Burden of disease - prevalence and incidence of ESRD in selected European regions and populations

Rates of renal replacement therapy (RRT) vary markedly between Eastern and Western European countries. This review aims to establish the characteristics of healthcare systems and renal services that are independently associated with rates of initiation of RRT in these countries. The incidence of RRT varied from 12 to 455 per million populations (pmp); the only general population indicator independently associated with RRT incidence was aged 65+. Economic and financial conditions could also play an important role. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and the proportion of GDP spent on healthcare independently predicted RRT incidence. Each increase in hemodialysis (HD) facilities and competition between providers is associated with higher RRT incidence. In this context, macroeconomic and potentially modifiable renal service organizational factors appear more important determinants of provision of RRT than measurable medical factors. The economic, financial or medical conditions could also play an important role in treatment strategy. The proportion of patients receiving HD, peritoneal dialysis (PD) or transplantation shows marked variation in Europe. The East Europeans use more HD and less RTx as compared to West Europeans; the use of PD is similar. Treatment of anemia and mineral metabolism disorders also varies from one region to another. The mean baseline hemoglobin level and the prevalence of patients reaching this value are higher in West Europeans. Regarding mineral metabolism, the percent of patients achieving all four parameters (Ca, P, CaxP and PTH) was also higher in Western Europe. The adherence to EBPG (European Best Practice Guidelines) was also higher in these countries.     

Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy.

BACKGROUND: The diffusion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Italy is lower than expected on the basis of indications and contraindications reported in literature. METHODS: To analyse the factors influencing the use of PD in Italy, we used data from the first National Census of the Italian Society of Nephrology relating to 9773 incident patients (Incid(HD + PD)) in 2004 and 43 293 prevalent patients dialysed in 658 centres at 31/12/2004 (337 public centres, 286 private centres, 12 paediatric centres, 15 research or religious institutions and 8 unspecified). RESULTS: The percentages on PD of total incident (Inc(PD)%) and prevalent dialysis patients (Prev(PD)%) were 15.9% and 10.3%, respectively with considerable variations from region to region and from centre to centre. The Inc(PD)% was higher in regions with fewer patients on dialysis in private centres. In the private centres, the Inc(PD)% was 0.4%. Of the 325 non-paediatric public centres, 116 (35.7%) do not use PD: compared with the 209 centres which do, these centres have a lower mean Inc(HD + PD) and Prev(HD + PD) per centre (13.0 +/- 12.3 vs 28.6 +/- 18.0 - 51.8 +/- 35.7 vs 117.3 +/- 66.4 patients, P < 0.0001), and more haemodialysis (HD) stations available (3.0 vs 3.5 patients per HD station, P < 0.0001). However, the significant influence of cultural and motivational factors on the use of this method is demonstrated by the fact that it is used by 34% of the smaller non-paediatric public centres, and is not used by 19% of the larger non-pediatric public centres.     

Survey on the current status of delivered informed consent for renal replacement therapy among patients with end-stage renal disease

We conducted a survey on the adequacy of delivered informed consent (IC) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) regarding the information provided on renal replacement therapies (RRT): Hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and renal transplantation (RTx). A self-assessment style of questionnaire entitled "Informed consent for the selection of dialysis therapy modality" was prepared for evaluation, and the adequacy of IC was scored by 5 grades ranging from "excellent" to "bad". The questionnaire was sent to all the JSDT registered facilities (n=3484), and 480 centers replied (13.8%). Among these, 407 centers had patients introduced onto some form of RRT modality in the last 12 months. As to the adequacy of delivered IC for each modality, "excellent and good" status was reported as follows: 80.8% in HD, 49.8% in PD, and 32.5% in RTx, respectively. The major reason for "poor and bad" IC adequacy in PD and RTx, was "not available in the facility". By analyzing the facilities stratified by the clinical experiences of each modality in the past, poorly delivered IC for PD and RTx was revealed in centers lacking experience. Delivered information about RRT to ESRD patients may be biased in Japan. The findings of this study suggested that a lack of medical experience of the modality contributes to insufficient IC.     

