应用全盆底重建术治疗老年女性重度盆腔器官脱垂临床分析

目的 评价全盆底重建术治疗老年女性重度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效.方法 回顾性分析34例POP-QⅢ～Ⅳ期盆腔器官脱垂行全盆底重建术的老年患者临床资料,评价该手术疗效及对患者生活质量的影响.结果 所有手术均安全顺利进行,未见膀胱、直肠等损伤;手术时间（105±31.2） min,出血（185.4±65.9） mL;所有患者术后4～5d后均自主排尿.随访2年,复发率为0（0/34）;PFIQ评分由术前的（84.3±22.6）分降至术后2年的（11.2±6.5）分,PFDI评分由术前的（75.8±19.4）分降至术后2年的（12.4±5.3）分.结论 全盆底重建术用于纠正老年女性重度盆腔器官脱垂,手术安全,术后生活质量改善明显,值得临床推广应用.     

盆底三维超声在老年女性盆腔器官脱垂诊断中的应用

目的 观察老年女性盆腔器官脱垂时三维超声检查时各参数水平,分析盆底三维超声在老年女性盆腔器官脱垂中的诊断价值.方法 回顾分析2017年4月至2019年4月确诊的100例老年盆腔器官脱垂女性患者的病历资料为观察组,另选取同时期来院就诊并确诊为其他非盆腔器官脱垂85例为对照组,全部患者接受盆底三维超声检查,比较两组超声检查...     

Prolift盆底重建术治疗老年重度盆腔器官脱垂的临床分析

目的研究Prolift盆底重建术在老年重度盆腔器官脱垂(pelvic organ prolapse,POP)患者中的临床应用价值,为治疗该病症提供方法。方法回顾性分析2015年3月-2019年3月于本院接受住院治疗的87例重度POP患者临床资料,按治疗方法差异分为观察组(n=44)和对照组(n=43)。观察组采取Prolift盆底重建术治疗,对照组采取传统阴式子宫切除术及阴道前后壁修补术治疗。评估并比较2组手术指标、术前及术后盆底肌力、生活质量、术后并发症和复发情况。结果观察组的手术时间明显短于对照组,术中出血量明显少于对照组,术后残余尿量明显多于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后1年的盆底肌静态张力、动态张力及收缩力均比同组术前及对照组术后1年升高(P<0.05),而2组术后1年肌电位差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年时,2组各项生活质量评分均较同组术前显著降低(P<0.05),而观察组评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率及术后复发率均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论Polifl盆底重建术可治疗老年重度POP,疗效确切,创伤小,安全性高;在保留子宫的同时,可完成盆底结构重建,促进盆底肌肉功能的恢复,是治疗老年POP的有效方法。     

盆腔重建Prolift手术对老年女性重度盆腔器官脱垂的临床疗效

<正>盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是由多种原因导致的盆底肌肉、韧带支持薄弱,引起盆腔脏器移位,连锁引发其他盆腔器官的位置和功能异常。随着人类寿命延长和老龄化加速,POP发病率呈上升趋势,严重影响中老年女性身体健康和生活质量〔1³〕。目前,手术是治疗中重度POP的重要方法之一,但传统手术术后患者复发率较高〔4〕。因此,本研究通过观察Prolift盆腔重建术治疗老年女性POP的临床疗效,为临床治疗提高参考。     

女性盆腔器官脱垂的影响因素

目的探讨女性盆腔器官脱垂(POP)发病的相关因素对生活质量的影响。方法于2009年1～8月随机调查在长春市某医院妇产科门诊就诊及住院病人的POP发病情况、绝经情况、生育史、排尿异常状况、生活质量等项目;对获得的583例调查者的有效资料进行统计分析。结果 POP主要发生在45岁以上妇女,特别是绝经5年以上者,表现出随着年龄增加,POP发病率逐步升高的趋势。POP的患病率随分娩次数增加而显著升高(P<0.01)。64.9%的POP患者同时伴有排尿异常,远高于非POP者(20.8%)(P<0.01)。POP患者感到对性生活和日常生活有影响,只有22.7%POP患者就诊过,64.9%的患者未经过治疗。结论患者年龄越大、绝经时间越久,女性POP发病率越高;妇女多次妊娠和分娩增加了POP发病率。POP常常伴随着排尿异常,且大多数患者认识不足。应针对影响因素进行有针对性的预防,做好疾病知识、计划生育工作的宣传,指导妇女进行缩肛锻炼,提高盆底组织的支持力。     

