Improved Prognosis of Cirrhosis Patients with Esophageal Varices and Thrombocytopenia Treated by Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Partial Splenic Embolization

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the combination of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and partial splenic embolization (PSE) compared with EVL alone in cirrhosis patients with thrombocytopenia. In a prospective study, 84 cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices and thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/mm(3)) underwent EVL plus PSE (N = 42) or EVL alone (N = 42). Primary end points assessed during the follow-up period included the recurrence of varices, progression to variceal bleeding, and death. Comparison between combined treatment and variceal ligation alone by multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.44 for the recurrence of varices (P = 0.02), 0.19 for progression to variceal bleeding (P = 0.01), and 0.31 for death (P = 0.04). These results suggest that the combination of EVL plus PSE can prevent the recurrence of varices, progression to variceal bleeding, and death in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices and thrombocytopenia.     

A new "sandwich" method of combined endoscopic variceal ligation and sclerotherapy versus ligation alone in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Variceal ligation is the optimum endoscopic method for treating esophageal variceal bleeding. However, both early and multiple recurrences of esophageal varices frequently follow ligation. The aim of this randomized study was to determine whether a new, combined endoscopic "sandwich" method (i.e., ligation-sclerotherapy-ligation) could achieve better results than ligation alone. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with cirrhosis and acute or recent esophageal variceal bleeding were randomized to undergo either the "sandwich" method or ligation alone (47 patients in each group). RESULTS: The sclerosant was retained in the varices for more than 30 minutes in 7 of 8 patients undergoing the "sandwich" method plus radiographic contrast medium. Active bleeding was controlled with this new method (9/9) as efficiently as ligation (12/12). The rate of recurrent bleeding was similar for both methods. Multivariate analysis showed the necessity for the use of antibiotics (odds ratio 3.95: 95% CI [1.60, 9.76]) to be an independent factor for recurrent bleeding. Two patients in the "sandwich" group developed strictures, but the frequency of other complications did not differ between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the cumulative probability of variceal recurrence was lower with the "sandwich" method (p = 0.0391). The survival rate and causes of death were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The "sandwich" method leads to longer retention of sclerosant in varices. This method is superior to ligation alone in terms of lower variceal recurrence rate and comparable to ligation with respect to hemostasis. However, it is unknown whether the lower recurrence rate of varices will persist long-term.     

Endoscopic variceal band ligation compared with propranolol for prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding

Administration of nonselective beta-blockers in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding is not suitable for all patients. Thus, we evaluated endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL) in primary prevention of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and large esophageal varices. A total of 73 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and large esophageal varices without a history of gastrointestinal bleeding were randomized to receive either EVBL or propranolol and were followed for up to 18 months. Forty patients underwent EVBL and 33 patients received propranolol. Variceal bleeding occurred in 2 patients in the EVBL (5%) and in 2 patients in the propranolol group (6%, NS). The 18 month actuarial risk for first variceal bleed was 5% in the EVBL (95% CI, 0-12%) and 20% in the propranolol group (95% CI, 0-49%, NS). The actuarial probability of death at 18 months of follow-up was 5% (95% CI, 0-11%) in the EVBL group and 7% (95% CI, 0-17%, NS) in the propranolol arm. In conclusion, EVBL was an effective and safe alternative to propranolol in primary prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with large esophageal varices.     

Endoscopic ligation vs. sclerotherapy in adults with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sclerotherapy is a well-established treatment for bleeding esophageal varices, although it has a substantial complication rate. A prospective randomized trial was conducted to determine whether endoscopic variceal ligation is safer and more effective than sclerotherapy in adults with bleeding esophageal varices because of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. METHODS: Thirty-six patients underwent sclerotherapy and 37 had band ligation. RESULTS: Ligation and sclerotherapy were equally effective for achieving variceal eradication (94.6% vs. 91.7%, respectively; p=0.67). However, ligation achieved eradication with fewer endoscopic sessions (3.7 [1.2] vs. 7.7 [3.3]; p <0.0001) and within a shorter time interval (50.1 [17.7] days vs. 99 [54.8] days; p <0.0001). In the ligation group, recurrent bleeding was less frequent (2.7% vs. 19.4%; p=0.028; however, Bonferroni correction for multiple testing removes this significance) and the rate of major complications was lower (2.7% vs. 22.2%; p=0.014). Total cost per patient was significantly higher in the sclerotherapy vs. the ligation group ($216.6 [71.8] vs. $182.6 [63.4]; p=0.035). During the follow-up period after variceal eradication, no significant differences were found between the sclerotherapy and the ligation groups with respect to recurrent bleeding (3% vs. 2.9%; p=1.0), esophageal variceal recurrence (9.1% vs. 11.4%; p=1.0), and formation of new gastric varices (9.1% vs. 14.3%; p=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Variceal band ligation is superior to sclerotherapy, because it is less costly and achieves variceal eradication more quickly, with lower relative frequencies of recurrent variceal bleeding and complications.     

