Recent Advances in CAR-T Cell Therapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy with anti CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell has changed the treatment landscape in relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas. They have emerged as effective therapy in patients with multiple relapsed/refractory disease, capable of sustaining durable remissions. Two CAR-T cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) are currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A third anti CD19 CAR-T cell, lisocabtagene ciloleucel is currently being evaluated in large clinical trials and may also be United States Food and Drug Administration-approved soon. CAR-T cell-related toxicities, including infections, cytokine release syndrome, and neurotoxicity are potential complications of therapy. With increasing use of CAR-T cells, the mechanism of toxicities and mitigation strategies needs to be developed. Additionally, reasons for CAR-T cell failure and progression following this therapy needs to be further studied. We describe the recent developments in this field, with emphasis on the complications of therapy and factors contributing to toxicities, efficacy, and resistance. We also describe the ongoing research in this field and the newer CAR-T cell constructs that are being developed to counter the challenges that have been identified in this field.     

肿瘤患者导管相关性深静脉血栓应用预防性抗凝治疗的临床观察

目的 探讨预防性抗凝治疗对恶性肿瘤患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)后相关性血栓的作用.方法 选取2013年1月至2016年12月间广州医科大学附属第一医院收治的系统治疗前予PICC置管的143例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据治疗方式不同进行分组,其中化疗过程接受预防性抗凝治疗的95例患者纳入预防性抗凝组,仅...     

Utilization and Complications of Central Venous Access Devices in Oncology Patients

Purpose: To describe how central venous access devices (CVADs) are utilized for ambulatory oncology patients and to evaluate the rate of complications. Method: Single institution retrospective study of oncology patients with CVADs who received systemic treatment at the Walker Family Cancer Centre (WFCC) between 1 January and 31 December 2018. Results: A total of 480 CVADS were placed in 305 patients, of which 408 (85%) were peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 72 (15%) were implanted vascular access devices (PORTs). The incidence of early and late complications was 9% and 24%, respectively. For the entire cohort, the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 16%, of which 9% were CVAD-related thrombosis (CRTs) and 7% were distant VTE. The CRT rates were similar for PICCs and PORTs (9% vs. 7%). A total of 6% of CVADs were complicated by infection (i.e., localized infections and bacteremia), with a total infection rate of 0.43 and 0.26 per 1000 indwelling days for PICCs and PORTs, respectively. The incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was greater for PICCs than PORTs, at a rate of 0.22 compared with 0.08 per 1000 indwelling days, respectively. The premature catheter removal rate was 26% for PICCs and 18% for PORTs. PORTs required more additional hospital visits. Conclusions: PICCs were utilized more frequently than PORTs and had a higher rate of premature removal. The rates of VTE and CRT were similar for both CVAD types. PORTs had a lower rate of infection per 1000 indwelling days. However, the management of PORT related complications required more visits to the hospital and oncology clinic.     

An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: Complications and patient satisfaction

Aims

We wanted to assess the factors that predict complications and patient satisfaction of totally implanted central venous access ports (TIAP).

Methods

We reviewed 550 patients with breast or gynaecological malignancies who had initial port placement for chemotherapy between 1995 and 2006. We retrospectively assessed all TIAP complications, port duration and follow-up care until the TIAPs were removed (or the last known recorded documentation) or until the death of the patient. TIAP-related patient satisfaction was also assessed via a questionnaire-based survey of 356 patients.

Results

561 TIAPs were placed in 550 cancer patients (11 patients received 2 TIAPs during the study period); the median time of port duration was 22.5 months. There were 104 complications in this group. Of these, 81 occurred during chemotherapy treatment that lasted a median time of 182 days. Removal secondary to complication was observed in 48 cases. TIAPs placed on the left chest side, through the subclavian vein or with the catheter tip localized in the peripheral part of superior vena cava demonstrated the highest incidence of complications. Patients with a BMI >28.75 had an increased risk for developing complications. Our follow-up questionnaire revealed a 93% patient satisfaction rate with the TIAP.

Conclusions

Patients with left-sided ports, catheter tips lying in the upper part of the superior vena cava and implantation via the subclavian vein are at a higher risk for TIAP-associated complications. Being excessively overweight was assessed as another risk factor for developing complications. TIAPs are highly accepted and further recommended by patients.     

Response to COVID-19 Vaccination Post-CAR T Therapy in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

COVID-19 adversely affects individuals with cancer. Several studies have found that seroconversion rates among patients with hematologic malignancies are suboptimal when compared to patients without cancer. Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are immunocompromised due to impaired humoral and cellular immunity in addition to prescribed immunosuppressive therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is now widely used for NHL and MM, but little is known about seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination among these populations. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding IgG antibody levels following COVID-19 vaccination among NHL and MM CAR T therapy recipients. Out of 104 CAR T infusions, 19 patients developed known COVID-19 infection post-CAR T. We tested 17 patients that received CAR T for antibody spike titers post COVID-19 vaccination, only 29 % (n = 5) were able to mount a clinically relevant antibody response (>250 IU/mL).     