全盆底网片悬吊术治疗老年妇女盆腔器官脱垂疗效观察

目的观察全盆底网片悬吊术治疗老年妇女盆腔器官脱垂（POP）的疗效。方法对15例同时伴有子宫（穹窿）、阴道前后壁脱垂的POP患者行全盆底网片悬吊术治疗。结果 15例患者手术顺利,手术时间68～150min,术中出血量150～500 ml,无输血病例,无直肠及膀胱损伤。住院时间5～9 d。术后随访1～18个月,盆底结构正常,POP均未复发。4例器官脱垂症状改善,5例腰骶部不适消失,9例便秘消失,11例压力性尿失禁治愈。术后发生网片侵蚀伴阴道分泌物增多症状1例,修剪侵蚀的网片后恢复正常。结论全盆底网片悬吊术治疗老年妇女POP能实现全盆底解剖和功能重建,近期疗效较好。     

两种术式治疗女性重度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效

目的比较prolift盆底重建系统与传统阴式子宫全切术及阴道前后壁修补术加骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗女性重度盆腔器官脱垂的应用效果。方法回顾分析该院2009年1月至2011年9月治疗患有POP-Q分期Ⅲ～Ⅴ期的患者30例,其中采用prolift盆底重建术14例,其他患者采用传统术式,比较两组患者的手术效果、术后并发症、手术情况(手术时间及出血量),并进行统计学分析。结果 Prolift组手术时间及出血量明显少于阴式子宫全切术及阴道前后壁修补术加骶棘韧带悬吊术组(P<0.05),POP-Q分期评价两组患者术后阴道Aa、Ba、C、Ap、Bp位点均得到显著改善,解剖疗效明显。结论两种术式应用于纠正女性重度盆腔器官脱垂都是安全可行的,但术后复发率、手术时间、手术出血量、手术并发症等方面,pro-lift盆底重建系统优于传统阴式子宫全切术加阴道前后壁修补术及骶棘韧带悬吊术。     

应用不可吸收网片盆底重建术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效

目的探讨不可吸收网片应用于盆底重建术(TPMR)的可行性及有效性。方法网片组300例盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者,在阴道前壁或后壁置入不可吸收的由聚丙烯材料制成的网片,根据国际尿控协会制定的盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)分度法,评价手术效果。疗效评定以术后无阴道壁脱垂为治愈,随访1⁷2个月。结果网片组300例手术顺利。手术平均时间为6072个月。结果网片组300例手术顺利。手术平均时间为60⁹0 min,术中出血平均为100 ml。患者术后恢复良好,住院时间平均7 d。术后随访390 min,术中出血平均为100 ml。患者术后恢复良好,住院时间平均7 d。术后随访3⁷2个月。PFIQ-7评分显示,患者膀胱或排尿症状、直肠或排便症状、阴道或盆腔症状3方面在术后372个月。PFIQ-7评分显示,患者膀胱或排尿症状、直肠或排便症状、阴道或盆腔症状3方面在术后3⁷2个月内均显著改善(P<0.05)。根据POP-Q评分标准,网片组术后6年内各指示点较术前明显复位,均无阴道壁膨出,30例网片暴露侵蚀阴道黏膜,3例术后排尿困难,3例膀胱损伤,1例直肠损伤。结论网片在子宫脱垂、阴道前后壁脱垂、膀胱膨出、直肠膨出、穹窿膨出修补手术中应用,操作简单,手术复发率低,网片暴露、侵蚀的并发症仍有待解决。     

阴道全封闭术治疗老年女性盆腔器官脱垂的疗效

目的 分析老年女性盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者实施阴道全封闭术的临床疗效及安全性.方法 选取2012年1月至2018年1月在佛山市妇幼保健院妇科住院治疗、盆腔器官脱垂分期法(POP-Q)评定为Ⅲ～Ⅳ期、并接受阴道全封闭术治疗的78例老年POP患者.所有患者治疗后进行1年随访观察,记录术前和术后POP-Q分期情况.分析患者...     

