Proposal of a Method for Automatic Optimization of Left Heart Atrioventricular Interval Applicable to DDD Pacemakers

Electrical pacing of the right heart is known to cause delays in the depolarization of left heart chambers, leading to abnormal left heart AV sequence. Interatrial conduction time, defined as the time from the right atrial pacing pulse or intrinsic P to the onset of left atrial P wave, and P wave sensing delay cause a shorter left heart AV interval during atrial pacing-ventricular sensing and atrial sense-ventricular pace. Interventricular conduction time (the time from the right ventricular pacing pulse to the onset of left ventricular depolarization), lengthens left heart AV interval during atrial sensing-ventricular pacing. These delays may add up or partly cancel out, depending on pacing mode. Thus, an algorithm for DDD pacemakers to optimize left heart AV interval by compensating for the above delays is proposed. This algorithm takes into account pacing and sensing delays to deliver a certain AV sequence to the right heart, aimed at producing a physiological left heart AV interval. The optimization of left heart AV interval is achieved by automatically changing right heart AV interval and pacing mode in accordance with known interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, and P wave sense offset.     

Interatrial Conduction During Cardiac Pacing

DDD pacemakers sense and pace right-sided cardiac chambers. The relationship of atrial to ventricular systole on the left side of the heart is of importance for systemic hemodynamics. Effective atrioventricular synchrony is partially determined by interatrial conduction time (IACT). At the time of DDD pacemaker implantation, interatrial conduction was measured using an intraesophageal pill electrode in 25 patients who were on no cardiac medications. Mean interatrial conduction time for all patients prolonged from 95 ± 18 ms during sinus rhythm to 122 ± 30 ms during right atrial pacing (p < 0.001). In 16 patients with P wave duration < 110 ms interatrial conduction prolonged from 85 ± 10 ms during sinus rhythm to 111 ± 9 ms during right atrial pacing (p < 0.01) compared to 114 ± 20 ms prolonging to 111 ± 19 ms (p < 0.01] in 9 patients with P wave duration > 110 ms. In each patient, while atrioventricular conduction prolonged with incremental right atrial pacing, interatrial conduction times did not vary. Interatrial conduction prolongs from baseline during atrial pacing and remains constant at all paced rates from 60–160 heats per minute. In addition to longer interatrial conduction times during sinus rhythm, patients with electrocardiographic P wave prolongation have longer interatrial conduction times during right atrial pacing than do normals (p < 0.0001). Based on interatrial conduction times alone, the AV interval during DDD cardiac pacing should be approximately 25 ms longer during AV pacing as compared to atrial tracking.     

Pacemaker Syndrome in a Patient with DDD Pacemaker for Long QT Syndrome

A patient with long QT syndrome was treated with beta blockers and had a permanent DDD pacemaker implanted. The lower rate was set to 85 beats/min because this provided the best shortening of QT interval at the lowest paced heart rate. The atrioventricular (AV) delay was programmed to 250 msec to allow native AV conduction. Patient returned complaining of symptoms suggestive of pacemaker syndrome. ECG during one of these episodes showed AV sequential pacing. Doppler echocardiography of hepatic vein flow suggested atrial contraction against a closed tricuspid valve. Endocardial electrogram telemetry demonstrated ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction with the retrograde atrial electrogram falling within the atrial refractory period and thus was not sensed. The following atrial stimulus did not capture because of the atrial refractoriness. Ventricular pacing proceeded after the programmed AV delay. Reprogramming the AV delay to 200 msec restored AV synchrony by allowing the atrial stimulus to capture by placing it outside of the refractory period of the atrium. No further symptoms reported during six months of follow-up.     

What Range of Programmable AV Delays is Necessary in Antibradycardia DDD Stimulation?

