Luteal start of exogenous FSH in poor responder women

Purpose To compare the effectiveness of using recFSH commenced in the luteal phase with a long GnRH agonist protocol or in the early follicular phase with a short GnRH agonist protocol, in infertile women designated as poor responders undergoing treatment with assisted reproduction in a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Materials and methods Forty-two couples undergoing an ICSI cycle of whom female partner diagnosed as poor responder were included in the study. Recombinant FSH was given daily from day 21 of the previous cycle upon initiation of GnRH agonist in the study group. Control group was given FSH on day 2 in a short protocol GnRH agonist regimen. The number of metaphase 2 oocytes was analysed as the main outcome measure; pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate were secondary outcome measures. Results Patients in the study group had significantly higher number of metaphase 2 oocytes. Although not statistically significantly patients in the study group had higher pregnancy/clinical pregnancy rates, as well. Conclusion This preliminary study shows that luteal start of recFSH simultaneously with long protocol GnRH agonist in poor responder women produced better results comparing to short protocol GnRH agonist plus high dose FSH regimen. Capsule: Luteal administration of recFSH along with GnRHa in poor responder women in an ART cycle increases metaphase 2 oocyte number significantly comparing to GnRHa flare-up protocol     

The dynamics of endometrial growth and the triple layer appearance in three different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and their influence on IVF outcomes

The impact of endometrial growth to the triple layer, endometrial thickness, and echogenicity on IVF outcomes was investigated in the study. A retrospective analysis of 583 ICSI patients was conducted: 385 with a long GnRH agonist protocol, 114 with a short GnRH agonist, and 84 with a GnRH antagonist protocol. The progression of endometrial growth to the appearance of the triple layer, endometrial thickness, and echogenicity was compared between protocols. At least one high quality blastocyst was transferred in a double embryo transfer. The time of the appearance of the endometrial triple layer was statistically significant for the pregnancy rate only in the GnRH antagonist protocol. The endometrial thickness on the day of the appearance of the triple layer had a statistically significant influence on the pregnancy rate in the GnRH antagonist and in the long GnRH agonist protocols. The highest pregnancy rate for the long GnRH agonist and the GnRH antagonist protocols was observed when the endometrium thickness was 12–13?mm (61.6% and 58.8%, respectively). The endometrial echogenicity had a significant influence on the pregnancy rate only in the long GnRH agonist protocol. Endometrial features could be helpful parameters in IVF outcomes in particular controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols.     

Antagonist rescue of agonist IVF cycle at risk of OHSS: a case series

We describe a series of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) long protocol cycles presenting a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which were rescued with an antagonist at a university-based tertiary-care fertility centre. Nineteen IVF patients presenting a risk of OHSS during treatment with long protocol, between 2009 and November 2012 were included in the present study. After discussion of available options, the agonist was stopped and a daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist injection was initiated (“rescue protocol”) and maintained until ovulation trigger. Fourteen patients were triggered with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and five with GnRH agonist bolus, yielding competent oocytes. Seventeen embryo transfers were performed in the fresh cycles. One patient developed moderate OHSS. There were eight clinical pregnancies after the fresh IVF cycle (42% per patient), and six further pregnancies after frozen-thawed cycles, resulting in a 73% cumulative clinical pregnancy rate within one year. We conclude that the “rescue protocol with antagonist” of the long IVF cycle with a high risk of OHSS allows us to carry on with the cycle, without compromising its success or the patient safety, thus broadening the possibility of applying the long protocol.     

Embryonic early-cleavage rate is decreased with aging in GnRH agonist but not inantagonist protocols

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between embryonic early-cleavage status and the age of patients receiving either a GnRH agonist long protocol or a GnRH antagonist protocol.

Methods

This retrospective study included 534 patients undergoing a fresh cycle of oocyte retrieval and day-3 embryo transfer. Of the 534 patients treated, 331 received a GnRH agonist long stimulation protocol (GnRH agonist group) for ovarian stimulation and 203 patients received a GnRH antagonist protocol (GnRH antagonist group).

