诱导性同步放化疗治疗侵袭性肺上沟瘤

目的：分析同步放化疗(CRT)在NSCLC外科治疗的地位。方法：回顾性总结1087～1996年外科手术的30例累及胸顶部的NSCLC，单纯手术组10例．手术+放疗组(RT)9例．含铂方案化疗+放疗组(CRT）11例。结果：单纯手术组2、4年生存率分别为30％和20%，RT组为22％和11％，CRT组为73％和53％。单因素分析根治性(是与否比较．P=0．027)和诱导性治疗(单纯手术和RT与CRT比较，P=0．0173)是有意义的预后因素。多因素分析仅诱导性治疗．P=0.0238．是有意义的预后因素。结论：与诱导性放疗和单纯手术相比,CRT可提高累及胸顶部的NSCLC患者的生存率。     

Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胸段食管鳞癌术后不同辅助治疗方式的疗效分析

目的 评价术后联合放化疗(S+CRT)或术后放疗(S+RT)对Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胸段食管鳞癌患者疗效和不良反应。方法 收集2007—2010年间行根治术且术后辅助放疗或放化疗的Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胸段食管鳞癌215例患者资料。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并Logrank法检验和单因素预后分析,Cox模型多因素预后分析。结果 S+CRT与S+RT组资料具有可比性(P=0.055~0.988)。随访满1、3、5年者分别为203、133、108例。全组患者1、3、5年OS和DFS分别为94.0%、61.4%、49.3%和74.9%、53.5%、46.7%。患者术前CT显示纵隔淋巴结肿大、术中食管病变与周边组织器官粘连程度、病理N分期、脉管瘤栓、阳性淋巴结个数和治疗方式均为OS影响因素(P=0.000~0.034),患者术前CT显示纵隔淋巴结肿大、术中食管病变与周边组织器官粘连程度、术后残端是否阳性、阳性淋巴结个数和治疗方式均为DFS影响因素(P=0.000~0.049)。S+CRT组OS、DFS均优于S+RT组(P=0.002、0.002)。分层分析显示Ⅱ期患者S+CRT组OS、DFS均高于S+RT组(P=0.041、0.001);N₁期患者S+CRT组OS、DFS也均高于S+RT组(P=0.021、0.024)。S+CRT组≥2级放射性胃炎及骨髓抑制发生率均高于S+RT组(P=0.000、0.015)。结论 Ⅱ、Ⅲ期胸段食管鳞癌术后患者接受S+CRT及S+RT均具有较好疗效;S+CRT较S+RT能提高Ⅱ期和N₁期患者OS与DFS;S+CRT组不良反应较大但患者均可耐受;但最终结论需前瞻性Ⅲ期随机研究证实。     

121例局限期食管小细胞癌治疗模式探讨

目的 探讨原发性局限期食管小细胞癌综合治疗模式及预后。方法 回顾分析2004—2012年间收治的局限期食管小细胞癌患者121例资料,其中手术组患者98例(单纯手术37例、手术+化疗40例、手术+放化疗21例),非手术组患者23例(放化疗18例、单纯化疗5例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法OS分析并Logrank检验和Cox模型多因素预后分析。结果 手术组1、3年OS率分别为88%、37%,非手术组分别为78%、43%(P=0.585)。手术组内不同治疗模式LC率相近(P=0.113),手术+化疗、手术+放化疗组OS率均优于单纯手术组(P=0.002、0.028)。手术+化疗组1、3年OS率分别为88%、44%,与放化疗组的83%、50%相近(P=0.969)。化疗≥4周期组1、3年OS率分别为89%、53%,高于<4周期组的85%、35%(P=0.036)。多因素分析显示只有化疗与否是影响因素(P=0.006)。结论 局限期食管小细胞癌单纯手术治疗预后差。在系统性化疗基础上的手术治疗比放疗并不能明显提高患者LC和预后。化疗是独立影响因素,推荐化疗周期数至少≥4周期。     

