Elevated levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors are associated with increased mortality rates in patients who undergo operation for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE: Elevated levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors (sTNF-Rs) are associated with multiple organ failure and increased mortality rates in critically ill patients. Paradoxically, experimental data suggest exogenous sTNF-Rs may improve outcome in patients who undergo elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. This study examines, for the first time, changes in sTNF-R levels during repair of ruptured and nonruptured AAA. METHODS: Sixteen patients who underwent surgical procedures for ruptured AAA and 10 patients who underwent surgical procedures for nonruptured AAA were studied. Levels of sTNF-Rs p55 and p75 were measured before the operation and immediately before and 5 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after aortic clamp release. RESULTS: When compared with nonruptured AAA, levels of sTNF-R p55 were significantly higher in ruptured AAA 5 minutes (P <.02) and 24 hours after aortic clamp release (P <.05). Levels of sTNF-R p75 were significantly higher in ruptured AAA before (P <.05), during (P <.001), and after the surgical procedure (P <.01). Six hours after aortic clamp release, sTNF-R p75 levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors of ruptured AAA when compared with survivors (P <.05) and patients who underwent surgical procedures for nonruptured AAA (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Ruptured AAA repair is associated with increased sTNF-R expression. Furthermore, elevated levels of sTNF-R p75 are associated with increased postoperative mortality rates.     

Endovascular vs open AAA repair: similar effects on renal proximal tubular function.

AIM: To compare the effect of open and endovascular repair on renal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, non-randomized study twenty-four abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treatable with either method were repaired, 15 using endovascular device (ENDO group) and nine with open surgery with infrarenal aortic cross-clamping (OPEN group). All the patients had standardised general anaesthesia, intravascular fluid therapy and monitoring. Renal function tests and cardiovascular measurements were performed at predetermined intervals. RESULTS: N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase indexed to urinary creatinine (U-NAG/crea), a sensitive marker of renal proximal tubular damage, increased similarly in both groups at the end of surgery (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). No patient developed clinical renal impairment, on the contrary, creatinine clearance was increased, serum cystatin C (a sensitive marker of renal glomerular filtration) and serum creatinine concentration decreased at 24 hours postoperatively (Wilcoxon paired test, p < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss and the amount of administered crystalloids were higher in the OPEN than in the ENDO group (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05). The cardiovascular measurements were comparable between the groups. The mean (SD) amount of radio-contrast media given was 3.1 (1.1) ml/kg in the ENDO group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that endovascular AAA repair does not protect renal proximal tubular function. A temporary renal tubular dysfunction was found both in open and in endovascular AAA repair which did not lead to permanent changes in renal function.     

Changes of the Infrarenal Aortic Segment After Conventional Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVES: to delineate the natural history of the residual infrarenal aortic segment after conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. DESIGN: open prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: between 1990 and 1997, 100 patients, who underwent conventional infrarenal AAA repair at our department, were followed annually by means of colour duplex ultrasonography. Data from 76 patients who had at least 3 scans were analysed. RESULTS: mean duration of follow-up was 4.7 years (range: 3-8 years). The residual infrarenal aorta dilated a mean of 0.57 mm annually. No patient required reoperation. There was no significant correlation between dilatation and any of the recorded risk factors except for the initial neck diameter (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: conventional AAA surgery is durable so that surveillance, during the first 5 postoperative years, is not justified in terms of cost-effectiveness. The impact of such a dilatation on endovascular AAA repair requires further investigation.     

肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后并发症的防治

目的　总结肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后常见并发症的预防与处理。　方法对已施行腔内治疗的 71例肾下腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析 ,讨论常见并发症发生的原因、处理、结果及预后。　结果　 71例接受腔内治疗的肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤患者技术成功率1 0 0 % ,无中转开腹手术者。原发性内漏 8例 ,神经并发症合并急性血栓形成 1例。一过性缺血性肠炎 2例。无肾动脉梗死、肢体栓塞等并发症。平均随访时间 (2 6± 5)个月。围手术期病死率 1 3 % (1 /71 ) ,总病死率 4 2 % (3/ 71 )。死亡原因 2例为急性心肌梗死 ,1例为急性心功能衰竭。随访过程中发现 3例原发性内漏转为持续性内漏 ,另发现继发性内漏 4例。本组患者 1个月后内漏发生率 9 8%(7/ 71 )。 2例继发性Ⅰ型内漏随访中瘤体增大 ,1例进行二期腔内治疗。　结论　动脉瘤的腔内治疗具有创伤小、技术操作可行、效果肯定的优点 ,内漏血是该技术主要并发症。对漏血量及瘤体有增大趋势的内漏应积极处理     

Natural history of the residual infrarenal aorta after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Purpose: We determined the natural history of the residual native infrarenal aortic segment after conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods: For the retrospective arteriographic case series, 800 hundred translumbar aortograms (TLAs) were obtained for 272 patients, before and after conventional AAA repair. The main outcome measures were changes in the aortographic diameter and the length of the infrarenal aortic segment, corrected and uncorrected for magnification by normalization to the first lumbar vertebral body height. Results: The mean follow-up time from the preoperative TLA to the most recent postoperative TLA was 42 months (range, 1 to 257 months). Vertebral body height did not change p = 0.35). The length of the native infrarenal aorta cephalad to the proximal anastomosis increased a mean of 3 mm, from 23 to 26 mm p = 0.001). However, in 115 patients (43%), this aortic segment elongated more than 5 mm, and in 63 patients (24%), it elongated more than 10 mm. The native residual infrarenal aorta above the proximal anastomosis dilated a mean of 1 mm, from 23 to 24 mm p = 0.001), but in 21 patients (8%), it dilated more than 5 mm. There was a weak positive correlation between the increase in residual native aortic diameter and duration of follow-up. There was a negative correlation between this increase and the initial size. The diameters of the proximal anastomosis and proximal graft did not change. Marked variability in the changes in aortic dimensions was observed. Conclusions: A mean period of 42 months after conventional AAA repair, the native infrarenal aortic segment elongates and dilates. Although such enlargement is statistically significant, the average increase appears to be small. However, residual aortic cuff diameter increased more than 5 mm and neck length more than 10 mm in a significant number of patients, with potentially serious implications for endovascular treatment of AAA. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:805-12.)     

Endovascular Treatment of Failed Prior Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Failure of endovascular or conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair may occur as a result of attachment site endoleak (type I) or paraanastomotic aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm formation. This study examined the results of the use of secondary endovascular grafts for the treatment of failed prior infrarenal AAA repair procedures. Forty-seven patients were treated with endovascular grafts. These included 14 patients with type I endoleaks (5 proximal, 8 distal, 1 proximal and distal) and 33 patients with paraanastomotic aneurysms after standard open surgical AAA repair (3 proximal aorta, 5 distal aorta, 21 iliac, 4 proximal and distal). The interval between the primary aortic procedure and the endovascular repair was significantly shorter for failed endovascular procedures (mean, 18.2 months; range, 1-42 months) than for failed conventional procedures (mean, 108.9 months; range, 12-216 months) (p <0.01). The endovascular devices used for correction of the failed AAA repairs were Talent (23), physician-made (19), AneuRx (2), Vanguard (2), and Excluder (1). Transrenal fixation was used for repair of all proximal anastomotic failures. Mean follow-up after reintervention was 12.2 months in patients with failed endovascular grafts and 10.6 months in patients with failed conventional grafts. Patient demographics were as follows: average age, 78 years; 36 male and 11 female; and 4.1 comorbid medical conditions per patient. The endovascular graft was successfully deployed in all 47 cases; 1 patient experienced a persistent proximal attachment site endoleak after endograft deployment. Endovascular grafts may be used to treat previously failed endovascular and conventional AAA repair procedures with good short- and intermediate-term results. Endovascular treatments in these cases may avoid the difficulties of aortic reoperation or AAA repair in the setting of prior endovascular aortic grafting.     

