Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been shown to be beneficial and cost-effective for men aged 65-74. However, most screening studies have been conducted in Europe and Australia, where attendance for screening was higher than the single large U.S. study involving only veterans. The prevalence of AAA in the U.S. general population is not well defined, nor is the best method of recruitment for screening. Letters of invitation for a free screening ultrasound for AAA were sent to 30,000 randomly selected Medicare beneficiaries from the hospital referral region of three university-affiliated hospitals without restriction by age, gender, or comorbidity. Attendance for screening was calculated by age, gender, and travel distance to the screening center. Telephone calls to a random sample of nonresponders were made to determine the reason for failure to attend. Prevalence of AAA by ultrasound and known risk factors for AAA (e.g., age, gender, smoking status) were determined. The attendance rate was 7% (2,005). Attendance was greater with male gender (p < 0.01), younger age (p < 0.05), and decreased travel distance to the screening center (p < 0.05). The primary reasons for failure to attend included incorrect address or vital status, poor health, and lack of interest. Prevalence of previously undetected AAA was 2.8% in men and 0.2% in women. AAA was predicted by smoking status and male gender (p < 0.01 for each). Unselected invitation of Medicare beneficiaries for ultrasound screening for AAA results in a low attendance and low yield of AAA. The prevalence estimates from this study may not reflect the entire Medicare population given the low attendance and may reflect the healthy habits of those most interested in screening. Patients should be selected for screening based on their suitability for repair if an AAA is found as well as their risk factors for AAA. The best method of recruitment for screening of those most at risk for AAA in the United States remains to be determined.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: recommendations and controversies

Extensive level one evidence supports routine abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in men aged 65 to 75 years, because AAAs are highly prevalent in this population. Physical examination is an insensitive means of detection. Ruptured AAAs are costly with respect to quality adjusted life years (QALY) lost and medical expenses. Large scale, randomized trials have demonstrated that AAA screening reduces all AAA-related mortality in the screened population and is cost-effective in mid-term follow-up. AAA screening by ultrasound has many advantages over other accepted medical screening programs in its simplicity in structure and the availability of an inexpensive, portable, and reliable means of screening. Additionally, AAA screening almost entirely avoids the negative consequences associated with other screening programs, including the adverse psychological effects and medical costs associated with false-positive examination results. There are subgroups of at-risk women who might benefit from AAA screening, and this issue should be further studied.     

Implications of the New AUA Guidelines on Prostate Cancer Detection in the U.S.

In 2012, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a blanket “D” recommendation against all prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based early detection efforts for prostate cancer, reflecting critical misinterpretations of the major evidence regarding benefits and harms of such testing. Against the backdrop of the ensuing controversy, in 2013 the American Urological Association (AUA) published a new, methodologically rigorous guideline. This guideline recommended that men aged 55–69 be offered biennial screening in the setting of shared decision-making, that men under 40 or over 69 years of age should not be screened routinely, and that evidence was insufficient to recommend screening for men aged 40–54 years. While it has received criticism with regard to the age-based recommendations, the AUA guideline reflects a far better and more balanced presentation of the available evidence than the USPSTF statement. However, because the USPSTF is far more influential than the AUA among primary care providers, the ultimate impact of the new AUA guideline on practice patterns may be limited. Optimizing early detection practices should involve consensus-building incorporating both primary care and specialist input, with the goals of minimizing overtreatment of low-risk disease while continuing to reduce prostate cancer mortality rates through early detection and aggressive management of high-risk disease.     

Late survival after elective repair of aortic aneurysms detected by screening.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether there was any survival advantage in men following elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detected by ultrasound screening compared to those with an AAA detected incidentally. METHODS: A total of 424 men underwent elective AAA repair between 1990 and 1998; 181 were detected in an aneurysm screening programme and 243 were diagnosed incidentally. Follow-up survival data were collected until 2003 (minimum 5 years) and survival curves were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: The postoperative 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in men whose aneurysms were detected by screening (4.4%), compared with those detected incidentally (9.0%). Similarly, 5-year survival (78% vs. 65%) and 10-year survival rates (63% vs. 40%) were better after repair of a screen-detected AAA (p<0.0003 at all time intervals, by log rank testing). Multivariate analysis showed that this was largely due to the older age of men who had repair of an incidental AAA (71.2 vs. 67.1 years). CONCLUSION: Men who had elective repair of an AAA detected by screening had a better late survival rate than men whose aneurysm was discovered incidentally because they were younger at the time of surgery.     