TNM因素对非小细胞肺癌治疗效果的影响

目的 探讨肺部原发肿瘤的大小、淋巴结不同区域的转移及有无远处转移对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)综合治疗效果的影响.方法 回顾性分析手术治疗的987例NSCLC患者的临床资料,将其中以手术+化、放疗的574例患者与单纯手术治疗的413例患者进行对比分析.结果 全组患者的1、3、5、10年生存率分别为87.7%、57.5%、54.6%和54.5%.其中综合治疗组的1年生存率高于单纯手术组(P<0.01).在T4患者中,手术+放疗组的5年生存率高于单纯手术组(P<0.05).在N0患者中,手术+化疗组、手术+放疗组与单纯手术组比较,1年生存率差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);在N1患者中,手术+化疗组、手术+放化疗组与单纯手术组比较,1年生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);在N2患者中,手术+化疗组与单纯手术组比较,1年和3年生存率差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 对于NSCLC患者,以手术为主的综合治疗疗效优于单纯手术.对T4患者应加强术后局部放疗,对NO和N1患者应辅以适度化、放疗,对N2患者则应强调辅以足够的化疗.     

Ⅰa期和Ⅰb期非小细胞肺癌综合治疗的远期效果

目的探讨综合治疗对Ⅰ(Ⅰa+Ⅰb)期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)长期生存的影响。方法手术切除Ⅰa期和Ⅰb期NSCLC 983例,比较综合治疗与单纯手术的治疗效果。结果全组5年生存率:Ⅰa期综合治疗组和单纯手术组分别为80.2%和79.3%;Ⅰb期分别为61.6%和64.5%。不同病理类型5年生存率:鳞癌:Ⅰa期单纯手术79.0%,手术+化疗84.2%,手术+放疗57.1%;Ⅰb期单纯手术67.0%,手术+化疗+放疗65.6%,手术+化疗65.2%,手术+放疗47.9%。腺癌:Ⅰa期单纯手术80.0%,手术+化疗85.7%;Ⅰb期单纯手术65.2%,手术+化疗+放疗16.7%,手术+化疗72.4%。腺鳞癌:Ⅰb期单纯手术39.0%;Ⅰb期手术+化疗59.6%。但上述各组5年生存率之间均未见统计学差异。结论手术+化疗治疗Ⅰa期鳞癌、Ⅰa和Ⅰb期腺癌以及Ⅰb期腺鳞癌效果比单纯手术好。因此,手术+化疗应成为该类病例的标准治疗模式。     

下咽鳞癌不同治疗方案的临床分析

目的　探讨不同的治疗方案治疗下咽鳞癌的疗效 ,提出规范化的治疗方案。方法　回顾性分析 4 6 4例下咽鳞癌患者的临床特征和不同治疗方案的治疗结果 ,运用SPSS 10 .0软件包进行统计分析。结果　术前放疗 +手术 2 0 2例 ,手术 +术后放疗 2 2例 ,单纯手术 2 6例 ,根治性放疗失败挽救性手术 4 0例 ,单纯放疗 174例。总的 5年生存率为 34.2 % ,术前放疗 +手术组、手术 +术后放疗组、单纯手术组、根治性放疗失败挽救性手术组及单纯放疗组 5年生存率分别为 4 6 .3%、4 9.2 %、2 2 .8%、4 0 .8%和 18.0 % (P <0 .0 1)。术前放疗 +手术组与单纯手术组比较 ,生存率差异有统计学意义 (P =0 .0 4 6 )。术前放疗 +手术组喉功能保留者 80例 ,占 39.6 % ;手术 +术后放疗和单纯手术组喉功能保留者 8例 ,占 16 .7% ,差异有统计学意义 (P =0 .0 0 3)。单纯放疗组和术前放疗 +手术组死于局部复发分别为 2 7.6 %和 8.9% (P =0 .0 0 8)。结论　下咽鳞癌患者首先应选择术前放疗 +手术或手术 +术后放疗的综合治疗方案 ,术前放疗 +手术能明显提高下咽鳞癌的喉功能保留率。     