Response of plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 to conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or endovascular exclusion: implications for endoleak

PURPOSE: Matrix metalloproteinases are enzymes capable of breaking down all of the components of the extracellular matrix and have been implicated in the development of aneurysm formation. Because matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels are elevated in aortic aneurysmal tissue and in that patient plasma, we hypothesized that plasma MMP-9 levels should decrease significantly after conventional and endovascular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair but that plasma MMP-9 levels would remain elevated in patients with endoleaks. METHODS: A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure plasma levels of MMP-9 in patients with AAA who underwent conventional (n = 26; mean age, 71.5 years) and endovascular (n = 25; mean age, 76.4 years) AAA repair. Levels were drawn before surgery and at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. Eight patients for endovascular repair had endoleaks identified on postoperative computed axial tomographic scans. RESULTS: No correlation existed between preoperative plasma MMP-9 levels when compared with age, gender, or aneurysm diameter. No significant difference in preoperative plasma MMP-9 levels or AAA diameter was identified between patients with conventional repair compared with endovascular repair. Of the 51 patients, 33 had follow-up samples available for analysis. A significant increase in mean plasma MMP-9 levels was noted 1 month (149.5 +/- 40.1 ng/mL) after conventional AAA repair compared with preoperative levels (83.9 +/- 26.1 ng/mL; P <.05) and remained elevated 3 months after surgery (129.8 +/- 56.6 ng/mL). In those patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm exclusion without endoleak, a significant decrease in mean plasma MMP-9 levels was noted at 3 months (27.4 +/- 5.2 ng/mL) when compared with preoperative values (60.8 +/- 8.8 ng/mL; P <.01). In contrast, patients with endoleak after endovascular exclusion did not have a significant decrease in plasma MMP-9 levels at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Plasma MMP-9 levels remain elevated for as much as 3 months after conventional AAA repair, whereas successful endovascular exclusion of an AAA results in decreased plasma MMP-9 levels by 3 months. MMP-9 may have clinical value as an enzymatic marker for endoleak after endovascular AAA exclusion.     

Myocardial damage in high-risk patients undergoing elective endovascular or open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides an objective assessment of the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Therefore we compared cardiac outcome in patients at high-cardiac risk undergoing open or endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA using preoperative DSE results. METHODS: Consecutive patients with >or=3 cardiac risk factors (age >70 years, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) undergoing infrarenal AAA repair were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent cardiac stress testing using DSE. Postoperatively data on troponin release and ECG were collected on day 1, 3, 7, before discharge, and on day 30. The main outcome measures were perioperative myocardial damage and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: All 77 patients (39 endovascular, 38 open) had a history of cardiac disease. The number and type of cardiac risk factors were similar in both groups. Also DSE results were similar: 55 vs 56%, 24 vs 28%, and 21 vs 18% had no, limited, or extensive stress induced myocardial ischemia respectively. The incidence of perioperative myocardial damage (47% vs 13%, p=0.001) and the combination of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death (13% vs 0%, p=0.02) was significantly lower in patients receiving endovascular repair. CONCLUSION: In patients with similar high cardiac risk, endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms is associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative myocardial damage.     