Results

By logistic regression analysis, the rate of embryonic early-cleavage was significantly decreased with increasing age of women in the agonist (P < 0.001) but not in antagonist groups (P = 0.61). Based on the results of this study, maternal age is a critical factor for embryonic early-cleavage in agonist protocol but not in antagonist protocol. The results also showed that early-cleavage embryos were of better quality and resulted in a higher pregnancy rate than late-cleavage embryos in the GnRH agonist group. However, embryo quality and pregnancy rate was not significantly different between early and late cleavage embryos in the GnRH antagonist group.

Conclusions

We conclude that embryonic early-cleavage status is negatively correlated with aging in women receiving GnRH agonist long down-regulation but not in GnRH antagonist protocols. We also conclude that early cleavage of the zygote is not a reliable predictor for pregnancy potential using the GnRH antagonist protocol.     

Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments

This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol (n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol (n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 +/- 184 versus US$795 +/- 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.     

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception: a Cochrane review

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists suppress gonadotrophin secretion resulting in dramatic reduction in treatment cycle duration. Assuming comparable clinical outcomes, these benefits may justify changing the standard long GnRH agonist protocol to GnRH antagonist regimens. To evaluate the evidence, databases (e.g. Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were electronically searched, hand searches were performed, and manufacturers in the field were contacted. Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCT) fulfilled inclusion criteria for comparison of GnRH antagonist with long GnRH agonist protocol. Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate were significantly lower in the antagonist group (P = 0.009; OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95 and P = 0.02; OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.97 respectively). Conversely, incidence of severe OHSS was significantly reduced with the antagonist protocol (P = 0.01; OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.88), and interventions to prevent OHSS were administered more frequently in the agonist group (P = 0.03; OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.92). Concluding, GnRH antagonist protocols are short, simple, with good clinical outcomes and significant reduction in severe OHSS incidence and gonadotrophin amount; however, the lower pregnancy rate compared with the GnRH agonist long protocol necessitates counselling subfertile couples before recommending change from GnRH agonist to antagonist.     

不同预处理促性腺激素拮抗剂方案在超促排卵中应用的临床分析

目的:探讨如何在体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期中更有效地运用拮抗剂方案。方法:回顾性分析319个使用拮抗剂方案进行IVF-ET无输卵管积液、无内膜息肉及无子宫解剖结构异常的新鲜移植周期。根据拮抗剂治疗前使用短效激动剂(n=125,A组)、口服避孕药(达英-35)(n=113,B组)和未处理组(n=81,C组)分组,比较各组患者的年龄、促性腺激素(Gn)使用天数和剂量、注射hCG日LH和E2水平、获卵数、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率等。同时以261个促性腺激素激动剂长方案移植周期为对照组(D组)作进一步对比。结果:C组年龄(32.9±4.8岁)较其它组年龄明显偏大,P<0.05;A和B组Gn使用剂量大于C组,其中A组明显增多(P<0.01);A和B组hCG注射日LH水平均较C组明显低,其中A组LH值最低(P<0.01);A组获卵数最多(P<0.05);B组子宫内膜最薄(P<0.01)。3组的受精率、优质胚胎率均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。A组、B组和C组临床妊娠率分别为:32.8%、17.7%和37.0%,B组临床妊娠率显著低于A、C组(P<0.01)。C组、D组间临床妊娠率比较无统计学差异(37.0%vs 40.2%,P>0.05);C组Gn使用的时间和剂量均比D组明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:在IVF-ET中GnRH拮抗剂治疗前使用达必佳预处理未能提高妊娠率,使用过达因-35避孕的患者妊娠率明显下降,而未使用任何药物的患者接受GnRH拮抗剂超促排卵方案,能获得比较好的临床结局。     

Comparable effectiveness using flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) and single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for IVF cycles--a prospective, randomized study