The National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme in England

Background

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for the premature death of more than 4,000 men in England and Wales every year. AAAs are usually asymptomatic before they rupture, yet they are easily detected by a simple abdominal ultrasound scan.

Methods

This paper reviews the evidence for, and implementation of, a national AAA population screening programme in England.

Results

Population screening of 65-year-old men can reassure most that they will not get an AAA, but it can also detect a small number of men with a large AAA at immediate risk of rupture, and a larger number of men with a small or medium AAA at minimal immediate risk, but who may be offered ongoing ultrasound surveillance. Population screening of men aged 65–74 has a sound evidence base, and reduces subsequent AAA-related mortality for at least 13 years by up to 50?%. Some Western countries, including the UK, have adopted population screening using public funding, whereas others remain to be convinced, and continue to collate research. The epidemiology of AAA is changing quickly, with the prevalence in 65-year-old men decreasing rapidly as smoking habits change and more medical treatments are used to manage cardiovascular risk factors.

Conclusion

As evidence on the natural history of AAA continues to emerge, new and ongoing programmes will need to be responsive and adapt. The AAA screening programme of the future will evolve using emerging clinical and cost-effectiveness data.     

Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm bad for your health and well‐being?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present paper was to investigate whether screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) causes health-related quality of life to change in men or their partners. METHODS: A cross-sectional case-control comparison was undertaken of men aged 65-83 years living in Perth, Western Australia, using questionnaires incorporating three validated instruments (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, EuroQol EQ-5D and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) as well as several independent questions about quality of life. The 2009 men who attended for ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta completed a short prescreening questionnaire about their perception of their general health. Four hundred and ninety-eight men (157 with an AAA and 341 with a normal aorta) were sent two questionnaires for completion 12 months after screening, one for themselves and one for their partner, each being about the quality of life of the respondent. RESULTS: Men with an AAA were more limited in performing physical activities than those with a normal aorta (t-test of means P = 0.04). After screening, men with an AAA were significantly less likely to have current pain or discomfort than those with a normal aorta (multivariate odds ratio: 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-0.9) and reported fewer visits to their doctor. The mean level of self-perceived general health increased for all men from before to after screening (from 63.4 to 65.4). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from physical functioning, screening was not associated with decreases in health and well-being. A high proportion of men rated their health over the year after screening as being either the same or improved, regardless of whether or not they were found to have an AAA.     

Ultrasound screening of the abdominal aorta in patients with intermittent claudication

The presence of abdominal aortic dilatations and aneurysms (AAA) among 372 patients (302 men and 70 women) who originally presented with intermittent claudication was studied. The cohort was analysed in two ways, first retrospectively from the date of diagnosis of intermittent claudication until 1st of August 1985 (mean follow-up time being 70 months), second those alive at that date and who had not been operated on were offered ultrasound screening of their aorta. Retrospectively nine male patients were found to have had an operation for an aneurysm, one because of a rupture. Of the 110 patients who died and had not had surgery, 88 (73 men, 15 women) were autopsied and AAA was found at autopsy in six males and one female. Two males died of rupture. Ultrasonographic screening of the abdominal aorta was performed in 183 patients (147 men and 36 women) and dilatation was found in 25 patients (24 men, 1 woman). In the male part of the total material (n = 257) there were 39 patients (15%) with aneurysm or dilatation. Male patients with AAA or dilated aortas were significantly heavier, with a lower ankle arm index and higher serum cholesterol values than patients without AAA or aortic dilatation.     