Comparison of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy with sequential endoscopic band ligation plus low-dose sclerotherapy for secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and band ligation both have certain limitations such as, respectively, esophageal complications and early recurrence of varices. METHODS: From February 1994 to March 1996, all consecutive patients with portal hypertension due to either cirrhosis or noncirrhotic portal fibrosis and a history of variceal bleeding were included in a prospective study and randomly assigned to receive either endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy alone or endoscopic variceal band ligation plus low-dose endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. RESULTS: Of 69 patients, 34 were randomly assigned to receive endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy alone; 35 received endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. Complete variceal eradication rates (85% vs. 80%) and the number of endoscopic sessions required for eradication (6.61 +/- 2.94 vs. 7.85 +/- 3.31) were similar in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy groups, respectively. The mean volume of sclerosant required in the combined group (54.94 +/- 33.74 mL) was significantly less than that in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy group (81.91 +/- 34.80 mL). The complication and recurrent bleeding rates were significantly higher in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy group than those in the combined group (20% and 16% vs. 3% and 3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy were comparable in eradicating varices but the combined technique was associated with significantly lower complication and recurrent bleeding rates.     

Endoscopic variceal ligation versus propranolol in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with propranolol in prophylaxis on the rate of first esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted in 100 cirrhotic patients with no history of previous upper gastrointestinal bleeding and with esophageal varices endoscopically judged to be at high risk of hemorrhage. The end-points of the study were bleeding and death. RESULTS: Life-table curves showed that prophylactic EVL and propranolol were similarly effective for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (11/50 [22%]vs 12/50 [24%]; P = 0.68) and overall mortality (14/50 [28%]vs 12/50 [24%]; P = 0.49). The 2-year cumulative bleeding rate was 18% (9/50) in the EVL group and 16% (8/50) in the propranolol group. The 2-year cumulative mortality rate was 28% (14/50) in the EVL group and 24% (12/50) in the propranolol group. Comparison of Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to death of both groups showed no significant difference in mortality in both groups (P = 0.86). Patients undergoing EVL had few treatment failures and died mainly of hepatic failure. In the propranolol group, the mean daily dosage of the drug was 68.2 +/- 32.8 mg, which was sufficient to reduce the pulse rate by 25%. 20% of patients withdrew from propranolol treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis EVL is as effective and as safe as treatment with propranolol in decreasing the incidence of first variceal bleeding and death in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices.     

Control of isolated gastric varices by combination therapy using embolization and endoscopic scleroligation therapy

Balloon-occluded retrograde venous obliteration is a powerful new technique for eliminating gastric varices. However anatomic considerations may preclude its use in some instances. Two cases are reported in which combination embolization followed by endoscopic injection scleroligation therapy eradicated isolated gastric varices where balloon-occluded retrograde venous obliteration was impossible. Two men with alcoholic cirrhosis were admitted with bleeding gastric varices. Inability to access variceal venous drainage precluded balloon-occluded retrograde venous obliteration. In Case 1, transileocolic vein obliteration left gastric embolization, and partial splenic embolization only partially eradicated gastric varices. In Case 2, percutaneous transhepatic obliteration, left gastric embolization, and partial splenic embolization were only partially successful. In both cases, endoscopic injection scleroligation therapy was performed adjunctively. Endoscopic injection scleroligation therapy completely eradicated gastric varices in both patients following partially successful embolization therapy. These cases demonstrate the importance of individualizing treatment of esophageal varices, the value of combination therapy, and the effectiveness of endoscopic injection scleroligation therapy for treating varices.     

