Preoperative laparoscopy by local anesthesia for advanced gastric cancer

Preoperative laparoscopy by local anesthesia was performed in 8 patients with advanced gastric cancer, whose lesions had been diagnosed to be more than T3 or suspected to have peritoneal seeding, and its usefulness was assessed. After insertion of the trocars, the abdominal cavity was inspected, and biopsy and/or abdominal lavage sampling was performed. Three patients out of 8 were diagnosed as P3, and 5 patients were diagnosed as P0 and CY0. Based on these results, 6 patients underwent operation. The accuracy rate of diagnosis was 83% in P category, and 100% in CY category. In conclusion, it is considered that laparoscopy by local anesthesia is a useful preoperative examination for advanced gastric cancer.     

Depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis

Objective:Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended for the pretherapeutic staging of gastric cancer to detect any unexpected or unconfirmed intra-abdominal metastasis.The aim of this study was to evaluate the role and indications of diagnostic laparoscopy in the detection of intra-abdominal metastasis.Methods:Standard diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology examination was performed prospectively on patients who were clinically diagnosed with primary local advanced gastric cancer (cT≥2M0).We calculated the rate of intra-abdominal metastases identified by diagnostic laparoscopy,and examined the relationship between peritoneal dissemination (P) and cytology results (CY).Split-sample method was applied to find clinical risk factors for intra-abdominal metastasis.Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed in training set to find out risk factors of intra-abdominal metastasis,and then validate it in testing set.Results:Out of 249 eM0 patients,51 (20.5％) patients with intra-abdominal metastasis were identified by diagnostic laparoscopy,including 20 (8.0％) P1CY1,17 (6.8％) P0CY1 and 14 (5.6％) P1CY0 patients.In the training set,multivariate logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis showed that the depth of tumor invasion on computer tomography (CT) scan ≥21 mm and tumor-occupied ≥2 portions of stomach are predictive factors of metastasis.In the testing set,when diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on patients who had one or two of these risk factors,the sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting intra-abdominal metastasis were 90.0％ and 32.1％,respectively.Conclusions:According to our results,depth of tumor invasion and tumor-occupied portions of stomach are predictive factors of intra-abdominal metastasis.     

Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer

Background More accurate preoperative staging is necessary to determine the treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopy has been suggested as an appropriate staging modality. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of staging laparoscopy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods One hundred patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology. The disease stages determined were compared with those obtained by conventional methods. Results The disease stages were corrected after laparoscopy for 47 of the 100 patients (47%), with downstaging in 3 (3.0%) and upstaging in 44 (44%). Peritoneal deposits were found in 7 patients with peritoneal dissemination diagnosed by conventional examination. An unsuspected peritoneal deposit was found in 21 of 93 patients (22.6%), and unsuspected free cancer cells without deposits were found in 27 of 93 patients (29.0%). Gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 39 patients. Laparoscopy showed no peritoneal deposits in any of these patients. Free cancer cells were found in 9 patients (23.1%), but 4 of these had peritoneal deposits at operation. R0 resection was performed in 34 of the 39 patients (87.2%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 35 patients. All 35 patients underwent gastrectomy, which resulted in 27 R0 and 8 R2 resections. Of 18 patients with positive cytology at laparoscopy, 11 had no free cancer cells at operation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induced downstaging of the disease in 11 of the 18 patients with positive cytology (61.1%). Of 26 patients with massive peritoneal deposits, 4 underwent palliative resection because of pyloric stenosis. Twenty-two patients (22.0%) were able to avoid unnecessary laparotomy because of the staging laparoscopy. Conclusion Staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology is a safe, effective tool in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer

Staging laparoscopy was carried out for 12 cases of advanced primary gastric cancer to evaluate the condition of peritoneal seeding. Peritoneal seeding was indicated in five cases. Abdominal lavage sampling was positive in six cases. Among six cases with positive cytology, surgery was adopted in three cases to lessen bleeding or stricture. Chemotherapy were carried out for the other three cases. Radical lymph node resection was carried out in six cases without peritoneal seeding. Laparoscopic observation was easier and more feasible under general anesthesia than local anesthesia. Preoperative staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric carcinoma can evaluate the condition of peritoneal seeding. Based on the results, a suitable treatment plan for each patient can be determined.     