Surgical Interventions for Renal Replacement Therapy from the View of Nephrologists

Summary BACKGROUND: The number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing worldwide at a rate of approximately 5 % per year. In Austria, 6049 patients were suffering from ESRD in the year 2001, an annual rate of 1093 patients. Higher age of patients and co-morbidities are forcing nephrologists to find the optimal renal replacement therapy (RRT) and access modality for the individual patient. METHODS: For patients with ESRD needing RRT, both nephrologist and surgeon should be consulted to ensure optimal management and treatment including vascular access surgery. Patients planned for peritoneal dialysis (PD) are treated with the cooperation of a visceral surgeon. A catheter is inserted into the pelvic area to enable solution exchange. In patients who are to undergo hemodialysis (HD), nephrologists have to decide whether the cardiac condition is suitable for surgical access creation such as fistula or graft. Otherwise alternative hemodialysis devices such as a central venous catheter (CVC), or subcutaneously implantable ports (Dialock^®), have to be discussed. Access function is routinely monitored during dialysis treatment, but still remains the weak component of extracorporeal RRT responsible for 40 % of hospitalization of HD patients. RESULTS: At the dialysis unit of the University Hospital of Graz, 107 patients were under RRT (70 HD and 37 PD), and 235 patients were hemodialyzed in private units in Graz in 2001. 81 ESRD patients were newly enrolled in the chronic HD program. 131 HD accesses were created in new HD patients and patients under treatment for chronic HD. 36 patients developed HD access complications and in these patients, 181 surgical and/or radiological interventions were performed. CONCLUSIONS: In 12 % of the HD patients in Graz, access problems occurred. These patients have a high frequency of surgical and radiological interventions. Access monitoring and measurement of recirculation may help to reduce the complication rate by 38 %. Before onset of RRT, patients need special management to ensure the best dialysis modality. ESRD patients who are suffering from cardiac diseases, diabetes mellitus, or bad peripheral vascular status need a multidisciplinary approach with nephrologists, cardiologists, surgeons and radiologists working together to find the optimal access for dialysis treatment.     

PD First: Peritoneal Dialysis as the Default Transition to Dialysis Therapy

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and in‐center hemodialysis (HD) are accepted as clinically equivalent dialysis modalities, yet in‐center HD is the predominant renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality offered to new end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in the United States and most other industrialized nations. This predominance has little to do with clinical outcomes, patient choice, cost, or quality of life. It has been driven by ease of HD initiation, physician experience and training, inadequate pre‐ESRD patient education, ample in‐center HD capacity, and lack of adequate infrastructure for PD‐related care. As compared with in‐center HD, PD is a widely applicable, yet underutilized modality of RRT that provides comparable clinical outcomes, superior quality of life measures, significant cost savings, and many other unmeasured advantages. A “PD First” approach not only has advantages for patients but also physicians, healthcare systems, and society. In this review, we will summarize evidence demonstrating that PD should be the default modality when new ESRD patients are transitioning to dialysis therapy when preemptive transplantation is not an option and highlight the essential infrastructural requirements to allow for a “PD First” model.     