Idiopathic portal hypertension associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

A case of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is reported in a 38-year-old man who had been diagnosed with SLE and treated for 18 years. Esophageal varices, found in 1994 on endoscopic examination, had been followed up for 2 years. On July 16, 1996, he was admitted to Nagoya University Hospital because there was a high risk of bleeding from the esophageal varices due to severe thrombocytopenia. As partial splenic embolization had temporarily controlled the thrombocytopenia, splenectomy and devascularization of the stomach vessels were performed after endoscopic ligation of the esophageal varices. Histological specimens of wedge biopsied liver showed chronic inactive hepatitis without cirrhosis. The presence of anticardiolipin antibody, indicated by positivity for lupus anticoagulant, was suggestive of the presence of a common immunological mechanism in the etiology of SLE and IPH. Received: January 20, 1999 / Accepted: July 23, 1999     

Variceal hemorrhage

Opinion statement Reducing morbidity and mortality from esophageal varices remains a challenge for physicians managing patients with chronic liver disease. For patients who have never bled from varices, prophylactic therapy with nonselective beta-blockers reduces the risk of initial variceal bleeding and bleeding-related death. Thus, patients with newly diagnosed cirrhosis should be considered for endoscopic variceal screening. All patients with Child’s class B and C cirrhosis should be offered endoscopic screening, whereas those with Child’s class A with evidence of portal hypertension (eg, platelet count less than 140,000 per milliliter, portal vein diameter larger than 13 mm, evidence of splenic varices on ultrasound) should be screened. The principal risk factors for variceal bleeding are variceal size, the presence of color changes on the variceal wall (indicative of decreased wall thickness), and degree of liver dysfunction. Patients with moderate or large sized varices and those with varices exhibiting color changes (eg, red wale marks, cherry red spots) should be treated with beta-blockers. Individuals without varices and those with small varices should undergo repeat endoscopy at approximately 2-year intervals. Patients unwilling or unable to take beta-blockers do not need to be screened. For patients with acute variceal bleeding, the combination of pharmacologic therapy plus endoscopic therapy is superior to either therapy alone. Octreotide is the drug most often used as initial therapy in the United States. Terlipressin is the preferred agent; however, it is not available in the United States. Endoscopy is performed as early as possible, and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or endoscopic variceal band ligation is employed if variceal bleeding is confirmed or suspected. Endoscopic therapy should be repeated until the varices are obliterated completely. The addition of beta-blockers to endoscopic sclerotherapy or ligation may decrease the rate of rebleeding compared with receiving endoscopic treatment alone. Patients with bleeding refractory to combined medical plus endoscopic therapy should be considered for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts or shunt surgery.     

EUS in cirrhotic patients with and without prior variceal hemorrhage in comparison with noncirrhotic control subjects

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used to evaluate cirrhotic patients with and without prior variceal hemorrhage. The findings were compared with those of EUS in noncirrhotic control subjects to determine EUS features indicative of cirrhosis and of a risk for variceal hemorrhage. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing indicated endoscopic screening for varices or surveillance after endoscopic therapy for variceal hemorrhage were studied and compared with healthy noncirrhotic control patients undergoing EUS for benign conditions. RESULTS: Sixty-six cirrhotic patients (31 with prior hemorrhage) and 32 control patients were studied. Nonhemorrhage cirrhotic patients had more severe liver disease by Child's class (p = 0.02) and less beta-adrenergic blocker usage (p < 0.0001). Paraesophageal varices were detected in 97% of cirrhotic patients and 3% of control patients (p < 0.001) and were a more sensitive predictor of cirrhosis than varices at endoscopy (74%, p < 0.0001). Azygos vein and thoracic duct diameters, and gastric mucosa and submucosa thickness were greater for cirrhotic than control patients (p < 0.001). More hemorrhage patients had large (5 mm or greater) paraesophageal varices (odds ratio 3.1: 95% CI [1.1, 8.3]; p < 0.05) and paragastric varices (odds ratio 3.7: 95% CI [1.3, 10.2]; p = 0.01). Paraesophageal varix size correlated with ascites (p = 0.03) and, for nonhemorrhage patients, with Child's class (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Paraesophageal and paragastric varices correlate with the presence and severity of liver disease and portal hypertension. These data support the hypothesis that large paraesophageal and paragastric varices (5 mm or greater) may be risk factors for variceal hemorrhage, an observation that merits further prospective study. Cirrhosis causes dilation of the azygos vein and thoracic duct and thickening of gastric mucosa and submucosa.     

