Access to quality: evaluation of the allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation

Disparities in both access to the kidney transplant waiting list and waiting times for transplant candidates have been extensively documented with regard to ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic factors, and region. However, the issue of access to equivalent quality organs has garnered less attention. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether certain patient populations were more likely to receive lower quality organs. This was a retrospective cohort study of all deceased-donor adult renal transplant recipients in the United States from 1996 to 2002 (n = 45,832). Using previously reported categorization of donor quality (I to V), the propensity of transplant recipients to receive lower-quality kidneys in a cumulative logit model was evaluated. Older patients were progressively more likely to receive lower-quality organs (age > or = 65 yr, odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, P < 0.01) relative to recipients aged 18 to 24 yr. African American and Asian recipients had a greater likelihood of receiving lower-quality organs relative to non-Hispanic Caucasians. Regional allocation networks were highly variable with regard to donor quality. Neither recipient gender (OR = 1.00, P = 0.81) nor patient's primary diagnosis were associated with donor quality. Findings suggest that disparities in the quality of deceased donor kidneys to transplant recipients exist among certain patient groups that have previously documented access barriers. The extent to which these disparities are in line with broad policies of equity and potentially modifiable will have to be examined in the context of allocation policy.     

Dissemination of a novel organ perfusion technique: ex vivo normothermic perfusion of deceased donor kidneys

Ex vivo normothermic perfusion (EVNP) technology is a promising means of organ preservation, assessment, and preconditioning prior to kidney transplantation, which has been pioneered by a single group. We describe the challenges of setting up clinical EVNP programs in 2 new centers, as well as early patient outcomes. Governance, training, and logistical pathways are described. In order to demonstrate safety and proficiency in this new technique, early patient outcomes are also described. Patient outcomes included the incidence of primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, graft and patient survival at 1 year. Contralateral kidneys undergoing static cold storage alone were used as a comparator group. Between March 2016 and July 2017, EVNP was performed on 14 kidneys from 12 donors (11 kidneys in center 1, 3 kidneys in center 2). Of the 14 kidneys that underwent EVNP, 12 organs were implanted into 10 recipients. Two pairs of kidneys were implanted as dual grafts and 1 kidney was implanted simultaneously with a pancreas. The remaining 7 kidneys were transplanted as single allografts. Seven pairs of kidneys were available for paired analysis comparing EVNP versus static cold storage. Graft and patient outcomes were comparable between the 2 preservation techniques. The introduction of a clinical EVNP service requires a careful multimodal approach, drawing on the expertise of specialists in transplantation, hematology, and microbiology. Both new clinical EVNP programs demonstrated proficiency and safety when a structured dissemination process was followed.     

Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation

Hayashi PH, Axelrod DA, Galanko J, Salvalaggio PR, Schnitzler M. Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 156–163. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: We examined the UNOS database from 7/15/00‐7/17/05 for Regional deceased donor liver utilization. For each region, we performed logistic regression and derived odds ratios (OR) for donor characteristics associated with livers being transplanted outside of the region or not transplanted at all. Regions with smallest and least significant OR were considered aggressive users of suboptimal organs. We estimated how many untransplanted livers from less aggressive regions might be used by more aggressive regions. Only Region 9 was significantly more aggressive than others (median OR: 6 vs. 16; p < 0.01; median OR size: 1.4 vs. 3.6; p < 0.01). Region 9 transplanted at higher median Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (20.4 [6–73] vs. 18.3 [6–70], p < 0.01), but had the lowest one‐ and five‐yr graft survival (p < 0.01). Of 30 474 livers, 5056 were not transplanted, of which 3690 were procured outside Region 9 but met Region 9 use criteria. Of these, 1488 and 1807 livers had donor risk indices ≤ 2, for hypothetical 12 and 8 h cold ischemia time (CIT), respectively. Regional differences in liver utilization are profound. Region 9 is significantly more aggressive. At the most, 297–361 organs per year may have been used under Region 9’s use criteria but overall graft survival may have declined.     

Attitude toward living related donation of patients on the waiting list for a deceased donor solid organ transplant

INTRODUCTION: Spain is the country with the highest rate of donation from deceased individuals. However, given the deficit in organs, living donation is being encouraged. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward living donation among patients on the waiting list for a transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for a kidney or liver transplant (n = 96; 46 kidney and 50 liver) in the last year had their attitudes toward living donation evaluated through a psychosocial survey performed in a direct interview with an independent health professional from the transplant unit and analyzed by Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent were in favor of donating their organs when they die, 6% had doubts, and the remaining 3% were against it. Twenty percent would accept living donation from a family member (32% in liver vs 7% in kidney; P < .05), despite 89% of them accepting that there would be a risk to the family member. Twenty percent reported that a family member had suggested donating, but the patient was opposed. Finally, only 6% considered living donation to be their first choice, 42% did not consider this option. Up to 96% would donate an organ to a family member if they were requested to do so. CONCLUSION: Patients on the waiting list are not favorable to living related donation for themselves, although members of their family have proposed it to them. However, the liver patient is more prepared to accept it, possibly because that patient has no other alternative as do kidney patients have dialysis. Even so, they are favorable toward donating a living organ if a family member were to request one. In general, living donation is not being proposed to these patients as a real option, partly because of their doctors.     