Evaluation of positive cases with peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer

Peritoneal dissemination with advanced gastric cancer is of significant problem. Peritoneal lavage cytology has been an effective method for the detection of early peritoneal dissemination since 1999. The accurate evaluation of peritoneal lavage cytology is unclear except for the same prognosis of peritoneal dissemination. We examined the clinical findings and the prognosis with positive cases in peritoneal lavage cytology. The prognosis of cases with P1CY1 or P2P3 group was poorer than in the P0CY1 or P0, CY1 group. We thus review the evaluation of peritoneal lavage cytology with gastric cancer in the Japanese and English literature. In addition, we describe the diagnosis of early peritoneal dissemination using peritoneal lavage tumor markers or molecular markers of peritoneal lavage.     

胃癌患者腹腔游离癌细胞的检测及其临床意义

腹腔播散是进展期胃癌常见的转移方式,由于目前尚没有标准的检测胃癌腹腔微转移的方法,故大部分腹腔微转移的胃癌患者难以得到临床诊断。应用腹腔灌洗细胞学(PLC)检测腹腔游离癌细胞(IFCCs)的结果与腹腔镜检查结果相似,但是腹腔镜结合PLC可增加检查的敏感性。应用免疫组化和酶联免疫吸附试验可检测腹腔灌洗液(PLF)中IFCCs肿瘤标志,IFCCs预测胃癌复发的阳性预报值为91%,特异性为97%。应用免疫组化检测IFCCs是一个有效的、独立的预测胃癌生存期的阴性指标。应用酶联免疫吸附试验检测PLF中CEA水平是预测腹腔播散的指标,其诊断腹腔微转移的敏感性和特异性分别是75.8%和90.8%。应用PLF进行分子诊断的敏感性优于PLC、免疫组化和酶联免疫吸附试验。逆转录聚合酶链式反应(RTPCR)是一种新的诊断腹腔灌洗液中IFCCs的方法,基于靶基因的RTPCR方法可用于检测腹腔微转移的肿瘤分子标志。在IFCCs中表达的这些分子标志还可用于腹腔微转移治疗。存在IFCCs的胃癌患者的预后很差,无论应用哪种方法预测腹腔微转移都是困难的,但术前均应进行IFCCs检查,以明确诊断和指导治疗。     

Treatment strategy for marginally resectable gastric cancer

It has been postulated that preoperative chemotherapy might promote tumor regression, eradicate nodal metastases, and improve resectability in patients with marginally resectable gastric cancer.For a marginally resectable tumor of gastric cancer, we selected the advanced gastric cancer patients with metastases and recurrences to the abdominal para-aortic lymph node (PAN), liver and invasion to the pancreas head and/or the duodenum.Patients with positive peritoneal cytology(P0, CY1)or localized peritoneal metastasis(P1), and Stage IV gastric cancer patients, were also considered candidates in this category. The strategy and results of surgical treatment for marginally resectable gastric cancer were explained as the dissection of PAN, hepatic resection, pancreaticoduodenectomy, perioperative chemotherapy for P0CY1 or P1, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Stage IV gastric cancer, which was still considered an experimental approach, although its use may be justified in unresectable or marginally resectable GC.The result of the resection of a marginally resectable gastric cancer is poor, but when there are no other non-curative factors, extended surgical resection should be performed because complete response is difficult at present with chemotherapy alone.In conclusion, there was no evidence suggesting that extended surgical procedures are effective, but a strategy of multidisciplinary treatment including extended surgical approach should be verified based on randomized controlled trials.     

A case of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination which showed the intraperitoneal CR by administrating TS-1 orally and paclitaxel intraperitoneally

A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer with pylorus stenosis, and the first abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a large amount of ascites. A staging laparoscopy revealed peritoneal dissemination and positive cytology for numerous amounts of ascites (s-T3(SE), N0, M0, p(+), cy(+), H0, s-Stage IV). The patient received TS-1 orally and paclitaxel administered to the peritoneal cavity. After finishing the second course of the combined chemotherapy, second-look staging laparoscopy was performed, which showed the disappearance of peritoneal dissemination and negative cytology. Chemotherapy combined with oral TS-1 and paclitaxel administered to the peritoneal cavity might be an effective strategy against advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.     