This prospective randomized study compared the effectiveness of a flexible single-dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (cetrorelix) and a single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. All patients from the waiting list were successively included in the study, pre-programmed with an oral contraceptive, and randomized into goserelin and cetrorelix groups. Depending on the date on which their menstrual period started, patients took oral contraceptives for one or two cycles. Ultimately, 236 patients in the first group received a single dose of depot preparation of goserelin and 224 patients received a single 3 mg dose of cetrorelix in the late follicular phase, when the mean follicle diameter exceeded 12 mm. The mean number of ampoules of FSH and the duration of stimulation was statistically significantly lower in the cetrorelix group than in the goserelin group (25.9 versus 34.5, and 9.6 versus 12.2 days, P < 0.01). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was similar (6.7 +/- 4.5 versus 7.2 +/- 4.6, NS). Similar results were observed in fertilization rates, blastulation rates and blastocyst transfer rates in both groups. Clinical pregnancy and delivery rates per cycle were higher in the goserelin group (34.3 and 30.1%) than in the cetrorelix group (31.9 and 28.3%), but the differences were not statistically significant. The flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is an advantageous alternative to the long GnRH agonist protocol, with similar efficacy, shorter duration, a significant reduction in the number of FSH ampoules used and without the menopause-like effects of the GnRH antagonist.     

Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF: A retrospective study

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of different stimulation protocols on pregnancy outcomes in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of four different protocols including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (long, short and miniflare) and GnRH antagonist on pregnancy outcomes in poor responders. This investigation was performed on 566 poor respond patients who were candidates for IVF. Main outcome measures included the total number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, implantation and overall cancellation rates which were compared between four mentioned groups. Results: Number of follicles >18?mm on hCG day were significantly higher in GnRH-a long versus GnRH antagonist, GnRH-a short and GnRH-a miniflare protocols. The mean number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in GnRH-a long versus miniflare (4.7?±?3.05 versus 3.26?±?2.9 and 3.69?±?3.1 versus 2.65?±?2.2, respectively). There were no significant differences in implantation, pregnancy and overall cancellation rates between four groups. Conclusion: The present study suggests that the application of four different protocols in poor respond patients seem to have similar efficacy in improving clinical outcomes such as implantation, pregnancy rates and cancellation rate even though GnRH-a long protocol yielded more retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes compared to GnRH-a miniflare protocol.     

GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in comparison with the standard long protocol in poor-responder patients. Sixty patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 30) was stimulated with a standard long protocol, and group B (n = 30) received GnRH antagonist. Vaginal ultrasound was performed to evaluate ovarian response. There was a significantly reduced duration of ovarian stimulation (9.8 +/- 0.8 versus 14.6 +/- 1.2, P = 0.001) in group B in comparison with group A, and a reduced number of ampoules was used in group B (49.3 +/- 4.3 versus 72.6 +/- 6.8, P = 0.0001). In group B, the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher than in group A (5.6 +/- 1.6 versus 4.3 +/- 2.2, P = 0.02) and there was an increased number of follicles with a diameter >15 mm at human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in group B (P = 0.0001). Fewer cycles were cancelled with the use of an antagonist protocol. Five pregnancies (17% for embryo transfer) were obtained with GnRH antagonist protocol and two (7% for embryo transfer) with GnRH agonist protocol.     

Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with human pronuclear stage oocytes obtained by the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, and GnRH agonists

