Mosaic type-1 NF1 microdeletions as a cause of both generalized and segmental neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1)

Mosaicism is an important feature of type-1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) on account of its impact upon both clinical manifestations and transmission risk. Using FISH and MLPA to screen 3500 NF1 patients, we identified 146 individuals harboring gross NF1 deletions, 14 of whom (9.6%) displayed somatic mosaicism. The high rate of mosaicism in patients with NF1 deletions supports the postulated idea of a direct relationship between the high new mutation rate in this cancer predisposition syndrome and the frequency of mosaicism. Seven of the 14 mosaic NF1 deletions were type-2, whereas four were putatively type-1, and three were atypical. Two of the four probable type-1 deletions were confirmed as such by breakpoint-spanning PCR or SNP analysis. Both deletions were associated with a generalized manifestation of NF1. Independently, we identified a third patient with a mosaic type-1 NF1 deletion who exhibited segmental NF1. Together, these three cases constitute the first proven mosaic type-1 deletions so far reported. In two of these three mosaic type-1 deletions, the breakpoints were located within PRS1 and PRS2, previously identified as hotspots for nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) during meiosis. Hence, NAHR within PRS1 and PRS2 is not confined to meiosis but may also occur during postzygotic mitotic cell cycles.     

Germline and somatic NF1 gene mutation spectrum in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs)

About 10% of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) and represent considerable patient morbidity and mortality. Elucidation of the genetic mechanisms by which inherited and acquired NF1 disease gene variants lead to MPNST development is important. A study was undertaken to identify the constitutional and somatic NF1 mutations in 34 MPNSTs from 27 NF1 patients. The NF1 germline mutations identified in 22 lymphocytes DNA from these patients included seven novel mutations and a large 1.4-Mb deletion. The NF1 germline mutation spectrum was similar to that previously identified in adult NF1 patients without MPNST. Somatic NF1 mutations were identified in tumor DNA from 31 out of 34 MPNSTs, of which 28 were large genomic deletions. The high prevalence (>90%) of such deletions in MPNST contrast with the =or<20% found in benign neurofibromas and is indicative of the involvement of different mutational mechanisms in these tumors. Coinactivation of the TP53 gene by deletion, or by point mutation along with NF1 gene inactivation, is known to exacerbate disease symptoms in NF1, therefore TP53 gene inactivation was screened. DNA from 20 tumors showed evidence for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) across the TP53 region in 11 samples, with novel TP53 point mutations in four tumors.     

Cardiac characterization of 16 patients with large NF1 gene deletions

The aim of this study was to characterize cardiac features of patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) and large deletions of the NF1 gene region. The study participants were 16 patients with large NF1 deletions and 16 age‐ and sex‐matched NF1 patients without such deletions. All the patients were comprehensively characterized clinically and by echocardiography. Six of 16 NF1 deletion patients but none of 16 non‐deletion NF1 patients have major cardiac abnormalities (p = 0.041). Congenital heart defects (CHDs) include mitral insufficiency in two patients and ventricular septal defect, aortic stenosis, and aortic insufficiency in one patient each. Three deletion patients have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Two patients have intracardiac tumors. NF1 patients without large deletions have increased left ventricular (LV) diastolic posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and increased intraventricular diastolic septal thickness (p = 0.001) compared with a healthy reference population without NF1, suggestive of eccentric LV hypertrophy. CHDs and other cardiovascular anomalies are more frequent among patients with large NF1 deletion and may cause serious clinical complications. Eccentric LV hypertrophy may occur in NF1 patients without whole gene deletions, but the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. All patients with clinical suspicion for NF1 should be referred to a cardiologist for evaluation and surveillance.     