SCREENING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

A study of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was performed. During a 6 month period, 1225 men and women aged 60–80 years were screen at a variety of community venues. Screening was well received by the public and logistically simple to perform. Thirty-three AAA were detected with sizes between 30 and 81 mm. In the 60–80 year age group, the prevalence of (AAA) > 30 mm in diameter was 4.7% in men and 0.35% in women, and the prevalence of AAA > 50mm was 0.6% in men and 0.17% in women. Cigarette smoking, but not hypertension or diabetes, was found to be a significant risk factor for AAA. This study confirms that screening for AAA is feasible and yields high prevalence rates in major population centres.     

Screening and preoperative imaging of candidates for conventional repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

This article summarizes considerations in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and preoperative imaging before conventional surgical repair. Because death of this relatively common disease can be prevented by an effective treatment, there is great interest in early detection and elective repair. The prevalence of AAA in older adults (65 to 80 years of age) varies from 4% to 7%. Factors associated with AAA include smoking, age, coronary artery disease, high serum cholesterol level, family history, and hypertension. A higher prevalence of AAA has been found among first-degree relatives of AAA patients, particularly in men, and smoking is an important factor in the development and progression of AAA. Screening for AAA may be appropriate in male patients older than 65 years with a smoking history, particularly current smokers, who have carotid occlusive disease, coronary artery disease, or lower extremity occlusive disease. Ultrasound is the screening method of choice and has the benefit of being inexpensive and noninvasive. Preoperative imaging serves mainly to establish the indication for operation. The vascular surgeon comfortable with discovering potentially confusing anatomic configurations or adverse extensions of pathology at the time of operation may not require any imaging beyond ultrasound. Specific indications for arteriography include suggestion of juxtarenal aneurysm by ultrasound or physical examination, clinical evidence of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease, uncontrolled hypertension or unexplained creatinine elevation, or prior arterial reconstruction. Spiral computed tomography (CT) scan with 3-dimensional reconstruction and gadolinium magnetic resonance (MR) angiography are increasingly useful alternatives to contrast arteriography.     

Ultraschallscreening auf abdominale Aortenaneurysmen (AAA)

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture is associated with a high mortality. The only preventive therapy is early diagnosis and elective surgery of rupture prone AAAs. Using B-mode sonography AAAs can be detected early with great reliability. Thus, a population-based ultrasound screening might lower the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptures.

Materials and methods

A literature analysis (until June 2014) was performed in the databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS including all randomized controlled trials (RCT), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, health technology assessments (HTA reports) and medical guidelines on AAA screening. The following keywords were used: abdominal aortic aneurysm, ultrasound screening, evidence, guidelines. Clinically relevant endpoints were the following: AAA-associated mortality, overall mortality, number of elective AAA operations, number of ruptured AAAs and emergency surgery for different follow-up intervals.

Results

In four RCTs men between 65 and 83 years either had a single or no ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta. Older women were only analyzed in one RCT. The meta-analysis of the RCT results shows that ultrasound screening caused a significant decrease of AAA-associated mortality, number of ruptured abdominal aneurysms, and number of emergency operations, whereas the number of elective surgeries significantly increased. Overall mortality was only moderately decreased by AAA screening.

Conclusion

Evidence was provided in population-based RCTs and meta-analyses for the efficiency of ultrasound based AAA screening for men older than 65 years. Presently the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWIG) are evaluating a national ultrasound-based AAA screening program for Germany. However, additional clinical trials are necessary to assess risk groups especially men under 65 years, women with nicotine abuse and cardiovascular diseases which were underrepresented in previous studies.     

Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the potential psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: The participants were prospectively and randomly sampled from a randomised screening trial for AAA and asked to complete a validated generic and global anonymous quality of life (QL) questionnaire by self-assessment (ScreenQL). Material case-control study: ScreenQL was completed once by 168 (48%) of 350 non-responders to screening, 271 (81%) of 335 attenders before screening, 286 (85%) of 335 attenders after screening, 127 (85%) of 149 with a small AAA diagnosed at screening, and 231 (66%) of 350 who were randomised not to be offered screening for AAA (controls). Prospective study (paired data): 127 men having a small AAA diagnosed. Twenty-nine (81%) of 36 men operated after initial conservative treatment. RESULTS: Initially, the QL score was 5% lower among men with a small AAA compared to the controls (p<0.05), mainly because of poorer health perception. The QL score declined significantly further to 7% below control values during the period of conservative treatment. This impairment was mainly due to a 21% and 15% reduction in scores relating to health perception and psychosomatic distress, respectively. However, all scores improved to control levels in patients operated on. The QL of attending men for screening was significantly lower than that of the controls and the attenders after the screening. No differences were noticed concerning the non-attenders. CONCLUSION: The offer of screening causes transient psychological stress in subjects found not to have AAA. However, diagnosis of an AAA seems to impair QL permanently and progressively in conservatively treated cases. This impairment seems reversible by operation. Nevertheless, the impairment seems considerable, and must be considered in the management of AAA and in the final evaluation of screening for AAA.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Poland

Background

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is currently recommended by several vascular societies. In countries where it has been introduced the prevalence of AAAs differed greatly and was mainly related to cigarette smoking. The screening program also had an enormous impact on the decrease of AAA ruptures and reduced mortality rate. These facts have led to the introduction of the first screening program for AAAs in Poland.

Objective

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of AAAs among men aged 60 years and older undergoing ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta.

Material and methods

A single ultrasonography of the abdomen was performed to assess the aorta from the renal arteries to the bifurcation and the diameter of the aorta was measured at its widest point. The cut-off value for determining an aortic aneurysm was set at a diameter of ≥?30 mm. All ultrasonography measurements were performed by physicians in outpatient departments throughout the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province. Additionally, each subject had to fill out a questionnaire with demographic data, smoking habits, existing comorbidities and familial occurrence of AAAs. The study was conducted from October 2009 to November 2011.

Results

The abdominal aorta ultrasound examinations were carried out in 1556 men aged 60 years and older. The prevalence of AAA in the study population was 6.0?% (94 out of 1556). The average age of the men was 69 years (SD 6 years, range 60–92 years). In the study population 55?% of the men smoked or had smoked and 3?% were aware of the presence of AAAs in family members. There were three risk factors significantly associated with the presence of AAAs: age (p?Conclusion The prevalence of AAAs among men in Poland is higher than in other European countries and the USA. The screening program for AAAs is an easy and reliable method for detecting early stages of the disease and risk factors which are the driving forces for the development of AAAs.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associations in men and women. METHODS: Veterans aged 50 to 79 years without a previous history of AAA underwent ultrasound screening for AAA after completing a questionnaire on demographic information and potential risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 122,272 men and 3450 women were successfully screened. An AAA of 3.0 cm or greater in diameter was found in 4.3% of men and 1.0% of women (P <.001). Contrary to a previous report, we did not find suprarenal aortic enlargement accompanying AAA to be more common in women. The principal associations that we have previously reported for AAA in this cohort (age, smoking, family history of AAA, and a negative association with diabetes) were all similar in women compared with men. In age- and smoking-adjusted models, the interaction terms indicated that black race and cancer were more strongly associated with AAA in women than men (P <.05). Height and cerebral vascular disease were also more strongly associated with AAA in women than in men, but these interaction terms did not reach statistical significance (P <.10). Although the other differences were unexpected and require confirmation, the trend toward a stronger association of cerebral vascular disease with AAA in women is consistent with two previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the much lower prevalence of AAA in women, the most important associations with AAA are similar to those seen in men. Our data provide some support for a previous finding that cerebrovascular disease may be more closely associated with AAA in women than in men.     

Risk of developing an abdominal aortic aneurysm after ectatic aorta detection from initial screening