DDD pacemakers differ considerably in device specific extents of AV delay (AVD) programmability. To demonstrate the requirements of a mean DDD pacemaker patient population optimal AVDs in 200 DDD pacemaker patients (age 8 to 91 years) were estimated by left atrial electrography. The results should help to define an AVD programmability standard. Left atrial electrograms were recorded via a bipolar filtered esophageal lead. The method aims on adjusting the left atrial electrogram to 70 ms prior to the ventricular spike, both during VDD and DDD operation of the pacemaker. In atrial sensed stimulation the optimal AVD varied from 40 to 205 ms (100.5 ± 24.5 ms) and in atrial paced stimulation from 85 to 245 ms (169.1 ±24.5 ms). The difference of the mean values is statistically significant (p < 0.001). The difference between both values in the individual patient, the individual AVD correction time, varied from 0 to 170 ms (68.7 ± 26.6 ms). Thus, from our findings requirements on AV delay programmability standard can be derived: AVDs (1) should have a range from 40 to 250 ms, (2) should be independently programmable during atrial sensed and atrial paced operation, ami (3) should provide as nominal settings 100 ms for atrial sensed and 170 ms for atrial paced stimulation.     

Is DDD Pacing Superior to VVI,R? A Study on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption at Rest and During Exercise

Rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVI,R) has been demonstrated to equal atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (DDD) with regard to hemodynamics and exercise tolerance. Whether the two modes are also comparable, with regard to cardiac metabolic effects, is not yet dear. We assessed central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity fcardiac norepinephrine overflow), and myocardial oxygen consumption in 16 patients treated with rate responsive atrial synchronous ventricular pacemakers (DDD,R), due to high degree AV block. The study was performed at rest and during supine exercise at two workloads (30 ± 12 and 68 ± 24 watts, respectively) during VDD and rate matched VVI pacing (VVI_m). Ventricular rates at rest and during both workloads were almost identical. Cardiac output at rest tended to be higher in the VDD mode, due to a slightly higher stroke volume. Central pressures including right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar in the pacing modes. The coronary sinus blood flow, the coronary sinus arteriovenous oxygen difference, and the myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between the two pacing modes. Cardiac norepinephrine overflow was similar in the two pacing modes, at rest or during exercise. Thus, we found no significant differences between VDD and VVI_m pacing with regard to central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), or myocardial oxygen consumption either at rest or during moderate exercise.     

DDD pacing and interatrial conduction block: importance of optimal AV interval setting

The case of a 83-year-old patient undergoing DDD pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome with postimplant detection of advanced interatrial conduction block is described. At nominal AV interval programming values (175 ms), absence of P wave following an atrial spike was observed, and the presence of an interatrial conduction disturbance was demonstrated by a Doppler transmitral flow pattern analysis and transesophageal ECG recording. AV interval lengthening up to 300 ms resulted in proper timing of atrial and ventricular contractions. Awaiting for conclusive data about biatrial pacing, interatrial conduction blocks can be managed in some cases by proper programming of conventional DDD systems.     

Intrinsic Conduction Maximizes Cardiopulmonary Performance in Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemakers

Dual chamber pacemaker programmability allows the possibility of atriallytracked ventricular pacing in patients who would otherwise have intrinsic atrioventricular (AV) conduction. Thirteen patients with permanent AV sequential pacemakers (ages 50–79) were evaluated with paired exercise tests to determine the Cardiopulmonary effects of pacemaker induced right ventricular activation compared with normal AV and intraventricular conduction. Peak oxygen uptake (VO₂), oxygen pulse (O₂P), respiratory rate (RR), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were determined using breath by-breath analysis of expired gases. Patients exercised to fatigue and exercise tests were performed in random sequence. For patients with intrinsic AV conduction (group I, n = 8) the AV delay was programmed to preserve intrinsic conduction during one study; the alternate test used AV delay programming to produce ventricular pacing. Five patients with chronic AV block (group II) acted as a control for the effects of a rate adaptive AV delay compared to a fixed AV delay. Paired t-testing showed a significantly lower peak VO₂ (P < 0.015) and O₂P (P < 0.01) in patients with atrially-tracked ventricular pacing compared to intrinsic conduction. In contrast, group II showed a significant improvement in peak VO₂ with rate adaptive AV delay compared to fixed AV delay programming (P < 0.05). In conclusion, intrinsic conduction should be preserved in patients with dual chamber pacemakers whenever possible.     