Impact of endovascular repair on open aortic aneurysm surgical training.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an endovascular stent-graft program on vascular training in open aortic aneurysm surgery. METHODS: The institutional and vascular surgery fellow experience in aortic aneurysm repair during a 6-year period was reviewed. The 3-year period before introduction of endovascular repair was compared with the 3-year period after introduction of endovascular repair. All patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs were entered prospectively into a vascular registry and retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the changing patterns in aortic aneurysm treatment and surgical training. RESULTS: Between July 1994 and June 2000, a total of 588 patients with AAA or thoracoabdominal aneurysms were treated at Stanford University Medical Center. There were 296 (50%) open infrarenal AAA repairs, 87 (15%) suprarenal AAA repairs, 47 (8%) thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs, and 153 (26%) endovascular stent-grafts. The total number of aneurysms repaired per year by vascular fellows before the endovascular program was 71.3 +/- 4.9 (range, 68-77) and increased to 124.7 +/- 35.6 (range, 91-162) after introduction of endovascular repair (P <.05). This increase was primarily caused by the addition of endovascular stent-graft repairs by vascular fellows (51.0 +/- 29.0/year [range, 23-81]). There was no change in the number of open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repairs per year, 53.0 +/- 6.6 (range, 48-56) before endovascular repair versus 47.0 +/- 1.7 (range, 46-49) after (P = not significant). There was a significant increase in the number of suprarenal AAA repairs per year by vascular fellows, 10.0 +/- 1.0 (range, 9-11) before endovascular repair compared with 19.0 +/- 6.5 (range, 13-26) after (P <.05). There was no change in the number of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs per year between the two groups, 8.0 +/- 3.0 (range, 4-11) before endovascular repair compared with 7.6 +/- 2.3 (range, 5-9) after. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of an endovascular aneurysm stent-graft program significantly increased the total number of aneurysms treated. Although the number of open aneurysm repairs has remained the same, the complexity of the open aneurysm experience has increased significantly for vascular fellows in training.     

Surgical Repair of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and safety of Suprarenal Aortic Clamping

Background

Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) comprises 15–20% of all AAAs and often requires open surgical repair (OSR) due to anatomical limitations associated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), particularly in the case of hostile proximal necks. This study aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of suprarenal clamping during OSR of juxtarenal AAAs and compare the outcomes of this technique with those of infrarenal clamping for AAAs.

Methods

Between January 1 2014, and December 31 2016, 289 consecutive patients aged ≥40 years underwent primary repair for infrarenal AAAs, including 141 OSRs and 148 EVARs. Of the 141 patients, 20 were excluded and totally, 121 patients were included.

Results

All patients had fusiform-type AAAs and were divided into infrarenal (N = 98) or suprarenal (N=23) clamp groups. The mean follow-up period was 51.4 months (95% CI: 48.6–54.2). Mean survival time was 51.4 months (95% CI: 48.6–54.2). Thirty-day mortality was 0.8%, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P > .999). Renal complication in infrarenal clamp group was 4.1% and suprarenal clamp group was 4.3% (P > .999). Old age (HR: 1.084; 95% CI: 1.025–1.147; P=.005) and high ASA score (HR: 2.361; 95% CI: 1.225–4.553; P = .010) were substantially associated with in-hospital complications.

Conclusions

Although endovascular procedures for repairing juxtarenal AAAs, such as fenestrated EVAR, have been developed, surgical repair is the standard treatment for juxtarenal AAAs. Morbidity and mortality due to open surgery were not higher in the juxtarenal AAA group than in the infrarenal AAA group. Therefore, need for suprarenal clamp should not preclude OSR and also there is continued need for training in surgical exposure of juxtarenal AAA and OSR.

     

Evaluation of the effect of endovascular options on infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular devices designed to exclude flow to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1999. This action allowed widespread use of this technology for AAA exclusion. The purpose of this report is to examine trends for use of these modalities, rates of rupture of AAA, and to compare results of open AAA repair with endovascular repair. Results were collected for all hospitals, except for Veterans Administration hospitals, by a state-wide repository. Data for the years 1996 through 1998 and 2001 through 2002 were evaluated, and data from 1999 through 2000 were excluded because no separate codes were available to distinguish between open and endovascular repair. The information gathered is based on the All Patient Refined Diagnostic Related Group (APRDRG; 3M, St. Paul, MN). An average of 718 open, elective AAA was performed between 1996 and 1998. This dropped to 503 open repairs from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.005). During that same interval, 308 endovascular elective AAA repairs were performed, therefore the total rate of elective repair increased by 100. The average rate of ruptured AAA repairs from 1996 to 1998 was 121 per year, and this dropped to 89 from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.005). The mortality of open AAA repair during the 1996 to 1998 and 2001 to 2002 intervals was unchanged (4.7%). Mortality from endovascular AAA repair between 2001 and 2002 was 1.9 per cent (P = 0.003). Major morbidity was 14.5 per cent for open, elective AAA repair and 6.3 per cent for endovascular elective repair from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.001). These data suggest that the advent of endovascular AAA repair has contributed to a reduction in the rate of ruptured AAA repairs, an increase in total procedures performed, and a significant decrease in perioperative deaths and major complications when compared with open AAA repair.     

