The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.     

Effects of long-term antiepileptic drug monotherapy on vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis

Purpose: Long‐term therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been associated with metabolic consequences that lead to an increase in risk of atherosclerosis in patients with epilepsy. We compared the long‐term effects of monotherapy using different categories of AEDs on markers of vascular risk and the atherosclerotic process. Methods: One hundred sixty adult patients who were receiving AED monotherapy, including two enzyme‐inducers (carbamazepine, CBZ; and phenytoin, PHT), an enzyme‐inhibitor (valproic acid, VPA), and a noninducer (lamotrigine, LTG) for more than 2 years, and 60 controls were enrolled in this study. All study participants received measurement of common carotid artery (CCA) intima media thickness (IMT) by B‐mode ultrasonography to assess the extent of atherosclerosis. Other measurements included body mass index, and serum lipid profile or levels of total homocysteine (tHcy), folate, uric acid, fasting blood sugar, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), or thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Key Findings: Long‐term monotherapy with older‐generation AEDs, including CBZ, PHT, and VPA, caused significantly increased CCA IMT in patients with epilepsy. After adjustment for the confounding effects of age and gender, the CCA IMT was found to be positively correlated with the duration of AED therapy. Patients with epilepsy who were taking enzyme‐inducing AED monotherapy (CBZ, PHT) manifested disturbances of cholesterol, tHcy or folate metabolism, and elevation of the inflammation marker, hs‐CRP. On the other hand, patients on enzyme‐inhibiting AED monotherapy (VPA) exhibited an increase in the levels of uric acid and tHcy, and elevation of the oxidative marker, TBARS. However, no significant alterations in the markers of vascular risk or CCA IMT were observed in patients who received long‐term LTG monotherapy. Significance: Patients with epilepsy who were receiving long‐term monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, or VPA exhibited altered circulatory markers of vascular risk that may contribute to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, which is significantly associated the duration of AED monotherapy. This information offers a guide for the choice of drug in patients with epilepsy who require long‐term AED therapy, particularly in aged and high‐risk individuals.     

Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

Effect of topiramate on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in two models of experimental epilepsy

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED), topiramate (TPM), with conventional AEDs against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in mice. METHODS: Experiments were performed on mice and fully kindled rats. In pentylenetetrazol test, the chemoconvulsant was used at its CD97 dose of 105 mg/kg, producing clonic seizures in 97% of mice. Adverse effects were evaluated with the chimney test and passive avoidance task. Plasma levels of AEDs were measured with immunofluorescence. RESULTS: TPM at 20 mg/kg exerted a significant anticonvulsant effect as regards seizure and afterdischarge durations in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats, being ineffective at lower doses. Coadministration of TPM (10 mg/kg) with valproate (VPA; at a subtherapeutic dose of 50 mg/kg) resulted in essential reductions of seizure and afterdischarge durations. TPM (10 mg/kg) combined with carbamazepine (CBZ; at a subtherapeutic dose of 15 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, simultaneously decreasing the remaining seizure parameters (duration or severity of seizures and afterdischarge duration). TPM (10 mg/kg) given with phenobarbital (PB; 15 mg/kg) markedly shortened seizure severity and seizure and afterdischarge durations. Combinations of TPM with diphenylhydantoin (PHT) were ineffective against kindled seizures in rats. TPM combined with VPA and PB did not alter their plasma levels, but its combination with CBZ resulted in an increased free plasma CBZ concentration. TPM (10 and 20 mg/kg) alone and its combinations with conventional AEDs affected neither motor coordination nor long-term memory, evaluated in the chimney and passive avoidance tests, respectively, in rats. In pentylenetetrazol-evoked convulsions in mice, TPM (175 and 200 mg/kg) showed anticonvulsant effects per se. Moreover, TPM (at its subtherapeutic dose of 150 mg/kg), significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant action of ethosuximide (ESM), but not that of VPA, PB, or clonazepam (CZP) against pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures. Either TPM alone (150 mg/kg) or its combination with ESM did not result in significant undesired effects. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental data indicate that except for PHT, the combinations of TPM with conventional AEDs are beneficial against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. In the pentylenetetrazol test, this novel AED potentiated only the protection offered by ESM.     

