Tenofovir and abacavir combination therapy: lessons learned from an urban clinic population

Regimens containing abacavir (ABC), tenofovir (TDF), and lamivudine (3TC) have recently been demonstrated to have high failure rates. This poses a clinical dilemma of how to manage patients currently being treated with other regimens containing tenofovir/abacavir. We evaluated the outcomes of tenofovir/abacavir regimens in our clinical practice through a retrospective review of 2655 charts. Two hundred patients (7%) were on a tenofovir/abacavir-containing regimen. Fifty-nine patients met the criteria for analysis and were grouped into three groups: (1) antiretroviral na?ve, (2) virally suppressed patients switched to TDF/ABC, and (3) patients with failure of their first antiretroviral regimen. Rates of viral suppression in the na?ve, switch, and first-failure groups were 95%, 86%, and 46%, respectively. In the first-failure group, viral suppression was 66% without and 18% with a preexisting M184V. A composite analysis of the groups revealed a success rate of 86% when the regimen contained zidovudine (ZDV) and 62% when it did not. No K65R mutations were noted. These findings support continued caution in the use of TDF/ABC in combination. However, these data suggest that this combination may be successfully used in selected situations such as in combination with ZDV. In patients already virally suppressed on a TDF/ABC-containing regimen, considerations include continuing the regimen or adding zidovudine, in the attempt to protect against the development of a K65R mutation and/or virologic failure, versus changing a stable regimen.     

Zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir plus tenofovir in HIV-infected naive patients: a 96-week prospective one-arm pilot study

We evaluated a single-class quadruple nucleoside/nucleotide regimen in a 96-week prospective one-arm pilot study in adult HIV-infected naive patients with CD4 >100 cells/microl. Standard zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir and tenofovir doses were given. Virologic efficacy was evaluated by intent-to-treat (ITT), switch = failure and on-treatment (OT) analyses. A total of 54 patients were included (median CD4 count 254 cells/microl, VL 79,706 copies/ml). A median drop in VL of 2 log at 14 days and >3 log since week 12 was observed. A total of 34/54 (63%) patients (ITT) and 34/39 (87%) patients (OT) had VL <50 copies/ml at 96 weeks. Four (7%) patients switched therapy due to adverse events, 5 (9%) had virologic failure, and 1 died. Similar efficacy results were observed irrespective of baseline VL (> or <5 log) or CD4 cells (> or <250/microl). A median CD4 gain of +223 cells/microl was achieved. K65R + 41L + 219Q were detected in one patient at virologic failure. Only two patients presented fat loss on clinical evaluation. A decrease in total cholesterol (p = 0.007) and LDLc (p = 0.016) was observed. Our data suggest that zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir plus tenofovir is a simple, effective, and well-tolerated NNRTI/PI-sparing regimen, even for patients with high viral loads. Larger trials comparing this option with standard initial antiretroviral regimens should be conducted.     

Tenofovir monotherapy is effective in hepatitis B patients with antiviral treatment failure to adefovir in the absence of adefovir-resistant mutations

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to identify mutations associated with treatment failure to adefovir (ADV) and to determine virologic response to tenofovir (TDF) alone and in combination with emtricitabine (FTC) in these patients. METHODS: Serum samples prior to and after the change in treatment to TDF/TDF+FTC from 13 patients were analyzed by direct sequencing and clonal analysis. RESULTS: ADV-resistant mutations, rtA181V and rtN236T, were detected on direct sequencing in 3 of 8 patients who had virologic breakthrough. Among patients with suboptimal virologic response, rtA181T, rtI233V, and rtN236T were present on clonal analysis in 3 patients. Ten patients received TDF, 8 achieved virologic response. One had ADV-resistance at baseline and persistence of ADV-resistant mutations during TDF treatment, addition of FTC resulted in a further decrease in HBV DNA. Another patient had no ADV-resistance at baseline, and selection of ADV-resistant mutations during TDF treatment. All 3 patients who received TDF+FTC had undetectable HBV DNA within 3-12 months including 2 who had ADV-resistance at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy is effective for patients with virologic breakthrough or suboptimal response to ADV, but combination therapy with a nucleoside analogue should be considered in patients with ADV-resistance. No novel mutations were detected.     

A two-year follow-up of zidovudine plus lamivudine combined with indinavir in antivival naive HIV-infected patients

Efficacy of a 3-drug combination (Zidovudine (AZT) + Lamivudine (3TC) + Indinavir (IDV)) has been evaluated in 17 anti-viral naive patients with HIV infection for 24 months. Our genotypic resistance assay was able to analyze more than 80% of the patients whose viral load (VL) was over 3,000 copies/ml. This therapy was continued in 11 patients (65%) for 24 months. Among them, VL was undetectable (VL < 400 copies/ml) in patients at 24 month (47% by intent-to-treat, 72% by on treatment). Of the 11 patients, a 3TC resistance-related mutantion was detected in only one case. The therapy was discontinued in 6 cases. Main reasons of the discontinuation were side effects. However, if the therapy was switched to other combinations when VL was undetectable, VL remained undetectable in 5 cases at 24 month.     