Changes in the Proximal Neck of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Early after Endovascular Treatment

Long-term success of endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) depends on secure attachment of the stent to the proximal and distal necks of the aneurysm. The purpose of this retrospective study was to detect changes in the proximal neck early after endovascular treatment of infrarenal AAA. Between November 1997 and December 1998, we performed endovascular treatment of infrarenal AAA in 43 patients. A bifurcated modular stent (AneuRx by Medtronic) was used in all patients. An oversized stent with a diameter 10% greater than the preoperative diameter of the proximal neck of the AAA was used in all cases. Follow-up examinations were carried out at 1, 6, and 12 months using plain roentgenography, color Doppler ultrasound, and CT scan with contrast injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test. Deterioration of the aortic neck is the result of a variety of mechanisms. The natural history of the infrarenal neck of AAA following endovascular repair (as well as conventional open repair) is progressive enlargement. Stenting could be an added risk factor for expansion. Strict follow-up is essential for early detection of this complication.     

Conformational changes associated with proximal seal zone failure in abdominal aortic endografts

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a popular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study examines conformational changes in the infrarenal aortas of patients in whom proximal seal zone failures (PSF) developed after EVAR. METHODS: All 189 patients with aortic endograft underwent routine post-EVAR computed tomographic scan surveillance. Patients identified with proximal type I endoleaks, type III endoleaks, or proximal component separation without demonstrable endoleak underwent three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomographic scans from which measurements of the migration, length, volume, and angulation of the infrarenal aorta were made. RESULTS: Five patients (3%) had PSF develop, four of whom had aortic extender cuffs. Although changes in the AAA volume and aortic neck angle were slight or variable, the mean AAA length increased 34 mm and the mean aortic body angulation increased 17 degrees (P =.03 and.01, respectively). Lengthening and migration caused proximal component separation in four patients, with concomitant migration in two patients. Two patients underwent endovascular repair, two patients needed explantation of the endograft, and one patient awaits endovascular repair. Proximal component separation and type III endoleak recurred in one patient and were repaired with a custom-fitted graft. CONCLUSION: PSF of aortic endografts is associated with proximal angulation and lengthening of the infrarenal aorta. These findings reinforce the importance of proper initial deployment to minimize the need for aortic extender cuffs, which pose a risk of late endoleak development.     