End-stage renal care in developing countries: the India experience

Chronic renal failure is a devastating medical, social and economic problem for patients and their families. There is no data on the true incidence and prevalence of chronic renal failure in the developing world. Delayed diagnosis and failure of institution of measures to slow progression of renal failure result in a predominantly young ESRD population. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a low-priority area for healthcare planners in developing nations with two-tier healthcare delivery system. There is a severe shortage of nephrologists and hospitals offering dialysis and transplantation, more so in the poorest regions. There is a direct relationship between the number of dialysis centers and per capita gross national income of developing nations. Shortage in the number of government-funded hospitals has fanned the growth of a large number of private hospitals offering RRT. The high cost of hemodialysis (HD) puts it beyond the reach of all but the very rich and maintenance HD is the exclusively preserve of private hospitals. Government-run hospitals are busy with renal transplantation, which is the only realistic long term RRT option for a majority of patients. There are no state-funded or private health insurance schemes and patients have to raise finances for RRT on their own. Entire families are involved in such endeavors, with resulting loss of income of other family members too. A number of measures are utilized to bring down the RRT costs. For HD, these include cutting down the frequency of dialysis, use of cheaper cellulosic dialyzers, dialyzer reuse and nonutilization of expensive drugs like erythropoietin. Paradoxically, chronic peritoneal dialysis is more expensive than HD; patients use outdated connection systems and are suboptimally dialyzed on 3 exchanges/day. Most patients on dialysis are inadequately rehabilitated. Renal transplant recipients are forced to discontinue expensive drugs like cyclosporine after variable periods leading to high rates of graft loss. Financial considerations often preclude appropriate treatment of steroid-resistant rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. There is no organized cadaver donation program and an overwhelming majority of transplants are performed using living donors. This led to the practice of the sale of kidneys for transplant. To conclude, the financial burden of RRT in developing nations impacts on the lifestyle and future of entire families, and extracts a cost far higher than the actual amount of money spent on treatment.     

Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European Paediatric Nephrology Units

Background

Many factors may impact upon choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for children and adolescents, including patient and family choice, patient size and distance from the renal centre as well as logistic issues such as facilities and staffing at the unit. We report a survey of factors influencing treatment choice in 14 European paediatric nephrology units.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed by consensus and completed by 14 members of the European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group on facilities, staffing and family assessments impacting on choice of therapy as well as choice of therapy for 97 patients commencing initial RRT in 2011.

Results

All units offered all modalities of RRT, but there were limitations for pre-emptive transplantation (PET) and largely adult surgical dependence for creation of arteriovenous fistulae and transplantation. The average waiting time for a deceased donor kidney was 18.5 (range 3–36) months. Full time dietetic support was available in six of the 14 units. There was no social worker, psychology, play therapy or teaching support in three, two, seven and four units, respectively. Assessment by other members of the multidisciplinary team and home visits before choice of therapy was carried out in 50 % of units, and although all patients were discussed at team meetings, the medical opinion predominated. In terms of types of RRT, 50 % of patients were commenced on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD), 34 % on haemodialysis (HD) and 16 % underwent pre-emptive transplantation (PET). Chronic PD predominated in patients aged <5 years and HD predominated in those aged >10 years. Patient and family choice and age or size of patient were predominant factors in choice of therapy with a predictable decline in renal function favouring PET and social factors HD.

Conclusions

Chronic peritoneal dialysis predominated as primary choice of RRT, especially in younger children. The PET rates remain low. The influence of surgeons predominanted, and national transplant rules may be significant. Most units had insufficient multiprofessional support, which may impact upon initial choice of therapy as well as sustaining families through RRT.     

Polyomavirus BK Infection in End-stage Renal Disease: Analysis of Viral Replication in Patients on Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis

Patients in end-stage renal disease undergoing renal replacement treatment (ESRD-RRT) are considered immunocompromised. The hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) procedures seem to produce alterations of the immune status. Interest in immunosuppression has increased due to the poliomavirus BK (BKV) infection. Our study evaluated the prevalence of BKV infection in ESRD-RRT patients and viral replication on HD or PD. From 2006 to 2011 we selected 58 patients (34 males) in ESRD-RRT for inclusion in our study. BKV replication was evaluated by qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. In ESRD-RRT patients, the prevalence of BKV replication on plasma was 21%. We identified two groups of patients according to the dialysis procedure: 36 patients on HD (HD group) and 22 on PD (PD group). BKV replication in the HD group was 33% (12 of 36) versus 0% (0 of 22) in the PD group. Different age, number of months on RRT, and preserved diuresis was observed in the HD versus PD groups. With our results we can speculate that BKV infection in ESRD-RRT patients is linked to factors involved in the uremia-related immune dysfunction but also to specific mechanisms related to the different RRTs. PD is an option that could be associated with a better transplant outcome for patients undergoing kidney transplantation.     