Diagnosis of Atrial Undersensing in Dual Chamber Pacemakers: Impact of Autodiagnostic Features

Atrial undersensing occurs in a considerable number of patients, both with single lead VDD pacemakers and with DDD devices. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of electrocardiographic methods and autodiagnostic pacemaker features to detect atrial sensing dysfunction. Two hundred and thirty-one patients with AV block received single lead VDD pacemakers or DDD devices. Atrial sensitivity was programmed to 0.1 or 0.18 in VDD devices and to 0.5 mV in DDD devices; the rate limits were set to 40 and 160 beats/min. Twelve-lead ECG recording for 1 minute during deep respiration and change of body position, 24-hour Holter ECG recording, and treadmill exercise were performed 2 weeks and 15 months after pacemaker implantation. AV synchrony and, if available, P wave amplitude histogram were sampled by autodiagnostic pacemaker features and compared to electrocardiographic findings. Atrial undersensing was assumed, if AV synchrony was below 100% or if minimal P wave amplitude (PWA) was equal to the programmed atrial sensitivity. Intermittent atrial undersensing occurred in 20.7% of patients. The diagnostic sensitivities of the various methods used to detect atrial sensing failures were: 24-hour Holter monitoring 97.5%, P wave amplitude histogram 90.0%, stored AV synchrony 68.0% without significant difference between the various devices, treadmill exercise testing 58.8%, and 12-lead ECG recording 21.3%. In one patient, atrial undersensing was exclusively detected by exercise testing. In conclusion, autodiagnostic pacemaker features facilitate the evaluation of atrial sensing performance. However, to exclude intermittent atrial malsensing, routine Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise are still needed .     

Atrioventricular Interval Optimization in the Right Atrial Appendage and Interatrial Septum Pacing: A Comparison Between Echo and Peak Endocardial Acceleration Measurements

PADELETTI, et al. : Atrioventricular Interval Optimization in the Right Atrial Appendage and Interatrial Septum Pacing: A Comparison Between ECHC and Peak Endocardial Acceleration. Interatrial septum pacing (IASP) reduces interatrial conduction time and consequently may interfere with atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization. We studied 14 patients with an implanted BEST Living system device able to measure peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) signal. The aims of our study were to compare the (1) optimal AVD (OAVD) in right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP) and IASP, and (2) OAVD derived by the PEA signal versus OAVD derived by Echo/Doppler evaluation of the left ventricular filling time (LVFT) and cardiac output (CO). Measurements were performed in DDD VDD modes Eight patients (group A) had RAAP and six patients (group B) had IASP. In group A, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 185 ± 23 ms , 177 ± 19 ms , and 192 ± 23 ms in DDD and 147 ± 19 ms , 135 ± 27 ms , and 146 ± 20 ms in VDD, respectively. OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was significantly longer in DDD mode than in VDD (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001 ). In group B, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 116 ± 19 ms , 113 ± 10 ms , and 130 ± 30ms in DDD and 106 ± 16 ms , 96 ± 15 ms , and 108 ± 26 ms in VDD, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between DDD and VDD. Significant correlations between OAVDs PEA derived and OAVDs LVFT and CO derived were observed (r = 0.71, r = 0.69, respectively ). When new techniques of atrial stimulation, as IASP, are used an OAVD shorter and similar in VDD and DDD has to be considered. The BEST Living system could provide a valid method to ensure, in every moment, the exact required OAVD to maximize atrial contribution to CO.     

Nonphysiological Left Heart AV Intervals as a Result of DDD and AAI "Physiological" Pacing