The Use of 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients With B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Humoral Immune Dysfunction After Treatment With Rituximab

BackgroundRituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody used to treat autoimmune conditions and B cell neoplasms. We characterized immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and vaccine responses in rituximab-treated B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Patients with impaired vaccine responses were offered therapy with 20% subcutaneous (subq) Ig.Patients and MethodsPatients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of B cell NHL who had received rituximab within the past 24 months were eligible for the study and underwent the following immune evaluation: serum IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, T/B cell lymphocyte panel, and pre/post vaccine IgG titers to diphtheria, tetanus, and streptococcus pneumoniae. Patients were vaccinated with tetanus, diphtheria and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Patients with abnormal vaccine responses were offered prophylactic subq Ig for 52 weeks.ResultsFifteen patients with NHL were enrolled in the study. The median IgG was 628 mg/dL [interquartile range, 489-718 mg/dL]. Three (20%) of 15 patients responded to diphtheria vaccination, 1 (6.7%) of 15 responded to tetanus vaccination, and 3 (20%) of 15 responded to vaccination to streptococcus pneumoniae. Thirteen (86.7%) of 15 met criteria for humoral immunodeficiency. Ten patients received subq Ig, and experienced a significant increase in serum IgG (P = .008). There were no serious adverse events, and there was a decrease in nonneutropenic infections while on subq Ig therapy.ConclusionsPatients with NHL treated with rituximab may have significant humoral immunodeficiency as defined by abnormal vaccine responses even in the setting of relatively normal IgG levels. For these patients, subq Ig replacement therapy is well-tolerated and efficacious in improving serum IgG, and may decrease reliance on antibiotics for the treatment of nonneutropenic infections.     

Intensive Induction Therapy Compared With CHOP for Hepatosplenic T-cell Lymphoma

IntroductionHepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma that disproportionately affects individuals with a clinical history of immunosuppression. It carries a poor prognosis, and, owing to its rarity, there is no single or well-established treatment.Patients and MethodsWe conducted the largest-to-date individual-level meta-analysis based on literature searches to determine the best induction therapy for HSTCL. We compared response rates and survival among patients who received “non–CHOP-based” induction with regimens containing cytarabine, etoposide, and/or platinum-based treatment to those receiving treatment with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or CHOP-like therapy. We also review additional regimens including alemtuzumab and pentostatin, and assessed the role of consolidation with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT).ResultsWe identified 166 patients with HSTCL, 118 of whom had sufficient information on induction treatment and survival. Eighty-four patients received non-CHOP-based (N = 34) or CHOP/CHOP-like (N = 50) induction treatment. Non-CHOP-based induction was associated with a complete/partial response rate of 82% compared with 52% (P = .006) with CHOP/CHOP-like and increased median overall survival (P = .00014). Our data showed that maximum survival among patients with HSTCL was achieved with non-CHOP-based induction followed by consolidation with HSCT.ConclusionsNon-CHOP-based induction appears superior to CHOP/CHOP-like induction in both achieving complete/partial response and durable survival. Induction therapy of HSTCL should be intensified with non-CHOP-based regimens and followed by consolidation with HSCT in eligible patients.     

Protocol for the implantation of a venous access device (Port-A-Cath System). The complications and solutions found in 560 cases

Introduction The cannulation of suitable peripheral veins may be a very painful experience. Implantable venous access systems have to some degree relieved this problem and help to provide an improvement in terms of quality of life. Material and methods We have evaluated 560 patients during a follow up period of two years. A low overall complication percentage of 7.32% was seen when using the venous access device. Results Complications and treatments were: pneumothorax; portal rotation or infection; catheter infection; embolism and migration; extravasation; partial or total obstruction of the device; rupture of the catheter or the membrane. Conclusions There is no other system that allows repeated venous access on such a long term basis. Placing the devices completely under the skin allows the patient to conduct a normal life style, and its maintenance does not need any special care, with the exception of the monthly heparinised serum infusion. The preferred option is to insert the catheter through the cephalic vein in the delto pectoral groove.     

Diabetes and the Prognosis in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies

BackgroundConsensus lacks regarding the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the prognosis of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We aimed to systematically evaluate the above association, as well as the potential influence of metformin use in a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Materials and MethodsCohort studies investigating the association between DM and survival outcomes of patients with NHL were included by search of electronic databases that included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. A random-effects model was adopted to combine the results.ResultsEight cohort studies including 8652 patients with NHL were analyzed. Compared to non-DM patients with NHL, DM was associated with poor overall survival (OS, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.89, P < .001, I² = 69%), progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.56, P = .004, I² = 0%), and lymphoma-specific survival (LSS, HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.41-2.45, P < .001, I² = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, HR = 1.42, 1.35, and 1.95 for outcomes of OS, PFS, and LSS, respectively; P values all <.05). However, the associations between DM and these survival outcomes became nonsignificant in subgroup analysis limited to DM patients with concurrent use of metformin (HR = 1.30, 1.12, and 1.43 for outcomes of OS, PFS, and LSS, respectively; P values all > .10).ConclusionsDM is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with B-cell NHL, which is consistent in patients with DLBCL. Concurrent metformin use in DM patients with NHL may be associated with improved survival outcomes.     