1996 Hong Kong Renal Registry Report

Summary: This report was based on the data from the Renal Registry of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong and accounted for approximately 90-95% of all the patients on Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Hong Kong. Patients receiving treatment under the private sectors were not included in this report. the data were as of 31 December 1996. There were 15 renal units (2.4 unit per million population [pmp]) and four major renal transplant centres. the number of patients on RRT was 3337 (530 pmp), of which 56% (299 pmp) were on peritoneal dialysis (PD), 15% (79 pmp) on haemodialysis (HD) and 29% (152 pmp) with functioning kidney transplants (TX). the net increase in the number of patients on RRT was +12% from the previous year. the incidence of end stage renal failure was 640 (102 pmp). the median age of patients on RRT was 49 years, of which 27% were above the age of 61 years. For new patients who commenced on RRT during 1996, the median age was 56 years, of which 36% were above the age of 61 years. the causes of renal failure were glomerulonephritis 37%, unknown 30%, diabetes 13%, inherited and congenital 5%, infection/reflux 3%, hypertensive/renal vascular disease 3%, urolithiasis 2%, obstructive 1% and others 5%. For new patients entered into the programme during 1996, 25% were due to diabetic nephropathy. Ten per cent of all the patients on RRT were serologically positive for hepatitis B infection (PD 12%, HD 6%, TX 9%). 5% of all the patients on RRT were positive for hepatitis C infection (PD 3%, HD 12%, TX 7%). Seventy-nine per cent of all the patients on dialysis were on PD (1885 patients, 299 pmp), of which 96% were on CAPD. Thirty-eight per cent of the patients on CAPD were on straight-line systems, 35% on disconnecting systems and 20% on UV flash systems. Four-hundred and ninety-five patients (79 pmp) were on HD, of which 59% were on hospital based HD, 15% on satellite centre based HD, 10% on charitable centre based HD and 5% on home HD. Nine-hundred and fifty-seven patients (152 pmp) had a functioning kidney graft. 542 (57%) were transplanted in Hong Kong, of which 50% were cadaveric kidney transplantations. During 1996, 121 patients (19 pmp) received a kidney transplantation. Eighty-four transplants were performed in Hong Kong, of which 58 were with cadaveric kidneys and 26 with living related kidneys. the annual mortality rate for all RRT was 7.3% (10% for PD, 8% for HD and 1% with TX). the major causes of death were infection (28%), cardiovascular (26%) and cerebral vascular accident (9%). Outcome indicators were on patients entered into the RRT programme during 1995, thus allowing for 1 year of follow up. For CAPD as the first RRT, 1 year patient and technique survival (censored for death and non-technique failure) were 94% and 93%. For living related kidney transplants performed in Hong Kong, 1 year patient and graft survival (censored for death) were both 100%. For cadaveric kidney transplants, 1 year patient and graft survival were 98% and 96%     

The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis

Background:   Renal replacement therapy (RRT) consumes sizable proportions of health budgets internationally, but there is considerable variability in choice of RRT modality among and within countries with major implications for health outcomes and costs. We aimed to quantify these implications for increasing kidney transplantation and improving the rate of home-based dialysis.
Methods:   A multiple cohort Markov model was used to assess costs and health outcomes of RRT for new end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients in Australia for 2005–2010, using a health-care funder perspective. Patient characteristics and current practice patterns were based on the ANZDATA Registry. Two proposed changes were modelled: (i) increasing kidney transplants by between 10% and 50% by 2010; and (ii) increasing home haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) to the highest rates observed among Australian centres. We assessed costs (Australian dollars), survival and quality-adjusted survival, and cost-effectiveness.
Results:   The number of new ESKD patients in 2010 was estimated to be 2700, with annual RRT costs of about $A700 million; cumulative costs (2005–2010) were $A5 billion. Increasing transplants by 10–50% saves between $A5.8 and $A26.2 million, and increases quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 130–658 QALYs. Switching new patients from hospital HD to (i) home HD saves $A46.6 million by 2010; or (ii) PD saves $A122.1 million.
Conclusions:   These clinical practice changes reduce costs, improve patient quality of life and, in the case of transplantation, increase survival. Planning for RRT services should incorporate efforts to maximize rates of transplantation and to encourage home-based over hospital-based dialysis to optimize cost-effectiveness in RRT service delivery.     

Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world.

The worldwide incidence of kidney failure is on the rise and treatment is costly; thus, the global burden of illness is growing. Kidney failure patients require either a kidney transplant or dialysis to maintain life. This review focuses on the economics of dialysis. Alternative dialysis modalities are haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Important economic factors influencing dialysis modality selection include financing, reimbursement and resource availability. In general, where there is little or no facility or physician reimbursement or payment for PD, the share of PD is very low. Regarding resource availability, when centre HD capacity is high, there is an incentive to use that capacity rather than place patients on home dialysis. In certain countries, there is interest in revising the reimbursement structure to favour home-based therapies, including PD and home HD. Modality selection is influenced by employment status, with an association between being employed and PD as the modality choice. Cost drivers differ for PD and HD. PD is driven mainly by variable costs such as solutions and tubing, while HD is driven mainly by fixed costs of facility space and staff. Many cost comparisons of dialysis modalities have been conducted. A key factor to consider in reviewing cost comparisons is the perspective of the analysis because different costs are relevant for different perspectives. In developed countries, HD is generally more expensive than PD to the payer. Additional research is needed in the developing world before conclusive statements may be made regarding the relative costs of HD and PD.     

Improved survival in renal replacement therapy in Europe between 1975 and 1992. An ERA-EDTA Registry study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) is rising steadily, worldwide and in Europe. One reason for this is an increasing number of patients starting RRT, but improving survival on RRT may also be contributing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an ERA-EDTA Registry study we have examined survival of patients with Standard Primary Renal Disease, or Diabetes, aged 20 to 75 years, who started RRT with haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) between 1975 and 1992. Altogether close to a quarter of a million patients were included in the analysis which included conventional survival analysis of comparable subgroups of the whole cohort as well as Cox regression. RESULTS: After accounting for age, mode of initial treatment, and diagnosis, an improvement in survival of RRT patients was evident. From Cox regression it was calculated the risk for death decreased by about 5% annually during the time period 1975 1992. Patients who started RRT using PD experienced a higher mortality than those starting with HD. According to Cox regression the relative risk ratio for death was 1.25 for the whole period. The difference in survival between patients starting with PD or HD diminished during the observation period (1975-1992). DISCUSSION: The survival prospects of a patient presenting with end stage renal disease were considerably better in the early 1990s compared to the mid 1970s. This is reassuring despite the fact that mortality on RRT remains high. The higher mortality of RRT patients who started with PD is probably an 'historical' observation as the techniques of this treatment modality have improved considerably since the 1980s which was the time period from which came most of the data for the analysis.     

Assessment of health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients and dialysis patients

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming an important outcome measure in evaluation of various forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The Short Form-36 (SF-36), Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-24), and Zerssen's Mood Scale (Bf-S) are internationally validated questionnaires for the assessment of HRQoL. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the HRQoL of renal transplant recipients and compare it with that of patients on different forms of RRT. The study population consisted of: (1) 120 patients on hemodialysis (HD); (2) 43 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); (3) nine recipients who lost their grafts and went back to dialysis; (4) 120 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (controls); and (5) 48 renal transplant recipients. The mean SF-36 scores were not significantly different between control group and transplant recipients as well as HD and PD patients including previously transplanted patients. The dialysis patients scored significantly worse in all eight SF-36 domains compared with transplant recipients and healthy subjects. In all GBB-24 components, the transplant recipients scored significantly higher than HD and PD patients. In the “fatigue tendency,” “limb pain,” and “cardiac complaints” components, recipients scored significantly higher than control group subjects. The mood analysis (Bf-S) showed that the scores of transplant recipients and controls did not differ, being significantly higher than those of dialysis patients. The HRQoL of patients on HD and PD were similar and lower than that of the general population. Renal transplantation significantly improved HRQoL at least to the level of healthy individuals. Graft loss was associated with significant worsening of HRQoL.     