Topiramate and phenytoin pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy to epileptic patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and phenytoin (PHT) in patients with epilepsy by studying their pharmacokinetics (PK) after monotherapy and concomitant TPM/PHT treatment. METHODS: Twelve patients with epilepsy stabilized on PHT monotherapy were enrolled in this study, with 10 and seven patients completing the phases with 400 and 800 mg TPM daily doses, respectively. TPM was added at escalating doses, and after stabilization at the highest tolerated TPM dose, PHT doses were tapered. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis during the monotherapy phase or the lowest PHT dose after taper and the concomitant TPM/PHT phase. Potential metabolic interaction between PHT and TPM also was studied in vitro in human liver microsomal preparations. RESULTS: In nine of the 12 patients, PHT plasma concentrations remained stable, with a mean (+/-SD) area under the curve (AUC) ratio (combination therapy/monotherapy) of 1.13 +/- 0.17 (range, 0.89-1.23). Three patients had AUC ratios of 1.25, 1.39, and 1.55, respectively, and with the addition of TPM (800, 400, and 400 mg daily, respectively), their peak PHT plasma concentrations increased from 15 to 21 mg/L, 28 to 36 mg/L, and 27 to 41 mg/L, respectively. Human liver microsomal studies with S-mephenytoin showed that TPM partially inhibited CYP2C19 at very high concentrations of 300 microM (11% inhibition) and 900 microM (29% inhibition). Such high plasma concentrations would correspond to doses in humans that are 5 to 15 times higher than the recommended dose (200-400 mg). TPM clearance was approximately twofold higher during concomitant TPM/PHT therapy CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the addition of TPM to PHT generally does not cause clinically significant PK interaction. PHT induces the metabolism of TPM, causing increased TPM clearance, which may require TPM dose adjustments when PHT therapy is added or is discontinued. TPM may affect PHT concentrations in a few patients because of inhibition by TPM of the CYP2C19-mediated minor metabolic pathway of PHT.     

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on neonatal outcomes

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Effects of Discontinuation of Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate on Concomitant Antiepileptic Medication

We report a prospective, controlled study of the effects of the reduction and discontinuation of phenytoin (PHT) (22 patients), carbamazepine (CBZ) (23 patients), and valproate (VPA) (25 patients) with concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The principal changes in the serum concentrations of concomitant AEDs were (a) phenobarbital (PB) concentrations decreased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT; (b) total CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 48% and free CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT, with no change in CBZ-10, 11-epoxide (CBZ-E) concentrations; (c) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 19% on discontinuation of PHT; (d) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 42% on discontinuation of CBZ; (e) ethosuximide (ESM) concentrations increased by a mean of 48% on discontinuation of CBZ; (f) PHT concentrations decreased by a mean of 26% on discontinuation of CBZ; (g) PHT free fraction decreased from a mean of 0.11 to 0.07 on discontinuation of VPA; and (h) the mean concentrations of total and free CBZ increased by a mean of 10 and 16%, respectively, on VPA discontinuation, with a concomitant mean 24% decrease in total CBZ-E and a 22% decrease in free CBZ-E. Apart from the decrease in PB concentrations on PHT discontinuation, all significant changes had occurred by 1 week after the end of AED discontinuation. The implication for clinical practice is that a serum AED concentration at this time reflects the new steady state. Free concentrations did not add any clinically useful information to that gained from analysis of total serum concentrations.     