This retrospective study was performed to examine the implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes obtained with the use of a GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix (Cetrotide((R)) ASTA-Medica, Frankfurt/M, Germany) used in a multidose protocol with hMG, and to compare these results with those obtained after a conventional long GnRH analogue protocol (Decapeptyl-Depot, Ferring, Kiel, Germany). The study population consisted of 31 infertile couples with frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes after ICSI treatment using the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix (Cetrorelix((R))) and 31 infertile couples with frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes after ICSI treatment using the long GnRH analogue protocol. Patients underwent ICSI after down regulation with a GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl) and stimulation with hMG, or a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) and hMG. The supernumerary pronuclear stage oocytes were cryopreserved and transferred in a later mildly stimulated cycle. The implantation and pregnancy rates for frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes derived from the GnRH antagonist compared with the GnRH agonist were 3.26% versus 3.73% (P=1.0000) and 8.33% versus 10.25% (P=1.0000), respectively. To our knowledge we report here the first pregnancies obtained by the transfer of cryopreserved pronuclear stage embryos generated from ICSI using a GnRH antagonist in the collecting cycle. The use of Cetrorelix in a multiple dose protocol in combination with hMG does not demonstrate a negative effect on viability, implantation potential or pregnancy outcome as compared to 2PN conceptuses obtained from a long GnRH agonist-hMG protocol.     

Efficiency of follicle-stimulating hormone, commenced in the luteal phase, for overcoming a poor response in assisted reproduction

Aim:  The efficacy of commencement of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) during the luteal phase in the long-protocol gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist regimen in poor responders was compared with the conventional protocol in a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Methods:  Forty-two women who responded poorly to previous conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation were included in the study. Recombinant FSH (150 IU) was started simultaneously with the GnRH agonist long protocol in the study group. The control group was started recFSH on Day 2 of menstruation in the long-protocol GnRH agonist regimen. The number of metaphase (M) II oocytes, the number of embryos transferred, and the pregnancy rate were analyzed as main outcome measures.
Results:  Patients in the study group had a higher number of MII oocytes compared with the control group (6.8 vs 3.2, respectively; P  < 0.005), received a higher number of embryos (2.7 vs 1.2, respectively; P  < 0.05), and had higher pregnancy rates (38% vs 15%, respectively; P  < 0.005).
Conclusions:  Commencement of recFSH during the luteal phase simultaneously with the long-protocol GnRH agonist regiment in poor responder women produces better results compared with the conventional long-protocol GnRH agonist plus high-dose recFSH regimen.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist 'Cetrorelix' in poor responders comparing with the standard long protocol. DESIGN: The study population consisted of 21 poor responders who underwent ICSI and treated with Cetrorelix according to the multiple-dose protocol and who were compared with 21 poor responders treated according to the long protocol and who also underwent ICSI. Patients in both groups were matched for chronological age, the number of follicles found by ultrasound at the retrieval day and cause of infertility. Fifteen patients of GnRH antagonist group were treated with the combination of GnRH antagonist with clomiphene citrate (CC) plus gonadotropins, while six patients were treated with the combination of GnRH antagonist plus gonadotropins, but without CC. RESULTS: The use of GnRH antagonist in a multiple dose protocol gave a pregnancy rate of 14.28% which was in the range expected for patient with poor response, but with shorter treatment duration and with fewer ampoules of gonadotropins as compared with the use of a GnRH agonist protocol in a depot formulation. Within Cetrorelix group patients who received CC had a significant shorter duration of stimulation and needed fewer ampoules as compared with patients in the same group who did not receive CC. CONCLUSIONS: A GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol may be the protocol of choice for the treatment of poor responders. The use of GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix ended with significantly less ampoules of gonadotropins and a shorter duration of stimulation.     

GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor IVF responders: a randomized clinical trial

Objective

To compare the efficacy of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols in IVF poor responders.

Study design

This was a randomized controlled trial performed in the Iakentro IVF centre, Thessaloniki, from January 2007 to December 2011, concerning women characterised as poor responders after having 0–4 oocytes retrieved at a previous IVF cycle. They were assigned at random, using sealed envelopes, to either a long GnRH agonist protocol (group I) or a GnRH antagonist protocol (group II).