应用国产整体式分叉型支架腔内治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤

目的探讨应用国产整体式分叉型支架腔内治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤的效果。方法回顾性分析2009年9月—2011年6月采用国产整体式分叉型支架腔内隔绝术治疗27例肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料。结果 27例腹主动脉瘤腔内修复均获成功,术后随访2～20个月复查CTA,DSA证实:瘤体被完全隔绝,支架无移位、扭曲及内漏现象。结论应用国产整体式分叉型支架腔内治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤安全有效,与分体式支架相比,其简便、经济、并发症少。     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm neck remodeling after open aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Proximal endovascular aortic graft fixation and maintenance of hemostatic seal depends on the long-term stability of the aortic neck. Previous investigations of aortic neck dilation mostly focused on the infrarenal aortic diameter. Fenestrated and branched stent grafts facilitate suprarenal graft fixation and may thereby improve the long-term integrity of the aortic attachment site. For these devices, the natural history of the suprarenal aortic segment is also of interest. We investigated the natural history of the supra- and infrarenal aortic segment after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: For this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the preoperative and the initial postoperative as well as the most recent CT series that were obtained from 52 patients undergoing conventional repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 1998 and December 2002. Measurements were performed using electronic calipers on a "split screen", allowing direct comparison of subsequent CT series at corresponding levels along the vessel. Main outcome measures were changes in postoperative measures of the supra- and infrarenal aortic diameters. RESULTS: The first postoperative exam was at a mean (+/-SD) of 7.0 +/- 3.5 months, and the final exams were at 44.4 +/- 21 months. Over this time period, the estimated rate of change in suprarenal diameter was 0.18 mm/ y with 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.08 to 0.27. The estimated rate of change for the infrarenal diameter was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.27). A clinically relevant diameter increase of >or=3 mm was observed in seven patients (13%). There was evidence of larger diameter increases associated with larger AAA diameters (P = .003 and <.001 for suprarenal and infrarenal diameters), an inverted funnel shape (P = .002 and <.001), and marginal evidence of association with a history of inguinal hernia (P = .043 and .066). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is statistically significant evidence of increases in the supra- and infrarenal aortic diameters after conventional AAA repair, mean annual increases tended to be small and clinically relevant increases of 3 mm or more were observed in only a small proportion of cases.     

Myocardial Injury and Systemic Fibrinolysis in Patients Undergoing Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: a Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND: ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is associated with inhibition of systemic fibrinolysis. Hypofibrinolysis is a risk factor for ischaemic myocardial injury, one of the commonest complications of ruptured AAA repair. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is one of the most sensitive and specific marker of myocardial injury currently available. OBJECTIVE: To examine, for the first time, the relationship between fibrinolytic activity and myocardial injury in patients operated for ruptured AAA. METHODS: Twenty patients (18 men and 2 women of median age 74, range 65-86 years) undergoing repair of ruptured AAA were prospectively studied. Plasma tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) activity were measured pre-operatively, immediately before and five minutes following aortic clamp release. Serum cTnI was measured pre-operatively, 6 and 24 h following clamp release. Results cTnI was detectable at one or more sample points in 13 (65%) patients, and in 7 out of 8 patients who suffered major cardiac complications. There was a significant negative correlation between pre-operative t-PA activity and cTnI before operation (r =-0.55, p = 0.01) and 6 h ( r =-0.51, p =0.02) after clamp release. There was a significant positive correlation between pre-operative PAI activity and cTnI before operation (r =+0.50, p =0.03), 6 h ( r =+0.47, p =0.04) and 24 h ( r =+0.50, p =0.03) after clamp release. There was no correlation between pre- and intra-operative hypotension or blood transfusion requirement and cTnI release. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofibrinolysis during ruptured AAA repair is associated with the development of peri-operative myocardial injury. The causal mechanisms underlying this state are not clear but treatment of this prothrombotic/hypofibrinolytic diathesis may help to limit myocardial cell necrosis.     

Predictors of survival following open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Clinical decision making for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) weighs risk of aneurysm rupture, treatment hazards, and overall survival expectations. AAA diameter is the primary parameter in assessing rupture risk. Perioperative risk assessment has been extensively studied, and in-hospital mortality has been reduced to less than 8% with higher-risk open repair and less than 3% with endovascular repair. The purpose of this report is to determine risk factors that predict 2-year survival following open and endovascular AAA repair. We studied 334 patients enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial evaluating an endovascular graft in comparison to standard open repair of infrarenal AAA. Demographic, medical history, physical examination, laboratory, anatomic, procedural, and standardized risk score system variables were analyzed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was 89% at 2 years. Heart disease, cancer, and stroke were the most common causes of death, and no deaths were due to AAA rupture. Cox modeling demonstrated that there were several independent predictors for death after AAA repair: smaller body mass index (p=0.005), Society for Vascular Surgery pulmonary risk score >or=1 (p=0.005), history of erectile dysfunction (p=0.008), history of heart valve replacement (p=0.008), lower preoperative platelet count (p=0.012), larger ratio of AAA diameter/proximal neck diameter (p=0.020), and lower ankle-brachial index (p=0.031). Age, gender, and open or endovascular treatment group are not significant independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in this study. Clinical, laboratory, and anatomic factors predict survival after open and endovascular repair of AAAs. With progressive reduction of in-hospital mortality, assessment of patient longevity after AAA repair has become a more important factor in clinical decision making. Use of valid predictors of patient survival will optimize resource utilization and improve overall patient outcomes. Better selection of patients for any method of repair may improve overall utility more than choice of open or endovascular techniques.     

腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的疗效比较

目的 比较腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的近期疗效。方法 对34例肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行分析，比较腔内治疗组（15例）与传统开放手术治疗组（19例）的术前状况、手术相关情况、术后并发症、死亡率及手术前后的实验室检查数据。结果 腔内组术中出血量和输血量明显少于手术组（P=0．005、P=0．015），腔内组术后平均禁食时间和平均住院时间较手术组明显缩短（P〈0．0l、P：0．001）。手术组术后并发症发生率明显高于腔内组（P〈0．01）。术后第3天白细胞计数腔内组明显低于手术组（P=0．020）；术后第5天红细胞计数及血肌酐水平在腔内组均明显高于手术组（P=0．011、P=0．034）。结论 腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗具有安全、微创、对人体内环境干扰小的优点，近期疗效较传统开放手术好。     

Blood loss and transfusion in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion are known determinants of mortality and morbidity of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The present study analysed the pattern of blood loss and transfusion and evaluated the risk factors of blood loss during open repair of infrarenal AAA. METHODS: Blood loss, transfusion and fluid replacement during elective open repair operation for patients with infrarenal AAA were correlated to demographic data, operative findings and procedural information. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 71 years was analysed. The mean blood loss was 1000 +/- 887 mL (200-6000 mL). Blood transfusion, with a mean transfusion volume of 400 +/- 591 mL (0-3000 mL), was required in 46% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that bodyweight, renal impairment, low haemoglobin and platelet counts, iliac artery involvement, large aneurysm, bifurcated graft, large graft diameter, prolonged aortic clamp time and long operation time were associated with a higher blood loss. A haemoglobin level of <10.5 g/dL (relative risk (RR): 4.6), platelet count <130 x 10(9)/L (RR: 3.9), aortic clamp time >50 min (RR: 15), total operation time >200 min (RR: 11) and type of graft (RR: 3.5) were identified as independent determinants of blood loss on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative blood loss in elective infrarenal aneurysm surgery is influenced by patients' haematological parameters, distal involvement of aneurysm and degree of difficulty of operation.     

The impact of endovascular treatment on in-hospital mortality following non-ruptured AAA repair over a decade: a population based study of 16,446 patients.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesised that over the past decade, the nation-wide outcome of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has improved with the introduction of endovascular treatment. The aim of the study was to identify endovascularly-treated patients in a national registry and to assess the impact on in-hospital mortality of non-ruptured AAA repair, if any, after the introduction of endovascular repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the nation-wide outcome of non-ruptured AAA repair over the past decade. Variables studied were age and gender of the patients, hospital size and type and the year in which treatment was performed and the outcome on in-hospital mortality. The in-hospital mortality of non-ruptured AAA repair in 16,446 patients in the 10-year period from 1991 to 2000 was 7.3% (6.2-8.2%). In the 15,589 (95%) patients that underwent conventional treatment, in-hospital mortality was 7.6% (7.0-8.1%), whereas in the endovascular group it was 1.9% (0.6-3.5%). In the multivariate analysis, age and endovascular repair were the most important independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: With the limitations of a national registry aside, the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair seems to have had a small but significant impact on in-hospital mortality following infrarenal AAA repair.