),GAP 髋臼翻修支架18例(20髋).男性6例(6髋),女性16例(18髋).平均年龄62岁(34～79岁).感染性松动2例(2髋),无菌松动20例(22髋).平均随访时间48个月(18～84个月),对其进行临床和影像学评估.Harris评分术前平均为56分(44～75分).结果 末次随访时22例患者Harris评分平均为89分(78～94分).优良率为95.5%(21/22).三种髋臼翻修支架的外展角满意,髋臼旋转中心基本得到了重建.髋臼翻修支架及其聚氯乙烯臼无明显移位,假体周围无透亮线,髋臼植骨愈合良好.结论 应用非骨水泥髋臼或髋臼支架修复髋臼侧巨大骨缺损,重建了髋臼正常旋转中心、提供了翻修假体的初期稳定性、避免了所植骨在血管化时期的过度机械负重,是翻修髋臼巨大骨缺损的可靠方法.     

Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Removal of a well-fixed cementless acetabular component can result in increased operative time and postoperative morbidity. The objectives of this retrospective study were to determine whether retention of a well-fixed acetabular component at the time of isolated femoral revision was compatible with long-term socket survival. METHODS: The records of eighty-three consecutive patients (ninety hips) in whom a well-fixed cementless socket had been retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 48.7 years at the time of the primary arthroplasty and 54.1 years at the time of femoral revision. The radiographic analysis was based on anteroposterior radiographs and was performed by a single independent reviewer. The intraoperative criterion for stability of the socket was the absence of movement at the bone-implant interface during the application of direct pressure to the edges of the socket in four quadrants with use of a metallic pusher. RESULTS: At the time of the isolated femoral revision, no socket demonstrated a radiolucent line measuring >1 mm in any two zones and forty of the ninety hips had periacetabular osteolysis. The mean size of the osteolytic lesions was 5.71 cm(2) (range, 0.4 to 24.2 cm(2)), and twenty-eight of the forty hips underwent bone-grafting. The mean duration of follow-up was 9.7 years after the isolated femoral revision and 14.9 years after the primary arthroplasty. Five acetabular sockets were revised at a mean of 6.8 years after the femoral revision. Only one of these sockets had failed because of aseptic loosening. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 98.7% at five years and 93.5% at ten years after the femoral revision and 100% at ten years and 93.9% at fifteen years after the primary arthroplasty. No hip showed recurrence or expansion of periacetabular osteolysis. The prevalence of dislocation was 16% (fourteen of ninety). CONCLUSIONS: Revision of a stable, cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of its duration in vivo or the presence of periacetabular osteolysis does not appear to be warranted. Retention of the socket with grafting of larger periacetabular osteolytic lesions appears to be consistent with satisfactory socket longevity.     

A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results

Two hundred fifty-eight primary total hip arthroplasties in 231 patients were implanted using a circumferentially, proximally porous-coated, collared femoral component and a cementless, hemispherical, porous-coated acetabular component and followed up for a mean of 9 years (5-14 years). Four femoral components were revised (2 stems for infection and 2 stems for aseptic loosening). One additional femoral component was radiographically loose at last follow-up. Nine hips underwent acetabular revision (4 for instability, 2 for infection, 2 for loosening, and 1 for osteolysis). Ten-year survivorship with revision or loosening of any component as the end point was 92%; with femoral component aseptic loosening as end point, survivorship was 98%; with acetabular aseptic loosening as the end point, survivorship was 99%. Osteolysis was identified in 26 hips (13%).     

Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty

This study is a 5- to 11-year retrospective followup of 40 hips in 33 patients with cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of a cemented total hip arthroplasty. A porous coated, Harris-Galante acetabular component was used in all revisions. Thirty-eight of the 40 hips received acetabular bone grafting at revision. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 51 points just before the index cementless revision to 87 points at the most recent followup. Twenty-nine of 40 (73%) hips were classified as having a good or excellent result. Radiolucencies were observed in seven of the 40 (18%) hips at the most recent followup, but none of these radiolucencies were complete or progressive. Five of the 40 (13%) hips were rated as failures and required repeat revision. Two (5%) of these failures were caused by aseptic loosening, with both hips having severe acetabular bone damage at the time of the index revision. This failure rate for aseptic loosening was less than that reported for cemented acetabular revision, thereby confirming the efficacy of cementless acetabular components in revision hip surgery in the intermediate term.     

Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture have yielded inferior results compared to primary nontraumatic THA. Recently, improved results have been demonstrated using cementless acetabular reconstruction. Thirty-two patients underwent THA for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture; 24 were treated with open reduction internal fixation, and 8 were managed conservatively. Time from fracture to THA was 36 months (6-227 months). Average follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0-9.7 years). Harris Hip score increased from 28 (0-56) to 82 points (20-100). Six patients required revision. Five-year survival with revision, loosening, dislocation, or infection as an end point was 79%. Survival for aseptic acetabular loosening was 97%. Revision surgery correlated with nonanatomic restoration of the hip center and a history of infection (P < .05). Despite obvious challenges, advances in fracture management and cementless acetabular fixation in THA demonstrate improved results for posttraumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture.     

Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hips

BACKGROUND: Studies of acetabular reconstruction with use of cement and bulk bone graft have demonstrated increasing rates of cup failure in patients with dysplastic hips seven years after total hip arthroplasty. Comparable data on the long-term results of bulk bone-grafting done in conjunction with cementless implants are limited. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiographic results of autologous bulk bone-grafting in conjunction with a cementless cup. METHODS: From 1987 to 1992, forty-seven patients (forty women and seven men, with an average age of 50.4 years) who had developmental dysplasia of the hip underwent fifty-six total hip arthroplasties and received a structural graft in combination with a cementless Harris-Galante type-I cup. All patients were followed prospectively. In fifty-five hips, implant migration was measured with single-image radiographic analysis. RESULTS: After an average duration (and standard deviation) of 10.2 +/- 2.9 years, three patients (four hips) had died. In the surviving patients, four implants had been revised and two had radiographic evidence of loosening. With use of revision and loosening as end points, the eleven-year survival rates were 91.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Of the fifty implants that had no loosening, fourteen had measurable cup migration, thirty-five had no migration, and one implant could not be measured. All migrations but one were progressive. With loosening used as the end point, the survival rate at eleven years was 100% for the implants with no migration; however, the survival rate for the cups that had migrated was 69.3% (p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: The eleven-year survival rate for the spherical press-fit cups in combination with bulk bone-grafting is satisfactory, given the complexity of these reconstructions. However, the difference between the survival of the implants that had migrated and those that had not was significant. We expect that the thirteen implants with progressive acetabular migration at the time of the latest follow-up are at risk for loosening, which will increase the revision rate for this series in the coming years.     

Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Extra-large uncemented components provide several advantages for acetabular revision, but limited information is available on the results of their use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, at a minimum of five years, the results associated with the use of an extra-large uncemented porous-coated component for acetabular revision in the presence of bone loss. METHODS: Eighty-nine extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components were used for revision after aseptic failure of a total hip arthroplasty in forty-six men and forty-three women (mean age at revision, fifty-nine years; range, thirty to eighty-three years). The revision implant (a Harris-Galante-I or II cup fixed with screws) had an outside diameter of > or = 66 mm in men and > or = 62 mm in women. Seventy-nine patients had a segmental or combined segmental and cavitary acetabular bone deficiency before the revision. Particulate bone graft was used in fifty-four hips and bulk bone graft, in nine. RESULTS: One patient died with the acetabular component intact and two patients were lost to follow-up within five years after the operation. At the time of the last follow--up, four acetabular components had been removed or revised again (two for aseptic loosening). All of the remaining patients were followed clinically for at least five years (mean, 7.2 years; range, 5.0 to 11.3 years). In the hips that were not revised again, only two sockets had definite radiographic evidence of loosening. All four of the sockets that loosened were in hips that had had combined cavitary and segmental bone loss preoperatively. In the hips that were not revised again, the mean modified Harris hip score increased from 56 points preoperatively to 83 points at the time of the most recent follow-up. The most frequent complication, dislocation of the hip, occurred in eleven patients. The probability of survival of the acetabular component at eight years was 93% (95% confidence interval, 85% to 100%) with removal for any reason as the end point, 98% (95% confidence interval, 92% to 100%) with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, and 95% (95% confidence interval, 88% to 100%) with radiographic evidence of loosening or revision for aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that extra-large uncemented components used for acetabular revision in the presence of bone loss perform very well and have a low rate of aseptic loosening at the time of intermediate-term follow-up.     