Results

Overall 364 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the two groups: finally 330 participated in our trial. Of these, 162 were treated with the long GnRH agonist protocol (group I), and 168 with the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol (group II). Numbers of embryos transferred and implantation rates were similar between the two groups (P = NS). The overall cancellation rate was higher in the antagonist group compared to the agonist group, but the difference was not significant (22.15% vs. 15.2%, P = NS). Although clinical pregnancy rates per transfer cycle were not different between the two groups (42.3% vs. 33.1%, P = NS), the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated was significantly higher in the agonist compared to the antagonist group (35.8% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Although long GnRH agonist and fixed GnRH antagonist protocols seem to have comparable pregnancy rates per transfer in poor responders undergoing IVF, the higher cancellation rate observed in the antagonist group suggests the long GnRH agonist protocol as the first choice for ovarian stimulation in these patients.     

GnRHa flare and IVF pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES: GnRH agonist administered early in the menstrual cycle (flare) causes an endogenous discharge of FSH and LH. Flare has been used in conjunction with gonadotropin ovarian stimulation for IVF 'poor responders'. There is an ongoing controversy regarding whether flare protocols improve pregnancy rates in 'poor responders'. The current study was designed to compare a GnRHa flare protocol with long suppression GnRHa IVF in 'poor responders'. METHODS: Seventy-three newly diagnosed poor responders who failed long GnRHa suppression IVF attempts were compared retrospectively with 128 age-matched IVF patients previously known poor ovarian responders treated with a long GnRHa suppression protocol. 'Poor responders' consisted of patients with peak E(2) less than 1000 pg/ml and/or less than five mature follicles with diameter >15 mm on the day of hCG administration. Student's t-test was used to analyze the data and the chi-squared test was used to compare fertilization and pregnancy rates. RESULTS: The flare protocol produced higher peak E(2) levels (1647+/-747 vs. 720+/-258 mIU/ml, P<0.05) and a larger number of mature follicles (5.8+/-2.2 vs. 4.0+/-1.0 P<0.05) in the study vs. the control group. A 30% pregnancy rate was achieved during this second IVF attempt using GnRHa flare protocol in the study group vs. 37 in the control group (P>0.05, NS). CONCLUSIONS: A comparison between the flare protocol group and the age-matched control group of poor ovarian responders subject to down regulation protocol, revealed higher peak E(2) levels and more mature follicles, respectively. However, both groups yielded comparable pregnancy rates. The use of high dose gonadotropin treatment in our study groups seems to be the only explanation for their subsequent successful outcome. We concluded that GnRH agonist flare protocol does not result in better IVF outcome compared with long GnRH agonist suppression protocol in IVF poor responders.     

改良GnRH-a长方案在控制性促排卵中的应用

目的探讨改良GnRH—a/FSH/hMG联合长方案在控制性促排卵中的应用以及国产阿拉瑞林在此方案中的使用。方法以回顾性分析的方法对174例改良GnRH-a长方案和48例超短方案控制性促排卵的资料进行回顾性分析。结果 改良GnRH—a/FSH/hMG联合长方案在FSH/hMG用药天数、用药量、取卵数、移植数、冻存胚胎数、hCG丑内膜厚度、临床妊娠率、种植率、流产率、OHSS发生率等方面与短方案组相比差异均无显著性(P>0.05),其中流产率明显低于超短方案组。结论改良国产阿拉瑞林/FSH/hMG联合长方案是一种简单、经济、有效的控制性促排卵方案,值得在IVF—ET周期中推广。     

An ethanolic extract of Linum usitatissimum caused cell lethality and inhibition of cell vitality/ - proliferation of MCF-7 and BT20 mamma carcinoma cells in vitro

Purpose

This study aims to verify if luteal estradiol pre-treatment improves IVF/ICSI outcomes in a GnRH antagonist protocol as compared with a micro dose GnRH agonist protocol in poor-responding patients.

Methods

A total of 116 IVF/ICSI cycles were included in this prospective randomized single blind clinical trial. The selected women were randomly assigned to receive an estradiol pre-treatment in a GnRH antagonist protocol (daily oral Estradiol Valerate 4 mg preceding the IVF cycle from the 21st day until the first day of the next cycle) or in oral contraceptive pill micro dose GnRH agonist protocol.