DDD and AAI pacemakers are considered physiological, since they preserve atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. Artificial pacing, however, is performed largely from right heart chambers, causing aberrant depolarization pathways. Pacing at the right atrial appendage (RAP) is known to delay left atrial contraction due to interatrial conduction time (IACT), and right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (RVP) delays left ventricular (LV) contraction due to interventricular conduction time (TVCT). These delays may render the left heart AV intervals (LAV) either too short or too Jong, thus affecting LV systolic function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the actual LAV intervals during conventional, right heart AAI and DDD pacing. Resulting LAV intervals were compared to programmed AV values during all DDD pacing modalities. Ten patients with DDD and six patients with AAI pacemakers were studied. IACT was measured from the atrial spike to the onset of left P wave, as recorded by an esophageal lead. Systolic time intervals were measured using either a carotid pulse tracing or a densitogram (photoplethysmography). LV function was appraised by measuring rate-corrected LV ejection time (LVETc). IVCT was measured indirectly as the lengthening of LV preelection period (PEPJ caused by RV pacing, as compared to normal depolarization pathway. Intrinsic‘ACT and IVCT were considered zero. Right heart AV intervals (RAV) were measured from surface ECG and LAVs were calculated according to the following equations: Sinus Rhythm: LAV = RAV; Atrial Pace 4- Ventricular Sense: LAV= RAV ? IACT; Atrial Sense + Ventricular Pace: LAV = RAV + IVCT; Sequential AV Pace: LAV = RAV ? IACT + IVCT, Results: 1. IACT: mean = 73 msec, range: 35–130; IVCT: mean = 50 msec, range: 44–100. 2. Compared to RAVs, LAVs were either too short or too long (?130 to + 300 msec: P < 0.001 J in RAP 4- RVS and RAS + RVP. Conclusions: 1. LAV differed significantly from RAV during AP + VS and AS + VP. 2. “Physiological” RAV intervals in DDD and AAI may cause nonphysiological LAV, possibly affecting LV function. 3. IACT and IVCT should be accounted for when programming DDD PM to provide physiological LAV.     

Apparent P Wave Underselling in a DDD Pacemaker Post Exercise

Wencke-bach behavior of DDD pacemakers occurring when the P-P interval varies between the programmed upper rate interval and the total atrial refractory period is symmetrical in a sense that the pacemaker response during atrial rate acceleration is similar to the pacemaker response during atrial rate deceleration. This phenomenon can be observed in all patients with persistent AV block in whom a DDD pacemaker is implanted, during exercise testing when the spontaneous atrial rate exceeds the selected upper rate, i.e., the programmed upper rate interval. However, this phenomenon will not be observed in all patients with intermittent intact AV conduction during exercise. In this case report we describe a patient who showed an asymmetrical response during a bicycle exercise test. There was 1:1 atrial sensing ventricular pacing until the atrial rate exceeded the upper rate of 140 ppm, while atrial sensing was restored during recovery when the conducted sinus rhythm had decreased to 105 beats/min.     

Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction

Episodes of repetitive P wave undersensing have been described in dual chamber pacemakers due to automatic extension of the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). Pacemaker stimulation was completely inhibited despite the presence of adequate P waves. This study sought to determine whether cycles of repetitive P wave undersensing occur even in the absence of PVARP extension. Two-hundred fifty-five patients were investigated after DDD or VDD pacemaker implantation for intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. Forty-six episodes of repetitive atrial undersensing were found during 24-hour Holter ECG in nine patients. Pacemaker syndrome-like symptoms occurred. Episodes were elicited by atrial or ventricular premature contractions when (1) native AV conduction was present but considerably prolonged, (2) intrinsic sinus rate exceeded pacemaker intervention rate, and (3) native AV interval plus PVARP exceeded sinus cycle length. Programming of a particularly short AV interval and PVARP helped to reduce the incidence of repetitive P wave undersensing. Patients with dual chamber devices and prolonged native AV conduction are prone to develop episodes of output inhibition. Standard timing cycles may be inappropriate in these patients.     

Lack of Influence of Atrioventricular Delay on Stroke Volume at Rest in Patients with Complete Atrioventricular Block and Dual Chamber Pacing

Dual chamber pacing (DDD) maintains atrioventricular (AV) sequence; AV delay programmability modifies the relationship between atrial and ventricular contraction. To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of such a modification, ten patients with a DDD unit for complete AV block were studied by time-motion (M-mode) and Doppler echocardiography during inhibited ventricular pacing (VVI), atrial-triggered ventricular pacing (VDD) and atrioventricular sequential pacing (DVI) at different AV delay (90, 140, 190, 240 msec). A significant improvement in stroke volume (SV) (15%-20%, P less than 0.05) was seen during DDD versus VVI pacing; no changes, however, were observed in the same patient with different AV delay or during DVI versus VDD pacing. These data suggest that programming of AV delay does not affect systolic performance at rest; longer diastolic filling times recorded during DDD pacing with "short" AV delay (90-140 msec) do not seem to be a hemodynamically relevant epi-phenomenon of PM programming.     