Comparing mortality of elderly patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score approach

The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in mortality over the first year of renal replacement therapy (RRT) between elderly patients starting treatment on hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD). For the period of 1991 to mid-1996, this study defined an inception cohort of all patients aged >65 yr with new-onset chronic RRT who were New Jersey Medicare and/or Medicaid beneficiaries in the year before RRT and who had been diagnosed with renal disease more than 1 yr before RRT. Propensity scores were calculated for first treatment assignment from a large number of baseline covariates. Mortality was then compared among patients initially assigned to HD versus PD using multivariate 90-d interval Cox models controlled for propensity scores and center stratification. Peritoneal dialysis starters had a 16% higher rate of death during the first 90 d of RRT compared with HD patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.42)]. Mortality did not differ between day 91 and 180 (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.51). Thereafter, PD starters again died at a higher rate (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.98). These findings were more pronounced among patients with diabetes. Sensitivity analyses using more stringent criteria to ensure that first treatment choice reflected long-term treatment choice confirmed the presence of an association between PD and mortality. In conclusion, compared with HD, peritoneal dialysis appears to be associated with higher mortality among older patients, particularly among those with diabetes, even after controlling for a large number of risk factors for mortality, propensity scores to control for nonrandom treatment assignment, and center stratification.     

Timely transfer of peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis improves survival rates

AIMS: The two main renal replacement therapies (RRT)--hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)--have been considered to be antagonistic in most published studies on the clinical outcomes of dialysis patients. Recently, it has been suggested that the complementary use of both modalities as an integrated care (IC) strategy might improve the survival rate of end-stage renal disease patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the final clinical outcome of PD patients when they transfer to HD because of complications related to PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the following patients that started RRT during the last 10 years: 33 PD patients (IC group; age 55 +/- 15 years, mean +/- SD) who transferred to HD, 134 PD patients (PD group, age 64 +/- 11 years) who remained in PD, and 132 HD patients (HD group, age 48 +/- 16 years) who started and continued in HD. The main reasons for the transfer to HD were relapsed peritonitis and loss of ultrafiltration, while various comorbid risk factors were adjusted by Cox hazards regression model (age, presence of diabetes or/and cardiovascular disease, serum hemoglobin and albumin levels, as well as the modality per se). RESULTS: 3- and 5-year survival rates for the IC, PD and HD groups were 97% and 81%, 54% and 28%, and 92% and 83%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in IC patients than in PD patients (p < 0.00001) but, was not different from that in HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the IC of dialysis patients undergoing RRT improves the survival of patients on PD if they are transferred to HD upon the appearance of PD related complications.     

Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in the Developing World: Challenges and Solutions

The prevalence of pediatric RRT and transplantation are low in developing countries, 6–12 and <1 to 5 per million child population (pmcp), respectively. This is due to low GDP/capita of <$10 000, government expenditure on health of <2.6–9% of GDP and paucity of facilities. The reported incidence of pediatric CKD and ESRD is <1.0–8 and 3.4–35 pmcp, respectively. RRT and transplantation are offered mostly in private centers in cities where HD costs $20–100/session and transplants $10 000–20 000. High costs and long distance to centers results in treatment refusal in up to 35% of the cases. In this backdrop 75–85% of children with ESRD are disfranchised from RRT and transplantation. Our center initiated an integrated dialysis–transplant program funded by a community‐government partnership where RRT and transplantation was provided “free of cost” with life long follow‐up and medication. Access to free RRT at doorsteps and transplantation lead to societal acceptance of transplantation as the therapy of choice for ESRD. This enabled us to perform 475 pediatric transplants in 25 years with 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival of 96% and 81%, respectively. Our model shows that pediatric transplantation is possible in developing countries when freely available and accessible to all who need it in the public sector.     