Results

The patients in the luteal estradiol protocol required more days of stimulation (10.9 ± 1.6 vs. 10.2 ± 1.8) and a greater gonadotropin requirement (3,247.8 ± 634.6 vs. 2,994.8 ± 611 IU), yet similar numbers of oocytes were retrieved and fertilized. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the implantation rates (9.8 vs. 7.9 %) and the clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (16.3 vs. 15.6 %).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the use of estradiol during a preceding luteal phase in a GnRH antagonist protocol can provide similar IVF outcomes when compared to a micro dose GnRH agonist protocol.     

Reproductive outcome using a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) for luteolysis and follicular synchronization in poor responder IVF/ICSI patients treated with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol

To investigate the possible beneficial effect of a new stimulation protocol (termed 'CRASH') on the outcome of poor responder patients, a multicentre, prospective longitudinal study including a total of 36 women undergoing 72 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with patients serving as their own controls, was conducted. A poor responder patient was defined as a patient with four or fewer oocytes extracted from five or fewer follicles and with a total FSH consumption exceeding 2000 IU in a preceding long agonist down-regulation protocol. The CRASH protocol included 3 mg of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cetrorelix given in the late luteal phase on cycle day 23. Stimulation with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) started on cycle day 2, followed by a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The results showed significantly more follicles (5.4 versus 3.5), oocytes (4.3 versus 2.4) and transferable embryos (1.8 versus 0.8) with the CRASH protocol as compared with the preceding long protocol (P < 0.005 in all cases). The implantation rate and pregnancy rate per transfer was 18.4 and 38.5% respectively, approaching the clinical outcome of normal responder patients. The CRASH protocol thus may constitute an attractive alternative to conventional protocols for low responder patients, improving their clinical outcome.     

Combined modalities for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following an excessive response to stimulation

Although the classification and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) are well described in the literature, little attention has been given to modalities that aim to prevent its occurrence. In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate whether a combination of modalities in addition to GnRH agonist triggering in GnRH antagonist cycles could result in better prevention of OHSS. The study included 170 hyperresponder patients who were stimulated with GnRH antagonist protocol and were triggered with GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation. Freeze all embryos was performed in all patients. The intervention group included treatment with dopamine agonist and restarting the GnRH antagonist. Of the 170 patients included, 63 were included in the intervention group. Compared to no intervention, women in the intervention group were more likely to have: menses within 7?days of the oocyte retrieval, smaller ovarian diameter, the absence of free pelvic fluid, less hemoconcentration and higher serum sodium levels. It can be concluded that combining other modalities in addition to triggering with GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist cycles, results in targeting several pathways that lead to OHSS and result in rapid resolution of signs of ovarian hyperstimulation.     

In vitro fertilization stimulation protocol for normal responder patients

The aim of this prospective observational study is to determine the different outcomes of IVF/ICSI treatments after using antagonists or agonists of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in normal responder patients. Two hundred forty-seven patients undergoing IVF treatment at the Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Rome (CERMER), from January 2005 to December 2008, were included in the study. Patients were stimulated either with a standard long protocol with GnRH agonists (n = 156) or with GnRH antagonists (n = 91). The use of GnRH antagonists resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of the stimulation (Agonist Group 14.10?±?2.25 vs Antagonist Group 11.34?±?2.11; p < 0.001) and in the amount of gonadotrophin (IU of r-FSH) needed (Agonist Group 1878?±?1109 vs Antagonist Group 1331?±?1049; p = 0.0014). Moreover a lower number of cycles were cancelled with the antagonist protocol (4.39 vs 6.41%). The GnRH antagonist protocol, when compared to the GnRH agonist one, is associated with a similar clinical pregnancy rate, similar implantation rate, significantly lower gonadotrophin requirement and shorter duration of stimulation. For this reason, GnRH antagonists might be a good treatment even for normal responder patients undergoing IVF.