Argon plasma coagulation prevents variceal recurrence after band ligation of esophageal varices: preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic variceal ligation is an established procedure for eradication of esophageal varices. However, varices frequently recur after endoscopic variceal ligation. Argon plasma coagulation has been used as supplemental treatment for eradication of varices and for prevention of variceal recurrence in small uncontrolled series. The aim of this study was to determine whether argon plasma coagulation is effective in reducing variceal recurrence after endoscopic variceal ligation. METHODS: Thirty patients with cirrhosis, a history of acute esophageal variceal bleeding, and eradication of varices by endoscopic variceal ligation were randomized to argon plasma coagulation (16 patients) or observation (14 patients). The 2 groups were similar with respect to all background variables including age, Child-Pugh score, presence of gastric varices, and degree of portal hypertensive gastropathy. In the argon plasma coagulation group, the entire esophageal mucosa 4 to 5 cm proximal to the esophagogastric junction was thermocoagulated circumferentially with argon plasma coagulation in 1 to 3 sessions performed at weekly intervals. Endoscopy was performed every 3 months to check for recurrence of varices in both groups. RESULTS: During the course of the study, no serious complication was noted. After argon plasma coagulation, transient fever occurred in 13 patients and 8 complained of dysphagia or retrosternal pain/discomfort. Mean follow-up for all patients was 16 months (range 9-28 months). No recurrence of varices or variceal hemorrhage was observed in the argon plasma coagulation group, whereas varices recurred in 42.8% (6/14) of the patients in the control group (p < 0.04) and bleeding recurred in 7.2% (1/14). CONCLUSIONS: Argon plasma coagulation of the distal esophageal mucosa after eradication of esophageal varices by endoscopic variceal ligation is safe and effective for reducing the rate of variceal recurrence.     

Combined ligation and sclerotherapy versus ligation alone for secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Variceal ligation has been shown to be superior to sclerotherapy in prevention of rebleeding and improving survival in patients with cirrhosis. However, 25% of patients will rebleed before completion of treatment. A number of trials have compared the combination of ligation and sclerotherapy to ligation alone in achieving rapid and complete eradication of esophageal varices, with conflicting results. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified seven randomized, controlled trials that compared endoscopic variceal ligation with the combination of sclerotherapy and ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, reviewing references from retrieved articles, and scanning abstracts from conference proceedings. For each outcome, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. The Mantel-Haenszel test for statistical heterogeneity was used to assess the validity of combining results from individual studies. RESULTS: No significant difference was seen in cessation of actively bleeding varices (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.43-2.36), variceal rebleeding (OR = 1.12, CI = 0.69-1.81), and mortality (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.70-1.74) in patients with variceal ligation versus patients receiving the combination treatment of ligation and sclerotherapy. Treatment sessions required to achieve complete variceal eradication were similar in the two treatment arms. A significantly higher incidence of esophageal stricture was seen in combination therapy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ligation and sclerotherapy offers no advantage over ligation alone in prevention of rebleeding and in reduction of mortality. It is also associated with a higher complication rate of esophageal stricture.     

Endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with noncirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric variceal bleeding is the most important complication of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EPVT) and is usually treated endoscopically. Little is known about the prognosis of these patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term clinical outcome and efficacy of endoscopic treatment in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding secondary to EPVT. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTINGS: Single university center. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding, secondary to noncirrhotic, nonmalignant EPVT, who underwent endoscopic treatment between 1982 and 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic band ligation and/or endoscopic sclerotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The overall rebleeding risk, overall survival, complications of the endoscopic procedures, and predictive values of rebleeding. Analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate Cox regression. RESULTS: All patients were followed-up after the first endoscopically treated variceal bleeding. A total of 241 endoscopic procedures were performed. In all patients, initial control of bleeding was obtained. The overall rebleeding risk was 23% (95% CI, 0%-24%) at 1 year and 37% (95% CI, 43%-83%) at 5 years. Extension of thrombosis into the splenic vein and the presence of fundal varices were significant predictors of rebleeding, with a nearly 5-fold increased risk for patients with EPVT and fundal varices at the time of the first variceal hemorrhage (hazard ratio 5.07, P = .01). A portosystemic shunt procedure was performed in 5 patients: 4 for variceal bleeding and in one patient for refractory ascites. Seven patients died, none from variceal bleeding. Overall 5-year and 10-year survivals were 100% and 62% (95% CI, 38%-96%), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with variceal bleeding secondary to EPVT endoscopic treatment, in particular, band ligation appears safe and effective. EPVT-related mortality is primarily determined by other causes than variceal bleeding.     