Cost analysis of renal replacement therapy by transplant in a system of bundled payment of dialysis

Renal replacement therapies (RRT) for patients with end-stage renal failure represent a high burden on European countries' healthcare budget. Our purpose was to report and compare the costs of RRT by hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) and renal transplantation (RT) after introduction of a bundled payment system of dialysis. We analyzed average annual cost of RT in a public national health system hospital - surgical/anesthesiologist team and material, induction and maintenance immunosuppression therapy, hospital stay, diagnostic examinations (DE), and post-transplant office visits (including DE). Incentives paid to hospitals performing RT were included. Annual cost of HD or PD was estimated by bundled payment established in a recently revised law - 537.25 €/wk. Total first year cost or RT is 61 658.14 € and from the second year forth 543.86 €/month. Dialysis costs 28 033.71 €/yr. Break-even point for cost is at 32 months, and from there on, RT is less expensive. Strategies aimed at increasing RT are needed as it confers better survival than RRT by dialysis with lower costs to Portuguese health system.     

Renal replacement therapy options from an Indian perspective: dialysis versus transplantation

In developing countries such as India, the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is largely guided by economic considerations. In the absence of health insurance plans, fewer than 10% of all patients receive renal replacement therapy (RRT). Hemodialysis (HD) is mainly a short-term measure to support ESRD patients prior to transplant. Infections are common in dialysis patients. The majority of patients starting HD die or are forced to abandon treatment because of cost constraints within the first 3 months. The cost of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is two times higher than that of HD, fewer than 2% of patients are started on PD. Among the three RRT options available, renal transplant is the preferred mode, as it is most cost-effective and provides a better quality of life. But due to financial constraints and nonavailability of organs, only about 5% of ESRD patients undergo transplant surgery. Though the removal of organs from brain-dead patients has been legalized, the concept of donation of organs from deceased donors has not received adequate social sanction. Only 2% of all transplants are performed from deceased donors. Due to limited access to RRT, the ideal approach should be to reduce the incidence of ESRD and attempt preventive measures. Preemptive transplant, reducing the duration of dialysis prior to transplant, use of immunosuppression for only up to 1 year, and availability of more deceased donor organs may be helpful to make RRT options within the reach of the common man.     

A look at dialysis delivery in Australia

Australia, in a sense, has as many dialysis delivery systems as it has states, with the differences in delivery systems being far greater between those states than is the case, for example, in the U.S. However, if common trends are apparent across the nation in dialysis delivery, they include: an increasing tendency to move HD delivery out of major teaching hospital centres into the community a modest decrease in PD use as more HD becomes available an increased role for the private sector in terms of HD delivery, ranging from direct facility ownership to pay-per-treatment arrangements in public hospitals an awareness of a need to make particular provision for the Aboriginal population, given their high rate of ESRD, their geographical dispersion, and their socio-economic deprivation. It will be interesting to observe how these processes evolve in the years ahead and whether these initiatives lead to "catch up" in Australia's incidence of treated ESRD relative to that of other Western countries.     

Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in a cohort of United States kidney dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Application of national guidelines regarding cardiovascular disease risk reduction to kidney dialysis patients is complicated by the conflicting observations that dialysis patients have a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but dialysis patients with higher serum cholesterol have lower mortality rates. Actual treatment patterns of hyperlipidemia are not well studied. METHODS: We assessed the prevalence, treatment and control of hyperlipidemia in this high-risk patient population from 1995 - 1998. We measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, treatment with a lipid-lowering agent, and prevalence of hyperlipidemia as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) II guidelines in 812 incident hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from dialysis clinics in 19 states throughout the United States. RESULTS: Hyperlipidemia was present in 40% of HD and 62% of PD patients. Among subjects with hyperlipidemia, 67% of HD and 63% of PD patients were untreated and only 22% of HD and 14% of PD patients were treated and controlled. Those who entered the study in 1997 or 1998, those with diabetes, males and Caucasians were more likely to be treated and controlled, whereas subjects on PD and those with ASCVD were less likely to be treated and controlled. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that high rates of undertreatment exist in the United States ESRD dialysis population. Whether improved rates of treatment will result in decreased cardiovascular disease events needs to be tested in randomized clinical trials.