The management of femur shaft fracture associated with severe traumatic brain injury

The aim of this article is to describe the management of femoral shaft fractures in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a major problem and two questions remain currently of interest: When and how to perform orthopedic surgery in severe TBI patients? The main point of perioperative management remains the prevention of secondary brain insults and the monitoring of intracranial pressure is essential especially in patients with intracranial lesions on the CT-scan. The “double hit” concept, suggesting that surgery by itself might increase the preexisting systemic inflammatory response, gives argument for very early or delayed surgery. Early definitive femoral osteosynthesis, if requires lengthy surgical procedure, does not seem appropriate in this context and “damage-control orthopedics” with external fixation seems to be a good alternative.     

Surgical management of persistent post-traumatic trans-tentorial brain hernia

IntroductionTemporal engagement may persist after etiologic surgical treatment of acute subdural hematoma (ASH) without clinical improvement despite normalized intracranial pressure (ICP). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of secondary direct temporal lobe disengagement (DTLD) after surgery for supratentorial ASH and to evaluate clinical outcome.Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 4 patients undergoing secondary DTLD. Patient data were recorded at admission, pre- and postoperatively and at 6 months’ follow-up (FU): age, gender, Rotterdam score, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), neurological deficits, oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP), ICP, midline shift, complications and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E).ResultsAt postoperative evaluation 48 h after DTLD, we observed a significant improvement in GCS score (initial 6 ± 3, preoperative 7 ± 3, postoperative 14 ± 1; P = 0.02), midline shift (initial 16 ± 3 mm, preoperative 13 ± 5 mm, postoperative 9 ± 2 mm; P = 0.049) and ONP (P = 0.01). In all cases, early postoperative imaging documented visualization of a patent ipsilateral peri-mesencephalic cistern. At 6-month FU, GOS-E showed 75% good recovery and 25% disability. Complete ONP recovery was observed in 75% of patients (P = 0.01). Neurological deficits were present at FU in 25% of patients. No surgery-related complications or mortality were recorded.ConclusionsIn traumatic brain injury, secondary DTLD may allow simple, effective and safe management of trans-tentorial uncal herniation, avoiding more challenging procedures. Clinical results are promising, as this technique seems to favorably influence neurological outcome in this selected subgroup of patients with persistent clinical and radiological signs of temporal engagement after etiological treatment with normal ICP values.     

Evaluation of neurosurgical training of French military surgeons prior to their deployment

BackgroundA specific training course was formalized in 2007 in order to facilitate the management of cranio-encephalic injuries by French military general surgeons during deployment, within the Advanced Course for Deployment Surgery (ACDS). The objective is to evaluate the neurosurgical pre-deployment training course attended by the military surgeons.MethodsFrom June 2019 to September 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in the form of a digital self-completed questionnaire, addressed to all graduated military surgeons working in the French Military Training Hospitals. The survey included: (1) a knowledge assessment; and (2) a self-assessment of the training course. The participating surgeons were classified into two groups according to their participation (group 1) or not (group 2) in the neurosurgical module. The main outcome was the score received on the knowledge assessment.ResultsAmong the 145 military surgeons currently in service, 76 participated in our study (53%), of which 49 were classified in group 1 (64%) and 27 in group 2 (36%). Group 1 surgeons had a significantly higher score than Group 2 at the knowledge assessment (mean 21.0 ± 7.1 vs. 17.8 ± 6.0, P = 0.041). The most successful questions were related to TBI diagnosis and surgical technique, while the least successful questions dealt with “beyond emergency care” and surgical indications.ConclusionThe French pre-deployment neurosurgical training course provides a strong neurosurgical background, sufficient to perform life-saving procedures in a modern conflict situation. However, neurosurgical specialized advice should be solicited whenever possible to assist the in-theatre surgeon in surgical decisions.