ObjectiveCurrent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance guidelines lack any follow-up recommendations after initial abdominal aortic screening diameter of less than 3.0 cm. Some reports have demonstrated patients with late AAA formation and late ruptures after initial ultrasound screening detection of patients with an aortic diameter of 2.5 to 2.9 cm (ectatic aorta). The purpose of this study was to determine ectatic aorta prevalence, AAA development, rupture risk, and risk factor profile in patients with detected ectatic aortas in a AAA screening program.MethodsA retrospective chart review of all patients screened for AAA from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, within a regional health care system was conducted. Screening criteria were men 65 to 75 years of age that smoked a minimum of 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. An ectatic aorta was defined as a maximum aortic diameter from 2.5 to 2.9 cm. An AAA was defined as an aortic diameter of 3 cm or greater. Patients screened with ectatic aortas who had subsequent follow-up imaging of the aorta with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were analyzed for associated clinical and cardiovascular risk factors. All data were collected through December 3,/2018. A logistic regression of statistically significant variables from univariate and χ² analyses were performed to identify risks associated with the development of AAA from an initially diagnosed ectatic aorta. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess survival data. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsFrom a screening pool of 19,649 patients, 3205 (16.3%) with a mean age of 72.1 ± 5.3 years were identified to have an ectatic aorta from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. The average screening ectatic aortic diameter was 2.6 ± 0.1 cm. There were 672 patients (21.0%) with a mean age of 73.0 ± 5.7 years who received subsequent imaging for other clinical indications and 193 of these patients (28.7%) with ectatic aortas developed an AAA from the last follow-up scan (4.2 ± 2.5 years). The average observation length of all patients was 6.4 ± 2.9 years. No ruptures were reported, but 27.8% of deaths were of unknown cause. One patient had aortic growth to 5.5 cm or greater (0.15%). Larger initial screening diameter (P < .01), presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), and active smoking (P = .01) were associated with AAA development.ConclusionsPatients with diagnosed ectatic aortas from screening who are active smokers or have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are likely to develop an AAA.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in over 65-year-old men with inguinal hernias

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in over 65-year-old men who have inguinal hernias and discuss if pre-operative selective screening of this population is appropriate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study on 70 consecutive male patients with an age range of 65–88 years (mean, 74 years) who were referred to a single vascular consultant''s out-patient clinic with an inguinal hernia were screened for the presence of an AAA with an ultrasound scan before hernia repair over a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two patients were found to have an AAA measuring 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm giving an AAA prevalence of 3% (exact 95% confidence interval = 0–10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not demonstrate an increased AAA prevalence in over 65-year-old male patients with inguinal hernias, scanned pre-operatively when compared to screening programmes. Selective screening of this cohort cannot be justified on this evidence.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in Sweden

A large body of evidence from four international randomised controlled trials (RCT) on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening indicate that ultrasound-based screening in elderly men with a high prevalence (4?%–7?%) reduces AAA-related mortality by 40?% through early AAA detection and increased preventive elective repair and subsequently halves rupture incidence. Coinciding with the planned launch of national AAA screening programs, a dramatic change in AAA epidemiology became evident: a lower AAA prevalence in the targeted population of men and falling mortality rates, most likely related to a drop in rates of smoking, and a paradoxical increase in elective AAA repairs. These changes have called AAA screening in today’s context into question. Sweden was the first country to provide national coverage with an AAA screening program targeting 65-year-old men. The scientifically evaluated screening initiative, started in 2006, reported the lower than expected prevalence (1.7?%) in 65-year-old men early on. Cost-effectiveness seems to be maintained despite the altered epidemiology, as shown in a health-economic study. The current prevalence of AAA among Swedish women is very low, and general population-based screening of women is likely to be futile, although targeted screening among female smokers should be evaluated. Sub-aneurysmal aortas detected at screening are likely to progress to a true AAA within 5 years, indicating a need for continued surveillance in this group. Differences in screening compliance seem to be linked to socio-economic factors. The aim of this topical review is to highlight AAA screening within a Swedish context and point to areas where information is lacking and further research is needed.     