改良盆底重建术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂疗效观察

目的观察改良盆底重建术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效。方法50例盆腔器官脱垂患者,随机分为对照组和观察组各25例。对照组采用传统盆底重建术,观察组行改良盆底重建术。结果两组患者手术顺利。观察组阴道前壁脱垂全部得到纠正;随访1a均未出现复发;未见手术并发症。对照组6例复发,2例发生尿潴留,2例阴道聚丙烯补片修补术后发生侵蚀。观察组保留尿管时间和平均住院天数均明显少于对照组（P均〈0．05）。结论改良盆底重建术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂安全有效。     

中老年女性盆腔器官脱垂患者尿动力学检查106例临床分析

目的探讨女性盆腔脏器脱垂（pelvic organ prolapse,POP）的尿动力学特点,了解盆腔脏器脱垂与压力性尿失禁（stress urinary incontinence,SUI）的关系。方法对2006年1月至2009年12月在本院就诊的106例女性盆腔脏器脱垂患者,采用盆腔脏器脱垂评估分类法（pelvic organ prolapse quantitative examination,POP-Q）评估,并进行尿动力学检查,测定尿动力学参数,对结果进行统计学分析。结果 106例盆腔脏器脱垂患者中,合并SUI 76例（Ⅰ型SUI 36例,Ⅱ型24例,Ⅲ型16例）（71.7%,76/106）,混合性尿失禁10例（9.4%,10/106）。结论盆腔脏器脱垂与SUI密切相关。尿动力学检查在女性盆腔脏器脱垂的诊断治疗方面具有重要指导意义。     

Management of pelvic organ prolapse

Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse can afflict up to 10% of women. Urinary incontinence, voiding dysfunction or difficulty possibly related to bladder outlet obstruction are common symptoms. Infrequently hydronephrosis or defecatory dysfunction can be seen. The management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should start with adequate assessment of all pelvic floor complaints. If a patient is not symptomatic, surgical intervention is usually not indicated. While the use of a variety of graft materials are available today including porcine, dermal and synthetic grafts, that are used in some surgical approaches to pelvic organ prolapse, other more conservative approaches may prove beneficial to many patients. This article describes our approach to the patient with pelvic organ prolapse.     

Frequency of anal incontinence and results of pelvic viscerography in 291 women with pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of anal incontinence in a population of 291 women with pelvic organ prolapse and evaluate the results of pelvic viscerogram in this situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient answered a standardized questionnaire on medical, obstetric and surgical past histories and answers were logged in a database. The viscerograms were performed by a single specialized radiologist. RESULTS: All patients but one were parous. The prevalence of anal incontinence was 26.1%. Stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence were significantly associated with anal incontinence. No obstetric or surgical risk factor for anal incontinence was demonstrated. Viscerography demonstrated rectoceles (n=86, 29.1%), enteroceles (n=77, 26.5%), cystoceles (n=174, 59.8%), and intra-anal rectal prolapse (n=106, 36.4%). A significant association was found between intra-anal rectal prolapse and anal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence is frequent in patients with pelvic organ prolapse, even more so in the presence of urinary incontinence, and should be investigated by pelvic viscerography. Pelvic floor dysfunction is frequently associated with enteroceles, rectoceles and rectal prolapse. Pelvic viscerograms should be systematically performed in the diagnostic work-up in patients with pelvic organ prolapse when surgical treatment is considered.     

Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Attitudes to sexuality and the psychological value of reproductive organs have changed in Western countries over the last few decades. Nevertheless, repair of pelvic support defects with concomitant hysterectomy is still considered the standard treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Over the last 10 years, however, interest has been growing in uterus-sparing surgery, which can be divided into vaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic procedures. The majority of studies on uterus-sparing surgery, with the exception of abdominal techniques, report few cases with short follow-up. Sacrospinous hysteropexy is the most studied vaginal technique for uterus preservation and favorable results have been demonstrated, although the majority of studies are flawed by selection and information bias, short follow-up and lack of adequate control groups. Abdominal and laparoscopic procedures are promising, providing similar functional and anatomical results to hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Consensus is growing that the uterus can be preserved at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery in appropriately selected women who desire it. The results of comparison trials and prospective studies confirm that uterus-sparing surgery is feasible and is associated with similar outcomes to hysterectomy, as well as shorter operating times. Surgeons should be ready to respond to the wishes of female patients who want to preserve vaginal function and the uterus.     

Assessing and treating pelvic organ prolapse

At least half of all women who have given birth experience pelvic organ prolapse, a condition where pelvic organs protrude through the vagina. Because of the presentation of the different aspects of prolapse, treatment had become compartmentalized in line with pelvic involvement, with urologists, gynecologists, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists each addressing their field of expertise. In addition, urinary or fecal incontinence, urinary retention, and urinary tract infections often are associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Both pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence have a significant impact on the quality of life. New training programs in urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery are producing clinicians who are better equipped to treat pelvic organ prolapse, as well as related urinary and fecal incontinence. This article provides an overview of the various aspects of pelvic organ prolapse for all clinicians involved in assessment, treatment, and potential prevention of this condition.