The burden of waiting: wait times for pediatric surgical procedures in Quebec and compliance with national benchmarks

BackgroundWait time information and compliance with national guidelines are limited to a few adult conditions in the province of Quebec. We aimed to assess compliance with Paediatric Canadian Access Targets for Surgery (P-CATS) guidelines and determine the burden incurred due to waiting for 3 common elective surgical conditions (inguinal hernia, cryptorchidism and hypospadias) in a pediatric population.MethodsWe carried out a population-based retrospective cohort study of randomly selected children residing in Quebec without complex chronic medical conditions, using administrative databases belonging to the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec for the period 2010–2013. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated to measure the burden due to waiting. Multivariate forward regression identified risk factors for compliance with national guidelines.ResultsSurgical wait time information was assessed for 1515 patients, and specialist referral wait time was assessed for 1389 patients. Compliance with P-CATS benchmarks was 76.6% for seeing a specialist and 60.7% for receiving surgery. Regression analysis identified older age (p < 0.0001) and referring physician specialty (p = 0.001) as risk factors affecting specialist referral wait time target compliance, whereas older age (p = 0.040), referring physician specialty (p = 0.043) and surgeon specialty (p = 0.002) were significant determinants in surgical wait time compliance. The total burden accrued due to waiting beyond benchmarks was 35 DALYs.ConclusionOur results show that provincial compliance rates with wait time benchmarks are still inadequate and need improvement. Patient age and physician specialty were both found to have significant effects on wait time target compliance.     

Balancing supply and demand: Review of the 2018 donor heart allocation policy

Heart transplant remains the most effective treatment for patients with end stage heart failure. Advances in mechanical circulatory support devices have changed the therapeutic landscape and contributed to a demographic shift in patients awaiting transplant. In the setting of a growing waitlist and concern for an inability of current policies to accurately account for patient acuity and equitable geographic distribution of organs, the United Network for Organ Sharing developed a new donor heart allocation policy which was introduced in 2018. The new policy creates more precise listing criteria to reflect patient acuity, addresses previously marginalized groups, and takes steps to address geographic inequalities.     

The kidney allocation system does not appropriately stratify risk of pediatric donor kidneys: Implications for pediatric recipients

Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was enacted in 2014 to improve graft utility, while facilitating transplantation of highly‐sensitized patients and preserving pediatric access to high‐quality kidneys. Central to this system is the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), a metric intended to predict transplant outcomes based on donor characteristics but derived using only adult donors. We posited that KAS had inadvertently altered the profile and quantity of kidneys made available to pediatric recipients. This question arose from our observation that most pediatric donors carry a KDPI over 35 and have therefore been rendered relatively inaccessible to pediatric recipients under KAS. Here we explore early trends in pediatric transplantation following KAS, including: (i) use of pediatric donors, (ii) use of Public Health System (PHS) high infectious risk donors, (iii) wait time, and (iv) living donor transplantation. We note some concerning preliminary changes following KAS implementation, including the allocation of fewer deceased donor pediatric kidneys to children and stagnation in pediatric wait times. Moreover, the poor predictive power of the KDPI for adult donors appears to be even worse when applied to pediatric donors. These early trends warrant further observation and consideration of changes in pediatric kidney allocation if they persist.     

Outcomes in the highest panel reactive antibody recipients of deceased donor kidneys under the new kidney allocation system

Since the institution of the new kidney allocation system in December 2014, kidney transplant candidates with the highest calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) of 99‐100 have been transplanted at much higher rates. However, concerns have been raised that outcomes in these patients might be impaired due to higher immunological risk and longer cold ischemia times resulting from long‐distance sharing of kidneys. Here, we compare outcomes at the University of Wisconsin between study patients with cPRA 99‐100 and all other recipients of deceased donor kidneys transplanted between 12/04/2014 and 12/31/2015. All patients had at least 6 months post‐transplant follow‐up. The mean follow‐up was 13.9±3 months in cPRA ≥99% and 12.3±3.5 months in cPRA ≤98%. There was a total of 152 transplants, 25 study patients, and 127 controls. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in delayed graft function, rejection, kidney function, graft and patient survival, or infections. We conclude that transplanting the most highly sensitized patients with kidneys shared outside their local donation service areas is associated with excellent short‐term outcomes that are comparable to controls.     

Knowledge and attitudes about deceased donor organ donation in Filipinos: a qualitative assessment

Fewer ethnic minorities, especially Asian-Americans, become organ donors. There are cultural, religious, and personal barriers to becoming a designated organ donor. Factors that promote or inhibit organ donation in Asians, especially Filipinos, are not well understood. We conducted a series of focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to organ donation (deceased donor) among Filipinos. Six focus groups were conducted with church members, adolescents, nurses, physicians, organ recipients, and organ donor families. The mean age of adult participants (n = 57) was 52.3 +/- 15 years, 83% were Catholic, and 72% were female. A qualitative theme analysis methodology identified dominant themes related to organ donation in the participants. The major themes were: awareness of organ donation (38%), family beliefs (25%), religion/spirituality (10%), attitude/emotions (10%), personal experience with organ donation (8%), health profession (6%), and cultural issues (3%). Seventy-five percent of the comments about awareness reflected a positive awareness of cultural issues regarding organ donation, and the rest reflected a lack of awareness or misconceptions. Almost every theme was mentioned in all six focus groups. Understanding a specific ethnic group's knowledge, attitudes, and cultural beliefs regarding organ donation is important in the development of educational campaigns to encourage organ donation in ethnic minority populations.     