经皮经肝胃冠状静脉栓塞术联合脾动脉栓塞术治疗肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张疗效观察

目的 观察经皮经肝胃冠状静脉栓塞术联合脾动脉栓塞术治疗肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张的疗效.方法 12例经胃镜明确为食管胃底重度静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者,择期行经皮经肝胃冠状静脉栓塞术及脾动脉栓塞术,术后定期胃镜检查,观察曲张静脉的动态变化.结果 术后即时食管胃底曲张静脉均消失;随访6～12个月曲张静脉基本消失6例,中度曲张3例,仍为重度曲张者3例,其中2例发生再出血,行胃镜下硬化剂治疗.结论 经皮经肝胃冠状静脉栓塞术联合脾动脉栓塞术是治疗肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张安全有效的方法.     

Therapeutic effects of endoscopic variceal ligation combined with partial splenic embolization for portal hypertension

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of a new strategy of endoscopic variceal ligation combined with partial splenic embolization (EVL-PSE) for patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS: From May 1999 to May 2002, 41 cases with cirrhosis and portal hypertension underwent EVL-PSE. Hemodynamics of the main portal vein (MPV), the left gastric vein (LGV) and azygos vein, including maximum velocity, flow rate and vein diameter, were assessed by Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: One case died from pulmonary artery embolism. One case complicated with splenic abscess was successfully managed by laparotomy. The esophageal varices and hypersplenism were well controlled after EVL-PSE in other patients. After EVL-PSE, the flow rate and velocity of MPV was significantly reduced (P<0.05), as well as the flow rate of the LGV and azygos vein. During the follow-up, no recurrent bleeding was found. CONCLUSION: Being more convenient and less invasive, EVL-PSE is hopeful to be a proper intervention strategy for portal hypertensive patients with impaired hepatic function or those intolerant to shunting or devascularization surgery.     

Endoscopic therapy for bleeding esophageal varices improves the outcome of Child C cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bleeding from esophageal varices is one of the frequent severe complications arising in patients with liver cirrhosis. The management of esophageal varices is therefore important for patient survival. The purpose of this study was to clarify the predictive factors for mortality in patients with Child C cirrhosis presenting with variceal bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 77 Child C cirrhotic patients with bleeding from esophageal varices was conducted. All patients received endoscopic therapy. Twenty-nine patients received endoscopic variceal ligation, and 48 patients received endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with ligation. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical data were performed to identify the prognostic factors for survival for these 77 patients. RESULTS: Fifty-seven of 77 patients received endoscopic therapy within 24 h after variceal bleeding, and bleeding was controlled in 55 (96.5%). The remaining 20 patients received endoscopic therapy more than 24 h after bleeding. Higher bilirubin level and rebleeding were the predictive parameters for 6-week survival in the 77 patients, according to univariate and multivariate analysis. Higher bilirubin level, refractory ascites, and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma were the predictive parameters for mortality in 77 patients as determined by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy was effective in controlling acute variceal bleeding of Child C cirrhotic patients. The prognosis of Child C stage patients presenting with variceal bleeding depended on the severity of liver damage and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Endoscopic variceal ligation of patients with liver cirrhosis and cirrhosis accompanied by hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: Rupture of esophageal varices with severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage is one of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicating LC. The present study looks at the success of hemostasis in LC and LC accompanied by HCC, the success of breaking the varices cluster and the rate of rebleeding in patients of LC subject to emergency ligation and prophylactic ligation. Methods: Seventy‐five patients were divided into three groups. Group 1: 30 patients with LC accompanied by HCC with digestive bleeding; group 2: 30 patients with LC with digestive bleeding; and group 3: 15 patients with LC with high risk of digestive bleeding from esophageal varices (with no medical history of digestive bleeding). Success of hemostasis 72 h after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was that patients did not vomit blood nor produce black feces. The effectiveness of EVL for iradication of the variceal cluster was classified into three levels: good, fairly good and poor. Results: The hemostasis success in group 1 (LC accompanied by HCC) and group 2 (LC with digestive bleeding due to esophageal varices) was 73.3% and 93.4%, respectively. The success of breaking the varix cluster in group 2 (LC) and group 3 (LC with high risk of digestive bleeding and treated by prophylactic ligation) was 73.3% and 80%, respectively. The rate of rebleeding in group 2 and group 3 after 1 year was 20% and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Endoscopic variceal ligation is a good technique for variceal hemostasis and eradication of the esophageal varices cluster.     