Somatic loss of wild type NF1 allele in neurofibromas: Comparison of NF1 microdeletion and non-microdeletion patients

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant familial tumor syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple benign neurofibromas. In 95% of NF1 individuals, a mutation is found in the NF1 gene, and in 5% of the patients, the germline mutation consists of a microdeletion that includes the NF1 gene and several flanking genes. We studied the frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the NF1 region as a mechanism of somatic NF1 inactivation in neurofibromas from NF1 patients with and without a microdeletion. There was a statistically significant difference between these two patient groups in the proportion of neurofibromas with LOH. None of the 40 neurofibromas from six different NF1 microdeletion patients showed LOH, whereas LOH was observed in 6/28 neurofibromas from five patients with an intragenic NF1 mutation (P = 0.0034, Fisher's exact). LOH of the NF1 microdeletion region in NF1 microdeletion patients would de facto lead to a nullizygous state of the genes located in the deletion region and might be lethal. The mechanisms leading to LOH were further analyzed in six neurofibromas. In two out of six neurofibromas, a chromosomal microdeletion was found; in three, a mitotic recombination was responsible for the observed LOH; and in one, a chromosome loss with reduplication was present. These data show an important difference in the mechanisms of second hit formation in the 2 NF1 patient groups. We conclude that NF1 is a familial tumor syndrome in which the type of germline mutation influences the type of second hit in the tumors.     

Extended runs of homozygosity at 17q11.2: an association with type‐2 NF1 deletions?

Large deletions in the NF1 gene region at 17q11.2 are caused by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). The recurrent type‐2 NF1 deletions span 1.2 Mb, with breakpoints in the SUZ12 gene and SUZ12P. Type‐2 NF1 deletions occur preferentially during mitosis and are associated with somatic mosaicism. A panel of 16 type‐2 NF1 deletions was used as a model system in which to investigate whether extended homozygosity across 17q11.2 might be associated with somatic deletion. Using SNP arrays, a 3.2 Mb interval encompassing the NF1 deletion region was found to harbor runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in different human populations. However, ROHs ≥500 kb directly flanking the NF1 deletion region on both sides were not found to occur disproportionately in NF1 patients harboring type‐2 deletions compared to controls. Although low allelic diversity in 17q11.2 is unlikely to be a key factor in promoting NAHR‐mediated somatic type‐2 deletions, a specific ROH of 588 kb (roh1), located some 525 kb proximal to the deletion interval, was found to occur more frequently (P=0.012) in the type‐2 deletion patients compared with controls. We postulate that roh1 may act remotely, via an as yet unknown mechanism, to increase the frequency of somatic recombination between the distally duplicated SUZ12 sequences. Hum Mutat 30:1–10, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Identification of the small interstitial deletion at chromosome band 1p34-p35 and its association with poor outcome in oligodendroglial tumors

To narrow down the putative tumor-suppressor gene locus and to assess the predictability of clinical courses by genomic alterations, we analyzed 46 oligodendroglial tumors for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the distal region of the short arm of chromosome 1. LOH at 1p was found in 43 tumors (93.5%), including all 28 oligodendrogliomas, all eight oligo-astrocytomas, six of eight anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, and in one of two anaplastic oligo-astrocytomas. Thirty-seven tumors showed LOH patterns consistent with a large terminal deletion, whereas six tumors showed LOH suggesting interstitial deletions. Our data also showed two small regions of overlap at 1p34-p35 (approximately 5.7 Mb) and at 1p36.1-p36.2 ( approximately 12 Mb). Among the six tumors with interstitial deletion, the proximal region was deleted in five tumors, whereas the distal region was deleted in only half of them. Overall, 91% of tumors showed deletion including this proximal region. To examine the clinical significance of the LOH pattern, the samples were classified into three groups: tumors without 1p LOH (Group 1, n = 3), tumors with an interstitial deletion (Group 2, n = 6), and tumors with a large terminal deletion (Group 3, n = 37). Both overall and progression-free survival of patients in Group 2 was extremely poor compared with those included in Group 3 (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.003, respectively). As to the clinical response to chemotherapy, nimustine prevented tumor recurrence in Group 3 (P = 0.034) but not in Group 2. Our results demonstrate that a putative tumor-suppressor gene(s) in oligodendroglial tumors is localized at 1p34-p35 and that small interstitial deletions, in contrast to large terminal deletions, are strongly predictive of both chemoresistance and aggressive characteristics of these tumors.     