A successfully treated case of type 4 gastric cancer with intraperitoneal free cancer cells undergoing a curative resection followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin

A 41-year-old female complained of epigastric pain and was referred to our hospital. Gastrofiberscopy revealed that type 4 gastric cancer located at the whole gastric body. Although abdominal computed tomography showed that no distant metastasis but regional lymph node metastasis existed, staging laparoscopy and cytological diagnosis revealed that there were intraperitoneal free cancer cells without overt peritoneal metastasis(P0CY1). She received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for consecutive 21 days followed by 7 days of rest as a course. After 3 courses of the chemotherapy, intraperitoneal free cancer cells were not found, and she underwent curative gastrectomy. Pathological examination showed that the therapeutic effect was Grade 2. S-1 as postoperative chemotherapy had been prescribed for 10 months without relapse. However, she suffered from anorexia and abdominal distension and peritoneal metastasis was confirmed on the 575th day after curative operation. She has received a weekly paclitaxel therapy as second-line chemotherapy.     

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in staging gastric and oesophageal cancer.

AIMS: Accurate staging of gastric, oesophageal and oesophagogastric cancer is essential to avoid unnecessary laparotomies in patients where only palliation is appropriate. This requires a multimodal approach utilizing endoscopy, computed tomography and laparoscopy. Previous authors have found that the presence of free peritoneal tumour cells (FPTCs) detected at laparoscopy or laparotomy confers a poorer prognosis. However, various methods of peritoneal lavage are described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of our technique of peritoneal lavage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 88 staging laparoscopies with peritoneal lavage were carried out between March 1997 and February 1999 on patients eligible for attempted curative resection of a gastric, oesophageal or oesophagogastric cancer. During laparoscopy the pelvis was irrigated with 200 ml of normal saline, with 100 ml aspirated and examined cytologically. Patients were followed-up until September, 1999. RESULTS: 11 patients had FPTC-positive cytology with a median survival following laparoscopy of 122 days (95% CI 82-161) with only a single patient surviving more than one year. In the FPTC-negative group, median survival was 378 days (95% CI 256,-). Log-rank Chi(2)=16.7, P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of FPTCs detected by our technique is a contraindication to attempted curative resection - palliation only (medical or surgical) is appropriate. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.     

Surgery after intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology findings

Background

Despite recent progress in systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (P1) or positive peritoneal cytology findings (CY1) is still poor. We developed a regimen combining intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel (PTX) with S-1 and PTX, which can produce notable efficacy with regard to peritoneal lesions. Surgery after response to combination chemotherapy is a promising option for P1 or CY1 gastric cancer. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy.

Methods

This study enrolled 100 primary P1 or CY1 gastric cancer patients treated with IP PTX plus S-1 and PTX at the University of Tokyo Hospital between 2005 and 2011. Radical gastrectomy was performed when peritoneal cytology findings became negative, and the disappearance or obvious shrinkage of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by laparoscopy. The same chemotherapy regimen was restarted after surgery and repeated with appropriate dose reduction.

Results

Gastrectomy was performed in 64 (P1 56, P0CY1 8) of 100 (P1 90, P0CY1 10) patients. R0 resection was achieved in 44 patients (69%). The median survival time was 30.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.6–37.7 months] from the initiation of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and 34.6 months (95% CI 26.8–39.4 months) from the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage and pancreatic fistula, each in two patients, which were cured conservatively. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median survival time of the 36 patients who did not undergo surgery was 14.3 months (95% CI 10.0–17.8 months).

Conclusions

Surgery after response to intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy is safe and may prolong the survival of P1 and CY1 gastric cancer patients.

     

Strategy for patients with cytology positive and peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the strategy for patients with cytology positive and peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer. Thirty eight of POCY1, three of P1, eight of P2 and thirty six of P3 from advanced gastric adenocarcinoma at staging laparoscopy were studied. Gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 10 patients (Surgery group). NAC following gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 31 patients (NAC group) in POCY1, P1. The overall response rate was 29%, twenty of the 31 patients (65%) in the NAC group revealed no free cancer cells at the operation. The overall 5-year survival rate in 41 patients of POCY1, P1 was 15%. There was a significant deference in the overall survival curves between Surgery and NAC groups. The overall 2-year survival rate in 44 patients of P2, P3 was 9%. NAC for patients with positive cytology could lead into free cancer cells at a high rate, but not to improve their prognoses. An intensive chemotherapy including intra-abdominal chemotherapy should be necessary for these patients.     