单纯放疗或单纯手术治疗早期声门型喉癌

目的分析早期声门型喉癌单纯手术和单纯放疗的治疗结果和预后因素。方法T1～T2N0M0期声门型喉癌患者456例,其中136人行单纯手术(手术组),320例接受单纯放疗(单放组)。结果手术组和单放组的5、10年总生存率(OS)分别为95.2%和84.8%、89.1%和76.5%(P<0.01)。手术组和单放组的5年无病生存率(DFS)分别为86.6%和80.6%(P=0.250)。手术组和单放组首程治疗后的5年局部控制率(LC)分别为86.2%和81.9%(P=0.420)。全组中80例出现局部区域复发或远地转移,其中70例出现喉部复发,57例进行了挽救性手术。单放组喉保留率显著高于手术组,分别为91.6%和83.9%(P=0.010)。Cox多因素回归分析表明,年龄大、声带活动受限和治疗年代远是影响OS的不良预后因素,前联合受侵是DFS和LC的不良预后因素,前联合受侵和声带活动受限是癌症相关生存率(CSS)的不良预后因素。结论早期声门型喉癌单纯放疗与单纯手术的DFS、LC相同,而且喉保留率高于手术组。影响各项生存率和局部控制率的主要因素为年龄大、声带活动受限、治疗年代久远和前联合受侵。     

术后辅助3DRT改善pT2－3N0M0期食管癌患者长期生存

目的 评价3DRT (3DCRT、IMRT)在pT_2－3N₀M₀期胸段食管鳞癌根治术后辅助治疗中的临床价值。方法 分析2004—2011年本院入组pT_2－3N₀M₀期胸段食管鳞癌根治术后3DRT前瞻性非随机Ⅱ期临床研究的96例及同期全部单纯手术820例患者的复发、生存及放疗不良反应。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并Logrank检验,Cox模型预后多因素分析。结果 术后放疗组T₃期、肿瘤长度≥5 cm患者比例显著高于单纯手术组。术后放疗、单纯手术组5年样本数分别为35、270例。术后放疗、单纯手术组5年OS率分别为74.3%、59.9%(P=0.010),5年DFS率分别为71.0%、51.7%(P=0.002)。多因素分析显示术后放疗是影响OS、DFS的因素(P=0.030、0.004)。术后放疗组和单纯手术组总复发率、LRR率、远处转移率分别为22.9%和43.0%(P=0.000)、18.8%和35.2%(P=0.001)、11.5%和21.3%(P=0.024)。术后放疗组25例(26.0%)发生3级早晚期不良反应。结论 辅助3DRT较单纯手术降低了pT_2－3N₀M₀期胸段食管鳞癌术后复发率,提高了5年DFS、OS且不良反应反应可耐受,但还需前瞻性Ⅲ期随机研究证实。     

ⅡB期子宫颈癌治疗方法的探讨

目的:探讨手术综合治疗ⅡB期宫颈癌患者的临床疗效及预后影响因素.方法:选取2003-12-2005-12接受手术联合放疗和(或)化疗的ⅡB期原发宫颈癌患者75例,通过与同期住院的34例单纯放疗、54例同步放化疗患者进行生存率比较,评价手术综合治疗效果,并对可能的影响因素进行分析.结果:手术综合治疗组、单纯放疗组、同步放化疗组的1年生存率分别为96.00%、82.40%和92.60%,3年生存率分别为85.30%、67.60%和81.50%,5年生存率分别为75.50%、62.80%和79.60%.校正年龄因素后,手术综合治疗组的1年生存率高于单纯放疗组(x2=5.975,P=0.015),与同步放化疗组相似;3、5年生存率差异无统计学意义.单因素分析结果提示,淋巴结转移、淋巴管癌栓、脉管癌栓及体质量指数与预后相关;多因素分析结果显示,淋巴结转移为其独立的危险因素,P=0.001,RR=5.936.结论:手术治疗ⅡB期宫颈癌患者是可以考虑的,淋巴结转移者预后差.     