Internal tumor burden in neurofibromatosis Type I patients with large NF1 deletions

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a frequent tumor suppressor gene disorder characterized by multiple benign tumors and high risk of malignancy. Internal tumor burden is a major disease-associated manifestation and can be most adequately assessed by magnetic resonance imaging of the whole body. Approximately 5% of NF1 patients have constitutional large NF1-deletions that are generally associated with more severe clinical manifestations. Here, we investigated whether these deletion patients also have more and/or larger internal tumors by assessing internal tumors and their total volume (exclusive of cutaneous and subcutaneous) in 38 NF1 deletion patients (including eight mosaic cases) and 114 age- and gender-matched NF1 patients without deletions. The incidence of internal tumors was significantly lower in mosaic deletion patients (1/8 = 13%) but did not differ between the 30 nonmosaic deletion patients and the 90 age- and gender-matched NF1 patients without large deletions used as controls. Neither the number nor the total volume of tumors per patient differed significantly between the latter two groups. However, extremely high tumor burden (>3,000 ml) was significantly more frequent among nonmosaic NF1 deletion patients than among NF1 patients without large deletions (13% vs. 1%, P = 0.014). Thus, as a group, patients with NF1 deletions do not exhibit a significantly higher internal tumor burden than NF1 patients without such deletions. However, deletion patients can frequently have extremely large internal tumors and thus demand special attention.     

Example of somatic mosaicism in a series of de novo neurofibromatosis type 1 cases due to a maternally derived deletion

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), affecting primarily the growth of neural crest-derived tissues, is one of the most common autosomal dominant genetic disorders with an unusually high spontaneous mutation rate. In four cases of sporadic NF1, demonstrated by hemizygosity to have a deletion involving the NF1 gene, we were able to assign the deletion event to the maternally derived chromosome. One of these individuals was determined to be a somatic mosaic for NF1, as a trace of the maternally derived haplotype was detected at the NF1 locus. This indicated a postzygotic, as opposed to gametic, deletion event. It may be that somatic mosaicism is more common in NF1 than has hitherto been appreciated and may responsible in part for the high mutation rate in this disorder. In addition, it is suggested that the mechanism(s) of gene deletion is subject to a parent of origin effect, being more frequent on the maternally derived chromosome. This is in contrast to the other types of mutations which, in sporadic NF1, have been found to occur preferentially on the paternally derived chromosome. Hum Mutat 9:452–457, 1997 © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Germline and somatic NF1 gene mutations in plexiform neurofibromas

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a common autosomal dominant neurogenetic disorder affecting 1 in 4000 individuals worldwide, results from functional inactivation of the 17q11.2-located NF1 gene. Plexiform neurofibroma (PNF) is a congenital benign tumour present in 30-50% of NF1 patients, which in about 10-15% of cases, can develop into a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST). This study aimed to characterise the NF1 germline and somatic mutations associated with such tumours by DNA analysis in 51 PNFs resected from 44 unrelated NF1 patients. Germline mutations were identified in 35 patients, of which 21 were novel. Somatic NF1 mutations were found in 29 PNF DNAs, which included 9 point mutations, 5 being novel, and 20 tumour DNA samples exhibiting, either loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the NF1 gene region (16 tumours), or complete or partial NF1 gene deletions analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MPLA) analysis. The type of NF1 germline mutations detected in patients with PNF were similar to those detected in most NF1 patients. LOH of the NF1 gene region, as identified by marker analysis and/or MLPA, was detected in only 20/29 (69%) PNFs, compared to the >90% LOH previously found in MPNST. This systematic analysis of the NF1 germline and somatic mutations associated with PNF development suggest that in most such tumours neither the NF1 somatic mutation type, nor its gene location, is influenced by the underlying NF1 germline mutation. Evidence for LOH involving the TP53 gene identified in the PNFs is also reported for the first time.     