Survival outcomes and prognostic indicators for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal wash cytology but no peritoneal metastasis after radical gastrectomy

BACKGROUNDPositive peritoneal wash cytology with no peritoneal metastasis (CY1P0) is a special type of distant gastric cancer metastasis, which describes a patient with positive peritoneal lavage cytology, but no definitive peritoneal metastasis, and there are no widely accepted treatment guidelines. We enrolled 48 primary CY1P0 gastric cancer patients treated by radical gastrectomy in this study. Our study illustrated the efficacy of radical gastrectomy for CY1P0 gastric cancer patients, and suggested that the pathological N factor and vascular invasion were significant independent risk factors for overall survival (OS). AIMTo assess the survival of CY1P0 gastric cancer patient post-radical gastrectomy, and to identify factors associated with long-term prognosis.METHODSOur study included 48 patients with primary CY1P0 gastric cancer who had radical gastrectomies at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China between 2013 and 2018. R0 resection was achieved in all 48 patients. Twelve patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thirty patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and four received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. OS statistics were available for 48 patients. Follow-up continued through March 2020. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify prognostic factors. RESULTSMedian OS was 22.0 mo (95% confidence interval: 13.366-30.634 mo) post-surgery. Univariate analyses demonstrated that tumor site (P = 0.021), pathological N factor (P = 0.001), pathological T factor (P = 0.028), vascular invasion (P = 0.046), and the level of CA199 prior to initiating therapy (P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for OS. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pathological N factor (P = 0.001) and vascular invasion (P = 0.031) were significant independent risk factors for OS.CONCLUSIONThis study suggested that radical gastrectomy may be efficient for CY1P0 gastric cancer patient post-radical gastrectomy and the pathological N factor and vascular invasion are significant independent risk factors for OS.     

A case report of scirrhous gastric carcinoma diagnosed by staging laparoscopy

The case is a sixty-something man with a complication of epigastric abdominal pain. X-ray and endoscopic examination of upper gastrointestinal tract showed a rigidity of the gastric wall and the presence of giant folds on gastric body and fornix. Scirrhous type of gastric cancer was suspected and gastric forceps biopsy was performed at many points under the retreated endoscopic examinations. However, the histologic findings revealed no malignant features. We performed staging laparoscopy, and by peritoneal washing cytology and biopsy of a nodule of abdominal wall, he was diagnosed with advanced gastric carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination. In conclusion, staging laparoscopy is one of the useful methods for diagnosis and determination of the management of scirrhous type gastric carcinoma.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and surgical resection for a mucinous gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

We herein report the case of a patient with mucinous gastric carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination that disappeared after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 alone. The patient has survived for over 23 months after surgery, without recurrence. A 60-year old man was referred to our hospital because of an advanced gastric cancer, detected by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at another hospital. Staging laparoscopy was performed on October 25, 2002, and revealed massive peritoneal dissemination. Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 were administered, at 120mg/day for 28 days, as one course. Total gastrectomy, with D2 lymph node dissection, was performed on January 24, 2003. The peritoneal dissemination had macroscopically disappeared and the cytology of the peritoneal lavage fluid was class III. His final diagnosis was gastric carcinoma, MLU, type 3, T2(SS), P0, H0, M0, N3, CY0, stage IV.     

Surgery after intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology findings

Background

Despite recent progress in systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (P1) or positive peritoneal cytology findings (CY1) is still poor. We developed a regimen combining intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel (PTX) with S-1 and PTX, which can produce notable efficacy with regard to peritoneal lesions. Surgery after response to combination chemotherapy is a promising option for P1 or CY1 gastric cancer. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy.

Methods

This study enrolled 100 primary P1 or CY1 gastric cancer patients treated with IP PTX plus S-1 and PTX at the University of Tokyo Hospital between 2005 and 2011. Radical gastrectomy was performed when peritoneal cytology findings became negative, and the disappearance or obvious shrinkage of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by laparoscopy. The same chemotherapy regimen was restarted after surgery and repeated with appropriate dose reduction.

Results

Gastrectomy was performed in 64 (P1 56, P0CY1 8) of 100 (P1 90, P0CY1 10) patients. R0 resection was achieved in 44 patients (69%). The median survival time was 30.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.6–37.7 months] from the initiation of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and 34.6 months (95% CI 26.8–39.4 months) from the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage and pancreatic fistula, each in two patients, which were cured conservatively. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median survival time of the 36 patients who did not undergo surgery was 14.3 months (95% CI 10.0–17.8 months).