77例胃的黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤的临床分析

目的 回顾分析原发于胃的黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤(MALT)的治疗结果、预后因素和失败类型.方法 搜集20余年间收治的原发胃MALT淋巴瘤病例,病理证实且为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、ⅡE期.77例患者进入分析,手术切除组60例(手术14例、手术+化疗32例、手术+化放疗4例、手术+放疗9例、化疗+手术+化疗1例),非手术切除组17例(化放疗11例、化疗5例、放疗1例).放疗采用常规放疗(20例)和三维适形放疗(5例).化疗采用CHOP、BACOP或COP方案(53例).结果 随访1～198个月,中位值57个月.全组患者5年总生存率为74%,5年无瘤生存率为70%,5年局部控制率为76%,5年无远处失败生存率为87%.单因素分析显示临床分期与总生存率显著相关(P=0.02),肿瘤大小(P=0.03)和手术程度(P=0.02)与无瘤生存率显著相关,临床分期(P=0.04)、肿瘤大小(P=0.01)和手术程度(P=0.03)与局部控制率显著相关,未发现与无远处失败生存率显著相关因素.Ⅰ、Ⅱ期患者手术治疗后失败主要在远处,非手术治疗患者的失败主要在局部.ⅡE期患者,无论手术组还是非手术组,失败主要在局部.结论 胃原发黏膜组织相关淋巴瘤采用手术和非手术治疗均可取得很好的治疗效果,临床分期是非常重要的预后因素.     

Real-World Treatment of Stage III NSCLC: The Role of Trimodality Treatment in the Era of Immunotherapy

IntroductionCurative intent treatment of stage III NSCLC is variable and influenced by both patient and disease characteristics. We performed a real-world analysis of curative therapies in stage III NSCLC, and explored the impact of known prognostic factors on outcome.MethodsA retrospective review was completed of all patients with stage III NSCLC between January 2005 and December 2012. Cases were filtered to identify those receiving curative intent therapy including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and combined modality with surgery (S + RT). Information was collected on known prognostic and predictive factors, and immunotherapy eligibility per the PACIFIC trial. The primary outcome measure was overall survival.ResultsA total of 638 patients with stage III NSCLC were referred and received curative intent treatment. Of these, 66 (10%) received surgery, 95 (15%) RT, 410 (64%) CRT, and 67 (11%) combined S + RT. Median overall survival (OS) was similar for surgery (28.6 mo) and CRT (27.0 mo), inferior for RT alone (17.5 mo), and superior for S + RT (55.8 mo). In a multivariate model only, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and treatment cohort significantly influenced OS. In a case-matched analysis, the median OS for CRT was 31.9 months, compared to 55.8 months with trimodality treatment. Overall, 61% of patients receiving CRT and 88% of those receiving trimodality therapy would have been potentially eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy.ConclusionsIn stage III NSCLC, the performance of surgery and CRT are similar after controlling for known prognostic factors. Radiotherapy alone is associated with worse outcomes. Combined S + RT appears to provide a significant benefit above other modalities, albeit in highly selected patients.     