A search for evidence of somatic mutations in the NF1 gene

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder affecting 1 in 3000 people. The NF1 gene is located on chromosome 17q11.2, spans 350 kb of genomic DNA, and contains 60 exons. A major phenotypic feature of the disease is the widespread occurrence of benign dermal and plexiform neurofibromas. Genetic and biochemical data support the hypothesis that NF1 acts as a tumour suppressor gene. Molecular analysis of a number of NF1 specific tumours has shown the inactivation of both NF1 alleles during tumourigenesis, in accordance with Knudson's "two hit" hypothesis. We have studied 82 tumours from 45 NF1 patients. Two separate strategies were used in this study to search for the somatic changes involved in the formation of NF1 tumours. First, evidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the NF1 gene region was investigated, and, second, a screen for the presence of sequence alterations was conducted on a large panel of DNA derived from matched blood/tumour pairs. In this study, the largest of its kind to date, we found that 12% of the tumours (10/82) exhibited LOH; previous studies have detected LOH in 3-36% of the neurofibromas examined. In addition, an SSCP/HA mutation screen identified five novel NF1 germline and two somatic mutations. In a plexiform neurofibroma from an NF1 patient, mutations in both NF1 alleles have been characterised.     

Analysis of Crossover Breakpoints Yields New Insights into the Nature of the Gene Conversion Events Associated with Large NF1 Deletions Mediated by Nonallelic Homologous Recombination

Large NF1 deletions are mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). An in‐depth analysis of gene conversion operating in the breakpoint‐flanking regions of large NF1 deletions was performed to investigate whether the rate of discontinuous gene conversion during NAHR with crossover is increased, as has been previously noted in NAHR‐mediated rearrangements. All 20 germline type‐1 NF1 deletions analyzed were mediated by NAHR associated with continuous gene conversion within the breakpoint‐flanking regions. Continuous gene conversion was also observed in 31/32 type‐2 NF1 deletions investigated. In contrast to the meiotic type‐1 NF1 deletions, type‐2 NF1 deletions are predominantly of post‐zygotic origin. Our findings therefore imply that the mitotic as well as the meiotic NAHR intermediates of large NF1 deletions are processed by long‐patch mismatch repair (MMR), thereby ensuring gene conversion tract continuity instead of the discontinuous gene conversion that is characteristic of short‐patch repair. However, the single type‐2 NF1 deletion not exhibiting continuous gene conversion was processed without MMR, yielding two different deletion‐bearing chromosomes, which were distinguishable in terms of their breakpoint positions. Our findings indicate that MMR failure during NAHR, followed by post‐meiotic/mitotic segregation, has the potential to give rise to somatic mosaicism in human genomic rearrangements by generating breakpoint heterogeneity.     

Dissecting loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated neurofibromas: Importance of copy neutral LOH

Dermal neurofibromas (dNFs) are benign tumors of the peripheral nervous system typically associated with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. Genes controlling the integrity of the DNA are likely to influence the number of neurofibromas developed because dNFs are caused by somatic mutational inactivation of the NF1 gene, frequently evidenced by loss of heterozygosity (LOH). We performed a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence and mechanisms of LOH in dNFs. Our study included 518 dNFs from 113 patients. LOH was detected in 25% of the dNFs (N = 129). The most frequent mechanism causing LOH was mitotic recombination, which was observed in 62% of LOH‐tumors (N = 80), and which does not reduce the number of NF1 gene copies. All events were generated by a single crossover located between the centromere and the NF1 gene, resulting in isodisomy of 17q. LOH due to the loss of the NF1 gene accounted for a 38% of dNFs with LOH (N = 49), with deletions ranging in size from ～80 kb to ～8 Mb within 17q. In one tumor we identified the first example of a neurofibroma‐associated second‐hit type‐2 NF1 deletion. Analysis of the prevalence of mechanisms causing LOH in dNFs in individual patients (possibly under genetic control) will elucidate whether there exist interindividual variation. Hum Mutat 32:78–90, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Somatic mosaicism of a greater than 1.7-Mb deletion of genomic DNA involving the entire NF1 gene as verified by FISH: further evidence for a contiguous gene syndrome in 17q11.2.