Comparison of Intrinsic Versus Paced Ventricular Function

There is increasing evidence supporting the benefits of providing optimum AV delay in cardiac pacing, though controversy exists regarding its value and the benefits of intrinsic versus paced ventricular activation. This study compared various AV delays at rest in patients whose native AV delays were 200 msec. Only patients with DDD pacemakers who had intact AV conduction and normal ventricular activation were included in the study. Nine patients were studied. Methods: Ten studies were performed. Evaluation was done in AAI and DDD modes at paced heart rates of 60/min or as close as possible to the intrinsic heart rate if this was > 60/min. Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (COJ were measured. Results: When AV sequential pacing in the DDD mode with an optimum AV delay was compared to AAI pacing with a prolonged AV interval, the average optimum AV delay in the DDD mode was 157 msec and ranged from 125 to 175 msec. The average AV interval in the AAI mode was 245 msec and ranged from 212 to 300 msec. In the DDD mode, there was an overall significant improvement in CO of 11% and SV of 9%. Patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of > 220 msec showed an overall significant improvement in CO of 13% and SV of 11%. In patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of < 220 msec, an improvement in CO of 6% and SV of 4% was seen. Conclusions: (1) An optimum AV delay is an important component of hemodynamic performance; and (2) AV sequential pacing at rest with an optimum AV delay may provide better hemodynamic performance than atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction when native AV conduction is prolonged > 220 msec.     

Interatrial Conduction in Patients Undergoing AV Stimulation: Effects of Increasing Right Atrial Stimulation Rate

To evaluate the frequency of spontaneous or rate dependent interatrial blocks, the interatrial conduction time (IACT) was studied on 100 consecutive patients (mean age 78.3 ±7.8 years) during a transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant. The spontaneous interatrial conduction time (SIACT) was measured from the intrinsic deflection (ID) of the unipolar right atrial signal to the ID of the left atrial signal recorded in a bipoiar way by an esophageal lead. The paced interatrial conduction time (PIACT) was measured from the stimulus artifact to the left atrial ID, when the atrium was paced at a slightly higher rate than the spontaneous rate and during incremental atrial pacing. From these measurements, the maximum increase ofPIACT (MIPIACT) was deduced. In this elderly population, the PIACT was similar (117 ± 26.9 msec) to the data in the literature. However, there were large interindividual variations that were also found in SIACT. We found a close correlation between SIACT and PIACT (P < 0.0001). PIACT was on average 50 msec longer than SIACT. SIACT increased with age (P < 0.03). The MIPIACT was 15.3 ± 15.2 msec. In the majority of patients, the MIPIACT was > 10 msec, and even reached 90 msec in one patient. MIPIACT was longer in patients with a PIACT exceeding 110 msec (P < 0.004). Based on IACT alone, the AV interval must be lengthened on average by 50 msec when changing from atrial tracking-ventricular pacing to atrial pacing-ventricular pacing, but large individual differences must be kept in mind. Elderly people should probably have a longer AV delay.     

Atrial Septal Pacing: A Method for Pacing Both Atria Simuhaneously

By pacing both atria simultaneously, one could reliably predict and optimize left-sided AV timing without concern for IACT. With synchronous depolarization of the atria, reentrant arrhythmias might be suppressed. We studied four male patients (73 ± 3 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias using TEE and fluoroscopy as guides; a standard active fixation screw-in lead (Medtronic model #4058) was attached to the interatrial septum and a standard tined lead was placed in the ventricle. The generators were Medtronic model 7960. The baseline ECG was compared to the paced ECG and the conduction time were measured to the high right atrium, distal coronary sinus and atrial septum in normal sinus rhytbm, atrial septal pacing, and AAT pacing. On the surface ECG, no acceleration or delay in A V conduction was noted during AAI pacing from the interatrial septum as compared with normal sinus rhythm. The mean interatrial conduction time for all 4 patients was 106 ± 2 ms; the interatrial conduction time measured during AAT pacing utilizing the atrial septal pacing lead was 97 ± 4 ms (P = NS). During atrial septal pacing, the mean conduction time to the high right atrium was 53 ± 2 ms. The mean conduction time to the lateral left atrium during atrial septal pacing, was likewise 53 ± 2 ms. We conclude that it is possible to pace both atria simultaneously from a single site using a standard active fixation lead guided by TEE and fluoroscopy. Such a pacing system allows accurate timing of the left-sided AV delay.     