From conventionally fractionated radiation therapy to hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone and with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The authors' single-institution experience in patients with early-stage (I and II) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated between 1980 and 1998 with either conventionally fractionated (CF) radiation therapy (RT), or hyperfractionated (HFX) RT, or HFX RT with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin (HFX RT-Pac/C) was reviewed. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients received 60 grays (Gy) in 30 daily fractions (CF), 116 patients received 69.6 Gy (1.2 Gy twice daily), and 56 patients received 67.6 Gy (1.3 Gy twice daily) with concurrent, low-dose, daily C (25 mg/m2) and Pac (10 mg/m2). Biologically equivalent doses for the 3 groups were 72 Gy, 78 Gy, and 76 Gy, respectively, for acute effects (alpha/beta = 10 Gy) and 120 Gy, 111 Gy, and 111 Gy, respectively, for late effects (alpha/beta = 2 Gy). RESULTS: For all 250 patients, the overall median survival was 27 months, the cause-specific survival was 27 months, the local progression-free survival was 32 months, and distant metastasis-free survival was not achieved; and the respective 5-year survival rates were 27%, 32%, 45%, and 68%. CF achieved significantly inferior survival than either HFX RT alone or HFX RT-Pac/C (P = .0332 and P = .0013, respectively), and no difference was observed between the 2 HFX RT regimens (P = .1934). Only acute hematologic high-grade toxicity (grade >or=3) was more frequent with HFX RT-Pac/C than with either RT alone, whereas other toxicities were similar between the 3 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: HFX RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy may be better than CF in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The role of chemotherapy deserves further investigation, because the group that received chemotherapy in the current study had a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.     

放化疗中不同化疗方式对N3期鼻咽癌预后影响

目的 评价放化疗中不同方式化疗对N3期鼻咽癌患者预后的影响.方法 回顾分析114例N3期鼻咽癌患者资料.9例接受单纯放疗;105例接受以铂类为基础化疗联合放疗,其中同期放化疗37例,诱导化疗+同期放化疗53例,同期放化疗+辅助化疗15例.鼻咽原发灶采用60Co γ线、6 MV X线常规分割照射70 Gy,颈部根治量60～68 Gy,颈部预防量54～60 Gy.结果 中位随访时间54个月,共51例患者死亡.全组5年总生存率为59.1%.单纯放疗、同期放化疗、诱导化疗+同期放化疗、同期放化疗+辅助化疗的5年总生存率分别为17%、51%、68%、71%(X2=15.44,P=0.001),无复发生存率分别为83%、77%、88%、93%(X2=2.34,P:0.505),无转移生存率分别为17%、54%、72%、80%(X2=19.28,P=0.000).结论 诱导化疗+同期放化疗及同期放化疗+辅助化疗方式对N3期鼻咽癌患者比单纯同期放化疗更具优势,最有效治疗方式有待随机研究证实.

Abstract：

Objective Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with stage N3 disease are prone to develop distant metastasis even treated with standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CRT).The aim of this study is to compare the ettlcacy of difierent chemotherapy sequences in these patients.Methotis All patients with histologically proven,carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated between July 1999 and November 2003 were restaged according to the AJCC 2002 stage classification system.A total of 114 patients had AJCC N3 diseases were analyzed retrospectively.Patients were treated by conventional RT technique using 6 MV photons or 60 Coγ-ray with 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction,5 fractions a week,to a planned dose of 70 Gy.The prophylactic irradiation dose of the neck wss 54-60 Gy.Any positive lymph node was boosted to a total dose of 60-68 Gy.All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy of difierent sequences but 9 patients RT alone.CRT regimen was delivered in 37 patients,neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)+CRT regimen in 53 patients and CRT+adjuvant chemotherapy(AC)regimen in 15 patients.Results The prophylactic irradiation dose of the neck wss 54-60 Gy.Any positive lymph node was boosted to a total dose of 60-68 Gy.All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy of difierent sequences but 9 patients received RT alone.CRT regimen was delivered in 37 patients,neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)+CRT regimen in 53 patients and CRT+adjuvant chemotherapy(AC)regimen in 15 patients.Results The median follow up time was 54 months(3-117months).The 5-year overall survival rate was 59.1%in whole groups,and with 17%,51%,68%and 71%in RT,CRT,NACT+CRT and CRT+AC group,respectively(X2=15.44,P=0.001).The 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 83%,77%,88%and 93%in RT,CRT,NACT+CRT and CRT+AC group,respectively(X2=2.34,P=0.505).The 5-year metastasis-free survival rates were 17%,54%,72%and 80%in RT,CRT,NACT+CRT and CRT+AC group,respectively(X2=19.28,P=0.000).Conclusions The NACT+CRT and CRT+AC regimens were more effective than CRT alone for N3 disease in the current study.Large prospective,randomized clinieal studies are warranted.     