Value of therapeutic drug level monitoring and unbound (free) levels.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has declined with newer anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) having no therapeutic window. Use of unbound (free) fraction has almost completely disappeared. The case reported highlights its importance and offers sound reason for its retention. A 66-year-old Caucasian man with known epilepsy was admitted with vomiting, ataxia and nystagmus presumably due to AED toxicity. Medications included valproate (VPA) 1g bd; phenytoin (PHT) 200mg tds; carbamazepine (CBZ) 400mg mane, 200mg midi, 400mg nocte; levetiracetam (LEV) 250mg bd. Initial AED-TDM revealed total serum levels of CBZ: 27mumol/L; PHT: 37mumol/L; VPA 499mumol/L, therapeutic or subtherapeutic. Free levels were subsequently measured demonstrating CBZ: 8.2mumol/L; PHT: 5mumol/L; VPA 93mumol/L. Consequently, VPA was initially omitted and dosage reduced with cessation of toxicity. AED regimen was greatly simplified and remained efficacious. This case highlights the value of TDM with polypharmacy and suggested AED toxicity. Total AED levels failed to identify the cause, which the unbound, free fraction identified. While total PHT was borderline subtherapeutic (37mumol/L; range: 40-80) the free level was therapeutic (5mumol/L; range: 4-8) and while VPA was therapeutic (VPA 499mumol/L; range: 300-750) the free level was supratherapeutic (93mumol/L; range: 30-75). Acknowledgement of discordance between total and free levels for highly protein-bound AED is highlighted.     

Protein binding of four antiepileptic drugs in maternal and umbilical cord serum.

The total and protein free levels of 4 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in serum from 35 maternity patients who had been treated with AED monotherapy throughout pregnancy were studied. Results were compared with those in the umbilical cord serum at the time of delivery, and the placental transfer of AEDs was evaluated from the viewpoint of the protein binding capacity of the drug. The materials consisted of 35 samples of maternal and umbilical cord serum in total and included 13 patients on phenobarbital (PB), 7 on phenytoin (PHT), 7 on carbamazepine (CBZ) and 8 on valproic acid (VPA). The mean fetal/maternal total concentration ratios were 0.86, 0.91, 0.73 and 1.59 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being above 1. On the other hand, the mean fetal/maternal free fraction ratios were 1.13, 1.10, 1.42 and 0.50 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being less than 1. Correlation of the 2 ratios showed a reciprocal proportion with a correlation coefficient of -0.90 (P < 0.005). It was considered that the fetal/maternal total concentration ratio of 4 AEDs was regulated by the fetal/maternal free fraction ratio of the corresponding AEDs and that the difference in fetal/maternal free fraction ratio depended on the type of drug being administered.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Pregnancy and the Risk of Teratogenicity

Summary: One in every 250 newborns is exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in utero. Various studies have attributed a teratogenic effect to these AEDs, mainly consisting of major malformations, minor anomalies, intrauterine or postnatal growth failure, and psychomotor retardation. Prospective studies confirm the increased risk of major malformations. The absolute risk of 7–10% is about 3–5% higher than that in the general population. Barbiturates and phe-nytoin (PHT) are particularly associated with congenital heart malformations, facial clefts, and some other malformations. Valproate (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are associated predominantly with spina bifida aperta (1–2 and 0.5–1.0% risk, respectively) and hypospadias. Bilateral radial aplasia is a rare but specific effect of VPA. Several studies identified additional risk factors, i.e., high daily AED dosage, high maternal serum AED concentrations, low folate levels, or po-lytherapy [phenobarbital (PB) plus primidone (PRM) plus PHT or CBZ plus VPA plus PB with or without PHT]. The few prospective studies controlled for socioeconomic factors or that considered parental findings indicate that risk of specific cognitive defects rather than risk of overall mental retardation may be increased, that early growth retardation is followed by a catch-up growth to normal, and that ocular hypertelorism and nail hypoplasia are the only minor anomalies causally related to PHT exposure. However, no final conclusions can be made. Genetic predisposition to the teratogenic side effects of AEDs plays a role, codetermining the recurrence risk if the woman has previously given birth to a child with a major malformation. The molecular genetic basis of this predisposition is unclear. No tests are yet available for identifying parents or fetuses at particularly high risk. Prevention of teratogenic AED side effects is possible by critical evaluation, before pregnancy, of the woman's need for AED therapy. If AED therapy cannot be avoided, it should be monotherapy with the lowest possible dosage. High peak levels should be avoided by dividing the daily dosage into at least two or three doses. The efficacy of folate supplementation alone in reducing teratogenic risks is unclear. In cases of obvious folate deficiency, treatment is required, but concomitant vitamin B₁₂ deficiency should first be excluded or treated. Prenatal diagnosis should be offered. It may consist of fetal ultrasound examination during Week 18–20, and of afetoprotein analysis of amniotic fluid obtained during Week 16 if the mother is receiving VPA or CBZ. This should be discussed with the parents before the pregnancy. The choice of medication is made not only by balancing the therapeutic advantages and teratogenic risks of each AED or AED combination but also by considering the parental attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy.     