Interatrial conduction correlates with optimal atrioventricular timing in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

Background: Echocardiographic optimization of the atrioventricular delay (AV) may result in improvement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Optimal AV has been shown to correlate with interatrial conduction time (IACT) during right atrial pacing. This study aimed to prospectively validate the correlation at different paced heart rates and examine it during sinus rhythm (Sinus). Methods: An electrophysiology catheter was placed in the coronary sinus (CS) during CRT implant (n = 33). IACT was measured during Sinus and atrial pacing at 5 beats per minute (bpm) and 20 bpm above the sinus rate as the interval from atrial sensing or pacing to the beginning of the left atrial activation in the CS electrogram. P‐wave duration (PWd) was measured from 12‐lead surface electrocardiogram, and the interval from the right atrial to intrinsic right ventricular activation (RA‐RV) was measured from device electrograms. Within 3 weeks after the implant patients underwent echocardiographic optimization of the sensed and paced AVs by the mitral inflow method. Results: Optimal sensed and paced AVs were 129 ± 19 ms and 175 ± 24 ms, respectively, and correlated with IACT during Sinus (R = 0.76, P < 0.0001) and atrial pacing (R = 0.75, P < 0.0001), respectively. They also moderately correlated with PWd (R = 0.60, P = 0.0003 during Sinus and R = 0.66, P < 0.0001 during atrial pacing) and RA‐RV interval (R = 0.47, P = 0.009 during Sinus and R = 0.66, P < 0.0001 during atrial pacing). The electrical intervals were prolonged by the increased atrial pacing rate. Conclusion: IACT is a critical determinant of the optimal AV for CRT programming. Heart rate‐dependent AV shortening may not be appropriate for CRT patients during atrial pacing. (PACE 2011; 34:443–449)     

Rate Adaptive Atrial Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome

In 42 patients (26 men, 16 women; mean age 69 ± 10 years), who were paced and medicated with antiarrhythmic drugs for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome, chronotropic response and AV conduction with rapid atrial pacing during exercise were studied. Patients were included if they had no second- or third-degree AV block, no complete bundle branch or bifascicular block, and a PQ interval ≤ 240 ms during sinus rhythm at rest. The interval between the atrial spike and the following Q wave (SQ) was measured in the supine position at rest with an AAI pacing rate of 5 beats/min above the sinus rate (SQ-R+5), and at the end of exercise with 110 beats/min (SQ-E110). Bicycle ergometry was performed using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol with the pacemakers being programmed to AAI with a fixed rate of 60 beats/min. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as peak exercise heart rate: (1) < 100 beats/min; (2) < 75% of the maximum predicted heart rate; or (3) the heart rate at half the maximum workload < 60 + 2 beats/min per mL O₂/kg per minute (calculated O₂ consumption). During exercise, one patient developed atrial fibrillation. Chronotropic incompetence was present in 71 % (29/41) of the patients according to definition 2, and in 76% (31/41) according to definition 1 or 3. Ten out of 41 patients (24%) exhibited a second-degree AV block with atrial pacing at 110 beats/min at the end of exercise. Only 9 out of the remaining 31 patients (29%) showed a physiological adaptation of the SQ-E110, and 21 patients (68%) exhibited a paradoxical increase of the SQ interval with rapid atrial pacing at the end of exercise as compared to the SQ-R+5. These observations indicate that the pacing system to be used in most patients paced and medicated for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome should be dual chamber, and the option of rate adaptation should be considered.     

AV junctional ablation allowing more effective delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intra- and interatrial conduction delay

We report two patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and evidence of refractory heart failure in whom impaired intraatrial conduction in one patient, and interatrial conduction in the other, prohibited optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) timing sequence. The patient with intraatrial conduction delay exhibited late right atrial sensing and latency during right atrial pacing that required programming of a short-sensed AV delay and long-paced AV delay (wide differential AV delay). In both patients AV junctional ablation and echocardiography-guided device optimization significantly improved heart failure.