IORT在不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌治疗中作用

目的 探讨电子线IORT在不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌中的价值。方法 回顾分析2009—2014年本院行电子线IORT的不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌共167例患者的OS期、LR率、不良反应。IORT剂量10~20 Gy。术后12例体外照射、56例同步CRT、17例化疗。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,Logrank法检验差异和单因素预后分析,Cox模型多因素预后分析。结果 随访率100%。中位OS期10.3个月,2年OS率为22.0%。中位PFS 6.3个月,2年PFS率为9.9%。CSS期11.2个月,2年CSS率为23.6%。仅行IORT时,<15 Gy、15 Gy和>15 Gy的中位OS及1年OS率分别为6.2个月和10.0%、9.1个月和39.6%、22.2个月和74.4%(P=0.000)。术后辅助治疗模式中IORT+CRT的中位OS期11.6个月,生存最佳(P=0.033)。单因素分析显示IORT剂量、肿瘤大小和限光筒直径为影响预后因素(P=0.000、0.006、0.007),多因素分析显示IORT联合术后放疗、IORT剂量为影响预后因素(P=0.006、0.000)。结论 对于不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌,电子线IORT是安全有效治疗手段,避开胃肠组织前提下适当增加剂量可提高疗效,术后CRT可更好延长生存且不增加不良反应。     

Outcomes of patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation with and without surgery

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with improved outcome after treatment for stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS:

A retrospective review of stage III NSCLC patients treated at who were treated at the Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center was done with institutional review board approval. Patients were followed for toxicity, local and distant failure, and overall survival. Multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with treatment outcome.

RESULTS:

Between August 2000 and November 2006, 144 patients received concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for stage III NSCLC. Eighty of 144 patients were men (56%), and the median age was 61 years (range, 33‐81 years). Sixty‐two patients (43%) had stage IIIA NSCLC, and 82 patients (57%) had stage IIIB NSCLC. Radiotherapy (RT) was given concurrently with chemotherapy to all patients; 100 patients (69%) received CRT without surgery, and 44 patients (31%) received with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgical resection. The median RT dose was 60 grays (Gy) (range, 46‐70 Gy). The median follow‐up was 15 months (range, 3‐64 months), the median potential follow‐up was 37 months (range, 12‐84 months), and the median overall survival was 22 months (95% confidence interval, 15‐28 months). The 1‐year and 2‐year survival rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Among the 44 patients who underwent resection, the median survival was 61 months, and the 2‐year survival rate was 73%. On multivariate analysis, stage at the time of treatment (stage IIIA vs stage IIIB) and use of surgery were the only factors associated with improved outcome (P = .01 and P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this retrospective series, those patients who were able to undergo resection appeared to have improved outcome after induction CRT. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

不能手术的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌的综合治疗

目的　对比研究Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌放射治疗＋化疗综合治疗的疗效,探讨更有效的治疗方式。方法　60例Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者均分至2个组。单放组采用常规分割,总量60～70?Gy,6～7周,综合治疗组采用放射治疗加化疗,化疗采用以顺铂为主的化疗方案,在放射治疗同时或前中后进行,最少2个周期。结果　2个组治疗后完全缓解率单放组为20%,综合组为43%;病情进展率单放组为10%,综合组为7%,2个组近期疗效差异无显著性意义（χ     

老年食管癌替吉奥同期放疗的临床疗效观察

目的:探讨替吉奥同期放疗治疗老年食管癌的疗效及其不良反应.方法:80例老年食管鳞状细胞癌患者随机法分为单纯放疗组(RT组)40例和替吉奥同期放疗组(CRT组)40例.CRT组放疗剂量50.4 Gy/28次,RT组63.0 Gy/35次.结果:CRT和RT组患者的有效率分别为85.0％(34/40)和65.0％(26/40),差异有统计学意义,P=0.039.CRT组患者的中位生存期为21.0个月,RT组为15.5个月,差异有统计学意义,P=0.044.CRT和RT组患者3年生存率分别为32.5％和12.5％.毒副反应发生率差异无统计学意义.结论:对于老年食管癌患者,可采用替吉奥同期放疗的治疗方法,以期获得更好的疗效及长期生存.     