Presence of M184I/V in minor HIV-1 populations of patients with lamivudine and/or didanosine treatment failure

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of M184I/V in minor HIV-1 populations of patients who failed lamivudine (3TC) and/or didanosine (ddI) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen 3TC-experienced patients who, after switching therapy to a ddI regimen, had a new failure without M184I/V in the major viral population were included in the study. Ninety plasma samples were analysed by direct sequencing and selective real-time polymerase chain reaction (SPCR), which detects GTG/GTA and ATA mutants down to 1 and 0.2% of the population, respectively. RESULTS: In five samples, SPCR detected resistant virus when direct sequencing detected wild-type M184. In patients with mixed viral populations at sequencing, the median proportion of mutants detected by SPCR was 30%. SPCRGTG reactivity dominated, while SPCRATA reactivity only was uncommon. M184I/V disappeared in patients in whom 3TC was stopped but ddI continued. Ten patients with ddI failure had no M184I/V. CONCLUSIONS: Minor HIV-1 strains may harbour M184I/V in patients failing ddI therapy, despite direct sequencing showing wild-type virus. Although M184I/V may reduce the genetic barrier of ddI for mutations such as K65R and L74V, the lack of re-emergence of M184I/V in the minor quasispecies of most patients who failed ddI suggests that M184I/V was not a preferred route to ddI resistance in our patient population.     

Prolonged use of tenofovir in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected individuals does not lead to HBV polymerase mutations and is associated with persistence of lamivudine HBV polymerase mutations

Objectives

The aim of the study was to identify and characterize hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase gene mutations associated with ongoing HBV replication in HIV/HBV‐coinfected individuals receiving tenofovir (TDF).

Methods

This retrospective cross‐sectional study identified 28 HIV/HBV‐coinfected individuals who had received TDF for at least 3 months. All patients had samples available while receiving TDF (on‐TDF), and 24 also had samples available prior to treatment (pre‐TDF). Case records were reviewed to obtain clinical and virological data at the times of sampling (±3 months). The HBV DNA of all samples was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the polymerase region of PCR‐positive samples was sequenced and compared with reference HBV data.

Results

Of the pre‐TDF samples, 15 of 24 (63%) were HBV PCR positive. Of the on‐TDF samples, four of 28 (14%) were HBV PCR positive (mean time on TDF 13.5 months; range 3–23 months). Lamivudine (3TC)‐resistance mutations were detected in three of four (75%) of these viraemic samples. The previously identified putative TDF‐resistance mutations, rtA194T+rtL180M+rtM204V, were not detected in any individual.

Conclusions

Unique mutations in the HBV polymerase gene associated with TDF resistance are rare in HIV/HBV coinfection. 3TC‐resistance mutations persist and a significant proportion of patients are HBV PCR positive despite the addition of TDF.     

黑龙江省未经治疗的艾滋病患者蛋白酶和反转录酶基因型耐药性检测与分析

目的 对黑龙江省流行的HIV-1毒株的蛋白酶基因及反转录酶基因进行基因型耐药分析,为开展大规模临床抗病毒治疗提供本底数据.方法 采用套式-PCR法扩增黑龙江省内49例HIV-1感染者及AIDS患者外周血单个核细胞中前病毒cDNA的部分蛋白酶和反转录酶基因,分析基因序列,与国际耐药数据库比对,分析耐药变异.结果 49例患者HIV毒株亚型分析为B'亚型.在扩增出蛋白酶基因的47份标本中,未发现对蛋白酶抑制剂的原发突变,但发现大量对蛋白酶抑制剂的次要突变,V771占91.5%、L63P占76.6%、I93L占74.5%、E35D占61.7%、R57K占19.1%、R41K占10.6%、A71V占8.5%、M36I占8.5%、L10I占6.4%、D60E占6.4%、L89M占4.2%和G16E占2.1%.在扩增出反转录酶基因的44份标本中,1份有反转录酶抑制剂的原发突变M184I,占2.3%,均有反转录酶抑制剂的次要突变,I135L/T/R/V占81.8%、V106I占22.7%、V179D/E占11.4%、R211K占9.1%、L214F占4.5%、V189I占4.5%和V108I占2.3%.结论 目前在黑龙江省未接受抗反转录病毒治疗的患者中未发现对蛋白酶抑制剂耐药的原发突变,耐药突变处于低水平,但应及时进行耐药突变检测,防止多重耐药和交叉耐药的出现和流行.     

