The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the tensile bond strengths of two impression material systems (polysulphide and polyvinyl siloxane) to two custom tray materials [autopolymerizing and visible light-cured (VLC) acrylic resin]. The effect of polymerizing the tray materials directly against wax spacer and tin foil was evaluated for each material. Polymerizing tray materials against tin foil significantly increased the bond strengths of polysulphide and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to VLC and autopolymerizing acrylic resin tray materials. Polyvinyl siloxane VLC cured against tin foil combination produced the strongest bond. The VLC resin tray material generated greater bond strength than autopolymerizing acrylic resin when polymerized against tin foil.     

Pressure Produced on the Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge by Different Impression Materials and Tray Design: An In Vivo Study

Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.     

Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory stu

The aim of this preliminary laboratory study was to evaluate the effects of 5- and 25-degree implant angulations in simulated clinical casts on an impression's accuracy when using different impression materials and tray selections. A convenience sample of each implant angulation group was selected for both open and closed trays in combination with one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. The influence of material and technique appeared to be significant for both 5- and 25-degree angulations (P < .05), and increased angulation tended to decrease impression accuracy. The open-tray technique was more accurate with highly nonaxially oriented implants for the small sample size investigated.     

Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

This study examined the accuracy of stone casts produced from impressions taken in stock polycarbonate trays, some of which had been strengthened with autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin. Three techniques were used to make the impression of an acrylic master model of the mandibular arch on which two extracoronal preparations for bridgework and one intracoronal inlay preparation had been carried out. Each preparation had been indented with a reference point for later measurement. The impression material was a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane material. Five impressions were taken for each type of tray for each impression technique and these were cast in die-stone after 24 h. The distances between the points were measured with a reflex microscope and the means determined for each design of tray. The mean difference between casts produced from the various tray designs and the acrylic master model were determined for each of the distances between the three measuring points for the various impression techniques. Statistical analysis showed that, with the polycarbonate stock trays, there were significant differences between some of the modifications and between them and the acrylic model, for the three distances (P less than 0.05). These differences were limited to one measurement for one design of tray for each of the two-stage impression methods. With the one-stage technique the unreinforced tray and those reinforced with acrylic, over the heels and anteriorly, and the barred design were statistically significantly different from the acrylic model for measurement A-B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of Effect of Tray Space on the Accuracy of Condensation Silicone, Addition Silicone and Polyether Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study

Optimal thickness of impression materials in the custom tray in order to get the most accurate impression. To investigate the effect of different tray spacer thickness on the accuracy and the dimensional stability of impressions made from monophasic condensation silicone, addition silicone and polyether impression materials. Three different types of elastomeric monophasic impression materials were used for making the impression of a master die with tray having tray spacer thickness of 2, 4 and 6 mm. Each type of impression was poured in die stone after 1 h. Each cast was analyzed by a travelling microscope and compared with the master die. The data was tabulated and subjected to statistical evaluation. The results of the study indicated that the impressions made from 2 to 4 mm spaced trays produced more accurate stone casts when compared to 6 mm spaced tray. No statistical significant differences were observed between the accuracy and dimensional stability of the three materials tested. Minimum changes were observed when the cast was poured after 1 h and the tray space was 2 mm for all the materials tested. It is therefore advisable not to exceed tray space of 2 mm.     

Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

The study examined the accuracy of stone casts produced from impressions taken in stock polycarbonate trays, some of which had been strengthened with autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin and four designs of custom-made trays. Impressions of an acrylic master model of the mandibular arch on which two extracoronal crown preparations and one intracoronal inlay preparation had been carried out were taken using a medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane material. Each preparation had been intended with a reference point for later measurement. Five impressions were taken for each type of tray and these were cast in die-stone after 24 h. The distances between the points were measured with a reflex microscope and the means determined for each design of tray. The mean difference between casts produced from the various tray designs and the acrylic master model were determined for each of the distances between the three measuring points. Statistical analysis showed that, with the stock trays, there were no significant differences between any of the modifications, or between them and the acrylic model, for any of the three distances (P greater than 0.1). When the results from the custom-made trays were analysed there were statistical differences between the acrylic model and the casts from the unperforated tray with no stops (P = 0.02), and between the unperforated tray with no stops and the perforated with stops for the distance A-B (P less than 0.01). There were no other significant differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Indirect composite restorations can be made in 1 appointment using a flexible die. Interactions between different impression materials and flexible die materials may affect the accuracy of fit and margin adaptation of the restoration. PURPOSE: This study compared the margin adaptation of composite inlays made using the following 5 impression/flexible die material combinations; condensation silicone/polyvinyl siloxane (CS/PVS), wash viscosity polyvinyl siloxane/medium or heavy viscosity polyvinyl siloxane (PVS/PVS), irreversible hydrocolloid impression/medium viscosity polyvinyl siloxane (IH/PVS), wash viscosity polyvinyl siloxane impression/polyether (PVS/PE), with composite inlays made using a control system of a wash viscosity polyvinyl siloxane impression and a type IV stone die. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each test and control system, 10 impressions were made of a class II composite inlay preparation in a metal master die. One die was made from each impression and one composite inlay was made and finished on each die (a total of 60 inlays). Inlays were placed on the master die and the margin opening at the buccal, distal, and gingival sites was recorded with a measuring microscope (x40 magnification). RESULTS: The overall mean +/- SD margin openings of inlays made from the systems were as follows: PVS wash/PVS heavy viscosity 149.5 +/- 107. 4 microm; PVS wash/PVS medium viscosity 87.4 +/- 63.0 microm; IH/PVS medium viscosity 76.7 +/- 48.9 microm; CS/PVS 73.3 +/- 48.7 microm, PVS wash viscosity/PE 64.0 +/- 44.3 microm, PVS wash viscosity/stone 53.9 +/- 48.3 microm. Composite inlays made using the PVS wash viscosity/PVS heavy viscosity system had significantly larger distal, gingival, and overall mean margin openings than all other inlays (ANOVA and Fisher PLSD test; P =.05). The separating medium required between some impression and die materials did not work consistently. Composite inlays fabricated on dies made of material different than the impression material had mean buccal, distal, gingival, and overall margin openings < or =100 microm. CONCLUSION: Composite inlays made on the CS/PVS, IH/PVS medium viscosity, PVS wash viscosity/PE flexible dies, and control PVS wash viscosity/stone dies had statistically similar (P =.05) mean buccal, distal, gingival, and overall mean margin openings that were < or =100 microm. Composite inlays made on dies that were made of the same type of material as the impression material (PVS/PVS) had mean gingival margin openings >100 microm that were significantly larger than all other systems tested (P =.05).     

Working Times and Dimensional Accuracy of the One-Step Putty/Wash Impression Technique

PURPOSE: Using the one-step polyvinyl siloxane impression technique, this study compared the effect of putty material working time on the dimensional accuracy of recovered improved stone casts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An acrylic resin master cast was fabricated with embedded reference points to enable both horizontal and vertical measurements. Four commercially available polyvinyl siloxane impression putties with light body washes were evaluated: 1) Extrude (Kerr), 2) Cutter (Coltere), 3) Express (3M), and 4) Reprosil (Caulk). Each putty was mixed by hand for 30 seconds, placed in a plastic stock tray, and seated on the master cast at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds after mixing (N = 100, n = 5). The impressions were poured in improved stone, and vertical and horizontal measurements were made to 0.001 mm between reference points on recovered casts using an optical traveling microscope. ANOVA (p < or = .05) was used to compare vertical and horizontal measurements to master cast dimensions. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found among casts for all materials and time periods tested. When horizontal measurement ranges were evaluated, Extrude casts exhibited the widest range of measurement, especially when the trays were seated at 90 and 120 seconds. When vertical measurement ranges were evaluated, Express casts at 120 seconds exhibited the widest range. CONCLUSIONS: A high range of variability in vertical and horizontal dimensions occurred at the later time periods, especially for Extrude and Express casts. As a result of rapid polymerization and poor flow properties of putty materials, the impression tray should be seated within 60 seconds after putty mixing to reduce dimensional variability of recovered casts.     

Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, in vitro, the effect of time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of open-tray implant impression copings made of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Reference models with 4 internal connection implants were fabricated. Four sets of 71 direct impressions were made with square impression copings using an open-tray technique. One set of impressions was made with polyether material (material A) and each of 3 polyvinyl siloxane materials (materials B, C, and D). Three-dimensional changes in spatial orientation of the implant analogs were measured over 48 hours using an optical measurement device. Deviation values were summed over 4 points and averaged per impression. Global differences were tested with a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean dimensional accuracy of implant impressions significantly differed over time (P < .001). Materials A and B were found to produce comparable results, For materials C and D there was a significant increase in deviations, with a maximum increase at 2 hours. Deviations for material C were comparable to materials A and B at 48 hours. Baseline values were not maintained by any material. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that time cannot be neglected as a factor affecting the accuracy of implant master casts.     

Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.

Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials have been shown to have excellent properties as impression materials; however, they are sensitive to manipulative variables. Several methods of using very high viscosity (putty) materials to form "trays" to obtain uniform bulk of the wash impression are described, and the disadvantages of each of these techniques is pointed out. It is recommended that for best results acrylic resin custom trays should be used routinely. The interaction of polyvinyl siloxane materials with latex products is also discussed and problems that this inhibition can cause are stated. Suggestions to avoid this interaction are outlined. One of the disadvantages of the impression materials is that it has a relatively short working time. Refrigerating the material will increase working time without affecting accuracy.     

Evaluation of Dimensional Stability and Accuracy of Autoclavable Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material

Dimensionally stable autoclavable impressions will be effective in controlling the cross-infection and contamination caused by patient’s saliva and other oral secretions. The accuracy of newly introduced autoclavable polyvinyl siloxane impression material was assessed for its dimensional stability and accuracy. A standard metal model (Dentoform, U-501, Columbia) was customised for impression making. The impressions were made using the newly introduced polyvinyl siloxane impression materials (AFFINIS, Coltene/Whaledent AG, 9450 Alstalten, Switzerland). Fifty impressions were made and were divided into two groups A and B of 25 each. Group A was the control sample (non-autoclaved impressions) and group B was the test sample (autoclaved impressions), which was subjected to the steam autoclave procedure at 134 °C for 18 min, casts were poured in type IV gypsum products. The customised metal model, casts obtained from control and test group were subjected to laboratory evaluation with help of a travelling microscope (×10 magnification), and digital vernier calliper (0.01 mm/10 μm accuracy). Data analysis was done using one-way ANOVA and One-Sample t test to evaluate the overall accuracy (P < 0.005). As a result, there was an average reduction of 0.016 μm in overall dimension between the test and the control group when compared with the master model, which is not statistically or clinically significant. The newly introduced polyvinyl siloxane impression material is accurate and dimensional stable for clinical use when steam autoclaved at 134 °C for 18 min.     

Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. There is much discussion in the dental literature concerning the effect of the impression technique on the accuracy of cast restorations. PURPOSE. This study assessed the accuracy of 3 putty-wash impression techniques using the same impression material (polyvinyl siloxane) in a laboratory model. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The 3 putty-wash impression techniques used were (1) 1-step (putty and wash impression materials used simultaneously); (2) 2-step with 2-mm relief (putty first as a preliminary impression to create 2-mm wash space with prefabricated copings. In the second step, the wash stage was carried out); and (3) 2-step technique with a polyethylene spacer (plastic spacer used with the putty impression first and then the wash stage). For each technique, 15 impressions were made of a stainless steel master model that contained 3 complete crown abutment preparations, which were used as the positive control. Accuracy was assessed by measuring 6 dimensions (intraabutment and interabutment) on stone dies poured from impressions of the master model. RESULTS. One-way analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences among the 3 putty-wash impression techniques, for all intraabutment and interabutment measurements (P <.001). Overall discrepancies of the 2-step technique with 2-mm relief putty-wash impression technique were significantly smaller than that in the 1-step and polyethylene putty-wash impression techniques. CONCLUSION. The polyvinyl siloxane 2-step, 2-mm, relief putty-wash impression technique was the most accurate for fabricating stone dies.     

Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of retraction cord medicaments (aluminum chloride, ferric sulfate, and ferric subsulfate/ferric sulfate) on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made of standardized metal dies (American Dental Association [ADA] specification No. 19) treated with 1 of the 3 retraction cord medicaments. Dimensional accuracy was evaluated by comparing the average length of a line in the impressions to the standard die. Surface detail reproduction was evaluated by viewing the impressions under low-angle illumination at x10 magnification. Reproduction was considered satisfactory if 2 of 3 horizontal lines were reproduced continuously. The dies were also evaluated under the microscope before the impression was made. RESULTS: The medicaments did not significantly effect the dimensional accuracy; mean shrinkage was within ADA guidelines in the treatment groups. All of the medicaments had an adverse effect on surface detail reproduction. These effects were statistically significant compared to the untreated control. CONCLUSION: Although the changes in dimensional accuracy were within ADA guidelines, the surface detail reproduction was modified such that the impression would be considered clinically unacceptable. For optimal results, care must taken to remove all traces of these retraction cord medicaments prior to recording of a polyvinyl siloxane impression.     