We report on a third case with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) due to mosaicism for a gross deletion in 17q11.2 covering the entire NF1 gene. The deletion was suspected in Giemsa banded chromosomes and was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using the cosmids CO919 from the 5' region, GO2121 from the central, H10410 from the 3' region of the NF1 gene, and the 1.7-Mb YAC 947G11 spanning the entire 350-kb genomic DNA of the NF1 gene. The deletion was present in 33% of peripheral blood lymphocytes and 58% of fibroblasts. The clinical manifestations in this 6-year-old male patient were especially severe and extended beyond the typical features of NF1. The patient also displayed facial anomalies, severe and early-onset psychomotor retardation, seizures, spasticity, and microcephaly. These features differ from other large-deletion NF1 patients, even nonmosaic cases. The complex phenotype could be explained by the involvement of coding sequences flanking the NF1 gene, thus supporting the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome in 17q11.2.     

Screening 500 unselected neurofibromatosis 1 patients for deletions of the NF1 gene

A total of 500 unselected unrelated neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) patients were screened for deletions of the NF1 gene. After excluding 67 patients with known intragenic NF1 mutations, the remaining 433 were genotyped using six intragenic and one distal microsatellite marker for the NF1 gene. A total of 28 patients were hemi- or homozygous for all seven markers and were thus considered as candidates for NF1 deletion with a calculated probability of 99.99%. Metaphase or interphase cells were available from 23 of these 28 individuals for molecular cytogenetics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed an NF1 deletion in 22 (96%) of the 23 patients. Thus, a constitutional deletion of the NF1 gene is responsible for the disease phenotype in at least 4.4% of the 500 unselected NF1 patients. Genotyping using multiple microsatellite markers may provide a simple, inexpensive, and efficient strategy for screening deletions of the NF1 gene, and can as well be applied for other large genes.     

Familial neurofibromatosis type 1 associated with an overgrowth syndrome resembling Weaver syndrome.

The simultaneous occurrence of familial neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and an overgrowth syndrome resembling Weaver syndrome was observed in two related cases (a mother and her son). NF1 was confirmed by molecular genetic analysis showing a large deletion at 17q11.2, encompassing the entire NF1 gene. The other symptoms in the two cases were similar to the features reported in Weaver syndrome. Although the combination of NF1 and an overgrowth syndrome resembling Weaver syndrome in this family may be fortuitous, we favour the hypothesis that the deletion of the entire gene has caused this combined phenotype. Possible pathogenetic mechanisms are discussed. The observation suggests a relation between NF1 with an extraordinarily large gene deletion and a Weaver(-like) syndrome. This warrants investigation for deletions in the 17q11.2 region in Weaver(-like) syndrome patients.     

A novel mosaic NSD1 intragenic deletion in a patient with an atypical phenotype

Sotos syndrome, which is characterized by overgrowth, macrocephaly, distinctive facial features, and developmental delay, arises from mutations and deletions of the NSD1 gene at 5q35.3. Sixteen NSD1 intragenic deletions (including one in a mosaic condition) and one partial duplication have been reported in patients with Sotos syndrome. Here, we describe a boy aged 4 years and 10 months that showed facial dysmorphism (including frontal bossing, widely spaced eyes, deeply set eyes, a wide nasal bridge, anteverted nares, and a wide mouth), normal growth, and a psychomotor delay. High‐resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis identified a mosaic heterozygous intragenic NSD1 deletion of 38 kb, which included part of intron 2 and the entire exon 3, and led to NSD1 haploinsufficiency. The deletion somatic mosaicism was subsequently confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using fosmid clones. This patient presents the most atypical phenotype thus far associated with NSD1 haploinsufficiency. It is possible that this atypical phenotype may have resulted from the somatic mosaicism of the NSD1 defect. Our study confirms the usefulness of array CGH for increasing the detection rate of NSD1 abnormalities and for diagnosing syndromic patients that do not present an easily recognized phenotype. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Absence of cutaneous neurofibromas in an NF1 patient with an atypical deletion partially overlapping the common 1.4 Mb microdeleted region