182例局部晚期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术加术前新辅助治疗预后分析

目的 观察局部晚期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术加术前同期放化疗(CRCT)、单纯放疗(RT)的疗效,并分析影响预后的因素。方法 回顾分析2006—2011年收治的 182例Ⅰ_B2~Ⅲ_B期宫颈癌患者资料,其中 59例RT,123例术前每周顺铂40 mg/m²同期RT,放疗剂量 40~50 Gy分 20~25次。新辅助治疗后 2~3周行全子宫、双附件及盆腔淋巴结切除术。采用Cox法行多因素预后分析。结果 随访时间满 3年者为 69例。肿瘤直径≥4.5 cm时术前CRCT与RT的 3年无进展生存(PFS)、总生存(OS)率均相似(χ²=1.84、1.56,P=0.176、0.221),<4.5 cm时术前CRCT比RT的PFS、OS率高(χ²=5.22、4.81,P=0.022、0.018)。全组 3年PFS、OS率分别为92.0%、93.8%。Cox分析显示肿瘤直径(<6 cm与≥6 cm)是PFS、OS的影响因素(χ²=2.56、4.06,P=0.011、0.007),年龄(<48岁与≥48岁)是OS的影响因素(χ²=4.86,P=0.046),术后淋巴结状况(是否转移)是PFS的影响因素(χ²=1.04,P=0.010)。     

Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic factors for the management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the maxillary sinus, who received preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). We also elucidated the appropriate sequence of chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients (median age 62 years) with SCC of the maxillary sinus were analysed retrospectively. T3 or T4 disease was found in 93% of the patients. Thirty-nine patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), 38 patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 47 patients received NA followed by CRT. The median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Maxillectomy was undertaken in 98 patients. RESULTS: The 5 year overall survival (OAS) and local control probability (LCP) were 56.6 and 73.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, surgery (P < 0.0001) and T classification (P < 0.04) were significant prognostic factors for OAS and LCP. Histological grade and nodal status were also related to OAS. However, any chemotherapy sequence was not associated with the treatment outcome. On multivariate analysis, surgery (P < 0.0005) and T classification (P < 0.05) were identified as significant prognostic factors for LCP and OAS. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that both surgery and T stage are important prognostic factors for LCP and OAS in the management of SCC of the maxillary sinus. The appropriate sequence of chemotherapy remains to be elucidated in the future study.     

Radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for cervical cancer with periaortic lymph node metastasis

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and radiation therapy (RT) alone for cervical cancer with periaortic nodal metastasis (PANM). Twenty-one patients with cervical cancer with PANM were identified. Eleven patients received concomitant CRT with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and 10 received RT alone. The median age was 44 years. Ten, 5, and 6 patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB, IIB, and IIIB disease. The RT doses to point A and the periaortic region were 80 to 85 Gy (low dose rate equivalent) and 45 Gy. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 3 to 141 months). The 1- and 3-year disease-specific survival were 81.8% and 81.8%, and 70% and 30%, respectively, for the CRT and RT groups, (P = 0.11). The 1- and 3-year pelvic and periaortic control rates (PPC) were 100% and 100% (CRT), and 56.3% and 42.2% (RT) (P = 0.03). The 1- and 3-year free-from-distant metastasis (DM) rates were 81.8% and 81.8% (CRT), and 78.7% and 49.2% (RT) (P = 0.54). All patients who developed DM died of their disease. CRT is a feasible treatment option to improve the PPC for these patients. Because of the high rate of distant metastasis despite PPC, more effective systemic therapy should be explored.