A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dual-arch trays are often used by the dentists to make crown impressions of opposing quadrants simultaneously. Metal and plastic trays are available, but little is known about the accuracy of the impressions and resultant working dies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a clinical trial to compare the accuracy of gypsum working dies made from impressions with metal dual-arch, plastic dual-arch, and complete-arch custom trays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients requiring a posterior single tooth implant restoration were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A customized abutment was measured in 3 dimensions (buccolingual, mesiodistal, and occlusogingival) by use of a measuring microscope. Three polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made of the abutment with a complete-arch custom tray, a plastic, and a metal dual-arch tray. Each impression was poured with type IV improved dental die stone. The diameter (buccolingual and mesiodistal), from gingivoaxial to gingivoaxial point angle, and height (occlusogingival), gingivoaxial to occlusoaxial point angle of the abutment standard was determined by measuring each dimension several times to obtain a mean. These 3 mean values served as the controls and were compared with the same measurements of the gypsum dies generated by the 3 different impression techniques. The patient was asked to rank the 3 impressions in order of overall comfort. A multivariate repeated measures single factor ANOVA was used in the statistical analysis (alpha=.05). When main effects were significant, a pairwise comparison of mean values was conducted with Bonferonni adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in die accuracy among the 3 trays for the mesiodistal (3.507 mm) and occlusogingival (3.584 mm) dimensions of the implant abutment. Dies were smaller than the standard for these 2 dimensions and larger in the buccolingual dimension. There was a significant difference in accuracy between the metal and plastic dual-arch trays. The dies produced from the metal dual-arch tray were 20 microm larger than the abutment standard compared with 3 microm larger for the plastic tray. The occlusogingival dimension of the working dies was 30 to 40 microm shorter than the implant abutment. Seven of the 8 patients ranked the plastic dual-arch impression as the most comfortable and the complete-arch custom tray as the least comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the dimensions of working dies from a custom tray impression did not differ significantly from those created with dual arch trays. However, working dies from a plastic dual-arch tray were more accurate buccolingually than those from metal dual-arch trays.     

Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the ability of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material (Affinis, Coltène/Whaledent, material A) to obtain final impressions free of bubbles and voids for indirect fixed cuspal-coverage restorations. The results were compared to a control polyvinyl siloxane impression material (material B). Both materials were handled by inexperienced clinicians (undergraduate dental students) in student clinics. METHOD AND MATERIALS: One-hundred and thirty patients who were treated in the Louisiana State University School of Dentistry Junior Student Clinic for indirect fixed cuspal-coverage restorations and who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either one of two treatment groups, group A (n = 65) or group B (n = 65). Two calibrated examiners evaluated the first impression of prepared posterior teeth at a magnification of 10x for acceptability (no voids or bubbles). Position of tooth, type of preparation, preparation finish line (Class I-V), and gingival bleeding scores were recorded. All statistical tests were performed with the level of significance set at .05. RESULTS: The Fisher-Freeman-Halton test did not reveal significant associations between material and gingival bleeding score (P = .492). Significant differences in the location of the preparation finish line between materials were observed (P = .0096); material A was more frequently used in cases where the preparation finish line was located at least 2 mm subgingivally. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of the material on the success of the impression (acceptable/ unacceptable). Material was highly significant in the logistic model (P < .001) with an odds in favor of an acceptable impression being eight times higher with material A than with material B (odds ratio = 8.00; 95% confidence index for odds ratio: 2.832, 22.601). The 60/65 (92.3%) impressions made with material A and 39/65 (60%) impressions made with material B were rated "acceptable." CONCLUSION: The new polyvinyl siloxane impression material provided a significantly higher proportion of impressions free of bubbles and voids than the control polyvinyl siloxane material.     

Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique

This study was aimed at investigating the internal adaptation of a ceramic (Ceramco II) and two composite resin inlay materials (SureFil and 3M Filtek Z 250) using silicon replica technique as an indicator. Forty-five standard mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared into brass moulds by using computer numerically controlled system. Inlays were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions with indirect methods. Replicas of the prepared cavities and inlays were produced with a polyvinyl siloxane material (Elite H-D). The spaces between inlays and cavities were filled by different coloured light-body polyvinyl siloxane material. Two parallel slices (mesio-distally) were obtained from the replicas with a sharp blade. Different coloured polyvinyl siloxane material thickness between cavity and inlay was measured at seven points (mesial, occlusal and distal). The data were evaluated with anova and Tukey's honestly significantly different (HSD) statistical tests. In the SureFil and Ceramco II groups, the sizes of the contraction gaps at mesial and distal gingival floors were greater than that of the occlusal marginal walls. In comparison of gap formation at occlusal regions, while the 3M composite group showed highest gap values (204.33 +/- 75.45 microm), the Ceramco II group revealed the lowest (141.17 +/- 23.66 microm) (P < 0.05). At the gingival floors, gap formation of Ceramco II group was the highest (227.08 +/- 51.95 microm). Neither the 3M Filtek Z250 nor SureFil group showed any statistical difference between gap values of their self-occlusal and gingival floors (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our results showed that ceramic inlays did not confer any big advantage for internal adaptation over the composite inlays.     

Biological evaluation of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the irritant properties of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material (Ghenesil, Lascod-Italy) after single application to intact skin of the rabbit. METHODS: The material was evaluated for primary skin irritation according to the UNI EN ISO 10993-10:1996 using three healthy male New Zealand White rabbits. The back of the animals was clipped free of fur and divided into four sites with the same area 24 h before application of the sample. The material was applied to only two sites; the other two were used as controls. All the sites were covered by gauze and the back of the rabbit was wrapped with a non-occlusive bandage. After 4 h, the bandage and the test material were removed; 1h later the sites were examined for skin irritation and the observation was repeated after 24, 48 and 72 h. The Score of Primary Irritation (SPI) was calculated for each animal and the Primary Irritation Index (PII) was calculated as the arithmetical mean of SPI values. RESULTS: The PII of the test material resulted 0.06. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on present results, it can be concluded that the primary skin irritation of the polyvinyl siloxane impression material tested can be considered negligible.     

Blockout technique for impressions of teeth with increased open gingival embrasures.

A dental technique is described that blocks out enlarged gingival embrasures to eliminate distortion of an impression and the resultant cast for removable partial or fixed partial dentures. This procedure consists of injecting polyvinyl siloxane impression material in embrasures to form custom blockout wedges. This technique provides a simple method for clean, customized blockout of potentially damaging undercuts that can distort impressions and casts. The ultimate accuracy of the cast results in a precise definitive prosthesis.     

Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays

ObjectivesTo compare the transfer accuracy of two different three-dimensional printed trays (Dreve FotoDent ITB [Dreve Dentamid, Unna, Germany] and NextDent Ortho ITB [NextDent, Soesterberg, the Netherlands]) to polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) trays for indirect bonding.Materials and MethodsA total of 10 dental models were constructed for each investigated material. Virtual bracket placement was performed on a scanned dental model using OnyxCeph (OnyxCeph 3D Lab, Chemnitz, Germany). Three-dimensional printed transfer trays using a digital light processing system three-dimensional printer and silicone transfer trays were produced. Bracket positions were scanned after the indirect bonding procedure. Linear and angular transfer errors were measured. Significant differences between mean transfer errors and frequency of clinically acceptable errors (<0.25 mm/1°) were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis and χ² tests, respectively.ResultsAll trays showed comparable accuracy of bracket placement. NextDent exhibited a significantly higher frequency of rotational error within the limit of 1° (P = .01) compared with the PVS tray. Although PVS showed significant differences between the tooth groups in all linear dimensions, Dreve exhibited a significant difference in the buccolingual direction only. All groups showed a similar distribution of directional bias.ConclusionsThree-dimensional printed trays achieved comparable results with the PVS trays in terms of bracket positioning accuracy. NextDent appears to be inferior compared with PVS regarding the frequency of clinically acceptable errors, whereas Dreve was found to be equal. The influence of tooth groups on the accuracy of bracket positioning may be reduced by using an appropriate three-dimensional printed transfer tray (Dreve).     

Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin

Statement of problem

Polyvinyl siloxane impression material has been widely used as a lingual matrix for rebuilding missing tooth structure with composite resin. The composite resin is light polymerized in contact with the polyvinyl siloxane impression material. However, polyvinyl siloxane impression material has been shown to interact with other dental materials.