Limited Utility of Surveillance Imaging for Detecting Disease Relapse in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete Remission

IntroductionSurveillance imaging with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT) is commonly used in practice in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who are in remission after front-line therapies. We aimed to determine the utility of routine imaging for detecting first relapse in patients with NHL in complete remission (CR) after first-line therapies.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with NHL who achieved CR after first-line therapies and then subsequently had disease relapse. We evaluated whether the relapse was detected solely by surveillance CT or PET/CT or by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination findings, or both. Subgroup analysis was performed on baseline histologic type (indolent vs. aggressive NHL). Data were also collected to determine the cost of surveillance PET/CT and the number of additional diagnostic imaging procedures, invasive procedures, and iatrogenic complications directly resulting from an abnormality detected on a surveillance scan.ResultsOne hundred sixty-three patients with first relapse of NHL between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were included. The majority of the relapses were detected by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination, or both, as opposed to surveillance imaging (77.9% [n = 127] vs. 22.1% [n = 36]; P < .0001). There was no overall survival difference between the 2 groups (P = .66). Patient-reported symptoms led to the detection of the majority of relapses in aggressive (85.7% [n = 72] vs. 14.3% [n = 12]; P < .0001) as well as indolent NHL (69.6% [n = 55] vs. 30.4% [n = 24]; P = .0007). Surveillance PET/CT contributed to more than 75% of follow-up health care costs in the first 2 years of monitoring for relapse. The surveillance imaging group had 1 reported case of iatrogenic pneumothorax.ConclusionOur retrospective analysis suggests that there is a limited role for surveillance imaging by CT or PET/CT in detecting first relapse in NHL. There was no difference in survival outcomes between the 2 groups in our study.     

Bacterial Infection Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib-based Induction Therapy: Real-World Experience in an Asian Cancer Center

BackgroundThe treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has progressed significantly, and over the past decade, bortezomib-based induction therapy has been a standard of care. However, the practice of antibacterial prophylaxis during induction therapy has been diverse. The aim of our study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with febrile episodes and bacteremia among patients with MM, during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy, without routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, but with routine Pneumocystis Carinii prophylaxis (mostly with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), in a region with high fluoroquinolone resistance rate. Of note, these patients have direct access to health care facilities and timely supportive care.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated newly diagnosed MM patients from 2014 to 2018 receiving bortezomib-based induction therapy for the proportion of patients who had febrile episodes and bacteremia in the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy. We also evaluated if there were factors associated with increased febrile episodes including age, absolute neutrophil count, creatinine clearance, M-band level at diagnosis, nadir platelet count, International Staging System, and Revised International Staging System.ResultsOf the 108 evaluable patients, there were a total of 25 (23.1%) patients who had febrile episodes, and 1 (0.9%) patient who had bacteremia during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy. All patients recovered well. No deaths were seen. Febrile episodes were associated with lower absolute neutrophil count (P = .036), renal impairment (P = .013), and ISS stage (P = .026).ConclusionThe proportion of patients with significant bacterial infection during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy without routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, but with routine Pneumocystis Carinii prophylaxis (mostly with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), is low in a population with adequate access to health care facilities and timely supportive care.     

Comparison of Techniques for Involved-Site Radiation Therapy in Patients With Lower Mediastinal Lymphoma

PurposePatients with lower mediastinal lymphoma (LML) benefit dosimetrically from proton therapy (PT) compared with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The added dosimetric benefit of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is unknown; therefore, we evaluated IMRT versus PT and free-breathing (FB) versus DIBH among patients with LML.Methods and MaterialsTwenty-one patients with LML underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography and 3 sequential DIBH scans at simulation. Involved-site radiation therapy target volumes and organ-at-risk contours were developed for both DIBH and FB scans. FB-IMRT, DIBH-IMRT, FB-PT, and DIBH-PT plans were generated for each patient for comparison.ResultsThe median difference in lung volume between the DIBH and FB scans was 1275 mL; the average difference in clinical target volume was 5.7 mL. DIBH-IMRT produced a lower mean lung dose (10.8 vs 11.9 Gy; P < .001) than FB-IMRT, with no difference in mean heart dose (MHD; 16.1 vs 15.0 Gy; P = .992). Both PT plans produced a significantly lower mean dose to the lung, heart, left ventricle, esophagus, and nontarget body than DIBH-IMRT. DIBH-PT reduced the median MHD by 4.2 Gy (P < .0001); left ventricle dose by 5.1 Gy (P < .0001); and lung V5 by 26% (P < .0001) versus DIBH-IMRT. The 2 PT plans were comparable, with DIBH-PT reducing mean lung dose (7.0 vs 7.7 Gy; P = .063) and with no difference in MHD (10.3 vs 9.5 Gy; P = .992).ConclusionsAmong patients with LML, DIBH (IMRT or PT) improved lung dosimetry over FB but had little influence on MHD. PT (DIBH and FB) significantly reduced lung, heart, esophagus, and nontarget body dose compared with DIBH IMRT, potentially reducing the risk of late complications.