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including antiepileptic drug (AED) teratogenicity and adverse perinatal outcomes. It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly compared to phenytoin (PHT) or lamotrigine (LTG). It is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. AED polytherapy probably contributes to the development of MCMs and reduced cognitive outcomes compared to monotherapy. Intrauterine exposure to VPA monotherapy probably reduces cognitive outcomes and monotherapy exposure to PHT or phenobarbital (PB) possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of MCMs. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered and avoidance of PHT and PB throughout pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes.     

Clinical Side Effects of Phenobarbital, Primidone, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate During Monotherapy in Children

The rate of onset of side effects was examined in 392 pediatric outpatients who received long-term monotherapy with phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy or febrile convulsions. The severity of side effects (based on need to alter treatment), the nature of each drug's most common side effects, and the doses and plasma levels of occurrence were recorded. Our results show that usually accepted therapeutic ranges are well tolerated. Indeed, although some form of side effect occurred in 50% of patients, treatment had to be changed in only 18% and the drug had to be stopped in only 7%. In decreasing order, the rates for side effects were PHT (71%) greater than PB (64%) greater than CBZ (43%) greater than VPA (43%) greater than PRM (29%). Serious side effects requiring withdrawal of treatment occurred at the following rates: PHT (10%) greater than VPA (8%) greater than PRM (8%) greater than PB (4%) greater than CBZ (3%). Among our patients, the best tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) was CBZ, and the least tolerated was PHT. Behavioral disorders were most common with PB, neurologic disorders with PHT, digestive tract disorders with VPA, and gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism with PHT. Behavioral disorders involving excitement seen with PB and PRM occurred most commonly at low plasma levels. Behavioral disorders involving depression seen with PB and VPA, those involving excitement seen with PHT and VPA, and digestive disorders seen with VPA occurred particularly when plasma levels were high.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lamotrigine and Other Antiepileptic Drugs in Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine LTG and to assess possible interactions with other AEDs in an unselected population of children. Concentration data in plasma and in CSF for lamotrigine as well as for the other AEDs are presented.
Methods : Thirty-one children, children and young adults aged > 2 years with intractable generalized epilepsy despite adequate duration and dose of at least three conventional AEDs were studied.
Results : There was a linear relation between the dose administered and the maximal plasma concentration, indicating that saturation of absorption or elimination mechanisms did not occur in the dose range studied. The median elimination half-life (t1/2) in patients receiving concomitant valproate (VPA) was 43.3 h; in patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or phenobarbital (PB), it was 14.1 h; and in patients receiving both VPA and CBZI PB or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it was 28.9 h. No clinically important changes in the plasma levels of CBZ, VPA, valproate, ethosuximide, or PB were observed in the follow-up period (2–12 months). No dose adjustments of concomitant AEDs were necessary. The plasma concentration of clonazepam (CZP) was reduced when LTG was introduced.
Conclusions : The complex interaction between LTG and other AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) desirable.     

Discontinuation of Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate in Patients with Active Epilepsy

The effects of discontinuing individual antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with active epilepsy who are receiving combination therapy have not been studied systematically. We report a double-blind, prospective study of discontinuation of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) in 70 patients with chronic active epilepsy. Each drug discontinuation was randomized to one of two relatively fast rates of reduction, and a control group of 25 patients continued with stable therapy. Patients who had CBZ removed had a significant increase in seizures that was maintained for 4 weeks after the end of drug reduction, and 10 of these 23 patients had to restart therapy with CBZ. There was no significant change in seizure numbers in the other groups. Two patients discontinued from VPA had to restart the drug; none had to restart PHT. The optimal rates of reduction of CBZ remain uncertain. There was no evidence for a clinically or temporally distinct burst of "discontinuation seizures" in any group. Any marked increase in seizures always resolved on reintroduction of the discontinued drug.