The majority of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) microdeletions in 17q11.2 span approximately 1.4 Mb and have breakpoints that lie within the proximal and distal NF1-low copy repeats, termed NF1-REPs. Less frequent are patients with atypical deletions and non-recurring breakpoints. NF1 patients with gross deletions have been reported to manifest a more severe clinical phenotype than NF1 patients with intragenic mutations, and display early onset and extensive growth of neurofibromas. It has been suggested that the deletion of a neighboring gene or genes in addition to the NF1 gene may modify the expression of the disease, particularly with regard to the high burden of cutaneous neurofibromas. Thus, atypical deletions partially overlapping with the common 1.4 Mb microdeletion interval could prove useful in identifying possible genetic modifiers in the NF1 gene region whose haploinsufficiency might promote neurofibroma growth. Here we report a 20-year-old female who has an atypical deletion with a proximal breakpoint in NF1 intron 21 and a distal deletion breakpoint in the ACCN1 gene. The deletion spans 2.7 Mb and was mediated by an intrachromosomal non-homology-driven mechanism, for example, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Remarkably, this patient did not exhibit cutaneous neurofibromas. However, genotype-phenotype comparisons in this and other previously reported patients with atypical deletions partially overlapping the commonly deleted 1.4 Mb interval do not identify a specific deleted region that is associated with increased neurofibroma growth.     

NF1 microdeletion breakpoints are clustered at flanking repetitive sequences

Neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with a submicroscopic deletion spanning the NF1 tumor suppressor gene are remarkable for an early age at onset of cutaneous neurofibromas, suggesting the deletion of an additional locus that potentiates neurofibromagenesis. Construction of a 3.5 Mb BAC/PAC/YAC contig at chromosome 17q11.2 and analysis of somatic cell hybrids from microdeletion patients showed that 14 of 17 cases had deletions of 1.5 Mb in length. The deletions encompassed the entire 350 kb NF1 gene, three additional genes, one pseudogene and 16 expressed sequence tags (ESTs). In these cases, both proximal and distal breakpoints mapped at chromosomal regions of high identity, termed NF1REPs. These REPs, or clusters of paralogous loci, are 15-100 kb and harbor at least four ESTs and an expressed SH3GL pseudogene. The remaining three patients had at least one breakpoint outside an NF1REP element; one had a smaller deletion thereby narrowing the critical region harboring the putative locus that exacerbates neurofibroma development to 1 Mb. These data show that the likely mechanism of NF1 microdeletion is homologous recombination between NF1REPs on sister chromatids. NF1 microdeletion is the first REP-mediated rearrangement identified that results in loss of a tumor suppressor gene. Therefore, in addition to the germline rearrangements reported here, NF1REP-mediated somatic recombination could be an important mechanism for the loss of heterozygosity at NF1 in tumors of NF1 patients.     

Homozygous inactivation of NF1 gene in a patient with familial NF1 and disseminated neuroblastoma

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients are susceptible to tumor development. In the present study we describe a child with NF1 and disseminated neuroblastoma whose death resulted from disease progression. The mother had café-au-lait spots suggesting a familial NF1. Neuroblastoma cells showed MYCN amplification and chromosome 1p36 deletion, common features associated with tumor progression in this malignancy. The NF1 gene displayed a germline T --> C transition of intron 14 in both the proband and mother DNA. This mutation, not yet previously described, occurs in a splicing donor site and produces a new mRNA variant observed together with normal NF1 mRNA. Furthermore, the SSCP analysis of the NF1 gene in tumor cells showed a somatic deletion encompassing the intron 26 and 27b of the paternal NF1 allele. Hence, neuroblastoma cells displayed both somatic and germline mutation of the NF1 gene. Our data suggest that, although rare, neuroblastoma in patients with NF1 may display homozygous gene inactivation.