Initial results of ultrasound screening for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in Western Australia: relevance for endoluminal treatment of aneurysm disease

BACKGROUND: Increased life expectancy in men during the last thirty years is largely due to the decrease in mortality from cardiovascular disease in the age group 29--69 yr. This change has resulted in a change in the disease profile of the population with conditions such as aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) becoming more prevalent. The advent of endoluminal treatment for AAA has encouraged prophylactic intervention and fueled the argument to screen for the disease. The feasibility of inserting an endoluminal graft is dependent on the morphology and growth characteristics of the aneurysm. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for AAA in men aged 65--83 yr in Western Australia for the purpose of determining the norms of the living anatomy in the pressurized infrarenal aorta. AIMS: To examine (1) the diameters of the infra-renal aorta in aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal cases, (2) the implications for treatment modalities, with particular reference to endoluminal grafting, which is most dependent on normal and aneurysmal morphology, and (3) any evidence to support the notion that northern Europeans are predisposed to aneurysmal disease. METHODS: Using ultrasound, a randomized control trial was established in Western Australia to assess the value of a screening program in males aged 65--83 yr. The infra-renal aorta was defined as aneurysmal if the maximum diameter was 30 mm or more. Aortic diameter was modelled both as a continuous (in mm) and as a binary outcome variable, for those men who had an infra-renal diameter of 30 mm or more. ANOVA and linear regression were used for modelling aortic diameter as a continuum, while chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used in comparing men with and without the diagnosis of AAA. FINDINGS: By December 1998, of 19,583 men had been invited to undergo ultrasound screening for AAA, 12,203 accepted the invitation (corrected response fraction 70.8%). The prevalence of AAA increased with age from 4.8% at 65 yr to 10.8% at 80 yr (chi(2)=77.9, df=3, P<0.001). The median (IQR) diameter for the non-aneurysmal group was 21.4 mm (3.3 mm) and there was an increase (chi(2)=76.0, df=1, P<0.001) in the diameter of the infra-renal aorta with age. Since 27 mm is the 95th centile for the non-aneurysmal infra-renal aorta, a diameter of 30 mm or more is justified as defining an aneurysm. The risk of AAA was higher in men of Australian (OR=1.0) and northern European origin (OR=1.0, 95%CL: 0.9, 1.2) compared with those of Mediterranean origin (OR=0.5, 95%CL: 0.4, 0.7). CONCLUSION: Although screening has not yet been shown to reduce mortality from AAA, these population-based data assist the understanding of aneurysmal disease and the further development and use of endoluminal grafts for this condition.     

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in cardiovascular patients

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) in a population of symptomatic cardiac patients. A retrospective cohort study of investigations was done at the cardiology clinic, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 415 men and women recruited by referral to the cardiology clinic. All participants underwent routine ultrasound screening for AAA, and full assessment of all cardiac risk factors. Data were analyzed and correlated with age, sex, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of aneurysm was based on an anteroposterior diameter of 3 cm or more. Of the 415 patients screened, 47 aneurysms were detected. Total incidence of AAA was 9.9% (male 14.1%, female 3.95%). All aneurysms were detected in patients over 60 years, detection rate 11.7% (male 16.3%, female 3.9%). The incidence of AAA was significantly higher in those who were subsequently proven to have cardiovascular disease, 13.8% (male 18%, female 5.15%). CONCLUSION: Screening the general population for those at risk of AAA is an ongoing debate. This study supports the concept of screening a higher risk population of patients over 60 years with cardiovascular disease.     

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Using Non-imaging Hand-held Ultrasound Volume Scanner – A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is cost-effective and timely repair improves outcome. Using standard ultrasound (US) an AAA can be accurately diagnosed or ruled-out. However, this requires training and bulk equipment. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of a new hand-held ultrasound bladder volume indicator (BVI) in the setting of AAA screening. METHODS: In total, 94 patients (66 +/- 14 years, 67 men) referred for atherosclerotic disease were screened for the presence of AAA (diameter > 30 mm using US). All patients underwent both examinations, with US and BVI. Using the BVI, aortic volume was measured at 6 pre-defined points. Maximal diameters (US) and volumes (BVI) were used for analyses. RESULTS: In 54 (57%) patients an AAA was diagnosed using US. The aortic diameter by US correlated closely with aortic volume by BVI (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Using a cut-off value of > or = 50 ml for the presence of AAA by BVI, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of BVI in detection of AAA were 94%, 82%, 88% and 92%, respectively. The agreement between the two methods was 89%, kappa 0.78. CONCLUSION: The bladder volume indicator is a promising tool in screening patients for AAA.