The efficacy of combined zidovudine and lamivudine compared with that of combined zidovudine,lamivudine and nelfinavir in asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children

In this 6-month prospective study, we compared the efficacy of two treatment regimens: double-drug therapy with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) and triple-drug therapy with ZDV plus 3TC plus nelfinavir (NFV), in the treatment of asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children. Twenty-five children were enrolled in this study and were divided into 2 groups: group A, consisting of 13 children who were given ZDV+3TC; group B, consisting of 12 children who were given ZDV+3TC+NFV. Serial determinations of weight, CD4-cell count, HIV RNA or plasma viral load (VL) and complete blood counts (CBC), liver function tests (LFT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) tests, creatinine and serum amylase tests were performed at study entry and at 1, 3 and 6 months. The side-effects of drugs were recorded. Over the 6-month period, the median weight increase in group B (24%) was higher than in group A (2%). The median CD4-cell count increase from baseline in group B (94.5%) was better than in group A (9.4%). The reduction of VL below baseline in group B (1.2 log10; 20.8%) was also better than in group A (0.72 log10; 13.8%). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Both combination regimens could not completely suppress HIV RNA below detectable limits (<400 copies/ml). Both groups tolerated the regimens well; no side-effects or toxicities occurred. The efficacy levels of triple-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC+NFV) and double-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC) were not different. There were no side-effects and no deaths during the 6-month study period.     

The role of abacavir (ABC, 1592) in antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, trial. CNA3002 European Study Team

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiviral activity of abacavir (ABC) with stable background therapy (SBG) and SBG alone in antiretroviral therapy-experienced subjects as demonstrated by the proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA < or = 400 copies/ml, plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count profiles, and safety and tolerance of the two regimens over 16 weeks. DESIGN: One-hundred and eighty-five HIV-1 infected adults, with CD4 cell counts > or = 100 x 10(6)/l and plasma HIV-1 RNA of 400-50,000 copies/ml and who had received SBG therapy for at least 12 weeks, were randomized to receive ABC (300 mg twice daily) or placebo in a double blind, multi-centre study. METHODS: Antiretroviral activity was assessed by measuring changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance was determined at baseline and week 16. Evaluation of safety and tolerance was based on clinical adverse events and laboratory analyses. RESULTS: At week 16 significantly more subjects receiving ABC + SBG had plasma HIV-1 RNA < or = 400 copies/ml (36/92, 39%) than subjects receiving SBG alone (7/93, 8%; P < 0.001). A similar response was observed in both the lamivudine naive and lamivudine-experienced subjects. The presence of the M184V mutation did not preclude an antiviral response to ABC; 73% of subjects with the M184V mutation alone experienced a > or = 1.0 log10 copies/ml reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA or had a value of < or = 400 copies/ml by week 16. CONCLUSIONS: ABC was generally well tolerated and exerted significant antiviral effect when added to combination antiretroviral therapy over 16 weeks.     

Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 306 Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To study the antiviral activity of lamivudine (3TC) plus zidovudine (ZDV), didanosine (ddl), or stavudine (d4T). DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, partially double-blinded multicenter study. SETTING: Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Units. PATIENTS: Treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with 200-600x10(6) CD4 T lymphocytes/l. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were openly randomized to a d4T or a ddl limb, then randomized in a blinded manner to receive: d4T (80 mg/day), d4T plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos; or ddl (400 mg/day), ddl plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos. After 24 weeks 3TC was added for patients assigned to the monotherapy arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA level at weeks 24 and 48.RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. After 24 weeks the mean reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/ml from baseline was 0.49 log10 (d4T monotherapy) versus 1.03 log10 (d4T plus 3TC; P = 0.001), and 0.68 log10 (ddl monotherapy) versus 0.82 log10 (ddl plus 3TC; P>0.22). After 48 weeks the mean reduction was 1.08 log10 (d4T plus 3TC) versus 1.01 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC) in the d4T limb (P = 0.66), and 0.94 log10 (ddl plus 3TC) versus 0.88 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC; P = 0.70) in the ddl limb. CONCLUSIONS: 3TC added significantly to the virologic effects of d4T, but not ddl, in treatment-naive patients. 3TC plus d4T produced virologic changes comparable to those of 3TC plus ZDV. These results support the use of 3TC with either ZDV or d4 as a component of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.     

The risks and incidence of K65R and L74V mutations and subsequent virologic responses.

The L74V and K65R mutations confer resistance to several nucleoside analogues, and the impact on subsequent regimens is unclear. The risk of developing L74V or K65R mutation in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was 4.5 and 2.8 cases per 100 person-years, respectively; concomitant receipt of boosted protease inhibitors protected against K65R. High rates of virologic suppression in the presence of either mutation were observed if the next regimen contained at least 2 active agents. If suboptimal HAART was used, patients with K65R experienced significantly higher rates of virologic suppression than did those with L74V (P = .01).