Non-heart-beating donor kidneys in the Netherlands: allocation and outcome of transplantation

BACKGROUND: Since February 1, 2001, kidneys from both heart-beating (HB) and non-heart-beating (NHB) donors in The Netherlands have been indiscriminately allocated through the standard renal-allocation system. METHODS: Renal function and allograft-survival rate for kidneys from NHB and HB donors were compared at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: The outcomes of 276 renal transplants, 176 from HB donors and 100 from NHB III donors, allocated through the standard renal allocation system, Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System, and performed between February 1, 2001 and March 1, 2002 were compared. Three months after transplantation, graft survival was 93.7% for HB kidneys and 85.0% for NHB kidneys (P<0.05). At 12 months, graft survival was 92.0% and 83.0%, respectively (P<0.03). Serum creatinine levels in the two groups were comparable at both 3 and 12 months. Multivariate analysis identified previous kidney transplantation (relative risk [RR] 3.33; P<0.005), donor creatinine (RR 1.01; P<0.005), and NHB (RR 2.38; P<0.05) as independent risk factors for transplant failure within 12 months. In multivariate analysis of NHB data, a warm ischemia time (WIT) of 30 minutes or longer (P<0.005; RR 6.16, 95% confidence interval 2.11-18.00) was associated with early graft failure. No difference in 12-month graft survival was seen between HB and NHB kidneys after excluding the kidneys that failed in the first 3 months. CONCLUSION: Early graft failure was significantly more likely in recipients of kidneys from NHB donors. A prolonged WIT was strongly associated with this failure. Standard allocation procedures do not have a negative effect on outcome, and there is no reason to allocate NHB kidneys differently from HB kidneys.     

Improving the prediction of donor kidney quality: deceased donor score and resistive indices

BACKGROUND: The deceased donor score (DDS), expanded criteria donor (ECD) definition, and resistive index (RI) were developed for pretransplant evaluation of donors. DDS and ECD are determined by a calculation of risk from donor variables, while RI is determined from flow characteristics of kidneys during machine preservation (MP). This study was designed to compare DDS, ECD status, and RI as predictors of outcome after deceased donor transplantation. We were also interested to see if DDS or ECD could identify kidneys most likely to benefit from MP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48,952 deceased donor renal transplants reported to UNOS from 1997-2002. DDS (0-39 pts.), ECD status (+ or -), and preservation technique (MP vs. cold storage [CS]) were determined in all cases. RI during MP was studied in a single-center cohort of 425 transplants. RESULTS: DDS was superior to ECD status and RI in its correlation with early and late renal function after transplantation. DDS identified a subgroup of ECD- kidneys, those with DDS > or = 20 pts, that functioned significantly below expectation and similar to ECD+ kidneys. Benefits of MP, which include improved early graft function and a trend towards longer graft survival, were greatest in the group of kidneys with DDS > or = 20 pts. CONCLUSIONS: DDS was the best predictor of outcome after deceased donor renal transplantation and may be useful in identifying kidneys most likely to benefit from MP.     

The organ procurement costs of expanding deceased donor organ acceptance criteria: Evidence from a cost function model

A potential solution to the deceased donor organ shortage is to expand donor acceptability criteria. The procurement cost implications of using nonstandard donors is unknown. Using 5 years of US organ procurement organization (OPO) data, we built a cost function model to make cost projections: the total cost was the dependent variable; production outputs, including the number of donors and organs procured, were the independent variables. In the model, procuring one kidney or procuring both kidneys from double/en bloc transplantation from a single-organ donor resulted in a marginal cost of $55 k (95% confidence interval [CI] $28 k, $99 k) per kidney, and procuring only the liver from a single-organ donor results in a marginal cost of $41 k (95% CI $12 k, $69 k) per liver. Procuring two kidneys for two candidates from a donor lowered the marginal cost to $36 k (95% CI $22 k, $66 k) per kidney, and procuring two kidneys and a liver lowers the marginal cost to $24 k (95% CI $17 k, $45 k) per organ. Economies of scale were observed, where high OPO volume was correlated with lower costs. Despite higher cost per organ than for standard donors, kidney transplantation from nonstandard donors remained cost-effective based on contemporary US data.     

Anesthetic management in pediatric liver transplantation: a comparison of deceased or live donor liver transplantations

Purpose  

Pediatric liver transplantations (LT) are becoming increasingly more common in the treatment of a child with end-stage liver disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative anesthetic experience of pediatric patients undergoing deceased and live donor liver transplantations.