Cementless acetabular cup: 6-year follow-up

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of cementless acetabular cups used in primary total hip arthroplasty. From November 1993 to December 1998, we implanted 403 cementless acetabular cups. Here we present a review of 160 patients (97 women) who received cementless acetabular cups with a porous-coated surface. The average postoperative follow-up period was 6 years (range, 4–8 years). The mean age of patients was 68 years for cemented stems (65 hips) and 59 for uncemented stems (95 hips). A total of 104 patients received ceramic-polyethylene components and 56 had ceramic-ceramic components. One patient presented acetabular migration and needed revision after 5 months indicating a failure rate of 0.6%. We believe that our results provides quite good perspectives for future work with this acetabular component. Received: 3 May 2002, Accepted: 10 May 2002     

Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions

BACKGROUND: There are few longer-term follow-up reports of the results and complications of the use of cementless acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty. In this study, we analyzed the clinical and radiographic results to determine the factors that affect longer-term survival of titanium-fiber-metal-coated acetabular components. METHODS: During a fourteen-year period, one surgeon performed 211 consecutive unselected cementless acetabular revisions in 194 patients with a mean age of sixty-two years. The same technique was used for all revisions: the component was impacted and was fixed with multiple screws, and bone deficiencies were augmented with supplemental bone graft. Both the acetabular and the femoral components were revised in 142 hips, whereas an isolated acetabular revision was performed in sixty-nine hips. All 211 revisions were included in a survivorship analysis to twelve years. Prospectively determined clinical results in 135 hips and radiographic results in 131 hips were available at a minimum of five years postoperatively. RESULTS: Seven acetabular components were removed: three, because of infection; one, because of recurrent dislocation; and three, because of mechanical loosening. There was asymptomatic radiographic loosening of one additional acetabular component, for a total rate of aseptic loosening of 2%. The twelve-year prosthetic survival rate was 95% (95% confidence interval, 91% to 99%), with failure defined as component removal for any reason. There was no significant difference in the rate of survival of the cup or femoral component between the sixty-nine hips treated with isolated acetabular revision and the 142 hips in which both components were revised. There was a significant difference in the rate of dislocation between the hips treated with isolated acetabular revision (dislocation in fourteen hips, 20%) and those in which both components had been revised (dislocation in eleven hips, 8%; p = 0.03), but there was no difference in component survival if a dislocation occurred. There was a significant association between a patient weight of >82 kg and acetabular failure (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This titanium-fiber-metal-coated hemispheric component fixed with multiple screws had a twelve-year survival rate of 95% when used in an unselected, consecutive series of acetabular revisions. The rate of dislocation was significantly higher in the patients treated with isolated acetabular revision, and routine postoperative bracing is now recommended for that group.     

Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report

We previously reported our results at a minimum of three and seven years after use of a porous-coated acetabular metal shell in a consecutive series of 138 revision total hip arthroplasties. The current report presents the longer-term outcomes of these procedures, at fifteen to nineteen years postoperatively. A total of twenty metal shells (14%) underwent repeat revision. Seven of the repeat revisions were performed because of recurrent dislocation, seven were done at the time of femoral revision surgery, and six were done because of infection. Nineteen of the revised shells were well fixed, and one was aseptically loose. Of the sixty-seven hips in which the acetabular component survived for more than fifteen years after the index operation, two (3%) required a change of the modular acetabular liner because of wear or osteolysis. Nine (16%) of the fifty-seven hips with at least fifteen years of radiographic follow-up had an osteolytic lesion of >1 cm in diameter. The fifteen-year survival rate of the metal shells, with failure defined as revision because of loosening or as radiographic evidence of loosening, was 97%. Revision total hip arthroplasty with this cementless acetabular component has been followed by excellent component survivorship at fifteen years; the most common reasons for repeat revision were recurrent dislocation and infection.     

Total hip arthroplasty with the use of nonmodular cementless acetabular component

Sixty-seven hips in 63 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasties with the use of the nonmodular cementless acetabular component and alumina-on-polyethylene bearing surface were available for complete clinical and radiographic review at a mean follow-up period of 7 (range 5-9) years. The mean age was 59 years (range 34-75) years. The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 50 points improved to 93 points at final follow-up. One (1.5%) hip required revision for a recurrent dislocation. No component was loose radiographically at final follow-up. The mean linear wear rate was 0.07 (range 0.01-0.23) mm/y. At a mean follow-up of 7 years, there was no aseptic loosening. Further follow-up, however, is necessary to determine the potential advantage of nonmodular acetabular component for the development of pelvic osteolysis.     

Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Tofruetancloc nthisoitpnru sac.rttih oOrnorpig ltaiensctahylln y(i,qTuH emAa)jfoo irrs a Td HweteAelrli-o etrseatctaehbdnliiqs huheeidpsutilized bone cement for fixation,but loosening rate ofthe acetabular component was very high because ofbone cement tec…     

Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without removal of a well-fixed femoral component: A 3- to 9-year follow-up study

The results of isolated acetabular revision performed in 31 patients (32 hips) were monitored for between 3 and 9 years. All femoral components were well fixed and not removed or revised at the time of index surgery. There were 4 hips with little or no acetabular bony defect, 2 hips with pure segmental defects (type I), 10 hips with cavitary defects (type II), 15 with combined segmental cavitary defects (type III), and 1 with pelvic discontinuity (type IV). All revision acetabular implants were cementless, using a porous-coated hemispheric cup with or without bone-graft. There were four grade I reconstructions, 16 grade II reconstructions, and 12 grade III reconstructions. At final follow-up evaluation 94% of the cups were judged to be stable. Two hips required a second revision acetabuloplasty because of loss of fixation of the cup. The 2 repeat revisions were also done without removal of the femoral component. One acetabular component had evidence of rotational migration, which stabilized and remained nonprogressive. There were no cases of femoral component radiographic or clinical failure. The mean pre and postoperative hip scores were 44 and 83, respectively. The pre- and postoperative pain scores were 12 and 42, respectively. The findings of this study suggest that isolated acetabular revision, using a cementless porous-coated hemispheric cup, can be successfully performed without removing or revising a well-fixed femoral stem and not compromise the final outcome.     

Cementless total hip arthroplasty in Chinese patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

This study was designed to evaluate the midterm (> or = 5 years) clinical and radiographic outcomes of the cementless total hip arthroplasty in 64 Chinese patients (72 hips), which revealed that the mean Harris hip score increased from an average of 44.0 points before operation to 92.4 points at the last follow-up. Excellent results were achieved in 60 hips (83%). No loosening of the components was observed radiographically. No revision of the femoral components was required. Only one focal area of pelvic osteolysis in 1 hip (1%), which requires a revision, and some small focal areas of femoral osteolysis in 12 hips (17%) were observed. The mean linear wear rate was 0.125 mm/y. The survival rate of the acetabular and femoral components for radiographic loosening was 100% (95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.0) and for revision was 98.61% (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.0). This study indicated that the cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head has a satisfactory midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes, but the long-term effect should be further studied.