Long-term follow-up of patients with liver cirrhosis after endoscopic esophageal varices ligation therapy: comparison with ethanol injection therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Esophageal variceal hemorrhage is the most dreaded complication of liver disease. Prevention or emergency therapy of bleeding is important. METHODOLOGY: A group of 217 patients underwent endoscopic esophageal variceal therapy including endoscopic ethanol injection, endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation, or a combination of the two. RESULTS: Esophageal varices were eradicated by endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation with the least sessions required, and associated complications with endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation therapy were lower than with the other two approaches. However, the cumulative recurrence-free period of esophageal varices was significantly higher after endoscopic ethanol injection than after endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation and in some cases F3 varices were observed post-endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation hemorrhage. A combined endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation and endoscopic ethanol injection therapy had no advantage with respect to cumulative recurrence-free rate, session number, or complication frequency, relative to either therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: While the combined observations indicate that endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation is safe and simple, we should consider additional therapy to achieve complete mucosal fibrosis of the esophagus after endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation.     

Efficacy of absolute alcohol injection compared with band ligation in the eradication of esophageal varices

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sclerotherapy is an absolute indication for treating esophageal varices. Re-bleeding is common during the treatment period, before all varices become eradicated. AIM: To compare two techniques of endoscopic esophageal varices eradication: sclerotherapy with absolute alcohol and banding ligation. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Forty-six patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal varices were prospectively randomized into two treatment groups: endoscopic sclerotherapy with absolute alcohol and banding ligation. Patients were included if they had large varices with signs of high bleeding risk. Informed writing consent was obtained from every patient and the Ethics Committee of Federal University of S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil, approved the study. After eradication, all patients were followed up to 1 year to look for re-bleeding episodes and variceal recurrence. RESULTS: Both groups were similar except that male gender was more common in the sclerotherapy group. There was no statistical difference regarding variceal eradication (78.3% in sclerotherapy group vs 73.9% in the ligation group), recurrence (26.7% vs 42.9%, respectively) and death related to any cause (21.7% vs 13.9%). In the sclerotherapy group more sessions were need to obtain complete variceal eradication. In this group we did observe a high re-bleeding rate (34.8%) and more ulcers associated with retrosternal pain right after the procedure. There was no difference regarding overall morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Banding ligation requires fewer sessions than sclerotherapy with absolute alcohol to eradicate esophageal varices. Both methods are equally efficient regarding variceal eradication and recurrence during a short follow-up period.     

Clinical significance and prediction factors of gastric varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma is part of the natural history of liver cirrhosis. Gastrointestinal bleeding and hepatic failure are the leading causes of death in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. With gastrointestinal bleeding, variceal bleeding is the most prominent, and most variceal bleeding is of esophageal origin. Gastric varices bleeding is often a massive and severe bleeding episode. The role of gastric varices among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma remains to be clarified. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical significance and prediction of gastric varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: From 1998 to 2000, we reviewed 304 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations. Patients' clinical characteristics, physical findings, laboratory data, image studies, endoscopic examinations and treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: Among 304 patients with HCC, twenty-one (6.9%) had gastric varices among 304 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The location of gastric varices were the posterior wall in 12 (57%), the lesser curvature in 1 (5%), the greater curvature in 4 (19%) and the fundus in 4 (19%). Three (14%) of these 21 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric varices had clinical evidence of bleeding. One of them died due to uncontrollable bleeding. Child-Pugh classification, hepatic encephalopathy, portal vein or splenic vein dilatation, ascites, splenomegaly, albumin level, prothrombin time and platelet count were significantly different between hepatocellular carcinoma patients with gastric varices and without gastric varices under the univariate analysis. Ascites (Odds ratio: 5.45; 95% confidence interval: 2.12-14.01) and portal vein or splenic vein dilatation (Odds ratio: 4.38; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-10.86) were the two most important predictors under the stepwise logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of gastric varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is 6.9% and the risk of bleeding is low in this study. The Predictors of gastric varices among hepatocellular carcinoma are related to liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh classification, hepatic encephalopathy, portal vein or splenic vein dilatation, ascites, splenomegaly, albumin level, prothrombin time and platelet count.