Conclusions

Surgery after response to intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy is safe and may prolong the survival of P1 and CY1 gastric cancer patients.

     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

An early detection and treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination are rather difficult so that a clinical trial has been neglected. Therefore, we introduced a pre-operative peritoneal lavage diagnosis for gastric cancer patients with serosa-invaded tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced to patients with positive cytology and with no non-curative factors except peritoneum. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery was done safely. The patients with the disappearance of CY and P factors due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those with positive results of CY or R However, many of the patients with negative results from peritoneum eventually suffered a peritoneal recurrence. We started another protocol study with S-1 and an intra-peritoneal chemotherapy using docetaxel. The efficacy in the protocol result will be expected.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with positive cytology from advanced gastric cancer

Free cancer cells from advanced gastric cancer are associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with positive cytology from advanced gastric cancer. Thirty four patients with positive cytology and no macroscopic peritoneal deposits from advanced gastric adenocarcinoma at staging laparoscopy were studied. Gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 9 patients (Surgery group). NAC following gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 25 patients (NAC group). The overall response rate was 24% (CR in none, PR in 6, NC in 15, PD in 4). Two of the 4 patients with PD did not undergo surgical resection. Twenty three patients in the NAC group (resection rate 92%) underwent gastrectomy, which resulted in 17 R0, four R1, and two R2 resections. Eighteen of the 23 patients (78%) in the NAC group revealed no free cancer cells at operation. There was no significant deference in the overall survival curves between Surgery and NAC groups. Five of the 17 patients performed curative operation developed recurrence (peritoneum in 1, liver in]1, brain in 1, local and peritoneum in 1, paraaortic lymph node and peritoneum in 1). NAC for patients with positive cytology could lead into no free cancer cells at a high rate, but not to improve their prognoses. An intensive chemotherapy after gastrectomy should be necessary for these patients.     

Prognostic significance of tumor markers in peritoneal lavage in advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: Predicting peritoneal dissemination of cancer is very difficult whatever method of examination is used. Recently, a cytological examination of peritoneal lavage has been shown to be a feasible measure to predict an early state of peritoneal seeding. The predictive value of the levels of tumor markers in peritoneal lavage for peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma was thus studied. METHODS: In 229 patients gastric cancer tumor markers, CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9, in peritoneal lavage were intraoperatively evaluated using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: CEA in peritoneal lavage at a cutoff level of 0.5 ng/ml showed overall a higher sensitivity of 75.8% at a specificity of 90.8% for a diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination including cytologically positive peritoneal lavage [CY(+)] than CA 125 or CA 19-9 in peritoneal lavage. The CEA level in peritoneal lavage as well as both serosal invasion and the CA 125 level in peritoneal lavage were significant factors for the prediction of peritoneal dissemination including CY(+) with a relative risk of 6.6, 14.1 and 9.4. In patients undergoing curative operations, the recurrence rate for peritoneal dissemination and liver metastasis in cases with CEA levels in peritoneal lavage of > or = 0.5 ng/ml was significantly higher than that in cases with CEA levels of < 0.5 ng/ml (p < 0.0001, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These finding suggest that the CEA level in peritoneal lavage is thus considered to be a predictor of peritoneal dissemination including CY(+).     

The treatment strategy for type 4 gastric cancer with positive lavage cytology--a decision making of the therapeutic strategy by the change of the result of the lavage cytology

It has been difficult to improve the prognosis of the type 4 advanced gastric cancer because the peritoneal dissemination develops frequently. In the present study, the therapeutic strategy, an administration of chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy, for the type 4 advanced gastric cancer with positive lavage cytology (CY) was discussed. CY has changed to negative in 3 of 6 cases (50%) at the surgery and in 1 of another 3 cases during the post operative chemotherapy. MST was 1487 days (966-2354 days) in cases with negative CY after pre-operative treatment, while 193 and 395 days in another 2 cases remained in positive CY, respectively. It may be important to perform re-staging laparoscopy with the evaluation of CY after preoperative chemotherapy for the type 4 advanced gastric cancer with positive CY, because the survival was comparatively better in cases with the change from positive CY to negative CY after the treatment. In conclusion, the treatment strategy for the type 4 advanced gastric cancer with positive CY was to administer chemotherapy followed by curative intent surgery for the case with negative CY after pre-operative treatment, while the other regimen of chemotherapy administration for the case with positive CY remained.